{"character_count": 1671, "word_count": 301, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9395999908447266], "ccnet_perplexity": [1891.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
~ have 10 day sold OF goods. sad I'M
II them my los hsndted dollars s others nye
hundred. and the two femanIne cases three hundr.d c
nil TarIif mas made loser TO the tune ni hee nun
lfed dollars tEyeEng Post.
IL The Post ought TO suffer for part If THIS
loss. II has continually argued that the mposl-
ton OF Protective Tariff would make all kinds
Of manufactured goods dearer, to nearly or quite
the amount of the duties. 1t was in vain that
we demonstrated the contrary; the British lm-
oo,ters are Free Trade men, and read and swear
by the Post. The consequence is that they have
burnt their fingers badly, as whoever relies on


calculations OF thet paper is pretty certain to Go.


MIR Clayton of Denwnre one Of Mr. Webers thirty odd
Wings who voted steadily aeas, the pfeent Iaiit out hGd
a Speech Lancr>ier, Pennsy ylvana. sc. &c.


Ij The Albany Argus ought TO know the
difference between. JOHN NJ. CLAYTON, who has
not been in office for ma"y years. and Thomas
CLAYTON, now t. 5. Senator from Delaware.
Both o; them are thorough Protective Tdntf
mcp and the latter voted against the present
Tariff bin SIMPLY because OF the surrender ol the
Land Distribution 10 John Tyler's despotic and
trcachcrous Veto. Only last May (3ls,) Mir.
CLAYTON voted that tue Tariff ought not TO be
reduced, while SilaS Wright voted that it ought
tp be; and yet the Argus would represent MIR. G.
as an adversary Of the Tariff! This is but u
characteristic juggle; but the contcunding of
the Senator OF 40 with the Clayton who re-
Gently spoke at Lancaster, is blunder; and the
statement that either Clayton "voted steadily
against the present Tariff, out and out" is a
grnss untruth.