The Postage Reform.
{"character_count": 1701, "word_count": 285, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8676000237464905], "ccnet_perplexity": [2242.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Inc FODghHcepSie aeteS'dP" (oit'ei'y i1''ol
well says:


'The subject of the reduction of the Rates Of Postage
,hcusn petone fur viii, unanm,y. hns douttes had
tne yr-y and crcner dsfecnrd 10 the wants
and vi hes oi,he people could not be perpeIrae'


But the Telegraph does not let It's readers know
that the Wig SENSE passed bill making
thorough Reduction Of Postage, by a very decl-
,fcd Whir vo;c-lhe Wings almost unanimous
far, The Locos nearly 50 against 1t; and that The
!.,co. Foco House refused to pass this or any
plhcr. On the contrary, the Loco Speaker packed
Post Office Committee against us, and that
Committee scarcely met SIX times during The Scs
,io.. and devoted It's attention mainly to render
lnr the fost Office monopoly more oppressive
han i. now is. All the relaxation Of Post Office
charges they would consent TO was a reduction
Of The rates from s, -, Is aud 25 TO ), To- 10
and 2n cents while they proposed AN increase OF
.ne charges on newspapers. The Telegraph Is
quite aware nf these iacts-it knows that the loss
oI Postage Reform is fairly chargeabe on It's OWL
plrty-but 1t conceals the knowledge from its
rcaders. The People shall see it, however,.


Here is the vote III the Senate by which the
II reducing the Rates OF Postage 10 five and ten
cents letter was passed:


YFAs-Mes.r. Alien. A,heron Bnvard, Buchanan ChOate,
C!aptOa. Crnt'n!ea Devton hea.; fniriied Erg@eis


GJ .G"roe Porter, SlBlqOS. Sthrsenu faADGdge. Tap
,nn. UDhan. WuiSer. Jthe. HOOd5rdse, Woodbury. and


NIYs-lessrs A,chi,on narby. Berrop. Benton Brcese
Cpqut Foser, fuon, Haywood, iiuger, McDuiie Man
ratm semple and Sevet-li.


Wings, Qn Itohcs)-Yeas 20, Nays3.


Incos lin nRomanl-Hcas Q Says