SPEECH or MR.: .cLlNGMAN
{"character_count": 2391, "word_count": 431, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9251999855041504], "ccnet_perplexity": [1741.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The "admifable speech" of MI. .CIinon.n /
thrown the Register into ecstacies He do.;- il0S
every body to read II every body to talk abo,.
and every Whig candidate for the Lerp,sa,n." ~
"digest its wholesome truths" A much h;cI
compliment than the gentleman from RprcosaI
received at the hands of that paper.for his voa.
favor ofthe abofitionfsts : "


We have neither time nor space at nres0...
devote to this effort Hereafter we NAV ,aI..
up, and show how much of truth and sound orrn
ment 1t contains. At any rate, it shall bs ls:,
aside, and It, together with certain abolition 49,.
given by its author in the present Congress sb.n
be forthcoming at the proper time We
threats, but we much mistake the characte, ofh
Buncombe District, if Thomas L. Clinemar .".
represents it again in the National LeeisIatr,o


There is one thing in this speech bowor..
which ought TO be noticed at once, not becanso :,
is calculated to injure Mr.. Van Buren,. but m -
count Of the palpable and odious misrsnro..N
tation it makes in regard to his oniniona
the question of Tariff: Mr. CImgman Save.
"While Mr. Van Buren votes for biob ,.-;g
makes sheep speeches at the North, and u,is,
letters to Indiana in favor of the protec,;ve ,or.
to Virginia he writes4 letter strongly denorr..h
it." What does Mr.. Clingman mean2 Does Ls
as an honest Representative of a portion of ,Ia
honest freemen of North Carolina, mean to or,
press the truth? And did he not supnrsss u.
truth, when he charged Mr. Van Buren ,iL
voting for the tariff of 1928, without Stating at fl.
same time that he did so under instructions f,oo
the New York Legislature2 Bnt it seems am.
Van Buren makes sheep speeches at the Norbn
What an objectionable sin Mr.. Van Ruror
has dared to snake sheep speech" When and
where? And what an argument is this to cor.
from the mouth of the promising and enlightened
Mr. Clingnan Not only this, but he "wrie,
letters to Indiana in favor of the protective roE
Cyl" and to Virginia another "lrtter STRONGLY do.
nouncing" protective tariff We pronounce tb,
statement of Mr.. Clingmon to be as false as It a
ungenerous and Unfair Mr. Van Buren's letter
to Indiana and the one he wrote to Virginia per
fectly agree; and both show him to be, what Mr.
Clingman is not, the advocate of strictly reye
nue. tariff But for the present we leave the Bun.
combe member in the hands of Gen. Saunders and
Dr. Duncan.