Court OF Common Pleas.
{"character_count": 1881, "word_count": 329, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9761000275611877], "ccnet_perplexity": [1804.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



DEC. H. The People Of The State of Nep York vs. Mar
Tin Roth and Sebastian koss This was an action Of tres
brought TO OF 5000, forfeiture Of re-
ed his wife and child in the year 643 and convicted
according the provisions Of the Statute refusing
support his wife The wife complaining that she offered
20 return TO her sbsnd bu. refused support by him.
The husband being bound in the of $200, Roth
became security. The fence Iut in that Roth Of
fsretd to take the wife home Verdict for plaintiff 5000


VIM. J Furman us Patrick O'Neil and Patrick Kelly
his was an action Of assumps brought against the de-
iendants as surety Tor party named Patrick Tcland for
the rent of store 6S Roosevelt street. appeared that
lst May 1893 Tolsnd took lease OF premises for
four years at the rent of $500 per annum The defend
ants the taking became securities for year, and at
the expiration OF the first year renewed the surety the
remaining three years. Toland owing balance Of $2a6
this action brought against the surety The with
the surety bond being lost the defendants contend that
they did sign any bond for the last three years
that il their attached 10 any such document,
the signatures were forged.


ssW a. Garter Whesle, 4 Bragg-This action
brought to recover $780, alleged 10 be due under the fol-
lowing circumstances The defendants are suctoneers,
DUNG business in Broadway-that plaintiff consigned
goods to them, allowing them per cent commission ON
the goods were withdrawn by the plaintiff When de-
found that per commission had been charged
the goods withdrawn by him, amounting to about SS6.
This amount plaintiff refused allow and brings his
ton the amount and the balance admitted TO
be due 1t contended in decnCe that the agreement
not to charge for goods withdrawn was interned by
plaintiff after said agreement had bsen entered and signed
Verdict for plaintiff SlS95l,