DI,.D. l. CHAPMAN.
{"character_count": 2877, "word_count": 515, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9642000198364258], "ccnet_perplexity": [623.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The subioined letter from DR. CHAPMAN, was received last evening after our paper had gone to press, and our packages for the Eas- tern, Southern and Western mails, were made up. We stop the press, in order to lay it., at once. before our city readers, and those iii the country who were not supplied with our paper by the mails of last night. It will appear, again, in our next number, so that all our readers will receive it at the earliest practicable moment.

 Weare gratled at the receipt of this letter, as, we presume, all will be, who desire the harmony and union of the Democratic party in Arkansas. Ii is what we expected from Dr. Chapman. We now repeat our wish, and the wish of many Democrats, that another Convention will be held, and either confirm the present nominations, or make others We also repeat that this is not our wish be- cause we are dissatisfied with the present no- miuees, for we are perfectly satisfied with them. We desire an other Convention in crder to ascertain, beyond doubt, who are the choice of a majority of the party and having aseertained who they are, we will sustain them with what ability and zeal we possess and every true Democrat, laying aside individual preferences, will II lite with us, for the good of the whole party. For this purpose, let the new convention be full one-let it consist of delegates from at the voice ofa majority of the party, and then let all echo and reeeho t throughout the State; and in p@ans of triumph at the next elections. Various days have been suggested by our correspondents for holding the new conven- tion. So far as we are able to judge the 5th Monday in April is the choice of by far the greater number It is the only day named to which no objection has been made We believe, therefore, that 1t will be most con venent for tho greatest number; and feel au- thorzed to propose that it be fixed upon, as the day when the new Convention will as- semble

 BATEsvILLE. ARK, February 2, IS44. To tae Editor of the .arhoasas Banner:

 SR-lherea appears to be some opposition, either to the Democratic State Convention, held at Little Rock in December last, or to the nominees of that Convention If the dissatisfaction is with the people, and they should believe 1t necessary to call another Convention, which shall be composed of de- legates from majority of the counties in the State, my claims, if have any, and my friends think proper again to urge them, will be cheeriully submitted

 Ii has ever been matter of regret to me, that the December Convention was minor ity one, although when the nomination was accepted, 1t was believed to reflect the wish es of a majority of the democratic party

 As had no agency in getting up the first, 1t cannot be expected that will attempt to exercise any influence in bringing about second Convention

 Very respectfully.

 your obd'l serv't.

 D. J CHAPMAN