louisiana.
{"character_count": 1369, "word_count": 246, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9560999870300293], "ccnet_perplexity": [1419.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Journal of Commerce gives returns OF ie'
ported msjorilies from every Parish in LOUISIANA
save the new enc Of Franklin. where we know at
one precinct % Wing votes were cast ioF BoFoe-
lon. and no Loco.Foco votes ct all, but where Ii
seems the election was irregular, Oh rather no
proper notice had been siven OF 1t, and no officers
appointed. The Ioco-Focos, on the other hand,
complain that they did not have fair play IN Cal
c.sieu-taat fewer polls were opened than should
have been. and that the votes actually taken, were
ultimately lost through the blunder Of Wing
Judge. If so, we hope he will be made to smart
for it. Ignorance OF the law ezcuseth no man,
much less public officer. One OF these days an


imperfect Election Return IN an excited canvass
changing the result in State, and possibly IN the
Nation, vil breed civil war. There ought to
be the strongest Laws in every State punishing
an7 material error in holding an Election or ma
king return-criminalIy il wilfai, and by fine II
the result OF ignorance or carelessness. Let US
have such at the earliest moment.


We mean to publish the full returns from Lou
i,iana as soon as we have them complete; mean
time we copy the Journals aggregates for the sew
eral Congressional Districts, (Which, to say the
least, are not too favorable to the Wings and
contrast them witt, the vote of last year, They
