Common Pleas.

Before n full Bench.

DFc. 2l.-DscI
{"character_count": 2569, "word_count": 439, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9390000104904175], "ccnet_perplexity": [1902.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
DEc. -Horatio Underwood and Moses
Couisr-In this cause action was brought to recover
$780, undrr the following circumstances: appeared
that defendants had entered into obligatory bond for
the above amount, and 10th December, l843, plaintiff
had Judgment against ThNmas McAdam for part OF the
amount that said defendant had property which he
cealment having addused the first Judge issued his
warrant-that under said writing obligatory such,
that If said defendant should, within thirty days. apply
for an assignment OF his property and for discharge,
and prosecute the until he obtained such
discharge then the said writing would be void-tut de-
fendant neglected do and the Court under the cir
Gu stances think the plaintiff Ia entitled to Judgment
and this demurrer as frivolous.


El,zabsth Skinner David p. HaH-This was On &C.
ton brought $500 under the following cir.
cumstsnces appeared that defendant had given plain
tiff his bond for the above sum- dated lst January isao
The conditions Of said bond were such, that 5000
paid before ls January 1sa3 then the above ob
cation to be void stated In demurrer that the de.
claraon did not contain the name Of the government
state where the suit brought, the proper title Of
the Court; the Court think that the Court OF Common
Pleas being court Of general jurisdiction 10 OF little
importance how the declaration be although
they do not recommend such a course, and that the
plaintiff Is therefore entitled TO Judgment


Robert msnnsns ads John W Hook and George "a a.
The Court say We to contend that the defendants
gave bis bond voluntarily in lieu Of the bond The
though the question il not free from doubt and difficulty,


incline to the opinion that the bond 10 void and that the
to have been hrss obsors to Ss bppnS acsordns %
to the statute Judgment for plaintiff with liberty for
defendant to plead on payment of costs.


Taac Rannes Edward Dtsiy sued BY tie name Of Ed
scard Dsisv. Judgment vi respondent busters.


Elisha Ruekman ct al ads Frederick Nansie, aiThs
appeal from taxation by both paIiies. Both ap-
peals from taxation dismissed without costs.


Wyliom Paymy vs. .aiesande, PermIy I'm this cause
tho plaintiff sues The defendant his brother for the sup
port o their father in assumpst At the trial the plain
uf obtained the verdict which the defendant moves
to set aside. Verdict confirmed with costs


Pseyis a. Young vs. The Mayer Se-The question
aising in this wheher deputy ofncer, who 10
bound the duties OF the principal during the
.in % % ,ucn ~. 20 ezra y G
Verdict confirmed with costs.