]

To General SAMUEL HoUsros.

CoMMUNICATIoNs.

 LEWrsBuRG. July 8.
{"character_count": 1104, "word_count": 199, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9519000053405762], "ccnet_perplexity": [1371.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
LEWfsBURG, July 5t4l To t5e Edifoy of He .4rkaasas Baqae.

 SIR-We have seen a commmic1 the Times and Advocate-or, more I speaking, in the Byrd orgaa-ha 18th, purporting to come from wan man {he being aloae, by the by.) hs merely state, that the individual, who that communication, asserts what Fs to be mttruths; for we are sure thatil' ocrats of Conway county always hT and always will be, opposed to thos demagogues who would disorganlzeh ocratic party. The writer of that col cation says that Byrd was the chog Democracy of Conway, prior to Apni, is not true. Gen. Byrd necer was and will be, the choice of Conway cOanl a party, we are firm and united agan]l and what few milk-and-cider, pretefla@l, ocrats he may be able to muster oa way stands firm and fast, in the ranh' Democracy. This being the second day of oI' court, and goodly number ol pe0pa ,, ill town, we have heard only te0 Pesss. they intended to support Byrd; ana ana ''s as be considered a fair indication oi ms a. The citizens of Conway are anAVS' and near Gen. DREW.

 Yours respectfully, ,rS5

 JACOB C. MIJTI M0IsTI

 ANDREW GoH1