{"character_count": 965, "word_count": 170, "ccnet_language_score": [0.96670001745224], "ccnet_perplexity": [1368.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



That the Wigs every where endeaVored to
make an issue between a Protective and Revenue
Tariff is the fact, but that issue was universally
and emphaticaliy disGUOwed by our opponents


~ T. Tribune April 3D.
Such is the language of N Y Tribune, rela.
tive to the Connecticut election He refers to the
issues previous to the day of voting. The para
graph is 1ntrue in its length and breadth. The
Wings made no issue between a Protectire and
Revenue Tariff; but on the contrary, they deni-
ed that issue, and falsely stated that the question
was Protective Tariff, or no Tariff and direct
t0r0tton. Such was the course of the Federaiists.
The Democrats advocated Reuenue Tariff.
and in no case, so far know, did they i" DIS,
0Uoao" 1t, the word of Horace Greedy to the
contrary, notwithstanding. Mr.. GfeeIy is either
ignorant of what he talks about, or he wilfnIlv
says that which is not lrue. So much for the
statements of a aleadns Ehig paper.n


Hartford Times.