{"character_count": 926, "word_count": 167, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9746999740600586], "ccnet_perplexity": [994.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
the committee that the discount of Southern and " esien paper, at the time the exchange was made, was from two to twelve and q nan per cent. In one case the average is slated III the other the extremes.

 Q By whom was it proven that Southern aud Western funds were from two to twelve and half per cent Not by Hanger; for hls testimony related entirely to Mississippi paper This all may be true, aud not con tradict the first item in the accounts rendered in reference 10 the particular kind of funds specified

 Why were these statements made and in the language in which they are couched.- For the most obvious reason: the draftsman conld not make his most rational eonclu- sion'' agree with the facts, and, therefore, the facts were made 10 agree with the con clusion. Were they not made for the pur- pose of fixing that ''rational conclusion'' upon the minds of members ssof this House and an enlightened people

 JUSTICE.