THAT sPRIlJG CREEK LETTER
{"character_count": 1747, "word_count": 301, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9729999899864197], "ccnet_perplexity": [1491.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THAT sPRItJG CREEK LETTER.


1t will be recdhccted that a few weeks
since we stated empha,icaIly that most of;he
reported changes in favor Of locOfOcoism in
Mushail county, were false. To cOnfute
our statement a list Of ten changes was pup
iish5d in the Guard, emanaling from Wa
teil5rd Several intelligent and responsible
individuals from that neighborhood, have
since enquired into the matter, and find the
flcts somewhat different from the repre-.
seatation made in the Guard The letter
We suppose was written at Waterford, and
placed n the hands of several ltenerant
change hunters, and in oIder to obtain the
number "IO' these itenerants did not confine
their operations to Spring Creek, where
The letter purports to have been written
but travelled to Pidgeon Roost creek. to the
mouth of Chewally, and up Tallashatc HE
10 Spring Creek, thence TO the head OF said
yTfcek, thence to the beginning. A pretty
considerable neighborhood OF the ten
whose names are assigned TO that letter, We
90 not believe there has been two real chan
ges since November last. We are info-
med that two or three voted The repudiating
ticket last fall, one never has voted, and Is
not now old enough to vote, bu: has always
been a democrat, most ofthe others are good
and true wings, and though strongly in
favor Enumeration. they never will sacrifice
Henry Clay and their long cherished whig
principles for such 4 consideration. Two
others state tha; the letter in the Guard to
which their names were subscribed, they
think, reads very different from the manu-
script letter that was presented to them.


Such, we are informed. are the facts rel
alive to the ten changes at Spring creek, if
any one doubts 1t, we have responsible men
to whom reference can be made