Van Buren, and Annexation.
{"character_count": 1358, "word_count": 249, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9343000054359436], "ccnet_perplexity": [2156.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We doubt not that nncty.nne in every hun.
dred OF the readers of Mr.. Van Buren's luminous
expose of his sentiments regarding the Annexa
tien OF Texas, SO far as they have been able TO
understand him at all, have understood him to be
opposed to Annexation. Yet The Globe mogis
terially says;


1he Country viii have choose between the proposition
of MIR. Van Buren, which enables bare majority the Con
EesS the United States wide the of the unon
inviting Texas is family of States that of Acss Ty
r and Calhoun which enables one.thd the Senate shut
the door her ace and also that Of Mr Clay which bars
forever against her admission"


And agan.


I'VE arently desire Texas admitted into the Union
and embrace tbs plan Of tr Pan Buren the
tieehe 10 ceccmpish II ar Ian Buren shall be retet-
Cd % te Presidency has term u mot epire tciaout
the annexation e Teras 10 the nion. II he defeated
matter by what Influence, It probably lost forever. We
sincerely believe that before the for the Presidency
over every tue inend oil the remuneration of Texas-thosc
who io II oT sake and the sake OF the county
not Tor ultimate POLITICAL almsw SO body and soul or tn.
election OF ilr Van Huren"


We trust the Country is watching these jug
glcrs, who wink iamiiarly at both sides and are
ready to cheat either. They cannot be allowed
to play out this game with impunity.