{"character_count": 868, "word_count": 152, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8928999900817871], "ccnet_perplexity": [2013.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Springfield (Nass.) Democrat,
acknowledging Iocofoco paper has the
following paragraph relative to the nom
ination Of Van Buren,:


"ln 1910. a large majority Of the a.
merican people gave their voice against
MIR. Van Buren. aud there is no evidence
of any material change in his favor.-
Many votei for Gen. Harrison, who
claimed 10 possess democratic principles
avowedIy for the purpose OF a chrHge-
and what was the change from2 From
the Administrations OF Martin Van Bu-
ren. Then, where now, do we find the
evidence that those persons desire "A
change back TO the Administrations of Mr.
Van Buren? While il appears 10 us
that Mr. Van Butcn can get the nomina-
lion cf The Baltimore Convention, it il
eqQaI7y apparent, made so by open IN
dicaiions, ;hat he cannot get the warm
and united support Of 'hc democratic par
tv, without which he can never be elect
cd"