Court OF Common Pleas.

Iames Mnrnhy vs Elins
{"character_count": 1174, "word_count": 206, "ccnet_language_score": [0.945900022983551], "ccnet_perplexity": [1913.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
James Murphy vs. Elias T. Aldricb.-Action OF
trespa damages f TIC alleged orcble taking
Of liquors and other articles, by Mr. A. creditor from
the store OF plaintiff, l9 Washington street (aready referred
to The defence 49, that the goods taken By request OF
Nurphy.-Verdict for defendant


VIM. J. Burrett vs. l.. c. Confederation for


be, damages laid at sl00Ohe parties are druggists IN
this city. hlr C. manufactured article called Hays Lin!
nen, and the same article was also manufactured and sold By
Mr. Bprit Mr. c. claimed exclusive rght 10 the recipe and
caused SAID advertisement TO be inserted newspa
Mt Buffalo called the Buffalo Daily Sentinel headed Be-
wnre OF Thief and stating that MS Hay Lnnsnt had been
stolen by Mr. Il. From the testimony presented II appeared


that the COPY of the advertisement furnished 10 the paper was
in M C. hand writing and he was aware OF Is being insert
cd. THIS in Nlny 1870 The agreement with the agest OF


Mr.. G. nt the advertisement should be inserted
but 1t continued only months. which time the pupe.
glon true that Mr. g. really used the recipe cniued
belonging, of right TO . c. The will be continued
thus forenoon.