Common Pleas.
{"character_count": 1711, "word_count": 309, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9539999961853027], "ccnet_perplexity": [1826.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
before Judge lngNs


MARCH ~ --Vdimshy VS.. Crty-After counsel had
summed up his Honor charged the jury lie said the case
tried before, and there difficulty about the
verdict and it became necessary TO try again He then
the history OF the case and going over the
evidence whs great mnuieness the only question for
the jury was whether Mr. Grey the defendant was enti
edto credit for the Ss3 that s If hew entitled 70 ere
dit for his general account against the hrm OF
Walmsey then they should only find Tor the palntih the
dderenc. between that and the sum for which the
ton is brought. .aU 80


The jury retired and shortly after returned with
dict for plaintiff for S62


Sanuei .acke,iy Michael Hnshss--This action
TO recover $40 proportion OF quarters rent Of house
in street The plaintiff let the premises in question
TO defendant for year to commence from Ist May,
Is43 5000 year, before the first quarter expired,
the premises burnt down. The agent Of !be plain.
n called Hughes, and told him II he would agree
pay the up the time OF the fire. he would take the
premises of his hands, rebuild H. and, IL he choose he
might afterwards have IT, To this proposition, IL is al
legged Hughes agreed, but afterwards refused pay.


Mr.. Jsnning the plaintiffs agent, was produced for
plaintiff and proved the letting OF the premises TO defend
ant and also the subsequent agreement nude by Hughes
to give up the premises and pay the rent
For the defence IL In contended that II wns part oi hc
agreement that Hughes should be paid for re-
moined the premises, and for some repairs whch ne
caused to be made.


The care WINS not closed when the Court adjourned


w. X. Thorn for plaintiff; Mr. Norton Tor deiehdant