{"character_count": 1472, "word_count": 237, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8896999955177307], "ccnet_perplexity": [1971.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 4 PieksCiekiaN ESpleWGtiOss-Th Richmond Enquirer contains correspondence between Mr. Thomas Ritchie, It., and Mr. c. G. 0FiSwold, which furnishes abeautifnl illustration of the nice distinctions. of chiyalsy. MT. Griswold, 1t seems made came offensive remark during . political speech, and Mir. ,Ritchie addressed him. in note, thus :-

 "Sirs--Wiil yodd dUme the favor to state wheth- CT the remark you made in your speech yesterday, which escaped my attention, 'that you were speak. ing to the honest country people of Chesterfield, and not to the editors of the Enquirer, w1sintend. ed to be personal to myself. CT either ofthe editors of that paper P

 MIsGriawoldsspliss<-

 -"At the time of your interruption of me, 1 did not knotksyou personally. and SO could not then havs'intended any personal disrespect tOyou indi. vidually. Lcertainly did inteHa the remark q dss respectful tothe editors of the Enquirer editors -as such aloneT know 'thesn."

 This nicedistinctionis6ttsee the pes0O1 and the editor was quit AalisiaetGgy. The insult was in- tended oaly in the RiekwiekiAn ssnse-Ra1G

 '''AEsh dsaf,' '@sa1 sVHgkiah hnshand Co hiS wife. ssifl were in your plnce IWOuldR't keep that babe co full nf butter ss you ioh Bnater my detr! Ii never give it any bdtter.n !" No, but yo0 poured about quart Gf milk down lt fhis afternoon, end then trsttsdit eHthsAhee tOs nsaklytw0 h0as. If it dsasnt contain gaanlty of fhltsr ky this tine, C isn't Co w1nE ofekuEIing.s