To this letter Mr.. Holmes replies m. ~ '0-'-'i'
{"character_count": 1934, "word_count": 340, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9348000288009644], "ccnet_perplexity": [1502.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
H..


II. ~ GUNNER.
To this letter Mr.. Holmes replies


GENTLEMEN:-I have just received your letter.
in which two queries are distinctly put, and as
distinctly viii Ireply.


lat. l am in favor of the election of Mr. Poll.
and Mr.. Dallas, and am decidedly of opinion ,ha,
South Carolina ought to vote for them.


Cd. hare no doubt Of Mr.. Polk's Sincerity
,oaen he declared his oppOstian TO the entire sys
tenn of protection, and !, elected, he ,oiN endeasor
TO subrert 1t.


Having answered your questions, might here
stop, but may be permitted to express my sur
prise, that any doubt should have existed Of my
wishing success TO the "Anneratioa Candi
date" as deem the incorporation of Texas into
this Union az pital, and the only hope now en-
fertain of adding that great and valuable Terrific.
ry to our Confederate Empire, is through the sue
cess of the Democratic party.


With Erea, respect. your obi servant:


|. E. HOLMES
We call the attention Of PENNSYLVANIA to this
development. Nay, We ask all who believe that
some sort of Protection of our Industry is proper
and beneficial, to consider what this advocate of
Folk says OF his Candidates position and opinions
Head Men OF Newark and Lynn, of Lowell and
Pittsburgh. read, Laborcrs, Farmers, Artisans,
every where and judge whether they are no,
perpetra,ing most impudent fraud who tell YOU
that Polk is in favor of Protection.


O'Hon JOHN w. DAVIS, NJ. c. from Indiana,
writes to the Plebeian staggering letter, dat
ed Carlisle, Indiana, July 90, which closes
please mark wha, tell you-eny Clay rerc did rece,,
''' " 1'N"A a'A 'eser s''4jt JoaN oiatNSSW w YpaTls.
We beg leave to inform this Hon. ignoramus
that Indiana did vote for Henry Clay the first
time they ever had chance (n 1924 , and we
have no doubt he is just as much out of his re-
'ckonlng IN the future in the past.


DThe Albany Argus denies-of course, 8 BY
Anthority'-tha, Gov. Bouck has determined to