sVFRENE CouRr-Nos. l, ,, 3, /, 9S, 5, 81, 8, IL

ClRCurr CorRr. Relnre Indigo kent.
{"character_count": 797, "word_count": 140, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9264000058174133], "ccnet_perplexity": [1938.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
'ikCUTT COURT. Before Judge KENT
L. " NJ Hoffman Us. Thomas Briggs and Joseph
o0'e The plaintiffs in 1871 received from Brsg,
Voe io S'2, endorsed by gentleman named Gdrdiuer
protested and recourse had TO the endorser. who de-
N "S signature 10 b. forgery aud catered complaint
ss.'' 1'isss al the Police Office, IN arrangement was
ucs Sy which Briggs pay $500 m cash and $500
a1e" note which, compared leave the parties


less the S1tO ad. This note also lay over, and the
e TO recover S2O Moore that the firm dis
vioIe the rss note became due which BnSSs agreed
NET and that BY plaintiffs taking anew mote from Briggs
ooEe) was absoved from the contract; The Court and
cal cSr thought otherwise. Verdict for plaintiffs.


'"eRT OF COMMON rLEAS..., Before judges III
saoGFggS lNGLIs and lNGRAuAM.