{"character_count": 2226, "word_count": 402, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9739000201225281], "ccnet_perplexity": [744.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Why did not the Banner say that the Cour adjourned for dinner to afford Mr. Johnson an opportunity to reply to Dr. Gibson, bu did not adjourn on the next day, to give Dr Gibson chance to reply to Mr. Johnson Perhaps Il was not convenient--and it mas 6e, that 1t Was not considered polite.

 s4rkansas Ga2eAe

 We did not say SC, because it would have been untrue We do say, however, that the Court did ad- journ, on Monday, to afford Dr. Gibson an opportu- nity to speak, and that the Dr. spoke nearly toa. hours. After Dr. Gibson had concluded, Judge Caldwell answered him, in speech about an hour and half long and, then, MT. Trapnall spoke about the same length of time, consuming the re- mainder of the day. The next day the Court ad Jouraed for about faco hours, including Me time fof dinner; during which Mr. Johnson delivered his speech That these arc the facts, fairly stated, every person present, Whig and Democrat, will bear usl witness. Thus, even if the Court had adiournedE on Tuesday, for the space of four hours, for the special purpose of afording Mir. Johnson an oppor- tunity to speak, it would have done nothing moreE for him than it had done for Dr. Gibson, the day be- fore. But it did 10 suca thing On "Wednesday, wei lcft Benton, and have no personal knowledge of what was done; but we have good authority for saying that the Court did adjourn on that day--that Dr. Il Gibson did have ia chance to reply to MT. Johnson that proclamation ,cas made at the Court-housel door that the Dr. would speak, but the people d ao come to hear him. So much for the assertion that the Court did not adjourn on Wednesday. We sub- ! nit then, to any candid man, if we were not rights in saying that although Dr. Gibson promised to reply to MT. Johnson, he ti,iied to do so. His reasoas good and sufficient ones, doubt, must be inferred from the facts

 The charge of policy" and untairncss, in thisE matter, which the Gazette meanly iasiauatts against the Court for not adiournng is sufficiently rcpelled by the character of JUDGE CLEspEys1x, without awozd from us.

 Truly neishbor. you have been peculiarly unfor- tunate in selecting material out of which to manu- taeture persecution capitol for Dr. Gibson Try agan