{"character_count": 1279, "word_count": 208, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9280999898910522], "ccnet_perplexity": [808.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
INDIcATIoNs.-We learn, from good authority that the following U. 5. Senators, viz SEWER and FULTON, of Arkansas. FLANAGAN, of Indiana, SEM PILE and BREEZE, of Illinois, AcHIsoN, of Missouri, WALKER, of Mississippi, HAYWOOD, of North Ca rolina, and McDUFF1E and HUGER, of South Caro- lina are firm in the belief that the annexation Treaty should be ratified forthwith; and that the interest of the Democratic party requires Martin Van Burea 10 be dropped and some other individual to beadopted as the candidate of our party.

 The "Boston Post, = hitherto one of Mir. Van Bu- rens earnest advocates, is now of opinion that the interest of the Democratic party requires that he shall not be our candidate in the ensuing Presden- tal election

 The "Pennsylyanian," the leading Democratic paper in Pennsyltania and hitherto the principal advocate of.Mr. Van Bufen's pretensons in that State has come out in favor of taking up some other candidate

 The "Richmond Enquirer" /" hitherto the leader in Virginia, and the abcstadyocate of Mir. Xan Buren, iii the Union. is now for immediaie aaaerafioa, and in favor of relieving the Virginia delegates to the Democratic National Convention from any. obliga- ton to support Mir Van Buren,

 BRUrUs," number ?, was received too late for

 