{"character_count": 1819, "word_count": 298, "ccnet_language_score": [0.963100016117096], "ccnet_perplexity": [1247.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
have now gone through with my analysis of this
most extraordinary document | leave it to my
readers to determine whether have shown, as
purposed doing. that the report contains garbled
statement of facts that the conclusions and infer
ences drawn are unfounded; and that the charges
made against Col. Sewer, both directly and indi.
rectly, are ungenerous, unfounded, and unjust.


Will an enlightened community so far disregard
the great obligations of truth and Justice, and be
so guided by bitter partizan prejudice, as TO do
justice to fellow citizen who asks it at their
hands ! Refuse new trial to him who had been
once tried, acquitted and discha rged honorab!y.
but who in his absence is again put upon trial for
the same offence, and without notice, condemned
unheard Shall a Judgment rendered under such
circumstances be deemed TOO sacred to be opened?
Shall report, every way unus. and ungener.
Gus in its statements. and misstateme nts Of facts
in its unfounded charges. and differences, and
groundess, accusations, be suffered to blacken the
reputation of faithful public servant who asks
fair and open investigation Of the whole subject.
when he may be heard in his own defence?


TO their credit be it spoken, Messrs. Gaines
and Banes, who signed the report, as well as Mr.
McClain, who voted for it, disavowed the uniust
and libelous conclusions contained in it. Unfor,u-
nately those conclusions are on the Legislative re-
cords of the State. apparently endorsed by these
gentlemen in their votes while their dsavowals
do not accompany the documents This fact above
all Others shews the necessity ola re-inves,igation;
that the subject may be properly placed before
the people.


| now leave the subject for the consideration
and determination of candid, generous and en-.
Ightened community.


JUSTICE.