Mr. HENRY
{"character_count": 1478, "word_count": 253, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9768000245094299], "ccnet_perplexity": [1027.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Wilmington Chronicle charges that Mr..
Henry voted in Sampson county at the late Presi-
DENTAL election. We have eEqnired of members.
of the Bar who have pracllced in Sampson and
learn these to be the facts: That it has been a
practice in Sampson to allow all persons who
.svere qualified 20 vote in the State, and who did
not reside in Sampson, but were attending Court
there the day of the Presidential elections whether
wagoners, suitors, witnesses or lawyers both wings
and democrats, to vote in Sampson; and that this
was allowed and permitted by common consent of
bothparties at the late election when the wagoners
suitors and witnesses of both parties from other
counties voted without challenge or objection on
either side. There is then nothing unfair in this


when both parties are allowed the same privilege
it defrauds no body nor party. We have also
ascertained upon enquiry, that DIR. DANIEL b.
BAKER, the whig Elector and townsman of the
Chronicle, voted once at the Presidential election
in Sampson whilst attending Court there. Mr.. Ba-
ker will not deny this. It is known too, that the


late Alexander Troy, also on one or two occa-
sions, voted at the Presidential election there MIR.
Troy was Solicitor of that Circuit, and we learn
that he was a gentleman of the most scrnpuions
honor, and he, as States officer. had taken an
oath to support the Constitution. Fire again, MIR.
Chronicle, and wound your own townsmen and
fellow wings. North CGrOtiniGn.