Superior Court.
{"character_count": 1057, "word_count": 179, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9587000012397766], "ccnet_perplexity": [1427.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
beIOTe ChItI JUSTICE JoneH.


DEc. .6-.5mos Bailey u.s. Winsiow Whiting and Fred.
a. Msr.-Ths action OF assumps brought to re-
bond given by defendants in order to release
the property OF third party from attachment Itap
peared in evidence that the ls OF April lS42 proms-
tor $49b drawn by DIM. Wilcox the order
Of his father Ezekiel Wilcox and endorsed by the latter
The notes having subsequently been protested the
dorser living at Rockaway, New Jersey his property in
this State was attached when defendants rendered bonds
for plaintiff pursuant to statute for tine
any loss which they might sustain. The note coming
into plaintiffs possession, this suit instituted
to recover the amount with interest from the
bondsmen. Defence offered that no legal demand
had been made to the endorser for the amount Of the
long to the endorser-but had been assigned to him by
the son, to him endorsements made subse
quenty to the endorsement of the note in question Ad
journed until this forenoon.


A. Allen and H. Allen, for plaintiff C. A. Peabody,
for defendant.