Common Pleas.
{"character_count": 1209, "word_count": 216, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9532999992370605], "ccnet_perplexity": [1896.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
DEC. 7-Wm J. Bu,in vs. Lleius s. Cosnstock--The
jury in this found verdict for plaintiff Of $780,


DEcIsIoNs-Joseph W. Hecard ads. James Fhilps-This
was motion to set aside report of on claim
for work done by the plaintiff under contract for build
ing house fer defendant The motion involves no points
either OF interest or Importance Ordered Report OF
ferees confirmed without costs.


George Webb ads Stephen b Hutchines Erecutor &c
This was bill Of exceptions the opinion the Judge
at the trial Of the with the above title presenting
the question of the abyof endorser on promi sory
note The first point 49, that the note having been given
mp the endorser released The second point Of de-
iendant is that the renewed nots upon which was
charge the Of the old note upon which the plain
tfs verdict was obtained This point also offers that
there was not sufficient evidence the case to 70 to the
Jury as to the protest OF certain original note The
Conrt now concur IN all the points noticed In the opinion
of the first judge which opinion the exceptions are
taken except much the second point as holds that
there was not suiciency of evidence &c as noticed
above, and order new trial, with costs to abide ts