{"character_count": 1190, "word_count": 208, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9664000272750854], "ccnet_perplexity": [1006.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
IRISH REPEAL, AND so FORTH We have received
a communication from an 'Irshman, signed ''Saars-
field" in relation to some illusions made by Mr.
Woodruff in speech reported in the Herald, in
reference TO the objects Of the Irish repealers in
this country, and other matters. We do not think
it necessary to publish this reply. This journal is
record of events-facts-the history Of the time
no.. vehicle of controversy. If the Irish repeater
who has forwarded this reply for an insertion
tin our columns, wants torebut the statements
Of Mr. Woodruff, let him go over to Brooklyn to
the repeal meeting on Monday, and make his re-
ply there, and if the repealers have the poteness
to accommodate the gentlemen of the press,
we shall probably send reporter there,
and give Saarsfed's" speech in the He
raid. This is the only way in which his reply
can appear in our columns. II the repealers think
that they quite right, and that OConnells pro-
jec.s are all just and defensible-ln which we don't
at all agreelet them show it at their public meet
ings. Besides, it would be much more manly for
"Saars6ed" torepy in person, on public platform,
to Mr.. Woodruff, rather than in an anonymous
letter.