{"character_count": 1465, "word_count": 258, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9800000190734863], "ccnet_perplexity": [1293.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mr. Bro,0nson The Raleigh Register "com-
mends" to us, in tone of exultation, certain re-
marks lately made by ME Brownson in deroga-
ton of Mr.. Van Buren and the democratic party
In reply we say, the character of Mr.. Brownson
is well known to the American democracy; they
have had their eyes upon him for some time; and
whatever he may be in the estimation of the Fed
eralists, he is not still laboring in behalf of the
democratic party" We speak advisedly, and we
know the tree by its fruits. We distinctly re.
member that in 1840, Mr.. Brownson was quoted
as good democratic authority in North Carolina;
and through that good democratic authority and


The influence given to it by unprincipled Federal
1emagogues, votes were either neutralized or lost
% the democratic cause. Mr.. Rayner, now
member Of Congress, had hand in this thing;
and even now his cheeks ought to tingle with
shame foEthe little and unfair deed Mr.. Brown
son was quoted as the opponent of the laws of in
heritance, and heldSupas as the advocate of total
and universal dissolution of the matrige ties and


hen the dernagogues would shed crocodile tears
and tell ofthe utter desolation which the democra


tic party were about to bring upon the country!


Mr. Brownson may be-perhaps he is-a very
good Federal Whig; but he is very bad demo
:rat In this great contest "he that is not for us
IS against US; and he that gathereth not with usr
'cattereth abread."> Is the Register satisfied