THE TRIBUNE

a sIsnder Refuted.
{"character_count": 2126, "word_count": 386, "ccnet_language_score": [0.933899998664856], "ccnet_perplexity": [1862.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
From Tie Pleoe,Gn Of Saturday.


PISS THEM ALONG The New. Haven Register says :


is t %hSS 6 spose en' WeeS


d Of h waSns as @ 9s ,ssl psmo1rG @ Pro they dis
sesion and they would make Loco Foco of him. This
sSa.o Woo sss
perhsps they don't wish TO sell lher carriages Democrats
IOs Do well TO call and put the question to them beios pa
thanpg their carriages"


u We happen to have the means of mailing
this electioneering calumny at once. Here ere
the documents:


BkIpeEeoRT, Oct 3lst, 1874
TSas Editor Of The Tribune


Having to-day read in the "Democratic Banner"
published in Stamford, CT. a false and slanderous
report in relation 10 Messrs TomliDson & Wood,
Carriage Makers, Of this place And whereas il is
th.re stated shat those gentleman lately discharged
from their employ one james Lambert, for having
been seen in company with his brothers OF New
Canaan in a Democratic Procession at Bridgeport
We therefore, the subscribers journey man carriage
makers, of both political parties, Democrats and
Wings, beg 10 stale through your paper in CONTRA
dc,ion 10 the statements n the Democratic Banner,
that we are acquainted with the circumstance Of
Mr. Lanb-r's ieavins The employ Of slessrs. 'Fom
losOu, wood & Co. and that the suhj+c Of politics
and political professions mad no connexion with it
on ,n-r par but that Mr.. Lambert applied first 10
,nem TO engage him STEADY work for the winter,
having previously, as he stated, got n job with Mr..
I.asc Ford, OF New York, if he chose, for steady
work He was ioId ny them that ha could have
work win them If he ui>ned, the same as h4 had
been doing bur il he coud do better in New York,
il wand be disapp niuent 10 hem. the de-
m.nd for work was then slack, upon which he left
We would farther state that he jonrue, ,men in th-
employ OF He.srs. Tninl,oson, Wood g. Co. ere
composed Of m.u ot different pol'lc ii principles
and that we have never known any cisuucin
parJiality heir part cn that account to~sTd any
one, and We Big TO assure The public that however
much we m4y disagree in politics. we are all agreed
ia saliog aud maintaining truth sgainst ialsehood