{"character_count": 1078, "word_count": 197, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9754999876022339], "ccnet_perplexity": [1397.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
u A gentleman has suggested to rs, that the
quotation from Dr. Chanting in our article on an
international Copy right Law yesterday might
be taken as if we We're willing ,that foreign Ma
tons should do our spinning any weaving, If we
were only allowed to 90 our own thinking. We
do not think it possible man who has sense
enough to see the argument at all, could fall
into such stupid error. He would be htera-
list indeed--one who had a rare faculty to un-
derstand the power of words, without compre-
hending the scope of thought The whole ar'-
Gle is entirely destitute of force except on 'he
doctrine of :. Protection" and the quotation tssii
pointless except on the acknowledged lncalcnia-
Bile Importance of protecting our own Manuiac-
lures. 1t is as If one had shown beyond the
power of contradiction that we should "sp'n and
weave" for ourselves if we would prosper as a
Nation, and yet important as it was, foreigners
had better do it for us than do our thinking. If
the choice were left, between the two evils, the
first, great as it would be, were the less danger


