{"character_count": 2989, "word_count": 524, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9484000205993652], "ccnet_perplexity": [1820.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



Nov ~ -DEsisors. Heron, Lees T. Co. vs. The Ship
Grafton Nothing was done by the ship to protect the
hemp alter was landed. 1t Is the and usage
the coasing deliver goods or freight on the wharf
Upon these facts the question Of law arises whether the
ship had fulfilled her contract Of carriage by delivering
the hemp the dock The enquiry to be answered
the assumption that due notice given the consgnees
Of the time and place Of unloading for in the absence
such notice Is clear the ship not acquitted by placing
The supreme Court Of this state decided in coastina
o g s Ga his
ceptsnce delivery, implying mutual acts Of the carrier
and consgnee.


the case gave the following decision I'll decide that all
the hemp removed from the wharf by the carts Of the H.
bellants 10 have been duly delivered.


further decide that hemp damaged on the wharf, wa
not delivered to the ibellants and that they entitled
to recover in this sction lis value.


An order Of reference the clerk will be entered when
evidence be adduced by both parties TO the quant
and value Of hemp LETT the wharf by the side Of the
Bsnjamin Deiane a~d Joshua DsIans vs. George Wnta.
k0.-In this cause the respondents vessel, which had
been chartered by lbeiants, came home without full
cargo the owners OF said vessel conendng that they
were desired to go for cargo up the Lake Maracabo
whereas their charter only othe port Of Msracabo
90, above stated. and the vessel was libelled icr
damages for alleged non.fnlGnent by the vessel
The court decided that the iibellants fulfilled and
performed the engagements ON their part In the
charter party artcled upon in this case, and that
they entitled to recover from the respondent the
Of $3.50 the amount Of freghtment in the said Charter
party agreed upon and stipnsted with interest thereon
Wherefore s ordered and decided that the beants
against the respondents the said several respective
sums Of money together with their costs to betsxed


John Williams and Others vs. I've Brig Oriols.-Lbeed
| for wages Decided in favor Of libellants
Charles Wsa vs. The Ship .Aymar Also libelled for
wagas. Libel dismissed with costs 10 be taxed
Jshn Manuel vs. The ship Martha The ship Martha
lbeed for wages appears that the libsant deserted
the vessel while lay at Liverpool for several days. and
aiter reshiPped for the return voyage The Court de
cedin4 deseron but only for the return voyage from
the time Of his reshipment the l4h Of August last
Therefore s ordered be referred to the clerk uns
the proctors Of the respective parties sdust the amount
between themselves and file stipulation 10 the resu
to enquire and ascertain the amount due to beant upo
the above principles, and IL further ordered that II
balance be found the ibelsnt for his services since
his last hiring that he costs In this suit but other
wise that neither party costs against the other


Marine Court.


Nov. i2-Riey Beman Theephiius .7niheny "a yer.
diet in this case was rendefe Cd for paintif-s25