,nopa /. Free Trade Tariff.
{"character_count": 1678, "word_count": 308, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9689000248908997], "ccnet_perplexity": [1578.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
csk;ngto1 Correspondence " The JoaTndi V Cp"'e''


Tariff bill will II b pro0sSsy Ss has


oortsd to Congless The Chai OF the Comm.Ier
Way; and @ 6s


intel gen, talented men, and disposed 70 present
10 SS the rees tycfsy 05 iu


Every inducement has been held out TO the Penn{ m
and Coal but as yet they have given any intmaon @ a


they would yield do ,Ts within aud eis hase been
served by concession their part than oy attempting "


on to what they have" n


nr This is pleasant fellow, certainly, to talk
of "political trckery." The bill is to be most
judicious, creating Revenue 1arlfi' with q
maximum of 80 per cent, but "the Pennsylvania
Delegation" might hare secured better terms for
the interests of their State if they had given
up their high Protective notions on Iron and
Coal But Aoto better? Are not low ReDenue
duties best for them, according to the Free Trade
theory? And are they not to have these to their
hearts content and shovel full extra Then
how would they have done better by surrender
ing their high Protective notions? Is not the
Committee disposed to do better for them Free
Trade -wise) than it would have done if they had
knocked under? We can't get the hang OF this


But the Free Trader evidently means to amply
that this simple Revenue Tariff is still to be Pro-
tectioe, and might have been more SO on Iron and
Coal, if the Pennsylvanians had succumbed. II
differs, then, from the present Tariff not In KIND
but in degree. 1t allows that duties may be
Protective; the iniquity is having them range
above 80 per cent. And even here point might
be strained to secure the assent of a Delegation
A pretty fellow this to talk of political rickery