a mi,take-there were but litle ovcI loO-Ed Irlb
{"character_count": 1813, "word_count": 329, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9848999977111816], "ccnet_perplexity": [1418.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



Is not this conclusive against the use which
the Loco.Foco papers arc trying to make of the
result of our Charter contest There are ust
two material errors in it, which nearly neutraze
sach other In the first place there were not
5000 voters naturalized this Spring, but little
over 1000; and, secondly, there were at least
1000 illegal votes pollcd last Spring and over
5000 this Spring, nearly all for the Loco-Foco
dckets Coddington has not over 10000 good
legal votes this Spring, of which fully 500 were
cast by Wings to defeat Nativism, and over H.
900 by Adopted Citizens, who voted as they
thought most likely to effect the same end, though
the bulk of them in accordance with their Pohtl-
cal bias. There were not over 5000 legal votes
cast for Coddngton by Americans born, or about
the same as were cast for Franklin That is the
true state Of the case How much can Loco Fo.
coism make out oft


Be it remembered, too, that the $4,000 original
Wings who voted for Harper were voting for a
Wing, and the only one they could hope to elect,
while the majority of their journals told them that
this was the right course-that it would have no
political consequences, except 10 PROSTATE Loco
Focoism and secure City Reform. Thousands of
them have no idea of joining the new party or
adopting its sentiments. But the 5000 Loco
Focss who voted for Harper thereby renounced
and condemned their old party, voting for a
Wing in preference to highly respectable Van
Buren candidate, who stood good chance of
election. They voted to turn their own party out
of power; the Wings roere out, and voted SO
as to put part of their men in. Is not here a
broad difference2 Is it not obvious that, in its
triumph as well as its origin, the American Re.
publican party has been mainly indebted to the
ranks of the Democracy