{"character_count": 2523, "word_count": 451, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9593999981880188], "ccnet_perplexity": [1733.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
handed over; and gentlemen you determine, alter
this question: whether the money was deposited
The question here, then to whether that
legal There two defences here. One is that other
persons were interested in this case with respect ths,


point suppose the law TO be thisf other persons
interested they to be considered princi
pal and the would be decided in this way that the
party interested was moral agent The has
been decided by the Supreme Court The other point
Of defence urged is, that IL Is ha case where stake
holder is made liable can find anything to sanction
this opinion. In England. In the reign OF Charles the
Second all gambling declared 10 be illegal In the
reign OF George the Second. thes allowed racing fore
ot ESQ., to favor the rich gamb or Il presumed II
lad down then that where stakeholder held bets
that not legal in par dcio he was not liable, bu'
in coming to 9th Term Reports s5, s laid down
pressly where stakeholder pays over the money with
the consent Of the loser he not entitled 10 recover
He receives the money in the FIRST instance In hls own
wrong and the present statute declares n stakeholder
receives money, receives II in his wrong ani
suppose the object OF the Legislature to ~ th
statute And when they 20 further, and declare the
winner should recover the sum, the law has de
olared in words which cannot be mistaken, that
4 was the stockholders duty not TO receive any
moneys on such transaction. The question then J,
unless here be in the Is the de-
fendant responsible for the money How much Of this
he is liable for and what amount plaintiff is entitled 10
recover lie s not emitted 10 recover the sum oil S5O
deposited by Crosby as shown IN evidence nor the sun
OF 500 deposited by English and also any other sums 50
deposited, us appeared by the testimony


The jury withdrew and will render sealed verdict
this forenoon


Rossisl's PLAIGIARIsM Mr.. Henri Phillips thu
vocalist, tells good anccdote illustrative OF Roe.


sIni's unbushng appropriations OF other composers


IDEAS TO his own uses. Neukom-we think thai


was the man-went Ia Rome to hear one oi Kos


sinis operas and was as,onlshed to find that every
gem was his own composition, literally lransierrer
TO Rossnl's score The despolrd artist taxed
Rossn with the theft. "CeuaiDly, | admit the,
are your own" said Rossini, "but think much
Of your genius, that cannot iorseer 10 make Us,
Of its productions, and if you think ss highly OF
anything Of mine you may have heard tonight,
you are welcome 70 use H."