Superior Court.
{"character_count": 3345, "word_count": 586, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9678999781608582], "ccnet_perplexity": [1930.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



DEc. flames Fciows aud others vs. Clement e. Chepa-
HtrThis cause was tried short time since in this
The action is brought to the ofseven pro-
MISERY notes made IN 1896 to which the statute OF H.
mutations is pleaded II put in that defendant did
enter the city SO es that writ could have been served
upon him. but kept out Of the way The defence affirmed
that he was frequently in the city end such occasions
frequently passed the store Of plaintiffs Adjourned
c. Roe for plaintiff; o. Bushnell for defendsnt


The Second Chamber Of this Court opened this
morning


Judge Oakley presiding


Nm d. Miller rs. Thomas Bafes.-1his was an action
brought to recover $780, being the amount OF proms
at Baltimore in July, lsl3. The signature admitted
by defendant and plsntif rested his 1t put in
member OF the firm Of w. l. May hsw Co., doing bust.
ness at Baltimore, and defendant engaged in busi-
each other and defendant came nde bted 10 Msyhew
Co. about 81 400 Defendant subsequently became en-
barrassed and could not meet his engsgemsns In June
Ssl he entered into negotiation with william Davis Of
LOUISVILLE and subsequently sold the notes 10 him, taking
IN payment brandy at 81 80 per gallon This negota-
ton was not completed with knowledge of the plaintiff
until Davis had agreed with Bates for the purchase OF
said notes by said Bates Of Davis afterwards defendant
went to Baltimore where he arrested for debt due
to fireman in the city. Being held to bail in the Of
SiGcS deendsa. ss applied to Psna to become his bail
;,a Mn;cn saia P,ain.n nnsy ala IN censaeraon mat
plaintiffs loss in settling the former notes. and
also condition that defendant would place full
security IN the hands Of the plaintiff for the result Of the
suits. Upon of these notes the suit was brought
and the question involved whether there was any





Under the above detailed circumstances the court was
Of opinion that there consideration shown and
verdict was taken for plaintiff subject the opinion Of
the court to be made ont.


Charles II. f. Morning VS.. Garref w. Ryckman-Action
OF replevin to recover damages appeared that the
Sd July, 1913, the plaintiff received quantity Of hops
from Boston, which were shipped the sh from the
Boston vessel on board the ship Sir Isaac Newton
Hamburg The defendant who il hop inspector of this
state removed the hops from the ship, and had them
ried to his place OF inspection although the property had
besn inspected in Massachusetts. The expenses arising
m tir0 III he Su m nm w
action Is brought The jury rendered verdict for the
plaintiff subject to the opinion Of the court on case TO
be made out.


n. d Eliingwood for plaintiff Eddy, for defendant.
Jonathan Douglass vs. H. Thomas.-This was
on brought against the endoser 10 recover the amount
otwo promssory notes. dated LIST OF April 1872 for $4,000
EACH drawn by vm j. Tuney to order Of d. fendant. De-
fence put In that there confederation and that
they are held usurious transactions Plaintiff put in
that the fmsker OF the original note for which the two
notes question given in settling II. represented
that business note having been received for cop
per That these representations said notes sold
ior than per cent taking away defendants
right to plead usury. Verdict for plaintiff $S64 80.


Il. H. kimball for plaintiffs. H. l.. Davis for defendant