Common Pleas.
{"character_count": 1623, "word_count": 275, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9580000042915344], "ccnet_perplexity": [2202.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Before Judge lngraham.


SEpT 2.-Wood VS.. Mtad.-The Jury III this case
ported in yesterdays Herald did not agree and dis
charged


John King William Hathaway-This was an &C
Of assumps brought by ply sican TO recover Tor erv
rendered TO Plaintiffs daughter represented TO have
been interesting ouDg lady, who was affected with
the malady known 81 Vtns Dance. IL appeared that
time the year 1912 the young lady went visit
friend al New Bedford and dent phy sician
enced trying experiments on the lady by the process
Of esmerizng, which gave her temporary relief The
ply sican how ceased 10 operate. the Plaintiff
IN order alleged the defence, 10 learn the
commenced I'll ing experiments the young lady. The
family ails did not dream OF being charg by
the new physician for services, but considered he
mskng the experiment for his ben
eft, continuing his visits Tor period Of tweive
months The young lady, it appeared. wrote
some letters stating she considerably relieved The
operation sometimes performed twice day. Her
iend Mr. Harper, with whom she was residing at the
period of this visit paid appeers 500 to the plaintiff for
services at time and this held view Of
retainer. nonsuit moved on the srourd that the
Doctor not producing his dipoms, regular ply.
sician and that the detendsnt who the lady
Interviewer having reaiped engsged the services Of
the Piaintf-wss not entitled 10 The Court
overruled the objection The jury will render sealed
verdict this forenoon.


WiAiam Finch VS.. Nichols II. Babcock-Ths an
action OF assumpsit $50 95 labor In laying
down the Croton pipes at 81 Avenue and 10Th street Ad
journed