{"character_count": 4521, "word_count": 812, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9488000273704529], "ccnet_perplexity": [1263.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
the convention. ule

 Mr. Jno. Kettlewell. of H.

 reception, responded to these ,''' v. e'i that every possible attention bs9, lsla to this matter, and expressiaa .io f a more suitable place could s. ms And if it could, there was nn Ol @ tifying the members of tbo a0 ln'aa time for their re-assemblinq oS com lected. With regard to tba s' Si Si h1 prevailed, he thought that lba u,sol, the convention might adonl "ls Ss. m ment, would do more to efs eo, than>any increase of space sGs'' fa' :. tions. 'or Is

 ;: A motion was then made at Il adjourn until four o'clock. p Ma carried. ~

 AFTERNOON sEsSov

 The convention met pursnap, aV, ment, at 1 o'clock. The cbairm.ps assembly to order. The first Ial bal the report of the committee oa 0a1a s lions and credentials, but tbs v' U Y that committee not being ready pause ensued, which was emnio' Hammett, of Miss, in soma f,Yta the necessity of excluding from r,'il ,al persons who are not delegates 4, ton. The suggestion was mad. i' that safety which might be enJsn,.a admission of the crowd which yea1. :,l' wise throng the floor. There b,iI1 jj siderable alarm at the Whig con,s.1 consequence of an appreheadej n house, and if aceigM is to be ea''i < view of the subject, certainly tbp~ ]. cause of apprehension from the . s, a] body now present.

 Mir. Ilarker, of the committee If ; stated that arrangements had hoo, ! that effect.

 Blr. Frazier, of Lancaster. boDsl people would be admitted to any n. the hall not occupied by the copvs,1 if gentlemen desired to excludp \ could be better accomplished 5y d, them ill front of the house, ontie @I ciples of the democratic party.

 Mir. Hopkins, of Va, thoughtitu best 10 exclude all persons from he5 entitled to admission as delegates

 It was finally concluded olay t, over until the convention shouEahap on the rules for its regulation.

 Mir. Bredon, of Pa, asked leaveaI for Mir. Frazier, that hemig6taddreaI titade before the house. Granted.

 lIr. Hubbard, chairman of the n on delegations, Sc, rose and staldI absence of the secretary of the conn regretted deprived him ol the use d port, but he was able to state that [ mittee was unanimously of the opnia delegates now present were entitleda that capacity. But a single excen been presented 10 the committee, ant

  in the case of a Mr. Berry, of the \. gation from Mercer county, whoha leeted by the people of that eounH vention, instead of by the State col The committee had also asceraineil were from some of the statesa smalIl ton than they we're entitled tomti. ton, and instanced Louisiana, vii Congressional representation of6, delegation of ,.

 On motion of Mr. Ingersoll, of solution submitted but withdrawn nutes previously by Mr. Bredon, V up, providing for the appointment mittee of one from each State, tO officers for the permanent ofganlail convention. The resolution was and the committe was accordingly in the same manner as that on dl &c., and consisted of the followii men:

 Messrs. Nathan Clifford, of Ne. man, of N. H., - Abbott, of Ma P. Moves, of Vt., Hezekiah Wllan Moves Billiard, of Conn.,, Erastus c N. Y, Jas. NJ. Hartshorn, of NJ Shannon, of Pa, Philip F. Thoma Wm. II. Ross, of Del, Thos. j. of Va, - Blunt, of N. C., Colquitt, of Ga., Peter Williams Q cob Thompson, of Mi, Gilbert ll La, B. Brown, of Tenn, Richard Ky, Edward Cross, of Arkansas, dary, of O., Wm. A. Bowles, of Bucknastar, tf'lll., John Miller, Q rin B. Dibble, of Michigan.

 The committee thus constituted a room in another part of the buid pare their report.

 The chairman of the commlIlel cations then read over the namesd with the report, which was adopie

 An amendment to a resohstion ' been previously offered by Mr. 5 N. O., that the rules and regulation ted by the democratic convenllon' and 1885, be the rules and regulaI convention except as to the appol its officers, was now brought loI elicited a sharp debate.

 Mr. Walker, of Mi, rise to sps motion. He referred to the proc the conventions of '32 and B, as officially in Niles Register. The rule had prevailed on those occa why should t be abandoned no' the results of the deliberations ol ventions, the flag of the dem0clas! Isa s' carried on to victory. The nom on, Gen. Jackson in '32 had been p9 ton, but on the nomination ol lle sident the two-third rule had Oeel and Mir. Van Buren had been cilo'e convention of May 9, 1885, the rule had also prevailed upon a as ie' ton of the vote of the precealn..ss. y. king the nomination by a malorlys.. La aalni1al.r nndnrstond. ihe genIle