{"character_count": 1180, "word_count": 209, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9591000080108643], "ccnet_perplexity": [1267.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}

Tothe Editor Of The Tribune:


Upon recent discussion, it was resolved to refer
the subject to lis author, the Editor OF the Tribune
for consideration and remarks. His proposition Is
in substance as follows:


Whenever couutry produce article as cheapiy as
II can he prodaced other county, not IN dollars anu
cets days abcr th-u is clearly the interest OF suth
country to produce io Itself not import from abroad"
This, as rule, or law, was deemed by some as
erroneous and 10 illustrate it the following propo-
position was presented


Suppose New-Jersey equal to any other State or
Country in the production OF Bread hen, says
the Tribune it is clearly the interest of New-Jer-
sey TO produce Bread.
But suppose, in addition TO this common adyal-
tage, she has preponderating advantage in the pro-
duction OF Hemp, which would enable every one o
its community 10 make clear profit OF ten dollars
Der day, when at the same time in the production OF
Bread but one dollar per day could be realized
would it in this case be as clearly 10 the interest OF
New-Jersey to produce Bread !? Would it not be to
her interest 10 produce Hemp, and exchange this for
Bread Very respectfully, W