{"character_count": 648, "word_count": 119, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9927999973297119], "ccnet_perplexity": [1243.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The RIGHT TO VoTE.-A somewhat singular
has recently been decided at Boston. Ii inv
he question Of right to vote, and dishones
intent on the part OF person voting, being
rear OF taxes, but at the same time creditor
city, Judge Cushman decided that as the d


int had shown that he did honestly design II
city should retain the money due to him


nent OF his taxes, and the city had subse,
responded to that intent by taking it in pa
(wlthout determining as TO the defendants
right to vote, to which however his opinion
there was enough to make il probable that
ant believed he had that right, and theref
charge Of wiltully voting illegally was rebut