Less than Owsley,

454
{"character_count": 878, "word_count": 158, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9818000197410583], "ccnet_perplexity": [1129.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Less than Owsley, 454


Butler (dem.) for Governor received 49,9OS
votes 5,275 less than Owsley, & 1921 less Dixon.
1t is admitted that Diron run the strength Of the
whig party, yet he received 454 votes less than
Orstey--and his vote over Buffers wns only
4,s2l, then why infer that the whig majority is
more than 5,275 the majority Of tie whig can
d'date who received the largest number Of votes.


In the election of Gov. lO5, l9l votes were poll.
ed; for Lieut.. Governor only 96,72S. S.463 votes
less ;han were poIled for Governor. If Opsley
was so unpopular in the whig party, why did mol
some of the S,463 voters who would not vote for
Pitcher the democratic candidate vo,e for Diron
the ~hg! If any of them had been wings, they
certainly would have voted for their popular whig
candidate. Ows!ey's was the largest whig vote
and therefore is the test of the whg strength.