{"character_count": 1747, "word_count": 307, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9642000198364258], "ccnet_perplexity": [1352.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
There 10 no election. by the people, Of Presidential
Escos have therefore estimated the popular vote In
giving majority OF IS OO0,ws probably below the
mark The present Legislature was elected expressly to
for Polk and there gle whg in that Assem-
bly, At the last election in the Sate The wings attempt
ed only Congressional district, and they
there poled but 1904 votos In Charleston they attempted
to ell Ct members to the Legislature, and were signaly
deeaed In the aggregate popular vote we also think
we are on the safe ~ Q, by giving low estimate 10
1882, when the null l6caon excitement was at Its highest
point the State the whole vote poed reached 9066
Therefore in giving increase o Is 600 in twelve ears
certainly within bounds, when take the in.
crease in other States into consideration.


The aggregate vote is estimated the msory is taken
from the returns received.


1t is claimed by the wings that the frauds in Plaque
mnes the part Of the democrats defeated them in the
State. They contend that the fraudulent votes
that parlRn thrown OUT the ctuto wOuld show whig
majority o 800 The majority for Polk, with the Plaque
mines returns 60 and the increased democratic vote
in that parish 10 757. Throw out the whole in.
crease therefore. and the wings would have majority
Of only 81 The democrats however will admit that
there have been any frauds they that in
quence of the wings prematurey closing the polls in
New Orleans those who did vote there had right
In any part OF the county, end hence the increase in
Paquemines They have objections to an investigations
and II 10 had It will undoubtedly be that Polk
has majority.


AooREoArE VoIE IN THE UNION.


Aggregate vote in 1884,. .4............... 2,743,sA


in lS4O. 4O2, 300