The NcM ,ScVscy Case.
{"character_count": 1089, "word_count": 203, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9578999876976013], "ccnet_perplexity": [1885.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mr.. Clay, in his Raleigh speech, speak
ing Of the outrage by the locos III Con-
grcss IN this case, says:


in the New jersey case, il was impor-
lant TO the dominant party to enable it to
retain lis majority 10 exclude the whig
members. although returned according to
law. The decision in both cases was
adapted to rhe cXgency Of PARTY, IN L T.
TER CON1 ENpr, BOTH OF con-
SllTUTION and LAW"


FoTERs OF MARYLAND! let it not for
one moment be lost sight of, lhat Mr..
CARROLL, the IocoIoco candidate for
governor, and who is supported almost on
tho exclusive ground of his being a moral
and religious man, SWORE TO ST P
PORT TIE CONSTITUTION AND
THE LAW. whIIc a member of that Con-
gress, and yet his name is enrolled as one
of those who thus put all law and con-
stitulon aside, and evidently lost sight of
his high moral obligations, by voting to
exclude the whig members of N Jersey
from their sea's " ere it but for this
high-hnnGed act of POLITICAL iNFA-
MY alone, Mr.. Carroll should be visited
by the indignant rebukc Of every honora-
bic minded man in Maryland!


american Hhig,