VICE CHANCELLoR'S COURT. Before Hon. WM. 7.
M'InIN. Wee CLnnctllpr
{"character_count": 2446, "word_count": 468, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9616000056266785], "ccnet_perplexity": [2270.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



HENRY ID. CEUGEE RS. GEORGE DOUGLAS, HAIR
R,rr ID. CRUsgR and oh,rs.-HARRIgr ID. CRuGER CS
ilESRY ID. CnUGER.--iiIIL AND CROSS ms case
to pace his wife the hamGs oil Trustees Ia" her
personal benefit. not sgne appears MI alter The mar
rage ceremony lad been peIloed but vas perfected s
It's cnn,ended. therefore, That there was no
anti nup,al settlement. This den!ed by MIS- CiCger. WIN
that merely peec,ins tie ns'eemenl made before
marriage Ia part OF her answer, She says ANA tis tie
DISCUSSIONS in which neither recede: IN my degcc from
opposing opinions, snd complainant lMr nj the cy "i
time upon an evening IN the month OF Nov 1922 did whist
with this deendnnt. and several other persons pm
per- which eudI.c, pencil writing. lNe your
huppiness. aud within which written IN pencil wiins


for the joint use Of the pures and of the sur


y0e IN e.s a,s e,s RI ] = he s noen .H m nc
be disposed OF by 'he ndy either 1y dsei "a g @ "s py y W." @
pears. visit 10 London IN winch city The late partner
Of her father Nj, shaw. resided Mr. CraseT also visited Eng
land. and met her London Ms C., N her answer. also
states that ui,e the nigh, which above paper had
been placed her hand her,e md Mr. Crusrr had several
conversations on the subject aud she refused to ake a uc
ageemea the control OF her property To any rson
whatever aud whilst still IN London IN le. he up all


and agreed II she would marry him. her @pery
should be vested trust ur her: but dong would ook
like ofcondence. he wished her TO requiring the
settlement Ill aite instead OF before their beng mlrrled-
ii was 10 he binding and according 10 the of New York
dn iurer that size never would have agreed 10 marry MN
ne well knew unless he had previously agreed TO SETTLE
ment OF her estate upon her,


The reading Of the IestmGny had been concluded the asso
in which he spoke for some time He alluded among e
to the tact of the settlement having been made on Mrs Cger
band has power make posnupiia settlement his wife
which will be binding, yet the instrument slvento Mrs Crree
Hv0 under the statute OF frauds OF this state no cnnsdera
ton avng been stated the agreement to have been given u
aand Dir. Cuger entitled. therefore under the rights OF
iaee the whole of his wifes Property In relation 10
the bill which Mrs asserts TINT she had been induced
rive an N order M q. iced Tor MI o'Gs eeee n os n
hay say,ns beer and therefore nS bnSs % e P s &
T. Will reply Tuesday