{"character_count": 2797, "word_count": 478, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9847999811172485], "ccnet_perplexity": [442.79998779296875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
On the second ballot, CHARLES STEWART had one vote; and on the third, LEVI WooD- BURY had two.

 After the seventh ballot, the Ohio delega- ton feeling that injustice had been done to a majority of the Convention by the operation of the two-third rule,

 Mr. Bartley, as their Chairman, moved to rescind it. He advanced the motion at considerable length, taking much the same ground as had been before taken in opposi- ton to the resolution, and urging its resci- sion with great zeal.

 Much excitement followed, and the Pres ident decided that vote of two-thirds was necessary for the adoption of the motion.

 RIr. McNulty, of Ohio, appealed from the decision of the President, and after speak ing for some time upon the appeal, gave way for motion to adjourn, as the excitement had become so intense and the confusion so great that it was found utterly impossible to transact business.

 And the Convention adjourned until o'clock Wednesday morning.

 WEDNESDAY MORNING, May 20.

 The Convention assembled at o'clock, and the question being on the appeal of the gentleman from Ohio, (NIr. McNulty,) from the decsiomof the Chair, after some remarks from Mir. Bartley, of Ohio, the appeal was withdrawn, and the resolution upon which ii arose was suffered to lie on the table.

 A motion was then made to proceed to another ballot.

 Mr Tibbatts, of Ky, said the delegation from that State had been instructed to use all honorable exertons to secure the nomination of Cols Johnson, and as the Wings had taken their candidate from Kentucky, the Democ- racy of that State had hoped that this Con- vention would have selected another distin- gushed citizen of that State as their standard bearer in the coming contest, but himself and colleagues were now satisfied that the candl- date of their choice, could not receive two thirds of the whole number of votes, and as they desired to do every thing in their power to effect compromise and promote the sue cess of the Democratic party, they should withdraw all preference, and now vote for some other candidate.

 Mr. Brewster, of Pennsylvania, spoke at some length, in relation to the peculiar posi- ton which the Pennsylvania delegation occu- pied in the present crisis, reviewing the his tory of the proceedings of the party in that staie and deprecating the division which for the last lhiee ballots had existed ill the dele ton Ga portion of them having voted for Mr Buchanan Pennsylvania first choice was James Buchanan, but after the withdrawal ol that pure patriot and high minded man, she had in her last 4th of March Convention ln- strueted her delegates to vote for Martin Vrn Buren. Every delegate had been pledged to carry out those instructions and wo to that man who dared to disobey them.

 He had been asked to explain the position