Court OF Common Pleas.
Before Judge ULsHoETrRR.
{"character_count": 809, "word_count": 142, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9559000134468079], "ccnet_perplexity": [1489.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
SATURDAY. NOV. ..
SHARP PRAcTIcE.-Pooley VS. Pentz-This was
motion on the part OF the defendant inside inquest
Il seems that an affidavit Of merits had been duly put the
llsuai FORM but the attorney or the plaintiff JoHS H. POWER
Es1 examined the roll OF CouneloB Of the Court, aud
finding thereon the name OF the defendants Counsel took
the defendant on. o the regular order the
calendar.


The Counsel for defendant held that according to the rules
of the Court The advice of Counsel might my Coun
sci and as the affidavit put by the Attorney such Coun
could no, be said pmctce in the Court within the meaning
oppressive practice. But his Honor the Judge decided ha
although the Counsel was daily admitted nthe supreme Court
yet the affidavit Irregular but allowed the defendant
In amend on paygent of costs