Common Pleas.
{"character_count": 1476, "word_count": 256, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9797000288963318], "ccnet_perplexity": [1495.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
before JuORe lnBTbnam


Nov. H. John Mayer and his tDis Carl Sehmhasner.
This was action Of trespass to recover damages ior
SANDER alleged to have been committed in the beginning
Of December, lS42 1t appeared that defendant had
the day formerly mentioned in the hearing Of two wit
said that he had lost money and plaintiffs
wife was the person who had taken il away Defence
been told him. Verdict for plaintiff $25.


John A. steenmler for plaintiff; T.. f. Buhler for de-
fendant


Melodies S. Heydnger Nicholas Nc Grsu.-This was
action Of assumps to the value Of quantity
OF marble slabs for table tops It appeared that the plain
tiff had sgent who transacted business for him, and
occasionally took merchandise furniture in exchange
for the marble he disposed Of That when DEFENDANTS
foreman came for the marble, he told plaintiff that this
agent and defendant had made arrangement about the
paying Tor the marble. Plaintiff said II was all right,
without making enquiry to what that
was (athough his agent and him had misundersand
ing at the me) That the value of the marble was $780,
500 Of which paid in furniture 10 PLAINTIFF agent
Defence put in that this agent in the habit Of
ransacng business for his that principal must
be LIABLE and consequently that said agent took this
furniture, o. the value Of 500 part payment for the
marble plaintiff must agree to the arrangement. Verdict
for plaintiff $4S so. G. B. Roe for plaintiff and Brady
and Maurice, for defendant.