From the Richmond Enquirer.

REVOLUTION OF THE POLITICAL

 WHEEL.
{"character_count": 2478, "word_count": 426, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9614999890327454], "ccnet_perplexity": [577.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
WHEEL.

 The Wings boast, that the recent elections indicate decided and glorious victory off their party i'll the approaching Presidential election. They say, If we go on so-L e. gain in all the States, as we have in those that have lately held their elections, we shall elect Harry of the West by an overwhelming maiorityo This declaration evidences either total incompetency to make true deduc- ton from the most palpable and obvious premises, or determination to brag and boast in the face of facts, and in defiance off truth and common sense. The merest child in Arithmetic can easily relute their eonelu- sion by applying the simplest rules to the elucidation of the problem. The question is, how much have they gained or lost in the popular vote in the several States that have lately voted, commencing with Louisiana, and ending with Vermont? If they have gained enough 10 overcome the sweeping ma iorities against them in 1911 and i842, they have a right to claim the victory Or, if they have not lost in such ratio, compared with the Presidential vote in 1910, as to negative their maiorites, then, in that case, they will have a right to crow. subioin statement showing the Democratic gains or Whig loss es in the eight States Louisiana, N North Ga follna, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Alabama, Missouri and Vermont, as indicated by the late elections in those States, compared with the elections of 1840.

 The comparison with the Presidential election of 1910, is made, because 1t IS more convenient to refer to the returns, and there fore easier to ascertain the actual differences, and because it is just as fair to take those re- turns as any other for, fl the ratio of loss on the Whig majorities of 1910, in the States that have lately voted, be such, as when ap- piled to all the States, 1t would produce a result favorable to the Republican candidate, il is just as fatal to the Whig cause, as fl the ratio of Whig increase in the popular vote since l84l-2, should be too small to neu- tralize the immense Democratic majorities then given Either operation would produce the same substantial result-and both can be easily demonstrated to be equally fatal to the confident anticipations of the Wings

 Statement showing the aggregate vote for President

 and Niee-Presdent, in l340, the Democratic gain

 CT Whig loss in the majorties shown by the

 elections u lS44, and the ratio orrate per centum

 of Democratic gain or Whig loss in the following

 States: