{"character_count": 1759, "word_count": 319, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8959000110626221], "ccnet_perplexity": [1479.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



SUPREME Court OF THe UNITED STATES, Dec. 9.
-G. l. Dulany, Esq OF Virginia, and II w. Da-
Wis, E-q ut ALEXANDRIA, ID y. were admitted AT
iorneys and Counseors of this Court.


No. 9. John McDunough VS.. Laurent Millau-
cause was coaclndcd by Mr. Coke in support OF
the mouon.


No. l5-Johu Lane et al applicants VS.. John w.
Vlch a. Co. Tnis cause was argued by Mr.. Crit
teaden for the appelees. No l9-Tne United
states, plaintiff in error VS.. Richard Delateld -
Tins Case was argued by Mr.. Attorney General tor
the p.aintif IN eror. No. 20--Samuel Swartwout,
(U. - vs. Knowles Taylor, ct al. Oa mo-
uoa oi Mr.. Attorney General, stating that the
matters Ia controversy in this case had been
agreed and settled between the parties, this
OF t. Circuit Court of the Unlted states Tor
the Southern District OF New York was dismissed No.
~ Lessee VI AnSe ica Crogan ct al plaintiff John
Nelson This Cause was submitted to the Court the
record and printed arguments BY Mr. Underwood Tor the
plIinuf No. - Aasos Kendall, plaintiff in error, vs.
Wm. Is. SoRes Ut al. The argument Of this was
commenced by Mr. Dent for piainh in error Adjourn.
ID Till to morrow morning at ii O'Clock.


REV. G. L. ToRREY.-We noticed that upon the
rendition oil the verdict in the case OF this indv-
das motion male by his counsel In arrest Of judg
moiion been filed. The following q copy Of the
notion and reasons


The tSversr by his counsel the Court to arrest
judgment upon the verdict, because


Ffasr indictments do either hat the trn
vefsef "a freeman or slave, aud without su.h
sns hsfei no offence stated under the act Of Assembly
oil 1871, cbap. ID, or any other law OF the State.


Sgcoep Because tn. are in other especs
substantially informal and american
Of De-. 9.