{"character_count": 1530, "word_count": 273, "ccnet_language_score": [0.968500018119812], "ccnet_perplexity": [1185.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
"TTt for tat" We understand Mr. Edward


Stanly-for we did not hear all his speech-stated


to the crowd, and called all present TO bear wit


ness that the Federal speakers were net in the


habit of abusing the democrats; ands confident
did he seem to be of the truth of this statement,
that he was pleased to declare that "even the


North Carolina Standard could not make a re-
spectacle lie on the subject" Now we shall
neither lie about the matter, nor abuse Mr. Stanly


but present the facts Who was it that called the
democrats piekpockets? w. G. BrownFow, the
Federal orator who spoke on Thursday night
Who called Mr.. Van Burcn " miserable attacEe
to the skirts of Gen. Jackson"4 Mr.. Badger, in
his speech on Saturday night Who saidit would
have been better for the country if Mr. Van Bu-
ren had meuer been born" The same Mfr. Badg-
er. Who said the democrats were neither patri-
offs, nor gentlemen, nor christians2 Old Mr.. Har-
rls, (another Minister of Cody who spoke on Sa-
turday night But, this-this is not abuse hI
comes from all the deeency'-and how can they
utter any thing abusive in its character2


But we have not done with Mr. Stanlv That
Individual charged, in his speech op Thursday
night, that Mr. Van Buren was opposed to the
last war. This Mr.. Staniy knew to be base and
lnmanly calumniation of an infinitely better and
greater man than himself; and we here distinctly
md unequivocally assert that when he made this
charge against Mr. Van Buren, he deliberately
uttered aohat he kneso to be false