1rTrE AHOY!!
{"character_count": 2592, "word_count": 469, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9516000151634216], "ccnet_perplexity": [1424.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
.ne,,cArr ouEsrroN."--We used to

 rsigbbor, of the Gazette, as to hlsvlews

 fal neg Iard to the annexation of Texas

 c,itb desire to know whether he

 inst it; and as it was a most impor-

 Sastiou. we did hope that no conduc-

 ", 41 nress would be afraid to take one side

 oi' r. tbis reasonable hope, however, we

 CT ;.ted Our neighbor avoided the issue,

 P. 7, na delicate question ;;'' and we had to

 ..,t;og D astride Me fence of ''"oncommitGt- sise s.se no doubt he acished to say he was

 ma aov,tion; but he was evidently efaid 1 :. ' afraid either of hurting the populari- k r r,r or of being hurt by the heavy lash

 G'j ;s+iIe Journal So it was, he did not

 y, he was for or againstthe annexation.- 2, a,r peighbor's delicate position; and, in 6ed him.

 neipbbor's feelings-for we would not se,,lings for the world; but from a sense of % florence to public sentiment abroad. In snse paper we find the following;

 Ibserve in the last Arkansas State Ga strong article against onnenot'on 9t

 '% The writer states it would produce Injury to that State"

 's' PMs6urg Ga@ette. well this paragraph! It quotes our neigh |. sate Gazette; and obviously intends, by to indicate that he speaks the sentimental ] on this subject Even admitting that our t tbe Sfqte Gazette-the organ of the late nar excellence, Ga very amusing admis- ,,rsyerl is it, as quoted, fair exponent of EmeDt of Arkansas in regard to annexation } ,yer NO and this answer will be echoed, tenths-ay by nineteen t'oentieths ofthe peo- D,elves. Indeed, we do not believe that , one hundre persons in the State who are

 to annexation. Does not our neighbor, e the propriety of defining his position-ay ,c sides for annexation, if he desires to be red fair exponent of the sentiment of the If not, then he is one of those unfortunates ,ye eyes, yet aoiN not see"

 et fl be known that this 'Pittsburg Gazette" d Abolition paper, and claims opposition to ion as so much in favor of its foul schemes; efore, it is fair to presume that it considers hbpr as an ally of abolition, Again, does not hbor see the propriety of defining his posi- )r is he willing that the abolitionists shall i'm, Will he sort with such company-the arted foes of the South' Will he lend them Il this vital contest Or will he die low 3 dark, ;" until the battle is over, and then, brave boy who hid in the we'll, come forth leatly take sides with the strong?

 lelicate question, with our neighbor, seems ether he most desires the election of Mir ars the Louisville Journal-or loves his

 We wish him a safe deliverance from his ,osition.