Common Pleas.
{"character_count": 907, "word_count": 149, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9564999938011169], "ccnet_perplexity": [1609.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



july chapman VS.. Wiber-This case reported In
yesterdays Herald given to the jury. His Honor IN
charging took occasion TO comment the character OF
the testimony had trial at Batavia and
the minds the jury the necessity Of drawing the proper
distinctions to whether not the criminal
was instituted without probable cause whether the
Plaintiff Chapman had feoniousy appropriated II to his
own The evidence to sustain the action shond also
be unimpeachable and worthy Of credit before jury
should be influenced by t-ior II ialsen particular
II should be considered false in sl One of the witness
es, Butler had his testimony impeached and II remained
for the jury to exercise sound discrimination in dealing
with testimony The chief question for the jury to con
slider was whether he had acted without probable
malice or acquired the possession by trick.


The jury will render aseaied verdict this forenoon