Peer review declaration

All conference organizers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? There are five main criteria: relevance to the conference topic, importance of the research/state-of-the-art, proper methodology, arguments and conclusions, and academic writing quality. All the criteria are included in the substantial review form (attached) provided for the reviewers. Organizers also prepared a technical review form (attached) to assess the compliance with IOP template and guidelines and to inform the result of plagiarism check. There was the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions, up to a maximum of two (2) times based on substantial reviews. • Conference submission management system: using Morressier Submission System, the complete submission guidelines are available in following link https://symposiumjessd.ui.ac.id/guideline/ • Number of submissions received: 193 • Number of submissions sent for review: 162 • Number of submissions accepted: 88 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received × 100): 45,6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1-2 • Review process was done in a maximum of 14 days. • Contact person for queries: Herdis Herdiansyah, School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, e-mail: herdis@ui.ac.id