Next-generation sequencing proves clonal relationship between two distinguished lung and liver carcinomas by standard histopathology approach


 Introduction: Two tumors having different histopathologies at anatomically distinct sites giving the picture of dual primary malignancies. Here we presented a case of two possible primary tumors and one secondary mass.

 Case Report: A 74-year-old female, active smoker, without personal or family cancer history presented with early satiety and weakness for two months. Systems review was positive for a “raw” feeling in stomach, alleviated with antacids. Vital signs were stable with a negative abdominal exam. Lab showed leukocytosis 24.8 K/uL (3.5–10.8 K/uL) with left shift, microcytic anemia with hemoglobin 6.1 g/dL (12.0–16.0 g/dL), and reactive thrombocytosis 477 K/uL (130–400 K/uL). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed right upper lobe necrotizing cavitating lesion with reactive mediastinal and right hilar lymphadenopathy, two irregular hypodense lesions in pancreatic head and tail without ductal dilation with two irregular hypodense liver lesions. Immunohistochemistry of lung and pancreatic lesions were biopsied through endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), consistent with poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with extensive necrosis, which indicates pancreatic masses are likely metastases from the lung. Liver lesion biopsy exhibited high-grade neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with focal necrosis. Next gene sequencing was pursued. Given poor functional status, palliative immunotherapy was offered; however, the patient succumbed to respiratory failure.

 Conclusion: Given the morphology and immunoprofile, differential diagnosis includes dual primary cancers with one metastasis, or primary SCC with metastasis with neuroendocrine differentiation. Despite having different histopathology and immunophenotype, both lung and liver tumors harbor the same molecular profile even at the variants of unknown significance that show identical mutations. As a result, they are directly related. TP53, RB1, MYCL1, and MEK1 mutations are more prevalent in SCC than NET. Tumor mutation burden values may vary as the tumor clonal structure varies between primary and metastatic sites, with higher rates of monoclonal structure recorded in metastases due to clonal selection, leading to a reduction in overall genetic diversity (“bottlenecking”). This raises the suspicion that the liver tumor is a SCC with neuroendocrine differentiation. The paucity of the specimen and rapid clinical course limited further investigation. Germline testing would have been useful to determine whether these findings are somatic or germline.
