Is there an association between 30-day mortality and adrenaline infusion rates in post-ROSC patients? A retrospective observational analysis

Introduction: Revised guidelines for the management of cardiac arrest have placed greater emphasis on early defibrillation and closed chest compressions; subsequently there has been a significant rise in the number of patients gaining a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
 As a consequence, emergency medical services have realised the importance of therapies delivered during this phase of care. In some Trusts this includes the use of inotropic agents to augment the cardiovascular system and maintain adequate cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures to mitigate
 the effects of post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Currently, limited evidence exists with regards to the efficacy of such treatments in the pre-hospital phase.Methods: Retrospective observational analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received an adrenaline infusion
 by critical care paramedics. Infusion rates, time of call (ToC) to ROSC and 30-day mortality were compared.Results: Over a 2-year period, 202 patients were recorded as having an adrenaline infusion commenced. Of these, 25 were excluded as they did not meet criteria or had incomplete
 data and 22 were excluded as the infusion was stopped at scene; 155 patients were admitted to hospital. There were no survivors in the non-shockable group and three survivors in the shockable group at 30 days. A rare events analysis found no relationship between infusion rate, ToC to ROSC
 and 30-day mortality (Wald chi2, 1.37).Conclusion: Commencement of adrenaline infusions in post-ROSC was associated with significant 30-day mortality, especially in non-shockable rhythms. Further research is needed to elucidate whether this intervention has any benefit in the post-ROSC
 patient.