680 SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE IN TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH THE TENDYNE MITRAL VALVE SYSTEM


 
 
 Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the Tendyne System is a therapeutic option for selected patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) not eligible for either surgical intervention or transcatheter repair. To date, only a few studies have evaluated the short-term and mid-term outcomes of these patients in a real-life scenario.
 
 
 
 To describe the baseline features, and the short- and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing TMVR with the Tendyne System at our Center.
 
 
 
 Consecutive patients undergoing TMVR with the Tendyne System at our Center from November 2018 and August 2022 were enrolled. The baseline features of the study cohort were collected during the index hospitalization and patients were followed-up for the endpoints of all-cause death, residual MR, and prothesis dysfunction.
 
 
 
 Twenty-two patients (aged 75±6 years, 36% men) with moderate-to-severe or severe MR undergoing TMVR with the Tendyne System were recruited. Many patients were highly symptomatic (45% New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III or IV) and the etiology of MR was secondary or mixed in 18 (82%) cases. Prostheses were successfully implanted in all patients, with no peri-procedural residual MR (only two patients had a mild paravalvular leak). One patient died of sepsis during the index hospitalization. Out of 19 patients evaluated at a 30-day follow-up, 18 (95%) had no residual MR, 16 (84%) had an improved functional status (of at least one NYHA grade). Mid-term (>6 months) follow-up was available for 15 patients, 4 of whom were dead (2 died of heart failure, one of sepsis, and one of intestinal ischemia). Among the 10 patients undergoing a mid-term follow-up echocardiography, 8 had no residual MR and 2 had only mild MR. Two valve-related adverse events (i.e., endocarditis) were registered during the follow-up.
 
 
 
 TMVR with the Tendyne System appears to be a safe and promising technique for symptomatic patients affected by signficant MR and not suitable for other procedures. Since experience is still limited, more data including a longer follow-up is warranted to optimize patient selection and outcomes.
