Clinical and functional analysis of closed reduction-plastering and volar locking plate methods in distal radius fractures in patients over 60 years of age

Aim: Many different methods have been described in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) in the elderly population, and which one is the better method is a matter of debate among orthopedic surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare the results of closed reduction and plastering (CRP) and volar locking plate (VLP), which are used in the treatment of DRF in the elderly population. 
Materials and Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2020, 36 patients with DRF aged > 60 years were evaluated retrospectively. There were 19 patients in the CRP group and 17 patients in the VLP group. Wrist flexion, extension, pronation, supination, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation degrees and grip strength were measured in the first year of their treatment. The patients were evaluated functionally by patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), modified Green and O'Brien score (MGOS), and resting and stress visual analogue scale (VAS). 
Results: In both groups, similar ROM values were obtained and no significant difference was observed. While the PRWE score was 17.5 ± 5.5 in the CRP group and 12.5 ± 4.8 in the VLP group, the MGOS score was 83.0 ± 7.4 in the CRP group and 86.8 ± 12.6 in the VLP group, and the scores were not significantly different (p = 0.802, p = 0.315). While there was almost no pain in both groups at rest, more pain was felt in the VKP group under stress. While grip strength was 20.9 ± 6.4 kg in the CRP group, it was 22.2 ± 6.8 kg in the VLP group, and there was no significant difference compared to the contralateral wrist. 
Conclusion: There is no clinical and functional difference between CRP and VLP in the one-year period after DRF treatment in the patient population aged > 60 years. Treatment should be planned according to the functional capacity of the patient.