Pyroptosis relates to tumor microenvironment remodeling and prognosis: A pan-cancer perspective

Background and aim Pyroptosis is an inflammatory form of programmed cell death implicated in inflammation and disease. Moreover, inducing pyroptosis has been appreciated as anti-cancer therapy for its ability to unleash anti-cancer immune responses. Methods Utilizing the data available in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), pyroptosis-related genes’ (PRGs) expression, genomic aberrations, and clinical significance were systematically analyzed in pan-cancer. A GSVA score was obtained to rate pyroptosis level and divide the cancers into pyroptosis-low and pyroptosis-high groups. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to evaluate the differential expression of major PRGs (GSDMC, GSDMD, GSDME, NLRP3, NLRC4, IL1B) in selected tumor types (COAD, HNSC, KIRC, LIHC, LUAD, LUSC). Selection of tumors for immunohistochemistry (IHC) was based on their expression pattern in TCGA cancers, clinical relevance, tumor epidemiology, and sample availability. Results Differential expression of PRGs was evident in various cancers and associated with prognosis which was driven by genomic variations and epigenetic abnormalities, such as single nucleotide variations (SNVs), copy number variation (CNV) and DNA methylation level. For example, methylation of PRGs in lower grade glioma (LGG), uveal melanoma (UVM) and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) were predictive of improved survival as upregulation of PRGs was risky in these cancers. Pyroptosis level significantly differentiated tumor from normal samples in 15 types of cancers, exhibited a progressive trend with cancer stage, observed variation among cancer subtypes, and showed a significant association with cancer prognosis. Higher pyroptosis level was associated with worst prognosis in majority of the cancers in terms of OS (KIRC, LGG, and UVM), PFS (GBM, KIRC, LGG, PRAD, THCA, and THYM) and DSS (KIRC and LGG) as estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Moreover, Pyroptosis level was strongly indicative of a hot tumor immune microenvironment with high presence of CD8+ T cell and other T cell subtypes. Several oncogenic pathways, such as P53 pathway, DNA repair, KRAS signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), IL6 JAK STAT3 signaling, IL2 STAT5 signaling, PI3K AKT MTOR signaling and angiogenesis, were enriched in pyroptosis-hi subgroups across cancers. Conclusions Genetic alterations in PRGs greatly influence the pyroptosis level and cancer prognosis. A relatively hot tumor immune microenvironment was associated with pyroptosis irrespective of the cancer prognosis. Overall, our study reveals the critical role of pyroptosis in cancer and highlights pyroptosis-based therapeutic vulnerabilities.