Calorimeter measurements of absolute dose in aluminum, a surrogate of bone, to validate dose-to-medium in Acuros XB

Objective. While the accuracy of dose calculations in water with Acuros XB is well established, experimental validation of dose in bone is limited. Acuros XB reports both dose-to-medium and dose-to-water, and these values differ in bone, but there are no reports of measurements of validation in bone. This work compares Acuros XB calculations to measurements of absolute dose in aluminum (medium similar to bone). The validity of using selected relative dosimeters in aluminum is also investigated. Approach. A calorimeter with an aluminum core embedded in an aluminum phantom was selected as bone surrogate for the measurement of absolute dose. Matching the medium of the core to the medium of the phantom allowed eliminating the calculation of the conversion between media. The dose was measured at the fixed depth of 3.3 cm in aluminum (∼9 g·cm−2) with 6X, 10X, 6FFF and 10FFF photon beams from a TrueBeam Varian linac. In addition, experimental cross-calibration between water and aluminum was performed for an IBA CC13 ionization chamber, a PTW microDiamond and EBT3 Gafchromic film. Main results. Calculations with Acuros XB dose-to-medium in aluminum differed from the calorimetry data by −2.8% to −3.5%, depending on the beam. Use of dose-to-water would have resulted in about 39% discrepancy. The cross calibration coefficient between water and aluminum yielded values of about 0.87 for the CC13 chamber, 0.91 for the microDiamond, and 0.88 for the film, and independent of the beam within about ±1%. Significance. It was demonstrated the value of the dose-to-medium in aluminum (surrogate of bone) computed with Acuros XB is close to the value of the absolute dose measured with a calorimeter, and there is a significant discrepancy when dose-to-water is used instead. The use of an ionization chamber, a microDiamond and Gafchromic film in aluminum required a considerable correction from calibration in water.