Modeling the Missing DBHs: Influence of Model Form on UAV DBH Characterization

The reliability of forest management decisions partly depends on the quality and extent of the data needed for the decision. However, the relatively high cost of traditional field sampling limits sampling intensity and data quality. One strategy to increase data quality and extent, while reducing the overall sample effort, is using remote sensing-based data from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). While these techniques reliably identify most tree locations and heights in open-canopied forests, their ability to characterize diameter at breast height (DBH) is limited to estimates of a fraction of trees within the area. This study used UAV-derived DBHs and explanatory variables to test five model forms in predicting the missing DBHs. The results showed that filtering UAV DBHs using regionally derived height to DBH allometries significantly improved model performance. The best predicting model was slightly biased, with a 5.6 cm mean error and a mean absolute error of 6.8 cm. When applied across the stand, the number of trees was underestimated by 26.7 (3.9%), while the basal area and quadratic mean diameter were overestimated by 3.3 m2 ha−1 (13.1%) and 1.8 cm (8.3%), respectively. This study proposes a pathway for remotely sensed DBHs to predict missing DBHs; however, challenges are highlighted in ensuring the model training dataset represents the population.