Genomic heterogeneity and ploidy identify patients with intrinsic resistance to PD-1 blockade in metastatic melanoma

While the introduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has dramatically improved clinical outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma, a significant proportion of patients develop resistance to therapy, and mechanisms of resistance are poorly elucidated in most cases. Further, while combination ICB has higher response rates and improved progression free survival compared to single agent therapy in the front line setting, there is significantly increased toxicity with combination ICB, and biomarkers to identify patients who would disproportionately benefit from combination therapy vs aPD-1 ICB are poorly characterized. To understand resistance mechanisms to single vs combination ICB therapy, we analyze whole-exome-sequencing (WES) of pre-treatment tumor and matched normals of 4 cohorts (n=140) of previously ICB-naïve aPD-1 ICB treated patients. We find that high intratumoral genomic heterogeneity and low ploidy identify patients with intrinsic resistance to aPD-1 ICB. Comparing to a melanoma cohort from a pre-targeted therapy and ICB time period (“untreated” cohort), we find that genomic heterogeneity specifically predicts response and survival in the ICB treated cohorts, but not in the untreated cohort, while ploidy is also prognostic of overall survival in the “untreated” (by targeted therapy or ICB) group. To establish clinically actionable predictions, we optimize a simple decision tree using genomic ploidy and heterogeneity to identify with high confidence (90% PPV) a subset of patients with intrinsic resistance to and significantly worse survival on aPD1 ICB treatment. We then validate this model in independent cohorts, and further show that a significant proportion of patients predicted to have intrinsic resistance to single agent aPD-1 ICB respond to combination ICB, which suggests that nominated patients may benefit disproportionately from combination ICB. We further show that the features and predictions of the model are independent of known clinical features and previously nominated molecular biomarkers. These findings highlight the clinical and biological importance of genomic heterogeneity and ploidy, and sets a concrete framework towards clinical actionability, broadly advancing precision medicine in oncology.