Comparison of two methods for assessment of the rod positioning uncertainty and consequences on the evaluation of correlation factors

In this paper two major families of methods to deal with the assessment of the rod positioning uncertainty in a lattice are tested: a traditional one described in the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (IHECSBE) Handbook and the other one consisting in sampling the position of rods with Monte Carlo techniques (ISO Uncertainty Guidelines). They are applied on a benchmark with tight-packed lattice of UO 2 rods that is sensitive to the rod positioning as it is clearly under-moderated. It is shown that the choice of the method has a great impact on the propagated uncertainty, the traditional one leading to a significant overestimation of the overall uncertainty and can also contribute to a bias in the correlation factors that are used for assessing biases due to nuclear data using GLLSM methodologies. The paper briefly describes the tight-packed lattice experimental program performed at the Valduc Research Centre, which is at the origin of these concerns. Then it proposes a simple model on which to apply simulations of rod positioning to be performed with MORET 5 Monte Carlo code using the Prométhée tool. Results demonstrate that use of Monte Carlo methodologies provide more realistic uncertainty estimates in fuel pitch that are consistent with repeatability/reproducibility experiments. The current comparisons use light water reactor systems, which is directly relevant to some small modular reactor designs. However, accurate prediction and estimate of uncertainties in pitch for advanced reactor systems is also relevant. The application of unrealistic uncertainty analysis methods can incur larger margins in advanced reactor design, safety, and operation than are necessary.