An Assessment of the National Water Model’s Ability to Reproduce Drought Series in the Northeastern United States


Portions of the northeastern United States (NE) have experienced drought every year since 2016. The U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) has played an important role in drought characterization and management by providing weekly drought maps across the entire United States, including the NE. Unfortunately, the USDM lacks consistency between input variables leading to difficulties in defining boundaries between drought categories. This paper evaluates the National Water Model’s (NWM) ability to model streamflow and soil moisture, two important hydrological products that are frequently incorporated in drought indices. Using a 26-yr NWM retrospective simulation, comparisons were conducted between NWM output and observations of streamflow and soil moisture, as well as between drought categories derived from the NWM and observations and the USDM. Results indicate that NWM provides moderate predictions of streamflow at NE stations when comparing to historical observations, that NWM streamflow estimators are generally upwardly biased, and performance is worse at lower streamflow magnitudes. The NWM’s ability to predict soil moisture is worse than streamflow, with again a positive bias at most sites and strong variations in anomaly correlation across sites. When predicting drought categories, NWM streamflow is as strong a predictor of USDM drought categories as observed streamflow. Extending the NWM streamflow series using a maintenance of variance technique and only past records provides slight improvements over drought categories derived from the entire 26-yr retrospective simulation. Output from the NWM appears to have some skill in characterizing drought in the NE and provides a spatial resolution to improve the designation of drought boundaries.