Practicing health equity in involuntary discharges to overcome disparities in dialysis and kidney patient care

Purpose of review Potential causes and consequences of involuntary discharge (IVD) of patients from dialysis facilities are widely unknown. So, also are the extent of racial disparities in IVDs and their impact on health equity. Recent findings Under the current End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program Conditions for Coverage (CFC), there are limited justifications for IVDs. The ESRD Networks oversee dialysis quality and safety including IVDs in US dialysis facilities, with support from the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ) and other stakeholders. Whereas black Americans constitute a third of US dialysis patients, they are even more overrepresented in the planned and executed IVDs. Cultural gaps between patients and dialysis staff, psychosocial and regional factors, structural racism in kidney care, antiquated ESRD policies, unintended consequences of quality incentive programs, other perverse incentives, and failed patient–provider communications are among potential contributors to IVDs. Summary Practicing health equity in kidney care may be negatively impacted by IVDs. Accurate analyses of patterns and trends of involuntary discharges, along with insights from well designed AHRQ surveys and qualitative research with mixed method approaches are urgently needed. Pilot and feasibility programs should be designed and tested, to address the root causes of IVDs and related racial disparities.