Non-transformative climate policy options decrease conservative support for renewable energy in the U.S.


 Motivated by ongoing partisan division in support of climate change policy, this paper investigates whether, among self-identifying liberals and conservatives, the mere presence of a non-transformative climate policy such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), lowers support for a renewable energy (RE) policy. To interrogate this question, we use a survey experiment asking 2,374 respondents about their support for a renewable energy policy when presented with the renewable energy policy alone, and when presented alongside a CCS policy whose funding and implementation leverage independent funding sources. We find that among conservatives, the presence of a CCS policy lowers support for renewable energy. Furthermore, despite the lack of apparent political party cues, when presented with the policy-pair, conservatives tend to view the renewable energy policy in more partisan terms, specifically, less supported by Republicans. Additional experimental conditions with explicit party cues reinforce this interpretation. These findings suggest that the triggering of partisan perceptions even without explicit partisan cues-- what we call political anchoring --might be a key impediment to bipartisan support of climate solutions in the U.S. context.