281 CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION TERHAPY IN PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA WITH A BRIDGING INNOMINATE VEIN


 
 
 The Persistent Left (PL) Superior Vena Cava (SVC) is a congenital malformation of the thoracic venous return that has an incidence of 0.2-3% in the general population and an incidence of about 0.5% in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device. In this case, the placement of the leads, especially for the Right Ventricle (RV) and Left Ventricle (LV) through one of the branches could be challenging.
 
 
 
 A 66-year-old man with hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia, in optimal pharmacologic therapy for congestive heart failure (NYHA II), hospitalized for recurrent syncopal episodes, with extreme sinus bradycardia, first-degree AV block and Left Bundle Branch Block, The patient had a LV hypertrophy and mild global systolic function (LV ejection fraction of 40%) for these we opted for a pacemaker CRT device implantation.
 
 
 
 Isolation of left cephalic vein was used as venous access for right atrium (RA) and RV leads while Seldinger technique via subclavian vein was used as venous access for LV lead. The guidewire through the subclavian vein pointed out the presence of PLSVC. Left subclavian venogram confirmed PLSVC and revealed a bridging innominate vein. To pass through the innominate vein and reach the SVC, a 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire was used. A 6Fr-sheath was advanced through the hydrophilic guidewire, subsequently a second metallic guidewire was advanced through the same introducer by removing the dilator. The RV and RA leads were placed respectively on low right interventricular septum and RA appendage passing through bridging innominate vein. Electrical parameters were normal. For the placement of the LV lead a 9.5Fr sheath introducer was advanced over the guidewire through the PLSVC. A venogram showed a lateral and a postero-lateral branch of the coronary sinus with acute angulation. With a 6Fr quadripolar Josephson catheter the postero-lateral branch was entered, eventually a 9Fr peelable outer guide catheter was advanced through the electrophysiology catheter becoming selective with the interested branch. A quadripolar S shaped lead was used, it was advanced into the targeted vein through a 0,014fr hydrophilic guidewire. Adequate electrical parameters and stability were achieved.
 
 
 
 Lead implantation in patient with PLSVC is challenging. Placing the RA and RV leads through SVC ensure a better stability along time. The cannulation of CS is easily achieved by approach via PLSVC while selective vein cannulation can be difficult due to the modified acute angulation.
