356 DAPAGLIFLOZIN USE IN HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION PATIENTS: A SINGLE CENTRE COMPARISON BETWEEN REAL-LIFE AND DAPA-HF DATA


 
 
 Practice guidelines recommend Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to describe our population of patients with indications for Dapagliflozin, to compare it with the DAPA-HF trial population and assess the possible prognostic evolution.
 
 
 
 We retrospectively analysed clinical data of the first 100 HFrEF patients treated with Dapagliflozin at our heart failure clinic (Centro Cardiologico Monzino) from September 2021.
 
 
 
 Table 1 shows patient characteristics in our study (n = 100) and in the DAPA-HF trial (n = 2373). Our patients had a mean age of 69±11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 31,1±8,0%, New York Heart Association class II (78%), class III (21%) and class IV (1%). 64% of our patients performed cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), with mean peak VO2/kg of 14,3±4,5 ml/min/kg and mean VE/VCO2 slope of 39,1±10,5. In our study, compared to the DAPA-HF trial population, there were fewer diabetic patients (14,1% vs 41,8%, p < 0,001), a larger number of patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (59,6% vs 26,2%, p < 0,001) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (22,2% vs 8,0%, p < 0,001). Furthermore, our population had a higher percentage of patients already on optimised therapy with Sacubitril/Valsartan (86,9% vs 10,5%, p < 0,001) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (82,8% vs 71,5%, p < 0,001), along with beta-blockers (97,9% vs 96%, p = 0,434).
 
 
 
 Our patients were slightly older and frailer than those in the pivotal DAPA-HF trial and probably at a more advanced stage of the disease as suggested by the higher prevalence of ICD/CRT and Sacubitril/Valsartan. Based on these results, it may be that the expected prognostic benefit of adding Dapagliflozin to their therapy, in terms of absolute risk, will be lower than in the DAPA-HF trial. Future studies and a longer follow-up are needed to compare death and hospitalisation rates.
