Testing Evolutionary Conflict Theories for Sexual and Physical Intimate Partner Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa


 Intimate partner violence (IPV) refers to physical, sexual and psychological violence. Here an evolutionary approach is used to compare risk factors for male-to-female IPV perpetration, analysing physical and sexual IPV separately. Two hypotheses based on sexual conflict theory have been applied to IPV perpetration, but they remain largely untested using empirical data; 1) men perpetrate IPV in response to a perceived threat to their paternity certainty; 2) IPV is caused by men pursuing a higher fertility optima than their partners, either within marriage (reproductive coercion) or outside marriage (paternal disinvestment). DHS data from couples in 12 sub-Saharan African countries (n 25,577) are used to test these evolutionary hypotheses, using multilevel models and controlling for potential social and environmental confounds.
 The results show that evolutionary theory provides important insight into different risk factors by IPV type. Indicators of paternity concern are associated with an increased risk of both physical and sexual IPV, indicators of paternal disinvestment are associated with an increased risk of physical IPV only, while reproductive coercion is not associated with either IPV type. The risk factors identified here correspond with proximate level explanations for IPV perpetration, but an evolutionary interpretation explains why these particular factors may motivate IPV in certain contexts.