Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.

BACKGROUND
T4 rectal cancer is a challenging condition owing to the highly invasive nature of the tumour that may compromise R0 resection. The present study aimed to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of non-metastatic T4 rectal adenocarcinoma.


METHODS
This was a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis using the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2019. Patients with pathological T4 non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted resection were compared and a propensity score-matched analysis was performed in a 1:1 manner. The main outcome measures were conversion to open surgery, mortality, readmission, resection margins, and overall survival.


RESULTS
After propensity score matching, 235 patients were included in each group. There were 260 (55.3 per cent) men and 210 (44.7 per cent) women, with a mean (s.d.) age of 61 (13.2) years. Patients in the robotic group had a statistically significantly lower conversion rate (8.9 per cent versus 17.9 per cent; P = 0.006), shorter median duration of hospital stay (5 versus 6 days; P = 0.007), higher overall survival rate (56.2 per cent versus 43.4 per cent; P = 0.007), and a longer median survival (60.8 versus 43.2; P = 0.025). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to positive resection margins, examined lymph nodes, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates, and 30-day readmission rate.


CONCLUSIONS
Robotic resections of T4 rectal cancer were associated with a significantly lower conversion rate and shorter duration of hospital stay than laparoscopic resections. The two approaches were comparable with regard to positive resection margins, short-term mortality, and readmission.