Teaching rotary root canal instrumentation using a Peyton teaching approach.

AIM
To evaluate the effectiveness of a Peyton teaching approach for rotary root canal instrumentation, in comparison to the traditional "see one - do one" method.


METHODOLOGY
40 undergraduate students were randomly divided into two groups (n=20). Students of the first group (G1) were taught how to use rotary instrumentation using a modified Peyton method, while the second group (G2) watched a teaching video (30 min) on the same subject. Both groups instrumented a plastic block and subsequently both mesial canals of an extracted lower molar. The quality of the root canal instrumentation was analyzed by 2 blinded observers on video recordings and x-rays.


RESULTS
Interobserver correlation was 0.917 (p< 0.0005; Pearson) for the assessment of the video recordings; students of G1 received significantly more total points (83.55 ± 6.82 points) compared to G2 (69.76 ± 13.82) (p=0.001; t-test), the gender had no significant effect on the overall results (p=0.444; two-way ANOVA). Significant differences were detected for the categories "initial scouting", "coronal enlargement", "glide path preparation", "preparation using X2 file", "preparation using X3 file" (p< 0.05; t-test) as well as for the subcategories "sequence of rinse, recapitulation, rinse" (p= 0.001; t-test) and "recapitulation" (p< 0.002; t-test). No differences between groups were observed for the radiographic evaluation with respect to working length and canal straightening.


CONCLUSION
Teaching rotary instrumentation by using the Peyton approach resulted in improved performance of undergraduate students assessed with a checklist-based process analysis. Enhanced implementation of rotary instrumentation could result in better long-term results of students' root canal treatment.