2017 Maine Question 1
# 2017 Maine Question 1

Elections in Maine :

Federal offices

U.S. President

1820

1824

1828

1832

1836

1840

1844

1848

1852

1856

1860

1864

1868

1872

1876

1880

1884

1888

1892

1896

1900

1904

1908

1912

1916

1920

1924

1928

1932

1936

1940

1944

1948

1952

1956

1960

1964

1968

1972

1976

1980

1984

1988

1992

1996

2000

2004

Dem

2008

Dem

Rep

2012

Rep

2016

Dem

Rep

2020

Dem

Rep

2024

Dem

Rep

U.S. Senate

1820

1821

1823

1823

1827

1829 sp

1835

1835 sp

1837 sp

1839

1840

1843 sp

1846

1848 sp

1851

1854 sp

1857

1857 sp

1859

1861 sp

1863

1865 sp

1869

1870 sp

1875

1877

1877 sp

1880

1881

1881 sp

1883

1887

1889

1893

1895

1899

1901

1905

1907

1911

1912 sp

1913

1916

1916 sp

1918

1922

1924

1926 sp

1928

1930

1934

1936

1940

1942

1946

1948

1952

1954

1958

1960

1964

1966

1970

1972

1976

1978

1982

1984

1988

1990

1994

1996

2000

2002

2006

2008

2012

2014

2018

2020

2024

U.S. House of Representatives

1820–1821

1822 sp 2nd

1823

1824–1825

1826–1827

1826 sp 5th

1827 sp 1st

1828–1830

1830

1833

1834

1836

1838

1840

1843

1844

1846

1848

1850

1852

1854

1856

1858

1860

1860 sp 5th

1862

1864

1866

1868

1870

1872

1874

1876

1878

1880

1881 sp 2nd

1882

1884

1886

1888

1890

1892

1894

1896

1897 sp 3rd

1898

1899 sp 1st

1899 sp 2nd

1900

1901 sp 4th

1902

1904

1906

1908

1908 sp 2nd

1908 sp 4th

1910

1912

1913 sp 3rd

1914

1916

1918

1920

1922

1924

1926

1928

1930

1932

1934

1936

1938

1940

1940 sp 2nd

1942

1944

1946

1948

1950

1951 sp 3rd

1952

1954

1956

1958

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024 :

State government

Gubernatorial elections

1820

1821

1822

1823

1824

1825

1826

1827

1828

1829

1830

1831

1832

1833

1834

1835

1836

1837

1838

1848

1876

1877

1878

1879

1880

1882

1884

1886

1888

1890

1892

1894

1896

1898

1900

1902

1904

1906

1908

1910

1912

1914

1916

1918

1920

1922

1924

1926

1928

1930

1932

1934

1936

1938

1940

1942

1944

1946

1948

1950

1952

1954

1956

1958

1960

1962

1966

1970

1974

1978

1982

1986

1990

1994

1998

2002

2006

2010

2014

2018

2022

State Senate elections

2016

2018

2020

2022

State House elections

2016

2018

2020

2022 :

Ballot measures

People's vetoes

2009Question 1

2011Question 1

2018Question 1 (Jun)

2020Question 1

Citizen initiated referendums

2012Question 1

2014Question 1

2015Question 1

2016

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

2017

Question 1

Question 2

2018

Question 1 (Nov)

2021

Question 1

Constitutional amendments

2021

Question 3 :

City of Portland

Mayoral elections

2011

2015

2019

2023 :

vte :

Maine Question 1, formally An Act To Allow Slot Machines or a Casino in York County, was a citizen-initiated referendum question that appeared on the November 7, 2017, statewide ballot in Maine. It sought to award a license for the construction and operation of a casino in York County, Maine by a qualified entity as spelled out in the proposed law, with tax revenue generated by the casino to go to specific programs. The wording of the proposed law effectively permitted only one company, Capital 7, to be awarded the license. The ballot measure was defeated, with 83% of voters opposing it.

The effort to put the question on the ballot generated controversy due to how the petition drive and campaign for the casino were funded and conducted, as well as the fact that the casino would have effectively not been given out by a competitive process. The campaign committees supporting the question had record fines levied against them from authorities related to violations of Maine campaign finance law.

## Background

An initial effort to place a referendum for a York County casino on the ballot for November 2016 failed after Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap announced on March 2, 2016 that only 36,000 of the 91,000 signatures turned in were valid, when roughly 61,000 were required. 36,000 signatures were rejected because the signature of the petition circulators on the petitions did not match the signature on file. 19,000 more were invalidated because they did not belong to registered voters. Horseracing Jobs Fairness, the group supporting the proposal, sued Dunlap to get the signatures reinstated, but the suit was rejected.

The signature gathering effort was criticized by several state and local officials for alleged misleading claims by signature gatherers, such as one in Bangor telling potential signers that it would "help uplift the spirits of the people of Bangor" when York County is over 120 miles from Bangor. Dunlap's office received several complaints about false claims by petition gatherers, but said there was nothing they could do as false claims are constitutionally protected free speech, and that it was the responsibility of the signer to ask about the proposal.

Those collecting signatures in the 2016 effort were offered $10 a signature, compared to a 2014 effort to ban bear baiting while hunting, which offered $2 a signature.

Horseracing Jobs Fairness then resumed gathering signatures and submitted 65,000 more in December 2016, with Dunlap validating 53,000 of them on January 23, 2017, which when combined with previously validated signatures was enough to place the question on the November 2017 ballot.

Dunlap announced the final wording of the question that will appear on the ballot on September 7, 2017. It will read, "Do you want to allow a certain company to operate table games and/or slot machines in York County, subject to state and local approval, with part of the profits going to the specific programs described in the initiative?".

The proposal was criticized for limiting applicants for the license to "an entity that owned in 2003 at least 51 percent of an entity licensed to operate a commercial track in Penobscot County". The only entity that meets that criterion is Capital 7, which is largely owned by developer Shawn Scott. Though the company must be given the license, it can be sold after it is obtained. Shawn Scott did this in 2003 after convincing Maine voters to authorize the opening of the Hollywood Casino Bangor, selling it to Penn National Gaming.

Until April 2017, Shawn's sister Lisa Scott appeared as the sole funder of the campaign. After the Maine Ethics Commission began an investigation of the campaign, Lisa revealed that most of the money comes from both domestic and offshore investment firms connected to Shawn. The investigation revealed that $4 million was spent just to get the question on the ballot. Lisa stepped down from the campaign at the end of August 2017, stating that she did not want to be a distraction from the campaign.

### Ethics commission fines

On November 3, 2017, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices voted in a series of 4-1 votes to levy fines totaling $500,000 against the four ballot question committees involved in the campaign for Question 1. The fines were related to violations of Maine's campaign finance disclosure laws from those committees and Lisa Scott, being what the commission called a pattern of evasion in disclosing who was funding the campaign. One commissioner said that there seemed to have been an effort to conceal the involvement of Shawn Scott in the funding of the campaign. The amount of the fines was a record for the commission, being almost 10 times that of the previous record, though it was not the maximum permitted by law. Members of the commission who voted for the high fines said that believed a law passed by voters in 2015 required the steeper fines, and they wished to send a message that the public has a right to know where money for campaigns comes from. The one commissioner who voted against the fines, Bradford Pattenshall, stated that the felt the high fines were "grossly disproportionate" to the offenses and did not see the violations as nefarious. Lawyers representing Lisa Scott and the campaign committees have said the fines were excessive and that the Commission had "put its thumb on the scale" for the upcoming vote. They pledged to appeal the fines in court.

The Commission also voted 5-0 that a campaign committee led by Shawn Scott was only a donor to the other committees, and as such did not need to register as a political action committee. A spokesperson for Shawn, former Maine Attorney General Andrew Ketterer, said that Shawn had been "vindicated" and that the ruling was proof he had complied with the spirit and letter of the law.

## Campaign

By September 15, 2017, no formal opposition to the proposal had emerged, and no television advertising had been purchased in Maine's media markets regarding the question. Supporters released a TV ad on September 27. Opponents, organizing under the name A Bad Deal for Maine PAC, launched a website the week of October 7. Supporters have spent $1.55 million on their campaign, as well as incurring $1 million in debt, according to their October 5 campaign finance report. The only contribution listed on the October 5th finance report of opponents was $30,000 on a poll funded by Churchill Downs Incorporated, which owns the Oxford Casino in Oxford County.

Shawn Scott began to take a higher profile as the election approached, appearing in advertisements, holding news conferences, and representing the campaign at debates.

### Endorsements

**Supporters**

* Andrew Ketterer, former Maine Attorney General
* Aroostook Band of Micmac
* Lance Harvell, State representative (R-Farmington)
* Tom Saviello, State senator (R-Wilton)

**Opponents**

* Paul LePage, Governor of Maine
* Bangor Daily News
* MaineToday Media newspapers; Portland Press Herald, Kennebec Journal, Morning Sentinel

## Result

The Associated Press called the referendum at about 9 P.M. on election night for the no side. With 70 percent of precincts reporting, the no side had about 84% of the vote.

