COMMON POSITION (EC) No 16/1999 adopted by the Council on 8 February 1999 with a view to the adoption of Directive 1999/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC as regards the labelling of certain dangerous substances in Austria and Sweden
C 58/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 1. 3. 1999 COMMON POSITION (EC) No 16/1999 adopted by the Council on 8 February 1999 with a view to the adoption of Directive 1999/…/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC as regards the labelling of certain dangerous substances in Austria and Sweden (1999/C 58/03) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 100a thereof, Having regard Commission (1), to the proposal from the Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3), of Council Directive 30 (1) Whereas Article 1967 27 the June on 67/548/EEC of regulations and the laws, approximation of the to administrative classification, of dangerous substances (4), provides that Member States may not prohibit, restrict or impede the substances which placing on the market of comply with that Directive; provisions packaging labelling relating and requires (2) Whereas Article 23(2)(c) of Directive 67/548/ every package of a EEC thereof substance to show danger symbols, as laid down in Annex II, whereas Article 23(2)(e) of the said Directive requires every package of a substance (safety-phrases) to relating to the safe use of the substance, and whereas the wording of those S-phrases is laid down in Annex IV to that Directive; show specific S-phrases (3) Whereas Article 69 of the 1994 Act of Accession and Annex VIII thereto provide that Article 30 in conjunction with Article 23(2) of Directive 67/548/EEC is not to apply to Austria before 1 January 1999, in that Austria may require the use of symbols not included in Annex II and labels with additional S-phrases not listed in Annex IV to the said Directive regarding counter-measures in case of accident, and that those provisions are to be reviewed in accordance with EC procedures before 31 December 1998; labels with additional (4) Whereas of Article 23(2)(d) every to show specific R-phrases Directive a of 67/548/EEC requires substance (risk phrases) indicating the special risks arising from the dangers involved in using the substance, and whereas the wording of those R-phrases is laid down in Annex III to the said Directive; package (5) Whereas Article 112 of the 1994 Treaty of Accession and Annex XII thereto provide that Article 30 in conjunction with Article 23(2)(d) of Directive 67/548/EEC is not to apply to Sweden before 1 January 1999, in that Sweden may require the use of the additional R-phrases R-322’ and R-340’ not listed in Annex III to the said Directive, and that those provisions are to accordance with EC procedures before 31 December 1998; reviewed be in (1) OJ C 374, 3. 12. 1998, p. 15. (2) OJ C 40, 15. 2. 1999, p. 43. (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 16 December 1998 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Council common position of 8 February 1999 and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (4) OJ 196, 16. 8. 1967, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 98/98/EC (OJ L 355, 30. 12. 1998, p. 1). (6) Whereas Directive 1999/…/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the approximation of regulations and the laws, administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations (5) provides for certain specific conditions for the application of the Directive as regards, inter alia, additional (5) OJ L … 1. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 58/27 symbols, R-phrases and S-phrases for Austria and Sweden in order to take account of the level of their standards for the protection of health and the protection of the environment; whereas those specific conditions are limited to the two-year period running from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2000; whereas during that period coherence of conditions of the marketing dangerous substances and preparations should be sought; (7) Whereas the within framework scientific and technical progress is foreseeable of international negotiations on the harmonisation of the classification of dangerous substances with regard to R-322’, and whereas, in the light of the ongoing international negotiations on the labelling of dangerous substances and taking account of the labelling survey launched by the Commission, Member State experts have agreed to consider the in-depth revision of existing Community legislation with regard to R-340’ an important priority; the outcome of (8) Whereas Community legislation will have to be reviewed in the light of the negotiations on the international harmonisation of the classification and labelling of dangerous substances, and whereas it can be expected that lead to an approximation the outcome will of the standards Community; throughout in this respect the harmonisation procedures toxicology data for all (9) Whereas the Resolution of the Council and of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, of 3 December 1990 on improving the prevention and treatment of acute human poisoning (1) calls for for of collecting clinical the poison centres in the Community in order to facilitate the development of a policy for toxic risk prevention; whereas to that end, the relevant competent authorities, in cooperation with the Commission, are to set up between the poison centres or, where appropriate, other competent services a Community system of information and collaboration concerning the availability of antidotes; (10) Whereas a symbol showing that residues of certain dangerous substances should be collected separately from other waste could reduce the potential release of dangerous substances to the environment by improving the use of special waste collection systems by the general public; whereas, owing to the lack of certain evidence, a certain amount of time is still required for considering the need for such a symbol within the Community; (1) OJ C 329, 31. 12. 1990, p. 6. (11) Whereas the review of Community legislation on dangerous the substances with provisions of the 1994 Act of Accession relating to Austria and Sweden could not be completed by 31 December 1998; regard to procedures within (12) Whereas the provisions covered by this Directive should continue to be reviewed in accordance with Community the exemption period laid down; whereas, however, without prejudice to the outcome of that review, acquis at and communautaire will Sweden under the same conditions as it applies in the other Member States; to Austria period apply that end the the of (13) Whereas Community legislation can provide for derogations for limited periods for certain Member States in the light of their specific situations, HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 The following paragraphs shall be added to Article 23 of Directive 67/548/EEC. Austria may from 1 January 1999 until 5. 31 December 2000 require the use of: — the additional symbol “dustbin with a cross through it” concerning waste disposal, not included in Annex II, and — the S-phrase additional exists, Information medical Centre. ” regarding counter-measures in the case of accident, not listed in Annex IV. contact Poisons “Antidote staff Sweden may from 1 January 1999 until 6. 31 December 2000 require the use of the following additional R-phrases, not listed in Annex III: — “R-322” for substances which present acute toxic covered by criteria for classification of Annex VI (Swedish category “moderately harmful”), and effects not C 58/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 1. 3. 1999 — “R-340” for carcinogenic, category 3, R40. ’ substances classified as instead of R-phrase on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such a reference shall be laid down by the Member States. Article 2 Article 3 The Republic of Austria and the Kingdom of Sweden shall adopt and publish the provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by … (*) at the latest. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at … these When the Member States concerned adopt provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President (*) Twelve months from the publication of the Directive in the Official Journal. EN 1. 3. 1999 Official Journal of the European Communities C 58/29 STATEMENT OF REASONS I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 30 October 1998 the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a Directive (1) based on Article 100a of the EC Treaty, amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC as regards the labelling of certain dangerous substances in Austria and Sweden. 2. The European Parliament delivered its opinion on the Commisson proposal (2) on 16 December 1998, approving it without amendment. 3. The Economic and Social Committee delivered its opinion on 2 December 1998 (3). 4. On 8 February 1999 the Council adopted its common position in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty. II. OBJECTIVE 5. With the aim of ensuring consistency with the Council common position on dangerous preparations (4), this proposal provides for two additional years in the transitional period for certain specific labelling requirements laid down in the Treaty of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden. The transitional period concerns Austria and Sweden only. III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION 6. The Council approved the substance of the Commission proposal. However, it slightly amended the provisions of Article 2. Whereas Austria and Sweden will adopt the provisions’ necessary to comply with this Directive, the other Member States will adopt the necessary procedures’. (1) OJ C 374, 3. 12. 1998, p. 15. (2) Not yet published in the Official Journal. (3) OJ C 40, 15. 2. 1999, p. 43. (4) OJ C 360, 23. 11. 1998, p. 1