COMMON POSITION (EC) No 66/98 adopted by the Council on 16 November 1998 with a view to adopting Council Regulation (EC) No .../98 of ... on the registration and operation within the Community of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which have been modified and recertificated as meeting the standards of Volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, third edition (July 1993)
23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/1 I (Information) COUNCIL COMMON POSITION (EC) No 66/98 adopted by the Council on 16 November 1998 with a view to adopting Council Regulation (EC) No. /98 of. on the registration and operation within the Community of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which have been modified and recertificated as meeting the standards of Volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, third edition (July 1993) (98/C 404/01) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, which contribute to the achievement of sustainable mobility; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 84(2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 189c of the Treaty (3), (1) Whereas one of the key objectives of the common transport policy is sustainable mobility; whereas such a policy can be defined as a global approach the effective which aims at ensuring both functioning of the Community’s transport systems and the protection of the environment; whereas technical measures it is appropriate take to (1) OJ C 118, 17. 4. 1998, p. 20, and OJ C 329, 27. 10. 1998, p. 10. (2) Opinion delivered on 1 July 1998 (OJ C 284, 14. 9. 1998, p. 1). (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 16 September 1998 (OJ C 313, 12. 10. 1998, p. 94), Council common position of 16 November 1998 and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (2) Whereas the Commission communication on the future development of the common transport policy: a global framework to the construction of a Community framework for sustainable mobility explicitly introduction of a the non-addition rule for the noisiest aeroplanes; refers to the Council, (3) Whereas the fifth action programme of 1992 on the environment, the general approach of which was endorsed by the Council and the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within resolution of in 1 February 1993 (4) envisages further legislative measures aimed at reducing noise emissions from aeroplanes; whereas the said programme lays down the objective that no person should be exposed to noise levels which endanger health and quality of life; their (4) Whereas the growth in air transport activities at Community airports increasingly subject to is environmental constraints; whereas the operation of these airports can less noisy aeroplanes at contribute to a better use of available airport capacity; (5) Whereas older types of aeroplanes modified to improve their noise certification level have a noise (4) OJ C 138, 17. 5. 1993, p. 1. C 404/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 performance which is significantly worse, mass for mass, than that of modern types of aeroplanes originally certificated to meet the standards of Volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, third edition (July 1993); whereas those modifications life of an aeroplane that would prolong the normally have been such modifications tend to worsen the gaseous emissions performance and fuel burn of earlier technology aero engines; whereas aeroplanes may be re-engined to achieve a noise performance comparable to that of those originally certificated to meet Chapter 3 requirements; retired; whereas Civil Aviation, second edition 1988 (1), as well as the extent of the non-addition provisions for Chapter 2 aeroplanes as laid down in Council Directive 89/629/EEC of 4 December 1989 on the limitation of noise emission from civil subsonic jet aeroplanes (2); (11) Whereas, in order to ensure equal treatment of country of aeroplanes regardless of the in registration, non-complying aeroplanes registers of Member States should also be stopped in accordance with the terms from operating imposed on non-complying aeroplanes in the registers of third countries; their types of aeroplanes (6) Whereas a rule which prohibits the addition of those older modified to Member States’ registers as from 1 April 1999 can be considered as a protective measure aimed at preventing a deterioration of the noise situation around Community airports as well as improving the situation regarding fuel burn and gaseous emissions; (7) Whereas in a Community without internal frontiers it is appropriate to exclude from this non-addition rule aeroplanes entered in any Member State’s register prior to 1 April 1999; (8) Whereas, in view of existing Community legislation on aeroplane noise, the present initiative needs to be taken at Community level by binding Community rules; (9) Whereas a non-addition rule, and a non-operation transition period, rule with an appropriate combines technical feasibility with environmental benefits without imposing an undue economic burden; (10) Whereas it by is necessary to minimise possible distortions establishing of competition equivalent requirements applicable to aeroplanes registered in third countries; whereas, since the Community has no competence over third-country registers, that objective can be achieved only by restricting the operation of non-complying aeroplanes registered as from 1 April 1999 in third countries; whereas the date for introducing such restrictions should take account of the final cut-off date for the operation of Chapter 2 aeroplanes as provided for in Council Directive 92/14/EEC of 2 March 1992 on the limitation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 2, Volume I of Annex 16 to the Convention on International (12) Whereas, given that the main objective of the measure is to limit noise at Community airports, aeroplanes may be exempted from the non-addition they are not and non-operation rules when operated in the Community territory; whereas, in order full environmental benefits, temporary exemptions may be possible only for operations of an exceptional nature; to produce these rules their for (13) Whereas the provisions of this Regulation shall not the overseas departments be referred to in Article 227(2) of the Treaty, in view of their geographical location; implemented in (14) Whereas it is necessary to gather information concerning the exemptions granted by the Member States; (15) Whereas arrangements for greater cooperation over the use of Gibraltar airport were agreed in London on 2 December 1987 by the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom in a joint declaration by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the two countries; whereas such arrangements have yet to come into operation, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Objective The objective of this Regulation is to lay down rules to prevent deterioration in the overall noise impact in the (1) OJ L 76, 23. 3. 1992, p. 21. Directive as amended by Directive 98/20/EC (OJ L 107, 7. 4. 1998, p. 4). (2) OJ L 363, 13. 12. 1989, p. 27. 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/3 Community of recertificated civil subsonic jet aeroplanes while at the same time limiting other environmental damage. Article 3 Non-complying aeroplanes Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ‘civil subsonic jet aeroplane’ shall mean a civil subsonic jet aeroplane with a maximum certificated take off mass of 34 000 kg or more, or with a certified maximum internal accommodation for the aeroplane type in question consisting of more than 19 passenger seats, excluding any seats for crew only, and powered by engines with a by-pass ratio of less than three; ‘recertificated civil subsonic jet aeroplane’ shall mean a civil subsonic jet aeroplane initially certificated to Chapter 2 or equivalent standards, or initially not noise-certificated which has been modified to meet Chapter 3 standards either directly through technical measures or indirectly through operational jet aeroplanes which restrictions; civil subsonic the initially could only be dual-certificated standards of Chapter 3 by means of weight restrictions, have to be considered as recertificated aeroplanes; civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which have been modified to meet Chapter 3 standards by being completely re-engined with engines having a by-pass ratio of three or more are not to be considered as recertificated aeroplanes; to ‘Chapter 2’ and ‘Chapter 3’ shall mean the noise standards as defined in Volume I, Part II, Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 respectively, of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, third edition (July 1993); restrictions’ imposed on shall mean weight ‘operational restrictions the aeroplane and/or operational limitations within the control of the pilot or the operator, such as reduced flap setting; ‘registration of an aeroplane’ shall mean the formal is act whereby the nationality of an aeroplane established through its entry on the national register of a Member State or a third country; 6. ‘the territory of the Community’ shall mean the territory of the Community subject to the provisions of the Treaty. 1. Recertificated civil subsonic jet aeroplanes shall not be registered in the national register of a Member State as from 1 April 1999. 2. Paragraph 1 shall not affect civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which were already on the register of any Member State on 1 April 1999 and have been registered in the Community ever since. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Directive 92/14/EEC and in particular Article 2(2) thereof, as from 1 April 2002 recertificated civil subsonic jet aeroplanes registered in a third country shall not be allowed to operate at airports in the territory of the Community unless the operator of such aeroplanes can prove that they were on the register of that third country on 1 April 1999 and prior to that date have been operated, between 1 April 1995 and 1 April 1999, into the territory of the Community. Recertificated civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which 4. are on the registers of Member States may not be operated at airports in the territory of the Community as from 1 April 2002 unless they have been operated in that territory before 1 April 1999. Article 4 Exemptions 1. Member States may grant temporary exemptions from Article 3 for civil subsonic jet aeroplanes whose operations are of such an exceptional nature that it would be unreasonable temporary exemption, such as for emergencies. On a transparent and non-discriminatory basis, Member States may limit such exemptions to certain airports and/or certain specified periods of the day. to withhold a from 2. Member States may grant exemptions Article 3 for civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which are exclusively operated outside the Community. territory of the 3. Member States may grant exemptions from Article 3 for civil subsonic jet aeroplanes leased to an operator which for that reason have been temporarily removed from the register of the Member State in which they were registered during the 6 months before 1 April 1999, provided that legal and economic ownership of the aircraft remains in the Member State. C 404/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 4. Once a year Member States shall inform the Commission of exemptions granted under this Article. Article 5 Overseas departments to This Regulation shall not apply the overseas departments referred to in Article 227(2) of the Treaty, neither with regard to the provisions concerning the registration of recertificated civil subsonic jet aeroplanes in the national registers of Member States, nor concerning the operation of such aeroplanes at airports located in the said departments. Article 6 The airport of Gibraltar respective legal positions of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom with regard to the dispute over sovereignty over the territory in which the airport is situated. 2. Application of the provisions of this Regulation to Gibraltar airport shall be suspended until the arrangements in the joint declaration made by the Foreign Ministers of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom on 2 December 1987 have come into operation. The Governments of Spain and the United Kingdom shall inform the Council of that date. Article 7 Entry into force 1. The application of this Regulation to the airport of Gibraltar is understood to be without prejudice to the This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at. For the Council The President 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/5 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION On 10 March 1998, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a Council Directive on the registration and operation within the Community of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which have been modified and recertificated as meeting the standards of Volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, third edition (July 1993) (1). The proposal is based on Article 84(2) of the EC Treaty. The European Parliament delivered its opinion at first reading on 16 September 1998 (2). The Economic and Social Committee delivered its opinion on 1 July 1998 (3). The Commission amended its proposal in the light of the opinion of the European Parliament and transmitted it to the Council on 30 September 1998 (4). The Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 189c of the Treaty on 16 November 1998. II. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSAL The proposal aims at preventing the deterioration of the overall noise impact around Community airports by laying down a regime for the operation and registration of acoustically modified older aircraft, commonly referred to as ‘hushkitted aircraft’. III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION The common position follows the proposal in its two main elements: (i) a ‘non-addition’ rule, aimed at prohibiting Member States from adding acoustically modified older aeroplanes to their registers as from 1 April 1999; and (ii) a ‘non-operation’ rule as from 1 April 2002, aimed at stopping the operation, in the in third territory of the Community, of non-complying aeroplanes registered countries. In order to ensure a non-discriminatory treatment of all aeroplanes irrespective of their country of registration, the common position also contains a third element concerning the aeroplanes registered in Member States, i. e. : (iii) a ‘non-operation’ rule as from 1 April 2002, aimed at stopping the operation, in the territory of the Community, of non-complying aeroplanes registered in Member States. Exemptions of a temporary and exceptional nature may be granted by Member States. (1) OJ C 118, 17. 4. 1998, p. 20. (2) OJ C 313, 12. 10. 1998, p. 94. (3) OJ C 284, 14. 9. 1998, p. 1. (4) OJ C 329, 27. 10. 1998, p. 10. C 404/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 In view of their geographical location, the airports in the French overseas departments are not covered by the Regulation. The application of the Regulation to the airport of Gibraltar is suspended pending bilateral agreement between the Member States concerned about the use of this airport. IV. AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. Amendments by Parliament, wholly or partly accepted by the Council and the Commission (i) The following amendment was accepted in its entirety: — amendment 1, the conversion of the Directive into a Regulation. (ii) The following amendments were accepted in substance, while using a slightly different wording and presentation: — amendments 2, 3 and 4 concerning new recitals expressing the need to monitor the development of the aircraft noise situation and, if necessary, propose new measures, as well as the need to prohibit the abuse of exemptions, were incorporated as Commission and Council statements to be included in the minutes of the Council at which the Regulation is adopted. The definite dates for the Commission to submit new proposals were removed in order to allow some flexibility. 2. Amendments by Parliament, not accepted by the Commission, nor by the Council Amendment 5 on the wording of Article 3(1) was not accepted as its substance was considered to be already covered by the draft text. Amendment 7 on the possibility of Member States to regulate the operation of certain Chapter 3 aeroplanes operating at their airports between 11 pm and 7 am was not accepted since Member States already are entitled to impose these kind of operational restrictions based on existing Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92. V. AMENDMENTS BY THE COUNCIL, NOT PROPOSED BY PARLIAMENT Apart from the modifications already outlined above and certain smaller changes of an editorial nature, in particular with a view to the conversion of the proposal for a Directive into Regulation, the Council carried out the following amendments to the Commission’s proposal: The recitals The Council redrafted the preamble in the light of the amendments carried out with regard to the Commission’s proposal. The Council added certain recitals in order to reflect new provisions introduced into the text. Definitions (Article 2) The Council improved the definition of ‘recertificated aeroplane’ by referring more explicitly to dual certification thereby also mentioning, in particular, aeroplanes that could only be initially dual certificated by means of weight restrictions, as this was considered to be in line with the purpose of the Regulation to prevent the deterioration of efficiency of aeroplanes due to recertification. In addition, the Council explicitly excluded re-engined 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/7 aeroplanes (i. e. aeroplanes whose engines have been completely replaced) as these aeroplanes have noise performance comparable to those originally certificated to meet Chapter 3 standards. Non-operation rule of non-complying aeroplanes in the registers of third countries (Article 3(3)) In order to simplify the implementation of the Regulation concerning aeroplanes on the registers of third countries, the Council specified a more precise time period during which the recertificated aeroplanes should have been operated in the Community in order to be able to continue operation after the non-operation rule takes effect. It is up to the operator of such aeroplanes to prove that they were operated according to the rules set out in Article 3(3). Non-operation rule for aeroplanes registered in Member States (new Article 3(4) of the common position) In order to ensure non-discriminatory treatment of aeroplanes regardless of their country of registration, the Council extended the non-operation rule imposed on aeroplanes in the registers of third countries also to those registered in Member States by adding a paragraph 4 in Article 3. Exemptions (Article 4) The Council removed direct reference to humanitarian aid flights as it considered that those flights are already sufficiently covered by the draft text referring to flights of an exceptional nature. Exemptions may be limited to certain airports and/or certain specified periods of the day so that local conditions may be taken into account. The Council introduced a new paragraph 3 to allow the exemption of leased aeroplanes temporarily removed from the register of a Member State as this practice would not be considered detrimental to the objective of the Regulation. French overseas departments (new Article 5 of the common position) The Council introduced a new article to exclude the airports of French overseas departments from the Regulation, as this was not considered a temporary exemption in the meaning of Article 4 to be granted by Member States on a case-by-case basis. Penalties (Article 5 of the proposal) The Council deleted the Article concerning penalties as it considered this irrelevant in a Regulation exclusively concerning Member States’ administrations. Reporting on exemptions (new Article 4(4) of the common position) The Council, at the request of the Commission, added a paragraph obliging the Member States to provide information to the Commission on the exemptions granted. The airport of Gibraltar (new Article 6 of the common position) The Council suspended the application of the Regulation in the airport of Gibraltar pending agreement between the Member States concerned on the use of this airport