COMMON POSITION (EC) No 70/98 adopted by the Council on 23 November 1998 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council adopting a programme of Community action on injury prevention in the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2003)
23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/21 COMMON POSITION (EC) No 70/98 adopted by the Council on 23 November 1998 with a view to the adoption of Decision No. /98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council adopting a programme of Community action on injury prevention in the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2003) (98/C 404/05) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and indent of Article 129(4) thereof, in particular the first Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (3), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (4), (1) Whereas, throughout the Community, injuries must be considered as one of the major health scourges referred to in Article 129 of the Treaty; whereas they are a cause of substantial public concern; (2) Whereas Article 129 of the Treaty expressly provides for Community competence in this field in so far as the Community contributes towards ensuring a high level of human health protection by encouraging cooperation between the Member States and, if necessary, by lending support to their action by promoting coordination of their policies and programmes, and by fostering cooperation with third countries and international organisations competent in the field of public health; whereas Community action should be directed towards the prevention of diseases and the promotion of health education and information; (1) OJ C 202, 2. 7. 1997, p. 20, and OJ C 154, 19. 5. 1998, p. 14. (2) OJ C 19, 21. 1. 1998, p. 1. (3) OJ C 379, 15. 12. 1997, p. 44. (4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 11 March 1998 (OJ C 104, 6. 4. 1998, p. 119), Council common position of 23 November 1998 and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (3) Whereas, in accordance with Article 3(o) of the Treaty, Community action includes a contribution to the attainment of a high level of health protection; (4) Whereas, in its communication of 24 November 1993 on the framework for action in the field of public health, the Commission identified intentional and unintentional injuries and accidents as a priority area for action in the public health field; (5) Whereas the large number of injuries caused each year in Europe has incalculable repercussions not only for the individuals concerned but also in social and economic terms; (6) Whereas prevention, and the consequent reduction, of injuries should be a priority in the context of Community action in the field of public health, particularly in view of the great social and economic benefit to be derived from a Community measure, the cost-benefit ratio of which is also exceptionally favourable; (7) Whereas in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, such as action on injury in prevention, accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, only if and in so far as the objective of the proposed action can, by reason of its scale or effects, be better archieved by the Community; the Community takes action, (8) Whereas Community action on injury prevention will yield added value by bringing together activities already undertaken in relative isolation at national level and by enabling them to complement one another, with significant results the Community as a whole; for (9) Whereas an action programme the to help reduce undertaken injuries; should be incidence of (10) Whereas the activities carried out in the framework of the Community system of information on home C 404/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 leisure accidents (EHLASS), which was and introduced by Decision No 3092/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) and expired at the end of 1997, produced positive results; whereas therefore be continued; should they for the telematic interchange of data between administrations (IDA); (16) Whereas cooperation international organisations competent in the field of public should be health and with fostered; third countries with implementation of this programme (11) Whereas one of the essential preconditions for is the the injury data- establishment of a Community collection and information system; whereas this system should be based on strengthening and improving on the achievements of the former EHLASS system; (12) Whereas the implementation of the Community data collection and information exchange system necessarily presupposes compliance with legal provisions concerning the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the introduction of arrangements to guarantee the confidentiality and security of such data; whereas in this connection the European Parliament and the Council adopted Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (2); (13) Whereas it is of paramount importance for the epidemiology of for determining injuries and Community health indicators as referred to in the European Decision No 1400/97/EC of Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 adopting a programme of Community action on health monitoring within the framework for action in the field of public health (1997—2001) (3); information is whereas data exchanged on the basis of comparable and consistent data on injuries; collected and information (14) Whereas, by providing support for acquiring better knowledge and understanding of, and wider dissemination of injury prevention, ensuring improved comparability of information in this field and developing actions complementary to existing Community programmes and unnecessary duplication, this programme will contribute to the achievement of the Community objectives set out in Article 129 of the Treaty; actions, while avoiding about, should (15) Whereas, in general, Community action on injury prevention the take applications of telematics in the health sector; whereas, implementation of this programme should be closely coordinated with projects of common interest under the programme in particular, account into (17) Whereas this programme should be of a five-year duration in order to allow sufficient time to achieve the objectives set; (18) Whereas, in order to increase the value and impact of this programme, a continuous evaluation of the actions undertaken should be carried out, with particular regard to their effectiveness and the achievement of the objectives set; (19) Whereas it should be possible to adjust or modify this programme in the light of its evaluation and of any developments that may take place in the general context of Community action in the field of public health; (20) Whereas it is important that the Commission should ensure implementation of this programme in close cooperation with the Member States; (21) Whereas a modus vivendi (4) between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concerning the implementing measures for acts adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Tretay was reached on 20 December 1994; (22) Whereas this Decision lays down, for the entire duration of this programme, a financial framework constituting the principal point of reference, within the meaning of point 1 of the declaration of the the European Parliament, Commission of 6 March 1995 (5), for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure, the Council and HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Article 1 Objective of the programme 1. A programme of Community action on injury prevention, hereinafter referred to as ‘this programme’, is hereby adopted for the period from 1 January 1999 to (1) OJ L 331, 21. 12. 1994, p. 1. (2) OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995, p. 31. (3) OJ L 193, 22. 7. 1997, p. 1. (4) OJ C 102, 4. 4. 1996, p. 1. (5) OJ C 102, 4. 4. 1996, p. 4. 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/23 31 December 2003 in the framework for action in the field of public health. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by 2. the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective. 2. The aim of this programme shall be to contribute to public health activities which seek to reduce the incidence of injuries, particularly injuries caused by home and leisure accidents, by promoting: (a) the epidemiological monitoring of injuries by means of a Community system for the collection of data and the exchange of information on injuries based on strengthening and improving on the achievements of the former EHLASS system; (b) information exchanges on the use of those data to contribute to the definition of priorities and better prevention strategies. The Community in 3. paragraph 2(a) and the specific action referred to in paragraph 2(b) to be implemented under this programme are set out in the Annex. referred system to Article 5 Committee 1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission. 2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken concerning: (a) the committee’s rules of procedure; (b) an annual work programme indicating the priorities for action; Article 2 Implementation The Commission shall ensure, in close cooperation 1. with Member States, the the Community system and the specific action set out in the Annex, in accordance with Article 5. implementation of (c) (d) The Commission shall cooperate with institutions injury in 2. and organisations active prevention. field of the the arrangements, procedures and specifications regarding content and finance necessary to ensure the implementation of the Community system set out in Part A of the Annex, including those relating to the participation of the countries referred to in Article 6(2); and projects for the arrangements, criteria and procedures selecting the financing implementation of the specific action set out in Part B of the Annex, including those involving cooperation with organisations in the sphere of public health and competent in participation of Article 6(2); the countries international referred for to (e) follow-up and evaluation procedure; Article 3 Consistency and complementarity The Commission shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between the Community system and the specific action to be implemented under this programme and the actions implemented under other Community programmes, initiatives, particularly in the field of accidents, road safety, product safety and civil protection. actions and Article 4 Financing (f) (g) the procedures for coordination with programmes and initiatives which are of direct relevance to achievement of the aim of this programme; arrangements the institutions and organisations Article 2(2). for cooperating with referred to the in The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft measures referred to above within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote. the Member States within 1. The financial framework for the implementation of this programme for the period referred to in Article 1 is hereby set at ECU 14 million. The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in C 404/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event: implemented as regards the specific action covered by Part B of the Annex in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 5. — the Commission shall defer application of the measures which it has decided for a period of two months from the date of such communication, — the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the first indent. In addition, the Commission may consult the the 3. committee on any other matter concerning implementation of this programme. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account. The representative of the Commission shall keep the 4. committee regularly informed of: — financial assistance granted under this programme (amount, duration, breakdown and beneficiaries), — Commission proposals or Community initiatives and the implementation of programmes in other fields which are of direct relevance to achievement of the to ensure objective of consistency and complementarity as referred to in Article 3. this programme, so as Article 6 International cooperation 2. This programme shall be open to participation by the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in accordance with in the Association Agreements or Additional Protocols relating thereto concerning participation in Community programmes. the conditions laid down This programme shall be open to participation by Cyprus and Malta on the basis of additional appropriations in accordance with the same rules as those applied to the countries of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), under procedures to be agreed with those two countries. Article 7 Monitoring and evaluation In the implementation of 1. the Commission shall take the measures necessary to ensure the monitoring and continuous evaluation of this programme, taking account of the aim set out in Article 1. this Decision, into these two reports The Commission shall submit an interim report to 2. the European Parliament and to the Council during the third year of operation of this programme and a final report upon completion of this programme. It shall incorporate information on Community financing within the framework of this programme and on consistency and complementarity with the programmes, actions and initiatives referred to in Article 3, as well as the results of the evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those reports shall also be submitted to the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The interim report should also take account in developments occurring within the framework for Community action in the field of public health. 3. On the basis of the interim report referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission may, if necessary, make appropriate proposals for modifications or adjustments to this programme. Subject to Article 228 of the Treaty, in the course 1. of implementing this programme, cooperation with third countries and with international organisations competent in the sphere of public health shall be encouraged and For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President Done at. 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/25 ANNEX THE COMMUNITY SYSTEM AND THE SPECIFIC ACTION TO BE IMPLEMENTED TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1(2) A. COMMUNITY INJURY DATA-COLLECTION AND INFORMATION-EXCHANGE SYSTEM 1. The objective of the Community data collection and information exchange system on injuries, hereinafter referred to as ‘the system’, will be to collect information on injuries, particularly those resulting from home and leisure accidents. 2. The system will be implemented by recourse principally to telematic means and in particular to the telematic network Euphin (European Union public health information network), developed under the projects of common interest within the programme for the telematic interchange of data between administrations (IDA). 3. The system will be developed on the basis of the experience acquired with, and the assessment made of, the earlier EHLASS system. 4. The data will be collected, in accordance with the collection systems submitted for that purpose by the Member States, from hospitals and/or other appropriate establishments and services, and by means of surveys. The collection and transmission of data to the information system will be carried out under the responsibility of the Member States, which shall seek to ensure the reliability of sources. 5. Special attention must be given to: — the methodology of the collection of data for the purposes of comparability and compatibility, — the criteria for the representativity of data, — guaranteeing the quality of data. 6. The data must be codified, using an approach based on the common criteria of the coding manual of the earlier EHLASS system. 7. The arrangements for access to the system by the various organisations and associations will be established within the framework of the implementation of this programme. B. SPECIFIC ACTION ON EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF INJURIES AND EXCHANGES OF INFORMATION The objective of this specific action is to encourage, strengthen and support the creation of Community networks concerning the epidemiology of injuries and exchanges of information devoted in particular to the following functions: — promoting concerted approaches to all technical and methodological aspects, in particular codes and definitions and the collection of data, — making comparable and compatible data available to the system and communicating them to it, — examining the coverage provided by existing data-collection systems and, if necessary, studying identification of survey improve that coverage; contributing to the intended to measures requirements, — promoting the creation of a database that includes the results of the surveys, — carrying out the collection, processing and dissemination of information, — facilitating the identification of dangerous products, — developing new approaches to and innovative methods of dealing with problems, — analysing risk factors and preventation strategies. C 404/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 15 May 1997 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council adopting a programme of Community action from 1999 to 2003 on injury prevention in the context of the framework for action in the field of public health, based on the first indent of Article 129(4) of the EC Treaty (1). 2. The European Parliament delivered its opinion on 11 March 1998 (2). The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions delivered their opinions on 29 October (3) and 18 September 1997 (4) respectively. 3. In the light of the European Parliament’s opinion, the Commission forwarded an amended proposal to the Council on 16 April 1998. 4. On 23 November 1998 the Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 189b of the Treaty. II. OBJECTIVE This proposal covers a programme on injury prevention; its purpose is to contribute to public health activities that seek to reduce the incidence of injuries, particularly injuries caused by home and leisure accidents, by promoting: (a) the epidemiological monitoring of injuries by means of a Community system for the collection of data and the exchange of information on injuries based on strengthening and improving on the achievements of the former EHLASS system; (b) information exchanges on the use of those data to contribute to the definition of priorities and better prevention strategies. III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL General remark The Council’s main changes to the Commission’s amended proposal, which was submitted further to the European Parliament opinion and largely incorporates the latter’s proposed amendments, were dictated by the need both to build a flexible and functional framework for continuing the EHLASS activities and for strengthening and improving on the achievements of the EHLASS programme, which expired at the end of 1997, and to coordinate the data-collection system with the injury prevention activities. The programme’s objectives (Article 1) The Council has deleted the references to specific groups of people and causes of injury and opted for a broad approach thus allowing a degree of flexibility in the programme’s implementation. It has, however, added a reference, which is not restrictive, to injuries caused by home and leisure accidents, which serves to emphasise the fact that account (1) OJ C 202, 2. 7. 1997, p. 20. (2) OJ C 104, 6. 4. 1998, p. 119. (3) OJ C 19, 21. 1. 1998, p. 1. (4) OJ C 379, 15. 12. 1997, p. 44. 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/27 has been taken of the experience acquired under the earlier EHLASS programme. When opting for this more general approach, the Council also considered that the definition of injury should be deleted. Implementation (Article 2) As there is only one network for data collection and the exchange of information on epidemiological monitoring, which is described in Part A of the Annex to the common position, the Council saw no reason to go further than the wording used for other action programmes. Consistency and complementarity (Article 3) In view of the broad approach chosen with regard to data collection and information exchange on injuries, the Council felt the need to be more specific so as to circumscribe the programme’s scope. Committee (Article 5) The Council decided against the procedure proposed and chose (as for existing programmes), a mixed-type procedure, which reconciles the need for flexibility in managing certain aspects of the programme with the need to involve Member States more actively in taking certain important decisions, in particular in deciding on the arrangements, procedures and specifications for the content and finance necessary to ensure injury data-collection and the information-exchange system. implementation of the Community Monitoring and evaluation (Article 7) The Council has aligned the wording of this Article with that used in other action programmes so as to reflect the changes made in the structure of this programme, to strengthen the monitoring process and to take account of potential developments in the Community’s public health activities. Programme content (Annex) The Council has reorganised and condensed the content of the Annexes, given the funding available, and shifted the focus of prevention activities to transnational schemes and those offering the greatest Community added value. More specifically this involved providing for a single network combining data-collection and information-exchange activities regarding prevention, in order to make for more efficient management of the various activities and smoother coordination between them. On the data-collection side, the Council has introduced a broad and flexible approach, which takes into account both the differing practices and realities of data collection in the Member States and the data-collection being carried out under other Community programmes and schemes. It has accordingly deleted the explicit references to intentional injuries, suicide and self-inflicted injuries. Moreover, the Council took the view that targeting specific groups of people would narrow this programme’s scope, while certain groups were also covered by other Community schemes. Regarding the implementation of the Community system and in particular the representativeness of activities and the financial support given to them, the Council, for technical reasons, considered that the task of specifying the arrangements should be left to the Commission under the committee procedure. C 404/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 12. 98 On the prevention side, the Council considered that prevention should be focused on transnational networks. Consequently some of the proposed prevention activities, which are more the responsibility of the Member States, have not been incorporated, in particular campaigns and consultation exercises. 2. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AMENDMENTS (a) Amendments incorporated by the Commission into its amended proposal The Commission accepted 23 of the 28 amendments adopted by the Parliament at first reading, as follows: — 12 amendments accepted in full (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16, 19, 22, 24), — 11 amendments accepted in part (1, 5, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 23, 25, 26, 28). (i) Amendments accepted by the Council The Council has incorporated 13 of those amendments into its common position, whether with drafting amendments, in substance or in part. — amendment 1 (recital 7): incorporated in another form into recital 11 and Article 1(2)(a), — amendment 2 (recital 7a — new): content incorporated into recital 5 with drafting amendments, — amendment 3 (recital 7b — new): incorporated in full into recital 6 with drafting amendments, — amendment 5 (recital 8b — new): first part incorporated in slightly modified form into recital 11, — amendment 6 (recital 8c — new): incorporated in full into recital 12 with wording aligned on that used for other public health action programmes; — amendment 7 (recital 8d — new): incorporated into recital 13 with amendments reflecting the Council’s choices as to scope, — amendment 11 (recital 10b — new): incorporated in part into recital 15 (reference to the telematics programme), — amendment 12 (recital 10c — new): partially incorporated in amended form into recital 15 (first sentence), — amendment 13 (recital 10d — new): partially incorporated in amended form into recital 15 (second sentence), — amendment 15 (recital 11a — new): incorporated in full into recital 21 with wording aligned on that used for other public health programmes, — amendment 16 (Article 1(2)): incorporated in part, — amendment 19 (Article 3(1)): aligned on the standard form of words and incorporated into Article 4, — amendment 25 (Annex, section 1): incorporated in part into section A of the Annex (reference to the earlier EHLASS system) and into section B of the Annex (networks). (ii) Amendments rejected by the Council The Council was unable to follow the Commission’s proposal to incorporate the following amendments proposed by the Parliament: — amendment 4 (recital 8a — new): there is no provision corresponding to this recital in the enacting terms of the common position, 23. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 404/29 — amendment 8 (recital 8e — new): the Council did not accept this amendment, since acts of violence, which are covered by another Community scheme, are not included in the common position, — amendment 9 (recital 8f — new): the Council saw no direct link between this text and the enacting terms, — amendment 17 (Article 1a — new): in line with the broad and open approach taken by the Council, the latter decided against adopting definitions of ‘injury’ and ‘epidemiological monitoring’, — amendment 18 (Article 2(1a) — new): the Council considered that the organisation of the text of the common position made this amendment redundant, — amendment 22 (Annex, section I, Title) in liaison with amendment 16 (first part of Article 1(2)): the Council took the view that intentional injuries (acts of violence) were covered by a Community scheme and the targeting of specific groups of people would be too restrictive, — amendment 23 (Annex, section II, Title): given the broad and flexible this amendment could not be the Council, taken by approach incorporated, — amendment 24 (Annex, Actions), amendment 26 (Annex, section 3) and — amendment 28 (Annex, after point 5): With the restructuring of the Annex, these amendments have become redundant. (b) Amendments not incorporated by the Commission into its amended proposal (i) The Council rejected the following amendments: — amendment 14 (recital 10e — new): the Council did not consider that this amendment fell within the scope of this programme, — amendment 20 (Article 4): the Council rejected this amendment in the interests of consistency with similar provisions in other public health programmes, — amendment 21 (Article 5(1), first subparagraph), which is at odds with the committee procedure Decision, — amendment 27 (Annex, section 4), which no longer has a counterpart in the common position. (ii) However, the Council did incorporate the content of amendment 10 into Article 3 (consistency and complementarity) in a more precisely worded form. IV. CONCLUSIONS The Council has reorganised and condensed the content of the programme, opting for a broad and flexible approach which covers in substance the proposed objectives of the programme and aims to ensure the best results in terms of Community added value and cost-benefit ratio