Commission Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 of 29 April 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway with regard to certain exporters, imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon with regard to certain exporters, amending Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings concerning imports of such salmon and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon Council Directive 1999/29/EC of 22 April 1999 on the undesirable substances and products in animal nutrition
4. 5. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 115/13 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 929/1999 of 29 April 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway with regard to certain exporters, imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon with regard to certain exporters, amending Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings concerning imports of such salmon and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (3) Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, On 26 September 1997, the Commission adopted Decision 97/634/EC (6), accepting undertakings offered in connection with the two abovemen- tioned proceedings from the exporters mentioned in the Annex to the Decision and terminating the investigations in their respect. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2), and in particular Article 8 thereof, not members of Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries the European not members Community (3), and in particular Article 13 thereof, of (4) On the same day, the Council, by Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 (7) and (EC) No 1891/97 (8) imposed anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway. Imports of farmed Atlantic salmon exported by companies from which an undertaking had been accepted were exempted from that duty pursuant to Article 1(2) of that Regulation. After consulting the Advisory Committee, (5) Whereas: The abovementioned Regulations set out the defin- itive findings and conclusions on all aspects of the investigations. The form of the duties having been reviewed, Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and (EC) No 1891/97 were replaced by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999. A. PREVIOUS PROCEDURE (1) (2) On 31 August 1996, the Commission announced, by two separate notices published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, the initia- tion of an anti-dumping proceeding (4) as well as an anti-subsidy proceeding (5) in respect of imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway. The Commission sought and verified all informa- tion that it deemed necessary for the purpose of its definitive findings. As a result of this examination, it was established that definitive anti-dumping and countervailing measures should be adopted in order to eliminate the injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation. All interested parties were informed of the results of the investigation and were given the opportunity to comment thereon. (1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. (2) OJ L 128, 30. 4. 1998, p. 18. (3) OJ L 288, 21. 10. 1997, p. 1. (4) OJ C 253, 31. 8. 1996, p. 18. (5) OJ C 253, 31. 8. 1996, p. 20. B. PROVISIONAL MEASURES IMPOSED BY COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 82/ 1999 (9) (6) The text of the undertakings provides that failure to submit a quarterly report of all sales transactions to the first unrelated customer in the Community within a prescribed time limit (except in case of force majeure), would be construed as a violation of the undertaking, as would non-compliance with the obligation to sell the different presentations of the product concerned (i. e. gutted, head-on, etc. ) on the Community market at or above the minimum prices foreseen in the undertaking. (6) OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 81. (7) OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 1, repealed by Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 (OJ L 101, 16. 4. 1999, p. 1). (8) OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 19, repealed by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999. (9) OJ L 8, 14. 1. 1999, p. 8. L 115/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 4. 5. 1999 (7) (8) (9) For the second quarter of 1998, 10 Norwegian companies either did not present a report within the prescribed time limit (or did not submit any report and two Norwegian exporters appeared to have sold the product concerned to the Community market at a price which was below the price foreseen in their undertakings. all), at The Commission therefore had reason to believe that these 12 companies had breached the terms of their undertakings. Consequently, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 82/1999, imposed provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic Salmon falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00, ex 0304 10 13, ex 0303 22 00 and ex 0304 20 13 originating in Norway and exported by the 12 companies listed in the Annex to that Regu- lation. By the same Regulation, the Commission deleted the companies concerned from the Annex to Decision 97/634/EC, which listed the com- panies from which undertakings were accepted. C. PROCEDURE FOLLOWING IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES duties received (10) All 12 Norwegian companies subject to the provi- sional in writing concerning the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which these provisional duties were imposed. They were also given an opportunity to submit comments and request a hearing. disclosure (11) Within the time limit set in the provisional duty the Norwegian companies Regulation, nine of concerned submitted comments In addition, comments were submitted by the Norwe- gian Seafood Association on behalf of two of the companies subject to the provisional measures. Following receipt of these written submissions, the Commission sought and examined all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of a definitive determination on the apparent violations. in writing. (12) Of the 12 companies subject to the provisional five requested (and were granted) a measures, hearing. D. DEFINITIVE FINDINGS ü REPEAL OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES FOR SIX COMPANIES they had sent (14) With regard to the 10 Norwegian exporters which to the submitted their quarterly report either Commission late, or did not submit a report at all, two companies, Kr Kleiven & Co. AS and Scanfood AS, claimed that their quarterly reports to the Commission by electronic mail within the due time period. However, it was found subsequently that this electronic mail contained an incorrect the Commission service dealing with the monitoring of anti- the dumping undertakings, with the result reports did not reach the department concerned. The companies both claimed that they did not, as usually happens with undelivered electronic mail, receive a ‘mail-fail' message from, in this case, the Commission’s electronic mail-failure service. internal address that for (15) Having examined the additional evidence put forward by the companies subsequent to the im- position of the provisional measures, the Commis- sion is satisfied that the companies did indeed try to send their reports within the prescribed dead- line. After also investigating the matter further with regard to the functioning of its own electronic the Commission considers mail-failure system, that, at the time of submission of their reports, Kr Kleiven & Co. AS and Scanfood AS might not, for temporary technical reasons, have received noti- fication of non-receipt from its mail-server. Their claim that they were unaware that the reports had not been received by the competent Commission department is therefore accepted and, accordingly, definitive measures should not be imposed against these two companies. (16) Another company which failed to submit its quar- terly report within the prescribed time limit, Nor-Fa Food AS, claimed in mitigation that, whilst preparing the report during the month following the end of the quarter in question, it encountered on two occasions serious technical problems with regard to special computer diskettes used by Norwegian companies for compiling the sales data for the reports. These problems led to the final preparation of the report being delayed and its eventual despatch to the Commission to be after the deadline for in the Commission’s offices. receipt Subsequent to the imposition of provisional meas- ures, Nor-Fa Food AS also provided evidence from the business consultancy firm which supplied the diskettes confirming that the company had indeed encountered problems initially with their use. (13) The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account in the definitive findings. (17) The company also argued that it was, at that time, a company newly admitted to the system of under- takings and that the quarterly report in question was the first one it had submitted to the Commis- sion. 4. 5. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 115/15 (18) Having considered the matter further and after examination of the new arguments and evidence put forward, the Commission is now satisfied that the company had genuine difficulties in fulfilling it had been its reporting obligations and that confronted with circumstances which were beyond its control. Accordingly, definitive measures should not be imposed against Nor-Fa Food AS. (19) A fourth company whose report was received late, Norway Seafoods ASA, attempted to submit its report for the second quarter of 1998 by electronic mail, but its electronic message was not accepted by the Commission’s mail server because of its size. (20) Following the imposition of provisional measures, the company argued that the Commission’s mail server appears to have been faulty as the actual size of the the message sent was nowhere near maximum handling capacity of the mail server and its message should have been received satisfactorily. (21) As mentioned above with regard to Kr Kleiven & the Commission has Co. AS and Scanfood AS, checked the functioning of its own electronic mail- failure system at the time when the quarterly reports in question were due. It is considered that Norway Seafoods ASA could not have reasonably expected their report to be refused by the Commis- sion’s mail server which, at the time, may not have been fault-free. The claim of Norway Seafoods ASA that it was confronted with a situation over which it had no control is therefore accepted. Accordingly, definitive measures should not be imposed against this company. (22) exceptional difficulties with regard Following the imposition of provisional measures, another company further elaborated on its claim that to personnel caused its report to be sent late. The further clarifications and explanations provided by the company showed that it encountered difficul- ties which were unforeseeable. Consequently, definitive measures should not be imposed against this company. price for the quarter was higher and in conformity with the minimum import price. Accordingly, the provisional duties imposed against this company should be repealed. E. DEFINITIVE FINDINGS ü VIOLATION OF UNDERTAKINGS BY SIX COMPANIES (24) As concerns the five other companies which failed to respect their obligations to report on time, none of them have provided further satisfactory evidence subsequent to final disclosure that circumstances which were beyond their control had prevented them from submitting their quarterly reports within the due period. (25) Accordingly, definitive measures should be imposed against these five companies. (26) come The other company against which provisional measures were imposed due to apparent violations of the minimum import price, Brødrene Remo, did not forward with any explanations or evidence which would have put in question the provisional findings. It is therefore concluded that definitive measures should also be imposed against this company. (27) All the the interested parties were informed of essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to either repeal the provi- sional measures imposed against them and rein- state them on the list of companies from which undertakings are accepted, or confirm the with- drawal of the Commission’s acceptance of their undertaking and to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of provisional duties. The com- panies were also granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to this disclosure. Comments received were taken into account where appropriate. (23) One of the two companies against which provi- sional measures were imposed due to apparent violations of the minimum import price, SMP Marine Produkter AS, provided calculations which showed that company had inadvertently deducted from a sales transaction a certain amount for customs duty which had in fact been paid by the customer in the Community (and was not therefore deductible as a direct selling expense). Without this erroneous deduction, the average sales the (28) In parallel to this Regulation, the Commission is submitting a proposal for a Council Regulation imposing definitive anti-dumping and counter- vailing duties on farmed Atlantic salmon origin- ating in Norway and exported by the remaining seven companies which are subject to the provi- sional duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 82/ 1999, namely A Ovreskotnes AS, Alsvag Fiskepro- dukter A/S, Brødrene Remo AS, Hitramat & Deli- katesse AS, Seacom Nord AS and Stavanger Røkeri AS. L 115/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 4. 5. 1999 F. NEW VIOLATION CASES (29) As mentioned above, all exporters from which undertakings have been accepted are required to submit a quarterly sales report within a prescribed period to the Commission, and also to respect minimum prices for the various presentations of the product concerned. With regard to the third quarter of 1998, a Norwegian exporter, Atlantic Seafood A/S failed to comply with its obligation to present a report within the prescribed time limit. The company was informed of the consequences of late reporting and, in particular, that should the Commission have reasons to believe that its under- taking is being violated, a provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duty may be imposed pursuant to Article 8(10) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and Article 13(10) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97, respectively. (30) The company was also invited to provide evidence of any force majeure which caused the late submis- sion of its report. However, no conclusive evidence thereof has been provided. (31) Also, whilst monitoring the reports relating to the third quarter of 1998, it appeared that one exporter, Myre Sjømat AS, had made sales to the Community market below the minimum price foreseen in the undertaking. (32) In order to determine the veracity and accuracy of the information provided in the quarterly reports furnished by exporters, on-the-spot verification visits at the premises of selected companies are performed by the Commission on a regular basis. In this regard, a series of visits was made in in Norway and November 1998 to exporters importers in the Community. Visits were also made to Norwegian exporters in January 1999. (33) One of the companies visited in Norway, Brødrene Eilertsen AS, had submitted quarterly reports to the Commission which purported to show that it had made sales of the product covered by the under- taking to customers in the Community in accord- ance with the terms of the undertaking. The verifi- cation revealed, however, that the company had not bought and sold the products mentioned in its reports but had, instead, simply issued invoices to importers in the Community on behalf of another Norwegian company, which had not offered an undertaking to the Commission and for which it acted as an agent. Indeed, although Brødrene Eilertsen AS issued export invoices and reported these to the Commission as its own sales, payment for the goods was made directly to the other Norwegian company by in the Community. the buyers (34) Another Norwegian company sole customer visited, Arne Mathiesen AS, was found to have exported the product concerned exclusively to an unrelated importer in the Community. However, Arne Mathiesen AS sourced much of this salmon from a Norwegian supplier which was related to Mathie- sen’s in the Community. With regard to the exports sourced from this supplier, the investigation showed that Arne Mathiesen AS did not actually pay the supplier for the goods. As concerns these goods, whilst Arne Mathiesen AS issued the export invoices, payment for the goods thereon was made directly by the Community importer to its related supplier in Norway, and not to Arne Mathiesen AS. Instead of receiving the full invoiced amount, Arne Mathiesen received the difference between the supposed purchase invoice and the amount appearing on the export invoice. ‘resale' of (35) Accordingly, neither Brødrene Eilertsen AS or Arne Mathiesen AS can be considered as exporters for the purposes of their undertakings as they do not exercise any control over the actual price of the goods. This also means that the price paid by the customer in the Community to the Norwegian supplier companies without an undertaking cannot be monitored at all by the Commission. (36) is therefore provisionally It concluded that Brødrene Eilertsen AS and Arne Mathiesen AS have made misleading declarations as to the iden- tity of the exporter and the identity and nature of the sales reported, which constitutes a breach of their undertakings. G. IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES VIOLATION FOLLOWING APPARENT CASES (37) Having regard to all the above, there are reasons to the undertakings accepted by the believe that Commission from Atlantic Seafood AS, Myre Sjømat AS, Brødrene Eilertsen AS and Arne Mathiesen AS are being violated. (38) (39) It is therefore considered imperative that, pending further investigation of these apparent violations, provisional duties be imposed against these com- panies. In accordance with Article 8(10) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and Article 13(10) of Regulation (EC) the anti-dumping and No 2026/97, countervailing duty respectively must be estab- lished on the basis of the best information avail- able. the rate of 4. 5. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 115/17 (40) In this regard, and in view of recital 107 of Regula- tion (EC) No 1890/97 and recital 149 of Regulation (EC) No 1891 /97 it is considered appropriate that the provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duty rates be set at the level and in the form imposed by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999. raised no objections. Pursuant to Article 2 of Regu- lation (EC) No 772/1999 therefore, the Annex to that Regulation should be amended to grant exemption from payment of anti-dumping and countervailing duties to this company. H. FINAL CONSIDERATION CONCERNING IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES (47) (41) In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed in which interested parties may make known their views in writing and request a hearing. (42) (43) (44) (45) (46) I. NEW EXPORTER imposition of definitive Following the anti- dumping and countervailing duties, several com- panies made themselves known to the Commission claiming to be new exporters and offered under- takings. In this regard, one such company, Westmarine AS, demonstrated that it had not exported the product concerned to the Community during the invest- igation period which led to the current anti- dumping and countervailing duties. The company also showed that it was not related to any of the companies in Norway which are subject to the anti-dumping and countervailing duties. Finally, the company provided evidence that it had entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant amount of the product concerned to the Community. exporting farmed Atlantic The undertaking offered is identical in its terms to those previously offered by other Norwegian salmon companies originating in Norway and it is considered that acceptance of such an undertaking from this exporter will be sufficient to remove the effects of injurious dumping and subsidisation. Since the exporter has agreed to provide the Commission with regular and detailed information on its exports to the Community, it is concluded that the undertaking can be monitored effectively by the Commission. The undertaking offered by this company is there- fore considered acceptable. The company has been informed of the essential facts and considerations upon which acceptance of the undertaking is based. The Advisory Committee was consulted and has J. CHANGE OF NAME In addition, two other Norwegian exporters, Saga Lax Nord AS and Hydro Seafood Sales AS, advised the Commission that the names of the companies had been changed to Prima Nor AS and Hydro Seafood Norway AS respectively. The Commission has therefore verified and confirmed that there were no changes to their corporate structures which warranted a more detailed examination of the appropriateness of the companies maintaining their undertakings. Accordingly, these companies should be amended in the Annex to Decision 97/634/EC. the name of K. AMENDMENT OF THE ANNEX TO DECISION 97/634/EC (48) The Annex to Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings in the context of the present anti- dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings should be amended to take account of the reinstatement of the undertakings given by Kr Kleiven & Co. AS, Misundfisk AS, Nor-Fa Food AS, Norway Seafoods ASA, Scanfood AS and SMP Marine Produkter AS, in respect of which the provisional duties should be the undertaking accepted from West- repealed, marine AS and the changes of name to Prima Nor AS and Hydro Seafood Norway AS. (49) For the sake of clarity, an updated version of this Annex should be published, showing the exporters whose undertakings remain in force. HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 imposed against The provisional anti-dumping and countervailing 1. duties the following companies by Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 in relation to farmed (other than wild) Atlantic salmon originating in Norway falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00 (Taric code: code: 0302 12 00* 19), 0304 10 13*19), ex 0303 22 00 (Taric code: 0303 22 00*19) and ex 0304 20 13 (Taric code: 0304 20 13*19), are hereby repealed: 0304 10 13 (Taric ex L 115/18 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 4. 5. 1999 UT No Company name Taric additional code 80 98 126 153 168 191 Kr Kleiven & Co. AS Midsundfisk AS Norway Seafoods ASA Scanfood AS SMP Marine Produkter AS Nor-Fa Food AS 8182 8202 8314 8264 8279 8102 2. The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 is hereby replaced by Annex I to the present Regulation. 3. Any amounts secured by way of the provisional anti- dumping and countervailing duties imposed by Regula- tion (EC) No 82/1999 from Kr Kleiven & Co. AS, Misundfisk AS, Norway Seafoods ASA, Scanfood AS, SMP Marine Produkter AS and Nor-Fa Food AS shall be released. Article 2 1. (a) Provisional ex and countervailing anti-dumping duties are hereby imposed on imports of farmed (other than wild) Atlantic salmon falling within code: CN codes code: 0302 12 00*19), 0304 10 13*19), code: 0303 22 00*19) and ex 0304 20 13 (Taric code: 0304 20 13*19) originating in Norway and exported by the companies listed in Annex II to the present Regulation. 0302 12 00 0304 10 13 0303 22 00 (Taric (Taric (Taric ex ex (b) These duties shall not apply to wild Atlantic salmon (Taric codes: 0302 12 00*11, 0304 10 13*11, 0303 22 00*11 and 0304 20 13*11). For the purpose of this Regulation, wild salmon shall be that in respect of which the competent authorities of the Member States of landing are satisfied, by means of to be all provided by interested parties, that it was caught at sea. and transport documents customs 2. (a) The rate of the countervailing duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, shall be 3,8 % (Taric code: 8900). (b) The rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, shall be EUR 0,32 per kilogram net product weight (Taric code: 8900). However, if the free-at- Community-frontier price, including the counter- vailing and anti-dumping duties, is less than the relevant minimum price set out in paragraph 3, the anti-dumping duty to be collected shall be the difference between that minimum price and the free-at-Community-frontier price, including the countervailing duty. For the purpose of paragraph 2, the following 3. minimum prices shall apply per kilogram net product weight: Presentation of salmon Minimum price Euro/kg net product weight Taric code Whole fish, fresh or chilled 2,925 0302 12 00*21 Gutted, chilled Gutted, chilled head-on, fresh or 3,25 0302 12 00*22 headless, fresh or 3,65 0302 12 00*23 Other, including ‘steaks' fresh or chilled, 3,65 0302 12 00*29 Whole fish, frozen 2,925 0303 22 00*21 Gutted, head-on, frozen Gutted, headless, frozen 3,25 3,65 0303 22 00*22 0303 22 00*23 Other, frozen, including ‘steaks' 3,65 0303 22 00*29 Whole fish fillets, more than 300 gr each, fresh or chilled 5,19 0304 10 13*21 fish fillets Other fillet portions, 300 gr or less each, fresh or chilled or 6,55 0304 10 13*29 Whole fish fillets, more than 300 gr each, frozen 5,19 0304 20 13*21 fish fillets fillet Other portions, weighing 300 gr or less each, frozen or 6,55 0304 20 13*29 Article 3 The following company shall be added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 UT No Company name Taric additional code 192 Westmarine AS 8625 Article 4 The Annex to Decision 97/634/EC is hereby replaced by Annex III hereto. 4. 5. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 115/19 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 5 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 29 April 1999. For the Commission Leon BRITTAN Vice-President L 115/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 4. 5. 1999 ANNEX I List of companies subject to provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties Taric additional code 8095 8098 8128 8154 8270 8282 No 1 5 30 65 159 171 Company A. Ovreskotnes A/S Alsvag Fiskeprodukter A/S Brødrene Remo A/S Hitramat & Delikatesse AS Seacom Nord AS Stavanger Røkeri AS ANNEX II List of companies on which provisional duties are imposed by Article 2 UT No Company Taric additional code 14 24 28 99 Arne Mathiesen A/S Atlantic Seafood A/S Brødrene Eilertsen A/S Myre Sjømat AS 8112 8122 8126 8203 4. 5. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 115/21 ANNEX III ANNEX TO DECISION 97/634/EC List of the 110 companies from which undertakings are accepted, as updated on 5 May 1999 UT No Company name TARIC additional code 3 7 8 11 13 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 26 27 31 32 33 35 36 39 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 Agnefest Seafood Aqua Export A/S Aqua Partner A/S Arctic Group International Artic Superior A/S A/S Aalesundfisk A/S Austevoll Fiskeindustri A/S Keco A/S Refsnes Fiskeindustri A/S West Fish Ltd Astor A/S Atlantic King Stranda A/S Borkowski & Rosnes A/S Brødrene Aasjord A/S Christiansen Partner A/S Clipper Seafood A/S Coast Seafood A/S Dafjord Laks A/S Delfa Norge A/S Domstein Salmon A/S Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse Edvard Johnsen A/S Eurolaks AS Euronor AS Fiskeforsyningen AS Fjord Aqua Group AS Fjord Trading Ltd. AS Fossen AS Fresh Atlantic AS Fresh Marine Company AS Fryseriet AS 8325 8100 8101 8109 8111 8113 8114 8115 8118 8119 8120 8121 8124 8125 8129 8130 8131 8133 8134 8136 8138 8139 8140 8141 8143 8144 8145 8147 8148 8149 8150 L 115/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 4. 5. 1999 UT No Company name TARIC additional code 58 60 61 62 66 67 72 75 76 77 79 80 82 83 85 87 92 93 96 98 100 101 104 105 107 108 111 112 113 114 115 116 119 120 121 122 123 124 126 Grieg Seafood AS Haafa fisk AS Hallvard Lerøy AS Herøy Filetfabrikk AS Hydro Seafood Norway AS Hydrotech-gruppen AS Inter Sea AS Janas AS Joh. H. Pettersen AS Johan J. Helland AS Karsten J. Ellingsen AS Kr Kleiven & Co. AS Labeyrie Norge AS Lafjord Group AS Leica Fiskeprodukter Lofoten Seafood Export AS Marine Seafood AS Marstein Seafood AS Memo Food AS Midsundfisk AS Naco Trading AS Namdal Salmon AS Nergård AS Nils Williksen AS Nisja Trading AS Nor-Food AS Nordic Group ASA Nordreisa Laks AS Norexport AS Norfi Produkter AS Norfood Group AS Norfra Eksport AS Norsk Akvakultur AS Norsk Sjømat AS Northern Seafood AS Nortrade AS Norway Royal Salmon Sales AS Norway Royal Salmon AS Norway Seafoods ASA 8300 8302 8303 8304 8159 8428 8174 8177 8178 8179 8181 8182 8184 8185 8187 8188 8196 8197 8200 8202 8206 8207 8210 8211 8213 8214 8217 8218 8223 8227 8228 8229 8232 8233 8307 8308 8309 8312 8314 4. 5. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 115/23 UT No Company name TARIC additional code 128 130 134 137 140 141 142 144 145 146 147 148 151 153 154 155 156 157 158 160 161 162 164 165 167 168 172 174 175 176 178 180 182 183 187 188 189 190 191 192 Norwell AS Nova Sea AS Ok-Fish Kvalheim AS Pan Fish Sales AS Polar Seafood Norway AS Prilam Norvège AS Pundslett Fisk Rolf Olsen Seafood AS Ryfisk AS Rørvik Fisk- og fiskematforretning AS Saga Lax Norge AS Prima Nor AS Sangoltgruppa AS Scanfood AS Sea Eagle Group AS Sea Star International AS Sea-Bell AS Seaco AS Seacom AS Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS Seanor AS Sekkingstad AS Sirena Norway AS Kinn Salmon AS SL Fjordgruppen AS SMP Marine Produkter AS Stjernelaks AS Stolt Sea Farm AS Storm Company AS Superior AS Terra Seafood AS Timar Seafood AS Torris Products Ltd. AS Troll Salmon AS Vie de France Norway AS Vikenco AS Wannebo International AS West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS Nor-Fa Food AS Westmarine AS 8316 8235 8239 8242 8247 8248 8251 8254 8256 8257 8258 8259 8262 8264 8265 8266 8267 8268 8269 8271 8272 8273 8275 8276 8278 8279 8283 8285 8286 8287 8289 8294 8298 8317 8321 8322 8323 8324 8102 8625