WRITTEN QUESTION E-0301/00 by Hartmut Nassauer (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Promotion of European legal culture in the Czech Republic.
C 26 E/30 Official Journal of the European Communities EN 26. 1. 2001 (2001/C 26 E/040) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0300/00 by Hartmut Nassauer (PPE-DE) to the Commission (11 February 2000) Subject: Unsettled property claims between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Czech Republic As is well known, the Federal Republic of Germanyís government has invariably condemned the expulsion of the Germans from Czechoslovakia and the uncompensated confiscation of German property as an infringement of international law. The German Government has always emphatically upheld this position. The political significance of these unsettled property claims for the Communityís legal system cannot be resolved by referring to Article 295 of the EC Treaty. How does the Commission view these still unsettled property claims in connection with the accession negotiations with the Czech Republic, and is it prepared to help rectify this injustice? (2001/C 26 E/041) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0301/00 by Hartmut Nassauer (PPE-DE) to the Commission (11 February 2000) Subject: Promotion of European legal culture in the Czech Republic On 8 March 1995 the Czech Republicís constitutional court ruled in the Dreithaler Case that the deprivation of the rights of the German population and their deportation under the so-called Benesch decrees were in accordance with the legal principles of Europeís civilised societies. Accordingly the Law of 8 May 1946, for instance, on the legality of activities connected with the fight for the liberation of Czechs and Slovaks, remains on the statute book. This law is an amnesty for criminal offenders and provides these arbitrary measures, which continue to have effect, with a legal basis that is still applicable today. Is the Commission aware of this judgment, and in view of the forthcoming accession negotiations how does it view the fact that discriminatory laws, directed against other Member States or some of their citizens, are in force in the Czech Republic? Does the Commission agree that the abolition of such decrees and laws would be a welcome contribution to the common European legal system? (2001/C 26 E/042) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0302/00 by Hartmut Nassauer (PPE-DE) to the Commission (11 February 2000) Subject: European Parliament resolution of 15 April 1999 on the report from the Commission on the Czech Republicís progress towards accession (1998) In its resolution on the regular report (1998) from the Commission on the Czech Republicís progress towards accession (A4-0157/1999) (1) of 15 April 1999 Parliament called on the Czech Government to repeal the surviving laws and decrees from 1945 and 1946 insofar as they concerned the expulsion of individual ethnic groups in the former Czechoslovakia. In its 1999 progress report the Commission states that it took this resolution into account when drawing up that report. Can the Commission state whether, following this resolution, it has conducted talks with the Government of the Czech Republic on these laws and decrees, and how it intends to take this request by the European Parliament into account in the course of the accession negotiations? (1) OJ C 219, 30. 7. 1999, p. 443