WRITTEN QUESTION E-2858/99 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Incomplete implementation by the Region of Lazio of the directives on environmental impact assessment.
C 303 E/120 Official Journal of the European Communities EN 24. 10. 2000 (2000/C 303 E/120) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2855/99 by Jonas Sjöstedt (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (18 January 2000) Subject: Provisions of new law on animal feed Following a tightening-up of Swedish law to bring it into line with an EU directive, the countryís zoos are now prohibited from using uninspected meat as animal feed. Mice and chickens cannot therefore be fed to animals in zoos. All carnivorous zoo animals are now to be fed butchered, veterinary inspected meat from approved animal-feed factories instead, though snakes have been granted an exemption from this provision. However, sick eagle owls and other owls cared for by zoos also need to eat animals whole, including the fur, for their digestion. This has, nevertheless, been deemed prohibited by the Swedish law and the EU directive on which it is based. Does the Commission take the same view? Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission (9 February 2000) Under Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos (1), Member States have an obligation to ensure that all zoos maintain a high standard of animal husbandry, with a developed programme of nutrition for the animals under their care. The Directive in question does not however specify dietary measures in detail. These are matters for Member States to determine. (1) OJ L 94, 9. 4. 1999. (2000/C 303 E/121) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2858/99 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission (18 January 2000) Subject: Incomplete implementation by the Region of Lazio of the directives on environmental impact assessment With reference to previous questions tabled by the same Member on environmental impact assessment and Directive 85/337/EEC (1) and subsequent amendments, can the Commission say whether the directive has been effectively and fully transposed, in particular following the Italian Governmentís delegating powers to the Regions, especially the Region of Lazio, or whether there have been inaccuracies and/or parts which have not been transposed in their entirety? In particular, the car park in Via Sacchi in Rome, already mentioned in Question E-2084/99 (2), has led to a conflict of competences between Rome City Council, which issued the relevant authorisation without carrying out an environmental impact assessment, and the Region of Lazio, which did request an environmental impact assessment. (1) OJ L 175, 5. 7. 1985, p. 40. (2) OJ C 219, 1. 8. 2000, p. 87. Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission (23 February 2000) As regards the transposition of Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment in Italy and in particular in Regione Lazio, the Honourable Member is requested to refer to the response to her Written Question E-2084/99. The 24. 10. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 303 E/121 conformity of Italian regional legislation with Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 (1), amending Directive 85/337/EEC, is under assessment. It may be added that car parks are not specifically mentioned in the Annexes of Directive 85/337/EEC and, therefore, it is difficult to challenge the lack of specific transposition in relation to this class of projects. In contrast, Directive 97/11/EC, which is not applicable to the specific case because it applies to projects for which requests for development consent were submitted after 14 March 1999, specifically includes car parks among the projects of Annex II of the Directive (10 b). Conflicts between different bodies of the Italian administration are not relevant at Community level. It is only relevant that Community law be correctly applied. As for the application of Directive 85/337/EEC to this specific case, in the opinion of the Commission car parks could, even if not specifically mentioned, be covered by Annex II of Directive 85/337/EEC at number 10 b (as urban-development projects among the infrastructure projects). According to the Directive, projects of Annex II are to be made subject to an environmental impact assessment (EIA) where Member States consider that their characteristics so require. However, Member States are obliged to make a pre- assessment in order to establish whether projects of Annex II need to be made subject to an EIA procedure. Therefore, the Commission considers that failing to carry out a pre-assessment on a car park project which is likely to have significant effects on the environment represents an infringement of the Directive, while failing to make a car park the subject of an EIA procedure is not a breach of the Directive when the lack of significant impact of the project has been verified in a previous a pre-assessment. (1) OJ L 73, 14. 3. 1997. (2000/C 303 E/122) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2859/99 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission (18 January 2000) Subject: Public order and safety Safety on the streets is recognised as an important benefit for the population and is a public service paid for by public taxation. An adequate number of police and police stations must therefore be distributed all over the country. Unfortunately, in Rome, in particular in district XX, the situation is different ü there are whole areas in a state of decline, characterised by social unrest, frequented by drug addicts, alcoholics and immigrants, where there are not enough policemen, or else areas where there is no police station, although the district has requested one. The events being organised to celebrate the Millennium will only aggravate the situation. In view of all this, can the Commission say: 1. whether there are any research findings, data or examples of good practice concerning the logistic and organisational methods of the forces of law and order; 2. whether there are similar problems in the others countries of the Union and how they are being solved; 3. what its general opinion of the whole issue is? Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission (6 March 2000) The Commission shares the importance attached by the Honourable Member to ensuring safety and security on the streets