Philosophy in the Soviet Union
# Philosophy in the Soviet Union

Part of a series on :

Marxism :

Theoretical works

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844

The German Ideology

Wage Labour and Capital

The Communist Manifesto

The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte

Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie

A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy

Das Kapital

Critique of the Gotha Programme

Dialectics of Nature

Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism

The State and Revolution

History and Class Consciousness

On Contradiction

Prison Notebooks

Dialectic of Enlightenment

The Wretched of the Earth

Guerrilla Warfare

Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses

Women, Race and Class

Empire (Hardt and Negri book) :

Philosophy

Dialectical materialism

Philosophy of nature :

Critique of political economy

Capital (accumulation)

Crisis theory

Commodity

Concrete and abstract labor

Factors of production

Falling profit-rate tendency

Means of production

Mode of production

Asiatic

Capitalist

Socialist

Productive forces

Scientific socialism

Surplus product

Socially necessary labour time

Value-form

Wage labour :

Sociology

Alienation

Base and superstructure

Bourgeoisie

Class

Class consciousness

Class struggle

Classless society

Commodity fetishism

Communist society

Critique of political economy

Cultural hegemony

Democracy

Dictatorship of the proletariat

Exploitation

Human nature

Ideology

Immiseration

Imperialism

Lumpenproletariat

Metabolic rift

Proletariat

Private property

Relations of production

Reification

State theory

Working class :

History

Philosophy in the Soviet Union

Primitive accumulation

Proletarian revolution

World revolution

Theory of historical trajectory :

Aspects

Aesthetics

Archaeology

Criminology

Cultural analysis

Cultural Studies

Ethics

Film theory

Geography

Historiography

Literary criticism

Marxism and religion

Sociology

Philosophy :

Orthodox variants

Analytical

Black

Classical

Feminist

Hegelian

Humanist

Instrumental

Leninism

Trotskyism

Maoism

Neo

Open

Post

Structural

Western

Marxism–Leninism

Anti-revisionism

Marxism–Leninism–Maoism

Gonzalo Thought

Socialism with Chinese characteristics

Titoism :

Left communist variants

Bordigism

Communization

Council communism :

Libertarian variants

Autonomism

Situationism :

Other variants

Austromarxism

Eurocommunism

Neo-Gramscianism

Neue Marx-Lektüre

Revisionist :

People

Marx

Engels

Morris

Lafargue

Kautsky

Plekhanov

Du Bois

Connolly

Lenin

Luxemburg

Kollontai

Hilferding

Trotsky

Grossman

Zinoviev

Bloch

Lukács

Korsch

Bukharin

Bordiga

Ho

Serge

Gramsci

Pashukanis

Nosaka

Benjamin

Mao

Mariátegui

Toledano

Horkheimer

Volpe

Dutt

Brecht

Marcuse

Bordiga

Fromm

Neumann

Lefebvre

James

Adorno

Padmore

Sartre

Deutscher

Beauvoir

Nkrumah

Sweezy

Emmanuel

Hill

Bettelheim

Draper

Jones

Hobsbawm

Althusser

Hinton

Williams

Freire

Mandel

Sivanandan

Miliband

Lefort

Cabral

Thompson

Bauman

Fanon

Kosik

Berger

Castro

Guevara

Heller

Guattari

Mészáros

O'Connor

Wallerstein

Mies

Tronti

Debord

Amin

Hall

Nairn

Parenti

Negri

Jameson

Dussel

Harvey

Laclau

Bahro

Poulantzas

Vattimo

Badiou

Altvater

Anderson

Löwy

Resnick

Vogel

Sison

Easthope

Rancière

Berman

Przeworski

Blackburn

Cohen

Therborn

Ahmad

Losurdo

Ture

Postone

Rodney

Spivak

Newton

Sakai

Wood

Federici

Wolff

Balibar

Eagleton

Hartsock

Rowbotham

Mouffe

Geras

Brenner

Davis

Cleaver

Bishop

Haraway

Panitch

Clarke

Jessop

Davis

Wright

Fraser

Holloway

Screpanti

McLaren

Tamás

Hampton

Cano

Žižek

Sankara

Hennessy

McDonnell

Douzinas

Cockshott

Roediger

Foster

West

Ghandy

Marcos

Tarasov

Prashad

Merrifield

Varoufakis

Kelley

Linera

Fisher

Li

Barker

Coulthard

Malm

Seymour

Toscano

Bhattacharya

Moufawad-Paul

Srnicek

Horvat

Hamza

Saito :

Journals

Capital & Class

Capitalism Nature Socialism

Catalyst

Constellations

Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory

Historical Materialism

Mediations

Monthly Review

New Left Review

Race & Class

Rethinking Marxism

Science & Society

Socialism and Democracy

Socialist Register :

Related topics

21st-century communist theorists

Anarchism

Anarcho-communism

Creative destruction

Critical theory

Criticism of Marxism

Communism

Communalism

Economic determinism

Historical determinism

History of communism

Left-wing politics

Marxian economics

New Left

Old Left

Municipalism

Political ecology

Radical democracy

Social democracy

Socialism

Authoritarian

Democratic

Libertarian

Market

Reformist

Revolutionary

Utopian

Soviet democracy

Left-wing populism

Universal class

Vulgar Marxism

Economism

Worker cooperative

Workers' council :

Related categories Karl Marx

Philosophy of history :

Outline

 Communism portal

 Philosophy portal

 Socialism portal :

vte :

Philosophy in the Soviet Union was officially confined to Marxist–Leninist thinking, which theoretically was the basis of objective and ultimate philosophical truth. During the 1920s and 1930s, other tendencies of Russian thought were repressed (many philosophers emigrated, others were expelled). Joseph Stalin enacted a decree in 1931 identifying dialectical materialism with Marxism–Leninism, making it the official philosophy which would be enforced in all communist states and, through the Comintern, in most communist parties. Following the traditional use in the Second International, opponents would be labeled as "revisionists".

From the beginning of Bolshevik regime, the aim of official Soviet philosophy (which was taught as an obligatory subject for every course), was the theoretical justification of communist ideas. For this reason, "Sovietologists", among whom the most famous were Józef Maria Bocheński, professor of philosophy at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas and Gustav Wetter, have often claimed Soviet philosophy was close to nothing but dogma.

After the 1917 October Revolution, it was marked by both philosophical and political struggles, which call into question any monolithic reading. Evald Vasilevich Ilyenkov was one of the main philosophers of the 1960s, who revisited the 1920s debate between "mechanicists" and "dialecticians" in Leninist Dialectics and Metaphysics of Positivism (1979). During the 1960s and 1970s Western philosophies including analytical philosophy and logical positivism began to make a mark in Soviet thought.

## Philosophical and political struggles in the Soviet Union

Dialectical materialism was initially expounded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels; one of the early works on the subject is Engels’s 1878 polemic Anti-Dühring. It was elaborated by Vladimir Lenin in Materialism and Empirio-criticism (1908) around three axes: the "materialist inversion" of Hegelian dialectics; the historicity of ethical principles ordered to class struggle; and the convergence of "laws of evolution" in physics (Helmholtz), biology (Darwin) and political economy (Marx). Lenin hence took position between a historicist Marxism (Labriola) and a determinist Marxism, close to what was later called "social Darwinism" (Kautsky). Lenin's most important philosophical rival was Alexander Bogdanov (1873–1928), who tried to synthesize Marxism with the philosophies of Ernst Mach, Wilhelm Ostwald, and Richard Avenarius (which were harshly criticized in Lenin's Materialism and Empirio-criticism). Bodganov wrote a treatise on "tectology" and was one of the founders of Proletkult after the First World War.

Following the 1917 October Revolution, Soviet philosophy divided itself between "dialecticians" (Deborin) and "mechanists" (Bukharin, who would detail Stalin's thesis upheld in 1924 concerning "socialism in one country", was not a "mechanist" per se, but was seen as an ally.) The mechanists (A.K. Timiryasev, Axelrod, Skvortsov-Stepanov etc.), came mostly from scientific backgrounds, claimed that Marxist philosophy found its basis in a causal explanation of nature. They upheld a positivist interpretation of Marxism which asserted that Marxist philosophy had to follow the natural sciences. Stepanov thus wrote an article flatly titled "The Dialectical Understanding of Nature is the Mechanistic Understanding". To the contrary, "dialecticians", whose background was Hegelian, insisted that dialectics could not be reduced to simple mechanism. Basing themselves mainly on Engels' Anti-Dühring and Dialectics of Nature, they maintained that the laws of dialectics could be found in nature. Taking support from the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, they responded that the mechanists' conception of nature was too restricted and narrow. Deborin, who had been a student of Georgi Plekhanov, the "father of Russian Marxism", also disagreed with the mechanicists concerning the place of Baruch Spinoza. The latter maintained that he was an idealist metaphysician, while Deborin, following Plekhanov, saw Spinoza as a materialist and a dialectician. Mechanism was finally condemned as undermining dialectical materialism and for vulgar evolutionism at the 1929 meeting of the Second All-Union Conference of Marxist–Leninist Scientific Institutions. Two years later, Stalin settled by fiat the debate between the mechanist and the dialectician tendencies by issuing a decree which identified dialectical materialism as the philosophical basis of Marxism–Leninism. Henceforth, the possibilities for philosophical research independent of official dogmatics virtually vanished, while Lysenkoism was enforced in the scientific fields (in 1948, genetics were declared a "bourgeois pseudoscience"). However, this debate between "mechanists" and "dialecticians" would retain importance long after the 1920s.

Otherwise, David Riazanov was named director of the Marx–Engels Institute, which he had founded, in 1920. He then created the MEGA (Marx-Engels-Gesamt-Ausgabe), which was supposed to edit Marx and Engels' complete works. He also published other authors, such as Diderot, Feuerbach or Hegel. Riazanov was however excluded from any political functions in 1921 for defending trade unions' autonomy.

During the Fifth Comintern Congress, Grigory Zinoviev condemned for "revisionism" the works of Georg Lukács, History and Class Consciousness (1923) and of Karl Korsch, Marxism and Philosophy. History and Class Consciousness was disavowed by its author, who made his self-criticism for political reasons (he thought that, for a revolutionary, being part of the party was the priority). It became however a leading source of Western Marxism, starting with the Frankfurt School, and even influenced Heidegger's Sein und Zeit (1927). Lukács then went to Moscow in the beginnings of the 1930s where he would continue his philosophical studies, and returned to Hungary after World War II. He then took part in Imre Nagy's government in 1956, and was closely watched afterwards.

Lev Vygotsky's (1896–1934) studies in developmental psychology, which opposed themselves to Ivan Pavlov's works, would be expanded in the activity theory developed by Alexei Nikolaevich Leont'ev, Pyotr Zinchenko (a member of Kharkov School of Psychology), and Alexander Luria, a neuropsychologist who developed the first lie detector.

## After the 20th Congress of the CPSU

Nevertheless, the conditions for creative philosophical work began to emerge in the mid-1950s, after the 20th Congress of the CPSU in 1956, albeit only on the 'outskirts' of philosophy: the philosophy of the natural science (B. Kedrov, I. Frolov), theory of perception and gnoseology (P. Kopnin, V. Lektorsky, M. Mamardashvili, E. Ilyenkov), the history of philosophy (V. Asmus, A. Losev, I. Narski), ethics (O. Dobronitski), aesthetics (M. Kagan, L. Stolovitsh), logics (G. Shchedrovitsky, A. Zinovyev) and semiotics and system theories (J. Lotman, who set up the Sign Systems Studies journal, the oldest semiotics periodical; V. Sadovsky). The works of the young Marx, such as the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, which had been first published in 1932 but suppressed under Stalin because of its incomplete break with German Idealism, also started being discussed.

## Others

1) Vasily Nalimov (1910-1997) was interested mainly in the philosophy of probability and its biological, mathematical, and linguistic manifestations. He also studied the roles of gnosticism and mysticism in science. Nalimov is usually credited with proposing the concept of citation index.

2) The so-called "communist morality" was an important part of Soviet Union philosophy. According to Lenin and Stalin, morality should be subordinated to the ideology of proletarian revolution. Denying the validity of religion-based morality, they wrote: what is useful to us (the Soviet people) is moral, what is harmful to us is immoral. Morality is a weapon in class struggle. Party and Komsomol members were drilled to accept that position, and to act accordingly.

## Publications and propaganda

The USSR published voluminous materials to disseminate its philosophical ideals and justifications. These took the form of academic or professional journals or notes in the pattern of peer-reviewed material. For example, the book First All-Union Conference on the Problems of Medical Deontology challenges the idea of a medical deontology, or ethics based on moral rules, versus ethics based on utilitarian rules decided on the best outcome for the greatest number of people.

