Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1933
# Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1933

The Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1933 is an act of the Parliament at Westminster legislating for Scotland which introduced changes in Scottish legal procedure "following the recommendations of a Royal Commission which reported in $1927".^{:12}$

## Background to Act

The Act was introduced following the Royal Commission on the Court of Session and the Office of Sheriff $Principal.^{:12}$

## The Judiciary

The Act abolished the ancient practice of a trial (or examination) of qualifications of a nominee for appointment as a judge of the Court of Session (s. 1). The Bill Chamber was abolished (s. 3) and an additional division of the Inner House was created (s. 2). It provided new arrangements for the sittings of judges (granting them a power to extend a session if required) and for the work of the vacation judge (s. $4).^{:12}$

## Officers of the Courts

Provisions were made for the appointment of officers of the High Court of Justiciary and the Court of Session and their superannuation $arrangements.^{:13}$

## Civil procedure

### Court of Session

The Act ended the right of parties to choose the judge (Lord Ordinary) or Division for the hearing of their causes or appeals (s. 5). It simplified the form of proceedings (ss. 6-9) and created a procedure to allow summary trial (by a judge without a jury) (s. $10).^{:12}$

A procedure for a simple majority verdict by a jury was introduced (majority verdicts had long been available to criminal juries in $Scotland).^{:1078}$ Provision for made for situations where a juror died or became unfit to continue serving (s. 11).

### Rules Councils

A Rules Council for the Court of Session and another for the Sheriff Courts were established fashioned on the Rule Committee of the Supreme Court in England. They were given a power to draft rules regarding any matters about which Acts of Sederunt may be made. These were then to be submitted to the Court which might enact them (with or without amendment) in an Act of Sederunt. An express power was granted so that, as "in the similar provision for rules of court in England, an Act of Sederunt may "modify, amend or repeal any enactments, including enactments contained in this Act," relating to $procedure."^{:12}$

Both Scottish Rules Councils included representatives of the judiciary and the two branches of the legal profession (advocates and solicitors); and the Lord President of the Court of Session was made an ex officio member of both $Councils.^{:12}$

The statutory power to make Acts of Sederunt granted in sections 16 and 17 of the Act was consolidated and replaced by sections 5 and 6 of the Court of Session Act 1988 $(UK).^{:[16],[29],[50]}$

## Criminal procedure

Courts were given a discretion to continue a solemn proceeding in cases where a juror died or became unfit to continue serving, provided that the number of continuing jurors was not less than twelve. Should the jury return a majority verdict of guilty, there must be at least eight jurors supporting that $verdict.^{:12–13}$

Either side in criminal trials on indictment were given a right to admit documents without formal proof by the other side; by agreement between the prosecution and defence, copies of documents might be tendered as if they were the originals; but, if not legally represented, the accused may not so admit nor $agree.^{:13}$

## Sheriffdoms

A power to reorganise the then fifteen territorial sheriffs and the sheriff of Chancery was created. The Secretary of State for Scotland was permitted to form new sheriffdoms by uniting two or more counties or parts of counties should a vacancy occur in the office of sheriff; but such orders were not to take effect until both Houses of Parliament have resolved to approved $them.^{:13}$

## 1934 Rules of Court

After commencement of the Act, new Rules of Court for the Court of Session were embodied by Act of Sederunt in 1934. The then Lord President Clyde wrote in the Preface to the new $Rules:^{:[48]}$

    "The purpose of these Rules is not to provide a comprehensive summary of Court of Session procedure, but to reform and extend the existing procedure so far as necessary to adapt it to the new conditions created by the Act ....
    "As regards matters of procedure, the Act restores to the Court of Session its ancient autonomy which modern legislation had almost smothered."
