From the Advertiser of Oct. 87, 1Sil.
{"character_count": 1734, "word_count": 291, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9441999793052673], "ccnet_perplexity": [946.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
of our constitution is getting to be greatly admired by the democracy. MT. Campbell lauded as pecul- iary and essentially democratic in his speech at the Locofoco meeting on Saturday evening, The ten- dency of has drawn public attention to the consideration of this subject, and is for the people to decide, whether it is consistent with republican system of government, or whether it is not, in reality, monarchcal feature, which should be expunged from the constitution"

 {" The above is truly rum mistake to make. It shows an unfortunate obliviousness regardlessness of and stable principles, in eargerness reach party ends or revenge party wrongs. The President has made the great conservative VETO POWER of the constitution unpopular with the Clay

 ties, by nterposng it to arrest that batch of federal

 measures which Mir. Clay called the extra session \ rivet upon the natieu. Stralghtway MT, Clay dis covered that the veio po,pv an odious vesige of despotism. Any thing that stood between the peo- pie and the stupendous impostions and frauds of A national bank aristoOracy, was to be condemned unconstitutional, and the very brightest jewel in that priceless insrument-the impenetrable shield of

 the rights of the states and the liberties of the people to be sacrlegiously from the great charter to make way for vile moneyed desp6tism. Such is the ruthless stand taken by the bold, yet over ambitious and misguided man, who is determined at all hazards to be President of the Union. This ul- ly accounts for the course of {" Mir. Clay's man Charles" here. If MT. Clay says the veto power is " monarchieal," why, of course. It is so-no natter what he thought or said about it in lS39-and re adopted yesterday morning, Eet