{"character_count": 1412, "word_count": 238, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9373000264167786], "ccnet_perplexity": [1108.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Washington correspondent of the U. s. Gaz- zette at phlladelphia which pretty good Wing au- thority. glees currency 10 d runur, but without souch,n5 Tor 1t, of approaching changes in the Cab- net. The Cabinet, It IS said, unable to agree upon tine ineasur,s to he proposed to Congress. Among their difficulties is undoubtedly that of pro- tectie Tariff. to which Secretary Forward IS a jealous iilend ahe tic President is old opponent.

 fhe Bank question another difficulty Mr. Ty- Ter, Il is sd, will berletty thoroughly AntBank in all shapes and this will nos suit some of his adyis CTS.

 In relation to this subject, Mir. Henderson of Mis-. sssppi, has in letter addressed his constituents lately, expressed the opinion, that national Bank Is out ot ihe question: adding the significant query whether < modified and improved'' Sub-Treasury, would nol be the ''next most acceptable" plan Ger iainly the nearer Ii approaches the Sub-Freasury, the better it w be, and the nearer the wishes of the country. The abuse under which the Sub-Treas- ury was oserborne, in the midst of fiery party struggle, is losing s force, and the views of many in relation to the custody of the public money, and the improvement of the currency, convergng rapidly towards principles which they will be star

 tied day, al discovering to be the identical Sub Treasury doctrines which they so eager, once in endeayorng to decry.