{"character_count": 1218, "word_count": 222, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9434999823570251], "ccnet_perplexity": [2060.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
h the pfeseat tate of iSairs than any tlilng else The hest ay therefore t, him and hIs friends Is t0 take The deiet and pocket il lcnoy as all party me" are often obliged b. hoping for Letter fortune at the next trial. s>z

 If Mr. Everett were in truth an aholtionist, the question would then cone dp whether he ought tor that reason 10 be rejected. We should say al once that for many offices his abstract opinions npalf that point shonld uol disqualiiy him, ol any other mani hut as minister to England, the case presents a different aspect. That is lhe- government where schemrs.are constantly to nterfere mitif our regulations in reference to the slaves at the south Every is there resorted to for the purpose oi giving Us trouble upon this very subject Whenever a war is talked of, nsnrrection and murder m the slave states are threatened as the principal annoy ances which they will make suffer. Ought we, then, send an abolition fanatic minister to such Kingdom and such c0url No, never. We have said that we de not believe Mr. Everett to he such an abotonist but if he is, the Senate ought to re- jecthim. England is the last place on the face ol Gods earth where America should he represented by apabotionst.