The Washington correspondent of she New Ysrk Herald, suggests the folIowing;-- ,.l5e...- sst :;
{"character_count": 1539, "word_count": 265, "ccnet_language_score": [0.819599986076355], "ccnet_perplexity": [2213.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Washington correspondent of the New fsrk Herald, suggests the foIlowing;-- ,.lse.... ..'t E;

 "One fact. which seems entirely to have been lost sight of, may be mentioned here. sejenty 2 mf Jsdgs ef Ms Sxpvsme Cesf, as t t nos eonssspted' have expressed opinions adpss Co fhe ceHsffstsnaty af National Bank. The question may be brought up the 6rstten dollar note which bank shall issue Ssepose the former decision of this tribunal for the settlement of consssntiDnai questions should be re- sersed, what would be the consequsncel Such decision upon fscal agent on the Treasury plan, would nullify single branch only. On Mr. Chy's plan, it kills the whoie concern" N.

 By the way, what constitutes the difference be- tween the opinions of the present Supreme Judges and those who n favor of the coastitstionsliy of banks Are not shs opinions of the existing Judges as good as thess of the past1 Do not new Iehf, aew experience and new developsmeats in re- lasioa to se genius Of government. make the for- mer opinions nofs sosshy of consideration shaa the asssri If she past Supreme cosrsse pc csdsnt isf sks cosstiasioasy of baak. cannot ,he prelsat Cosr sssablish n precedent for ils uneoa- ssisstieasiisyf .s sEs.s {, .,s.3 -.:. ...,q

 These queries show al once the absupdity of uaing tke plea of prscedsnt. if t he q any Soree zsli, t is sqsaly dsciaive .en any sids ofa ssestion.

 fe uill heAasp( ftanate occsresos for tle peoPle sfthiy cosaisy vkss ssy sh.Il permit ssue hafdossn judges to sts bsyond appss o chsnss' fhe r'a'