{"character_count": 2506, "word_count": 420, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9541000127792358], "ccnet_perplexity": [1152.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
F5rfGt Register.

 Why do some men preach orthodox and practice heresyl The Register is denounced for copying from the Herald and thence prisimiliiude of prin- ciples all subjects is inferred But the Adyer- tser copies from all papers, and doubt if the editor is willing to have the standard applied to him. "Omnes si'nihd sin,iiiblis frahanfT, which m paln English means "show me your company, and will tell who you are," is truism based on sound req soningbut herein the difference between the two copysts: The one takes from the Herald only such articles expose the evils which o,ershadnw political horson-ays bare the nakedness of the esi doers, aud sounds the alarm to those who from apathy policy, either do not. pretend not, to see them. Now to copy such things, is not only ad- missable, but commendable. We do not reject the honey because it is extracted from poisons, ,-nor do disregard the raies because the snake also carries the of death. Different however, is it with the other. The articles which it republishes, arc from sources which ought to yield better things, whereas they contain the most baneiu doctrines, principles, subyersse of the original structure of government, and aiming decidedly fatal blow at the sovereignty, peace and safety of the SOh:-princi- pies which are now laying the mine whose explosion is destined to shver atoms the political arch by which bond of union is kept together. If there fore the articles c0pied to be considered re- speciyelS endorsed by the editors, which of the two is culpable! Asspredy under the present aspect of affairs, no Southern "aan would long ponder for an answer. Hyr f..tt

 These remarks are suggested, on reading letter written by the Hon. Jno. Nj. Bolts, of Va. offering his reason for voting in favor of receiving abolition petitions. The letter is republishcd with commenda- tions by the Advertiser whose editor roundly and qualifedly asserts, that the positions assumed by Mir. Bolts, are sound and correct, and cannot be overthrown;" and concludes by saying, "let those who ready denounce him, answer his arga- ments J they ean"

 In my next it shall be my business to take up this challenge and endeayor, if can," show that the arguments adduced by Mir. Bolts, neither "sound or correct" nor "constituiiona," are they com patible with " an ardent attachmen, the South"

 Should succeed in praying Mir. Botts to have acted through error either ofead heart, of course, all who endorse his principles share its fate.

 | HAMPDEN.