For the Reglatej
{"character_count": 1731, "word_count": 310, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9668999910354614], "ccnet_perplexity": [811.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
For the Register.

 The Advertiser says it had such mass of foreign news for the mornings paper, Ii could not spare room to abuse and msrepresent the speech of MT. Shields and yet more than half column is de- voted to foreign news. Why did the Advertiser not speak out this morning. will tell you. Its eloquent editor intends to make speech tonight himself and It Would not look well for him just to repeat over h,s moraings editorial, before the enlightened whig of Mobile.

 Besides, he knows that Mr. Shields intends leay- ing the city tonight, and it would be much con yenent 10 misrepr,sent his speech after he is absent These are truly worthy motives To actuate editor, but he knows, as we'll as l do, what weight they had with him.

 In the little tirade of this morning, however, he undertakes ts speak contempuo,sl of the talents of | Mir Shields This will do no great harm, for none in the country high as to escape the spleen of | this "Demostlenes." recollect in 1884, Mir. Lang don gave toast in Perry county, when he was a Jaekson man, in which he regretted that "helnp did not grow strong enough to hang John c. Calhoun J | or something to that effect. Still Mr. Calhoun has never been hung, notwithstanding the ardent desirt of this apostate. And we may hope that Mr. Shields will survive the learned and se,ee criticism of thi. mornings Advertiser.

 AWopos of applause.-Was it not amusing to sec | respectable EX-Governor who has grown grey in the ranks of democracy, melting the little clique o wings around him to applaud Mr. Shields when he spoke m merited terms of the talents of Alexander Hamilton ] wonder if that parsonage would have selected that special sentence for his applause ter | years ago! VlRTUS.