{"character_count": 2317, "word_count": 407, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9559999704360962], "ccnet_perplexity": [1177.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MR. WEBsTER.-The New York Courier and Enquirer takes occasion to be merry with this paper and the N. Y Evening Post (by the way, it has put us in very good company) for ,adulging some ncre- duty in relation to the infallibiliiy of Daniel Web- ster's craftsmanship and democracy. Ofcourse, we never expected to convince the Courier nor the more ardent of its northern federal associates. Our brie remarks were designed for own southern readers who have placed implicit faith in MT. Webster and we thought it not improbable that they might al, so goad the conscience of some whg papers in these parts whose custom it was short time ago to look upon that great "expounder of the constitution, , with any thing but favor and admiration.

 Ne one will pretend to deny that Mir Webster is a person of extraordinary talent In common with most of our countrymen, ready to confess that no one has exalted his country in the eyes of foreigners-but intellectual power and that no bier quality of mind which arrays itself on the side o truth and rises above local associations to compre bend principles which universal, may be otall, distinct and different; and while we admit that Mir Webster in an eminent degree possesses the one we as freely deny ha; he is gifted with the other Of course to demonstrate so abstract proposition i. almost impossible. a s.

 The school of politics in which MT. Webster wa' educated, overshadowed his great mind by it's inau ence i; and accordingly we find throughout his long public career, it has impressed itself upon every i'm portant measure in which he has taken part. Ii was this that made him an opponent of the late wal

 that made him so distrustful of the capacity of tho people for sefgovernmentas in all cases to adhere to that prominent dogma offederalism, that proper syas rie'tpe measure and basis of power s i, !i S%n x, language pqlea apwer ra,ufslly ant

 scefsar3 goes into the hsnds ! yNts ,hiF is,whai we defAefbi Bs gahta SaSSf,' depce in pnbIic virtue. It is a psfisaia Gom Eegliih siresand was so deeply imbibed by thi lo,dsaAraif,s 'hat'sfst'f sdherA to the members a tha, party in despite of the experience of fit, years This is also what we Americans understand by the term aristocracy. It is not the pride of person which shows itself in fine clothes--in a pompous 