{"character_count": 959, "word_count": 165, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9782999753952026], "ccnet_perplexity": [1191.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We perceive the Age IS endeavoring to create
jealousy between the Commercial and Agricul-
tural classes of this State, relation to the Val
uation Report. Ofcourse there is no just grounds
for any such complaint as the Age specifies. That
paper very plainly ntimates that the valuation on
the Sea-board has been underrated, whilst that
of the interior or farming portions of the State
has been rated full high enough. Now the fact
in the case is, the charge is totally unfounded,
and if such were the case, (Which we by no means
admit possible thing) the farming interest is
chargeable with the whole blame. The majority
of the Valuation Committee, represented the
Agricultural interest," and it sby means proba-
BILE, they would allow such an act of injustice to
be perpetrated. In the House too, the farming
interest was represented by two members, where
the Commercial interest had but one. The fact
is, the Age is a little too much inclined to hum
buggery.