MOBILE,
{"character_count": 3268, "word_count": 502, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8274999856948853], "ccnet_perplexity": [1131.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Mail this morning, brought Us great number of papers, amorg which are New-Yorll dates of the ,2lh--Balmore and Washington of the lIlh.

 The congressional proceedings ofFriday, the 10th, are interesting. The question of the rules was decd- ed then with unexpected promptness, and in man ner more satisfactory than we had hoped for.

 It will le remembered that all the rules of the 26th Congress, the Fist or Johnsons rue included, were adopted at the beginning of the session, tempo rarlly, until the report of the committee on rules, .kouId be discussed and determined on. That report was made the order of ihe day, for Friday, when Il was summarily disposed of by motion to lay it on the table, This was carried by the following 'ote

 YEAS-Messrs AtGerfon, Beeso,l, Biliack, Bo,ene, Bowed, Bre,cster Burke, Sampson II. Butter, w ,l- liam Butler William O. Butler, Green w. Caidweii Caruthers, CiBord, Clinton, Coies' Cross' Daniel Richard D. Daiis, Dawson, Dam, Doig, Eastman, Edwards Egbat, Faris, C. 4. Floyd, Fornance, Thomas r. Foster, Gerry, Gilmcr, Goggin, Gordon,

 C, ahau Ilahe sham, Harris, John Hastings, Hay s, Hspkins Iiouek, Houston, lubbard, Hunter Chaftes /. fngasoh, .JoS,ph R. hgGsoH, Jack, iam Cosl irew Kennedy, King, Lewis. Lhiictetd, LoueH, Ro- bert MeClriian, Mckay, Marchand, Alfred Marshall, John Thompson Mason, Mafheuy, Aiedi, Merlwether Miller, Moore, Neiohard, Parmentr, Payne, Ftumer' Pope Pr lift, Reding, Rhett, Riggs, Saunders, ohaW' Shp er,l, William Sm t Snyder, Sollers, Steenrod, Summers, Sumter. Talia.erio, Jacob IhomPson' Triplett, 1urney, Van Buren, Waiiace, hard, Hel- hr, Wesfbrook, James w. Williams, Christopher II. Williams, Joseph L. Hiliian,s, Wise, and Wood. -96.

 NAYs-Messrs Adams, Allen, Ladaf ". Aa- dreos, Shcl lock J. Andrews, Afnotd, Ayerigg' Babcock baker, Barnard, Bar, Boardman, Borden, Botts, Briggs, Brockwa,, Bronson, lhton BTown, Burn, Il, Calhoun, Ullam 3. CeapbeH, Casey, John C. Clark, StaIey N Clarke, Cowen, C. anson, Cush- ing Garrett Davis Debery, John Edwards, Everett, Fessendcn, Fillmore, John G. Floyd, A. Lawrence Foster, Gates, Curry Giddings, Patrick G. Goode, Granger, Hall, lIalsted, Henry, howard, Hudson, James Irwin, William w. lrwin, James, John P. Mattocks, Maynard, Morris, Morrow, Pendeton, Ramsey, Benjamin Randall, Randolph, Reynolds, Ridgway, Eodaey, Roosevelt, Russel, Sallons all, Simoton, Shade, Truman Smith, Hdniy, Stokely, Sira,ton, Ale1andcT II. II. Smart, John Y. Stuart, John B. Thompson, Richard IT. Thompson, Filling hast, Poland, Tannson, Trumbull, Unddwood Washington, Thomas w. Williams, Leuis Williams, Winthrop, York, Augustus Young, and John Young -SS.

 The report was accordingly laid upon he table, by majority of eight By the rules it requires two third vote to take it up again. So the matter is settled for this session, and abolition papers are excluded

 In our list above we have marked in italics the names of members in the affirmative, from non-slave holding states They are forty5fpe in number, three of whom only-J. k. IngesOn of Philadelphia, and Wallace and Proft of Indiana are whigs-the other forty-one are democrats. Among the nays-the italics arc of members from slave holding states that voted against us. They are ffieen-all whigs.