Enr the RepiSfer.
{"character_count": 1559, "word_count": 269, "ccnet_language_score": [0.968999981880188], "ccnet_perplexity": [697.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 Mir. Editor-I again call the attention of the citi- to the importance of requiring pledges from the candidates, who propose represent them at the Au- gust election, in regard to city charter Up to this period, the remarks through your paper from diff feren correspondents, have passed unnotced. pre- sume the reason may have been to await the nomina- tions of the whig party duty having been per formed, it IS to be hoped that the gentlemen whose names are presented for our sufirages, will in due time give clearly their views upon the propriety of materially changing the city charter. For one, am desirous ascertain what will be pursued by the candidates. have always believed it the duty of aspirants and give their views and let the people decide for or against those views. 1t is d settled principle with me- that in the absence of the known will of a constituency, the representative should use his own discretion. Thus, presume, the gentlemen who represented this county in the last gular as well as the called session, acted. They opposed repeal of the property qualification, for want of nlormaton-takng the ground that the peo- pie of the city satisfied with that feature in our city charter.

 do hope that the citizens will now speak for themselves, and instruct their representatives in tone not to be mistaken on the first Monday in Au- gust next, and demand a restoration of their lost rights tell to the world tAat the meie ownership of does not alone qualify voter, but that has personal rights as well as property rights.

 EQUAL RIGHTS.