{"character_count": 1641, "word_count": 280, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9616000056266785], "ccnet_perplexity": [578.7999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THE TwENTY-FIRsT RULE.-The following are

 some of the remarks of Julius c. Afford of Georgia

 against the compromise proposed by Mir. Stuart of

 Va. in relation to the principle of the reception of

 incendiary petitions. Mir. Afford is whg of the toughest hewing and according to the Advertiser, the Richmond Whis, and other kindred prints whose Southern affections, if they had aey, blinded by party, he is a "disorganiser," and only "pre- tended whis" for daring to place vital principle in- voving southern peace, before the convenience of extraordinary whig session, and the ineresed policy of the whig party which convened it. Mir. Afford was right-Mr. Wise was right-the question ought to have been met and settled without compromise or postponement, and it would have been met but for the eagerness of the Whig party to hurry to the of their purposes of corrupting the people and brbing the states by their distribution, National debt and Fiscal Bank projects. Mir. AL ford sad

 "Now, say that if you exclude the Fist rule it is nothing to ous that you grant us short respite during the extra session of hs most extraordinary Congress- tells us that Abolition memorials may be received in future after short respite of few weekss Is that the compromi proposed to us? And shall we be satisfied because told we may rest qulet for noment' What is the language it addresses to the South! "Judgment is gone against the Constitution, and Judgment of death is gone against you, but be perfectly quiet, you shall not be executed until next session; we going to give away the public lands, to establish Bank, and to extend the tariff, and