{"character_count": 3638, "word_count": 644, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9593999981880188], "ccnet_perplexity": [994.7000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THE WHIG PARrY.-We think the leaders of this heterogeneous party reckon without their host when they imagine that they can heal the wound n- aicted upon it's integrity by the distinguished veto o their chef It was a mortal blow, at vital part the pain may be assuaged and the danger procrasti- mated, but if there be much principle in the bank advocates as in John Tyler, ts'opponent, the breach is irreconciable and the dissolution of the great whg party near at hand. We regard the difficulty as simply this: the Clay wings will be contented with nothing short of a Bank-and. the President whigs will never give their consent to Bank.-We con- slider the efforts of Mir. Sergeant To patch up some plan that will suit the President certain prove abortive, MT. Tyler's objections to the Bank bill in his veto, the whole ground of opposition to bank, and the hopes hung by MT. Sergeant upon what he sad in favor of the exchange operations of the old Bank of the United States, are fallacous because Mir Tyler referred to them as arguments m support of his veto objections the bank bill and not, as is supposed, to intimate, that ,he wdid not reject bank bill framed in conformity with his req sonng. The oAly reasons given by the President for his veto are ih the following two entences:

 .:rThe power of Congress to create a National Bank to operate per SC the Union, his been question of dispute from the erigi" of our g enment It will suffice for nie 10 say, that my own opiniol has been niformls proclaimed to be against the ex- ercises of any such power by this government" Nothing can be more explicit. He denies the po,eer o Con gress 10 create Nationai Bank oe- rate per SC oier the Urion. The distinction attelap ed to be set up by Mr Sergeant and his coprojector of the 'sFiscaI Corporation, between bank to deal in exchange and bank to discount promissory notes is distinctions without difference. just as easy to lend money to politicians bill of exchange with an acceptor in other State, o his promis sory note with an indorser.

 "Aow the institution to deal in drafts and bills of exchange without restriction, says the New York Post, and Mir. Webster, when he wants money, has only to draw bl on somebody at Philadelphia or New York, instead of making his. promissory note payable at Washington, and the bank will give him the cash. It will be quite as convenient for the bank, and nearly 4ss convenient for Mir. Webster"

 To put another familiar case, Jas. w. Webb would find it just easy borrow his ss52 900 on bill as on a note.-To suppose. therefore. that Mr. Tyler is be juggled by such paltry rickery is to shut our eyes to pregnant example Of hls hrmness just fallen before us He will reject it with scorn, as he did MT, Clay's "compfomise" section in the late bank bill which he seemed to take special pains and delight inliearing to shreds. The President is ins"lted bysuch aproposition

 It seems, then ls be plain to us thai the Clay party',eil ge, no sort elaa National Bank. that will have power to1ifnd money notes or bills-nothing that will be able to make money plenty to-day and scarce to-morrow-nothing to operate upon the po- ltcs of the couRtry and the votes of the people with alternate biandishments and tightening of the Failing in this, upon T'ytet is the inevitable resut-war upon Tyler breaks up the party-and that falflls our prediction. Nothing prevent it. neither the eoquence of Webster in caucus, the moderation of Clay in council. house divided a.. gainst itself cannot stand-and one party cannot hold two such leaders as Clay and Tyler-the zenith and the nadir would sooner approximate:

 