{"character_count": 5118, "word_count": 824, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8565000295639038], "ccnet_perplexity": [1047.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 THE TwrNTY-FIRsr RuLE.--The Washington correspondent of the New York Herald, heads his letter announcing the exception of the 2lst rule in the rules adopted by the House of Representative "THE TRIUMPH OF THE ABoLITIoNIsT!" In this light il is universally regarded, both by the enemies and the friends of the south and the constitution We were ridiculed, lampooned and abused, for laying stress upon the subject of abolition during the Pres- dential campaign. Its dangers were pronounced - lusory, those who raised warning soice to the South, were called shumbugs and demagogues," in a word, those who portents of evil in the compo- siton of the Harrisburg Convention, in the close a- ance between nsrtbern whigg,sm and aboliiionism in all their votes whether in Congress the State Legislatures, and m every other sign of the times winch could enghten and alarm them upon this sub- ject, pronounced agiators and aarmists richly meriting the public contempt. Time has since pass ed, and what has happened! The first week of whig triumph in the House of Representatives, produces triumph to the abelitionists! 3 fHkAaa

 Our object present is to give the yeas and nays on the question. It came up amendment by Mr. Adams, to srcept the 2lst rule in the adoption of the old rules. fs # .5 4

 The amendment excepts the 2lst rule, which pro- hbits the agitation of the subject of slavery.

 The question on the amendment was then taken by yeas and nays, at the call of Mir, Sade as fol- lows:- ,s..f. Et aal eaa I eA tiapls G'5 ia's

 YEAs-Messrs. Adams, E. H. Allen, s. J. An drews, Aycrgg, Babcock, Baker, Barnard, Beeson, Birdseye, Blair, Boardnlan, Borden, lotts, Browne Brewster, Briggs, Brockway, Bronson, Chas. Brown, Jeremiah Brown, Burnell, Calhoun, Childs, Chitten- den, John c. Clark, Staley N. Clark, Clinton, Cow en, Cranston, Cushing, Richard G. Davis, pimock, Doig, Egbert, Everitt Ferris, Fessenden, Fillmore, John c. Floyd, Charles A. Floyd, Torrance, Foster, Gates, Giddings, Patrick G. Goode, Gordon, Greg, Gustine, Hall, Hallsted, Hastings, Henry, Howard, Hudson, Hunt, Ingersoll, Irwin, Irwin, James, An drew Kennedy, Lane, Lawrence, Linn, Littlefeld, Lowell, Robert Mcclellan, Mexican, Marchand, AL fred Marshall, Mathiot, Mattocks, Maxwell. May pard, Morgan, Morrow, Osborne, Parmenter, Par fridge, N. c. Pcndleton, Plulner, Ramsey, Benja- min Randall, Alexander Randall, Randolph, Ridg- way, Roosevelt, Russell, Saltonstall, Sanford, Ser geant, Simonton, Shade, Smith, Snyder, Stokey, Stratton, Stuart Richard w Thompson, Tilnghast, Poland, Tomlinson, Trumbull, Underwood, Van Bu- ren, Van Rensselaer,, Wallace, Thomas w. Will Hams, Winthrop, Yorke, Augustus Youug and John Young-I12. ...aI l5.' ,-4 .faI1J

 NAYs-Messr.. Afford, L. W. Andrews, Arnold, Arlington, Atherton, Barton, Bidlack, Boyd, A. V. Brown, M. Brown, Burke, Simpson H. Butler, Wm. Butler, w. O. Butler, G. w. Caldwell, P. c. Cald- well, J. Campbell, W. B. Campbell, T. J. Camp bell. Caruthers, Cary, Chapman, Clifford, Coles, Daniel, Garrett Davis, w. c. Dawson, J. B. paw- son, Dean. Deberry, Eastman, J. c. Edwards, Fos- ter, Gamble, Gentry, Gerry, Gilner, Goggin, w. O.. Goode, Graham, Greene, Habershan, Harris, Houck, Hays, Holmes, Hopkins, Hubbard, Hunter, Jack, w. c. Johnson, J. w. Jones, Isaac B. Jones, kem, Kennedy, King, A. Mcclellan, McKoy, Mallory, T. F. Marshall, $. Mason, J. T. Mason, Medill, Mer- riwether. Miller, Moore, Newhard, Nsbet, Oliver, Owsley, Pesrce, Pickens, Pope, Powell, Profht, Rayner, Reding, Rencher, Rhett, Riggs, Rodney, Rodgers, Saunders, Shaw, Sheppard, Sollers, Stan ley, Steenrod, Summers, Sumster, Taaferro, J. B, Thompson, Triplett, Turney, Ward, Warren, Wash ington, Watson, Westbrook, J. w. Williams, z. H.. Williams, J. L. Williams, Wise, Wood-l04.

 Mir. Ingsrsoll (dem.) of. Philadelphia, voted with the majority for the purpose of moving reconsdera ,ion, which he did the day following, accompanied with strong speech the southern side of the gues tion. In the course of his remarks, Mir. Ingersol contended that the true of all these abolition astatons might be traced to the interference Great Britain, and that the only way to remedy the evil would be for the south strike at that He coutended that the south had taken ground high enough in this matter, and that members from that uortion of the union, ought to assume bolder attitude. 'f sstaf s,a .s.t. s

 Afer abiding to the interference of England in re- la.ioa to the Amis,ad negroes. and the communca- ,ion by Mr. Fox of the Popes Bull against slavery to our government, Mr. l. said it would be right in re- urn for the applimer. iAslrsea Mt. sersssnA.a' remoustrate .gjth shel l3rishion tlhc;s of their .sai.. .ls.py irarsaaxa saattsif AZ s. 4 ss @ is Canada. .npm,l ssi, ,1s aIi v su" -"'. f~... ..s~sa< place. We have been not iltts am.1ssa al .Es l0- lowing remarks af sse cofresp0sae8 o' Aea' s'sfs ion Patriot:

 ..Many of Mir. Ingersoli's friends regret that he hos thus renewed an angry debate on this excfing G ,opic, by moving reconsideration oI me n Sc.e. - s r;sht Id repl, and thus much lime xil he xasledI