{"character_count": 1270, "word_count": 213, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9743000268936157], "ccnet_perplexity": [1213.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The objection we made to hlr. Webster in regard to the narrowness of his views statesman, is which has been entertained by the ablest men of the country. We have not leisure at this time to point to the public which provet, but cannot con- template his public life without reaching that concu- sion. The very of education which made him g-eat lawyer has unftted him to be great statesman

 DlnieI Webster is nnquestionably an eminent law yer but he has yet prove himsefa great statesman He possesses neither comprehensive practical views of msn nor that exAied perspicaci,y of intellect which ls the politician above local prejndices and ass ,ciations, comprehend at one glance the wants aal necessities of country vast as ours. He has not that conf Ience the public virtue and inteli- gaace which should be profoundly impressed on eve ry 4 n,rican statesman. Place him in the British .rlia n, where the provinces subordnate,and L,rl Brougian himself might succumb to hm.-Le- gidri,g for State he has superior, but the mos m Il he passes its boundaries, he loses his acknowl- elg,a powers. By constantly thinking there is no A ,rira beyond Massachusetts, he has dwarfed his

 aili as be almost unable to comprehend the ex- istsace of twenty-six independent sovereigntes,