Eraslns L. Snrlggs. delenlant.
{"character_count": 1363, "word_count": 258, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9531000256538391], "ccnet_perplexity": [1322.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Erastus L. Sprlggs, defendant.

 The bill in this case Is bll for diVorce,-lt sets forth that he complainant has faithfully discharged all her duties as married w0mani but that the de- lendant has neglected to provide any means for the s,lp,r. s .Le cpmpa and her children that he has failed to perform many oi his duties as husband and has done acts inconsistent with his duy tp the eompla nant--ln consideration nf winch prenses ihe Il prays for perpetual dissolution of tae bonds of marriage and for such other relief as couit of equi- ty can grant And now |, appearing to the satsiac- ton of the Register of the court of chaneery for the first district of the southern chancery dson of said state at Mobile that the defendant resides ont of the limits of the State of Ala anna he is order to ap' pear at the term of said court of chaneery Ia be held al Mob le, on the second Mo iday of November next, and answer or demur to the bill of colnplan and is further ordered that this order be published once week for five weeksin some newspap print ed and published in the city of Mobile and that q copy of the same be posted on the door of the court house o Mobile county, all within ten days rom thls date 9t8 rl4

 Witness, Malcolm J. McRle, Register of said

 chancery court, this the Huh day of October

 A. D. l94l. Attest, s oclll 57ta M J. NIcRAE. Register.