{"character_count": 2194, "word_count": 388, "ccnet_language_score": [0.972599983215332], "ccnet_perplexity": [852.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MINISTER TO EN6LAND.-The Boston Courier and other northern papers are very-yery lndIg nant at the rejection of Mr. Everett as Minister 10 England-they say he rejected on the ground of being an abolitionis and that if disqualification for office follows oppos ton slavery g tbe abstract it is time for northern states to follow southern exam pie, and calculate the value of the union Well, it would not be the first time they have calculated it., ay, and presented most extraordinary bill as their share, too They have generally to the conclu- sion that it was better to stay.

 But while objection has been made to Mir. Everett in connection with abolition, il has been made far as we have seen, fairly, He is simply accused of having descended from the position he had before maintained towards the south for the sake of gaining the abolition vote for Governor of Massachusetts, He succumbed to the abotionsts for the sake of of

 ce and we hold that to be very grave objection to his representing this country abroad. We do not believe him to be abolitionst-he is too sleek and dapper for fanatic of any But that is far from proving that he ought to be Minister to England.

 Mr. Everett is nice man, of scholarly tastes, mel ihuous speech and that harmony of ideas which de- pends on the aborIous p0lsh and premeditated con- eruty of well assorted negatives. But for of eager sight, of unyelding will and thorough business powers we are not to look to ile quondam Professor of Cambridge. And such a man we want noY to represent us in England. He ought also to be free from all suspicion of dabbling in aboltionism, for some of the worst questions we have to settle with that nation, touch the question of slavery. If Mir. Everett must have a mission, send him somewhere else-send him any whsre but to England.

 But really after the proofs Mir. Cay's man Charles in the House has given, it is all nonsense to talk of he Clay fartion rejecting any body for abolition. The democratic Senators may well have voted against gMr. Everett that ground, but f he had heen an Adams abolitionist, instead of Webster aRotion- jst, the Clay folks would not have quarelled wtb him. .v- CbariesteR Mercury.