{"character_count": 1744, "word_count": 314, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9894999861717224], "ccnet_perplexity": [900.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
which it is hardly to be expected her
friends will pay for her. Comment upon
such atrocities rs unnecessary"


Now we are opposed to the law, and
think it an unjust one, but we cannot re-
frain from expressing our unqualified dis
appreciation of any association who will
misrepresent facts as they have been mis-
represented n this instance, and we would
suggest to the above named association
the propriety of adhereing to candour and
truth in their statements, and their pre-
tentioEs to philanthrophy.


Here are the facts in the case the wo-
man was not the wife of Michael Kerr,
but was drunken prostitute, whom he
had taken up, and brought into this state,
from Delaware 10 avoid his lawful wife.
When she came here she was told the con-
sequence of her staying, and advised and
warned to leave the state, but refused to
do it; she was drunken and noisy, and
created great deal OF disturbance in the
street in which shelived, and her conduct
being observed by an officer she was ta-
ken, tihder the law in question, and put in


1; her fine of $40. was paid by the cili~


ms Of the town; she was liberated, and
idmonisbed again to 60 into Delaware.
and there remain; she went into that State,
but very soor returned, and was again
imprisoned. She was liberated by the
Court, not as is inlimated in the report, on
account of the uncons,itulionalily of the
act, but because of some inlormality in the
proceedings before the Orphans Court,
before committing her to jail These are
the simple facts of the case and may be
sufficient to cure the sympathy, excited
by the association in their version of the
case. But we do not wish to be thought,
to be defending the law in question, which
we believe to be sinexcusab,y harsh and
unjustifable.