s5,s0,7o2 6s

A5,50O, 7O2 bs VIM. LAWN, Cashier.
{"character_count": 1352, "word_count": 242, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9616000056266785], "ccnet_perplexity": [1195.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 i will he perceived tha, our account of inc notes discounted exceeds that of the cashier by ihe sum oi $2,5i5 97, while account of bills of exchange l short of his statement Si5, l4l 70; makiuga dii. ference oi what might he considered the available means oi the bank of Ss40,l Ill S2. Ky reference the reports ol inc torner commissioners it will be that discrepancy has existed in these two ac- counts for several years past. and confess our in- ability to throw any lieh, on the subject. lt sl also be perceived that c,rcuiation ac- does not correspond with the Cashiers sate- ment. The difference IS in part accounted Tor. as follows The circulation of the bank counted by the commissioners in 1859, was sealed up, but there no private seal used h, them we determined |" count it over. and doing so, fD,,l package tn be short $lOO, and another $ ,00O, making difference in the circulation on hand 900. We would remark here, that the money counted by the cumn,issiOners of last year, was put up in packages under private seal, and there being no appearance of their having been opened. the amounts were taken by the endorsement.

 CIRCULATION ACCOUNT. IL appears by the books of this in

 stitution, tl,e entire circulation is S2,299, 300 50 Amount now ia vault

 and m Teller's hands ,039 ,S64 50 Amount in tfansitu, 24l ,4l6 %

 -- l,2Sl ,3l0 50