CHANCERY SALES.

In Chancery-State of Alabama-Mobie County.

 Thompson Littell, complt.
{"character_count": 2584, "word_count": 467, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9603000283241272], "ccnet_perplexity": [905.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In Chancery-State of Alabama-Mobiie County.

 Thompson Littell, compt.

 379 622 vs.

 Jno. N Warren, Catharine Cheeseborough, Sarah M. Cheeseborough, Clara Warren, Elisha Cheese borough snd Sarah his wife and Warren J Hodge,

 defendants.

 PURSUANT to a decree rendered in this case at 1 the Springf Term, D 1859 of the court of chance " for he first district of the southern chancery dvi- sion of said state shall proceed sell on the first Monday in July next in front of the court house of Mobile county, and between the usual hours oi she riffs saes the following described property, to wit: All that certain tract piece, parcel or lot of land and premises, situate, lying and being m the city oi Mobile numbered lots three and four m square two hundred and thirty nine, according to the plan ofciy lots of the late Henry Toumin, deceased, on record in the Mobile county court, clerks office in book (A page three hundred aud fifty eight (35S) each of said lots having front of forty six feet on the west side of Conception street, with the number of feet in the rear-i.ot number three is bounded east by Conception street, south by line parallel with State street and distant one hundred feet thererom west by lot number sixteen, and north by said lot number four and has hundred and thirty four feet ten inches on It's south ne and hundred and thirty feet on It's north line. Lot number four is bounded east by Conception street. south by lot number three, and as one hundred and thirty five feet it's south line, and one hundred and thirty five feet two inches on i4 north line, and which said lots of land are in the city and county of Mobile and State of Alabama - Terms of sale cash. Attest,

 M. J. McRAE, Master in Chdncey.

 The above property sold under the aforesaid decree, on the first Monday in September A D 1889, when James E. Zuntz became the purchaser, and at the Spring Term, l540, of the chancery court of the first district of the Southern chancery diy- sion of this state at Mobile, the sale was confirmed, but afterwards appeal to the Supreme court of the State of Alabama, in the case of Thompson Littell vs. James F. Zuntz, the said decree confirming the sale made aforesaid, was by the said Supreme court at it's last January Term reversed and annued-and. .theeupon, the said court of chancery at Mobile, It's last May Term A D l34l, orerded and decreed, that the said premises above described be re-sod as under the former de- cree of sale rendered in the original suit of Thomp- son Lttell vs. Jno N. Warren, ct al.

 Attest M. J. McRAE,

 d 2. in Ina