{"character_count": 814, "word_count": 147, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9851999878883362], "ccnet_perplexity": [1424.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Senator Wright said, in his recent Sub.Treasurv speech, that no measure had been settled" Ly the Presidential election and he did not consider the rE- suit ct that election verdict againat the SubTrrasu. y.. Now we would ask, did nineteen states of Ihs Union vote against Mr. Van BuFcn because they ds. approved Of his public acts, did they reject him snirk his lip the twinkle Of his eye, or the hue of his whlskeTsH If their verdict has been pronOunced against the policy of Martin Van Buren, it is clear that tt has been pronounced against the Sub.rreaeu. ", tor the Globe O last Friday declares that the mea sure constitutes the basis O the policy Ot the ndm nlslFaliOn 1t Is novel doctrine to say, when pub. JIG man Is rejected and condemned by the people that his pUbllc acts remain uninlpeached

 N v YC,na.