{"character_count": 3240, "word_count": 540, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9124000072479248], "ccnet_perplexity": [1015.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
VIRGINiA.-The Federal party has saved its su- prcmacy in the Virginia Legislature by the skin of the teeh and rejoced (after their great fright) that it is The democracy of the Union have to be satisfied, with the energy, firm ness, and close adherence to principle, with which the republicans of Virginia have fought the late bat tle The triumph of the whigs, if it may be called so, is an empty one. They have, from the last &C., counts, majority of two each branch of the Leg slature, or four joint baot-but that majority is composed of such men Gov Bayly of Accomac, who is democratic in principle, and only whig by prejudice and association In Congress, the majori- ty of the delegation is thoroughly democratic in prn- ciple. The Richmond Enquirer classes them pro- perly in the following article

 The result of the election shows that the popular majority in the State is to its republican princi pies.

 From the Richmond Enquirer.

 CONGRESSIONAL RETURNs.-The Richmond Whig is exceedingly annoyed at the political nome- clature which we have introduced, viz ; of "State Rights Anti-Bank Republicans" and "Federal Wings" We think have adopted the natural classification of part es-and no member has right to complain of it, who recognizes the broad distinc- tion between strict and iatitudinous construction of the Constitution-and who admits that Bank of the U. s. is the great bone of contentious before the country. The Whig asks, whether our nomeclature "w seduce Gov. Gilmer or Doctor Mallory ?''- We are not cunning enough to seduce those gente- men, nor we absurd enough to make the attempt. We believe that Mir. Gmer will under no considera- tion vote for U. s. Bank-ditto Mir. Mallory-and ditto Mir. Hunter. Yesterdays mail brings US the following piece of evidence about Dr. Mallory which we hail with pleasure

 Prom the Old Dominion.

 No NATIONAL BAEk.-We are pleased to learn that Dr. Mallory made speech in opposition ts a National Bank, the morning of the election at Hampton. We also gratifed to know that one of the Delegates elect from Norfolk county, is opposed the establishment of National Bank on constitu- tonal grounds. We consider this question as one in- volving the dearest rights of freemen. The estab- shnen ofa Bank will be the end of popular Govern ment.'

 Whether it please, then, our conscientious neigh Dor, (who blows hot and cold about the National Bank, and who dodges the plan question which we put him, and who will cry up John Tyler to the skies for signing Bank bill, which this honest, honest lago knows to be contrary to the constitution of his country,) we care not. We please ourselves, and we consult the natural nomenclature of the tmes by re-adopting the following classification State Rights Anti-Bank Federal Wings.

 Republicans.

 Francis Mallory. Wm L. Goggin, George B, Cary, John Taaferro, John w. Jones, John M. Bolts, Wm. o. Goode, Cuthberl Powell, Edward w. Hubbard, Richard W. Barton, Walter Coles, Alexander H. H. Stuart, Robt. M. T. Hunter, George W. Sunmers-7. Thomas W. Gilmer,

 Linn Banks,

 w A Harris,

 George W. Hopkins,

 Samuel L. Hays,

 Lewis Steenrod-I3.

 (HENRY A. WISE,) GA Bank man, only under certain qualifcatiohs- Anti Distribution, Anti-Tarh, &c.)