Eras,us L. spfiggs, defendant.
{"character_count": 1319, "word_count": 246, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9193000197410583], "ccnet_perplexity": [1778.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The bill in this case is bill for diyorce;-it sets forth that the complainant has falhnllY dlachaTRed all her duties as married women but that tae de- feniant has neglected 10 provide any means Tor the support of the compla nani and hef children that he asfacd to perform lnany of his duties as husband and has done acts inconsistent with his duty to the eoinpla nantin consideration of winch premises the J prays for perpetual dissolution of the bonds oi marriage and for such other relief as a court of equt " can grant. nov appearing to the satisfae- lion of the Register of the cri 9f chsncery for the first district oi the southern chancery dyisqn of seid saie ai Mobile that the defendant resides ont of the limits of tbe State of Ala -ama he Is order to ap- et ihrp ieTn of sald court of chancery to be held at Mobile, on the second Mondsy qf November next, and answer delnur otbe bill of conplapls and il is further ordered that this order be published onoe week for five weeks in some newspap rprlnt. cd and published ir ihe ely of Mobile, and that a copy o ilc same be ppsled an tie doqF ofthe capt house of Mobile aop9iy, all within len days ffna ihis date.

 Witness, Malcolm J. McRae Register of said

 ehancerv court, this the llth day of October,

 A, D, lS4l. Attest,

 octll 57tR M. J, McRAE. Register.