{"character_count": 1155, "word_count": 208, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9779999852180481], "ccnet_perplexity": [1869.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Washington, Jan. 2.--I have not written

 you several days past, because there has noih-

 ing occurred of interest that is not to be found

 in the Washington papers. Hitherto have

 not considered the movements of the Jack

 son party in favor of MT. Hugh l.. White of Tennessee, as entitled th much notice. Of late, however, more importance is being as- tached to Mr. w. as candidate. It is now

 said confidently, that he Is more likely than Mir. Van Buren. tn As the rallying point ofthe party. It is said that the delegations of Ten nessee and Alabama, have had two rpestings. at which the claims of Mir. White have been considered. and that the intention has been disclosed, that he ought to be the candidate instead ofa Mir. Van Buren. It is reported that the meeting resulted iD formal letter to Mr. White. assuring him that if he would con- sent to he candidate. that .sr might not only rely on the support Of Alabama and Tennes- see, hut on Mississippk and that he would probably also have the support Of most of the So0lherR end South Western States.-

 Mir. White. IL Is now said, promptly returned fDr snswer. shat as, be had never sought so