{"character_count": 1883, "word_count": 321, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9733999967575073], "ccnet_perplexity": [2279.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
10 the King, that the difference might be settled for 12,000,o0o francs and it is be- lIeved that copy of this dispatch, being communicated to several influential mem- bers of the Centre by the friends of M. Ser rurler contributed in no small degree to the rejection of the demand of 25. 1000. If. From this moment the disgrace of the French Minister to the U. $. was resoly- cd or; b;,:t it could fiott bbe decided upon. for fear of divulging the motives. We have other reasons than any thing which appears in the French papers, for believing that the statement of the Tribune is sub stantially correct. M. Serrurier has had some opportunity of mistrusting the perfect accuracy of the opinion he IS said to have heretofore held and expressed, that the V4lnelqcan GogelWment could not be kicked into lcar aoith France, and his recal will probably be understood us an intimation that his Government now somewhat doubts the accuracy of his former communiea- tions.

 That the recal of M. Serurier is a less belligerent measure than was at first suppo- sed, seems to De further established by the positive assertion that MT. Livingston had no intention of leaving Paris. Galignani's Messenger of the 18th ultimo says, sWe are enabled to contradict. in the most posi- tive manner, the statements in several of our contemporaries, that preparations arc making at the Hotel of the American Elm bassy for the departure of MT. Livingston, and that his Excellency was to leave Paris this afternoon. These accounts are who'll y destitute of truth, as we have reason to know, that notwithstanding the notification of the Montieur, Mir. Livingston has no in- ton of demanding his passport"

 We subjoin such extracts as are of suffi- cient importance 10 compensate for the space they occupy.

 Mir. Livingston had an audience of the King on the l4th instant (after the message had reached Paris.