From the Louisville Journal.
{"character_count": 1807, "word_count": 302, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9674000144004822], "ccnet_perplexity": [1859.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Hon. SAMUEL H. JENKs, who was formerly leading Jackson man and who is now distinguished member of the Massa i. chusetts Senate and the Editor of the Nan- tucket Enquirer, believes, that Mr. Van Buren procured the nomination of Col. Johnson upon his ticket, in order, that he himself might the better succeed by way of contrast. The New York magician un- Cloubtedly acted with this view. He knew, that the more scrupulous and squeamish of the administration party would be able to satisfy or at least 10 console ther own consciences and to impress the world with an idea of their candor and honesty in their support ofhm, by rejecting his co-nominee, for immortality of private character and de- stituton of political principle.

 Mr. Jenks justly says, that this attempt to make another's failings a stepping-stone to power IS precisely in keeping with the general character of Mir. Van Buren, whom he denominates "a sly, dissembling, hollow hearted, cold, selfish, hypocritical, double dealing, housing, political knave." Mir. J. considers the Tecumseh killer, with all his failings, better man than Van Buren, and puts the public in possession of the following historical scrap from the ColonePs own mouth:

 "What if Johnson did not kill Tecumseh and he told me with his own lips al Washington five years ago, that the honor, if 1t be one, could not possibly belong to him-at the same time relating circum- stances that completely overthrow the sup position-still he was man of courage an attribute of which Van Buren possesses not a particle. What if he did mol write the Sunday Mail eport--and the Report against Imprisonment for Debt--exploits which he himself would in moment dis claim, if qucstonedi and the merit of which. none who know him intimately. or ever heard hitn speak, would undertake