{"character_count": 1699, "word_count": 308, "ccnet_language_score": [0.977400004863739], "ccnet_perplexity": [1396.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The following sentences occur in an artl- ticle in the last Gazette, concerning State Government:-

 stNe possess ample resources #wherewith 10 defray the additional expense of State Government, without resort to an increase Of our taxes, and.... our resources as well as our population are rapidly increasing. This can be so easily demonstrated that we ean- not see with what consistency some of those who were so clamorous for a State Government three CT four years ago, (when We were opposed 10 1t on the ground that We possessed neither the population or re- sources to justify it, arc now opposed to the measure.'

 Will the Gazette be good enough to put its finger on the men of whom it speaksl That the Advocate-its former or present Editor or the men-any of them-who have stood by 1t in peril-are now opposed to State Govern ment, is not true. We have declared often and openly, that we were as much in favor of 1t as ever-and have only protested against the impudent attempts ofCol. serier and the Gazette, toelaim the whole credit of defend- ing State Government. Our opinion is the same as that which the Gazette expresses The Advocate led the van n defence of State Goyernment-and in the van 1t IS yet to be found. We are not in the habit Of casting away our opinions because Seyier comes over to us. Although generally on the weak side, we are not so much in love with minority as always to choose the losing side, If any men who formerly were "clamoroes for a State Government, are now opposed to it, 5 let the Gazette name them. 1.-the Gazette has seen the s'error of it's ways" let it be con, gent with being at length in the rght-but let it not assail those who have always been so.