{"character_count": 1774, "word_count": 325, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9842000007629395], "ccnet_perplexity": [2018.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 Mr. Adams "A writer in the Enquirer of the 18th iust who subscribes himself a Whig, finds it " difficult to perceive how John M. HoIley. Esq., can with propriety appear before the public on tbe subject of the use to the approaching election" He further states, that cit has never been the practice in Connecticut for candidate to announce his acceptance of a nOminati0n - and that there is no adequate reason why Mr. Holley should be called upon to communicate his views to the electors The author of the call on Mr. H. was not alone in his opinion respecting the propriety of that cali-rer was that opinion confined to the town from which that com. munieation was dated. Mr. HOlley's ease is pec0liar one. Had he been nenainated but by one Conventmn; or, but for one office by both CoOv entiOns, it is not probable that he would have been called upon either to accept or decline. 1t Is not only true that he was nominated as Candidate fer the office of Lieut.. Governor aa MiddieiOwn and aiso for that of Member of Congress, at New Haven 1; but. sir. it is equally true that his name has been retained on bsih Tickets to this day. According to the doctrine of the above men, toned writer, we are to infer that Mr. Holley accepts both. And. if the Van Buren Con- vention had thought proper to nominate him as a candidate fer the office of Governor, or Secretary. he might have accepted that als6, in the same sileat manner. And this would be deiicacys

 But. sir. tt is subject "f rejoicing that Mr. HOlleys believing the cause of his coontry par amount to that of party mer~ly, has made known his views to the public. And we trust that we shall have his influence and exertions to aid us in our great and glorious cause.

 PR0 BoNo PUBLlco.

 Salisbury. Marck aSd, 1885.