{"character_count": 1472, "word_count": 268, "ccnet_language_score": [0.960099995136261], "ccnet_perplexity": [2184.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Il will not do. 1fr. Van Buren Is ad- mitted to have been a restrctionist in 1920. He does not pretend that his opin- ions have undergone any change on this point, and to vote for hlm, would be a surrender of tho vital principle on which the rights and interest of the South depend.

 The other points discussed by Iir. But Ter, are Mr. Van Buren's vote on the Cum berland Road; his vote for the tariff of 1928, and the Bank. For his vote to erect tolI-gates, Mr. Butler pleads youth and want of ideration--Good! For his vote in favor of the tariff of 1928, he pleads the popular opinion in New York, and the instructions got up by Mir. Van Buren's partizans, of whom Mr. Butler was one; and as 10 the Bank, he uses the common slang. The intelligent reader cannot fail to perceive h this letter, the strong proofs that Mir. Van Buren consid- CTS his case desperate. He is himself eoseted with the Attorney general; he gives out, through the Richmond Enquirer, weeks in advance, the fact that the letter is in preparation, and just on the eye of the elections 1t Is sent forth. as last despa- rate effort, to break the force of public opinion in Virginia. And will Virginia be duped by such an artifce Or will not her gallant sons, mindful of the pride and character of their noble ancestors, rally to the polls and rebll!e, in the language of in- suited liberty, this daring interference Of an officer of the Federal Government in her local elections.--f0titicaI Register.