From the Globe of June 23d.
{"character_count": 2519, "word_count": 435, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9890999794006348], "ccnet_perplexity": [2153.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The gentlemen implicated in MT Ingham s letter which we insert, have furnished us with the call made upon them by the President, and the responses made by each of them. It is strange that MT Ingham should charge men who have borne pure and unsullied characters through life with "lying in wait to assassinate him.; that he should, by direct communi- cation, Call upon the President to interpose his authority upon the occasion, and then leave the city himself before the information he gave could reach the Chief Magistrate, to whom he appealed to redress the imputed wrongs. MT Ingham was himself the only accuser and witness to whom the President could refer, to make good the charges against the public officers; and it was very extraor- dinary that he should make an investigation necessary, and abandon the city before the

 individuals charged could have an opportuni- ty of convincing him, by proving the real state his suspicious.

 But was it respectful to the President to make allegations which, if true, involved the dismisscn of several of the prominent officers in the Department, without. enabling him to ascertain the facts on which it was necessary topredicate his conduct? Mir Ingham knew, from the course held by the President to- WardS the omCerS enSaSeu III the dndir oi honor in Pennsylvania, that he would not tol- crate violence on the part of those connected with the Government over which he presided, and that he would feel himself bound to pros ecute all investigation into the charge made by him. MT Ingham was apprized that Ma icr Eaton had ceased to act as public officer, on the day that he demanded personal satis- faction for the insults with which he pursued him. The motive of the attempt made by MT Ingham to duplicate several prominent officers of the Government, as conspiring to assassinate him, is certainly rendered ques- tionable by the peculiar circumstances, and by the manner in which it is done. If MT Ingham had reason to believe that he could substantiate an offence of so aggravated character on those criminated by him, was it not his duty to have remained and to have confronted the accused9 If he had no ground to wake such accusation, what apology will he offer to the public for directing, like the flying Parthian, poisoned arrow at the in- disiduals who had never injured or intended toiniure him, and who it is evident he feared toencounter face to face, and wait an investi- gation

 NoTE.-Mr Ingham left the city at 4 o'clock, A. M. The letter was received by