THE TNTELLIG ENCER.

SATURDAY, JULY 1G, 1ss1.
{"character_count": 1992, "word_count": 336, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9800000190734863], "ccnet_perplexity": [1856.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Last week we repubshed the correspondence of Messrs Eaton and Ingham without comment, not having time then to speak of the affair. We think MT Eaton commenced the correspondence unadvis- edly, or at least without mature delberation; and it

 to be regretted, after it had taken place, that had not been concealed from the public eye. However charitable might be disposed to view the motives which induced Mir Eaton to open the correspond ence, cannot but view with the most decided dis appreciation his wanton attack on Mrs Ingham; and we will not attempt to disguise the fact, that upon reading the charge our indignation strongly ex- cited, and this indignation was increased tenfoId when we were informed by gentleman who is in- timately acquainted with Mrs l, that she has always sustained reputation above suspicion, and posses ses in high degree all those amiable qualities whclr render the female character lovely. This correspon- dence is eagerly seized upon by the opposition, and brought forward to confirm the statements made by Duff Green and the Washington Correspondent of the New-York Journal of Commerce, that the dis solution of the Cabinet was caused by disagree ment between the families of the heads of depart ments, rather account of the Presidents trying to force them to visit Mrs Eaton Acting upon these premises, they have taken the greatest latitude in abusing our worthy Chief Magistrate. In this, however as in all their previous attempts to attach odum to hs name, and 10 question the purity of his intentions, they have acted rather precipltately Tn their condemnation. To give these charges the coloring of truth, the recreant Telegraph quoted on all occasions, and received good authority by editors who few months ago, would not have believ ed Duff on 0ath. For ourselves must see bet ter evidence than has yet been adduced, before we can believe that the President has meddled in the Family Jars" in any way so as to affect the har- mony of the late Cabinet.