From the London Times.
{"character_count": 2723, "word_count": 457, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9696000218391418], "ccnet_perplexity": [1988.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
1he Late American Cabinet.-There has been a great deal of speculation in the English, and great lack of information in the American newspapers on the cause of the sudden dissolution of the late Jack son Cabinet No conspiracy has been discovered to burn the Capital or to blow up the Unon in which the President and his official helpers could take sides mo new expedition had been planned or projected against the Indian trbes in which the conscience or humanity of the Ministers could lead them to dissent from their Chief-and neither the abolition nor the increase of the tariff duties on foreign manufactures had been brought forward as bone of contention The twenty-and-odd States of the Confectionery re- posed in perfect safety under the Jackson sceptre and no adventurous Aaron Burr had risen to divide them by attempting to usurp the honors of kngshp The different Ministers in the friendly letters of signation to the President beginning My dear Sir" never hint at any grave question of foreign or domes tic politics which could separate them from each other or from an indulgent leader.

 What then, could he the of their precipitate dissolution2 That cause as now explained affords curious illustration of American manners and shows that our republican brethren west of the At antic are not exempt from those private influences in the management of their public affairs, which in their moods they ascribe exclusively to the old courts of Europe. 4 ,cOmanicas the cause of the 1rojan ,car, and the slighted pretensons of min isters wife occasioned the overthrow of President Jackson's Cabinet.

 "What dire offence from tri6ing causes spring.

 What mighty rise from little thiugs"

 It would appear that for some reason or other, (no which we forbear to nquire,) the lady sent mot to Troy, but-to Coventry, by her fair quas in the official circle of Washington and that, being supported by her husband as he was in duty bound, she formed faction against her rivals. The President, to show his impsrality, frequented her parties, well as those of the other ministerial danes, and thus added jealousy to dislike. At last the ladies contrived to embroi matters so much and to excite so many misunderstanding between their that no business could be done, and the President, in his continued impartiality obliged to dismiss the whole batch.

 We have forgotten the names of his new Minis ters, but suppose that in their selection he must have taken security against the occurrence of sim lar catastrophe by choosing bachelors, or that he must have written the presidential palace of the rules of the King of Navarro, in Love's Labor Lost-"1tem, That no woman come within mile ofmy court, on pain of losing her tongus.'