{"character_count": 1773, "word_count": 306, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9685999751091003], "ccnet_perplexity": [1761.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We have chosen to give the whole of the above

 nsructing letter in explanation of the motives which first dictated it, and the present application of that part bearing the Federal Judiciary Here is pre- sented of the greatest offences known to the laws ofthe and and yet under forms and technicates the Chief Justice contrived to place the notorious offend

 CT out of harms way; and in defiance of proof and the common sense cf he nation Aaron Burr escaped all punishment except the condemnation of the peo- pie. Mir Lewis, who is now candidate for Con- gress in the southern district of the Stae has been reproached for his vote at the last session to repeal the 25th section of the Judiciary act, which would put ''curb in the mouth and hook in the nose of the great Federal Leviathan," and by men too, who may be very honest in their belief that independent judges are necessary 10 the existence of free peo- pie. The publisher of the Mobile Register seems to be more alarmed at this vote than any others, and that "no party rage ever before inspired any of its votaries with spirit of innovation sufficiently daring to invade the hallowed precincts" and that this clause is the connecting link that binds together the several States We contend that the section in question is not the which binds ogetherthe afec. tons of the American people, and that in its exercise by aco-ordinae branch of the government much mis- chief be done by perverted interpretation of the article itself, whenever it's incorrigble expounders contemplate some daring innovation. For justif- cation of his vote, MT Lewis must rest his trial upon the judgement of his countrymen, whose necessities compel them to be eternouy uigilant, and to repel aggression from whatever quarter it may come.