{"character_count": 1607, "word_count": 288, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9763000011444092], "ccnet_perplexity": [2083.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
A London Correspondent of the New York Courier and Enquirer, states that tie MING oi ENGLAND ilas been cut by the Nobility in a manner, of which the people on this side of the atlan- tic can form no idea. 1t is added. ''that the King was never tayorite with the Nobility; his frank, blunt manner corresponding but httle with the polished and ultra refined tone in troduced into society by his late bro ther." Now we think the exchange has been good one. The late Klng was most expensive in his tastes up to the moment of his demise. His architectu- ral projects, as related to the royal resi- denee alone, cost the British nation thousands, we had almost said. millions of pounds.

 He had rather too much virtue for q period of economy. That lie was d nut iiihcieht patron of the Arts, none will deny. But taste for pictures and stat ures, and the luxurious embellishments oi Courts, which minister to the pleas ufes oi the imagination, form no equiy- oscnt for the denial of substantial popu- lar privileges. For people to be re- minded that their monarch is the best bred man in the world, and that he is tlte very mirror in which are cencentrat- ed and reflected the polished graces of court, was very we'll for the era that iust preceded the French revolution. But now, other qualities arein request. lrner tone of thinking and acting, if [hls should be even accompanied bs some biuntiiess Of manner, is called for from those kings who wish to be en. Lhroned in the affections of their s,,b. |ects, and not merely ambitious of tbf honors of courtly refinement. We. however, see no abatement, judging

 