{"character_count": 1070, "word_count": 183, "ccnet_language_score": [0.96670001745224], "ccnet_perplexity": [1823.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We are surprised to see the Southern Advocate express itself with much severity upon tile vote given by MEJAcKsos upon the Supreme Court ques- tion. If the editor of that paper will but read the debates on that subject, which have appeared in the Intelligencer, is believed he will withdraw some of the offensive imputatons which seemingly justify the opinions he has formed 5fthat gentleman To the voice of the people of Alabama, when can didly expressed on any subject, we bound to be- lieve that MT JACKSON will never turn deaf ear. But when some of the trans-mountain counties have already expressed themselves in opposition to se- parate Supreme Court, it cannot be justly inferred that he set aside their will in voting as be did when the bill rejected. We have expressed ourselves in favor of separate Supreme court; but if the time has not yet arrived when others think expedient to establish one it is for suspecting the mo- tives of those whom we delegate to decide that point

 BoTH SIDEs.-A man in Philadelphia adyertises Antt Masonic and Chyisfiau Almanacka