s. D. INGHAM, Esq.
{"character_count": 973, "word_count": 163, "ccnet_language_score": [0.953499972820282], "ccnet_perplexity": [2208.60009765625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The following paragraphs from the Globe of the 22d ult in reply to the Telegraph of the preceding evening, demand place in our columns:

 "A correspondence, of private nature, between Messrs Eaton and Ingham, appears in the Telegraph of last evening. It is to be regretted that crcum- stances sometimes occur in the private relations of life which make such appeals M necessary The mer- ture, we shall leave to the decision of the public, without any comment from

 "We are, however. requested to state that the &C., count given in the Telegraph of collection of per- sons in the Treasury Department. with the view of making personal attack on Mir Ingham, is utterly destitute of foundation.

 "We arefurther requested to state, that Major Ea- ton did oihom any attendant tohatercr seek meeting with Nj, Ingham, having first sent him word of his intenti,n in which he failed, simply because the obieo could not be effected without violating the sanctity of private dwelling