 From the Washington Globe.
{"character_count": 1239, "word_count": 211, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9704999923706055], "ccnet_perplexity": [1934.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We present to our readers the speech of Mir Madi- son, delivered against the Bank of the United States in 1791. Mir Madison was then fresh from the Con- venton which formed the Constitution and he then emphatcally the representative of those prnci- pies, which the Republican party had settled upon rule of construction essential to its preservation. Has the Constitution changed since that day7 Have the rulers of interpretation luminousy presented by Mir Madison. as forming the articles of the Re- publican faith, been abandoned by the party? No. The Constitution and the doctrines which the de- mocratic party would maintainit remain unchanged. The same grounds assumed by Mir Madison in op- posing the Bank in 1791, vctoriously reasscrt- ed by the Republican party, and Mir Clay as it's lea der, in opposition to the Bank charter in 16ll. The war came, and the disorganization produced by it, gave birth to the Bank under the pretence of neces- sity. Mir Madison and Mir Clay changed their faith upon the plea of necessity. Mir Jefferson and Gene ral Jackson adhered to the Constitution and the ori- gina principles upon which they were opposed to the Bank in l79I and 1611, and at the period of the establishment of the present Bank.