{"character_count": 1413, "word_count": 254, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9448999762535095], "ccnet_perplexity": [1819.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
! rom the 1NatIOnai IntelllgenCer- DECISION Or THE SUPREME COURT.

 Georgia end the Chcrokees The Stu preme Court of the United States ter ,nnated its usual session on the 18th March.

 Among t!!iies the s;ll eeeisiofis pronounced pre- yious to the adjournment, was one upon the application, oa the part of the Che rokee Nation, for an injunction to stay certain proceedings of the State of Georgia. The decision of the Court was an unequiyocai denial of the ipjunc- toa.

 The opinion of the Court was read by Chief Justice Marshall, and is there fore to be presumed to be from his lu- mlnous mind and pen. We have not been able to obtain 1t for publication, aFxlously as we desired to do so. We heard 1t read, however, and shall ven ture so far to report the grounds of it. as to slate, that the Court disclaims juTis- dlction of the case, on the ground that the Cherokee nation is not a foreign Ila- ton, in the sense of the Constitution.- iisese indian nations, it is in the opifl- ron of 9 majority of the Court, arc not soverelgns, independent of hesovereign- ' of the United States, but domestic oePendent nations, ina state of spupil- age to the United States, or in a rela- uon corresponding to that which wards lave to their guardians. The Supreme court, therefore, cannot take cognizance 2 cases to which it is sought to make toem parties as nations. With respect s9 ' rights of the Cherokees, however,