REPLY

M n .s,,1vo,a,, 1s,h T.,. 1921
{"character_count": 913, "word_count": 173, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9577000141143799], "ccnet_perplexity": [1583.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
WAsHINoToN, 18th June, 1851. Sir: have not been able to ascertain, from your note of last evening, whether is the publication erred to byyou, the act stated in the Telegraph, which you desire to know whether have sanctioned or will disayow. If it be the first you demand it is too absurd to merit answer If it be the last you may find authority for the same fact in Phiadel- phiA paper, about the first of April last which is deemed to be quite as friendly to you as the Tele- graph may be to me. When you have settled such accounts with your particular friends it will be time enough to make demands of others. In the mean me take the occasion to say, that you must be not little deranged to imagine that any clustering of yours could induce to dsavow what all the in- habants of the city know, and perhaps hafthe peo- pie of the United State believe to be true

 am sir, respectfully yours, dkc.

 s. D. INGHAM.