{"character_count": 1247, "word_count": 225, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9682000279426575], "ccnet_perplexity": [1771.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Judge Clays Speeeh.-We ask the attention of ou readers to the speech of the Hon. CLEMENT C. CHA, which will be found on the first page ofthis paper, public dinner given on the 9th nlt at Hickman, Spring, m Lawrence county, to him and the Hon JOHN MCKINLEY. That part oft to which we wish to direct the readers particular attention is his yin dcation of his vote upon the rejection of the bill to repeal the 25th Section of the Judiciary Act. We doubt not that every reasonable man will be fully sa tsfied with this explanation. Inquiry cannot njure the cause of truth-but may promote it. and although we are decidedly opposed to repeal of that section do not think that the law itself too sacred to be examined or its provisions too perfect to be nvesti- gated. Judge Clays exertions in behalf of the land debtors, an explanation of which forms the residue of the address, are too well known and appreciated by the people to need comment from us.-Soathcri Advocate.

 We give to our readers to-day speech delivered by the Hon. C. c. CLAY, at Hickman's Spring. We think his explanation of his vote on the. bill to repeal the 25th Section of the Judiciary Act of 17S9 will satisfy those who seem anxious "to find or forge q lault."-HuntSrWe Democrat