{"character_count": 1484, "word_count": 275, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9692000150680542], "ccnet_perplexity": [2177.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The editor of the Mobile Register is wrong in SUD- posing that we invoke controversy with him on the merits of repeating the 25th section of the Judi clary Act To prolong the clamor at this time, would in our humble opinion, serve no other purpose than to work the poor old weather beaten hulk the constitution still farther from the shore In decd Ing how we were to act on question of such m D. nltude we preferred few weeks past to give the words of that illustrous statesman. whose voice is no more heard in the council house. but whose opn- Ions will continue to direct the wandering politician as dangers thicken and foes draw nigh So much has already been written and spoken on the subject that but few readers can be prevailed on to pursue ii any farther. Nor do we except to the sincerity with which the Register takes different side from our. selves on this question: but to :he perious situation in which the MAGNA CHARTA would be left Gas if is con- tended) by the repeal of that individual section In remarling upon the honest fears of the Register or the 25th section by no means our intention to attribute frenzy personal dislike as the rule of ac. ton in the editor. We concur entirely in the truth ofhs motto, 'that the price ofIiberty is eternal ve

 lance, and only dieras to the pointwhere the danger lies. Let the people now decide, they have alrea dy heard as much as they can rccoect of both sides and in their verdict will not be unmIndfu of theii own security.