{"character_count": 862, "word_count": 156, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9758999943733215], "ccnet_perplexity": [1537.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In this case, the Bank elected three mem bers of the Kentucky legislature, making a difference of six votes in the strength of par ties in that body. How many more were elect cd in other counties by it's money and influ- cnce, we have no means of ascertaining; but it's managers had the same motives to stimu- late them at Lexington and throughout the State. With the merits of that controvers' we have nothing to do. Our only object is t' shew, by the most direct evidence, that the Bank of the United States has interfered il political contests and State elections. The Congress df the United States may possess themselves of all the details of this case, they choose to institute an inquiry.

 Is it safe for the State to tolerate a comb nation of monied men who resort to sucl means to control their governments whicl they will not pay cent to support?-GIo6"