{"character_count": 1848, "word_count": 330, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9682000279426575], "ccnet_perplexity": [2027.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Loss to the United States, 95,574

 Disadvantageous this partnership must be to the United States in moned point of view there is far more grave and serious aspect under which to view it. It is the political aspect resulting from the union between the Bank and the government This union has been tried in England and has been found there to be just disastrous conjunction the un- ion of church and state. It Is the conjunction of LENDER and BORROWER; and the holy writ has told which of these catagories will be master of the other But suppose they agree to drop rivalry, and unite their resources. Suppose they combine, and make apuah for political power: how great is the mis- chief which they may not accomplish! But, on this head, wish to use the language of one of the bright est patriots of Great Britan one who has shown himself in these modern days to be the worthy of those old iron barons whose patriotism manded the unpurchasable eulogium of the elder PITr. l speak of Sir WILLIAM PULrENY, and his speech against the Bank of England. 1797

 THE sPEECH-ExTRAcT.

 "I have said enough to shew, that gorernment has been rendered dependent on the Bank and more par tculary so, in the time of ,oar; and though the Bank has not yet fallen into the hands of ambitions men, yet it isevident that it might in ssh hands, assume

 po,cer sufficient to control and 0eer a,cc not only the ministers, but king, lords, and commons. ... As the Bank has thus become dangerous to gorernnenf, it might, on the other hand, by uniting with an aS- bilious minister, become the rneans of establishing fourth estate sufficient to involve this nation in ire irritable slarery and ought therefore, to be dreaded as much as certain East India Bill was justly dread ed at period not very remote. l will not say that the present minister, (the younger Pitt by endas-