{"character_count": 1344, "word_count": 226, "ccnet_language_score": [0.960099995136261], "ccnet_perplexity": [1930.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In the editorial controversy between our brethren at Huntsville, which has been same- times more bitter than would seem 10 impar- tlal observes to be necessary or expedient, We perceive that one of them has recently re- tered to casual remark said to have been made by the other in private conversatien.- Now, without intending to interfere with the,r disputes, or to take part with either against the ether, we beg leave respectfully tn sug- gest, that the most improved modern tactics ct editorial warfare regard as sacred and in- vlolable the private intercourse of the ndi- Vidnal, and confne the measures of hostility to the hNld of public and official action. IL is the paper and not the man, that is considered as assail4be. A generous and magnanmou, toe should scon to fullow his adversary into the retirement of personal intercourse, or to

 ntr' de into the sanctity of private friendly converse. Such attacks lead to the necessa- ry lntroducton--by way of explanation and dcfcnce-of facts and circumstances never in- tended, and often very improper, to be pre- scented befo e the public eye An editor s,ne

 ly has enough to do in guarding and watching hls editorial Course. Let him at least have the privilege of other citizens of enjoying, in security and peace, his private. intercourse with hs family and friends. s.-.Nat Banner.