{"character_count": 1589, "word_count": 278, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9460999965667725], "ccnet_perplexity": [2274.89990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
NuliifcatiOn. doctrince is now in fair way of being tested, in South Carolina. A gentleman of Charleston has actually refused to pay a Custom House Bond for the express purpose of bringing the question of the Constitutionality of the Tariff Laws before judicial trbunal but behold, the District Attorney of the United States "being thoroughly sa- tisfed cf the mnconstitutionaly of the Tarif" RE- FUSED TO INSTITUTE A SUIT ON THE BoNJ. It is ru- mored that the Attorney, MT Frost, has resigned i; but certain it is that if he has not he will be remov- ed by the President. His will be obliged immediately to bring suit and then we suppose the question will be tried. But how tried? Why, be- fore Judge Johnson, of the U. s. Supreme Court who is well known, is dametrically opposed to the doctrine of the Nullifers and will give judgement in favor of the United States. An appeal to the Su- pleme Court will not change the result. Under any circumstances the bond must be collected; and should resistance to the laws be attempted it will be put down foreiby if necessary. But we do hope that things will not be carried to such disastrous length.

 In the meantime, the Nuifers of Charleston are

 likely to defy Mir Frost. Besides the praises of the Mercury, they have inscribed his upon the wall of the Pavilion in which recent splendid Fete was held, as "the Habersham of South Carolina;'' and we suppose his sacrifice of office and emoument" will not be forgotten until the word Modification shall have become bye-word and reproach where it is now so highly honored.-FdyetteoiHe Obscrrer