{"newspaper_name": "The Wilmingtonian, and Delaware advertiser.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 636, "word_count": 119, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9721999764442444], "ccnet_perplexity": [1751.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In tho case of Mackic, Milne & Co, a
gainst VIM. Cairns and others, decided on
the 30th ult. in the Court Of Errors Of the
state of New York, it has been established,
as the law Of that state, that IN assignment
made by an insoivcnt debtor, in trust for the
benefit of creditors, ifit rc$eruea for his own
use any part Of the property conveyed, is
void as to dgmcnt-creditors not asserting 20
it /; and that it is void not mercy With regard
to the portion reserved. but wholly and en-
tirely. This decision overturns former
practice, which Of course ilso was, until this
decision, the general impression as to what
was law in such case.