{"newspaper_name": "The Wilmingtonian, and Delaware advertiser.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 647, "word_count": 110, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9853000044822693], "ccnet_perplexity": [1994.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
On the 5th May, in the House of Commons
a petition was presented complaining of III.
facetious Irish judge, Lord Norbury, as in.
competent on the bench. The petition was
frsm Daniel O'Connell, Barrister Of Dublin
MIR. O'Conncll represented that, John
Nor5ury was so deaf that it required
great efforts to make him hear; that he was
troubled with lethargic stupor that he had
been sound asleep during important trials;
and that the petitioner was ready to prov.
these facts at the bar--but that he would
withdraw complaint if any Irish judge de.
clared on his conscience that he thought
Lord Norbury competent to try questions Of
property and life.