{"character_count": 596, "word_count": 99, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9715999960899353], "ccnet_perplexity": [1988.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
due. His learning, diligence,
and natural acutenefs, would
have rendered him eminent IL
the fcience Of medicine, had he
perfevered in that Profeillon, @
ther paris Of his character were
i'll fuitcd for augmentlng lllS
practice. He could neither ltooP
to impofc on credulity, nor hu--
NOR caprice. He was Of an IN.
trepid, independent, imPrudent
difPohtion, equally incapable Of
deceit and adulation, and more
difpofcd to cultivate the acquain-
lance of tholc he could ierve,
than Of thoGe who could ierve
him. What wonder that man,
Of this character, was not, what
is called, fuccelSful in life ?