Panama as a tax haven
# Panama as a tax haven

Part of a series on :

Taxation :

An aspect of fiscal policy :

Policies

Government revenue

Property tax equalization

Tax revenue

Non-tax revenue

Tax law

Tax bracket

Flat tax

Tax threshold

Exemption

Credit

Deduction

Tax shift

Tax cut

Tax holiday

Tax amnesty

Tax advantage

Tax incentive

Tax reform

Tax harmonization

Tax competition

Tax withholding

Double taxation

Representation

Unions

Medical savings account :

Economics

General Theory

Price effect

Excess burden

Tax incidence

Laffer curve

Optimal tax

Theories

Optimal capital income taxation

Distribution of Tax

Tax rate

Flat

Progressive

Regressive

Proportional :

Collection

Revenue service

Revenue stamp

Tax assessment

Taxable income

Tax lien

Tax refund

Tax shield

Tax residence

Tax preparation

Tax investigation

Tax shelter

Tax collector

Private tax collection

Tax farming :

Noncompliance

General

Tax avoidance

Repatriation tax avoidance

Tax evasion

Tax resistance

Tax shelter

Smuggling

Black market

Unreported employment

Corporate

Tax inversion

Transfer mispricing

Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)

Double Irish

Dutch Sandwich

Single Malt

CAIA/Green Jersey

Locations

Tax havens

Corporate havens

Offshore financial centres (OFCs)

Offshore magic circle

Conduit and sink OFCs

Financial centres

Financial Secrecy Index

Major examples

Ireland as a tax haven

Ireland v Commission

Leprechaun economics

Liechtenstein tax affair

Luxembourg Leaks

Offshore Leaks

Paradise Papers

Panama Papers

Swiss Leaks

United States as a tax haven

Panama as a tax haven :

Types

Direct

Indirect

Per unit

Ad valorem

Aviation

Airport improvement

Landing

Solidarity

Capital gains

Expatriation

Consumption

Departure

Hotel

Sales

Stamp

Television

Tourist

Value-added

Dividend

Environmental tax

Carbon

Landfill

Natural resources consumption

Severance

Steering

Stumpage

Excise

Alcohol

Cigarette

Fat

Meat

Sin

Sugary drink

Tobacco

General

Georgist

Gift

Gross receipts

Hypothecated

Income

Inheritance (estate)

Land value

Luxury

Payroll

Pigouvian

Property

Single

Surtax

Turnover

Use

User charge/fee

Congestion

Fuel

Road/GNSS

Toll

Vehicle miles traveled

Corporate profit

Excess profits

Windfall

Negative (income)

Wealth :

International

Financial transaction tax

Currency transaction tax

European Union Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)

Global minimum corporate tax rate

Tobin tax

Spahn tax

Tax equalization

Tax treaty

Permanent establishment

Transfer pricing

European Union FTT

Foreign revenue rule :

Trade

Custom

Duty

Tariff

Import

Export

Tariff war

Free trade

Free-trade zone

Trade agreement

ATA Carnet :

Research

Academic

Mihir A. Desai

Dhammika Dharmapala

James R. Hines Jr.

Ronen Palan

Joel Slemrod

Gabriel Zucman

Advocacy groups

Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)

Oxfam (UK)

Tax Foundation (US)

Tax Justice Network (TJN)

Tax Policy Center (US) :

Religious

Church tax

Eight per thousand

Teind

Tithe

Fiscus Judaicus

Leibzoll

Temple tax

Tolerance tax

Jizya

Kharaj

Khums

Nisab

Zakat :

By country

All Countries

List of countries by tax rates

Tax revenue to GDP ratio

Tax rates in Europe

Individual Countries

Albania

Algeria

Argentina

Armenia

Australia

Azerbaijan

Bangladesh

Bhutan

Brazil

Bulgaria

BVI

Canada

China

Colombia

Croatia

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hong Kong

Iceland

India

Indonesia

Iran

Ireland

Israel

Italy

Japan

Kazakhstan

Lithuania

Malta

Morocco

Namibia

Netherlands

New Zealand

Norway

Pakistan

Palestine

Peru

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Russia

South Africa

Sri Lanka

Sweden

Switzerland

Taiwan

Tanzania

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United States

Uruguay :

Business portal

 Money portal :

vte :

The Republic of Panama is one of the oldest and best-known tax havens in the Caribbean, as well as one of the most established in the region. Panama has had a reputation for tax avoidance since the early 20th century, and Panama has been cited repeatedly in recent years as a jurisdiction which does not cooperate with international tax transparency initiatives.

Panama's offshore sector is intimately tied to the Panama canal, which has made it a gateway and entrepôt for international trade. There are strong similarities between Panama and other leading tax havens like Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai. On paper at least, Panama has the largest shipping fleet in the world, greater than those of the US and China combined, according to the Tax Justice Network.

## Background (1910s–1970s)

A 2014 investigation by journalist Ken Silverstein published in Vice Magazine explains how Panama came into being, with US help:

   In 1903, the administration of Theodore Roosevelt created the country after bullying Colombia to hand over what was then the province of Panama. Roosevelt acted at the behest of various banking groups, among them J. P. Morgan & Co., which was appointed as the country's official "fiscal agent".

The Roosevelt administration sought to foment armed rebellion by Panamanian nationalists, forcing Panama away from a politically fragile Colombia. Roosevelt achieved this goal with the help of William Nelson Cromwell, a well-connected US Republican lawyer and also legal counsel for JP Morgan's railroad interests. The administration's key objective was allegedly to install a pro-US Panamanian government that would secure US rights over the Panama Canal. The Hay–Bunau-Varilla Treaty resulted, establishing permanent U.S. rights to a Panama Canal Zone several miles wide, across the neck of the isthmus. Panama became independent from Colombia the same month, and the Panama Canal opened in 1914.

According to a 2013 academic study published by the Norwegian Center for Taxation, Panama's reputation as a tax haven began in the year 1919, when it began registering foreign ships in order to help Standard Oil avoid US taxes and regulations; other US ship owners followed, some seeking to avoid the higher wages and better working conditions imposed by US legislation such as the Seaman's Act and safety standards for sea vessels. Also, during the Prohibition era, US passenger ships were allowed to serve alcohol to their customers without breaking the law if they had Panamanian registration.

Within a few years, Panama extended its minimalist approach to taxation, regulation and financial disclosure requirements to the world of offshore finance. According to the study, "Wall Street interests helped Panama introduce lax company incorporation laws, which let anyone start tax-free, anonymous corporations, with few questions asked".

## Background (1970s–present)

For decades, offshore finance had a relatively modest profile in Panama, but it took off in the 1970s as world oil prices surged. During this time, the Republic of Panama passed legislation "entrenching corporate and individual financial secrecy".

By 1982, partly attracted by business opportunities deriving from the Panama Canal and its free trade zone, more than 100 international banks had offices in Panama City.

According to Investopedia: "Panama's offshore jurisdiction offers a wide array of excellent financial services, including offshore banking, the incorporation of offshore companies, registration of ships and the formation of Panama trusts and foundations." In Panama, no taxes are imposed on offshore companies which engage in business solely outside of the jurisdiction; therefore, the companies which are incorporated in the Republic of Panama and the owners of these companies are exempt from corporate taxes, withholding taxes, capital gains tax, local taxes, estate taxes and inheritance tax. However, businesses within Panama itself are permitted to conduct business there so long as the company pays its local taxes.

Panama has been cited repeatedly in recent years by the State Department of the United States and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as a jurisdiction which does not cooperate with international tax transparency initiatives due to the legislation which regulates the country's offshore jurisdiction and financial services. Panama has over 350,000 international business companies (IBCs) registered, the third largest number in the world after Hong Kong and the Virgin Islands. Alongside incorporation of IBCs, Panama is active in forming tax-evading foundations and trusts, insurance, and boat and shipping registration, according to the Tax Justice Network.

### Financial privacy

An extensive amount of legislation currently exists in the Republic of Panama to protect corporate and financial privacy. However, organisations such as the Tax Justice Network and other advocacy groups and non-governmental organisations state that the main intention of these laws is financial secrecy, as opposed to privacy.

The names of shareholders of Panamanian corporations, trusts and foundations are still not required by law to be publicly registered. Panama has no exchange controls: this means that for individual clients of Panama's offshore banking, as well as for offshore business entities incorporated in Panama, there are no limits or reporting requirements on money transfers into or out of the country.

Panama also has very strict banking secrecy laws: for example, it is forbidden for Panamanian banks to share any information about offshore bank accounts or account holders, except under special circumstances instigated by the Panamanian authorities. Such regulation has made it difficult to investigate the true extent of the Panama Papers leak, as severe criminal penalties are enacted to individuals who breach confidentiality.

Despite this, Panama does not appear on the Tax Justice Network's top ten list for financial secrecy, with Alex Cobham of Tax Justice Network saying "There is a double standard: many developed countries host or support jurisdictions where there is an absence of financial transparency".

## Accusations

Pascal Saint Amans, Director of the Centre for Tax Policy and Administration in the OECD said: "From the standpoint of reputation, Panama is still the only place where people still believe they can hide their money." Writing for VICE News, Ken Silverstein explained the Mossack Fonseca history in the region: "These laws attracted a long line of 'dirtbags' and dictators who used Panama to hide their stolen loot, including Ferdinand Marcos, 'Baby Doc' Duvalier, and Augusto Pinochet. When Manuel Noriega, commander of the Panama Defence Forces, took power in Panama in 1983, Silverstein said, Noriega essentially nationalised the money-laundering business; he partnered with the Medellin drug cartel and gave it free rein to operate in the country."

In the United Kingdom, Private Eye used data collected from the Land Registry to create "an easily searchable online map ... of properties in England and Wales owned by offshore companies. It reveals for the first time the extent of the British property interests held by companies based in tax havens." Most of these properties are tax avoidance vehicles and in some cases also to conceal wealth of dubious origin."

A 2003 examination of tax havens by Jeffrey Robinson quotes a US Customs official as saying:

   [Panama] is filled with dishonest lawyers, dishonest bankers, dishonest company formation agents and dishonest companies registered there by those dishonest lawyers so that they can deposit dirty money into their dishonest banks. The Free Trade Zone is the black hole through which Panama has become one of the filthiest money laundering sinks in the world.

### Tax Justice Network

The advocacy group the Tax Justice Network has described Panama as "the recipient of drugs money from Latin America, plus ample other sources of dirty money from the US and elsewhere". It said "now is a good moment to draw attention to how Panama developed as a secrecy jurisdiction and how it continues to provide full service – wash, rinse and dry – to crooks and money launderers from around the world."

## Response

Ramón Fonseca Mora, the co-founder of Mossack Fonseca, told the New York Times: "I assure you there is more dirty money in New York, Miami and London than there is in Panama". The United States is an alleged tax haven despite the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. The US has refused the Common Reporting Standard set up by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. This means the US receives tax and asset information for American assets and income abroad, but does not share information about what happens in the United States with other countries; in other words, the US has become attractive as a tax haven.

