International tax planning
# International tax planning

Part of a series on :

Taxation :

An aspect of fiscal policy :

Policies

Government revenue

Property tax equalization

Tax revenue

Non-tax revenue

Tax law

Tax bracket

Flat tax

Tax threshold

Exemption

Credit

Deduction

Tax shift

Tax cut

Tax holiday

Tax amnesty

Tax advantage

Tax incentive

Tax reform

Tax harmonization

Tax competition

Tax withholding

Double taxation

Representation

Unions

Medical savings account :

Economics

General Theory

Price effect

Excess burden

Tax incidence

Laffer curve

Optimal tax

Theories

Optimal capital income taxation

Distribution of Tax

Tax rate

Flat

Progressive

Regressive

Proportional :

Collection

Revenue service

Revenue stamp

Tax assessment

Taxable income

Tax lien

Tax refund

Tax shield

Tax residence

Tax preparation

Tax investigation

Tax shelter

Tax collector

Private tax collection

Tax farming :

Noncompliance

General

Tax avoidance

Repatriation tax avoidance

Tax evasion

Tax resistance

Tax shelter

Smuggling

Black market

Unreported employment

Corporate

Tax inversion

Transfer mispricing

Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)

Double Irish

Dutch Sandwich

Single Malt

CAIA/Green Jersey

Locations

Tax havens

Corporate havens

Offshore financial centres (OFCs)

Offshore magic circle

Conduit and sink OFCs

Financial centres

Financial Secrecy Index

Major examples

Ireland as a tax haven

Ireland v Commission

Leprechaun economics

Liechtenstein tax affair

Luxembourg Leaks

Offshore Leaks

Paradise Papers

Panama Papers

Swiss Leaks

United States as a tax haven

Panama as a tax haven :

Types

Direct

Indirect

Per unit

Ad valorem

Aviation

Airport improvement

Landing

Solidarity

Capital gains

Expatriation

Consumption

Departure

Hotel

Sales

Stamp

Television

Tourist

Value-added

Dividend

Environmental tax

Carbon

Landfill

Natural resources consumption

Severance

Steering

Stumpage

Excise

Alcohol

Cigarette

Fat

Meat

Sin

Sugary drink

Tobacco

General

Georgist

Gift

Gross receipts

Hypothecated

Income

Inheritance (estate)

Land value

Luxury

Payroll

Pigouvian

Property

Single

Surtax

Turnover

Use

User charge/fee

Congestion

Fuel

Road/GNSS

Toll

Vehicle miles traveled

Corporate profit

Excess profits

Windfall

Negative (income)

Wealth :

International

Financial transaction tax

Currency transaction tax

European Union Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)

Global minimum corporate tax rate

Tobin tax

Spahn tax

Tax equalization

Tax treaty

Permanent establishment

Transfer pricing

European Union FTT

Foreign revenue rule :

Trade

Custom

Duty

Tariff

Import

Export

Tariff war

Free trade

Free-trade zone

Trade agreement

ATA Carnet :

Research

Academic

Mihir A. Desai

Dhammika Dharmapala

James R. Hines Jr.

Ronen Palan

Joel Slemrod

Gabriel Zucman

Advocacy groups

Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)

Oxfam (UK)

Tax Foundation (US)

Tax Justice Network (TJN)

Tax Policy Center (US) :

Religious

Church tax

Eight per thousand

Teind

Tithe

Fiscus Judaicus

Leibzoll

Temple tax

Tolerance tax

Jizya

Kharaj

Khums

Nisab

Zakat :

By country

All Countries

List of countries by tax rates

Tax revenue to GDP ratio

Tax rates in Europe

Individual Countries

Albania

Algeria

Argentina

Armenia

Australia

Azerbaijan

Bangladesh

Bhutan

Brazil

Bulgaria

BVI

Canada

China

Colombia

Croatia

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hong Kong

Iceland

India

Indonesia

Iran

Ireland

Israel

Italy

Japan

Kazakhstan

Lithuania

Malta

Morocco

Namibia

Netherlands

New Zealand

Norway

Pakistan

Palestine

Peru

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Russia

South Africa

Sri Lanka

Sweden

Switzerland

Taiwan

Tanzania

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United States

Uruguay :

Business portal

 Money portal :

vte :

International tax planning also known as international tax structures or expanded worldwide planning (EWP), is an element of international taxation created to implement directives from several tax authorities following the 2008 worldwide recession.

## History

In 2010, the United States introduced the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). Later the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) expanded these directives and proposed a new international system for the automatic exchange of information – known as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS). The organisation also attempted to limit companies’ ability to shift profits to low-tax locations, a practice known as base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The goal of this worldwide exchange of tax information being tax transparency, it requires the exchange of a significant volume of information. As a result, there are concerns about privacy and data breach in interested industries. EWP has been an important element on the agenda of the OECD following the succession of leaked revelations about various jurisdictions, including the Luxembourg Leaks, Panama papers and Paradise papers. In December 2017, European Union finance ministers blacklisted 17 countries for refusing to co-operate in its investigation on tax havens.

## Principles

EWP allows a tax paying entity to simplify its existing structures and minimize reporting obligations under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and CRS. At the heart of EWP is a properly constructed Private placement life insurance (PPLI) policy that allows taxpayers to use the regulatory framework of life insurance to structure assets along the client's planning needs. These international assets can also comply with tax authorities worldwide. EWP also brings asset protection and privacy benefits that are set forward in the six principals of EWP below. The other elements in the EWP structure may include the client's citizenship, country of origin, actual residence, insurance regulations of all concerned jurisdictions, tax report requirements, and client's objectives.

Planning with trust and foundations frequently offer only limited tax planning opportunities whereas EWP provides a tax shield. Adding a PPLI policy held by the correct entity in the proper jurisdiction creates a notable planning opportunity.

## Features

### Privacy

EWP gives privacy and compliance with tax laws. It also enhances protection from data breach and strengthens family security. EWP allows for a tax compliant system that still respects basic rights of privacy. EWP addresses the concerns of law firms and international planners about some aspects of CRS related to their clients' privacy. EWP assists with the privacy and welfare of families by protecting their financial records and keeping them in compliance with tax regulations.

### Asset protection

EWP protects assets with segregated account legislation by using the benefits of life insurance. This structure uses asset protection laws in the jurisdictions of residence to shield these assets from creditors' claims. A trust with its own asset protection provisions can still receive additional protection with the policy.

### Succession planning

EWP includes transfers of assets without forced heirship rules directly to beneficiaries using a controlled and orderly plan. This element of EWP provides a wealth holder a method to enact an estate plan according to his/her wishes without complying forced heirship rules in the home country. This plan must be coordinated with all the aspects of a properly structured PPLI policy together with other elements of a wealth owner's financial and legal planning.

### Tax shield

EWP adds tax deferral, income, estate tax benefits and dynasty tax planning opportunities. Assets held in a life insurance contract are considered tax-deferred in most jurisdictions throughout the world. Likewise, PPLI policies that are properly constructed shield the assets from all taxes. In most cases, upon the death of the insured, benefits are paid as a tax free death benefit.

### Compliance simplifier

EWP adds ease of reporting to tax authorities and administration of assets, commercial substance to structures. In addition, the insurance company is considered the beneficial owner of the assets. This approach greatly simplifies reporting obligations to tax authorizes because assets in the policy are held in segregated accounts and can be spread over multiple jurisdictions worldwide.

### Trust substitute

EWP creates viable structure under specific insurance regulations for civil law jurisdictions. It also creates a new role for commercial trust companies. In most civil law jurisdictions, trusts are poorly acknowledged and trust law is not well developed. As a result, companies with foreign trusts in these civil law jurisdictions, face obstacles.

