The Class Struggles in France, 1848–1850
# The Class Struggles in France, 1848–1850

Part of a series on :

Marxism :

Theoretical works

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844

The German Ideology

Wage Labour and Capital

The Communist Manifesto

The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte

Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie

A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy

Das Kapital

Critique of the Gotha Programme

Dialectics of Nature

Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism

The State and Revolution

History and Class Consciousness

On Contradiction

Prison Notebooks

Dialectic of Enlightenment

The Wretched of the Earth

Guerrilla Warfare

Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses

Women, Race and Class

Empire (Hardt and Negri book) :

Philosophy

Dialectical materialism

Philosophy of nature :

Critique of political economy

Capital (accumulation)

Crisis theory

Commodity

Concrete and abstract labor

Factors of production

Falling profit-rate tendency

Means of production

Mode of production

Asiatic

Capitalist

Socialist

Productive forces

Scientific socialism

Surplus product

Socially necessary labour time

Value-form

Wage labour :

Sociology

Alienation

Base and superstructure

Bourgeoisie

Class

Class consciousness

Class struggle

Classless society

Commodity fetishism

Communist society

Critique of political economy

Cultural hegemony

Democracy

Dictatorship of the proletariat

Exploitation

Human nature

Ideology

Immiseration

Imperialism

Lumpenproletariat

Metabolic rift

Proletariat

Private property

Relations of production

Reification

State theory

Working class :

History

Philosophy in the Soviet Union

Primitive accumulation

Proletarian revolution

World revolution

Theory of historical trajectory :

Aspects

Aesthetics

Archaeology

Criminology

Cultural analysis

Cultural Studies

Ethics

Film theory

Geography

Historiography

Literary criticism

Marxism and religion

Sociology

Philosophy :

Orthodox variants

Analytical

Black

Classical

Feminist

Hegelian

Humanist

Instrumental

Leninism

Trotskyism

Maoism

Neo

Open

Post

Structural

Western

Marxism–Leninism

Anti-revisionism

Marxism–Leninism–Maoism

Gonzalo Thought

Socialism with Chinese characteristics

Titoism :

Left communist variants

Bordigism

Communization

Council communism :

Libertarian variants

Autonomism

Situationism :

Other variants

Austromarxism

Eurocommunism

Neo-Gramscianism

Neue Marx-Lektüre

Revisionist :

People

Marx

Engels

Morris

Lafargue

Kautsky

Plekhanov

Du Bois

Connolly

Lenin

Luxemburg

Kollontai

Hilferding

Trotsky

Grossman

Zinoviev

Bloch

Lukács

Korsch

Bukharin

Bordiga

Ho

Serge

Gramsci

Pashukanis

Nosaka

Benjamin

Mao

Mariátegui

Toledano

Horkheimer

Volpe

Dutt

Brecht

Marcuse

Bordiga

Fromm

Neumann

Lefebvre

James

Adorno

Padmore

Sartre

Deutscher

Beauvoir

Nkrumah

Sweezy

Emmanuel

Hill

Bettelheim

Draper

Jones

Hobsbawm

Althusser

Hinton

Williams

Freire

Mandel

Sivanandan

Miliband

Lefort

Cabral

Thompson

Bauman

Fanon

Kosik

Berger

Castro

Guevara

Heller

Guattari

Mészáros

O'Connor

Wallerstein

Mies

Tronti

Debord

Amin

Hall

Nairn

Parenti

Negri

Jameson

Dussel

Harvey

Laclau

Bahro

Poulantzas

Vattimo

Badiou

Altvater

Anderson

Löwy

Resnick

Vogel

Sison

Easthope

Rancière

Berman

Przeworski

Blackburn

Cohen

Therborn

Ahmad

Losurdo

Ture

Postone

Rodney

Spivak

Newton

Sakai

Wood

Federici

Wolff

Balibar

Eagleton

Hartsock

Rowbotham

Mouffe

Geras

Brenner

Davis

Cleaver

Bishop

Haraway

Panitch

Clarke

Jessop

Davis

Wright

Fraser

Holloway

Screpanti

McLaren

Tamás

Hampton

Cano

Žižek

Sankara

Hennessy

McDonnell

Douzinas

Cockshott

Roediger

Foster

West

Ghandy

Marcos

Tarasov

Prashad

Merrifield

Varoufakis

Kelley

Linera

Fisher

Li

Barker

Coulthard

Malm

Seymour

Toscano

Bhattacharya

Moufawad-Paul

Srnicek

Horvat

Hamza

Saito :

Journals

Capital & Class

Capitalism Nature Socialism

Catalyst

Constellations

Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory

Historical Materialism

Mediations

Monthly Review

New Left Review

Race & Class

Rethinking Marxism

Science & Society

Socialism and Democracy

Socialist Register :

Related topics

21st-century communist theorists

Anarchism

Anarcho-communism

Creative destruction

Critical theory

Criticism of Marxism

Communism

Communalism

Economic determinism

Historical determinism

History of communism

Left-wing politics

Marxian economics

New Left

Old Left

Municipalism

Political ecology

Radical democracy

Social democracy

Socialism

Authoritarian

Democratic

Libertarian

Market

Reformist

Revolutionary

Utopian

Soviet democracy

Left-wing populism

Universal class

Vulgar Marxism

Economism

Worker cooperative

Workers' council :

Related categories Karl Marx

Philosophy of history :

Outline

 Communism portal

 Philosophy portal

 Socialism portal :

vte :

The Class Struggles in France, 1848 to 1850 was a set of articles written by Karl Marx for the newspaper Neue Rheinische Zeitung in 1850. The works were collated and republished in 1895 by Friedrich Engels.

## Contents of the articles

In these works Marx analyzes the class issues and the economic relations which drove forward the social and political upheavals, which took place in France in 1848. He focuses extensively on the argument that the conflict was not between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, but between different factions within the bourgeoisie. Specifically, he identifies conflicts between the industrial bourgeoisie, whose wealth and income are dependent upon the production and sale of goods; and the financial bourgeoisie, whom he identifies as bankers and stock market speculators.

### Manipulated public policy

Marx identifies a political system where the individuals responsible for the development of public policy and the direction of public funds, were the same individuals whose investments stood to be affected by these decisions. The result of this, he claims, was that public policy was manipulated for the sake of self enrichment, giving the example of extensive railroad projects being developed with public funds under the direction of legislators who were also the main investors in these endeavors.

Marx asserts, however, that, while this situation was deemed intolerable to the industrial bourgeoisie, they were not in any position to take serious action against it. The industrial bourgeoisie still occupied a comparatively privileged position within society and government and this fact, Marx argues, placed them in essentially the main camp as the financial bourgeoisie.

### Public revolt

Where Marx identifies the change in the situation that made the public revolt possible is in a set of financial crises further afield that had deleterious effects on the economic situation in France. Specifically, he identifies a set of crop failures in 1845 and 46, and then a more general economic crisis which gripped England in the late 1840s. This crisis saw a wave of bankruptcies and factory closures throughout Britain and it was in the midst of the aftershocks that this crisis sent across the European continent, Marx asserts, that the February Revolution took place.

Marx asserts in these works that England, in that time, was setting the tone for bourgeois society in general, and blames this on the nature of the trade imbalances which then existed. He paints a picture of France exporting most of its consumer goods to England, while England exports most of it consumer goods further abroad. In the same way he interprets the crises which effect England afterwards going on to effect the continent.

Thus, he claims, the general economic crisis in England led to a general economic crisis in France, and that this crisis was the cause of the revolution of February 1848. This prompts him to demonstrate why no such revolution occurred in England and for this he offers the explanation that England was more thoroughly industrialized. England, he claims, needed no revolution because the industrialists already constituted such a great power, socially and politically, that they were able to confront the runaway power of speculative finance directly. France, however, was still far more heavily agrarian, while the industrialist class, though wealthy and powerful in its own right, did not wield sufficient power to carry through such a confrontation. It was only in the aftermath of the above mentioned economic crises that the industrial bourgeoisie found themselves forced to align themselves with the agrarian classes against the financial bourgeoisie. Thus Marx concludes that, in spite of the proletarian character and slogans of the revolution the proletariat were used mostly as a prop, and that as soon as the new republic was established the proletariat were more or less ejected from the circles of power.

### Analyses

Marx goes on to describe how this use of the proletariat as a prop to dethrone the financial bourgeoisie on the behalf of the industrial bourgeoisie left the bourgeoisie so disillusioned and alienated as to fall into support for Louis Bonaparte, a man who Marx speaks of very disparagingly. He argues that Bonaparte's lack of character was central to his popularity as he was able to signify different things to different constituents and therefore build a broad base of support among groups that, according to Marx, share few mutual goals and interests.

Finally, Marx draws together the analyses of the political upheavals in France and the economic crises triggered, originally, in England and spreading outward to the continent; and from these analyses builds the argument that these upheavals in France, which seemed like a grand political shift in one nation, marked only minor change within the superstructure of a social and economic system which was multinational in character.

