Nizar ibn Ma'ad
# Nizar ibn Ma'ad

Nizar ibn Ma'ad ibn Adnan (Arabic: نزار بن معد بن عدنان) was the common ancestor of most of the northern Arab tribes (the Adnanites), according to the Arab genealogical tradition. As a result, the term 'Nizar', or Nizariyya (نزارية), has been used as a loosely defined name for a group of tribes, most commonly the Rabi'a and Mudar tribes, but occasionally extended to include others.

## Ancestry

His father is Ma'ad ibn Adnan, while his mother, Mu'ana bint Jahla, hailed from the South Arabian Jurhum tribe. More notable are his four sons, and progenitors of major tribal groupings: Rabi'a, Mudar, Anmar, and Iyad. According to the Arab genealogists, Mudar and Iyad were sired by Sawda bint Akk ibn Adnan, and Rabi'a and Anmar by Hadala bint Wa'lan of the Jurhum.

### Family tree

| | | | | | | Ma'ad ibn Adnan | Ma'ad ibn Adnan | Ma'ad ibn Adnan | Ma'ad ibn Adnan | Ma'ad ibn Adnan | Ma'ad ibn Adnan | | | | | | | Mu'ana bint Jahla | Mu'ana bint Jahla | Mu'ana bint Jahla | Mu'ana bint Jahla | Mu'ana bint Jahla | Mu'ana bint Jahla | | | | | | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | | | | Quda'a | Quda'a | Quda'a | Quda'a | Quda'a | Quda'a | | | Nizar | Nizar | Nizar | Nizar | Nizar | Nizar | | | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | | | | |
| Mudar | Mudar | Mudar | Mudar | Mudar | Mudar | | | Rabi'a | Rabi'a | Rabi'a | Rabi'a | Rabi'a | Rabi'a | | | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | Iyad | | | Anmar | Anmar | Anmar | Anmar | Anmar | Anmar |

## Tribal label

The term Nizar is rarely attested in the pre-Islamic period. It is only after the Battle of Marj Rahit in 684, which cemented the rivalry between "southern" and "northern" Arab tribes, that the term Nizar (Banu Nizar or Nizariyya) begins to appear frequently, being used as an ethnic and political marker, contrasting with the southern "Yemeni" (Yamaniyya) or "Qahtanite" (Banu Qahtan) tribes. The term Ibna Nizar (lit. 'the two sons of Nizar') was applied to the two large "northern" tribal groups of Rabi'a and Mudar, who were previously considered as unrelated. The tribes claiming descent from Iyad or Anmar, who in some sources were regarded as sons of Ma'ad, were only rarely considered part of the Nizari tribes. The term remained vague and malleable, however: attempts were made to reclassify the Banu Kalb, originally of "southern" origin, as descendants of Nizar, since they were among the most important supporters of the "Nizari" Umayyad dynasty.

As the linguist and historian Giorgio Levi Della Vida writes, "it is evident that we cannot speak of Nizar as a tribe which had a real historical existence nor, as is the case with the Ma'add, as a comprehensive term indicating an effective grouping together of a number of tribes of different origin. Nizar is simply a fictitious invention, a label intended to serve political interests".

