{"character_count": 1502, "word_count": 272, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9373999834060669], "ccnet_perplexity": [1844.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
e.res an the subject and after d'spas.
s;o,,,e nerusal Of the Whole matter Ne
capno, think that any ono will diflsr win
= i oniaion. We have not gone 80 deeply
into This. mater because we deemed :
;mnortuns that charges Of the kind pro !
soasiost Gen. Jackson should be sllenceo;
eor whateyer might have been ''s
on;,;ons thew would have no weisn''
- Ear as a Tariff is concerned, on 'ne
minds of the people The question . 50
.nlo;n--,be fact that protectiou-in con-
pac,;on with tarifT-means taking from
one 70 Give to another, without the sane.
t;on &c the Constitution, is 50 palpaoly
n,,;o that every southern man can urder
l,and i TOO we'll ever to be deceived Dy
the sopI,istry OF The Wing party or M
aoenced BY the opinions Of great men
however high they may stand @ iheires
.,ima,ion. We are fully satisfied ina
Cen. Jackson never favored any othe
than a judfcious Tariff. The same rsa
sons that.induced himto vote Tor me lat
IiF OF 1924, induced almost every man =
1 Congress, at.that time, to vote for ~
yery same bill-many of whom Away


Ave been, and are yet, opposed to tar





!, if for protection.


II would be very great piece Of n
justice 10 accuse Mr. Wright, and man1
other leading Democrats, who voted 70
the late Tariff, Of being in favor Of !
/, high Protective Tariff, because It is wei


known that they yielded their Politic'
opinions 10 the necessity Of the case
: Gen. Jackson was actuated 10 his vote
: BY somewhat similarmotives, though th


circumstances were different.