we want the D ublic to know it.
{"character_count": 1727, "word_count": 322, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9848999977111816], "ccnet_perplexity": [1082.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
To know what! Why, that the Editor Of the OBJ
publishes bareaced fa!sehoods in his paper


See the first one:


To the Hon. Mr. Fillmore: A few days
ago, you, as Chairman of The Committee of
Ways and Means for the House Of Repre-
sentatives, introduced bill which you called
e Revenue bill,' the object of which was,
by raising the Tariff to increase the rerenue.
1t is evident that when you introduced that
bill you had not seen Mr. Henry's defence
of hims elf on this Tariff question, contain
ed in his organ of Saturday last.


See the nert:


The defence set up by MIR Henry through
his organ in this town in justification Of his
evading the payment of three:ft1hs of the Tax
to which he was annually subject, is a
most remarkable one.


Docs the Editor Of the Observer know that the ar
tcles referred to by him written by Mr. Henry
If he does not know it, he has laid himself liable
the charge Of publishing 'barefaced alsehoods" and
take occasion here to say that the articles referxed
to above by the Editor OF the Observer were
written by the whose name is at the head ofthis
paper and who tells the Editor aforesaid that he
told most barcaced falsehood," when he said to
the contrary, for MIR Henry knew nothing of them,
directly or indirectly.


is w e have cause to be proud that our editor I
ials attributed to such a Mr. Henry, and
we only notice it to shew the public what sort OF a
the aforesaid Editor is that he makes positive
assertions for which he has other foundation than
a suspicion.


Now let him prove that speak false, or else
take the lie and make the best Of it.


1t is question that the Editor might very profit
ably with himself, whether he ever tells the
truth when astory would suit him better.