{"character_count": 1032, "word_count": 200, "ccnet_language_score": [0.951200008392334], "ccnet_perplexity": [1023.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
A HARD HIT.-During the discussion.
In the Senate, of the tariff bill, lnow the law
ofthe land,) Mr.. Calhoun indulged in u ve-
ry fierce and harsh denuncia,ion of the bill,
calling tia measure of oppression, of abom-
nations, of plumber, and all sorts OF odious
names And. 10 illustrate and show the e
normity of the bill, he said, just take the du-
tg on rolled iron on which the farmer will
be Obliged to pay S25 per ton


Mr.. Buchanan, of Pennsylvania. answer
ed Mr. Calhoun, and said the duty on rolled
iron is not as high in this bill as it was un-
der the bill cf 1929. which imposed a duty
of $50 per ton The duty on rolled iron ls
not as high in this bill as the tariff of 1916.
which MIR. Calhoun advocated and voted for
This bill only imposes a duty of S25 per
ton on rolled iron, and Mr.. Calhoun's tariff
bill of 1916, which made him so popular
in Pennsylvania, imposed duty of $50 per
ton on rolled iron; that was g. higher in the
ton than this bill, which was now 50 much
denounced by MIR Calhoun.


Raleigh Register.