{"character_count": 1414, "word_count": 262, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9239000082015991], "ccnet_perplexity": [1631.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
i posr Ofr'eE cA'E--ir 2 ''S.'es
c..,rt ), schenectady, fsw days SINCE
~ s., paA,oas,er OF that city brought en-
...,;on 80 aaainst Mr.. John Foster, 70 re-
cove, , penalty Of SIS, for AZ alleged slo.
ls,;oa l e sec. 80 Of the Post Office Law
q,hs defendant, sometime in the month
= falv las,. mailed 1t the Post Office p
,t., ei,v ! Catalogue Of Unioa College,
a;rec,ed 10 tho Principal Of SPringsiae
Academy. On the first page Of the pam.
nb,et was written the words, with re-
snects Of J. Foster Il was con1endea
on the part Of the prosecution. that ne
words thus written was violation o.
the soth section Of the act. and the de'
fandant therefore Liable for the penalty
of es prescribed By TIA. section. On
The Dart Of the defendant il was insisted
,ba, tho words as written was not q vio-
,a,;on of the act-that it wasnot 9 mem
brandon within the spirit o. laas ses.'os
Secondly, that if it was memorandum
within the meaning ofthe 3oth sections
there was no evidence that i was maze
there With the intention Of having the
same conveyed free Of letter postage
The case was fully and ably argued b
the counsel for the respective parties
and submitted to the jury, who returned
q verdict for the defendant


The same jury by their verdict 70 an
/ other case, found that The words 'lhes'
six pages stereotyped,' written on
proof s,,eet and directed 70 the author 9
a work, subjects the same 70 letter pos
postage.