From the North Carolinian.
JUST READ THIS.
{"character_count": 1466, "word_count": 263, "ccnet_language_score": [0.955299973487854], "ccnet_perplexity": [1554.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Fayetteville Observer tells the Whining
ton folks that they ought to eat N. Carolina flour,
pork, butter, &c The Wilmington Chronicle
says, every true; but will the N. Carolina pro-
ducers of -four, pork, butter, SC. take the timber
and naval stores, and the rice of Wilmington in
payment for them? No Who will? The north
ern producer or his factor"


Here you see are two coon papers; but see
how differently they look at things. The Obser-
yer by his implied argument, would lay heavy
duty upon all the Southern flour, pork butter Sc,
which should come into the port of Wilmington,


in order to protect North Carolina produce; but
what does Wilmington say2 "No, you must not
do this for n. Carolina will not or cannot supply
US, and if she could, will not take such pay we
can give; therefore we must buy from those who
will take our timber and naval stores" Now ap-
ply these two arguments to national policy: The
Observers as implied, and the Chronicles as ex-
pressed and there is democratic and whig doctrine
in relation to Il tariff Which is TIE most reason
able, and to which does common sense give the
preference? Yet both the Observer and the
Chronicle support Mr.. Clay and his high tariff
notions. But the Chronicles honesty got the bet
ter of his Judgment that time "lls an i'll wind
that blows nobody no good" And this late para
graphing between the Observer and Chronicle,
has accomplished all we wish Study it we'll.
reader, in all its bearings.