{"character_count": 1511, "word_count": 272, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9625999927520752], "ccnet_perplexity": [1024.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Our neighbor of the Democrat, says he
didn't ',cinte" at "Ben Frankln's" essays.
Well in our apprehension he did, in his
lame answer TO Ben, when detected in
publishing an absolute falsehood. At any
rate he must have been "a lame duck "
He knows full well there IS not single
ayowel of Franklin's in favor of o protec.
tive tariff. and that their whole tenor have
been, from historical! facts, to enlighten his
fellow citizens of this State to manufacture
such articles for their own consumption,
as are practicable. You, say, your "tCith-
erS are unwrtng," but is not your Gran.
ium little discomposed, when shown, by
such positive proofs, you do not even at
tempt to disprove them, that your free
trade doctrines are those of the tories of
the revolution, the Hartford convention.
lists of the last war, and a colony Of aspi.
rants at this time who have emigrated
from all the parties that have ever exis.
ted in our republic and purloined the name
Of Democrats. We do not believe your
advice sincere, nor IS it at all necessary.
we opine you would be glad TO Lave US
publish matter that would injure our
cause. We always wish TO leciprocate
favors, we therefore request you to "stick
to your last" and come out with your
long ago promised essays in favor Of Free
Trade, alias British interests.


Ifycu will only look at our columns of
to-day, you will find the opinion of Jefer.
son on this subject which covers the whole
ground ofthose essays, just take that for a
text for your next article on free trade.