{"character_count": 744, "word_count": 139, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9430000185966492], "ccnet_perplexity": [2193.10009765625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mir. MATTHEWS ANTI BOND REPORT One position
taken in this report against the payment of the bonds the
assumed by Nc Mutt in his first 10 Hope & Co
that the sale Of the bonds par There read
ing in the State who does recoct hat the statements
of McNut trumphanty dspoved long before the last
general election But this the fact even if
the bank did receive hundred in the dollar those
bonds argues strong pedsposion gu5ble on the part
Of Mr. Matthews and his party when they set up that cir
and urge argument against the repay
of the actually received What does common hon


y require in such case Nanifestly that if we received
only part of the money the bonds should scrupulousIy
repay that part Any other is unworthy the peo
pie ofa grea: State