RIGHTS OF WOMEN.
{"character_count": 1737, "word_count": 317, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9606999754905701], "ccnet_perplexity": [1157.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
There is paper published in Bos-
ton called the Rose Bud, edited by q
lady. The way she occasionally rups


some OF her own sox ovor the head is
a caution. She says:


ave are extensively acquainted
with female operatives; and can safe
ly say, that, though generous, conf
ding, and lovely, they have great
deal more respect for character than
those in the higher circles, whose
faults, ifthey have any, are covered
with golden tapestry and thus hid
from the vulgar gaze of the world"


In the following she hits the bach
elors. Speaking of women, she
says,


sour aim now is, 10 defend her
rights to a liberal education; and to
defend the 'Seamstress,' or the wo-
man who takes in.' This class offe-
males have been imposed upon
Sneered at by the senseless elite and
their company Stunned as if a moral
pestilence mingled in their breath
The fact is, this is the most useful class
of females, and ought to be supported
and encouraged; and, instead of the
poor pittance which they now receive
under the namd of a0ages (?) hardly
enough to keep spirit and soul in ac-
ton, they should be literally paid,
that they might have heart to work,
and live comfortably, cheerfully, and
happy.


A tailor [may be a scamp of an old
bachelor, too can be paid price and
a half for undertaking garment,
which he sends toa female Seamstress'
whom he compeis so do the work for
one-halfprice; thus making for him.
self a clear profit of one hundred per
cent.--for what? Why, forsooth, cut
ting a garment Are women Slaves?
If so, lets have an understanding in
the matter; and let the lords ofcrea-
ton do the business of master and O.
verSeer as it should be done! Why let
us have any money at all? Won't
food and little clothing do just as
well ?"-GIo6e.