CITY INTELLIGENCE.

/. 8. DISTRICT COURT.


Before Judge BETTS.
{"character_count": 1370, "word_count": 248, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9541000127792358], "ccnet_perplexity": [2098.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
L. s. DISTRICT COURT.


Before Judge b ETTS.


The Court observed that several motions before for
decision The most important the -! George
Brown and the Messr Brooks they involved points
duciary questions bearing upon several oesuc as 10
how far persons acting under assignments or as factors,
could be considered debtors. The Court uesrouS
OF obtaining the opinion OF Judge Thompson the sub
ec,s embraced in them, and decision would be rem
dered until next Week


In The OF George W. Snow. application had been
made 10y the general assignee 10 be put III possession oil
for $780, held by the wife, and claimed y her as ili-
vidual property, having been given the proceeds OF
legacy a her by her mother The Court ordered that the
be handed the eusra assignee and that the
wife have liberty 10 canlc ana prove her claim To H.
In the case James Cropsy Mr. Nash made mot ION
tia, $50 in money, placed item petitioners schedule
he Sc, OH to him par, oitle $500 allowed by law, thav-
ny been demanded by the assignee but he having aeady
expended part oi The Cuur, deCreed that such mat
brou up by the genera! assignee. when petition
r if they tit, coud present their views IN respect TO
them.


Several petitions passed decree thoseo John
Taylor and Temple Fay stjected 10. Mr. Cark>o1
had leave through the day file objections in the case oi
Jose ph w. Bede and Moses Bede.