Correspondence of The Tribune.
{"character_count": 2603, "word_count": 468, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9168999791145325], "ccnet_perplexity": [1247.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
WASHINGTON, Monday, ArcA


Mr.. ADAMs's Report on the Veto, with prH
bly, one or two minority Reports, vii! be madv'
morrow to the House of Representatives. ID
give rise to an excited debate. All appearsps
doubt and uncertainty as to further action byla'
gress on the subject Of revenue this session. r
us to the time Of adjournment. The idea is GP
prevalent that the Senate will concur with tie
solution of the House for adjournment in sss
and that no further action on the Tariff vii
taken.


In SENATE, to-day, Mr.. ALLEN made an uin
cessful attempt to take up Mr.. PREsros's Hp
luton, declaring that moneys paid for the as
guishment of land titles should be re-imbursea&
of the land sales.


Mr.. YoUNo moved to take up the resolution h
ing the day for adjournment. Mr.. Bueg!p
would not agree to FIX any dsy until the n.y. tss
had had sufficient time to act on Rsyesae ~ !,
Mr. Preston suggested that the resolution y y
better lie over few days, when they woua :
enabled better to determine on the time OF adlalr
ment. He moved to postpone it to lhufa9 nif
carried, Yeas "a, Nays u. !.


The remainder of the day was consumed nass
in private business and few minutes III Essa'I
tive session.


In the HossE, MIR. WM. C. JoHssos made Il
other unsuccessful attempt for the appolainl,eef,
Select Committee on his pan for the tal' feIe
the States.


The House resolved itself into Conmlt.fsf'
the Whole, and struggle for business enspp:
Mr. AxsoLDs motion to take up his bill % rsen =
the pay Of Members of Congress and otlisr el4-
failed: Ayes IS; Noe.79.


On motion of Mr.. BARNARD, the b'li tepfp'rr
further remedial justice in the Courts o. vi i
States (the Mcleod billy was taken Up.
Barnard clearly aud concisely stated q the =.
pies and policy of the bill, and advocates as !.
sage. Mr.. c. J. IsoERsoLL moved TO posar,Ii II
its further consideratioa-rejeeted: s
Noes rs. Messrs. J. G. FLOYD, GoEdDes. =
SMITH Of Va. Gall Locos) Violently oPfpossea E
denoaneed the bill, as unconstitutional, a'ii's
on State rights and tending to the consolltda'ss
all power in the Federal Government.


Mr.. EVERETT briefly and punstsn
Piled to the States Rights arguments, ao1 !
vocated the bill on the ground that ls sg W. /
was the preservation Of peace and the consf.s
che Jurisdiction of the General Government l.
case which peace might be cenpromssfee,s Z,
taking the power from one State 10 inyoiys -
naming twenty-five in war By its Judicial PfV''
ings. ...Is ar /


Mr. SMITH, Of Va. moved to postpone w
ther consideration Of the bill; carried, sn
Noes SO. al
On motion of Mr. WISE, the bill from ne =