{"character_count": 503, "word_count": 86, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9902999997138977], "ccnet_perplexity": [395.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mir. Smith of Conn. advocated the repeal, which was demanded, he said by seven eighths of the people of Connecticut. The Law was retroactive and unconstitutional.

 Nr. Huntington dissented from this opin- ion with regard to the views of the people of Connecticut on this subject. He had voted for the law, and should not change his course, not having had intimations or instructions from his State to induce him to vote for the repeal of law which he believed would be highly beneficial.-N. Y. Tribune.