{"character_count": 1740, "word_count": 309, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9491999745368958], "ccnet_perplexity": [1878.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Q. Has not the country at large some.
thing TO say about this affaI2


A. The country al large has nothing to
do with il. We the democracy are he
country in its proper and legitimate sense.


Q. Ia what dictionary do you find your
definition?


A. In no dictionary We want no such
trash as Websler's, Walkers, or Johnson's
dictionaries. They were all rank Gristo-
Gratis, and that is enough for the true de-
mocracy.


@. Do you hold TO the doctrine that the
democracy of numbers, or as II. Bleecker
quantity calls it King numbers, is the true
test in a republican country as 10 what the
People want and ought to have.


A. II was once the doctrine when our
party was in the majority, but has heen
since exploded.


Q. Why soi


A.. Why-hecause-because it is rather
now an inconvenient doctrine.


Q. Please explain?


A. Well, if the truth must out, we have
lost already twenty States in the recent
elections, and we are confoundedly afraid
that we shall soon loose the rmaining six
We now incline 10 the opininAA. that the
minority OF numbers" should govern.


q. d. you consider Presidents orders
and opinions to be always defnilive and
conclusive upon the party?


A. Certainly; so long as he processes our
democracy.


Q, What do you consider the Bible Of
your democracyP


A. The Globe and Argus.


Q. Do YOU believe all they say7


A. Certainly.


Q, But when they contradict themselves,
how do you then manage?


A. We take their last assertions TO be
true democracy. We follow, in this, the
Revised Statutes, (and remember Mr. But.
eT was one of the revisors,) "lhe last clause,
or section, shall prevail"


q. Good day, sir; may ask you perhaps,
at another time, few more questions.


A. shall answer them with great pleas
ure. Q.