{"character_count": 2987, "word_count": 519, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9699000120162964], "ccnet_perplexity": [1963.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
ton. HewaS sure it was one of the Pet Bankat and opposed to the renewal of the charter of the U s. Bank.

 Mr. HUBBARD, of New Hampshire, appearS ed to be in high dudgeon at the answer of Mr. Webster, and vindicated the Collector of Boston, and the Secretary of the Treasury, in strong and high terms of praise. In con. cluson Mir. H. asked, if he intended to insin- uate that the Collector of Boston, or the Sec- retary of the Treasury, had paid out Com- monwealth Bank bills knowing them not to be good.

 Mir. WEBSTER said he intended to insinuate no such thing. But since MT. H. had ques- toned him, he would exercise a privilege of ms countrymeD, and guess the Senator from New Hampshire knew something of the re. lationship between the officers of the Govern mentand the Commonwealth Bank of Boston.

 Mir. HUBBARDupon his honor knew nothing, but he hoped that since the Senator had ex. pressed wish to have pensioners paid in gold money notions of the Administration. MT. WHISPERS reply was, can't mount that hobby. It is broken down and fallen to the ground" MT. w. said he was in favor of paying specie, or it's ca uivalent, to every man whom the Government owes dollar. MT. HUBBARD argued that if public credit ors had taken Commonwealth Bank bills, they had taken them to ETHER HEARTS CON- TENT" If one man was content to take Con- monwealth Bank bills for the debts due him, he ought to be satisfied and consider his debt satisfied.

 MT. WEBSTER, in reply, said an extract from letter before him stated" We have asked for gold and silver and Treasury notes -our answer was, we must take check up- on the Commonwealth Bank or take nothingI" Was this right! Was this the law! Was it doing nothing wrong! The Collector of Cus- toms thus paid fishing bounties in cheeks up- on the Commonwealth Bank, while the Pres ident of that Bank, who was Pension Agent, paid out Pensions in the same bills. WASHINGTON, Jan. l9. The Mississippi Contested Election discussion was resumed at o'clock, when Mr. Prentss of Missssip- p', resumed and finished his speech The conclusion was one of the most eloquent operations have heard m Congress and called forth universal burst ot admiration from all quarters of the house. Mir. Webster and other distinguished Senators, were tcntlve listeners and the house again full to were almost altogether legal and argumentativc. As such they commanded the almost undivided attention o both partles-bOth for the study, tact and talent hblted in the manner in which he presented his claims to the House. MT. Prcntiss having concluded, the Speaker informed MT Word, his colleague, that Word declined for the present.

 MT. Gholson, one of the sitting members, followed, but being indsposed, said but few wordsin defence of his own claims.

 MT. Foster followed in opposition, and in reply tn MT. Prentiss. He cOmpimented MT. P. upon his bril- liant speech-talked half hour about the manner of settling contested elections, and gave way to motion to adjourn