THURSDAY, JUNE 10.
{"newspaper_name": "Portland gazette and Maine advertiser.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 947, "word_count": 167, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9810000061988831], "ccnet_perplexity": [1434.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



Nh. Otis rofc in his place, and
complained Of a publication in the
Chronicle, of this day, retpecting
tie late Protef of the Minority Of
the Senate. He obfervcd, that it
was improbable the gentlemen injur-
ed would be allowed recels to the
fame medium to refute the itatement,
or ,hat they would ufe 70 polluted a
chanuel, if they were permitted TO-.
He crefore would fay, in the hope
tha. IL would reach the ear of the
author, though he could rot believe
he was a member of the Senate, that
whoever wrote the piece to which he
alluded, was prevaricator, and a
fanderer, and unworthy the conf
dence and notice of gentlemen.


.Attorney. GensraL-The motion OF
Mr.. Blifs was again conhdered, and,
after debate, negatived yeas II,
nays I8.-The fubjea was then pof
poned to tomorrow. A further in
yeitigation than has been made, the
majority appeared to confider prop
er, and it is expected committee
of the Senate will be appointed on
the fubje2.