COMMON POSITION (EC) No 10/98 adopted by the Council on 26 January 1998 with a view to adopting Decision No 98/../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action to improve the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme)
C 62/38 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 2. 98 COMMON POSITION (EC) No 10/98 adopted by the Council on 26 January 1998 with a view to adopting Decision No 98/. /EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action to improve the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme) (98/C 62/04) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 100a thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3), (1) Whereas in the internal market, the effective, uniform and efficient application of Community law is essential for the functioning of indirect taxation systems, in particular for the protection of national and Community interests through combating tax evasion and tax avoidance, avoiding distortions of competition and reducing burdens on administrations and taxpayers; financial (2) Whereas achieving this effective, uniform and efficient application is a matter for the Community in partnership with the Member States; whereas, although the Member States bear the greater responsibility in terms of resources, there is a significant role for the Community to play in providing an infrastructure and the necessary stimulus; (3) Whereas in order to ensure uniform application of that officials Community responsible for indirect taxation have a high common standard of understanding of Community law and its implementation in the Member States; is essential law it (1) OJ C 177, 11. 6. 1997, p. 8. (2) OJ C 19, 21. 1. 1998, p. 48. (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 20 November 1997 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Council Common Position of 26 January 1998 and Decision of the European Parliament of in the Official. (not yet published Journal). whereas such a standard can be achieved only through effective initial and continuous training the Member States; whereas provided by supplementary Community action is useful to coordinate and foster such training; (4) Whereas and effective efficient, extensive cooperation among Member States and between them and the Commission is important for the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal Community infrastructure for communication and information exchange is indispensable in order to achieve this the an objective; whereas Community makes it easier to reach a sufficient level of cooperation; whereas impetus market; from (5) Whereas continuing improvement of administrative procedures is essential for the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market; whereas, although the primary responsibility for achieving this rests with the Member States, supplementary Community action is needed to coordinate and stimulate such improvement; (6) Whereas, therefore, in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and of proportionality set out in Article 3b of the Treaty, the objectives of the measures laid down in this Decision cannot all be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Community level; whereas this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary for this purpose; (7) Whereas the operation of information-exchange systems at Community level in the field of indirect taxation, in particular the system relating to VAT (VIES) referred to in Council Regulation (EEC) No 218/92 of 27 January 1992 on administrative cooperation indirect taxation (VAT) (4) has shown the value of information in the field of (4) OJ L 24, 1. 2. 1992, p. 1. 26. 2. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 62/39 technology in protecting revenue while minimising administrative burdens; whereas those systems have proved to be essential tools of cooperation which have also stimulated greater cooperation among Member States; (8) Whereas communcation and information-exchange systems should be set up and their operation ensured in accordance with the changing needs of indirect taxation systems so as to ensure ongoing cooperation; (9) Whereas the experience gained by the Community from the programme established by Council Decision 93/588/EEC of 29 October 1993 on the adoption of a programme of Community action on the subject of the vocational training of indirect taxation officials (Matthaeus-tax) (1) and from multilateral control exercises has shown that exchanges, seminars and multilateral control exercises could achieve the objectives of the programme by bringing officials from different national in work activities; whereas those activities should therefore be continued; administrations together administrations, (10) Whereas seminars constitute an ideal framework for the exchange of ideas between officials of national Commission representatives and, if necessary, other indirect taxation experts; whereas suggestions may emerge legal from such seminars for instruments in force and facilitating cooperation between administrations with a view to enabling national indirect taxation systems to converge; improving the (11) Whereas the from gained experience the Matthaeus-tax programme has indicated that the coordinated development and implementation of a common training programme such as the one established by Commission Decision 95/279/EC of 12 July 1995 laying down certain provisions for implementing Council Decision 93/588/EEC on the adoption of a programme of Community action on the subject of the vocational training of indirect taxation officials (2) could achieve the objectives of this programme, in particular in achieving a higher common standard of understanding of Community law; whereas training programmes should be developed further in areas to be defined by the Commission and the Member States; whereas the Member States should therefore ensure that all their officials receive the initial training and regular continuous training envisaged by the common training programmes; (12) Whereas a sufficient standard of linguistic competence on the part of indirect taxation officials has proved to be essential to facilitate cooperation; whereas Member States should therefore provide the necessary language training for their officials; (13) Whereas the programme should be open to the participation of the associated countries of Central and Eastern Europe; whereas the programme should also be open to the participation of Cyprus; (14) Whereas the financing of the programme should be shared between the Community and Member States, and the Community contribution should appear in the general budget of the European Communities (part two, section III, Commission); (15) Whereas this Decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the principal point of reference, within the meaning of point 1 of the Declaration by the the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 6 March 1995 on incorporation into provisions financial legislative acts (3), for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure, of HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 Fiscalis programme A multiannual Community action programme (Fiscalis) hereinafter referred to as ‘the programme’, is hereby established for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2002 to improve the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market. It shall comprise the areas of action referred to in Articles 4, 5 and 6. (1) OJ L 280, 13. 11. 1993, p. 27. (2) OJ L 172, 22. 7. 1995, p. 24. (3) OJ C 102, 4. 4. 1996, p. 4. C 62/40 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 2. 98 Article 2 Definitions Article 4 Communication and information-exchange systems, manuals and guides For the purposes of this Decision: (a) ‘indirect taxation’ means those indirect taxes which come within the scope of Community legislation; (b) ‘administration’ means the public authorities Member States responsible for indirect taxation; in (c) ‘official’ means an official of an administration responsible for the application of Community or national law, regulations or procedures relating to indirect taxation; (d) ‘exchange’ means a working visit organised under the programme in the Community interest of an official from an administration in another Member State; (e) ‘multilateral controls’ means collaboration of at least three administrations to integrate and coordinate their controls of taxable persons having indirect tax obligations in the Member States concerned, within the Community legal framework for cooperation; (f) ‘the Community legal framework for cooperation’ means the body of Community legislation which provides for mutual assistance and administrative cooperation between Member States on indirect taxation. 1. The Commission and Member States shall ensure that such existing communication and information-exchange systems, manuals and guides as they consider necessary are operational. They shall establish and keep operational such new communication and information-exchange systems, manuals and guides as they consider necessary. 2. The Community components of the communication and information-exchange systems shall be the hardware, software and network connections, which must be common to all Member States so as to ensure the interconnection and interoperability of the systems, whether they be installed at the premises of the Commission (or a designated subcontractor) or at premises of Member a designated subcontractor). States (or of components non-Community 3. The the communication and information-exchange systems shall comprise the national databases forming a part of these systems, the Community and non-Community components and such software and hardware as each Member State shall deem appropriate for the full operation of those systems throughout its administration. connections between the network Article 3 Objectives Article 5 Exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls The objectives of the programme shall be to reinforce, through Community action, the efforts of Member States: (a) to enable officials to achieve a high common standard of understanding of Community law, in particular in the its implementation in Member States; taxation, and of field of indirect (b) to secure efficient, effective and extensive cooperation among Member States and between them and the Commission; (c) to the ensure of continuing administrative procedures to take account of the needs of administrations and taxpayers through the development and dissemination of good adminstrative practices. improvement 1. The Commission and Member States shall organise exchanges of officials. The exchanges may vary in length, depending on the case, but may not exceed six months. Each exchange shall be targeted on a particular work activity and shall be sufficiently prepared and evaluated afterwards by administrations concerned. the officals and The Member States shall take the necessary steps to enable exchange officials to play an effective part in the host administration’s activities and to this end such officials shall be authorised to carry out the tasks relating to the duties entrusted to them by the host administration in accordance with its legal system. During the exchange, the civil liability of the exchange official in the performance of his duties shall be treated in the host the same way as that of officials of 26. 2. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 62/41 administration. Exchange officials shall be bound by the same rules of professional secrecy as national officials. Article 7 Participation of the associated countries 2. The Commission and the Member States shall organise seminars to be attended by officials from the administrations, Commission representatives and, if necessary, other indirect taxation experts. 3. The Commission and the Member States may, within the Committee referred to in Article 11, choose, for experimental purposes, from among the multilateral controls organised by the Member States within the Community legal framework for cooperation those whose costs are to be borne by the Community in accordance with Article 8. The participating Member States shall send reports and evaluations concerning such controls to the Commission and to the Member States. The programme shall be open to the participation of the associated countries of Central and Eastern Europe in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements and the additional Protocols relating to their participation in Community programmes and in so far as Community law on indirect taxation so permits. The programme shall also be open to the participation of Cyprus in so far as Community law on indirect taxation permits. Article 8 Expenditure Article 6 Common training initiative 1. The expenditure necessary for implementation of the programme shall be divided between the Community and Member States in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3. 2. The Community shall bear the following: 1. In order to encourage structured cooperation between national training bodies and officials responsible for training in indirect taxation in administrations, Member States shall, in cooperation with the Commission: (a) develop existing training programmes and, where necessary, devise new programmes to provide a common core of training for officals so as to enable them to acquire the necessary common professional skills and knowledge; (b) where appropriate, open the training courses in indirect taxation provided by each Member State for its own officials to officials from all Member States; (c) develop the necessary common tools for indirect taxation training, including linguistic training tools. 2. Member States shall ensure that their officials receive the initial and continuous training necessary to acquire the common professional skills and knowledge in accordance with the common training programmes and the linguistic training necessary for those officials to attain a sufficient standard of linguistic competence. In accordance with Article 12(2), they shall inform the Commission of the content and amount of training that they provide for their officials. (a) the travel and subsistence expenses of officials participating in another Member State in the activities provided for in Article 5, the travel and subsistence expenses of the other indirect taxation experts participating in the seminars provided for in Article 5(2), and the organisation of the seminars; the costs likewise relating to (b) the cost of the development of the indirect taxation training tools provided for pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) and the manuals and guides provided for pursuant to Article 4(1); communication (c) the cost of the development, purchase, installation and maintenance of the Community components of information-exchange and the systems provided for in Article 4(2) and the cost of the Community the day-to-day operation of components the Commission (or a designated subcontractor); the premises of installed at (d) the cost of studies to be carried out, if necessary, by third parties on the impact of the programme, while guaranteeing the confidentiality of the data. 3. Member States shall bear the following: C 62/42 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 2. 98 (a) the costs relating to the initial and continuing training of their officials and to the linguistic training of their officials as provided for in Article 6. Member States shall bear the costs relating to the participation of in any extra activities organised their officials pursuant to Article 5, over and above those borne by the Community; the non-Community (b) the costs relating to the establishment and functioning the of communication and information-exchange systems provided for in Article 4(3) and the cost of the day-to-day operation of the Community components of those systems installed at their premises (or those of a designated subcontractor). components of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote. 3. (a) The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. (b) However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the Committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event: Article 9 Financial framework The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2002 is hereby set at ECU 40 million. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective. Article 10 Implementation The measures necessary for carrying out this programme shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11. The implementing measures shall not affect Community provisions governing collection and control and administrative cooperation and mutual assitance in the field of indirect taxation. Article 11 Committee 1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation in the field of Indirect Taxation established by Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 218/92. 2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of — the Commission shall defer application of the measures which it has decided for a period of of from three months communication, date the — the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the first indent. 4. In addition to the measures referred to in Article 10, the Committee shall consider matters raised by its Chairman, either on his own initiative or at the request of the representative of a Member State, concerning the application of this Decision. Article 12 Evaluation 1. The programme shall be subject to continuous evaluation, carried out jointly by the Commission and Member States. The evaluation shall be effected on the basis of the reports referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3. 2. Member States shall forward to the Commission: (a) by 30 June 2000 at the latest, an interim report; (b) by 31 December 2002 at the latest, a final report on the implementation and impact of the the programme. 3. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council: (a) by 30 June 2001 at the latest a communication, drawn up on the basis of the Member States’ interim reports, on the programme, accompanied, if necessary, by a suitable proposal; the desirability of continuing 26. 2. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 62/43 (b) by 30 June 2003 at the latest, a final report on the It shall apply from 1 January 1998. implementation and impact of the programme. The reports shall also be forwarded to the Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions for information. Article 14 Addressees This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Article 13 Entry into force Done at. ,. This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President C 62/44 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 2. 98 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 13 May 1997 the Commission submitted a proposal, based on Article 100a of the Treaty, for a European Parliament and Council Decision establishing a programme of Community action to reinforce the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme). 2. The European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee delivered their opinions on 20 November 1997 and 29 October 1997 respectively. The Commission submitted its amended proposal on 26 November 1997. 3. The Council adopted its common position, in accordance with Article 189b of the Treaty, on 26 January 1998. II. PURPOSE The purpose of the proposal is to contribute to the effective, uniform and efficient application of Community provisions on indirect taxation (first recital) and thus to reinforce the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Article 1). To the above end the Commission proposes a Community action programme lasting five years (1 January 1998 to 31 December 2002), called the Fiscalis programme (Article 1) with the purpose of reinforcing through Community action, chiefly by contributing to their funding, the efforts of Member States: (a) to achieve a high level of common understanding among officials of Community law, in particular in the field of indirect taxation, and its implementation in Member States; (b) to secure efficient, effective and extensive cooperation among Member States and between them and the Commission; (c) to ensure the continuing improvement of administrative procedures to take account of the needs of administrations and taxpayers through the development and dissemination of administrative best practice. It is also a matter of developing the technical infrastructure for communicating and exchanging information which, according to the Commission, plays a major role in reinforcing VAT and excise duty systems. The data-transmission infrastructure in question already exists in part in the form of the VIES, SCENT and SEED systems, which were developed and financed in the framework of the IDA programme adopted by the Council on 6 November 1995. The IDA programme expires at the end of 1997. The Fiscalis system is to replace the IDA programme in the field of indirect taxation and provide a new legal and budget basis for continuing the VIES, SEED and EMVS systems and facilitate the establishment of new systems in the future. However, the nature of the action is still the same: essentially its aim is to ensure at technical level the interconnection and interoperability of national data-transmission networks in the specific field of indirect taxes. The production of manuals and guides necessary for the smooth functioning of interconnected systems is to be regarded as an ancillary activity indissociable from that task. 26. 2. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 62/45 III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION The text was considerably recast during the discussion. The common position differs from the original Commission proposal on a number of points: — it should be clear that the objective of the Fiscalis programme is to ensure better coordination on the part of the Member States’ tax authorities. The indirect taxes more directly concerned are those managed by the Member States and their officials (Article 2), — the Commission and Member States are to ensure the functioning of existing communication and information exchange systems, manuals and guides. New systems, manuals and guides are to be established if they are considered necessary (Article 4), — the exchanges of officials organised by the Commission and the Member States may not be for longer than six months (Article 5), — Member States are to cooperate with the Commission in order to encourage cooperation between national training bodies and officials responsible for training in indirect taxation in administrations (Article 6), — the Community is to bear the cost of studies to be carried out by third parties on the impact of the programme, while guaranteeing the confidentiality of the data (Article 8), — the financial framework for the implementation of the programme may not exceed ECU 40 million for the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2002 (Article 9), — the standing Committee to assist the Commission in the implementation of the programme will have to act as an ad hoc management committee in accordance with procedure II (b) laid down in the Council Decision on ‘commitology’ (Decision 87/373/EEC). IV. AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. European Parliament amendments adopted in full or in part by the Council and the Commission The substance of amendment 1 (recital 7) was accepted because the information exchange systems do not only cover VAT. It was accordingly specified that the information exchange systems involved are ‘in the field of indirect taxation’. Amendment 2 (recital 10) was accepted as it helps to underline the role and importance of seminars in enabling national indirect taxation systems to converge. The substance of amendment 5 (Article 2(d)) was accepted, as Article 6(1)(b) stipulates that Member States are to open the training courses in indirect taxation provided for their own officials to officials from all Member States, where appropriate. Amendment 6 (Article 2(e)) was adopted, given that the definition of bilateral controls was no longer necessary owing to an amendment to Article 5(3). Amendment 7 (Article 3(a)) was adopted because the programme relates in particular to the field of indirect taxation. C 62/46 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 2. 98 Amendment 8 (Article 4(1)) was adopted, subject to a drafting amendment so that existing communication and information exchange systems, manuals and guides could be maintained where they were useful or amended or new ones established where necessary. Amendment 9 (Article 5(1)) was adopted, as it was considered reasonable both because exchanges of officials must not be for longer than six months and because exchanges were to be evaluated not only by the officials but also by the administrations concerned. The substance of amendment 10 (Article 5(2)) was accepted to allow indirect taxation experts other than officials from the national administrations and the Commission to attend seminars. The substance of amendment 11 (Article 5(3)) was accepted in so far as a choice would have to be made as to which exercises would be paid for by the Community if the number of applications ruled out financing all of them. Amendment 12 (Article 6) was accepted only in part. Hence, it was accepted that the development of training programmes and the devising of new programmes should be carried out by the Member States in cooperation with the Commission; however, instead of establishing a network for cooperation with the institutions responsible for training officials, the Council felt that it would be more desirable to encourage cooperation between training bodies and officials responsible for training in national administrations. — The new subparagraph (a) in paragraph 1 proposed by the European Parliament was not accepted. It was felt that the stipulation of the knowledge required, including the languages which officials must know, was a matter for individual Member States, — the new subparagraph (b) in paragraph 1 proposed by the European Parliament was reproduced in subparagraph 1(a), which stipulates that existing programmes must be developed and if necessary new training programmes devised to provide a common core of training, — the substance of the new subparagraph (c) proposed by the European Parliament was reproduced in subparagraph 1(b), as indicated above under amendment 5, — the new subparagraph (d) in paragraph 1 proposed by the Parliament was accepted and included in subparagraph (c), which states that Member States, — in cooperation with the Commission, may develop the necessary common tools for indirect taxation training, including linguistic training tools, — the new subparagraph (e) in paragraph 1 was not accepted. It was felt that the training of officials was a matter for Member States and should not be analysed by the other Member States or the Commission, — the amendment to paragraph 2 was accepted. It was added that officials should receive the necessary language training for them to attain a sufficient standard of linguistic competence. Amendment 13 (Article 8(2)(d)) was reproduced almost in whole, while guaranteeing the confidentiality of data. Amendment 14 (Article 10) was accepted because it helped clarify that the measures involved were measures for carrying out the programme. 26. 2. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 62/47 Amendment 15 (Article 12(3)(b)) was accepted because it is important that the Commission, in its report to the European Parliament and the Council, give information on the impact of the programme. 2. European Parliament amendments accepted by the Commission but not by the Council Amendment 3 (recital 11) was rejected as the Council only adopted part of amendment 12. Amendment 4 (recital 12) was not accepted, as the programme covered only indirect taxation, not customs. The oral amendment referring to Article 4(2) was not accepted. It was felt that if the need for recourse to subcontractors were to arise the financial provisions in force would obviously have to be complied with. The oral amendment referring to Article 7 was not accepted. It was pointed out that under the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements or in the additional Protocols relating to the participation of associated countries in Community programmes, the costs involved in such participation could not be covered from the funds earmarked for such programmes. The oral amendment referring to Article 9 was not accepted. It was considered adequate, as regards the financial framework, to state that the annual authorisations would be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective. V. AMENDMENTS MADE BY THE COUNCIL WHICH WERE PROPOSED BY NEITHER THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT NOR THE COMMISSION In Article 9, the financial framework was reduced to ECU 40 million. Such a sum was regarded as sufficient for attaining the objectives laid down in the programme. In Article 10, additional clarification was added to indicate the limits of such implementing measures, as the provisions governing collection, control, administrative cooperation and mutual assistance in the field of indirect taxation were dealt with in a separate legal framework. In Article 11, it was felt that the Committee responsible for assisting the Commission as regards administrative cooperation in the field of indirect taxation should deliver its opinions by qualified majority in accordance with procedure II(b) of the Council Decision on ‘commitology’ (Decision 87/373/EEC — Management Committee). It was felt that a mere ‘advisory’ committee as proposed by the Commission would not be appropriate for the tasks entrusted to it by this programme