Draft Commission Directive amending Directive 90/388/EEC in order to ensure that telecommunications networks and cable TV networks owned by a single operator are separate legal entities
7. 3. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 71/23 Draft Commission Directive amending Directive 90/388/EEC in order to ensure that telecomÜ munications networks and cable TV networks owned by a single operator are separate legal entities (98/C 71/05) (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 90(3) thereof, Whereas: (1) Pursuant to Commission Directive 90/388/EEC of 28 June 1990 on competition in the markets for telecommunications servicesØ(˛), as last amended by Directive 96/19/ECØ(ˇ), the Member States were required to lift special and exclusive rights for teleÜ communications infrastructures by services and 1 January 1998, subject to additional transition periods for some Member States. In particular, Article 4, as amended by Commission Directive 95/51/ECØ(—), required Member States to "abolish all restrictions on transmission capacity by cable TV networks and allow the use of cable networks for the provision of telecommuniÜ cations services, other than voice telephony’, and to "ensure that interconnection of cable TV networks with is authorised for such purpose, in particular interconÜ nection with leased lines, and that the restrictions on the direct interconnection of cable TV networks by cable TV operators are abolished’. telecommunications network the public supply of the (2) Directive 95/51/EC addressed two problems concerning undertakings to which Member States have granted the right to establish both cable TV and telecommunications networks. First, it stated that these undertakings are in a situation whereby they have no incentive to attract users to the network best suited to the provision of the relevant service. It was pointed out that the introduction of fair competition will often require specific measures that take into account the specific circumstances of the relevant markets. At the time of the adoption of (˛) OJ L 192, 24. 7. 1990, p. 10. (ˇ) OJ L 74, 22. 3. 1996, p. 13. (—) OJ L 256, 26. 10. 1995, p. 49. Secondly, Directive 95/51/EC, the Commission concluded that, given the disparities between Member States, the national authorities were best able to assess which measures were most appropriate, and in particular to judge whether a separation of these activities was the indispensable. Commission concluded that detailed control of cross subsidies and accounting transparency are essential in the early stages of liberalisation of the telecommunications sector. Article 2 of Directive 95/51/EC therefore required Member States to telecommunications ensure particular organisations providing cable TV infrastructures kept separate financial accounts as concerns the provision of public telecommunications networks and cable TV networks as well as their activities as telecommunications service providers. It was also stated that while Member States should at least financial records impose a clear separation of between two activities, full structural separation was preferable. that in systems it would have (3) At the same time the Commission stated that in the absence of the emergence of competing homeÜ to reconsider delivery whether a separation of accounts was sufficient to avoid improper practices and would assess whether such joint provision did not result in a limitation of the potential supply of transmission capacity at the expense of the service providers in the relevant area, or whether further measures were warranted. In this context the third paragraph of Article 2 of Directive 95/51/EC required the Commission to carry out, before 1 January 1998, an overall assessment of the impact, in relation to the aims of that Directive, of the joint provision of cable TV networks and public telecommunications networks through a single operator. (4) This Directive is based on the assessment carried out by the Commission as required by Article 2 of Directive 95/51/EC. In preparing that assessment, two studies were commissioned on the competition implications in telecommunications and multimedia markets of, on the one hand, joint provision of cable and telecommunications networks by a single dominant operator and, on the other, restrictions on the use of telecommunications networks for the C 71/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 7. 3. 98 services. The provision of cable TV studies concluded in particular that the joint ownership of telecommunications cable TV networks networks by a single enterprise, without a high degree of competition in the local access markets, slows down full multimedia the detriment of consumers, service providers and the European economy as a whole. the development infrastructure towards a and to (5) The Commission has adopted a communication on the assessment carried out as required by Directives 95/51/EC and 96/19/ECØ(˛). In its review the Commission found that the optimal development telecommunications and multimedia markets of depends on four factors: service competition, infraÜ structure competition, infrastructure upgrade, as well as other types of innovation. It found that in the Community, the joint provision of telecomÜ munications and cable TV services by a single operator creates an asymmetric starting position for dominant telecommunications operators compared with new entrants. This will act as a significant constraint on the optimal development of telecomÜ munications markets. (6) The Treaty, and in particular Article 90 thereof, entrusts the Commission with the task of ensuring that Member States, in the case of public underÜ special or takings and undertakings enjoying exclusive rights, comply with their obligations under Community law. Pursuant to Article 90(3) the Commission can specify and clarify the obliÜ that gations arising from that Article, and framework, the conditions which are set out necessary to allow the Commission to perform effectively the duty of surveillance imposed upon it by that paragraph. in (7) Most European telecommunications organisations are still StateÜcontrolled companies. In addition, whilst Community law provides for the withdrawal of special and exclusive rights for the provision of teleÜ telecommunications networks and services, communications organisations will continue to rights as defined by Directive enjoy special by Directive as 90/388/EEC, amended 94/46/ECØ(ˇ), beyond the date of full liberalisation, in the area of radio frequencies used for the provision of telecommunications networks and broadcasting transmission capacity. That is because telecommunications organisations continue to enjoy rights to use radio frequencies which they have historically been granted otherwise than according to objective, proportional and non discriminatory regulatory authorisations criteria. Those advantages that strengthen the position of those operators and continue to have a substantial effect on the ability of other undertakings to compete with in infrastructure. telecommunications the area of Therefore those telecommunications operators are undertakings covered by Article 90(1) of the Treaty. telecommunications organisations are the (8) Most Member States have adopted measures granting to the telecommunications organisations special or exclusive rights for the provision of cable television networks. The rights can take the form either of an exclusive licence or of a non exclusive licence where the number of licences is restricted otherwise than according to objective, proportional and non discriminatory criteria. (9) Article 86 of the Treaty prohibits one or more undertakings holding a dominant position from abusing that dominant position within the common market or a substantial part of it. to a (10) Where Member States have granted a special or exclusive right to build and operate cable TV telecommunications organisation networks which is dominant on the market for services using telecomÜ telecommunications munications organisation has no to upgrade both its public narrowband telecommuniÜ cations network or its broadband cable TV network communications to an of network capable delivering at high bandwidth. ("full service voice, data network’) and infrastructure, broadband integrated incentive images that In other words, such an organisation is placed in a situation where it has a conflict of interests because any substantial improvement in either its telecomÜ munications network or its cable TV network may lead to a loss of business for the other network. (˛) OJ C. Ø. Ø. ,. Ø. Ø. , p. Ø. (ˇ) OJ L 268, 19. 10. 1994, p. 15. 7. 3. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 71/25 It would be desirable in those circumstances to separate the ownership of the two networks into two distinct companies since the joint ownership of the networks leads those organisations to delay the communications emergence of new advanced services and thus restricts technical progress at the expense of the users, contrary to Article 90(1) of the Treaty, in conjunction with point (b) of the second paragraph of Article 86. As a minimum, all Member States should, however, ensure that telecommunications organisations which have special or exclusive rights for the provision of cable TV networks operate cable TV networks in a separate legal entity. the special or exclusive right (11) Such a conclusion is reinforced by the following considerations. Where Member States grant to an to undertaking establish same geographical area where it already provides public telecommunications networks, different forms of anti competitive behaviour are to occur unless sufficient transparency of the operations of the undertakings is ensured. cable TV networks likely the in transparent, whereas a legal entities will Notwithstanding the requirements of Community law with regard to accounting separation, some of which only entered into force with the implemenÜ tation of the package of general measures opening up the Community’s telecommunications markets in in most Member States from 1 January 1998, situations where serious conflicts of interest exist as a result of joint ownership, such separation has not provided the necessary safeguards against all forms of anti competitive behaviour. In addition, the sepÜ aration of accounts will only render financial flows more for requirement separate lead to more transÜ parency of assets and costs will facilitate monitoring of the profitability and the management of the cable network operations. The provision of teleÜ communications networks and cable TV networks are related activities. The position of an operator on one of those markets has an impact on its position on the other, and the supervision of its is more difficult. In activities on those markets addition, where a dominant telecommunications organisation has any cable TV interests, this has a discouraging effect on any other company because of the financial strength of the telecommunications operator. Also, the future financial prospects of a cable TV network which has not yet been built are uncertain for a company that is not yet already established on the telecommunications or pay TV services markets. legal separation between Therefore, it is essential that a dominant telecomÜ munications organisation organises its cable TV network activities in such a way that it can be monitored in order to ensure that it does not use its resources so as to abuse its position. During the crucial phase of the full opening of the sector to competition, a the operation of telecommuniÜ the public switched cations network and the cable TV network of the telecommunications organisations is the minimum requirement in order to ensure compliance with Article 90. In order to achieve this transparency, it is necessary that the networks be operated by separate in principle be jointly owned. The requirement of legal separation would therefore be complied with if the cable TV operations of a telecommunications to a fully owned transferred organisation were subsidiary of the telecommunications organisation. legal entities which may, however, (12) The Commission will examine on a case by case it would be compatible with the individual basis whether principle of proportionality to require Member States to take further measures. The decisions to be taken in respect of specific including the cases could provide for measures opening of the cable operator to participation of third parties, or the requirement to sell off that entity altogether. (13) The distribution of audio visual programmes intended for the general public via telecommuniÜ such cations networks, and programmes, will continue to be subject to specific rules adopted by Member States in accordance with Community law and should not, therefore, be subject to the provisions of this Directive. content of the (14) Directive 90/388/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly. (15) Member States should refrain from introducing new measures with the purpose or effect of jeopÜ ardising the aim of this Directive, C 71/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 7. 3. 98 HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 2 Article 1 Article 9 of Directive 90/388/EEC is hereby replaced by the following: Member States shall supply to the Commission, not later than nine months after this Directive has entered into force, such information as will allow the Commission to confirm this Directive has been complied with. that Article 1 of "Article 9 Member States shall ensure that any telecommunications organisation to which they grant special or exclusive rights in the areas of relevant radio frequencies or which they control, which, in a substantial part of the common market, has a dominant position and operates a cable TV network under special or exclusive rights does not do so using the same legal entity as it uses for its public teleÜ communications network. ’ Article 3 This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 4 This Directive is addressed to the Member States. NonÜopposition to a notified concentration (Case No IV/M. 1078 - BP/Hüls) (98/C 71/06) (Text with EEA relevance) On 13 February 1998, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available: - as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page), - in electronic form in the "CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 398M1078. CELEX is the computerised documentation system of European Community law; for more information concerning subscriptions please contact: EURÜOP, Information, Marketing and Public Relations (OP/4B), 2, rue Mercier, LÜ2985 Luxembourg; telephone: (352) 2929 4Ø24 55, fax: (352) 2929 4Ø27 63