COMMON POSITION (EC) No 14/98 adopted by the Council on 12 February 1998 with a view to adopting Directive 98/.../EC of ... amending Directive 95/21/EC concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port state control)
C 91/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 3. 98 COMMON POSITION (EC) No 14/98 adopted by the Council on 12 February 1998 with a view to adopting Directive 98/. /EC of. amending Directive 95/21/EC concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port state control) (98/C 91/02) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 84(2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), IX of November 1993 and made mandatory through the new Chapter the Solas Convention establishes a safety management system applicable both shipboard and on shore by the company responsible for operation of the ship and verified by the administration of the country in which the company conducts its business; Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), (4) Whereas the ISM Code is an essential contribution to maritime safety and to protection of the marine environment in Community waters; Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189c of the Treaty (3), (1) Whereas Article 2(1) of Directive 95/21/EC (4) defines ‘Conventions’ in terms of the Conventions cited in that Article in force at the time of adoption of the Directive; whereas Article 2(2) stipulates that ‘MOU’ means the Memorandum of Understanding on port State control, signed in Paris on 26 January 1982, as it stood at the date of adoption of the Directive; (2) Whereas since the adoption of Directive 95/21/EC, amendments to the Solas 74 Convention, to the Marpol 73/78 Convention and to the STCW 78 Convention have entered into force; whereas the latest amendments to the Paris MOU have entered into force on 14 January 1998; whereas it is appropriate to apply these amendments for the purpose of the Directive; (3) Whereas the International Management Code for the safe operation of ships and for pollution prevention the International Maritime Organisation on 4 (ISM Code) adopted by (1) OJ C 264, 30. 8. 1997, p. 33. (2) OJ C 73, 9. 3. 1998, p. 64. (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 4 December 1997 (OJ C 388, 22. 12. 1997, p. 16), Council common position of 12 February 1998 and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (4) OJ L 157, 7. 7. 1995, p. 1. (5) Whereas the ISM Code enters into force at international level on 1 July 1998 for all passenger ships and for oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers, bulk carriers and cargo high-speed craft with a gross tonnage of 500 tonnes or more; (6) Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 3051/95 of 8 December 1995 on the safety management of roll-on/roll-off passenger ferries (ro-ro ferries) (5) aims at advanced mandatory enforcement of the provisions of the ISM Code to all ro-ro ferries to or from Community ports, regardless of their flag; (7) Whereas delays in implementing the provisions of the ISM Code at international level by companies and administrations would create cause for concern from the point of view of marine safety and protection of the environment; (8) Whereas it is therefore necessary to establish specific Community-wide measures to deal with cases where no ISM certificates are on board; whereas these measures must include detention of all ships without certificates issued pursuant to the ISM Code; (5) OJ L 320, 30. 12. 1995, p. 14. 26. 3. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 91/29 (9) Whereas, however, in the absence of other serious deficiencies warranting detention of the vessel, the Member State concerned should be able to give authorisation to lift the detention order on the ship when this is necessary in order to avoid port congestion; (10) Whereas, in this case, Member States need to take, in conformity with Article 11 of Directive 95/21/EC, well-coordinated measures to ensure that ships which have been authorised to leave port without proper ISM certification are refused access to all ports within the Community until valid certificates have been issued under the ISM Code, without prejudice to paragraph 6 of the said Article; refusal of access (11) Whereas only the detaining Member State can lift the the Community; whereas this State may accept, if it so wishes, any information from another Member State which is deemed to be proof that a ship has valid certificates issued in accordance with the ISM Code, to ports within (12) Whereas it should be possible to adapt Directive 95/21/EC to take account of amendments to the international conventions and the Memorandum of Understanding on port State control mentioned in Article 2 of that Directive by a simplified procedure; whereas the procedure provided for in Article 18 of the said Directive appears the most appropriate for such amendments; whereas to that end Article 19 should be extended, HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 Directive 95/21/EC is hereby amended as follows: 1. Article 2 shall be amended as follows: (a) in point 1, the words ‘in force at the date of adoption of this Directive’ shall be replaced by ‘in force on 1 July 1998’; (b) in point 2, the words ‘as it stands at the date of adoption of this Directive’ shall be replaced by ‘as it stands on 14 January 1998’. 2. The following Article shall be inserted: ‘Article 9a certificate issued in accordance with the International Management Code for the safe operation of ships and for pollution prevention (ISM Code) are missing on board a vessel to which, within the Community, the ISM Code is applicable at the date of the inspection, the competent authority shall ensure that the vessel is detained. of absence the the 2. Notwithstanding documentation referred to in paragraph 1, if the inspection finds no other deficiencies warranting detention the competent authority may lift the detention order in order to avoid port congestion. Whenever such a decision is taken, the competent authority shall immediately inform the competent authorities of the other Member States thereof. 3. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that all ships authorised to leave a port in a Member State under the circumstances referred to in paragraph 2 shall be refused access to all ports in the Community, except, in the situations referred to in Article 11(6), until the owner or operator of the vessel has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the competent authority of the Member State in which detention was ordered, that the ship has valid certificates issued in accordance with the ISM Code. Where deficiencies as referred to in Article 9(2) are found and cannot be rectified in the port of detention, the relevant provisions of Article 11 shall also apply. ’. 3. In Article 19 the following point shall be added: ‘(c) adapt the dates in Article 2 in order to take into account amendments which have entered into force to the international conventions and to the MOU referred to in the said Article with the exception of protocols to such conventions. ’. Article 2 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before 1 July 1998. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. Procedure applicable certificates in the absence of ISM 1. Where the inspection reveals that the copy of the document of compliance or the safety management When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States. C 91/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 3. 98 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of domestic law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive. Article 4 This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Article 3 Done at. This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. For the Council The President 26. 3. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 91/31 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION On 29 July 1997, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Directive 95/21/EC concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control). This proposal was based on Article 84(2) of the Treaty (1). The European Parliament issued its opinion in the first reading on 4 December 1997 (2). The Economic and Social Committee issued its opinion on 10 December 1997 (3). The Parliament approved the Commission proposal without amendment. The Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 189c of the Treaty on 12 February 1998. II. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSAL The purpose of this proposal is to amend Directive 95/21/EC on port State control in order to: — extend port State control to recent amendments to the Marpol, SOLAS and STCW Conventions, — oblige Member States to ensure that ships entering their ports comply with the International Management Code for the safe operation of ships and for pollution prevention (ISM Code) (4), — establish specific detention procedures for ships not carrying ISM certificates on board, taking account of the fact that a considerable number of companies and ships will not have ISM certificates by the entry into force of the ISM Code on 1 July 1998, — extend the scope of the comitology procedure. III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION The common position adopted by the Council corresponds largely to the Commission proposal. The draft Directive amends the dates of reference contained in points 1 and 2 of Article 2 (‘definitions’) of Directive 95/21/EC in order to cover recent amendments of certain international conventions (point 1) and of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and port State control (point 2). (1) OJ C 264, 30. 8. 1997, p. 33. (2) OJ C 388, 22. 12. 1997, p. 16. (3) OJ C 73, 9. 3. 1997, p. 64. (4) The ISM Code requires ships to have on board a copy of the ‘document of compliance’, in which the flag State approves the safety management system of the company, as well as a ‘safety management certificate’, in which the flag State approves the safety management system of the ship. C 91/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26. 3. 98 Furthermore, a new Article 9a was inserted in order to: — ensure that vessels which are not able to present a ‘document of compliance’ or the ‘safety management certificate’ issued in accordance with the ISM Code are detained (paragraph 1), — enable Member States to lift such a detention order, provided that no other deficiencies warranting detention have been found, and that this measure is necessary in order to avoid port congestion (paragraph 2), — ensure that vessels which have been allowed to leave a port in accordance with paragraph 2 are, in principle, refused access to all Community ports until they are able to prove compliance with the ISM Code (paragraph 3). Moreover, the draft Directive extends the scope of the Committee procedure laid down in Article 19(b), which at present merely covers adaptations of the technical Annexes to the Directive in the light of future amendments of the instruments mentioned in Article 2, points 1 and 2, so that the Committee may also amend the dates specified in those points. IV. AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT In its first reading on 4 December 1997, the European Parliament did not adopt any amendments to the Commission proposal. V. THE COUNCIL’S AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL PREAMBLE The Council redrafted the preamble in the light of the amendments to the Commission’s original proposal. Apart from several editorial changes, the Council: — completed recitals 1 and 2 in order to indicate that Directive 95/21/EC should also be adapted in the light of recent amendments to the Paris MOU, — modified recital 9 in order to clarify that the need to avoid port congestion is the only reason that justifies the lifting of a detention order, — inserted new recitals 10 and 11 in order to clarify the rights and obligations of Member States with regard to the lifting of detention orders and the subsequent refusal of access to all Community ports until the vessels concerned can prove compliance with the ISM Code. ARTICLES The Council agreed to amend the Commission proposal as follows: Article 1. 1. b (amendment of Article 2(2) of Directive 95/21/EC) The Council introduced a new Article 1. 1. b in order to update the definition of the Paris MOU contained in Article 2(2) of Directive 95/21/EC. By replacing the reference to the ‘date of adoption of this Directive’ with ‘as it stands on 14 January 1998’, the Council took into account the amendments to the Paris MOU which entered into force after the date of adoption of Directive 95/21/EC. 26. 3. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 91/33 Article 1. 2 (new Article 9a) In paragraph 1, the Council replaced ‘certificate’ by ‘safety management certificate’ in order to ensure consistency with the language used in the ISM Code. Moreover, the Council inserted the words ‘on board a vessel to which, within the European Community, the ISM Code is applicable at the date of the inspection’ in order to avoid any ambiguity with regard to the scope of application of this Directive. In paragraph 2, the Council replaced ‘may authorise the ship to leave port’ by ‘may lift the detention order’ in order to ensure consistency with the language used in Article 9(2) of Directive 95/21/EC. Moreover, the Council added the words ‘in order to avoid port congestion’ so as to introduce a clear criterion on the basis of which the derogation from the general rule to detain a vessel can be granted. In paragraph 3, the Council: — inserted the words ‘except in the situations referred to in Article 11(6)’ in order to clarify that vessels may be permitted access to a specific port in the Community ‘in the event of force majeure or overriding safety considerations, or to reduce or minimise the risk of pollution or to have deficiencies rectified’, — replaced ‘to the satisfaction of the Member State’ by ‘to the satisfaction of the competent authority of the Member State’ in order to ensure consistency with the language used in Article 11(6) of Directive 95/21/EC, — added a new sentence in order to clarify that, under the specific circumstances outlined in Article 11 of Directive 95/21/EC, a vessel which, in principle, should be refused access to all ports in the Community, may be allowed to proceed to the nearest appropriate repair yard available. Article 1. 3 (Amendment to Article 19 of Directive 95/21/EC) The Council replaced the paragraph contained in the Commission proposal by a new text in order to define more narrowly the powers granted to the Committee procedure in the event of subsequent amendments to the international conventions and to the Memorandum of Understanding referred to in Article 2 of Directive 95/21/EC