REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON EXPERIENCE GAINED FROM THE SECOND BASIC STATISTICAL SURVEY OF AREAS UNDER VINES CONDUCTED BY THE MEMBER STATES pursuant to Council Regulation 357/79/EEC of 05.02.1979
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 27. 02. 1997 COM(97) 75 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON EXPERIENCE GAINED FROM THE SECOND BASIG STATISTICAL SURVEY OF AREAS UNDER VINES CONDUCTED BY THE MEMBER STATES pursuant to CouncU Regulation 357/79/EEC of 05. 02. 1979 I. INTRODUCTION The system of surveys of areas under vines established by the basic Regulation (Council Regulation 357/79) and later amendments (cf. annex 1) is designed to assess the situation and development of the wine market in the Community, there being two types of survey: basic surveys, carried out every ten years, covering the structure of vineyards and vines and providing detailed information on all the areas in question (wine grapes, table grapes, grapes for drying, stock for vegetative propagation) and thus show the potential in viticultural products; annual intermediate surveys, less detailed, designed to update the information on wine grape growing and record the changes in the surface area involved (through grubbing up, new planting or replanting) and the related production in order to follow the trend in wine production potential and the supply on the market The present report refers to the results of the second basic survey (the first being carried out in 1979) in the seven Member States concerned, viz. those whose surface area under open-air vines is greater than 500 ha1 : Germany, Spain, France, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg and Portugal. H. METHODOLOGY USED In order to guarantee statistical reliability and the comparability of the data produced by the Community surveys, the methodological rules used for them have to be harmonized for all the Member States concerned Although the situation reflected by the survey method table (Annex II) can be considered generally satisfactory in respect of harmonization of the definition of the characteristics (despite some discrepancies), it also shows the non-harmonization of survey dates. In fact, and despite the need for synchronising dates of the basic surveys as originally planned, this matter is unresolved. The first survey already covered two different periods but the situation has become even more complex for the second survey since three periods are involved While the period laid down in Regulation 357/79 for carrying out the survey, viz. 1989, and the reference period (the situation as of 1 September 1989) have been respected by Germany, Spain, Greece, Portugal and Luxembourg, the survey took place in 1988 (covering the situation as of 1 September 1988) in France and in 1990/91 (covering the situation as of 1 September 1990) in Italy. m. STRUCTURE OF THE SURVEY This has not been modified since the beginning. The information gives an overall view of the viticulture in the Community and an insight into the sector in each of the 191 geographical unities defined in the base regulation. The information covers the number of holdings and what they grow: firstly, on the share of the area under vines in the overall agricultural area utilized and secondly, on viticultural areas by purpose (grapes for VQPRD and other wines, table grapes, grapes for drying, stock for vegetative propagation). All these data are broken down into a dozen viticultural classes. According lo Article 1 ofKcgulaiion No. 357/79 In addition, the data on grapes for wine are collected by variety1 and by age class. IV. RESULTS 1. Transmission of results Most countries respected the deadlines, except France, Italy and Luxembourg, which caused major delays in the transmission of results. Adherence to the deadline ( fifteen months after the survey date at the latest) by all the Member States therefore appears the main subject for harmonization since delays by any of them can in fact jeopardize the value of the surveys, this being to provide users with information on the sector as early as possible. 2. Processing of results After the tabular data had been received by from the Member State, Eurostat validated them, this procedure involving a series of intra- and inter-tabular checks. At the end of this procedure, a certain number of corrections had to be made to the original data to get rid of anomalies and render them acceptable. 3. Brief presentation of results Now that a set of information taken from the two basic surveys is available, it seems more interesting to analyse the data from the second survey in terms of their relative "weight" by comparing them with those from the first, then to restrict analysis to their absolute weight A comparative and detailed study of all the statistics is in'hand This report will be restricted to revealing the general features of the structural modifications that have occurred in the Community winegrowing areas during the period between the basic surveys. The results given in the tables to annex III are briefly analysed as follows: at Community level (EUR 10 and EUR 12), modifications are measured by three physical characteristics: number of vineyards, their utilized agricultural area and the total winegrowing area; at country level, the trend in the main winegrowing areas in respect of the growing of wine grapes (broken down into VQPRD and other wines) and table grapes. The names of grape varieties are not harmonized at Community level. 3 3. 1. At Community level 3. 1. 1. Comparison of data for Eur 10 T1979)1 and EUR 10 (1989) (table 1. 1 - annex IIP At EUR 10 level, i. e. the five countries (Germany, France, Greece, Italy and Luxembourg) which carried out the two basic surveys, there has been a structural reduction in the viticultural sector, particularly the number of vineyards, (-30%) and the UAA (-27. 3%), the rate of decrease of the total wine-growing area being 14. 5%. This trend is the same (same rates of decrease) as that observed for wine-grape vineyards since this sub-seaor represents virtually the entire sector (its "weight"in area terms being 92. 5% of the total viticultural area in 1989). The "VQPRD" have progressed (from 33% in 1979 to 39. 5% in 1989 of total viticultural area) and "other wines" maintain a dominant position despite a clear regression (from 58. 6% in 1979 to 52. 9% in 1989 of total viticultural area). Trend in the main surface areas under cultivation 2500000-r 2000000 1500000 x 1000000 4- 500000 + (1979) EUR 10 B(1989)EUR10 Table grape 3. 1. 2 Comparison of data for EUR 10 H979^ and EUR 12 n989^ (Table 1. 2 - Annex ITO If the information from the first survey is compared with that of the second at Eur 12 level (the five countries mentioned in 3. 1. 1 plus Spain and Portugal), one sees that the accession of the two Mediterranean countries has expanded the wine-growing sector in structural terms. There is an upward trend in the physical characteristics considered (+9% for vineyards; +21% AAU and +41. 6% of total viticultural area which was 3 425 127 ha in 1989). The dales on which the surveys were carried out mean that the reference to the period 79-89 is not absolutely correct for all five countries: it is so for Germany and Luxembourg but the period of observation for France was 79-88, for Italy 82-90 and for Greece 83-89. This expansion is mainly explained by the development of the area under wine grapes (rate of variation + 44. 9%) which, as in EUR 10 represents almost the entire sector (93. 7% of the total viticultural area). One should note the importance that the letters VQPRD have gained in the Community of twelve, particularly in terms of wine-growing area (+78. 4% over 1979). The "other wines" still, however, retain first place in land utilization. Trend in the main viticultural areas 3500000 T 3000000 (1S79)EUR10 CD (1989) EUR 12 Total Wine- grape. Total Quality wines p. s. r Other wines Table grape 3. 2 At country level (Table II. 1 and II. 2 and II. 3 - Annex IIP The most significant changes in the period 1979-1989 are particularly: The decline in areas (wine grapes, table grapes) in Italy, France and Greece with the exception of VQPRD in France; the first two countries are responsible for the decline in overall viticultural area at the EUR 10 level mentioned in 3. 1. 1, owing to their large weight (88% of total area in 1979); A slight increase in the wine-growing area in Germany and Luxembourg, though their weight at EUR 10 level is virtually negligible; The accession of Spain and Portugal which has led to a notable increase in all the Community viticultural areas and also led to changes in the relative importance of countries in terms of surface area under vines. In fact, in the enlarged Community, Spain occupies the first place (1 091 316 ha or 31. 9% of the Community total) which was held by Italy in 1979. France still occupies the second place (26. 9%) closely followed by Italy (26. 4%), these three countries representing 85% of the Community total in 1989. Share of areas under vines by country 1979 1. 000 Ha 3425. 1 2067. 1 ^ 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 900000 1000000 1900000 2000000 2900000 3000000 3900000 4. Consistency of the survey system Since a complete cycle of viticultural surveys, which begins and ends with a basic survey, has now been carried out by the five Member States concerned, it is legitimate to judge the validity of the system. This involves seeing whether one can monitor the trend in the area under wine grapes by comparing that in the second survey to that resulting from the algebraic calculation from the first survey and the intervening changes (plantings and grubbing-up). If the system is consistent, the difference between the two surface areas should be 0. In accordance with the historical series of data on the area under wine grapes for the five countries (Tables III. l to DI. 5 Annex HI) and despite the different methodologies used for the collection of the base data and annual data (the first by survey, the second mainly from administrative documents), the data turn out to be consistent for Germany, France and Luxembourg. On the other hand, methodological improvements seem to be necessary in Italy and Greece to achieve this consistency. V. CONCLUSIONS Now that the second base survey on viticultural areas has been concluded, and before the scheduled reform of the sector has consequences for the statistical branches in question and thus on the statistical structure in effect, the comments that can be made on the two aspects are as follows: 1. On the base surveys The subject matter of these surveys, i. e. the amount of information on the Community viticultural structure appears adapted to user requirements at the moment and thus allows the potential of the sector to be assessed. Nevertheless, one must stress that information on the varieties of vine, if they are to be of any real value, must be based on a harmonized list and a study of variety names must obviously be carried out beforehand. As regards the quality of the information derived from the base surveys, the aspects "harmonization" and "up-to-date status" must be improved The objective must be to harmonize the date the surveys are carried out in order to render the date truly comparable and meet the deadline for communicating the data by all the Member States. Relating to the survey system At this stage, and over and beyond the required methodological improvements referred to above and the data consistency aspect (cf. IV. 4), the system Can be considered as a viable statistical tool which fulfils the objective i. e. makes it possible to monitor the wine-growing market It should be noted that the system has an adequate legal basis. This was updated by the amendment to Regulation 357/79 which was made last year to enable the administrative source "wine-growing register" to be made for the intermediate surveys. The intention of this amendment was to ease the burden on the Member States who have such a register which is updated at national level or for certain regions, though retain the purpose of the basic surveys as the sole statistical source for the basic data. ANNEX I tf Community legislation on statistical surveys of areas under vines 1. CouncU Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 of 5 February 1979 (OJ L 54 of 5 March 1979. p. 124), as amended by: - Act of Accession (Greece) (OJ L 291 of 19 November 1979, p. 89, paragraph H. 7, and p. 127, paragraph E. 1) - CouncU Regulation (EEC) No 1992/80 of 22 July 1980 (OJ L 195 of 29 July 1980, p. 10) - CouncU Regulation (EEC) No 3719/81 of 21 December 1981 (OJ L 373 of 29 December 1981) - CouncU Regulation (EEC) No 490/86 of 23 February 1986 (OJ L 54 of 19 March 1986, p. 21) - CouncU Regulation (EEC) No 3205/93 of 16 November 1993 (OJ L 289 of 24 November 1993,p. 4) 2. 3. CouncU Decision 89/287/EEC of 17 April 1989 (OJ L 112 of 25 April 1989, p. 18) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 991/79 of 17 May 1979 (OJ L 129 of 28 May 1979, p. l), as amended by: - Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2802/85 of 7 October 1985 (OJ L 265 of 8 October 1985, p. 15) 4. Commission Decision 79/491/EEC of 17 may 1979 (OJ L 129 of 28 May 1979), as amended by: - Commission Decision 85/620/EEC of 13 December 1985 (OJ L 379 of 31 december 1985, p. l) 5. 6. 7. Commission Decision 80/763/EEC of 8 July 1980 (OJ L 213 of 16 August 1980, p. 26) Commission Decision 80/764/EEC of 8 July 1980 (OJ L 213 of 16 August 1980) Commission Decision 80/765/EEC of 8 July 1980 (OJ L 213 of 16 August 1980, p. 34), as amended by: - Commission Decision 85/621/EEC of 13 december 1985 (OJ L 379 of 31 December 1985, p. 12) 3 ANNEX H 1 o C O U N C IL R E G U L A T I ON 357/79 GERMANY GREECE SPAIN December 1989 April 1990 Autumn 1989 Autumn 1989 1988/1989 1988/1989 1988/1989 Not applicable Exhaustive - by interview Not applicable Sample survey, two-phase stratification, by interview Not applicable Exhaustive - by interview In 1989 or at latest before 1 April 1990 1988/1989 Derogations pursuant to Council Decision 89/287:1987/88 - France, 1989/1990 - Italy Not applicable Exhaustive or based on random sampling. In the latter case the sampling error "at the 68% confidence level shall be of the order of 1% at most" for the total area under vines, broken down by normal production use (quality wines psr, other wines, table grapes, grapes to be dried etc. ) All holdings having a cultivated area under vines normally intended for the production for sale of grapes, grape must, wine or vegetative propagation material for vines. 1. 1 Survey period 1. 2 Reference winegrowing year 13 Pilot surveys 1. 4 Type of survey 2. Survey cover Viticultural holdings included in the survey - survey threshold 3. Characteristics of the survey Criteria adopted : 3. 1 To subdivide varieties into "quality wines psr" or "other wines": 3. 2 To record the varieties with a dual use1 A minimum of 10 ares under vines A minimum of 10 ares - 5 arres for nurseries All holdings with a total area S 0. 1 ha Not applicable Not applicable since there are only "quality wines psr" varieties Varieties for "quality wines psr" and the regions in which they are produced are defined by law. "Other wines" are the other varieties of grape used for wine- making Vines are classified on the basis of the use to be made of them, determined by the area Not applicable Based on the criterion fixed by the winegrower Based on the criterion fixed by the winegrower Varieties which are classified simultaneously as wine grape varieties and table grape varieties are recorded according to their predominant use in the geographical units concerned 3. 3 To measure the area Not applicable under vines devoted to: According to winegrower's declarations According to winegrower's declarations According to winegrower's declarations - specialised production2 - mixed production3 - associated planting in rows - dispersed vines 3. 4 To determine the age of the vines: 3. 5 To determine yield classes The age of the vines is calculated from the wine-growing year in which they were planted or grafted The Member States concerned must subdivide the areas under the vines cultivated with wine grape varieties into yield classes based upon the main yield per hcclare All the areas were intended for the production of "quality wines psr" Based on the main use of the area Total area of the plot if vines are the main crop Not recorded As reported by the wine grower Planting year Pro-rata distribution on the basis of the associated crops Are taken into account as a proportion in the total area under vines (not significant) As reported by the wine grower Yield classes have been based on the ten year average Yield classes have been determined on the basis of the wine grower's declarations Yield classes have been determined on the basis of the 1989 harvest as reported by the wine grower the case of varieties which are classified simultaneously as wine grape varieties and table grape varieties "holding with only one type of vine cultivation (e. g. quality wines psr or Ubtc grapes etc. ) snn holding with several types of grape production. The types of production can be as follows: grapes for quality wines psr and other wines, table grapes, grapes to be dried and vegetative propagation nulcrial for vines FRANCE ITALY LUXEMBOURG PORTUGAL Winter 1 9 8 8- 1989 October 1 9 9 0- April 1991 September 1989 December 1989 - July 1990 1987/1988 1989/1990 1988/1989 1988/1989 Not applicable Exhaustive - by interview November 1989 Exhaustive - by interview Not applicable Exhaustive - by interview May 1989 Exhaustive - by interview All holdings within the meaning of the Regulation. Note that a holding is included in the survey if its UAA is 1 ha or where there are 20 ares under ordinary vines, 10 ares under vines for the production of quality wines psr or 5 ares for the production of champagne All holdings within the meaning of the Regulation All holdings within the meaning of the Regulation All holdings within the meaning of the Regulation " Vines are classified according to their use based on the vineyard terrain (vintage or non-vintage areas of production) and vine varieties (varieties included or not included in the official definition of the vintage) Varieties for "quality wines psr" and the regions in which they are cultivated are defined by legislation. The varieties "other wines" are other grape varieties for winemaking Not applicable as there are only varieties for "quality wines psr" All the European varieties in specified regions are considered as varieties for quality wines psr On the basis of the use by the winegrower recorded According to the criteria set out in the legislation Not applicable All varieties were recorded as winegrape varieties According to the winegrower's declarations According to the winegrower's declarations According to the use made of the areas On the basis of homogeneous parcels (variety, nature of production, planting density) All the areas are used for the production of "quality wines psr" Total area of the plot if vines are the main crop Associated crops are added to specialized crops in terms of the proportion of the area they actually occupy on a prorata basis Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Year of planting or grafting Year of planting or grafting Year of planting Prorata distribution where the planting density is not the normal one. Otherwise the whole area is considered as being under vines. Dispersed vines have been considered in the main specified regions: lm2/vine As reported by the wine grower Yields are not recorded in the basic survey but in the annual harvest declarations Yields are not recorded in the basic survey but later on from declarations about the production of grapes Yield classes have been based upon the average over 10 years Yield classes have been based on the average yield per "Concelho" s\L ANNEX III ^ i> Table 1. 1 Changes in the number of holdings, cultivated area under vines and agricultural area in use ( A. A. ) broken down by type of production. Type of production Unit TOTAL Holdings AA Area under vine WINE-GRAPE, TOTAL Holdings AA Area under vine QUALITY WINES p. s. r Holdings AA Area under vine OTHER WINES Holdings AA Area under vine OF WHICH FOR SPIRITS Holdings AA Area under vine TABLE-GRAPE Holdings AA Area under vine AREA NOT YET GRAFTED Holdings AA Area under vine VINES FOR MATERIAL PROPAG. NURSERIES Holdings AA Area under vine PARENT VINES Holdings AA Area under vine GRAPES FOR DRYING Holdings AA Area under vine N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha EUR 10 Total 1989 1368234 8657279 2067113 1301466 8406770 1911178 290636 2555736 816801 1078378 6796797 1094377 10355 298104 80391 100988 607395 103142 3146 19459 1944 3926 44000 2730 1540 28225 3254 53138 225083 44866 % chang« 1979-1989 -30. 1 -27. 3 -14. 5 -30. 1 -27. 6 -13. 7 -20. 0 -11. 3 2. 5 -32. 2 -31. 4 -22. 8 -39. 7 -24. 6 -16. 6 -40. 1 -36. 3 -19. 3 -61. 3 -75. 2 -55. 4 -62. 7 -39. 8 -29. 7 -81. 6 -58. 9 -50. 2 -22. 9 -16. 7 -25. 5 Total 1979 1956602 11906950 2418072 1862081 11607264 2215215 363403 2880508 797087 1590057 9912664 1418129 17167 395623 96375 168544 953566 127848 8134 7f;538 4354 10518 73148 3881 8352 68693 6530 68879 270136 60245 0 H Table 1. 2 Changes in the number of holdings, cultivated area under vines and agricultural area in use ( A. A. of production. broken down by type EUR 12 Total 1989 2132400 14406099 3425127 2036832 14015573 3209978 552086 4455703 1422277 1585508 10628963 1787701 10355 298104 80391 133311 846021 145704 11532 129669 11716 4636 52976 3373 2168 36610 4765 57105 239225 49592 % change 1979-1989 9. 0 21. 0 41. 6 9. 4 20. 7 44. 9 51. 9 54. 7 78. 4 -0. 3 7. 2 26. 1 -39. 7 -24. 6 -16. 6 -20. 9 -11. 3 14. 0 41. 8 65. 1 169. 1 -55. 9 -27. 6 -13. 1 -74. 0 -46. 7 -27. 0 -17. 1 -11. 4 -17. 7 Type of production Unit TOTAL Holdings AA Area under vine WINE-GRAPE, TOTAL Holdings AA Area under vine QUALITY WINES p. s. r Holdings AA Area under vine OTHER WINES Holdings AA Area under vine OF WHICH FOR SPIRITS Holdings AA Area under vine TABLE-GRAPE Holdings AA Area under vine AREA NOT YET GRAFTED Holdings AA Area under vine VINES FOR MATERIAL PROPAG. NURSERIES Holdings AA Area under vine PARENT VINES Holdings AA Area under vine GRAPES FOR DRYING Holdings AA Area under vine N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha N° ha ha EUR 10 Total 1979 1956602 11906950 2418072 1862081 11607264 2215215 363403 2880508 797087 1590057 9912664 1418129 17167 395623 96375 168544 953566 127848 8134 78538 4354 10518 73148 3881 8352 68693 6530 68879 270136 60245 A? Table 11. 1 MAIN AREAS UNDER VINES IN 1979 AND 1989 (HA) AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES TOTAL WINE GRAPES (TOTAL) QUALITY WINE P. S. R OTHER WINES TABLE GRAPES 6> 1979 1989 1979 1989 1979 1989 T979 1989 1979 1989 D EL E F 94202 173657 1033332 I 1115608 1273 L P 102357 137669 1091316 920311 905425 1351 266699 93858 90140 998715 1031229 1273 102028 74147 1043567 899499 834153 1351 255233 93858 31028 464931 205997 1273 102028 13300 506437 509513 190609 1351 99040 59112 533785 825232 60848 537130 389986 643544 156194 22948 29562 75338 18276 33940 18160 66706 8621 D EL E F I L P EUR 10 2418072 EUR 12 2067113 3425128 2215215 1911178 3209978 797087 816801 1422277 1418129 1094377 1787701 127848 103142 EUR 10 145703 EUR 12 Table 11. 2 MAIN AREAS UNDER VINES IN 1979 AND 1989 (%) AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES AREA UNDER VINES TOTAL WINE GRAPES (TOTAL) QUALITY WINE P. S. R OTHER WINES TABLE GRAPES P 1979 1989 1979 1989 1979 1989 1979 1989 1979 1989 3. 90 7. 18 42. 73 46. 14 0. 05 D EL E F I L P EUR 10 EUR 12 100. 0 2. 99 4. 02 31. 86 26. 87 26. 43 0. 04 7. 79 60. 4 100. 0 4. 24 4. 07 45. 08 46. 55 0. 06 100. 0 3. 18 2. 31 32. 51 28. 02 25. 99 0. 04 7. 95 59. 5 100. 0 11. 78 3. 89 58. 33 25. 84 0. 16 100. 0 7. 17 0. 94 35. 61 35. 82 13. 40 0. 09 6. 96 57. 4 100. 0 4. 17 37. 64 58. 19 100. 0 3. 40 30. 05 21. 81 36. 00 8. 74 61. 2 100. 0 17. 95 23. 12 58. 93 12. 54 23. 29 12. 46 45. 78 5. 92 D EL E F I L P 100. 0 70. 8 100. 0 EUR 10 EUR 12 v3 Table 11. 3 MAIN AREAS UNDER VINES, RATES OF VARIATION 1979/1989 (%) AREA UNDER AREA UNDER AREA UNDER AREA UNDER AREA UNDER VINES TOTAL 8. 7 -20. 7 -10. 9 -18. 8 6. 1 VINES VINES VINES VINES WINE GRAPES QUALITY WINE OTHER WINES TABLE GRAPES TOTAL 8. 7 -17. 7 -9. 9 -19. 1 6. 1 P. S. R 8. 7 -57. 1 9. 6 -7. 5 6. 1 2. 9 -26. 9 -22 -20. 4 -38. 6 -11. 5 -14. 5 •13. 7 2. 5 -22. 8 •19. 3 D EL E F I L P EUR 10 EUR 12 D EL E F I L P EUR 10 EUR 12 Table III. 1 Development of area under wine-grapes GERMANY Annual data Wine-growing Wine-growing Plantings Replantings Grubbing up Wine-growing Area under area wine grapes wine grapes second basic survey calculated* | (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (2)-(7) % (6X7) % area wine grapes area wine first basic survey (1) grapes (2) 93858 Unit: Ha Difference in area 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 94669 774 3869 3833 95612 1020 4313 4391 96878 980 3659 3373 98386 1068 99608 99806 99303 99335 99720 885 301 91 75 71 4024 3780 4172 3737 4057 3725 3588 3442 4278 4330 4100 3411 94668 95611 96878 98382 99609 99803 99304 99335 99720 99713 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 102023 2310 2. 26 Area under wine grapes calculated for year n: area under wine grapes (year n-l) + (plantings + replantings + grubbing) (year n). Table III. 2 Development of area under wine-grapes FRANCE Annual data Unit: Ha Wine-growing Wine-growing Plantings Replantings Grubbing up Wine-growing Area under Difference in area area wine grapes area wine first basic survey (1) grapes (2) 9987191 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (2X7) % (6X7) % area wine grapes wine grapes • second basic survey calculated" | 978003 5382 32548 58795 977854 149 0. 02 960636 3060 17228 37655 954397 3427 17540 27206 960636 954397 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 947630 4004 19983 30684 947700 -70 -0. 01 940029 3048 15386 26108 939956 73 0. 01 927718 2382 13685 28378 923637 3439 17535 25055 927718 923637 911755 1442 18257 31581 899499 911755 0 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -12256 -1. 36 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 ft Area under wine grapes calculated for year n: area under wine grapes (year n-l) + (plantings + replantings + grubbing) (year n). Table III. 3 Development of area under wine-grapes ELLAS Annual data Wine-growing Wine-growing Plantings Replantings Grubbing up Wine-growing Area under area wine grapes wine grapes second basic survey calculated" | Unit: Ha Difference in area " (2)-(7) % (6X7) % (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) area wine grapes area wine first basic survey (1) grapes (2) 90144 89319 1134 89764 1126 85428 1008 87146 1025 82147 81721 752 798 (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) 1647 1239 1616 2057 1560 1511 89631 -312 -0. 35 89206 558 0. 62 89156 -3728 -4. 36 84396 2750 3. 16 86338 -4191 -5. 10 74147 81434 86357 287 0. 35 -12210 -16. 47 (\j 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 " Area under wine grapes calculated for year n: area under wine grapes (year n-l) + (plantings + replantings + grubbing) (year n). (a) These data are included in column (3) Table III. 4 Development of area under wine-grapes ITALIA Annual data Wine-growing Wine-growing Plantings Replantings Grubbing up Wine-growing Area under area wine grapes wine grapes second basic survey calculated" ( (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (2)-(7) % (6X7) % area wine grapes first basic survey (1) area wine grapes (2) 1031229 Unit: Ha Difference in area 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 962801(a) 7516 13094 37046 1014793 -51992 -5. 40 942689(a) 3594 6337 30043 929648(a) 2188 8865 24094 918530(a) 2606 5953 19677 909574(a) 2860 6975 18791 898080(a) 780 8057 20331 942689 929648 918530 909574 898080 884607(a) 1098 7951 22522 834153 884607 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -50454 -6. 05 (b) ' Area under wine grapes calculated for year n: area under wine grapes (year n-l) + (plantings + replantings + grubbing) (year n). (a) Surface area calculated at Eurostat (b) Cumulative discrepancy between basic surveys: -12,3% Table III. 5 Development of area under wine-grapes LUXEMBOURG Annual data Wine-growing Wine-growing Plantings Replantings Grubbing up Wine-growing Area under area wine grapes wine grapes second basic survey calculated" | (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (2)-(7) % (6X7) % area wine grapes area wine first basic survey (1) grapes (2) 1273 Unit: Ha Difference in area 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1283 1313 1309 1306 1334 1322 1318 1326 1346 1351 7 5 4 8 20 0 1 0 2 0 76 72 39 35 45 28 58 40 39 25 73 47 47 46 37 40 63 32 21 20 1283 1313 1309 1306 1334 1322 1318 1326 1346 1351 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1351 0. 00 Area under wine grapes calculated for year n: area under wine grapes (year n-l) + (plantings + replantings + grubbing) (year n). ISSN 0254-1475 COM(97) 75 final DOCUMENTS EN 17 03 Catalogue number : CB-CO-97-067-EN-C ISBN 92-78-16241-8 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg ^ V