WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2428/97 by Claude DESAMA to the Commission. European subsidies for training people on minimum income benefit in Belgium
C 76/110 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 11. 3. 98 Answer given by Sir Leon Brittan on behalf of the Commission (4 September 1997) The decision concerning the arms embargo against China was taken within the framework of European political cooperation. Implementation falls in the first instance to Member States and to the General Affairs Council. The information at the disposal of the Commission regarding the embargo is confidential, and its disclosure can only be authorised by the Member States. (98/C 76/214) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2428/97 by Claude Desama (PSE) to the Commission (11 July 1997) Subject: European subsidies for training people on minimum income benefit in Belgium On 23 June the newspaper Le Soir published an article claiming that the TOK-EFD is amassing European subsidies in the north of Belgium. It described enormous imbalances in the allocation of European subsidies for training people on minimum income support, to the benefit of Flemish public social welfare centres. Despite the fact that there are more people on minimum income benefit in Wallonia (48%, compared with 36. 6% in Flanders in 1997), over 80% of European subsidies go to Flemish public social welfare centres. This imbalance has persisted since 1988, the date when the non-profit-making association TOK-EFD (Employment and Training for the Disadvantaged) was set up. The association was set up by Mrs Miet Smet, the Belgian Employment Minister. Former members of her office got it under way and it remained exclusively Flemish until 1991. There are currently 57 people on the board of directors: three institutional representatives (including the Ministry of Employment), three representatives of the Brussels public social welfare centre, five from the Walloon public social welfare centre and 45 from the Flemish. Will the Commission investigate this flagrant imbalance and, if irregularities are established, will it take measures to ensure a fair allocation of funding? Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (11 September 1997) The Commission is aware of the concerns raised by the Honourable Member regarding possible unequal distribution of the finances managed by TOK-EFDí, the non governmental organization (NGO) promoter managing the objective 3 operational programme of the European social fund, under the framework established by the federal ministry of Labour and Employment. In considering this matter, two particular points need to be borne in mind. First, Hainaut is an objective 1 region and is not eligible for funding through the federal programme for objective 3. This has an impact on the geographical distribution figures for objective 3. Second, no formal requests for funding from the public centres for social aid (CPAS) of Wallonia were refused by TOK-EFD prior to 1996. In the monitoring committee of December 1996, the Commission learned of a refusal and arranged a meeting with the management of TOK-EFD. The subject was also added to the agenda of the next meeting of the monitoring committee for the federal operational programme. At both meetings the Commission representative expressed concern at the composition of the administrative council insofar as this might prejudice a balanced section of projects. The federal ministry for Labour and Employment and the management of TOK-EFD have undertaken to look at possible reforms to guarantee the equal treatment of all cases. In the framework of the mid-term review of the Belgian federal operational programme, the monitoring committee has requested that additional resources be made available as a matter of priority to redress the geographical balance and avoid interrupting the good work being carried out by the Flemish CPAS. The Commission will continue to monitor this problem