{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2444, "word_count": 436, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9659000039100647], "ccnet_perplexity": [1164.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
here is lhe deceit which is the leading game of the whgs in the South, where protection as a sub stantive power, IS not yet fully confessed popular whig doctrine. They are afraid of declar- ing themselves protectionists directly. But they are for "revenue tariff with discriminations for protection," employing the terms which describe the viewA of large portion of the democratic party, but with ihe purpose of making the discrmina'lons on different principle aad for different obecls, with the main direct purposes of only dIsposng of lhe rates oproteclon as not to let in enough of the pro- l teced aricles as to produce an excess of revenue beyond the public expenditures.

 Another opportunity W i'll be taken to speak more at large upon the points o s4ne in thus matter, both here and elsewhere, and the real stae of the contro- versy which IS confused by the artGul use of terms and the partizan reference to names instead o facts and principles Our reference to Col Dunn's cond tana pledge to go for the reduction of ihe tar ii1, was meant 10 show that in terms, the whg can didale is willing to he supposed friendly to the 'srevenue princlple' supported by the bulk of tho democratic party, and was attempting in the countr, to encourage the opinion that he might vote for lh, reduction to the "reyehne" point, of the Evorle tar iA of 1922 which was lately pronounced by his par ty 10 he perfect in all it's parts. We never real, thought that he or his party would consent to tn, pr, yalence of the req democratic view, until public opinion had compelled them to n submsson, whel u is not unlikely that they would cover their deieu by new versions of the old explanations that il IS on Iy natural change of position to suit new circun stances and reference 10 heiI present vague prcfes sions of opinions, proofs that they were always 0 the triumphant democratic opinion

 The repeal of the tariff of lsl2, or, the worc repeal be objected to, such modification as vii change it's prominent features and make ii really measure for 'revenue," arranged revenue prnci pies as well as intended to raise "Ieyenue," IS leading question in the nniilcs nf Inc day O." r" slion cannot he mistaken. We sh'll take pains l state and support it all occasions but il is too i'm portant matter to be introduced with any sa>iac ton at the close of an artice. intended merely l. , clear away some of the conlusions and misappre hensioa in the Advertiser.