Daniel Mcleod

 vs. Schooner Duane. Same

 vs. Schooner RreerWOod
{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 793, "word_count": 143, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8740000128746033], "ccnet_perplexity": [1208.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
ny VIRTUE of two wriis of seizure issued from

 ID the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama and to me direc,ed- have seized, and into my possession nave, 'he Shoomer DUANE and BREERWooD, their tao kle, apparel aud furniture th,s IS therefore ,o cue have, any right, title, interest or claim u or to the above named Schnoners, their tackle, apparel, &c., to be and appear before the Hon the Judge Q, the

 District Conrt of the Upited States Tor the Southern

 District of Alabama. on the fifth Monday inst. Sne s0th day of June, lS45) andshow cause fl any they have or can vhy inc above named Schooners, their tackle, apparel, &c., should not be condemned ac cording to the prayer of the libellant.

 WILLIAM ARMiSTEAD, U. 5 M. iel7 1-T- By c. CUYLER, D. M.