THE GOVERNMENT PAPER AND THE BAL1I-


MORE DEMOCRATIC CCONVENTION.
{"newspaper_name": "Weekly national intelligencer.", "edition": "01", "page": "pNone", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2331, "word_count": 403, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9672999978065491], "ccnet_perplexity": [943.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The official paper again parades half column
Of resolutions which il says were adopted by The
Baltimore (Presidential) Convention, and which
embody the Republican creed. For the "Repub-
lican," which has many hues the chameleon
and more phases than the moon, care nothing,
but it is positive uniruh to say that the resolu-
tons cited by the Union were adopted at the Bati-
more Convention 1t may appear SO upon the re-
cord, but it is not so in fact.


Is The Convention met on the 9th OF May, 1874,
and adjourned on the 30th.


The whole business of making President was
finished on the afternoon Of the 10Th, Mr. Hubbard,
of New Hampshire, having introduced Mr.. Folks
name on the morning OF that day.


On the morning Of the 30th, (the session being a
short one,) Mr.. Butler, OF New York, introduced a
series of resolutions, among which we find the fol-
lowing, now quoted by the Union to prove that the
whole Democratic party is pledged to the whole OF
Oregon:


Reaolued Thafour title 10 The WHOLE ofthe territory
of Oregon is clear and unguesfionabk that portion Of
the ought be ceded England any other Power
and that the reoccupaon Of Oregon and the remuneration
Texas, the earliest practicable PERIOD great American
measures which this Convention recommends TO the cordial
support Of the democracy Of the Union.


In answer to this resolution, aud the authority
claimed for it, we assert that mol one.fJM Of IN,
Delegates pere present ,che,a IL nas adopted, anc
therefore that il was not the'act Of the Convention
but at most the act Of committee All was "con
fusion, worse confounded,' when the Committee
on Resolutions was authorized and wheh the re
solutions were adopted. Great bodies OF the so
called Democratic party then, and ever since, have
practically repadated the doctrines of this resolution
All this was after Mr.. Van Buren, had been kick.
ed out of the Convention by the perseverance o
bold and open foes, and the intrigue treachery, and
weakness of professed and real friends. The world
we believe, never gave exhibition to much dou-
ble-dealing, falsehood, and hypocrisy was prac-
.ised in this same Baltimore Convention OF 1914
from which the Union now puts forth a new Re.
publican creed!'' What now is to become of the
creed of '9s, which the memorable organ has harp
ed upon for forty-one years pasts