{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2628, "word_count": 458, "ccnet_language_score": [0.974399983882904], "ccnet_perplexity": [1011.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



cal fatigue in their aborous duties also the mprobab
ly Of being able to the additional and necessary
number Of jurymen moved suspension OF further pro
ceedngs The Court under similar impre ssions, sign
fed its willingness to omit continued action in this
matter and discharged the number already secured in
this very important and proracted trial, much TO the
satisfaction and relief Of all parties really or indirectly
concerned in its issue.


The Court then adjourned until to morrow Crhursday)
morning at halfpast 10 o'clock


United states District Court.


The last term OF this Court closed on Saturday last
when Judge Belts delivered his opinion in the following
Myies Me Herman the Ship Harpest-Ths was a mo-
ton made by the claimants to compel the libellants
give additional security for costs In this case the Court
decided that competent for the Proctor OF claim
ants to make affdavits on which the motion
grounded.


This was suit brought by the plaintiffs to
pensation Tor services performed board the
to Liverpool and back this port On the part of
Plainants there was their evidence. For the de-
ience It had been shown by the chief engineer that
OF the men had been hired by him fremen for the
passage from New York to Liverpool and that the other
had been allowed to work his passage thher both of
them being desirous to get to England that one of
them in consequence of injuries received in Liverpool
was permitted to return in the ship and the other being
likewise anxious to get back to this country, al
low ed, by of Captain H., to work his passage
back The Court decided that there was no proof on
the part of the plants that any contract Of hiring had
been made between them and the captain master
that according to their testimony the Court could
not take cognizance Of the case.


The United States Us. George M Wooisey.-An action
brought to recover the sum of $3200OO being the
amount of penalty claimed for the violation Of the
barge law in January 1908 The defendant charged
with having, on the 10th Of January l50s despatched
ship from Jersey City to Liverpool laden with produce
Of the United States.


Judgment, in part, against both parties the demur
rer, with leave to amend and plead anew.


Superior Court-In Chambers.


Before Judge Oakley.


Case Of the Marine Court the american Institute
In this case, the Court declared that the proceedings
could not be conducted in the of the Marine Court
but could in the name Of the Common Council. The
matter, therefore, remains at present in satu quo.


Court Calendar-This Day.


COURT or COMMON PLEAs.-Nos. 3O 81, |, IL, "a, So,
49, II, 81, 81