{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2204, "word_count": 374, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9616000056266785], "ccnet_perplexity": [1032.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
"BlFps OF A FEATHER &r,''-ll has, of ten, struck us as very remarkable that many persons in the United States, profcsSipg to be .4aerieaas too, learn their politics from the National Intelligencer, and get all their impressions ofpublic men and things, through the same medium. Remarkable, not only because the Editor Of that paper is an Eng fstmat by birth, but gives daily evidence, and has done sofor many years, that he is an Eaglisf,aqa al heart. The truth of this may be demonstrated, by reference 10 the columns of that paper, wherein, any public measure, involving conflict of interest between this country and Great Britain, has been discuss ed, or even casually mentioned lt wiA there, be found that the Brilist side has al- ways been espousod, wigh earaosness and warmth; thus showing ,hat not oniy ill opin- ion, but in feeling, the Editor of the slntelli- gencer" is thoroughly British. On the north eastern Boundary question, and on the Right of Search, he took the British side. And so with the Texas and Oregon questions, he is British citizen, and British politician, to the hearts core Notwithstanding all this. which is staring his readers broadly in the face, we yetfnd American citizens, protesting Republicans, regarding him as their political Gamaliel, sitting at his feet, and imbibing his tenets and his feqlings We have no hesita- ton in saying that no man is sound Repab- licaa, a safe American politician, or fit to be trusted with the administration of public affairs, in any capacity whatever, who uses the ''National Intelligencern as a text book, or pins his political faith, as majority of the Whig leaders do, to the sleeve of the edi- tor of that paper.

 In accordance with these views, we recog- nize great point and force in the following paragraph, winch we find in an exchange paper:

 Dinner 10 he BriiiSh majSer-The seni- or editor of the National intelligeneer gave dinner to the British Minister. Some of our exchanges seem to think strange of it :; bul we agree with tlie |. S. Journal, that there Is certainly nothing very remarkably wonderful in one EagIiStmaa giving din- to another particularly when they so per 1 Lieetly agree in their political opinions