Common Pleas.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1066, "word_count": 187, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9580000042915344], "ccnet_perplexity": [2154.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



FEB 26.-Btnjamin .audesy VS. Robert Dduis ct di.In
this already noticed, jury rendered verdict in
favor of plaintiff of $50 damages, cents costs.


Benjamn Leroy VS. Warren s. Wilkey and Grisnold M.
Rogers This action of trover brought to
he value OF certain goods consisting of boots shoes &C.
amounting to some $500 $500 1t appeared in evidence
that defendants dealers in findings doing busnes: in
had been in the habit of SUPPLY ing the firm Of Coles and
Fenon dealers in shoes About that time Coles and Fen
toms credit being in rather they
assigned over the goods, &c., in the store to defendants,
Who at the instigaon OF other dors, allowed them
to continue the business In March 942 Coles left the
and in Oct 1884, Fenton made assignment to the
plaintiff; Wikey, however, seized the goods under the
prior assignment and they sold by Rogers is to
their value that plaintiff brings this suit For de-
fence the prior assignment offered in evidence in
swer to which it was contended by plaintiff that part of
goods taken by defendants not those assigned to
,hem