{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 770, "word_count": 137, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9836000204086304], "ccnet_perplexity": [610.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The card of Mir. CASE in yesterdays Advertiser requires no formal reply fromsus. The only ques. ton at issue between the editor of the Advertisers Price Current and our commercial editor is settled by this publication. The point was whether there was an understanding about the simultaneous issue of Wednesday. Mir c. says there was not, bat con- lesses there Das, by stating that he was told of intention 10 issue in the evening and that the time was changed to the morning by an arrangement that he should have our statement of stock lf al- terng the time, for considerations offered and ac- cepted, does not make arrangement" we have lost the idea of what an arrangement means,- the fact being admitted by Mir. Case, there is noth- ing more to be said on the subject.