From tie ". O. Tropie.
{"newspaper_name": "Arkansas intelligencer.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1613, "word_count": 274, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9488000273704529], "ccnet_perplexity": [1365.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



4 IOnr relations rih Msrieo.-Oddly enough as
s,eems to US, says the MY. Courier and Euquir.
in all the discussions concerning the probable
Lei upon Mexico, Of the course Of this govern.
Int in rega rd to anneIation, no reference seems
{bave been made to very peculiar provision
1.-The treaty Of. Amity, Commerce and Navlga.
n now subsisting belu cen the two countries. and
ich has been brought before the pablic in the
ube Of Monday. That treaty was negotiated
/ April. 1881, oad the third clause Of the 34Ih
ktic!e reads thus:


Bd. if (what indeed cannot be expec,ed) any of
articles contained in the present treaty shall
violated, or infracted 10 any manner whatever,
simulated that neither Of the contracting par.


will order or authorize any act of reprisal. nor
clare war against the other, on complaints Of in.
lies or damages, until the said party considering
I'm offended shall first have presented 10 the 9th.
Ia statement of such injuries or damages, ver.


by competent proofs, and demanded justice
4 satisfaction, and the same shall have been eli.
4 refused or unreasonably delayed.
I resentment, national or individual. says the
rprier,- were governed by laws or treaties. it
hit be inferred from the provision here recited,
a, however great the provocation we have given
Mexico. she would not make reprisals. nor resort
,hos;ilities without notice. But as war ipso fac
nbrouates treaties, Mexico, if otherwise ready
a hardly stav her hand out of respect for this
! provision, when she has made up her mind to
knway with the treaty altogether, and the ami
BE relations it was designed to cement.