{"newspaper_name": "Weekly national intelligencer.", "edition": "01", "page": "pNone", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1056, "word_count": 187, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9283999800682068], "ccnet_perplexity": [1837.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The New York Morning Ne,cs Of the goth, in
little less than rabid article on the Oregon SUBJ
ject--which we do not answer Gas we could con-
clusvely) because rather wait to see what ground
the Executive will take upon the subject, only ten
days hence--has the following paragraph;


ssThe National sezss hold % am sssicic q
ours upon the subject Of war; sndg direct and
scusive application the Oregon question: although that
natter was neither menioaed alluded to- with Of
jus,ying thereby ts course and arguments More
pecisy the Lntegency unjustIy represents article
scovery aimed venerable compatrot Of the Union,
when truth not only did not have that journal in
eye at ALL but the other hand commend its in rea
toa 70 Oregon. Our remarks general and confined
'rigidIy to the subject Of war


Upon which disclaimer, we can only say that, if
the young Editor Of the" News had not = his ven
cradle compatrof' in his eye, he undoubtedly con-
,trived to hat him without aiming at him. We have
heard Of random shots before, but never of SO re-
markable one. s