{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1375, "word_count": 241, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9230999946594238], "ccnet_perplexity": [1400.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THE MAGEETIc TELTdRAPH-AmsrieGn and Eng ish.A Comparison of the two systems Of the Magnetic Telegraph, m operation in this couutry and Great Britain respectively. leaves no for doubt as to the great superiority Of our own. We have q series of plates representing the British system and the nude uf wort ing it It Is coinpiea- ted in it's and less efficient than Mir Morse s The operator stands N iih index before him. by which he is to guide his movements; and by means of corresponding index at the other end oi lhe line the characlerso symbols polnled out as the mag netic influence operates IL is thus requisite that observers be always present at boh ends oi the line and if the observer is not walchlul. he may miss of the information indicated by the telegraph.

 The system of Prof. Morse more simple in it's construction. IL works with felicity and certainty, and nscribes the information il communca es m permanent characters upon paper, so that if ore Is watching the moment, the record uf every word transmitted hy il is 10 be found faithfully preserved

 In all the lines projected or established in England the Government takes care to have control. Ii ia proper that such should be the The passage of the b before Congress to extend the sy stem in this country. and 10 sustain the line already ir operation, would give general satsiaclion.-IBalti more American.