{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1076, "word_count": 170, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9453999996185303], "ccnet_perplexity": [1414.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
G. The Advertiser yesterday, defined it's position on the Texas question, very definitely again, in the following terms of general and special opposition to the measure:

 "Uncompromislng opposed to line present schene oi annexation, as both unconstitutional and nexpe- d'ent-bclleying il would operate to ihe serious n- uI ol the planting States hout bringing any brne- hts ln roturn-that it would weaken ihe bonds of our glorious union without adding the security of our peculiar institutions" !" and believing further. that u would be better, both for Texas and Inc United states, that the former should remain Independent Hsp"6he. we confess we should be extremely gra,ifed

 10 believe that there was the least prospect thai the scheme ot annexation would be finally frustrated"

 "unconsttutlopal and inexpedient" are the mod- he'd terms of description applied 10 the resolutions <" iopted. They used to be stronger, -nrgramly aad shametuly dishonest and wicked-tetore Nj. DELFT, whs voted for them in Congress, wa. pr, senled m te sane paper as its choice for Governor!