{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1771, "word_count": 292, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9297999739646912], "ccnet_perplexity": [1165.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THE OREGON NEGOTIATION The National Intellse sencer of the other day, expressed it's sas faction at being able to infer that the American gov eminent had proposed transfer to London the gotiation concerning the Oregon boundary, whicl, comprehensive enough to enable him to settle here. To ihis the Washington Union replies:

 "We cannot confirm it's 'satisaciIon' by a state meni of the fact. No such instructions have been transmitted to London--no such proposition made intention entertained of transferring the negotia- ton to London-no expectation. no idea, is formed here of renewing at London ihe proposition of our government which has been declined at Washington, {, and therefore all the ingenious speculalons of the National In,elIigrncer fall to the ground.

 While we have our pen Tn had. we seize the op- porlunity ofcontradictng al once another idle sup position ihro wn out in Philadelphia paper, viz:

 ''It is now alleged that the tender of the 18th de- gree was nothing than cosp defat on the part of Mir. Polk, place England in false position be- fore the nations of the world regard to the matter of compromise, ,'-h having been positively ascer- iained before the proposal made that it would be immt dately and unhesitafingly denIed; in which event the administration WAS fall back, il has done, upon it's original pretentions, and consider no terlns short of ille entire acknowe edgment of our rights to the Russian possessions"

 This whole statement is as little complimentary to the diplomatic skill of Mr. Pakenham as It is to the honorable character of our own government. We happen know, the most positive evidence, that there is not atom oftruth in nas the correspon- dence when it is laid before the world, wIll unques tiouaby demonstrate" "