Drnnch Mint in Ncw-Y ork.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1443, "word_count": 254, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9297999739646912], "ccnet_perplexity": [1348.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Secretary Of the Treasury has recommended
Branch Mint in this City, and bill has been sub
mt,ed accordingly. We may be expected to I'D
vocate It's passage on local grounds but if 80 the
expectation is illusory-we shall do nothing OF the
sort If Congress will remove the chief Mint 10
this City and abolish the Georgia and North Caro-
lima branches, we shall heartily concur; for we
think there just two proper locations for Minis
10 the Uuion-New York and New. Orleans. An.
other Branch, however, shall earnestly and
s,eadfasly oppose, though located in City.
1t would involve needless wanton waste OF the
Public Moneys foolish addition 10 the hurthens of
the People. All the specie that may be offered for
coinage here can be transported 10 Philadelphia and
brought back here for less than the interest on the
buildings und fixtures needed for a Branch Mint
here The time required for transportation is about
six hours each way What madness, then, TO au-
thorze new miutl


We know il Will be said that New York will be
benefited enriched. built up, by such acts the
establishment Of Branch Mint here. Rut we do
not deem this of any moment, and we consider the
corrupting pernicious influences OF new mes, Of
Federal Patronage mo matter which party hes the
control of III more than q balance for any local ad
vantage thence resulting We trust Congress will
scout the idea of another Branch Mint, and speedily
abolish two of those we have.