Marine Court.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": "Rn,ofe ludnn sherman."}
{"character_count": 1200, "word_count": 214, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9438999891281128], "ccnet_perplexity": [1814.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
-.
FsB 6-4ionso n Smith rs George W. Sdnyer.-The
plaintiff Is a land b-ckec in New York The defendant
resident in New Jersey The facts they appeared
in evidence we're tbst some during the early part
the yer 1914 the defendant applied to the plaintiff 20
purchaser for the farm OF defendant IN New Jersey


that nlantiF sent dafendsnt TO man named Godfrey
who had farm in Illinois which he wished TO exchange


rrey and defendant entered into written contract
10 terms Of exchange Of said farms &c. deads 10 he deli
vercd on tho Ah August, 1874 The agreement not
contaminated through some delay in procuring inorma
ton concerning the title of Godfrey's land in Illinois
Defendant contended that much The bargain
not completed between him snd Godfrey that plant n
not entitled 10 his commission The Court held tsr
in much as defendant aud Godfrey had taken
out OF the hands OF the plaintiff he broke by enter
ing into written contract and the gain sale
not completed snd not owing to default the
part OF the painf therefore he (raintif) entitled
~ recover for hs commissions which the Court chscssed
"a S32 being per cent tho value of tho farm Of
andant r. u. shannon for plaintiff defendant in per
SON