{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2020, "word_count": 337, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9735000133514404], "ccnet_perplexity": [1027.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In addition to the Mexican accounts, copied else where, we have received few additional accounts from Texas by the McKm, which arrived from Gal weston New Orleans Monday.

 President Jones has vetoed a resolution of con- gress, restoring Commodore Moore 10 his rank in he Navy. There is good deal of excitement among the Texan papers account otlhis act, which is attributed to private hostility

 The President has also communicated to congress the preliminaries oi the treaty with Mexico, agreed upon in the city of Mexico, under the charge of the French Minister there, .he Baron AHeys de Cywey, and 4Mr B4nkhsad, the British Minister IL appears by the published letter of the French Minister in I'exes, that these preminaries proposed by the Texan Cabinet to Salisny and Capt. EIllot in Texas, They were carried to the city of Mexico by Elliot, the British Minister, and there agreed to under the joint agenc, of De Cyprev and Bankhead. We knew previously that they were carried back to Tex as by Eliot. The foreign agency in that movement is thus officially ayowed by all parties. The follow ing are the preImnarins alluded 10, which Mexico consented to, with separate declaration that there are other essential points to be considered:

 'lst Mexico consents to acknowledge the Inde- nendence of Texas.

 "2d Texas engages that she will stipuIate in the treaty nat to annex herself or become subject any country wh tever

 "3I Limits and other conditions 10 be matter of arrangement in the final treaty.

 "4th. Texas will be willing to remit disputed points respecting territory and other matters 10 the arbitration of umpires."

 These were signed by Ashbel Smith, March 29th, ls45, Secretary of Slote, and desire attention to this joint interference of French and Engis agents, in direct hostility to the views and policy of the United States, contained in the second snpula- tion. What have France and England to do, in Ame- rica, in thus making national movement of Ameri- can governments against the U States?