{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1227, "word_count": 224, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9416999816894531], "ccnet_perplexity": [2016.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
felt that they should be expected tn risk them selves to accomplish, at great hazard, for others what seemed s0 little to interest them. Silll the Mercury puts au it's stress this omission oi the democracy to do it's duty in 1s4S'44, AS haNng des- lroyed southern confidence in Mr. Van Bursn twhieh we have sad, displayed iISe most alally n le4o0 and as fully accounting for hIs overthrow in tho Baltimore convention in ls44 It concludes it's ar | tcle on these premises ihus:

 "1hus the Hsaehsry cf the "orther" democracy on th, fay,f ard on he 2lst ,uie aided orrrthTotO,ng 1 Mir. Van Baren."

 There are two very remarkable facts which mil, tate against this conclusion ot all Inc reasoning oi Mercury Ia show thai Mr. Van Buren lost the aomi- nation at Baltimore in consequence oi the "Teache- " of the northern democracy" to its southern bre,h ren, in failing a repeal the arf and m repeating ihe 2lst rule. In the first place, Mr. Van Buren lost the nomination by the vote of northern democrats who favored the iarff as it stoodi and he did moi lose il by the repeal of the 2lst rule because 'ha rule was not repealed uni last pntsr. and the Bait more nomination was made m May of last sPri"g- some sr mouths prspiousiyH