{"newspaper_name": "Iowa territorial gazette and advertiser.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1178, "word_count": 226, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9070000052452087], "ccnet_perplexity": [1550.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



dary, and we are in favor Of making an.
other effort to induce Congress to recoe-
nize it As such; but we would not pur-
chase the line 1t too great price. It is
not necessary, in order to 60 to that river,
that we should dismembef any portion of
the Territory a at present ofganized, nei;-
thsr will our people Be willing to do co.
Il, instead Of the 42d deg. Of N. latitude,
the people Of the North win unite in ask
ing for the 43d, little doubt can exist but
that such change can Be effected Il the
next session Of Congress. The objection
made hy those who spoke in favor of Dun
cans asnendment was to the extent and not
the shape Of our State. Such line would
give us front on the Missouri greater byt
about one-third than that now proposed BY
our Dubuque fellow citizens, and would
leave us the same number Of square miles,
within ! very small fraction, that are con-
tained within the boundaries prescr;bss ty|
Congress. Its sdoplin can sas;ly Il Z.
fsctsd if the uppss sounsies wlilaccede 81
the CHANGE. - - s Is


1se Niafsser nay b dine b. ths .I1se-
's'atprs q psspaeaof I0~a h he premises.
Ilns sspposilion that Congress ean:be 3.
axa - lxe.Es e ssss@ss = IL = - -