{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 975, "word_count": 155, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8565999865531921], "ccnet_perplexity": [1750.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MATRIMONIAL CAsES DECIDED BY TIE CHANCEL-
LoR. August 30, IS45-Sarah Ann Haydock vs.
William A. Haydock-Decree for absolute divorce Of
the wife for the adultery of her husband and awarding
the care and custody of the children of the marriage to
the wife Peter VOORHEES, Caroline Murphy falsely
called Caroline voorheis-Decree declaring the marri
age contract between the parties void, the ground
that at the time marriage the former husband fhe
defendant and still is living RoberGillet vsAnn Gil
let alias DictusAnn SeuDe.ree for absolute dvorceof
the husband for the adultery and bgamy Of the wife,
Nelson Robinson Catharine Robinson.-Decree for
absolute divorce Of the husband for the adultery Of the
wife William King Pendleton VS.. Olive Pendleton.--
The like decree. Truman Whtcomb VS.. Lucy NJ. Whit
comb.Decree for absolute divorce OF the husband for
the adultery of the wife, and declaring the three young
est children of the defendant illegitimate .ar
gus, Sept. l.