CITY INTELLIGENCE
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": "COvRT or SE SSlO\\S."}
{"character_count": 5454, "word_count": 1027, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9595000147819519], "ccnet_perplexity": [2305.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
N, Vrr1r IS
obi,isd SONG seoooo by false preenee from the h''" 0
80 srr.i,u SAGE y Co. Of this City-"hich was COM
r.; On Saiur!ly was resumed. he Count pFoHouH'eu
=. ;;,r ,brorsh the Recorier-ihl the indictment was


aceu;i- eorrcct for all legal purposes and o'e't"S ~
direction, OF the defendants counsel orreEru 'ie "
cd The counsel for defence took e1erptions 10 'he .s
at The c.urt aud the testimony Of Mr. Sase was 'esu'e "
wen, , To euuuc.,ie the several drafts tFaSnttta 70 nun.
frrn time 10 time from Seymour watts Tor 4Nd'' WIN
,h accompanying certificates Of deposit Mr. es"s u.s.
,b- amount r,l hy ttcF 1rIn eymo1f dfa "ts
, On ". Watts drafts S3iiC0 al these the hfih oi guy
tam Sage Co had clshed OF ,!eir own proper ands


for the benefit Of Adams letter WIS read from 9'' "
Suvta Sase Co dated 2l, lSi' and was Ia iet
ton TO the deposit OF flour requesting them 10 retain u
,l for the present Also anohes lei'er ifeH the same
70 the sane h October, statag that some nou' hau
been shipped for New Orleans.


Durns the brief lnerresnum Of business. the following
5n BoS convicted Of not on the Is, January breaking
windows, &c sentenced 70 ray lne OF -. bcr.e


Cornelius Noonsm. convicted OF keepus aiiVFueH nous,
In Orange street. was ord red 10 iaT me ci -


The trial OF Samuel Adams then resumed MI sahs
bury rose and that the reading oi the letters Nc u'u MOI
in any manner prove the scienteI' or guilty kno"iecse-n"
were improperly introduced they aot stated IN the m
diciment.


MrWood ioowedo en- the same side aud wished to know for
wh., specific purposes hsy were Introduced when ne WANT
ed the Counsel 10. the People to state


Mr. hitus said he did Introduce them t1 any seriIe
purpose but as general evidence


The Court being TO- decided those parts OF the let
m that tended 10 support the indictment, should be read
other Parts emitted. The counsel for defence encered


Several other letters dated January II and February - from
Adams to Suydam TO. were read calns or the pay
meu the balances OF his account TO George po"SasS anu
another stating the amount Of of his drafts ne
bills of ldin. were also read and the amount OF porS lard
have been shpFed not rece'ed ny S"y
dam Sage Co. The total of this iSSo bels oi pork
1913 bbls pounds of ham, itness never
inquired at the times the drafts and receipts came on but sur
posed the property all in deposit for him. first
the wrong In March last when Mr. Wesser came IN town.
asked him what dctaed the property, s>c Some ten days
after Ar. Adams hmself saw HIM at the -Ns''t
House invited him the he came in few days; asked
him detained the rroie he said the canal IN Ono was
closed that he had 5000 bbs of pork IN Cicleve ana
1000 bbls prime hams another place. asked him II the pork
was in the hands of Seymour and Watts he said 1t was
and had been then first dceoNered the iaud ana
found that allowing the 5000 bbs Of pork above stated that
there about bbs of pork wanting This discovery
alarmed and also because learned that the property had
been in the hands Of Seymour aud Watts We then EN-
d-avoe Mr. adams III possession OF the buVu
bb pork he said the property would be here the open
ng of the canal; satisfied and tired TO get OF
Adams proicrty but he replied that order
necessary that the pork would he shipped on The
opening of the canal We appointed TO NEE, at o'clock NJ
the and possession oi the oieFY but
before the he off Philadelphia aud did not come
he out without our knowledge. The meeting
ranged bv Mr. Wesser bu, Mr. Adams left for Philadelphia
leaving his wfe behind; received in all 5S5 bbs oil pork
deficient 70 li3 bbls received 5s bbs a deficient, 90 bb;
received 1850 ass pounds of hasdeccn 21 O2 pound, OF
hams.


1t was proposed to prove what Mr. Watts (.ne OF the de
pcsores of the property of Adasl said upon the SUBJECT
so that way that had had been IN his pos
session. THIS objected 10. and objection sustained


Witness proceedny partner pursued Mr. Adams 10 PHI
alcpha know he went auy pnt of the 6,O0O
bh pork Adams said he had in Ohio the balance due
US without interest is s53,23l SO.


Cross.eramined-Frst commenced business operations
with Mr Adams in October i83sold some thousand Que
hundred aud two bbls of flour for him. Mr.. Wcsser III
this city in August 1913 and called 10 make advances
Of money to buy flour; he the of Mr. Adams
asa peffy think We advanced Weser Co. that Adams
in fact some S5OOcs for 10000 bbl OF flour bought in this
cv sons goo bbs choice fom Ohio as think these


distinct of the O2 sold for Adams above have rendered
an account of sales the 0t0 bbls OF flour sold for em
to Mr.. Wesser; but not TO Adams


Mr. ADAMS proposed prove that this Hour Transaction had
been very disastrous and that large Of the 500 23 SO had
been lost to Adlms which the Of the present def
ell Objected to and after argument waived.


Witness-liyself with Mr.. Greg. the Attorney Of our
house composed the form of the receipt, BE- used and which
was Used receipt Of produce for sent 100 10 $50
out to the VEST they are all the western couury the
drafts brought office say day before accept
ed The gross amount for Adams SiiO7G 49, the
net amount was SIS $40 49, Mr.. Adams brother paid
March 1871 the sum of $4,000; the charges the bill Of sale
were s8 1885, we purchased and sold pork
in May June Jul and August 1916 sold by contract
to be delivered aiead


The Court adjourned TO Wednesday morning, II o'clock.


COUNTY COURT