{"newspaper_name": "The North-Carolina standard.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1166, "word_count": 210, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9585999846458435], "ccnet_perplexity": [1067.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Hillsborough Recorder has misrepresent


ed US t,ciee upon the same subject. A few weeks
since spraking Of the course Of The Wings in the
Tennessee Senate we said "Whiggery is the
same every where, in its faetiousness and l" ai'
imOrdinote lore of pOaeer," and the Recorder, in
order 10 make out a case TO suit itself, quoted the
first clause of the observation, and kept back that
part of it now put in italics We are not, howev-
cr, disposed TO be very particular about The mat
ter. especially as the Recorder will find it impos-
sible to make out Whiggery the same every
where in its action upon public questions. Does
the Recorder, for instance, occupy upon the Tex
as question the same ground with MIR. Webster ,


Is that paper governed, as MIR. Webster seems to
be, by the 90 idea that there may be yet hope for
resistance to the consummation Of the annexation
of Texas"2 Ifso, we beg leave 10 say that the
veteran of the Recorder differs materially with
the Register, for that paper of yesterday sings. to
all intents and purposes, another tune. Verify,
Whiggery is not the same every where, except
in its factousncss and in its inordinate love OF
power"