{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1723, "word_count": 296, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9143000245094299], "ccnet_perplexity": [2256.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
large portion of the importatons in the first six
months OF lsai, was in the foreign manufactures Of
europe paying very high per cent duty which swesd
the average cent upon the imports much higher than


Tor the year previous The average for this year. far
only ranges about five per cent above the standard
quircd by the most ultra free trade man in the country
and Is opinion the present tariff would not in


three years hence produce than average duty Of
twenty per cent three parties in this country
upon the ston of the tariff First have the free
trade party then the standard party and
the protectonsts There not practical principle In
the whole three parties Those advocating trade
have practical illustration Of the system; it far


theory, and its adoption would be experiment
Those advocating standard have fixed idea
of what that standard must be yield sucent
to meet the expenditures of government year with
another What they mean by revenue standard Is un.
doubtedly producing revenue large enough meet
the wants Of government alone without giving dollar
surplus or leaving deficiency II is we'll known that
the mporations into this country auctuate very much


from year year, and tho from customs under
any regulation Of tho tariff fuctuate with tho i'm


ports. The table have given above Of revenue from
customs, under tlc present tariT l. shows auctuaton


in year Of naaily two hpnrcl per cont and tariff
averaging por cent five per cent lower than that
Of 1ea2 will be subject to the extremes There /,
no such thing as settled standard OF duties
Thirty per cent this year may DO revsnun standard and
twenty-five per cent would bs reysnns standard next


ssssa rs9sFsd 10 prsauss ssrala AHsus, Of wyssus