{"newspaper_name": "The Washingtonian.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1400, "word_count": 244, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9562000036239624], "ccnet_perplexity": [2261.89990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
KINDNESS TO SERvAETs.-1 here Is nothing
in whic! The Imagination, that handmaid oi
charity, ma; he more advanageously employ
ed than in {, n>ider,ng the condition of domes
tic servants. Let man endeavor to realize j,
lu himselt--lel him think Of its narrow sphere.
Of its unvarying nature-and he will be care
ful not to throw in unneces .arily, the trouble
of even single harsh word. which may make
SO large disturbance in The shallow curren'
of domeslic's hopes and joys How often
on The contrary, do you find that masters seen
TO have no apprehension of the duies on thei'
side beyond cash payment" whereas the
good old palriarchical feelings towards youi
household is one which The mere introduction
of money wages has MOI by any means super.
ceded You would bear with enily from .
child many things for which, in serven,, you
can find nothing hut the harshest names. Ye'
how often are these poor uneducaled creatures
| little better than children You talk, too, o
ingraliiude from them, when, if you reflec et
little, you would see that they do not under
stand your benefits 1t is hard enough some
times to make benefits sink into mems hearts
even when your good offices are illustrated by
much kindness of word and manner; but ,t
expeclthat servants should at once appreciate
your care for them is surely most unreasona
bic, especially if il is not accompanied by Z
lnanifestLegard and sympathy.