Marine Court.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2206, "word_count": 377, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9728999733924866], "ccnet_perplexity": [1595.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
srrr. 22.-John Barmore, minor, By his nert friend,
Smhl Reed and uVeAn action Of trespass to reco-
Mrs Reed (who is mpeaded with Reed, the deiendant)
having set her dog upon Barmore, "a child OF about
OF age the dog having torn the side of the boy
and cut him i'll dangerous manner, in August last at
Lewis street The defence set up was that the boy
teazng the dog n company with several other lads and
that the dog had been rated when he bit the boy Ver
dict for plaintiff $40 damages.


John Henry BatesbH Charles s. Spedr.-This was
who chief the ship Massachusetts against
the defendant, captain OF the ship The plaintiff
proved by Henry Catternole that he struck by the
dsendan and that in attempt to gouge his eye the
defendant injured the plaintiffs face and then threw him
of the cabin, calling him d-d of bitch, and
saying that would do him good to kill him. The de-
ence that the difficulty between the parties com.
menced by the defendants ordering plaintiff to the fore


ing his business and that going when ordered the
defendant attempted to put him forcbly, when the
.quabbe occurred and that the defendant justified
under the circumstances Verdict this forenoon.


Before Judge smith,


Henry Gosiing rs: Henry koPpemdn.-The parties in
this suit rival eating house keepers the plaintiff
keeping in Nassau street and the defendant 2 Fulton
street


The plaintiff it appears attaches great credit his
house on account OF the superiority oil his puddiDgs and
being desirou Of maintaining his stand in that respect
hired man named Becker fer the purpose of making
puddngs in scientific manner he being famed artist
in that line.


Mr. Koppleman in disregard OF the commandment
which says you must not covet your neghbors OK,
your neighbor's ass did Notwithstanding covet his
negnbors pudding maker and succeeded in enticng this
celebrated artist out of the employ of Mr. Gosling with
whom he had engaged for the aforesaid purpose for
year, at SlI per month, board included.


Mr. Gosling considering his reputation for puddngs at
stake, now brings suit against Mr. Koppleman for da
images arising from the pudding makers being coaxed
from him by defendant.


The case was adjourned till Tomorrow