{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1286, "word_count": 219, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9556999802589417], "ccnet_perplexity": [892.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The refusal of the mission to England by hr. pickens, of South Carolina, s saId to have been placed upon the ground, that the Statesmen of South Carolina--sonetinles tt is sad more sweepinRly. the Statesmen of the Sourh-ought not to take office under the general government until Southern views are predominant in the alminisraiion. This reason not given when Mr. CALHOUN nor when Mr. ELMoRR declined the same mission. IL is some thing unexpected, too from Mr. PIcKENs, who we remember, the reputed author of . letter from Tennessee 10 the Richmond Enquirer, much com menfed upon during the last summer, in South Caro- lima, wherever Mir. PoLK's posltIon on the yexed question oi the tariff vouched for as perfect ly satisfactory We hope, therefore, that there is some this statement, and that there is no concert ed understanding among any portion of the demo- cratic party to withhold their confidence from Mir POLK, and stand aloof from his adminisra tion up- ayowed grounds of distrust in its political s0und- ness. We told that efforts have been made 10

 induce Mir ELMoRE [, reconsider the urgency of the reasons of personal inconvenience alleged as the cause of his acceptance. In the event of his de- cIining. Mir. RHETT or Mir. HOLMES is spoken of as likely receive lhe offer.