{"newspaper_name": "Arkansas intelligencer.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1642, "word_count": 279, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9495000243186951], "ccnet_perplexity": [1445.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Diplomatic MyAery.-l here is something mys.
terous in tho manner in which Mr.. SaIieny. the
French Charge to Texas, hns busted himself about
between Galveston and Washington like a will.
O, the. .wisp-foowing Capt. Elliott hither and
thither as shadow of that funciionary. We heal
of him at the capital, on the seaboard, and at in
,ermedlate towns. and always in company with
the English Minister. A few days ago Capt. FL.
lott left Texas for Charleston. and forthwith Mr..
Saligny gives the United Stn,esa vis, too. Wha,
does all this meant What are the l,ga!ures that
bind these foreign diplomats in such sweet and
sympathetic embraced Mr.. Saligny is reported
to have snd that Texas will not-nay, shall NOT;
be annexed! What is it to him! Mr.. Calhoun $
Iolter to Mr.. King, published some five months
ago, distinctly asserts that Louis Philippe decar-
ed to the American Minister at Paris that the
French Government would take no exception To
annexation. This positive declaration has not
been controverted Ii stands rs the key to French
views upon this question, and yet Mr.. SaIigny
skips about upoa tho arrival Of British vess"ls At
Galveston as though the salvation Of Chris,endom
depended upon the agility Of his movonents.--
What does this por,ends


Has the French King rrevarca.ed in this mat.
ter, This cannot be believed. There is no ground
that we have seen for supposing any such thing
Had there been an error in Mr.. Kings report o.
the conversation had between him and Louis Phil.
Iippe upon this subject. the correction would have
been made upon the publication Of Mr.. Calhoun's
despatch. AS yet none has been made, though