Common Pleas.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2617, "word_count": 462, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9729999899864197], "ccnet_perplexity": [2264.10009765625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Oct a9-Taomas Egission and Joseph Batteli ss Csv-
nsIius York and John Munson.Tbis action Z
drawn II appeared that the note made pay able
to the order OF party named D. W. Beaa aud was dat
ed 18th October 1874 Before the note came to msturi
ty, he parted with it to party named sedgewick,
collateral security for Of $500 ach he received


~ vna' n0,e Wss nos 70 be be
Sedgewick into the hands OF the plaintiffs who seek
to recover fiom the makers. The defence set UP
that the note was misapped and also that consdera
ton given The defence further alleged usury
Verdict or plaintiff s2l2 including interest Tor the
OF 5000 lent on the note with cents costs.


n john Kelly rs Louneeiot Ho1ard-Ths action
of trespas damages assault and battery
1t appeared tina. pending some, law proceedings, in
named Hughes was appointed receivar, and proc ceedel
si to
sion to take the beer he returned telling Kelly about il
Kelly returned, with nephew OF his, named McGlo-
herty, who struck by defendant in squal Bile that
ensned; and Kelly having interferei share
of the spos both his eyes being changed brown blue,
fence set up that lanti gave tae first blow and
that defendant had octed in selidetence The jury will
render a sealed verdict this loren IN


Before Judge DAILY.


Harvey Dayton rs. Dr. "A. Shotucett.--Ths ac-
ton a note for Sll0, given by plaintiff for horse
which was purchased from him by defendants brother
The defence set that there consideration
given the note being given by defendan, Tor the
mediation Of his brother was further up defence
that the horse was unsound, and died from disease
which had contracted before 1t Sold being
ranted The plaintiff rejons that warrantee
gwen Defendant purchasing at ms own flsk verdict
for plaintiff STA 81 damages and six cents cost.


A. Hoyt rs. .7Hen Mner.-Ths was action under
the lien law, which commenced in the year 1899
brought TO 500 for work done by plaintiff
for his father who had contract to build house for
defendant in Henry street The has already been
twice tried. II appeared that the contract price
S556p aud the time specified or finishing the contract
was in April, 1899 ire having occurred the pre-
misses about the middle Of the said month damaged the
building The plaintiff claims that at the time of the
fire the building nearly completed and that sum Of
5000 would have finished it according TO contract. 1t
in m ont
claim against the insurance company put estimate
for $1,000 and that $500 paid by defendant the
contract The chief point at issue in relation 10 the
amount for work plaintiff at the time the building took
fire. Adjourned over