II r X A S.
{"newspaper_name": "Washington telegraph.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2754, "word_count": 510, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9614999890327454], "ccnet_perplexity": [1509.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
II T. Y 4 y.


The passage ofthe resolutions anheN"S
Texas to the United States is yet q"'e
doubtful. We predict thai The Senate VII.
net concur in ibe IN sure; II so, 'he s'o'
people Of the nation must wall patiently
and let time accomplish what our Congress
could or rather would not do. U! The poi'c!
of this measure we have already spoken
I'm fac, so far as we are individually con
cerned. we have no objections to IFS annex
alton. We feared tha; in these tunes oil
party and party legislation, the Cons'''u-
ton might suffer violence from the measure
of acouisi,ion-bui no ma,tcr-.hc cOnse-
auences will fall on others as well as on us.
We really havo racked our brain to con
ceive in what point of view this na'Ion
could be benefited by the project. Our
conclusions may be erroneous. so we are
more Than willing, indeed anxious is know
whether we were right. 1t has been urged
that annexation would give an impetus to
every thing in Arkansas; il so, we hope
and trust the Senate will pass the reso.u-
tions and start Che ball. Tcxasis a country
of some value: but take it all in al! i, is moi
more Of an "Ei Dorado" or ''EiySium
than many other sections of the G'obr.
The following frcm Col. Ashley and Judge
| Cross is the latest news we have upon the
subject.


Col. Ashley says in letter OF The 81
/ Instant:


"On the presentation Of the Louisiana
Resolutions in the Senate. declaring that a
majority of the inhabitants OF Louisiana
were in favor OF immediate anaeNa;i' N
I Mr.. johnson OF La. stated thai the Resoiu-
tons were in accordance with his sehii-
mems. and that he was in favor OF anneNa-
ton. but would no: say he was III tacor q
The Resolutions Of The House.


Mr.. Barrow came out openly and stated
that he was against annexation now and al
any time hereaf.er-ihis looks om:no'ls.
4 Col. Ashley, again, says in letter da'e'
the 9Th inst:


The Committee on Foreign Rc'Gfio1s
of The SenIfe, his day reported on The an
neraiion of TerdS. Il a''rc1se!y' and 1ccoHipg
nied lrih reSo'a'ioH 10 reject me RfSo' u
tioas passed By The House, which was or
:. dered to be printed. There was no minorit,
report. Mr.. Buchanan stated that he wa'
alone in the minority, and that instead ol ;
report he would take occasion at the carries
moment to give his views TO the Senate
and that he was in favor of the Resoiu
lions as passed by the House of Repre-
sentatives. and against the Report Of ih'
committee. Next Monday was fixed W
on to commence the discussion OF the sub
ject.'


Judge Cross says, in 4 letter dated th'
81 inst:


.Ofrhe fate of the matter in the Senate
(anEexatiun) 20 one can predict with an,
thing like certainty, although we hope
viii prevail. We may rely confidently.
hiak, upon the roe Of the trso senalor
from Ner York"