In Chanccry-
n-r- A.. W.. ~. nm n al Ia,
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1834, "word_count": 316, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9193000197410583], "ccnet_perplexity": [1511.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Before the Vice Chancelor


Feb. SYM. PtarsaH VS.. George Osfrander.-The judg
and execution having been intended by the agree
Of Sh June l644 specifically to secure the
Of the purchase money under that agreement by creating


lien the property sold but upon no other property
and for other purpose as IS manifest from the agree
ment ITSELF the complainant could not rghtuy use the
Judgment for any other purpose. The judgment and
.cution appear to have been taken like mortgage
chattels to create lien the specific property with
power Of sale in case OF q default Of payment


Motion for q receiver denied-costs to abide the event


Order that the injunction be dissolvedcoss to abd,
the event OF the suit


George Hopkins Daniel Mallo,y.-Order of refer
ence to Master W. H. Etng to appoint receiver accord
ing to the notice OF motion.


John Mel Charles A. Col and JOHN George anderson vs
LotceH Holbrook, james g. Graham and The Bank at Flo
rids-Ths appears to be case of an equitable set of
within the principle Of Lindsay Jackson. Order this
the injunction be made absolute stay Of proceedings
the Court at Law.


josiah s. Hart VS.. Richard f. Biyden5urgh.-The motion
for receiver denied and the motion to dissolve the In
junction granted The answer contains full denial
the equity the BILL and although the oath OF the defend
ant was waived nothing in the case that should in
duce such dstrust of the truthfuness OF the answer
to make matter of to dissolve the Injunction
In the adavits got for the motion for receiver ther
nothing contradicting dsproving the main fact
the answer viz that the defendant absolute pur
chaser of the claim against Levi Sherman and lender
money upon it, He may have made an excellent bargain
speculation and such he is fairly entitled
to the whole benefit until his of the TRANSACTION
be disproved.