Mexican TTOstliitics.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": "know 1t."}
{"character_count": 2651, "word_count": 483, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9527000188827515], "ccnet_perplexity": [1471.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
N~ The n. I. Tribune Is in awful state OF alarm. lest
Mexico should revenge the annexation of Texas by The
confscaton OF all American property IN that country and
by an Invasion Of country and various other acts o;
horrible vengeance How miseraby contemplate is such
an effort ON the part influential American press 10 Ia
duce the commission of the very acts 1t tcts to regard
with so much horror J!


II ia the Rochester Daify which treats Us 10 this
slang slightly varied from the cuckoo notes OF the
Plebeian, Morning News, Albany Argus Atlas etc.
The Rochester liar has manufactured SO much as
relates 10 an invasion Of our country" but he
draws for the rest upon bis memory and his scls-
sors We do indeed apprehend that our fellow
coun,rymen in Mexico may be subjected, II not TO
constrant and loss by the Government, then 10
ouirages at the hands OF Mexican mobs excited 10
madness by the tidings Of our Governments appro-
priatlon Of their lost province. Cowardy as seems
TO US this spoliaton of weak and distracted ma
ton, the neglect TO warn or guard our own people
from the vengeance it may provoke is an addition
10 It's iniquity. AS assumption of the quarrel OF
Texas is plainly an ac, Of defiance and hostility 10
Mexico, we contend that our Government should
have put bold face on and sent strong fleet 10
the Gulf 10 look after the safety of our Country
men. This has been prevented by the fraud OF
calling that peaceful aud just which was i'll truth
violent and rapacious. Thus, only few days
since, the Morning Nt,rs gravely argued tha, Mex
icos quarrel with Texas was terminated by the act
Of Annexation that Mexico was peacefully es-
topped by that act from pursuing her claim! THIS
luminous Doctor of Laws did not tell us how the
boundary of the two hitherto hostile nations was
settled by our taking one OF them into our
family. AS no such defined boundary has ever yet
existed. il would seem that there should be some
way Of settling one before two warning nations are
set at peace with each other by the ac, Of third
power. But not SO according to the News. By
that journals logic should Prussia, for instance
suddenly invade France when the latter dreamed
not Of hosiilies, ravage and annex five or six
Departments, she need only, when France had pre-
pared to rspel and avenge the aggression, annex
herself, plunder and all, 10 Russia, and the war
would be al an end. Ii France should proceed 10
punish the perfdious assault upon her, she would,
according 10 the News be guilty of tcaging ,rar on
Russia The question that puzzles us is this
Must France submit 20 the loss of her annexed ,
Departments Is there no nep for her,