{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1333, "word_count": 222, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9283999800682068], "ccnet_perplexity": [1500.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We had marked fer Iutlicaion to-day, Governor BRIaes' special message to the legislature of Mas sachuseus in relation to he Iloar missIon but upon q second perusaI we find it characterised ly no ; tcuhr feature that renders il of either much quence or interest II is much tanner document than ~e had expecled-siVipg merely brief history of the appointment of the "Hon. Mir. lloar" and the "Hon. Mir. llubbard," and the summary expu usion of the former from Chareslon-nnda brlefeI argument of ihe constitutional right of Massachusetts, founded upon opinions oi Win Wirt, when Attorney General and Judge Johnson of the Supreme Court of the Uni ted States, to lIligsfe the questions upon which she wishes to raise an issue. Among the accompanying documents were Ihe ,eaoutions of South Carolina and the letter of Mr. Hoar. They were all referred

 to the appropriate committee, whose report may be looked for early day. We shall douLIless, then, have another specimen ol the attachment of Massa- chusetis to he s'constiiuton 1t ls'of her ideas of 'the rights of her sister Stalcs"-of what her notions of what IS or what is not "derogatorv lEe character of the conederacy" The Charleston Mercury aptly remarks thai, State Rights with Us is the right of seif-defence-wiih Mssachusetis, it is the rgnt of vexing and mrrassing her neghbors.