{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 6575, "word_count": 1120, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9433000087738037], "ccnet_perplexity": [933.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
cOnec- lion of bank debts. It has reference 10 bill which did not pass. but il is an independent yo4e on this point. The motion was made by Mir. Hud- of Franklin, and lost by the following vote

 ATEs-For inserting 3S1 per cent-Messrs Ar ringlon. Ashe, Creagh, Harris, Hsdson, McAlpin. McClan0han, Norris, Reese, Sellers. Spruill, Wal ker oi Benton, Ward, Marcus, Walthau and Wat kins-l6.

 NAVs--Against inserting the 33s per cent Messrs. PresdtRt (T'rry.) Bishop, Dargan, Dent, Doaeherty, Fleming, Glchlist, GriGn, Hardaway, Marehbanks, Morris, Ohver POsey, Sniith, Waker of Limestone, Winston and WiisoR-l7

 So, the one third raIe was lost The party com plexion of the vote we have distinguished by placing the democrats in italics The seventeen nays who come under the ban of the Dallas denuncialions are eleven democrats and six whigs, as follows;

 DemocraIs-Terry of Limestone Bishop of Talla- dega, Dargan of Mobile, Fleming of Madison. Grif- fin of Marshall, Marchbanks of Fayette, Posey of LauderdaIe, Smith of De Kab, Walker of Lime stone. Winston of Sumter, and Wilson of Jackson

 Whigs-Dent of Tuscaloosa, Dougherty of Macon. Gilchrist of Lowndes, Hardawsy of Russell, Moorss of Marengo and Oliver of Montgomery.

 A very instructive list this, to be studied by those who dognat "ally declare the principle of this vote, to shew tendency to repudiation! similar vote taken on the 22d of January, | on the House Bill, which afterwards became law. 1 When it taken up in the Senate Mir. DENT mo. ve strike out "one trd and insert .sone fourlh'' for the rale of collection of the bank debl The yeas were-Presdent (Tenv,) DUgan, Dent, Doughertv, Fleming. Gilchrist, Gritfa, Hardaway, McCiana- han, Oliver, Posey, SmHh and Wilson thirteen still for altering the House bill On ihe final passage of the bill in the Senate there 22 ayes, nays. The nays were-7erry, Fleming. Gilcirist, Gri6in, Oliver, Walker Of Limestone, and Wilson. Four ab- sentees, viz: Darean, Doug,erty, Moores and Mo-. 1 Alpin.

 The same test question made in the House of Representatives, and il may be useful these folks who getting up this silly crusade against all those who doubted the expediency of this "one third'' rule to mark who led n opposing and who voted against it. For example.

 On the 14th of January, the bill (whlch finally passed) being under discussion, Mr. McClung, of Madison--the same Mir. McClung, of Madison, who was favored by of the enemies of Terry their candidate for Governor and among them. we doubt not many of the movers of this very obieclion this same Mr. McClung moved strike out lhe "one third" provison--leavng it open to insert some smaller amount. For this motion (page 2a3-House Journal) he got 25 votes. Here they are-Messrs Speaker (A. s Moore of Perry) AIdridge of BIount, Allen of Randolph, Baker of Walker, Bell of Fla yette, Bowden oi Taadega, Brandon of Madison, Chandler of Mobile, Clay of Madison, Clemens of Madison, Cobb of Jackson, Cook of Lowndes, Dunn of Mobile, Fletcher of Marshall, Gepin of Lawrence Hall of Baldwin, Hays of Marshall, Jackson of Au- lauga, Jemeson of Tuscaloosa, Jones of Bount Jonts of Lawrence, Judge of Greene, Kitlrell of A-..I-. .F AI.. Mudd Of Jefferson. Norman of Franklin, Perry of Morgan, Roby of Morgan, ScOn Of Jackson, Scott of Macon, Speigh Of Henry, Steele of Auiausa, Wi. Hams of Jackson, Williams of Montgonler and Waiker of Lawrence.

 or the members from this county, Chandier and Dunn voted against the ''one third" ratio, and Sea- 'oeH and Philips for it. In the Senate, Senator DarRan voted against it.

 On the final vote, for the passage of this bill, there 3l nays, viz: Aldridge, Botpdon. Bran don, Clay, Clemens. Cobb, Cook, Dunn, Fletcher, Gewin, Hall, Hays, Jackson, Jemison, Jones of Blount, Jones of Lawrence, Judge, Kidd. McCiung, Nipples Mitchell of Tuscaloosa, Norman, Perry. Prince, Roby, Scon of Jackson, Steele, Walke-, Hili,ams of Jackson, Williams of Montgomery and Young.

 On the final vote (JonrnaI, pages 300 and 3O1 ) Chandler and SeaDeA of this county, voted for the Dill and Dunn against it. Mr. Phillips did not vote we believe he had left the city.

 Dunn and Dalgan, who both opposed this "third'' ratio throughout, the candidates for con- gress in this disrict-one nominated by the whig party and the other by the democratic party, with. out syllable having been said of either, that they are unfit candidates account of their views this question, tending to ''repudation," although they agreed with Terry in the vote for which he is 90 bitterly denounced.

 We have collected these few details, not that any defence was really needed for Col TERRY, against the foolish of this attack, but that its nsn- cerity might be exposed to the reproduction which it deserves.

 There is, m truth no difference of opinion or pur- pose, among the people of this State, the subject of repudiaion. There are no repudIators, open or secret, that we heard of, and it is a silly but dangerous trick, for politicians 10 get in the habit of bandyug such accusation about, for temporary | DO object. The debt of the State is large, it has large precarously invested in Bank debts, which all parties sincere desiring to collect in the safe and speedy way, to be applied to the reduction of the State debt. and contends that taxation should be resorted to, supply the de6 cheney. For any set of men to contend that they ly are prophetcally wise, in knowing exactly the best modes and rates of co econs, and that all who differ from them few months as to the time, or a few degrees of per centage, encourage of State bank ruptcy and of the repudatIon of State debts, is piece of presumption which is very absurd in itsef and at the same time would be very dangerous, if, in this case its insncerity not conspicuous. There can, we hope, bat little mischief spring out of these wild deuunciations, winch their face in- clude leading of all parties in the State; and which, evelled at Col. TERRY, include among them, those who opposed and those who approve of his | nomination; and which are intended to benefit combination of partizans, in which are to be found many who went with him, as we'll as many who ' went against him on this vote.

 l 0U- The Florida election returns are not com plete yet. The Foridan, at Tallahasse complains of great neglect among the election officers in king the returns. As far ascertained the demo- cratic majority for Governor 49S and for Congress- I0s2, which will be increased by the accounts to come in.

 In the leg islature the majority ia larpe The gen-