{"newspaper_name": "Mississippi Democrat.", "edition": "01", "page": "pNone", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 989, "word_count": 167, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9413999915122986], "ccnet_perplexity": [1778.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Iowa Our readers viii recollect that
the Constitution adopted BY The Conven-
iion in Iowa abouta year since, on being
submitted 10 Congress, was SO changed by
contracting its boundaries, that The peo-
pie Of that territory rejected the insiru.
ment as amended. AT the session Of the
Legislative Council Of that territory, which
has lately adjourned, bill was introduced
to submit the Constitution 10 the conside-
ration Of the people, as il came from the


hands Of the convention. which was passed


but vetoed by the Governor. The Ccun.
Gil, Notwithstanding the veto, persisted and
passed the bill BY two.ihirds vote, which


made il law. Should the Constitution
thus presentcdto the people be adopted
BY them, i will be again presented IL
| Congress, and we see no reason 10 believe
that that body will change the conditions


upon which i declared Iowa should enter
/ Tho Union. flour bcliefprovcs wen found.
Cd, The only result 70 Iowa win bs DELAY
land expense, lNsR Orleans BRlletm.