{"newspaper_name": "Litchfield enquirer.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 936, "word_count": 159, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9362999796867371], "ccnet_perplexity": [1814.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MR. EDITOR Permit me through the medi- um of your column, to say, that have ascertained to my full sGfisf faction, that the Ladies pointed out in the Response to " Cyfherea ,Sempey,n pub- lshed in your last. and thereby implicated as be- ing the assfhors of Valentine under that sign0- ssre, too scandaious for a ialy to have any cogn- zance of whatever. are entirely innocent of any P0rtipatiOn or ks,o,ciedge in the natter and are, ndought to be auliy exonerated from any impnta- tion of being participantsin the transaction. And mat they never would have bean suspected had | mot. as supposed, positi0e evidence that such was the case. s

 !" Cgthesea Sempers is. therefore, requested to she thinks not appIIcSDre ro5nef sris Ii- tribute it among her Hecafe co,npnnions, who helped her engender so chnste production, with my congratulations upon her being so copiousy la vored by the .Muses. s

 AUTHOR or REsroNsE Co CykhseG SemPeT.