{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 5188, "word_count": 924, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9259999990463257], "ccnet_perplexity": [1543.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
tend TO change their restdence on the ut' OF Nay vi"
h9e a, by handing notice Of such removal as early as
possible, rs book is no" opr" ~ 'Ho O'"'' t'i '
thcm.


u-he Courier and the Constitutional Conven-


ton.


From lae Courier q Friday.


The radical Why's the AbolI,onsts. Bsrn-ourners and
.nt Renters alone desire Convention ROW that The
s ~ .bst thev are far moro Democratic han he co-Rco
nfy, To demonstrate this, they intend to make the
Chancellor Judges Of the Supreme Court and
,pdIcja, officer the State. elective oy the Pcople


From The Tribune Of Saturday.


WIS. Convention may do in the premises, have Of
eurse no means Of knowing but the charge against The
friends OF Convention that they Intend any such Thing


From ne Courier Of M9ndoy.


Tur PROPOSED CosvESTIoS.-The Tri5uas denies tha,
one the objects OF the proposed State Convention
10 alter Constitution as 10 make the Judiciary elective
while the Morning fenS frankly admits that such Is the
intention Of those who advocated the The
denial OF the Tribune worth nothing and are CON-
pcsd believe that the Editor must be that Il s
10 Certain Il IA. that when In Albany last week.
versed freely with those who advocated and voted for
tie Convention Bill passed the Assembly and we did
not In solitary instance meet with individual who old
not either directly that such the oe Of lis on
yinators, admit that such would be The result OF Con-
venton How Is II possible. them for the Tribune to make
in good faith the which il has this subject
Surely the Editor OF that Press should and we doubt not
does know the intentions OF those who have advocated
and sti advocate Convention and II his denial Of
those intentions very unJustifabe But hgnoran
Of the make the judiciary elective he certainly
win deny that such will probably be the consequence OF
the proposed Convention.


is- We ask our readers to scan the above para
graphs closely, and see how and why j, is that we
are driven into continual controversies with the
Courier Here we, and those with whom we act,
embracing nineteen-twenteths of the Wing Mem
bcrs of the Legislature, firs accused of intend
ing TO cut under the Loco-Focos, TO out demagogue
them, and show ourselves more Democratic than
they are, by making the Chancellor and all Judges
elective by the People. Wesimpy deny the charge.
What does the Courier next! Does 1t retract the
aspersion Not at all But how does it attemp,
10 sustain it BY quoting Loco .Foco paper, which
processes 10 approve Of some such scheme as the
Courier charges upon us, and untruy stating that
the Morning News frankly admits that such is
the intention Of those tcho hare adrocated The meas
are" Now the News admits nothing OF the
kind. 1t simply gvessas o,cn approval ofsome mea-
sure Of the sort, and is very glad to hear Qrom the
Courier that some Wings are Of like mind. though
il gives little credit TO the statement The News is
but an eleventh hour labsrer in the Of Con-
vention hardly qualified TO speak for the Reform
ers of iis party and does not pretend to speak
for those of ours. And yet such is The evidence on
which the Courier is compelled TO believe that the
Editor" of The Tribune is aware of the worthless
ness Of his Saturdays denial


Let us here restate that we do not assume TO pre-
Judge any future modification Of our Judicial sys-
TEN, or predict what Convention will or will not
do. That will depend very much on the kind of
Delegates the People may send to it; (; and as there
is nothing of patronage or power at stake-nothing
10 excite cupdy or stimulate 10 fraud-we cherish
lively confidence that majority OF good men
will be sent, and thas tl,- Constitution will receive
decided improvement at their hands. ,i.,.Ia ,hese
antcipatiops be bighted, we shall look to the Peo
pie 10 reject the abors of their agents. Whenever
we are conpelled TO fear that the People of New
York will originate and sanction perncious and
unjusthable alterations in their fundamental law,
we shall look ou. refuge in Russia or Egypt.


The charge of the Courier that "the radical
Wings" "inttnd' to make The Chancellor and
Judges elective by the People, in order to prove
themselves more Democratic than the Loco-Focos
we again pronounce utterly uniounded If the
Editor OF the Courier heard any talk of this sort
Albany we challenge specifications and names
This is no private matter, and II any Wing has
dared 10 contemplate sopatry and knavish game
as this it is the plain duty of every one cognizant
OF the facts TO expose him. But we repeat that no
Wing Of any character or standing has contemPla-
ted any thing of the sort. We do not know, nor
pretend to know the "intentions" of all who advo-
cate Convention; but we know they are almost
as various as the minds which entertain them But
we find in this no cause of aam-qulte the con-
trary. The collision of mind with mind, OF theory
with theory, Of truth with error IN the discussion
and maturing of Unconstitutional Amendments, cannot
fail to exert salutary influence in advancing and
diffusng knowledge with respect TO the science Of
Government. And in the final resul, it will doubt
less be found that All Natures difference makes
all Natures peace