District Chancery Court of ik Sias q


Mississippi. at Holly Sp7irgs
{"newspaper_name": "Holly Springs gazette.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2889, "word_count": 519, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8974999785423279], "ccnet_perplexity": [1855.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
District Chancery Court Of ils Si4H #


AississiPpi. at Holly Sg7irg,


Dabney II. Hull, Al Ruu
| 4S5 VS. Isl MONDAY q.


James NJ. Strong ct al Angus. 1855
UPON opening the matters Of this 3B, 3
appearing lo the satisfaction OF lhs Cala
that the defendant James A KaoX, I l-
an inha 5itant Of The State Of Mississippi t..
resides beyond the limits thereof 50 aE
the ordinary process Of the Count esuaot Il
served on him.


Therefore it is ordered thar unless hi
said defendant appear before he YES
Chancellor at the Court room IN BOY
Springs, on the first Monday Of January
next, and plead. answer or demur. 10 as
Complainant's Bill, lhe several alsgal5a
thereof as 10 him, will be taken for eol.sa.
ed. and such order and decree made therein
as shall appear equitable and Just. Aad
is further ordered thar copy of this oEtsi
be inserted in the "Holiy Springs GaIsis
newspaper published in The town o. hoN
ly Springs, Mississippi, once week l'i
two months. successiyely.


JAMES &. AL DERSON, C9k


ABSTRACT.


CHARGEs, That on the 4lh April l5i4.
Compl became the purchaser al Sheriff
sale, of tract of laad. known and desigua'
led as section one, township two, Raag'
two, west of the Basis Meridian, ChlckasaH
Cession, which was levied on as the PEof
ertv of defendant Strong. under ludgmsa
of the Circuit Court of Marshall County
rendered 10Th September 1889 that Comp
received deed therefor. ghich Is Of re''i-
in the proper Office.


That more than two years have eiaP''.'
since the purchase of Compl, and lha' lsE
;her Strong nor his creditors, are enillisl y
redeem said land.


That defendant S:rong's wife, on the zaa
July 1889. executed to defendants jams
T.. MooTing, deed of conveyance Tor ss'
ond section Of land. which deed, comp.
charges 10 have been fraudnl9pnni, Sirong TO-
as fo the e--Iis1I Vi 0trongi AIat - a..
lended thereby to screen and Pro'eC2. - 4.
prvP~-tv from sundry judgments Wu.s" =.
TO De rendered against hln y -, -
then approaching .erm of the CIIcuh -
of Marshall County. 10 VIII September -
1889, at which term the judgment uaa''
which Conpl claims title, was rendered


That Comp's title is likewise els..;1 -
bv deed for said land. executed oy So
Mooring & Jones. to defendant William ~. !.
Taylor, on the 9th May 1910 that 1 ly..
was fully assured of The fraudulent eaa.ss ,,l...
ter ofthe conveyance BY Strong 10 ''s
ing & Jones. rulo, sn


That after the conveyance to Iayiot -.
execution in favor Of defendant hnoS' r. e. !.
levied on said land as the property = "a
Ior. the sale under which was enJoi1e''
he Injunction is still pending. ,..--,pd


PR1YER. That the deeds from Sifongi i.asr Ig
wife 10 Mooriog s. Jones, and BY ihs ;s ;s'.s .
% Taylor. be decreed to be null aea ih.,lbsY sy'1
Tar as they affect CompPs title. ana o,ss u, d
Be cancelled. and said land fully '''
Compl. DrproN Crk


C. L. THOMAS. S0t'r.


Sept. 20 lS45-n5-2m.


- -