Correspondence of the Richmond Enquirer.
{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2666, "word_count": 470, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9646000266075134], "ccnet_perplexity": [1020.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
WASHINGTON tlTY, Jan. IA. lS4O

 The Baltimore papers of re day will tell you all publicly known, as yet, relative to the bioodless termination oi the affair between Messrs. Yancey and Clingman. need hardly write, that it's result

 Is gratifying to both parties in Congress. Hf

 In the Senate, 10 day, Mir. Haywood, of North Carolina, introduced resolutions providing for the re- annexation OfTexas upon the basis of ihe Compro- mise of 17S7, and made able speech upon the question at large. He followed by Mr. More head, of Kentucky. in oppoilion. ul-t

 In the House, MT. Holmes, of South Carolina, opened the debate for The day. soon after that body went into session. Though took notes of his speech dare not attempt 10 sketch it for you, be- cause dstIust my ability to do it justice. It was surpassed by no speech yet made the question: When m print, rom under his hand, you will, doubtless, re-publis it, for il is replee with learn ing, staiesmanke views, vigor of thought and en- ! larged patriotism. Indeed I doubt whether, from the first Congress down 10 the present, any member the House Senate has ever made more able a. impressive argument than this of Mir. Holmes's, ii one hour. He was followed by Mir. w. J. Brown, Indiana, in favor of -anuex xation; and the latter b Garret Davis, of Kentucky, in opposition. That gs itlenan coming from the Athand District is re- ded as the mouihpiece of Mir Clay the question II speech was therefore interesting, as it is sup posed 10 have developed the views Of ''lhe Great Embodiment" It is now ascertaned, beyond doubt that many Southern and Western whigs will act ,n the question as Americans, not party men; will to the rescue of all worth living for in the try, mean of the compromise entered into at the formation of the Constitution, spite of Ihe fowns and threats of their Northern allies, who, had they been in public life in 1908, would have been found ranged side by side with Josiah Quincy and his com peers, the question Of the acquison of Louisiana, when Federalism title to boast of. it by no means ia now. One earthly reading every speech in opposition, delivered in the House upon this sub ject ai,er booking those made the same side, on the Louisiana question, must be forciby impress ed with the identity of feelings and principles ex pressed m each; though, of course, with such modi

 hcat'ons m the mode of expressing Federal views, as the great change in public opinion. relative ts Federalism itself, has rendered necessary. on the Alexander Hamilton thought and felt in tilnes gone by. The spirit that would have closed the mouth of the Mississippi s 1908, yct lives in the sounsils Of