ANNEXATION.
{"newspaper_name": "The Port-Gibson correspondent.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1423, "word_count": 256, "ccnet_language_score": [0.942300021648407], "ccnet_perplexity": [1629.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mr.. Webster, in lis late Boston speech


says: I'll is thought (it is an idea | d. not
say how well founded) that there may BE-


yeta hope for resistance 10 the consum-


nation ofthe annexation 81 Texas. En-
thusiastic applause can only say, for


ono, tl,~t ,t y oifuuid fa4i 10 my - -


have a vole on such a question, and


vote for the admission into this Union of
any State with Constitution which pro-


hIbts even The Legislature from ever
setting the boudman free, shall never
show my head again, depend upon il. in
Fanuel Hall. Tremendous cheering


But, gentlemen, suppose the case.
that in the ensuing session OF Congress
your members fairly and freely protest
against the ccnsummation- o annexation,
why how are we TO stand in Massachusetts I
How are we to stand in Massachusetts,?
Are we to have the gentleman who is I
nominated by the Locofocos the Govern
or Of the State, and to fight the battle /
under his auspices? By dissentions
among ourselves, and list Of several 9th
ef candidates, are we so to PROSTATE our
selves? While we are to sustain these
great principles in Congress are we TO be
lnsustained at home? No, gentlemen: /
but, | say again, that every man who
gives vote for any other man than
George n. Briggs, does, in that respect, i
all 10 his power TO weaken the authority /
with which his Representatives 10 Con>
5ress can stand up and protest any long.
sr against consummating annexation.