Common PIeas.


Before in ire TTishosAs~
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1350, "word_count": 243, "ccnet_language_score": [0.953000009059906], "ccnet_perplexity": [2305.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
JANM-Henry Eroen vs EixabsM Ordronaur H. "A.
Blankman and a. b Bianksnan. his was An action
brought the amount Of promssory note ior
$sooo dated 18Th June, is4s made payable ote order
ofa Mr. H. A. Blackman, In IL monihs otter date sirned
by the defendant, Mr. o., and endorsed by q Mr. III A
Blackman, and named B. Blackman The note bav
ing passed into the hands Of the plaintiff and not being
paid, action was brought 10 recover the amohnt The
note having been given, II was alleged in confederation
Of certain services, which duly peiforned by
A. Biackmsn, behalf Of the maker The defence put
IN was that consideration given for the notes and
50 OF was also put In in bar showing that there
Judgment obtained against Capt. B. Blackman, for
slo which had been assigned over to the defendants.
and pay ment Of certain moneys


Verdict for defendant


Before Judge DAILY
jan 24--The Court set In the second chamber when
his Honor Judge D called mp the case Of


Cdronne ~ WOOD Va Daniel ID. Nnh--Thls was an
acuon OF repevin 70 recover riano oyte tibes and
articles Of household furniture nem defendant |, ap
peared that plaintiff father wa, Indebted for the rent
Of premises No Greenwich strsst and ,hs, d;.ress
was M made under warrsn. when the properly seized
fraud had been resorted to by paIn Ths iury ceuid
not agree and we're discharged. 80 80