Justices Court,
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1948, "word_count": 335, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9700000286102295], "ccnet_perplexity": [1551.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



Mayor and Corporation Mr.. Rode.-Ths Yves suit
brought by the plaintiffs under the ordinances of the
city, for dealing second hand articles without license
the 25th Of January last, and for exposing for
sale more than IL inches from the front wall Of defend
ants store The defendant is clothier In Chatham st
occupy ing tive stores Nos. SO and %.


The Witnesses who laid the Information, rival
Chatham street just between the defendants two stores
For the first offence the penalty is $50for the second the
penalty is SIS


ISRAEL FELLoMAN the first witness for plaintiffs,
who testified that he clothier keeping in the store
No. 81 that the defendant dealt second hand clothes at
the two places above mentoned that he knew defendant
dealt in second hand Clothes because he the witness had
coat exposed for sale there that had been offered to
the witness for sale and that he the corporation
the 25th Of January On ossexamnation, the witness
acknowledged that he had had dispute with the de-
fendant but could recoect when occurred what
it about; and that the he and informed
that the defendant placed bis goods the door
conspicucusly to the Desss goods ON be-
ing to the advantage; and that though he had
given the information against the defendant for having
yet could say that the defendant actually did desl
in such articles the 25h of January because he
in his store


The CORPORATION ATTORNEY here abandoned the case
in ar the first complaint concerned and called
JscoB HiRscHBERe witness, who testified that the
defendant placed his goods about three feet beyond the
wall of his house. but that he had measured it;
not capen err and business at all except cothier;
that he kept at the place the last Witness and
went with the last witness to info against defendant.


The respective counsel summed up, and the jury
brought IN verdict for plaintiffs in penalty Of S. For
plaintiffs the Corporation Attorneys for defendant james
McGay, Esq