{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2515, "word_count": 429, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9763000011444092], "ccnet_perplexity": [629.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The editor of the Advertiser is narrowing the is- sue between himself and correspondents, upon the position taken by Judge DARGAK towards the sub. | treasury, to conflict about matters of fact. His correspondents affirmed that the Judge had declared himself opposed to the sub-treasury. The Judge | "authorized" US to state the course which he had really adopted-not at this place that place par tcularly, but throughout IL involves no opposition to the subueasury, but the contrary, a recogni. ton of the sub-treasury principle, as the settled principle of the party, actually recognized in practice, and the Judge further declared that he ready to vote for all laws necessary to give it full effect, even l to the extent of adopting the whole machinery of the repealed subtreasury bill of 1S40 parts of which he did not consider at all material or necessary. We make these statements deliberately, and affirm on the authority, that interpretation can fairly be put any thing said by Judge Dargan, at variance with the substantial accuracy of this de- | scription of his course.

 The Advertiser replies that il has ''the very best authority" to repeat, that Judge Dargan did &c., pulga, "declare himself in opposition to the sub- treasury" and that the position which he took this: "Thal he sorry when the bub-treasury bill was Passeu, anu was Biau Wheh U was iePeaieu'

 It is scarcely possible that there should not have been grave mistake in this; for all Judge Dar- aan's political friends know that he advocated and supported the sub-treasury, when it was issue in ls4O It IS impossible that this part of the speech can have been properly understood. The rest is equally in error. We have stated the substance of what our candidate has maintained, and affirm that on no occasion at Sepuga or elsewhere has he given countenance 10 the opinion, that he is has been opposed to the "sub-treasury.''

 The Advertiser wants Judge Dargan's ssignature'' to the statement. In opinion, the authority is sufficient it is, and they that question it, will not find any difficulty, upon an application made m the right quarter, 10 have this doubt resolved, if it is important to them. This is sufficient for the pres- ent The democratic party has no where complain ed of any want of zeal ability in Judge Dargnn to maintain all it's principles, and look with more amusement than alarm, upon this effort to show that

 they ought to have been startled at something which

 has been left to the sasacity of fwh'ggery to find