From Ms courpr. Of ue,traay.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2063, "word_count": 359, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9286999702453613], "ccnet_perplexity": [1571.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
1.-THE Tribune denies that the Wings arc In favor Of ne
form 10 our Naturalization Laws Gea


hundred times, IT would scarcely alter te iact. IL c'
scarcely forgotten the emphatic declaration upon
this subIec, made by SIR. Webster the sentiments c'
Mr. Bsrrien the OF the Convention IN Loa'a'
which has inserted in Its new Constitution clause
ing adopted citizens reside In the State ho years icr
before voting the ground which has bcei
taken upon this subject by nearly every wing press


out the country In the United states Senate the best men


M S partes agree that additional safeguards and resrc
tinns are demanded These facts are 10 us
quite Ms good authority to what are and what are not


Bhg principles would be the assertion OF The Tribune


fTf- How the Courier proves that the Whigs
are in favor OF restricting Naturalization from the
fact that the Loco- Foco Constitutional Convention
of Louisiana have required two years residence
after Naturalization before voting, we do not Sec
And were it true (Which il Is noD that I'm the u.
S. Senate the best men Of both parties agree that ad
donal safeguards and restrictions are Imperatvely
demanded" we do not see how that would help
the Courier. That paper has taken the ground tha,
some additional safeguards and restrictions" are
necessary, and that they arc to be attained only
through the action Of the Whig party. We, on
the other hand, insist that whatever acuonlsproper
in the premises will be most speedily ard surely
effected by keeping the mholc subject ont of the
sphere of party politics. The Couriers statements
establish our case and demolish It's own.


But why this cloudy verblagc OF "a Reform IN
our Naturalization Laws? ~ What does II mean
If it imply Nativlsrn, or twenty-one years resi-
dence before Naturalization, we say that 1t is not
true that the Wings favor it, and we appeal from
MIR. this or Editor that to the uniform avowals OF
the Wing party, through It's National and State
Conventions. Not one Wing press or Statesman IN
twenty has ever advocated any thing OF the sort