Wings ahead, 68. Locos do. last year, 25.
Net Whig gain 03.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 919, "word_count": 150, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8964999914169312], "ccnet_perplexity": [2094.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



Net Wing gain 83.


.N.w town added :. town tied Il AnRsut' disputed.
&C. Local causes operated largely in Nt~- York,
Kings ard Rensselaer, toprevent the choice OF Super
visors affording any test of party strength on Ma
,ional Questions. But for this, the Wing majority
of Supervisors would have been nearly and the
Wing gain over ONE HUNDRED! Three cheers
for the noble Empire State!


The six or seven small Counties from which we
have no returns have doubtless chosen majority
twenty at the outslde-cf Polk Supervisors. The
actual Wing majority of Supervisors elect is not
less than FIFTY but for Nativism i, would have
been no, less than SEvENTY-FIVE. New.Y York
is this day Tor Protective Tariff and against the
Texas Iuiqaily-is, in short, adccided Who STATE.
NEw.HAMrsHIRE, CONNECTICUT. NEw- YORK,
have nobly opened the struggle of 1916; will not
VIRGINIA, INDIANA and KENTUCKY emulate their
cheering example7