{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1359, "word_count": 262, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9473999738693237], "ccnet_perplexity": [1446.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
noticed In the reports Of the Liverpool market il sttrbu
ea 10 measure to the receipt OF accounts from the Uni
yea stating that the crop would not be 40 large


anticipated and would not exceed the yield Of he pre-


The Importance this repeal Of the duty oncotton wool
@ oe seen when the proportion the duty bears to the
m s oos. OF tne raw material is made manifest The duty
esIma.ed that 10th should be added to the 6i6h, in
si & 70 calculate the full amount Of duty paid upon
IT, pound OF cotton wool manufactured in the country
egnts OF penny per pound was, therefore, the
, palo upon cotton This duty fell with great seve
upon low priced ,tton being upon quality costing
80 per pound duty Of nine per cent? and upon that cost


pr pound duty OF twelve and half per cent,
one eight OF the first cost The derived by the
from this duty estimated have amounted
TO about f700,000 per annum.


The weekly returns Of the Bank of England Tor the
PAST SIX months, since the system went into
eperation show much greater uniformity of movement,
nan at any time previous The OF notes in
alton ont the 12d Of February, ls45 $40 $50 less
than on the 26h OF October 1874 II will be perceived by
the annexed table that the amount OF issued in Feb
uary was fl 3s 100 greater than the Issue Of October
iea4 but the mount hand in February f7 66 $40
greater than IN Octoher