{"newspaper_name": "Arkansas intelligencer.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 649, "word_count": 119, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9811999797821045], "ccnet_perplexity": [700.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In the case of the United vs.. Caleb J. McNul-
iy, the late Clerk of the House Of Representatives
ngains, whom the grand jury found a presentment
charging him with embczzIement, Mr.. Hobnn,
counsel for the accused. stated that his client was
not only ready but anxious for trial, and hoped
the court would take up the case during the pres
eut term as it would be most inconvenient and
extensive TO his client and his witnesses TO attend
at the next term Of the court. But the District
Attorney obecting, on the ground Iha. the witness
q for the prosecution could not be brought here
ia time and for other reasons the trial of McNui.
~ was postponed.