SuDeriOr Court.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1250, "word_count": 215, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9539999961853027], "ccnet_perplexity": [1683.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Chief Justice Jones' presiding.


DEC. lI.--Betfs Hustin Hcrafio G. LpermoTe.--
This was an action Of trover II seems that sale OF
liquors was made by the compliments as suctoncers
upon certain stipulated conditions among which was
that an approved would be required for any sum
exceeding o specified amount That the defendant pur
chased bill amounting to 1886 $4,000, and when called
upon for the note declined giving one, unless an al
lowance should be made to him, upon purchase made
lug complied WITH action is brought recover This
same has been before Courts in two instances
at one time jury could agree and at the other
the verdict wa set asideThe jury gave their verdict
for SLOTS - 100 for plaintiffs.


Michael O'Bren VS.. Ehphaz Spencer-The defendant
in this case sold the stock groceries in the premises Of
No 362 Cherry street. by virtue of distress warrant
for amount OF rent due. The complainant alleges that
the demand for rent unjust that he not in
arrears the time the levy made that the value OF
two hundred dollars worth Of groceries seized and
Sold for the collection of thirty dollars that they were
sacrificed without cause that the whole amount OF this
stock brought but $50 00 and suit now brought to
ecoyar-VerdiCt tomorrow.