Common PleRs.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2435, "word_count": 408, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9735999703407288], "ccnet_perplexity": [1561.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Before Judge ingaham.
SEPT Is.-THomas Collier rs. Robert G. Hanna-This
was an action OF trespass fer assault and battery
mitted by defendant plaintiff 7th June last. 1t
appeared that time in Spring the parties made bet
respecting the highly fashionable and nte resting game
OF tenpins depositing of SIS each, stakes the
hands of party named Weeks. On the 7th June last
the bet was lost by the plaintiff when defendant claimed
the amount The parties were all employed in the
ofdeendants brother "a merchant residing at 7s William
street,. The plaintiff employed in the capacity Of
cashier, and the defendant and Weeks as clerks.
On demanding the stakes the defendant told
they would not be handed until the bro.
ther came, when alteration took place, and
defendant used very violent and provoking language,
and eventually struck plaintiff the face and hurt him
severely, after challenging him to go into room to
fight out The defence up that the plaintiff had
first used abusive language towards defendant, which
provoked the assault in retaliation.


Verdict for plaintiff $3.50 damages and six cents costs


Patrick Cuban rs. james Cassidy-This was another
battery The parties live in Pike street. Defendant
keeps a Junk store and il appeared was convicted


time back at the Court of Sessions for receiving stolen
goods for which he sentenced TO the Penentiary;
and pardoned afterwards by the Governor At the
time OF the last election, it appeared that plaintiff
Cassidy moving about some Of the polls, and asked
How can that fellow vote not he pardonedSby the
Governor Defendant being of opposite politics. he
subsequently went to plaintiffs store which occasion
he assaulted him, as was alleged. The stands ad
journed


For plaintiff, John McKeon ESQ.,; for defendant J. b.
Scoles Esq


Before Judge Ulshoefer.


Daniel Hegencdmp rs. William Jones.-This was an ac
ton TO recover which had been seized under
an execution, by the present Sheriff. who it was alleged,
made an insufficient levy to satisfy Judgment obtained
by plaintiff, against parties named Trip Miller who
lived in S0h street and carried the business Of gro
in partnership The levy was made and the goods
sold in the OF TripP and is contended that
nasmuch as the property was cop coPaTnsIshp r; , properly
firms and that the Sheriff bound to sell the interest
Of Miller The proof OF the existence of the copartner
ship, is the main point at issue The case stands ad