WASHINGTON, January 81, lS45.

DEAR BENNETT -
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1684, "word_count": 255, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8870999813079834], "ccnet_perplexity": [1520.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
DEAR BENNETT -


Much anxiety is rife in our city in regard to the
anticipated course OF the Senate upon the Texas
resolutions passed by the House. The careful OF
both sides are in doubt, while the more sanguine
friends OF annexation confidently calculate on their
success. The most prevalent opinion, among the
canvassers of this question, is, that they will pass
ZION Of Southern wings, npalgrf the adverse report
expected from the COMMITTEE OF Foreign Rela-
tions, to which they were referred This commit
tee, whose chairman Is Archer, contains besides
two Southern wings, Berlen and Morehead, one
Northern whg, Choa,e, and one democrat, Bu-
chanan II is thought lha. Berrien may have
squirting towards favor of the bill, which
Buchanan will wurmy advocate; but Archer
and Morehead dead against it. The
following estimate. " defining the position Of
/, is worth The author is firm believer in The
pos age OF the resolution. He reckons:-


Democrats decidedly favorable: Woodbury., At
Colqueit, Lewis, Basby, Walker, Sewer, Ashley,
flanagan. Semple, Breese, Benton, Atchnson-
Is.


Wings undoubtedly favorable: Merrick, Foster,
Henders0u3
Democrats highly probable Haywood, Niles,
Fsirfield-3.


Democrats very possible Dix, Allen-2.
Wings very possible Johnson, Barrow, Jarna-
gin, BerrIen-4.


Per contra : Democrat unftnchingy opposed
Tappan, l. Wings opposed-Evans, Phelps, Up
h I'm. Ghoate, Bates, Francis, Simmons, Hnntng-
ton, Dayton, Miller, Bayaid, Clayton, Pearce,
Rlves, Archer, Map8um, Morehead, Crittenden,
White, Woodoridge, and Porter, 2l.


This gives d larger majority than the bill can
command, anyhow.


1t will pass, however.


remain, dear sir,


JUST WHERE AM.