From fhe Riclimond Eaa

STANDING OF VIRGINIA
{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1661, "word_count": 305, "ccnet_language_score": [0.916100025177002], "ccnet_perplexity": [1554.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
STANDING OF VIRGINIA

 1t wouldnot be uninterestinq to have a brief glance at the op press in other States, in relation dielslve and honorable ttiumpB init a few short extracts, evidend| it of the press on this subieel-I with the Whig papers. WepS| days ago, the sneering language pieyed by the New York Tr5uI ! ing of the defeat of poor WaoI ton. A Texas Wing seems tor vors at the hands of the Noa| The defeat of one of these rare sl to give universal joy to the Whol| ty North of the Potomac. Ind phia U. S. Gazette, ('true WEgl the following complimentary nd fishy" Newton:

 "WiHough6y .Nswfon.-Tho 2 Texas Whig, cannot but De grdII trHe WHgS. He left his party winter on the Texas question, cfrontery to denounce Southern voted against Texas, as traitos ests of the South. He wrote q some eighteen months since, reaI Whig party in Virginia, and ia' by hinting that their policy h honest. He has found by this il reanfS have no tears shed oV feat. D

 The Albany Argus contains criticism of its Whig neighbOr'

 "The Evening Journal says, al complexion of the intelligence very much with our anticipation for no favorable results from ' first fever of the Texas quesilol not likely to be disappointed III tation.' Indeedl This then \ the first fever of the Texas q if this is the first, what may DC the second stage2 If these li in the green tree, what Will De dry D ].

 Now look on the other slu ture. From Massachusetts to Democratic press, with one T !, pnans over the downfall oi cur good old State. They, VI rejoice at the conseerallon principles, and at the new imp imp annexation by the commanalnl y ginia. We subjoln a lew eAu good our declaration