MOBILE

Thursday Morning, May 15, 1895 Democratic Nomination.

 FOR GOVERNOR, NATH ANIEL TERRY,

 OF IlMESI ONE
{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2993, "word_count": 521, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9660999774932861], "ccnet_perplexity": [1229.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The proceedings of the Tuscaloosa Democratic state Convention, reported for the State Journal and Flag, cannot be given till tomorrow.

 It will be seen th't twenty-five counties voted n votes in Convention, and that St. Clair, l2 vOtes) Greene 6 voes,) Perry, 6 votes J and Mobile, t4 votes)-l2 more-Whch were present did n"t vote,

 The Mobile voIe was lnst because he county meet ing gave perempory instructions to vote for J. W |. mcCLUNG, without alternative, and the name ot MT. McCLUHG was withdrawn before The balloting, so that the Mobile vote was blank The other nine votes were withheld from causes that we do not know One oi the boilers was Mir. HARVEY of Greene, ed itor of the Greensborongh Beacon and after reading his explanation in that paper understand him as

 ttie as we did without il. It seems that he does not like Col TERRY-that he thinks majority of dem ocras in South Alabama would vote for 'sound inde pendent democrat, ,''-hs would, al least; but he dues not specify wherein he thinks Col. TERRY not sufficiently ''ssund' ln his democracy, we are yet without any explained for this disorgauzn ng m .vemeat.

 The Convention, without the dissidents and in. cudlns the blank vote of Mobile, cast seventy-eigh votes, out of l26, the number of full Convention upon the ratio established To these might be dded the votes of counties known 10 have appointed dele gates 10 the Convention. but which delegates did not attend, viz: Chamtels ,, Jefferson 2, Macon 2, Lowndes 2, aud we think Pike 2 and Coosa 3-l6 rnure, all of whom, beu-,r. vote for Col TERRY. There were probably other county meetings of which We are advised.

 It follows, summing up these votes in Convention and in the primary county meetings, not represented in Convention, that Col Terry was the cho,ce of 67 delegates in Conventions; and of 16 appointed but who did not attend. that ' votes given agal him, votes were blank and eight refused to vote and seeded total Terry s3; blanks, seceders and all others 19. The ascertained vote ol the democratic party, therefore, is than to for Terry.

 The counties not ncIrded m this ejaculation con- tain about one-sirth of the democratic vote of the State. They Barbour, Butler, Blount, Cone cuh, Covington, Coffee. Dale, Henry, Marion, Mon roe, Randolph, Russell and Walker, and he would be rash man who would venture to assert that a majority in these counties would not also prefer Terry.

 We make these calculations to shew how futi e the objection the alleged lhinness of the Con- venton as an exruse for not being bound by the ac- ton ofthe Coyention the decision of the party.- Fne-sixths of the party had expressed their opinions and four. hfths of these Tor he candidate nom. mated. II this be not satisfactory to the prefer ence ol the party, who into the Conven- tion assisted in forming it, il is idle to look for their support, since hostility seems have been pre-. determined ind, pendently of the Con ,ention, o any public reasons vel given.