Superior Court.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2390, "word_count": 422, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9631999731063843], "ccnet_perplexity": [1918.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Before Judge Vanderpoel


Der S-Theophiius Oiioer Us Joshua Fork and Rich
ard a. Characterization OF repevin to recover the
value OF a wagon seized by Chambers one OF the City
Marshals under an order of law for York II appeared
that in June 1874, plaintiff mortgaged wagon to York
for $500, made payable demand and gave his check
for Sl75 the Mechanics and Traders Bank and sos in
cash, contending that he had balance Offset in
rent out OF store in Division street. which due to
him Tor OIL &C. The wagon seized by York through
the Marshall and plaintiff brings suit the ground that
the wagon seized upon not the which mort.
gagged which mortgage he also alleges, was force osed.
Having tailed to prove that York had anything to do
with the seizure, he (Yorl discharged. The de-
fence put in for Chambers that he (Chambers had
been innocently brought into the affair in the discharge
was not settled Verdict for plaintfS5O damages and
the valae of the property assessed at $50.


Before Judge Oakley.


Deperna Chatham Theatre-This was an action which
was brought by plaintiff who is keeper Of the saloon of
the Chatham theatre to compensation for al
dant cutting off the pipes attached to the gas conduc.
tors which had been used in the saloon. II wss shown
that plaintiff hired the saloon connected with the thea
tire for of 500 per week, including gas-the pipes
used for conducting the gas into the saloon being
nected with the metre used for the theatre generally
action brought in the Marine Court by Deverna to
Deverna cast and having cut up the pipes subse-
quently, the plaintiff obliged to camphine in
lighting the same saloon upon which plaintiff brings
suit for the damages The defence set up that De-
verna not bound by the terms OF his agreement to
light the premises for Jessel Plaintiff put in testimony
in proof Of the allegation set forth in his declaration
support of the agreement between the parties for light.
ing the saloon Verdict for plaintiff $267 damages and
six cents costs. For plaintiff Mr. Sandiord For deen.
dant, Mr. James w Smith,


H. Fan Nostrand VS.. John S. Gustin-Action on a pro-
mssory note for $2l3 made by defendant in 1897. 1t
was put for Defence that suit should fail in virtue Of
the statute of limitations Promise Of payment made
ls42 was shown for plaintiff when the jury rendered
verdict for plaintiff full amount Of note with inte-
rest, SC.