{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1568, "word_count": 292, "ccnet_language_score": [0.961899995803833], "ccnet_perplexity": [1790.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
fuly prepared 70 prove. They then rssored 10 their
enohoats, or equibriam tanks, % they may b. more
properly designated and exhausted about hall their
power thus showing that required at least 1900 tons
Of their pretended power to M 100 tons Now II 1900
tons OF the supposed Of this dock lift but 100
tons now much exerted the Great Britain by her
egh tanks OF 1850 aided by say 200 tons from the end
noasi We sh uld say not to exceed 1900 tons and
traction Thus will be seen that by whatever state OF
facts this dock is tested the result 10 substantially the
same, and the proof conclusive and irresistible that,
great the and deep the water to ope
rate 1t is required to be- it does not possess three hs
the power claimed for il by its owners.


We may here be allowed to ask can any believe,
II Capt Hosken had been in possession of the whole
truh and not misled by Interpretations he would
have left behind him such extraordinary certificate,
dsproved is by the most irresistible testimony and
not even sustained by the statement of the Company
themselves7


With this full and fair exposure il will be seen dock
on this plan capable Of raising "a gun ship with her
mament, men and stores board, estimated to weigh
$500 tons gross, uhe foregoing estimates are nett weghp
would be required to be than four times large
as the present. and for which berth and depth of
Ter could not be found in any port in this country How
such structure can be in way excite jealou
sy much less our envy or malice, we leave inelli.
gent public to decide


BYORDER OF THE PROPRIETORs