InW COiIrIH.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2542, "word_count": 444, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9273999929428101], "ccnet_perplexity": [2009.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
suprRIoR CouRT.-WiNiam B. Wills VS.. Harlem Rail
,ai Co-Acon already referred to- brought 10 recover
damages for injury received in the car victory which
WA thrown over the enlbankmcnt at 54thst. owing 10
IN. sxls-tree breaking and number of persons incud
pr plaintiff more or less injured. 1t was cobtended,
among other things by plaintiff that the Victory was not
adapted the road having been built for the Erie Rail
road which Is six feet wide while the Harlem road Ike
oil other roads in the country with the exception OF the
Ere Ia but four feet eight inches wide. The company
contend that her width did Dure her the aXes and
wheels having been expressly adapted for the Harlem
road and thai the acciden, beyond human foresight
or control-The Jury gave verdict in favor of the
plaintiff sls4o being $40 more than the verdict on the
fr, trial which set aside on motion OF defendant.
an! the present trial allowed For plaintiff Messrs 5.
Sherwood End J N Taylor For defendant Messrs Chas
Sanford, Butler and OConor.


Btus 4 Kurton n. G. Lirfrmors-The defendant
purchased quantity of goods at auction OF paniS the
terms being & months credit on approved paper Inc
goods delivered to Mr. l. but he subsequently re-
fused 10 give endorsed note averrng that since the
delivery he had discovered that quantity OF wine which
hs had bought previous sale was near worthless,
and he claimed OFFSET. This the plaintiffs would not
allow They claim that del, ,ndant promised 70 give them
the endorsement Of f. T. Aldrich and not having done
the ghtof property in the goods snl remains IN the
and they bring action o Trover recover the value 1t
!, eohtended by defendant that ordinary action OF debt
only csu be brought, when offset may be shown ihe
question whether giving the endorsement was con"
tIios Of the delivery OF n" The Jury hought from


tsequent admission Of defendant 10 third party that
ush WAS tho condition. and gave verdict for plaintiffs
Of slO73 81 being amount This case WAS tried twice
kfure For plaintiffs, Messrs. J. W. Gerard and o.
sartevsn, for defendant Messrs. E. w Stoughton and
G. Harrington.


MARINE CouRr-Charles Norton vs. Bryce Einney.-
Action by seaman of Tie packet ship Queen oi the
West against the Chief Mate 10 recover damages Tor be-
hg struck severe blow without apparent provocatlon
over the nose or face with hard rope about three guar
srs Of an inch in diameter which knocked plaintiff down
md considerably injured him Judgment for paintf
30 and For plaintiff Mr.. K. Angus; Tor defend
tnl Mr. w Z R-the.