LAW Cnnrfs.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "pNone", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 942, "word_count": 170, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9495999813079834], "ccnet_perplexity": [1970.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
CIRCUIr CouRr-EmsnUei Burckic Isaac r. Eek
hart and o,hs-This case was tried once before aud
verdict given for plaintiff for upward of $1,000 but
sent back on appeal the ground tina; Mr. Eckhar had
been signer of the contract and not Of the
against which firm the suit is brought 1t is to
$40 630 being the estimated profits contract torpur-
chasing 100000 bushels wheat converting it into flour
snd delivering it defendants agent at Kingston T. c.
being paid the of every five bushels of wheat for
barrel of Hour which would leave half bushel and two
pounds of wheat profit every five bushels, beside
profit of 800 the otas of the wheat For defence
is contended that Mr. Eckhart (who the only OF
the defendants found in the State and whom process
has been issued) partner but agent of the
house of Gibbs & Co. The will be resumed on
Wednesday. For plaintiff B. Cutting and a. P. Grant
Esers. For defendant George Wood and II. Brewster
Es0rs,