Common Pleas.
Before Judge Ingraham.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1667, "word_count": 287, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9740999937057495], "ccnet_perplexity": [1473.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



SEPT. a2.-Rotert F. Hicks VS.. Charles M Terrey-
This action for breach of covenant. appeared
that the parties had been engaged in business
partners up to January, Sl5. 1t stipulated that
Hicks should convey and transfer all the joint stock
goods to Terey who to pay the debts OF the firm
said Terrey paying certain to the in
erest OF Hicks and holding himself liable for all debts
OF the firm during the existence of the copartnershp.
II appeared that after the dissolution of the partnership,
party named Bailey, who had transacted business with
the firm, (beg employed by them clerks) sued them
in OF the minor courts at Brooklyn for services and
recovered judgment for SIS, which defendant did
pay Plaintiff having paid the in virtue of the
agreement between himself and defendant to
recover the amount from defendant The jury will
der sealed verdict this forenoon


Before Judge Ulshoefer.


Richard Amos VS.. Charles IL. Haremeyer.--This was
action of covenant brought under the following cir
appeared that the 25th of March, ls4a
the plaintiff leased to the defendant farm in the town
OF Hackensack New Jersey for year. with the stock
Of cattle and farming implements with the condition that
the defendant to keep the place in good repair
was in at the time OF renting and keep the fruit and
other trees in preservation The plaintiff alleges that
the defendant broke the covenant in the lease by cutting
down and selling timber the place. not tling the farm
in husbandlke manner and doing other damages to
the farm and lays his damages at $1,000.


The defence that the timber was cut from neces-
sty for fuel and that other damage was committed.
Nr dict HE