{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2128, "word_count": 375, "ccnet_language_score": [0.97079998254776], "ccnet_perplexity": [863.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THE BANK COLLECTION BILL AND THE REPuDIAToRs-WHo ARE THEY!-The Dal-

 las Gazette is urgent for the defeat of Colonel TERRY, as the judgement of the people against repudiation, and republishcs. gravely. as matter for public reflection, not ridicue, resolution sad 10 have been adopted in earnest by mee ting al Ca hawbs expressing the fear that the election of Col. Terry would lead to "repudaton." They might just sagey saney express the fear that the eec ton of Terry would lead to low waters, short crops the army worm and the yellow fever. There is not man in the State more firm in his opposition 10 any thing that snvors of repndaon or that leads to II than Nathaniel Terry. His principles, his votes his repeated and emphatic declarations, are all as strongly in favor of the most rigid maintenance of the public faith, those of any other public man or can he.

 The whole foundation for the silly story is that he vo ted in the Senate against the collection law now n force; upon He avowed ground that his judgement it required too much he safely collected, and might by requiring too much, weaken the security ofthe debts and lessen the absolute sum of collections. Thi | difference of opinion with portion of the legisla ture, upon the expedience of the rate of collections best calculated to wind the banks up most speedily and safely, is the ground of the violent assaults o which these Dallas resolves are specimen.

 Did it occur to these excited gentlemen. when they were running this muck against Nat. Terry for that vote, as proof of dangerous leaning towards the doctrine of repudiaion, 10 count up how many in the State and who, would be included in this ban of prescription as repudiaiors in principle, of the debts of the State. Did they look into the jour aals of the legislature and take list of the public men, who having voted with Col. Terry on the test question, are liable to the same perpetual dIsquah cations from public trusts which they seeking to establish against him' Had they locked with some carefulness into these facts, we thnk they might have hsstaIed before they attempted to get sp such