{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 3084, "word_count": 524, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9708999991416931], "ccnet_perplexity": [1088.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Advertiser of yesterday re echoes ihe hows with which his disappointed brethren of the whig press assaed Mir. BAGBY, for his TLxAs move menls. They took Il into their wise heads that he cause Mr. BAGBY efficient in procuring the pas sage of the amendment to the solutions, that he was about vote in opposition to annexation. which has mol in the Senate a warmer or more thorough friend than himself TheT anger was correspond ing bud and yindiclive when they ined that thai very course of Mir. BAGBY had the effect of con- suIdatng the friends of Texas together, upon pro- position which secured majority for the measure, which could not otherwise have been tained the debate and vote sufficiently shew. IL is in the voca- ton of the wings vent their spleen upon Mr. BAG BY. He regards these outbreaks itlle he does the idle wind. He thoroughly disciplined against attacks of his political enenlies and knows very well now 10 take care of himself against all assailanls It is not Le wondered at, however, that he feels sitve under the assaults of persons belonging to his political party, not more sincere or earnest than himself m the of Texas, and as the event has proved, less sagacous in determining the best mode for accomplishing the object. whose intolerance oi opinion cannot Dt IeSudiHtu hOih iouu anu dHBi y personal attack, till they of the facts, about which they undertake to speak. Of this class was the Washington letter in the Richmond Enquirer, copied into yesterdays Advertiser, upon which we expressed some free opinions Saturday. Our read will perceive from the proceedings of the United States Senate, on the Sd, that did not misudge Mr. BAGBY, when we undertook, his behalf, to

 .L- llol l ,i,a iect and expresse with his characteristic drectness his own opinion ef the wanton abuse which had been heaped upon hIm.

 We also refer with pleasure to the letter of the same Washington writer, copied from the Richmond Enquirer of the 4h, admitting, unreservedls, that his previous assaults upon Mir. BAGBY were unde- served, and. taking them back in full; with Mir, Ritchies expressions of regret for having been led into this injustice.

 An important point to be observed is, that when Mir. BAGBY made bis explanation in the Senate, Mir. WALKER, of Mississippi, the subsequent mover of Mir Benton's bl as an amendment, stated distinct y that he preylously aware of Mir. BAGBY's position and of his purpose to sustain Mir Walkers motion.

 The whole movement was undoubtedly taken m ful concert, with the knowledge that the democratic party could only be united and TEXAS carried b, in cooperating Bentou's amendment with the bill.

 Under the SC circumstances, regret 10 publish what we are consra med ihnx the nasty. unneces sary and unuet communication by Pendleton, in this paper, written, is evident upon its face, without sufficient knowledge of the facts, and relying upon the rumors of hostile presses. But our regret is more that democrat should thus assault our dslin- guished Senator, than that any serious effect will be produced by such an attack.