{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 6439, "word_count": 1228, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9153000116348267], "ccnet_perplexity": [1965.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
M snes = st pore s9d says unless you eat the assh 0f


Sts M enh NOV, my bslovsd fepds Isay ihat If the


ss ee cG = % a ws Cshoics under


soften down hswssdss that th re- coud s do nisttks


S9 n1 hs B instead q .nd sesnng


here .ss Ss S porcn bss~ ssn you Ind


that e,pssa oSJf q a ~ ss ct


ss sos. s1'S s1ssd ,ss hath hy


his sacred !suntain Of ME and ol salvation, tst
10 S,vSs ShSs as;SSsndins f9 ss


bread ofssvarastins life But,oif It did not contain
eysrs,t,nS Syna w. Il G.nHGt can bsstoy II; and il il were
ass y


Ss e ai eating dwsss sss
and which must live becanse il Is written that he should
ny blood ndeed He~, Seovss s'i sads ssa asa
you what H. the meaning Of the English


ssiss sas:$ 9s.s
esrne.t and really does give What he lays he gives
the force Of human language remembcr hs il Here


making use Of an argumentsays "unless you eat the
assa e the son Of man. and rink blood you ahSl not
e ~ yoq ne that Aaeth nv flesh and drinketh my
iaa day for my flesh meat indeed and my blood is
with memorials they have nothing to
DO here becsnss our Saviour said explicitly my dish
and his blood drunk because it is meat and drink ;ndsX


He that eateth my flesh and drnketh nv blood hathe
IN him"-enother expression not inteigible unless


% neepors|s3 ans aY &s sf e Christ. n
cause can the individual man who eateth huI Chris. in him


SAVIOR the memorial and ~od be 'sSS
"a al no NOR tnan y would be true to say that picture


vR SodV q a, an gave to the world his
blood han life in Nm because woDl% % Se mos,IS


ne receive khe res: body Of Christ


the simple reality Of him that aceveh and Kim VIZ =
rsceivsd As the living father sent me- and live by
me-" Now. my beloved friends human lang could
not be brought forward forcbls and than
Z :: Ss:: S:: si;s ees AR They ass s;
shpweyon the living identity Of the real substance ofthe
Son Of God aud the etel nal father Now the Savior here
shows you the union that will between the receiver
o. the hOly eucharist and Him. by the coexisence Of
himself and his union with the father and yet you would
ten me my dissening brehren all this but meta


srsdrOp d wine that aaeih the one and dribk
him with the eternal Father we must give up the trth
Of theology, and cease to enquire or maintan the
my sterious, nsure OF che unity Nof the GodheaA-
from heaven" What bread has come down fJom
heaven7 We may say that the real body and blood OF
althoush it Messing given to US from the Father in
bsaS .h s ss
forever" Here then beloved brethren the point which
viour makes acomparison quite nellieble 10 the Jews
bstween the bread he will give and the manna Tor
the susensnce OF the sraeltes in the DESERT Now my
anime this point with me here what were the nature,
the properties end the qualities OF the mamma given
be heavenly food, because 1t descended from the
clouds It was called miraculous bread, because II was
peculiar in ITSELF and like no earthly substance and dos
aessed Of such variety Of tastes and Aayo thst it yas
agreeable and plea,an to the palate every individual
the ssviour Of the World contras this bread he
e his people Now let me ask you my beloved brethren


Catholic Church be compared with the mama Of the
Sewsi Can you say. with good conscience, that the
bread you receive at the mystic table, not Cathoc s
heavenly food. because you connect faith with il But
that is not the point ask you really say -
then that given to hs fathers In the desert And ifhe
ask You what that bread is made of-whether II was


the rising of the run least il should evaporate you will


tell bin, no but that yon connect it BY faith with the


to do with these connections by faith you talk about ie


at once, did this bread really down from heavS
sTe. be- ne S1ss
OH no, noniracles have ceased long ago-therefos il
cannot Re miraculous bread But the miracu
mystic interpretation Your bread not heavenly bread
the e Be
you your bread 80 remarkable for its qualities to
be suited to the taste and sweet to the palate Of
not such property and the Jew will at once
oqs %snps . .sRsTSs s 70 the breed Of ShF.
blasphemy, utterng only the Language enemies Of
Saviour therefore your Christ an impostor where
deem the character Of Christ Oh Church oi the sn
cient fathers come forth and if thy bread is superior
theJews Is descended from heaven
into the womb Of the Virgin there receiving flesh formed
by Omnipotence II Ia miraculous and much miracu
too miraculous to be believed my dissenting brethren II
is prodigy almost too great for humanity that the AL
form Of bread for our nourshment and consoaion Hes
all the qualities Of tastehas 1t the property of sweet


" hs On


Oh! ask the poor beggar who, bowed down by chill
penury, creeps forth from his owy hovel--osk him it
delicacies Of the earth and IT, alter parakpg he does not
return to his humble dwelling ready to drag rem
his heavenly father Hath all the sweetness Of the man
na Of the Jews2 Go to the colsters Of the Catholic
church, and those pure and holy virgins who hsvcre
have dedcaed their lives to God In those ssquesteed
asylums for the pous-ask them, and they will tell you
ceive the eucharist they have found il Of sweetness not
TO be comprehended by those who have not patake Of
the food So, now, we have here this bread Of
the Catholic and find that II IL miraculous than
the manna-more heavenly than the mamma that pos
sesses all the sweetness and more Of the bread Of Israel
Thus then, to vindcate the character OF this ,d-man
and his eterna existence belongs the venerable church
which stands forward the defender Of the divinity
the Godm These things he said in the Synsgorue
tesching in Capernaum Many therefore ofhis disciples
when they had heard this ssidth s hard saying who
csn nesr it There then dcuy in this doctrine and
proves s reality. They ask, How Saviour


ve US his flesh ~ bread 2" Very good and becahsc
they cannot comprehend IT, they reject It But let ask
wners the defence ofhe eucharist without It. Where
its dimculty In the belief that when take bread and
recoecing the last supper Of Jesus with his dsci
pies ideniy with the body and blood Of Christ What
reanty IS tnere IN this, be memorial Cnnho,


the likeness Of your child or yoursel


II you desire them to be transmhed3 There s no diff
there but mere lkeness-there IL NO reality The ca
holic Church takes bread and appeal to you you do
not hnd to be what our Lord promsedhs true body
that athnlica hold he docfrnn t.,