{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2462, "word_count": 413, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9811000227928162], "ccnet_perplexity": [602.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Anne xaton Resolutions as amended in the Senate were concuired in immediately by the House. The majority was large and the vote, with only one exception among the whigs and two among the dem ocrats, was strictly party vote. For annexation, l32 democrats; whig. Against annexation, 75 whgs; quondam democrats, of d faith which has been for time much suspected. A critical analysis of the vote by States and parties, which we have taken some pains to make accurate, appears in another article in this morning. paper.

 On the first passage of the resolutions through the House, elght whigs voted with the majority. The mover, Milton Brown, d wing, and he followed the lead Of Senator Foster of Tennessee, also a wing who had proposed the same resolutions in the Sem ate. These whigs differed from the main body ol their party, in desiring annexation at all, and from some wings, also protesting to desire annexaIion by admitting the constitutional power to admit by jolnt resolution, as well as by treaty, while some of then friends maintained the treaty to be the only proI mode. Yet when the Senate amended the joint res olutions, by taking away the for opposition, that they usup the executive powers of the President and Senate, and restoring lhs alleged right of the treaty making power to act in the question, the same prolessed Texas whigs in the House change their votes and vote against annexation. Foster in the Senate and Brown in the House, who admit ted the constltutionay of both modes, and propos ell that which some of their friends declared to be unconstut onal, voted against their own measure, because it was changed in d point, which ought, if they were sincere, to have made il acceptable to their friends, and more acceptable to themselves.

 There is, however, one honorable exception, to this yasceIlatlon among the House WHIGs, who de. sired to keep at the time, their appearance of friendship for TEXAS, and their connexIon with the anti-Texas party. Mir. DELLET, the representative

 from this district, represented his constituents faith fully, spoke the entiments of his Slae and main- taned his own personal integrity by voting solitary and alone, of the whig party for annexation. We honor him for hIs independence. It will be happy remniscence for himself hereafter, when opposition to Texas annexation will be remembered for re. proach, as the federalism is now, which opposed Lou isiana, and organised the Hartford Convention.