{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 4258, "word_count": 752, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9793000221252441], "ccnet_perplexity": [1307.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 chansed'' in relation our Price Current publica- tion ol Wednesday, notwithstanding the explanation in our paper of Thursday We'll we are nut gr eatly surp sed at that, for know lis hard convince n man against his will, but confess have known great man, easier satisfied.

 He made charge of "meanness," asserting that we had habiiuay published extras interfering N th his regular day, until his ''paence exhausted. g We answered that there had been but three extras previously issued from this office during the season two ol them days remote as possible from his, and the third six months ago on tue eUtn,ng of his day. He replies by saying that probably no other oc'asion offered when un, thing could be maie by t-whch is perhaps true, perhaps not, but has nothing 10 do with sustaining his charge that we ha- biiuav inleriered with him Though he may not have "clanged'' his views, he abandons the asser- | ton and confines his evidence of "meanness" to the insignificant allegation thai we issue extras sometimes for the purpose o( making money To this we offer neither defence nor denial-he is well come To all he make of it.

 1 To our assertion that the Advertisers commercial editor informed Of our purpose and assented 10 it, the answer is curons. He denies il, and says | "Our commercial editor was, 10 be sure, informed | of the intention of the Registers commercial editor but il was mt in the shape ofa consultation, dd our editor consent To it, or become party the rangeuent. On the contrary, he expressed his dis appiolniion, and the Register man, as satpO, then offered him the use of hIs "Staiemenl of Stock"-a favor which would noI have been tendeIed but in the hope ol queting the complaint which he knew he had given us cause Take. Ns v, thereore, tat aa person connected th s office conS,ntrd 10 the pu6

 icdtipn ot S Registers erfra, Cr was consulted m re- gard to it; and we also DENY specifically, that the matter was "arrangrd wi h the commercial editor o | lhls paper"

 Now th,s is plain language, and the only fault we have to find with is, that il is not Tue, The ad- mission made II that when the commercial editor Of the Advertiser objected, offered him favor or as it is called salyo, to induce him to cease his objection and this accepted Ii there can be d better definition of an arrangement, or better prooi of consent, we should like to it. And we think he thought 50. ul in transferring his price current 10 his new spaper he took spec, to strike out the Acknowledgement uf this 'favor' which Ihe conimer- cia editor of the Advertiser gave, and which IS allowed 10 have been offered and accepted consid- | eration for a simultaneous issue. What words would the Advertiser use in describing such acI ii prac- tised upon hnselfl We can imagine, but not use them.

 To refresh the memory of the Advertiser however l for we do not expect 10 "change" his views, we simply state that the avor,' instead of being prof iered 'salyo' by us, solicited the part Qf the Advertser carly Monday morning, and 6sfore seeing us, or indeed before had decided on any day for the issue Of our This request was subsequently made in person, and objected lU by at the time we had concluded to publish We'd nesday evening:-but we afterwards conceded upon the understanding that both publications should ap- pear in the morning. The issue oi sheet on Wednesday morning, therefore, was in consequence of this agreement and this consideration offered and accepted. The Advertiser nevertheless denes that they constitute 'arrangement. prove 'conSsnt. They prove at least, as think the public will agree, that we were not indsposed to make an ef- (orl to soothe any supposed of complaint, and To live in peace with neighbors.

 This and our former aric e will shew further that we never gave for the angry attack in We'd nesdsy's Advertiser, and also, that although we claim and when necessary will continue 10 exercise the ight of suiting publications to he fence of our customers, are probably quite as jar from taking any unfair advantage sf our conenl- l poraries as the Advertiser itself With these re- marks we disposed leave the matter, although the tone and temper of both the Advertisers arti- ces migh, have provoked more severe retort.