PROCEEDINGS OF THE LAW COURTS.
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2674, "word_count": 478, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9609000086784363], "ccnet_perplexity": [1683.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
SUPERIOR CouRr-Hdrgaret AeGorn rs. Geo. z. Green.
Mrs. Nc 1885, bought lots of land on the North sise
Of 25h street. between Lexington avenue and 4t avenue,
which she paid $4,000 Assessments were subsequently,
laid on them for building sewer in the vicinity, and IN
s4l Mr. Green bought ut Corporation sale for assess
ments one ofhe lots with small building upon It, for 400
years. paying assessment OF 3S which existed upon the
lot The prese: an action eecnent brought by Mrs.


c the property 1t being contended that 1t
was not bound for the assessments and that she was not
of its having been charged with SUCH On the part
OF e defence It was ayerrcd that the proceedings the
part the Corporation regular and according TO law
The Jury returned verdict finding that the plaintiff is en-
titled 10 repossession OF the property.


William B. 1Tiltis " y and Harlem Railroad co.
Mr W. with about 10 other persons, was passenger on
the Both Sept as: In the Harlem Victory, one Of the
oes Of which broke and the car was precpafed over
bank a. s6h street, The plaintiff with Others was seri
oy hurt and will recover 1t is said, tho use Of one
his He brings action for damages averring that
the Company bound to have good and safe cars &c
and the breaking showed that this was not such The
cise VIII be resumed this forenoon.


AHgpse HlkeaHy dRd irite, rs. John A. IL. Oppoten.-
Action for SANDER arising out Of defendant charging Mrs.
W. with unchasy previous 10 her marriage, (referred 10
yesterday nensI was asked for and granted on the
ground that n joint action could not be brought.


CorRr OF COMMON PLEAs.-Timo II. Main vs..
j. Gib5cRs J. WiLcor aHdJ PrtchdrG-The plaintiff sold
Gibbons Wilcox Co. the good will Of stand In the
fish market at Washington Market receiving for such $3.50
In cash. ard for $780, The action Is on the note-
For defence IL was concpded that Sir Prtchard not


partner and that value had been given for the note
the stands being owned by the CorporatonThe Court
charged II the usage 10 sell the good win OF
stand i, INNS. be considered Verdict for Plain
tiff. $3.50.


jams Hurt vs. James Gordon Bsnea-Acton for Libel.
arising out OF publication in the Herald on the 2ls Aug
last: in which the plaintiff charged with seiDS an In
former and also indirectly, Of having committed perjury.
Mr. Hunt Sunday officer, and the charges grew out
of complaints made by him against the Howard House,
TammaDy Hall and other places, for selling LIQUOR on the
sabbath The defence thar the article was fair report
OF what had taken place the Police Office which de-
MED. The case will be rcs uned this forenoon.


p-,r-e--,o-- ~, f,,,,,-r,rro, Trpsyv Crry Erv