{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1288, "word_count": 230, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9589999914169312], "ccnet_perplexity": [1119.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
TIE TARIFF AND MR. WEBsrER.-W hen Mir Webster, on d recent occasion al Faneui Hall, delivered speech on the expedtncy of ahandonng Oregon md all the country west 0i ine Rocky Monn- lains, he took occasion to praIse the existing Ia il and the expediency of building up nonled arisioc. racy. In the of hls remarks he stated as fol- lows:

 "We have been referred by the locofoco party To the great manufacturing towns Of Lowell, and SpriGg- field, and Dover; rul he would remark, that If the tariff be destroyed, those places and the rich mano- facfmers would not suffer Ihe most Il was the shop man uacinreis, the makers uf boots, and hats, and clothes, &c,, who would suffer; aud if ihe Iarih should be destroy ed, not of those who lived by their labor the beach, the anvil, could ist atmtipsmonh."

 This, as ia, as onr observation went, was laughed at as n specimen of the most arrant deuagogue ism. The able correspondent o he Union. "Bundelcund,' remarks upon this as follows:

 "Since reading Mir. Websier's assertion, have taken pains examine he tables of imports and ex- ports as far back as 1910 inclusive, in order see how much in value of boots and shoes, and how much Ill value ofhats, have been imported ino and exported from, hIs country; and find the result as follows, viz: