{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1362, "word_count": 241, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9348999857902527], "ccnet_perplexity": [2026.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
SUPERIOR CouGr.-LEwIs Il. GRIFFIN VS.. The MAYOR
CoNNoxALrY. SC. OF New -for%-Acuon 10 re over ia
,rar. arising from the block opposite that Of plaintiffs
premise At the White FORT being occupied by tie Corpo
ration as depository street manure. whereby the waite
Of platgns property deprecated. &c. This case tre-


rrc 20 vesierday)-wls concluded. II was shown that
Mr. Crlfn purchased, 1899. $50 and ISL II lots ioE
which he paid So n0o the dspoti for Manurebce opposite
as now at the timc and had been since le35. The
Court charged that the Corporation must have some place
TO deposit manure but II Is liable H. in doing 'oit
creates nuisance. The Jury must take into c0ts!dera
ton that the depot there at the time
OF plaintiffs purchase and that he had never made any
complaint Of il until the bringing Of this sst. Verdict
for Plaintiff. S35C0


Jean ANN FERREgs vs. JouS PEARcE ,Np OTHERS
Action Fjectct possession OF premises NO
2f7 Bowev being OF the six lots purchased by John
fcrrer deceased in 1894, a $4,000 for the SIX lots The
lot In question was leased. 1872 for 90 years but the
lessee in whose hands at the expiration OF the time
Henry Abel refused to surrender it, and action Is brought
bv plaintiff against the tenant 10 recover poSscsselI Her


tile was shewn to be good Verdict for Plaintiff, !or the
premises IS claimed III the declaration.