Fresdom and Slavery, weIe
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1404, "word_count": 251, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9217000007629395], "ccnet_perplexity": [1355.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
NEw-YoRK. has, therefore, the proud honof OF
furnishing one.half (ackiug one) OF The entire
force thai could be rallied from the Loco-Foco
ranks to oppose this open and undisgulsed pFossl-
tution of the power Of the Federal Government
this prostration of the interests and honor o. the
Free States to the extension and fertifc alton oi
Human Slavery. 1t is no light thing that CON-
pels a New-York Loco-Foco TO break the party
ranks, but this was strong enough TO do it-a
sign Of promise for the future. On the other
hand, all the Loco.F Focos from the twenty tive
other States gave but thirteen sotes for Freedom
-besotted Pennsylvania not one! while CoNNEc-
ricur and New JERSEY appear on the record as
advocates OF this most jniquitgus measure IN It's
most atrocious shape. Freemen of Connecticut! !.
will YOU not vindicate your fair fame next
April?


What will be the fate of this Joint Resolution
in the Senate we cannot foretcll. We hope 1t
will be defeated, but we have misgivings. HDK
from this State votes for it, as Dickinson certain
ly will, we hardly see how it is to be defeated.


1t will be seen if eosry Wing present had voted
Nav, tho Resolution would still have passed
Yeas ll2; Nays log. The only aesentees were


81. y R5s.Is Ssss Tenn as an"f'sza T. sSenss nd


Total 4-3 Wings, | Loco. The Speaker
Jones, Loco) only votes in case OF tie. full
vote could not have changed the result