For inc Rrpi.irr and InnrnaI.
{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2933, "word_count": 506, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9549000263214111], "ccnet_perplexity": [1396.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The papers of yeslerda, reveal the extent of the indignation and disgust that prevailed al Washington city during the time that Governor Bagby was deliy' erng his speech the resolutions for the annexation of Texas According to the evidence of d yer, pectable paper, his speech confuunded the Senhe-- ihe whig portion with astonishment-the democrats with indignation and disgust

 The sketches have ofthe speech singu- iarly barren in afiording inc reasons winch Mir. Bagy grounded his objections to the resolutions of the House of Representatives l read very vague dechnatiun about tle Consi,u, ion and Of his very ardent attachment for it-some professions of love fer the measure of annexation aGd some inlsOme compliments 10 Mr. Benton l have sought in vain for Mr. Bagbys for declaring the resolutions ot the House oi Representatives unconstitutional

 The conduct Of Mir. Bagby, however. has this grave consequence. li has deprived the friends of the measure ot the proud satisfaction that woul l have followed fom its adoption bv tne frank, open and manl, of the congress of the nation. Mir. Bagby $ vote controlled the decision Who can or wi say tIa, there has been the slightest trace of irankness, openness, manness in his confuct Had Mir. Bagby consitu iona opinions hostile 10 lhe adoption of the 'luions of the House of Re re seniatIves, he should have declared them long ago Why this system of cOnceament! Why is it hat the Senate and country are surprised!

 Let us concede that Mir. Bagby did hold opinions corresponding with those he uttered in his speech.- What can he say to the country 10 justify hIs vote!-- Can any man of decent sense be imposed upon by tne statement thal MT. " aiket's amehtmtnt matPs the slightest alteration in the constitutional aspects of the easel If the Presiden, shall think fit, the solutions of the House of Representatives will te submitted 10 Texas and become the rule I her ad mission 10 the Union. MT. Ragby then hy his vote authorizes he Presitien, violate the constitution.

 The President is made he arbiter of the mode in which nation should be incorporated wIth "ur own. confess that Mr Walkers amendment would have been far fol m dable to than either the luti"ns of the House of Representatives or the reson lions of Mir Benton taken separately. Concedng, however, that Walkers amendment was in itself un- objectionable, how does il obvate single objec- ton 10 the resolutions of the House of Representa- lives.

 In every point of view that can consider il | am compelled 10 say that by his speech, Mir Bagby was guilty of an abandonment o duy to the State of All abama. lle knew her will and he should have long since informed the State what his opinions were.

 II Mr. Rugby was sincere in that speech, his vote was fragrant abandonment of duty to himself. In no point of view has the Stae any reason to be sa- lsled with the shnffling conduct of it's Senator.

 PENDLETON.