{"newspaper_name": "Arkansas intelligencer.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1349, "word_count": 236, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9075000286102295], "ccnet_perplexity": [1498.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Tic Oregon question has become the theme OF
discussion in the July numbers OF the " London
Foreign Quarterly" and the "Ed'nburg kevlew.
They take different roads. and arrive at differ
ent result The Quarterly goes decidedly Tor the
British claim; predicts that our NEXT Congress
will throw out any occupation bill, because II
canno, be carried ont without war wIlh England
which, it saws, we have not the mems OF wag.
ing--haying "neither men, money, nor credit.


The Edinburgh Review takes more moderate
cround-ridicuIcS our claim to the whoIo of Orc.
con, though it does 70, appear 10 cIalm the whole
Of it for EngIand--and proposes TO compromise
upon the 10Th degree, with the advantage in favor
Iof England that the I9,h should cease to be the
boundary when it reaches the coast, and that from
tfttRc6 The boundary should be the sea. This
would give England the " hole of Vanconvcr's Is
hnd, &c. In the event of our refusing these


terms, it then proposes 10 settle the question by ar
biration.


We simply aIIude to the views Of the two Quar-.
tarhcs, 10 wing it to time to unrnyc tho positions OF
the question. In any event, wc repeat our ah'd'


ng confidence that the ADMINISTRATION will ''asscr'
and maintain all our rights TO the Oregon terrrto'
ry. aud that they will preserve aud upaod the s''
cred honor of their country. '--UHioa.


