SUPREME CoURr UNITRp SrArEs.-FEB. 20
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 649, "word_count": 118, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8848000168800354], "ccnet_perplexity": [1435.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
SUPREME COURT UNITED STArEs.-FBB 70, lS45.
% II Plat, Esq of New York, was admitted as
Attorney and Counsellor of this Court. No 81. The
United States appellant VIM. Marion ct al. This
argued by Mr. Attorney General for the appel
liant, and submitted printed argument for appeees
No. So WIN II. Mcfarland plsintIf in error, va VIM M
Gwinn This cause was argued by Mr. Coke Tor the
plaintiff in error and by Mr. Walker tor the defendant in
error.


FKB a. Is46No. n. Robert Brockett ct al sppeliant'
VIM Bracket ct al The argument OF this cause was
commenced by MIR. Nesle for the appellants, and cen
tinued by Mr.. Robert J. Brent for the appellees,