Common PIeas.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": "Before Judge DAILY."}
{"character_count": 1178, "word_count": 192, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9742000102996826], "ccnet_perplexity": [2011.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



FEB. 24-Lucy Cossous VS.. finn Proudfoo-This an
action brought to recover services
dered appeared ID evidence that defendant resided in
East Broadway, that on the 2st May ls4 plaintiff went
to reside Ia her house. that defendant being of
large property employed plaintiff in the collecting of her
rents letting houses and following up landlords warrants
and other services and occasionally in defendants ab-
sence acted the OF housekeeper and attended upon
defendants son; this situation OF affairs continued up to
the 9th of Sept 1884, when plaintiff delicately limited
defendant that gratuty for services rendered would
be refused she told by defendant that she
employed. Plaintiff Immediately made her exit and upon
mature calculation valued her services at the rate Of So
per month, this during the period above referred to
amounted to $237 and to which, with the interest
accrung thereon the present action brought For
fence was shown that plaintiff had been employ
ed by that while not otherwise she
she was never employed in any menial capacity except
what was essential to her own comfort Verdict this
forenoon w. Muloch, for plaintiff ; d. Graham, Jr, for
defendant.