{"character_count": 1796, "word_count": 309, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9861000180244446], "ccnet_perplexity": [2136.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
cotemporary history. That Mr. Calhoun had at that time and ever since, so far as he (Mr: Southard] knew. been regarded as one ot the most active and Zcalous friends of a bank and his notions against its constitu- tionality and expediency, were unknown to his fellow citizens. If the Senator was now correct m his statements, it became him speedily to write anew that period of tho his- tory of the country and of his own actions for there was general, and he believed uni versal, misunderstanding throughout the na- ton in regard to both.

 This is brief outline of MT. Southard's s re- ply to Mr. Calhoun's statement In that re- ply he entered more into detail, and referred to dates. The answer was irresistible.- There is, however, one branch of the state- mcnt that is untouched; and as there are some facts connected with it, of which have n personal knowledge, proceed now to mo- tice it. Attention to dates is requested.

 Monday evening. the 18th of February, lSl5. this city was filled with runsors respect ing peace, and they had assumed a form so tangible. that a paragraph appeared in the Intelligencer referring to them on Tuesday morning thea4th. On that day, other urgent business being taken up. tho hank bill, by general consent, wns laid on the table, but at whose suggestion does not appear. On Wednesday tho 18th, tho motion for indefinite postponement was ninde, as already stated, by Mir. Lowndes, not Mir. Calhoun, who roted against h. But the treaty having arrived hero on the 14th. itwas submitted by the Pres ldcnt to the Senate on the 10th besides, tn tho Intelligencer, published on the morning ofthc 10th, a dcRliotiicial paragraph appears (which paragraph may now be permitted tosny, was written by Mir. Dallas, then Secrc- tary ofthe Treasury) announcing tho treaty