{"character_count": 855, "word_count": 165, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9785000085830688], "ccnet_perplexity": [2091.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
rDlua fuuau Sue aspoated in thesS hanks thuD Git- uated ana HabIe t0 insolvency, would esk any can iid man 1o cay in which situation would the money be the most secuEoln the hanks or m the hands of inc people, managed by their State Legidatures9 It seems to me that no man can lay his hand on his breast and say that the money is as secure in the banks as with the people themselves. If the public money be intended for deposte ony in the possession of the States is safe If it never is to be returned, then it is also safe in the peoples own pockets.

 MT. Speaker; it seems unreasonable to me that the banks should use this public money, with all their lia- bltes to insolvency and their natural tendency to skn. and that, too, without profit to the Government when the same money may be safe in the hands Ot the people, and used to their own advantage.