{"word_count": 215, "character_count": 1827}
Anschließend an https://archivalia.hypotheses.org/55134 weitere Links:http://library.umassmed.edu/lsl_now/what-scihub-does-not-do"Yes, Sci-Hub makes research available. But Sci-Hub does not give researchers the opportunity to make deliberate choices about where they publish or help them advocate for their rights over their own intellectual property. Sci-Hub just provides one more way for people to avoid understanding how and why Open Access can and should work." Unsinn. Publikationsfreiheit ist kein Selbstzweck. Wer keinen zumutbaren Zugriff auf Forschungsliteratur hat, für den ist diese Frage nach dem eigenen geistigen Eigentum völlig irrelevant.http://crln.acrl.org/content/77/3/122.full"We need to work more closely with organizations like IFLA and promote their Guidelines for International Lending. Even if we merely share our stories with developing nations, they crave the knowledge, and we can provide them with our expertise, effective solutions, and advocacy models, as we are currently doing with public library ebooks." das ist doch mehr als albern. Sollen diejenigen, die Zugang brauchen, Jahrzehnte warten, bis träge und unfähige Bibliothekare den Entwicklungsländern beigebracht haben, wie sie unser kaputtes System implementieren?https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160316/10375733922/as-predicted-elseviers-attempt-to-silence-sci-hub-has-increased-public-awareness-massively.shtml = "As Predicted, Elsevier's Attempt To Silence Sci-Hub Has Increased Public Awareness Massively"Peter Suber einmal mehr zum Thema (Audio).Eine umfangreiche Bibliographie zu Sci Hub ignoriert wie üblich fremdsprache Beiträge (wie in Archivalia).“Sci-Hub is simply a more convenient library that doesn’t make you mess around with logins.” #sadbuttrue https://t.co/E5Dw5EFQ4B&#8212; Jaclyn Selby (@SeeJaxRun) 19. März 2016  