{"word_count": 122, "character_count": 1021}
Open-Access-Advokat Björn Brembs ist mit dem Stand von Open Access unzufrieden und verteidigt Sci Hub als wichtigen Akt zivilen Ungehorsams:"Essentially, in my experience, the only reply we ever got from publishers to our different approaches to reform our infrastructure, has been one big raised middle finger. Clearly, two decades of negotiations, talks and diplomacy have led us nowhere. In my opinion, the time to be inclusive has come and passed. Publishers have opted to remain outside of the scholarly community and work against it, rather than with it. Actions of civil disobedience like those of Aaron Swartz and Alexandra Elbakyan are a logical consequence of two decades of stalled negotiations and failed reform efforts."Siehe auchhttp://archivalia.hypotheses.org/54314Interview mit Elbakyan auf Deutsch:https://www.wired.de/collection/latest/sci-hub-gruenderin-alexandra-elbakyan-laedt-teure-wissenschaftliche-aufsaetzeNachtrag: Sicht eines Bibliothekarshttps://www.slideshare.net/RyanRegier/scholarly-piracy