{"word_count": 189, "character_count": 1377}
Dana Sutton's AN ANALYTIC BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ON-LINE NEO-LATIN TEXTShttp://www.philological.bham.ac.uk/bibliographydeserves a few more words. He's been compiling it for almost 9years, originally at his home institution, Univ. of CaliforniaIrvine, and then under the auspices of the University of Birmingham,UK when the University of California (to its shame) stopped providingthe website.  He's very responsive to corrections, suggestions, andadditions.The links are to freely accessible digitized Neo-Latin works (25,000+now). So books on a subscription-only database like Early EnglishBooks On-Line are not included.   The range of authors, subjects, andpublishing dates is enormous. In addition to primary sources, itincludes lots of 17-19th C scholarship done in Latin.The project is so important to my own research (early modern scienceand medicine) that the URL is bookmarked right at the top of mybrowser's favorites list. I just checked its updates of recentlyadded authors and works(http://www.philological.bham.ac.uk/bibliography/new.html) and found2 works by  Conrad Gesner that I hadn't known about. I find myselfrecommending the site to fellow scholars in many fields every week.I agree with Klaus Graf that anyone planning to create a database ofearly Latin imprints (which would certainly be useful) ought to startby talking with Prof. Sutton.Karen Reeds in SHARP-L