{"word_count": 40, "character_count": 985}
Open-Access-Feind Jeffrey #Beall hat seine umstrittene Liste unseriöser Open-Access-Zeitschriften ohne Erklärung vom Netz genommen.https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/01/18/librarians-list-predatory-journals-reportedly-removed-due-threats-and-politics http://retractionwatch.com/2017/01/17/bealls-list-potential-predatory-publishers-go-dark/http://walt.lishost.org/2017/01/missing-those-lists-never-fear/http://www.nature.com/news/controversial-website-that-lists-predatory-publishers-shuts-down-1.21328http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/01/mystery-controversial-list-predatory-publishers-disappears19.1.2017:https://debunkingdenialism.com/2017/01/16/what-happened-to-jeffrey-bealls-list-of-allegedly-predatory-publishers/Bei den Recherchen stieß ich auf einen etwas älteren Text von David Wojick, der zutreffend darauf hinweist, dass man "predatory" Publisher nicht mit Low-Cost-Publishing verwechseln sollte:http://davidwojick.blogspot.de/2016/09/predatory-versus-low-cost.html