{"word_count": 641, "character_count": 3967}
By Hillary Nunn with Rebecca LarocheElaine Leong's posting about paper's use as a medical tool inspired me to look more carefully at instances of paper in the Layfield manuscript, which Rebecca Laroche and I have been examining in this series. What I found was much more than I expected. It turns out that concentrating on paper highlights some of the embedded puzzles about recipe transmission that have been lurking in the College of Physicians of Philadelphia manuscript, and even in the Recipe Projects blog itself. My exploration also brings us back to Lady Honywood, proving once more Rebecca's observation that “one just has to take advantage of a name like ‘Lady Honywood’ if it’s given to you.”Rebecca and Elaine both have written substantially about Lady Honywood (or Honeywood) in Recipe Project posts before. This past March, Elaine pointed out that Joanna St. John's 1680 recipe book contains a remedy attributed to Lady Honeywood "for a cancer," where the medicine is spread on paper and then laid on the sore. Not surprisingly, Lady Honeywood's name rang a bell for me, since almost two years earlier, Rebecca had devoted two posts to Lady Honywood's presence in the Layfield manuscript. Lady Honywood's recipe for the gout, Rebecca showed, hinted that the compiler of the CPP manuscript's second section had a particular need to treat that ailment since seven cures for gout appear there.But it turns out that Elaine and Rebecca were talking about the same recipe, or so I found out when I searched for mention of paper in the CPP manuscript. While St. John labels the recipe as a cancer treatment, the Layfield manuscript identifies it as "The Lady Honywood: receite for the Goute, running &#38; swellinge."[1]The Layfield manuscript mentions the concoction's effectiveness against cancer as an afterthought, but it is nonetheless there – as is paper as mode of administration. The ingredients are identical as well, with two notable variations. First, the Layfield manuscript walks the user through the process of rendering juice from its herbal ingredients, while St. John begins with the juices:Otherwise, the only difference is that St. John's version calls for "bean flower" while the Layfield manuscript calls for "wheaten flour."The variation in recipe titles is not uncommon, of course, and it certainly highlights Rebecca's point about the importance of local needs in the organization of these manuscripts. At the same time, it underscores how easily categorization schemes can obscure connections among texts and contributors. Lady Honywood and her recipe, variant title or no, forge a connection between two manuscripts, the St. John and the Layfield, that otherwise show no obvious overlap. And, ironically enough, a search for paper helped bring to light what had been an unidentified link within this very blog. The overlap between manuscripts, and the one between blog entries, hints further at what connections lie just beyond the reach of our current digital tools. Just more evidence that we need a searchable database of these manuscripts!Notes:[1] Below is a transcription for the Layfield hand:Rx. one handfull of Fetherfew, salladine, smalledge, &#38;Rhew, of each a handfull, pick them cleane, wash them &#38;drie the water out cleane, &#38; beate them in a mortar verysmall, &#38; then straine the Juce of it into a dish, &#38;thicken it with wheaten-flower; &#38; put into it theyelke of anew-laid egg, &#38; as much honey as [that] con-taines too, all beaten together, &#38; spread it vpon capppaper, or Grossers browne-paper, &#38; apply it to theplace pained; &#38; as the paine remoues, or moues sofollow it with this medicine -2. this same also will helpe the Ague in a womans breastor any bruise, the bloode beinge setled, or kill a felonor the Kings euell, if it be swellinge or runninge.If it be runninge lay adrie peece of paper vpon thesoare, &#38; the plaister vpon it, by Gods blessinge it willdo all these cures