{"word_count": 465, "character_count": 2833}
By Rebecca Laroche with Hillary NunnIn my last entry (06/08/2013), I related the short tale of my British Library disappointment. On the upside, in not finding conclusive evidence toward the identity of the compiler of the marvelous manuscript at the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, I only had to read a letter and determine the difference of hands, which was but a matter of minutes.I was left to pursue another link to the Layfield manuscript, one that was, perhaps more fruitful, if only slightly more conclusive.At page 55 of the Downing half of the manuscript appears the following recipe:To dry roses to put in sweete baggsTake the best damask rose leauessifted clean and lett them lye ii houresafter a broade upon a table then takeorace, storax and Beniamin beatento powder, of each a like quantity thentake a wide mouthed glasse &#38; therein casta layer of roses &#38; a layer of powdercrush them down hard and sett them inthe hott sunne till they be dry &#38; crisp, sotake them out &#38; put them in your baggeprobatum per Dnam YeluertonThe British Library contains an extensive manuscript of more than 1300 recipes (yes, I did count) owned by one Margaret Yelverton (BL Add MS 28237). On its 186th leaf, the manuscript records various recipes for sweet bags, pomanders, and the like.  None of the recipes for sweet bags is exactly as recorded in the Layfield manuscript. One, however, "To make sweete baggs for Linnin" (fol. 186r) has several of the same ingredients and seems to be a more developed version of the Philadelphia one, but adding a few more perfumes and using an alembic to dry out the flowers rather than relying on the sun.What does this convergence tells us?Elizabeth Downing's position as a medical practitioner/recipe collector (12/03/2013) was paralleled by that of her contemporary Margaret Yelverton, as well as by that of their contemporary, the Countess of Exeter (09/04/2013).The purpose of the sweet bags, though not described in the Philadelphia manuscript, was to perfume linens.The recipe from the Layfield manuscript is for a more refined sweet bag, as another in the Yelverton manuscript "To make sweet baggs with little cost" (fol. 186r) does not have the more expensive storax and benjamin, but rather the more common cloves and cinnamon.In turn, however, the Philadelphia manuscript tells us little about of "Dnam Yelverton," as it is not clear if "Dame" in the manuscript refers to an actual lady or to a housewife. Four other attributions hold the title, three other times thus spelled.  We cannot even be sure if the Yelverton recipe came directly from the source or through a third party (though third parties are noted elsewhere in the manuscript). What the manuscript does reveal is an extensive early seventeenth-century network of women of varying status and capabilities.