{"word_count": 730, "character_count": 5666}
Brown, Andrew. « Un contexte institutionnel et politique défavorable au mouvement syndical », Chronique Internationale de l'IRES, vol. 156, no. 4, 2016, pp. 21-33.Bowornwathana,  Bidhya, “Thaksin's model of government reform: Prime Ministerialisation through “a country is my company” approach”, Asian Journal of Political Science 2004, 12:1, 135-153, DOI: 10.1080/02185370408434237Callahan, William A., The discourse of vote buying and political reform in Thailand. Pacific Affairs, 2005, vol. 78, issue 1, pp. 95–113Camroux, David. « Douzième coup d'Etat en Thaïlande », Le Monde diplomatique, vol. 724, no. 7, 2014, pp. 21-21.Camroux, David. « Thaïlande : la démocratie des riches n'est pas celle des pauvres », Alternatives Internationales, vol. 62, no. 3, 2014, pp. 21-21.Case, William, Populist Threats and Democracy’s Fate in Southeast Asia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia, London: Routledge, 2017« Etat d'urgence dans le sud de la Thaïlande », Le Monde diplomatique, vol. 618, no. 9, 2005, pp. 7-7.Hawkins, K. &#38; Selway, “Thaksin the Populist?”, J. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. (2017) 2: 372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0073-z(type of populism, leadership style)Hewison, Kevin, (2010) Thaksin Shinawatra and the reshaping of Thai politics, Contemporary Politics, 16:2,119-133, DOI: 10.1080/13569771003783810Hewison, Kevin, Reluctant populists: Learning populism in Thailand, International Political Science Review, 2017, Vol. 38(4), pp. 426  –440Human Rights Watch, Thailand: Not Enough Graves: The War on Drugs, HIV/AIDS, and Violations of Human Rights, Juillet 2004Klein, James R., “The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand : A Blueprint for Participatory Democracy”,  The Asia Foundation Working Paper Series, 1998.Kazmin, Amy (2007) A Setback for Thai Democracy: The Rise, Rule and Overthrow of Thaksin Shinawatra,Asian Affairs, 38:2, 211-224, DOI: 10.1080/03068370701349284Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, and Alex M. Mutebi. “Thaksin Triumphant: The Implications of One-Party Dominance in Thailand.” Asian Affairs, vol. 33, no. 1, 2006, pp. 39–51. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/30172637.Kurlantzick, Joshua. “Democracy endangered: Thailand's Thaksin flirts with dictatorship”, Current History; Philadelphia Vol. 102, Iss. 665,  (Sep 2003): 285-290Laothamatas, Anek, “A tale of two democracies”, in Taylor R.H (dir.), The Politics of Elections in  Southeast Asia, Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1996 Laothamatas, Anek, ทักษิณา-ประชานิยม:ความหมายปัญหาและทางออก (Thaksin –Populism: meaning, problems, and solutions), unpublished research report for the King Prajadhipok’s Institute, 2006McCargo, Duncan and Ukrist Pathamanand. 2005. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: NIAS Press Mc Cargo, Duncan, “Populism and reformism in contemporary Thailand”, Southeast Asia Research, Volume 9 v(19), Number 1, 2001, pp. 89-107 Mc Cargo, Duncan, “Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crisis in Thailand”, Pacific Review, 2005, vol. 18 (4), pp. 499-519.Mérieau, Eugénie, “Anti-election discourses. On Populism and Vote-Buying in Thailand” in Eugénie Mérieau (ed.), The Politics of (No) Elections in Thailand, Bangkok: White Lotus, 2016Mérieau, Eugénie, Les Chemises rouges de Thaïlande, IRASEC, 2013Mérieau, Eugénie. « Comprendre l'instabilité politique thaïlandaise : constitutionnalisme et coups d'État », Politique étrangère, vol. automne, no. 3, 2014, pp. 135-149.Nelson,  Micheal H., “Thailand and Thaksin Shinawatra, From Election Triumph to Political Decline”, eastasia.at, Vol. 4, No. 2, December 2005 DOI: 10.17477/jcea.2005.4.2.005Ockey, James. “Thailand in 2006: Retreat to Military Rule.” Asian Survey, vol. 47, no. 1, 20Anurag Mohanty. “Doing Good Routinely? The Rise and Rise of Thaksin Shinawatra.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 40, no. 30, 2005, pp. 3262–3263. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4416929.07, pp. 133–140. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2007.47.1.133.Pasuk Phongpaichit &#38; Chris Baker (2008) Thaksin's populism, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38:1, 62-83,DOI: 10.1080/00472330701651960Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. “Thailand: Fighting over Democracy.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 43, no. 50, 2008, pp. 18–21. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40278285.Phongpaichit, Pasuk &#38; Baker, Christopher John. ""Business Populism" in Thailand." Journal of Democracy, vol. 16 no. 2, 2005, pp. 58-72. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0034Pathmanand, Ukrist. “The Thaksin Shinawatra Group: A Study of the Relationship between Money and Politics in Thailand.” Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13 https://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/cjas/article/viewFile/2165/2161Phongpaichit, Pasuk et Chris Baker, “Thaksin’s populism”, in Kozuke Mizuno et Pasuk Phongpaichit (eds.) Populism in Asia, Singapore : NUS Press, 2009, pp. 66 – 92Prasirtsuk, Kitti. “Thailand in 2009: Colored by Turbulence.” Asian Survey, vol. 50, no. 1, 2010, pp. 203–210. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2010.50.1.203.Przeworski, Adam, ‘Democracy as a contingent outcome of conflicts’, in Jon Elster, Rune Slagstad (dir.), Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Sinpeng, Aim et Aries Aruguay, “The middle class and democracy in Southeast Asia”, in William Case (ed.).,The Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian democratization, London : Routledge, 2015, pp. 102-116THEPKANJANA, PHONGTHEP. “THAKSIN ON TRIAL.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 89, no. 1, 2010, pp. 163–164. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20699842.Thomson, Mark, “The Moral Economy of Electoralism and the Rise of Populism in the Philippines and Thailand”, Journal of Developing Societies, Vol 32, Issue 3, 2016, pp. 246 -269