{"word_count": 1369, "character_count": 11258}
ArgumentaireL&#8217;appel &#224; contribution est ouvert pour le congr&#232;s international CAA2014 - Computers Applications &#38; Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (http://caa2014.sciencesconf.org/) qui se d&#233;roulera &#224; Paris du 22 au 25 avril 2014.La date limite du d&#233;p&#244;t des propositions est le 31 octobre 2013.Plusieurs s&#233;ances seront consacr&#233;es aux ontologies et aux standards pour l&#8217;interop&#233;rabilit&#233; des donn&#233;es relatives &#224; l&#8217;arch&#233;ologie (voir la liste des sessions dans le lien ci-dessous), notamment la session S7&#160;: &#171;&#160;Ontologies and standards for improving interoperability of archaeological data&#160;: from models towards practical experiences in various contexts&#160;&#187;.Descriptif de la session S7&#160;La documentation relative &#224; l&#8217;arch&#233;ologie - programm&#233;e ou pr&#233;ventive - et au patrimoine culturel induit des besoins d'interop&#233;rabilit&#233; s&#233;mantique et technique consid&#233;rables, tant pour la pr&#233;servation de l'information que pour le partage et l'enrichissement de la connaissance. D&#232;s lors, la construction d'ontologies sp&#233;cifiques &#224; l'arch&#233;ologie et &#224; l'histoire de l'art et l'utilisation de vocabulaires normalis&#233;s semblent des approches incontournables que certains chercheurs ont d&#233;j&#224; explor&#233;es (CAA Perth 2013, sessions 4, 5 et 6).Pluridisciplinaire, l'arch&#233;ologie produit des documents et des donn&#233;es h&#233;t&#233;rog&#232;nes et relevant de domaines vari&#233;s. Afin de tirer le meilleur parti des mod&#232;les conceptuels de r&#233;f&#233;rence et de leur transposition dans les standards, un &#233;quilibre est &#224; trouver entre les approches g&#233;n&#233;ralistes, qui favorisent les &#233;changes transdisciplinaires, et sp&#233;cialis&#233;es, qui pr&#233;servent les aspects propres &#224; la recherche en arch&#233;ologie (contexte, incertitude, incompl&#233;tude, &#233;volution des m&#233;thodes d'analyse, r&#233;visions de datation, &#233;chelles spatiales diff&#233;rentes, subjectivit&#233;, observation et/ou interpr&#233;tation, attribution, etc.). L'utilisation d'ontologies et de normes pour le traitement de l'information relative au patrimoine culturel (CIDOC-CRM/ISO 21127&#160;; Europeana Data Model...), de l'information spatiale (INSPIRE, ISO 19115, GML, GeoSPARQL, etc.) ou de langages and de th&#233;saurus (OWL, SKOS...) constituent une base d&#233;j&#224; &#233;prouv&#233;e mais peut-&#234;tre insuffisante.Lors de leur impl&#233;mentation dans des applications d'enregistrement, d'&#233;tude et de gestion de donn&#233;es arch&#233;ologiques, les divers standards et mod&#232;les conceptuels utilis&#233;s devraient garantir aux arch&#233;ologues le choix du niveau de repr&#233;sentation de l'information, depuis l'&#233;chelle de l'op&#233;ration jusqu'&#224; celle des continents. Afin de faciliter l'appropriation des langages et des principes de construction des ontologies par les sp&#233;cialistes du patrimoine culturel, il conviendrait de montrer ce que pourraient &#234;tre des r&#233;alisations propres &#224; leurs domaines. Il s'agira donc de pr&#233;senter des normes, des mod&#232;les, mais aussi des outils &#233;labor&#233;s sur des standards reconnus et d&#233;j&#224; adopt&#233;s par la communaut&#233; scientifique et les institutions culturelles. L'utilisation et la r&#233;utilisation des donn&#233;es arch&#233;ologiques, encod&#233;es de fa&#231;onnormalis&#233;es, et des m&#233;tadonn&#233;es largement accessibles, suscitent &#233;galement plusieurs axes de discussion&#160;: l'int&#233;grit&#233; des donn&#233;es arch&#233;ologiques, les risques de mauvaise interpr&#233;tation, le niveau de qualit&#233; des donn&#233;es enregistr&#233;es, les besoins en labellisation des donn&#233;es, les niveaux de sp&#233;cialisation dans la description des donn&#233;es et de g&#233;n&#233;ralit&#233; impos&#233;s par l'interop&#233;rabilit&#233;, etc.L'enjeu du recours aux ontologies et aux standards est de permettre l'interop&#233;rabilit&#233; et une diffusion large, mais ma&#238;tris&#233;e, des donn&#233;es arch&#233;ologiques et du patrimoine culturel dans le contexte g&#233;n&#233;ral de la diffusion de larges volumes de donn&#233;es ouvertes (big and open data). Pour traiter ces questions, la session a comme objectif de pr&#233;senter des cas pratiques d'utilisation d'ontologies et de standards. Les aspects trop th&#233;oriques et difficilement transposables seront &#233;vit&#233;s. Les communications pourront se focaliser sur les points les plus pratiques dans la construction d'ontologies, de mod&#232;les et d'applications, &#224; partir de retours d'exp&#233;riences analys&#233;s, et sur des outils disponibles construits sur de telles approches. Enfin, les communications pourraient permettre aux divers acteurs de la recherche arch&#233;ologique et du patrimoine culturel d'identifier et d'&#233;valuer ce qui peut leur servir s'ils souhaitent s'engager dans l'utilisation de standards favorisant l&#8217;interop&#233;rabilit&#233; et la diffusion large de leurs donn&#233;es.-Site web du CAA2014 et d&#233;p&#244;t de proposition&#160;:&#160;http://caa2014.sciencesconf.org/-Liste des sessions, tables rondes et ateliers&#160;:&#160;http://caa2014.sciencesconf.org/conference/caa2014/pages/CAA2014_list_of_sessions_V1.pdf-Site web du&#160;CAA International&#160;:&#160;http://caaconference.org/&#160;Argument&#171;&#160;Ontologies and standards for improving interoperability of archaeological data&#160;: from models towards practical experiences in various contexts&#160;&#187;&#160;:The documentation and data of archaeology - planned or preventive - and of cultural heritage, lead to the need for technical and semantic interoperability. The development and the use of ontologies, standards and languages devoted to archaeology intend to facilitate the integration, exchange and sustainability of cultural information. Some researchers have explored these approaches during the previous CAA (Perth 2013 sessions 4, 5 and 6 ).Archaeology, and its documentation and data, are multidisciplinary and heterogeneous. In order to make the best use of conceptual reference models and their implementation in standards, a balance must be found between general approaches, which allow promote interdisciplinary exchanges, and specialized ones that preserve the unique aspects of archaeological research (contextualization, uncertainty, incompleteness, evolution analysis, review of dating, different spatial scales, subjectivity methods, observation and / or interpretation, allocation, etc.). The use of ontologies and standards for treatment of cultural heritage information (CIDOC-CRM / ISO 21127&#160;; Europeana Data Model ...), spatial information (INSPIRE, ISO 19115, GML, GeoSPARQL ...) or languages and thesauri (OWL, SKOS ...) already has a proven basis but it may be insufficient.During their implementation in recording, study and management applications using archaeological data, various standards and conceptual models should ensure that archaeologists can choose the level of representation of information, from operational to continental scales. To encourage the use by cultural heritage specialists of languages and construction principles of ontologies, works specific to their domains have to be shown. This will involve presenting standards, and models, but also tools developed on recognized standards already adopted by the scientific community and cultural institutions. The use and reuse of archaeological data encoded in a standardized way, and metadata widely available also raises several points of discussion&#160;: the integrity of archaeological data, the risk of misinterpretation, the quality of recorded data, the need for labeling data, the level of specialization in data description and levels of generality imposed by interoperability, etc.The purpose of using ontologies and standards is to enable interoperability and a large but controlled diffusion of archaeological and cultural heritage data in the general context of wide diffusion of big and open data. The session's goal is to provide practical use cases of ontologies and standards to address these issues. Theoretical aspects too difficult to be transposed will be avoided. Papers may focus on the more practical issues in the construction of ontologies, models and applications, from experience feedback analyzed, and available tools built on such approaches. Finally, communications will enable the various actors of archaeological research and cultural heritage to identify and evaluate, what can be used if they wish to engage in the use of standards for interoperability and wide dissemination of their data.Proposals GuidelineThe CAA 2014 Conference organizers invite proposers to read the paper proposal guidelines and make their submission accordingly (in English).Format:- Paper in a sessions (only Long paper sessions (LP)A conventional format session of related 20 minute papers with 5 minute question time. Papers should present new and ground-breaking research.A Poster is alsoo possible, indicate then poster instead of paper.- participation to a RoundtableA panel addressing a specific topic or issue, coordinated by one or more individuals. Presentations of the speakers will normally be followed by a discussant and general discussion.- participation to a Workshop:The conference will include a number of half and full day pre-conference workshops. Workshops will generally include practical work or other active participation of attendees above a technical subject with implementation of software and specific tools.- Proposal structure paper in a session :1 MetadatasTitle of the paperabstract of 300-500 wordsType (paper in a session, participation to a rountable/workshop)Topic = Title of the session (please choose one session)Comment2 AuthorsName, affiliation, mailing address and e-mail address of the paper authors(s)Corresponding author in case of numerous authors3 FileUpload your summaryHow to SubmitKey Dates :3 September&#160;2013&#160;:&#160;Paper call31 October&#160;2013 :&#160;Paper call closedWe look forward to receiving your Proposal. Please take an account&#160;and submit your proposal via the CAA web site&#160;http://caa2014.sciencesconf.org/If you have any technical problems in uploading your submission please send an email to&#160;caa2014-submission@sciencesconf.orgFor more information about&#160;Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology(CAA) please visit the&#160;CAA International Home PageWe look forward to seeing your Proposal and seeing you in Paris in 2014.The Local Organising CommitteeDr Laurent Costa, CNRS UMR ArScan, NanterrePr Fran&#231;ois Djindjian, Universit&#233; Paris 1 Panth&#233;on-Sorbonne&#160;&#38; UMR ArscanPr Fran&#231;ois Giligny, Universit&#233; Paris 1 Panth&#233;on-Sorbonne&#160;&#38; UMR TrajectoiresDr Paola Moscati, Research Director, CNR - Istituto di Studi sul Mediterraneo Antico, RomeDr H&#233;l&#232;ne Noizet, Ma&#238;tre de Conf&#233;rences Universit&#233; Paris1 &#38; LAMOPDr Sandrine Robert, Ma&#238;tre de Conf&#233;rences EHESS Paris &#38; CGH-TERRES, EHESS