.Nasheille. De-. |.
{"character_count": 2389, "word_count": 404, "ccnet_language_score": [0.951200008392334], "ccnet_perplexity": [2243.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
.NasheiHe, Der. |.

 1he Inspeachmeat.-X esterday at two (, o,ciecis, 2. Ii. the Court proceeded te de- liver their opinion in the case of Judge Haskell. The following are the articles et impeachment exhibited by the Mana gers on the part of the House of Repre- sentatiyes.

 .1fficfe ti5'st.--ssO On the trial of the caf- ses in the circuit courts holden by him as Judge, lie has egligently and illegally omitted, failed and refused te hear, attend to, and superintend the testimony given by witnesses, and to hear, attend t0, and superintend the argument of counsel upon such trials; but has ou the trlaI of such causes negligcntly and illegally departed from tife court, and of trial, left jury, wit nesses and counsel to proceed without lis presence, hearing, attention and sape rin- dence, and engaged in divers business, conversation and amusements, to the great damage of the State of Tennessee, ol the counties Tn which such trials were had and of the parties to the causes 80 tried. .'' Article second. Fl q has negligently and illegally omitted, failed and refused to have, and to hear read in open conrt, the minutes of courts in which Ire iIas presi- ded as Judge, and has, as a Judge, signed them as records of said courts, without having and hearing them read, and with ont knowing whether they were true or false ''

 Under the first article, there were eley- sn specifications, sett;ng forth the simes and places at which t..e lssag pond eat ~ as aliedged to nave been guilty Of the inisde- feeaanfs charged ID tue article. 0f,these yaeclaeatiUDs, tie 4tt, 9th, Stb, 9tii and 1etf5 were aeaAdoae ed by tha mabagois.

 2esa.-8tT. i4resideht, Anderson, Brah- sea 8arjerd, Fieid, Frey. lreeue, Hol- ,aails aIi Pelk--ee.

 Nags.-Nessrs. Andrews, Bradford, t1il- iespy, ,ietton, Lytle, 3I Iver, AIurray Per klas, and Nyly-s.

 On the ed, 5th and 1lth specifications the vote was the same as on the first.

 On the 3d, Nr. Bra son voted in the negative, making the nays IT.

 0n the 7th, tue aespondont was uuani- mously acquitted.

 Tle first specification of tue second ar. ticlc was abandoned, and upon the second the Respondent was unanimously acquit- ted.

 The constitutional pnfnhor llavinr failed to find the Respondent guilty on any one Of the specifications. 1t was ordered by the court ti'at he ke discharged and per- mitted Co depart hence without delay.

 Rcpndhcar.