FOR THE ADVOCATE.
{"character_count": 1541, "word_count": 268, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9521999955177307], "ccnet_perplexity": [1363.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Brindietoaon, fl. T. .aug.4, IS32.

 My DEAR SIR-By an act of the late session of Congress, we have two addl- tional Land Offices established: one at Washington, in Hampstead, and the other at Fayetteville, in Washington county. The creation of the land dis tricts to which these offices appertain, IS unquestionably a salutary measure, and will be attended with much con venience to the citizens residing in the southern and western parts of the Ter ritory. But, sir, with regard to the location of the office in the Fayetteville district, we think the Delegate has been extremely unfortunate. The lands sub- ject to entry at that office lie principally in Washington. Crawford and Pope From the eastern boundary of Pope. it is probably l30 or 40 miles to Favette. vile, while from the latter place to the western boundary of the Territory. is not more than IS or 20 miles. From the most southern par. of the land dis trict to Fayetteville, is largely upwards of 100 miles; while from the latter place to the Missouri line, on the north. is not more than 25 miles. It is true. sir, that Washington is populous and highly respectable county. But so are the counties of Crawford and Pope; and if the convenience and good of the people was the principal object of the Delegates ambition, why not select d more central position than Fayetteville? say Crawford c. H. or some other point in that county. Why, sir, the object is apparent: the Delegate is already po- pular in Washington county, received a liberal support from It's citizens at the