{"character_count": 1177, "word_count": 213, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9560999870300293], "ccnet_perplexity": [1746.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 1Ae Cherokee Case.--The prevalent opinion here at Richmondl seems to be. that the President will do his duty. and see that the laws be enforced; but, from the tone of the Court Journal, we have little expectation of this. If il be asked, ought the judgment of the Court to be carried into execution by arms? we retort the question, and ask what will be the consequence of failing to execute it? Will not the Federal Government be virtually dissolved? Is that, in truth, any longer Govern ment, which is too feeble to execute it's laws? We arc brought at once to the point-is it better to have recouse to the bayonct, to attempt to keep the Un- ion together, or to permit peaceable withdrawal of it's members; or, lastly 10 hobblc on like the old Confedeya- ton, each State obe,ing such laws as she liked, and disobeying others? It is plain that the condition of .ihe Govern. ment is at this moment, little else or lit tle better, than under the old Articles of Confederation; and now we trust ii viii nave become evident .to all men

 what climera consolidation is, and how much superior in force, the centri- lfueal power in the system is. to the eo,,I ..,,,et - !, ,yL.,ts