Saraqib chemical attack
# Saraqib chemical attack

vteSyrian civil war :

Timeline

January–April 2011

May–August 2011

September–December 2011

January–April 2012

May–August 2012

September–December 2012

January–April 2013

May–December 2013

January–July 2014

August–December 2014

January–July 2015

August–December 2015

January–April 2016

May–August 2016

September–December 2016

January–April 2017

May–August 2017

September–December 2017

January–April 2018

May–August 2018

September–December 2018

January–April 2019

May–August 2019

September–December 2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Background and causes

Casualties

Cities

map

Terrorism

Massacres :

The Saraqib chemical attack is an alleged attack that was reported to take place in Saraqib in Idlib Governorate in Syria on 29 April 2013. A further attack occurred in February 2018, during which, according to the United Nations Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Investigation and Identification Team (IIT), “at least one cylinder” of chlorine gas was dropped, spreading “over a large area” and affecting at least 12 Syrians on the ground. The IIT attributed the attack to Syrian government military, specifically the Syrian Arab Army's Tiger Forces.

## Attack

On 29 April 2013, a helicopter was seen passing above the western part of Saraqueb, a source close to the opposition claimed. The source said the helicopter was flying from north to south and that a trail of white smoke came down from the helicopter as three objects were dropped. According to the source, the first object landed in the northern area of the town, the second landed in the middle of the courtyard of a family house, and the third landed close to an opposition checkpoint on the road to $Idlib.^{:12,13,20,35–42}$

Around 16:40 a doctor at the Shifa Hospital was called in order to assist with two patients, a 52-year-old woman and her pregnant $daughter-in-law.^{:37}$

## Victims

The 52-year-old woman was severely intoxicated. She died between 22:30 and 22:45 just before arriving at a hospital in $Turkey.^{:13}$ Test results indicated that she had been exposed to sarin. Her daughter-in-law had moderate symptoms and recovered after 15 to 20 minutes of atropine treatment, but was also sent to a hospital in Turkey. She arrived at a border hospital at 19:30. She could then walk, but had, according to the medical officer, nausea and was $vomiting.^{:39}$

Other alleged victims with milder symptoms was also sent to $Turkey,^{:37}$ however, the examining doctor did not observe symptoms consistent with exposure to toxic $chemicals,^{:40}$ and initial tests of blood samples tested negative for sarin gas.

## Aftermath

The UN mission collected evidence that suggests that chemical weapons were used in the attack on "a small scale" against civilians. However, "in the absence of primary information on the delivery system(s) and environmental samples collected and analysed under the chain of custody", the UN mission "could not establish the link between the alleged event, the alleged site and the deceased $woman".^{:20}$

On 26 April 2017, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said the sarin used in the attack was similar to the sarin used in the 4 April 2017 Khan Shaykhun chemical attack and that hexamine was found in samples taken after both attacks. The French report directly linked the sarin to the regime.

