Military courts of the United Kingdom
# Military courts of the United Kingdom

Part of a series on :

British law :

Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom

Year

2023 

2022 

2021 

2020 

2019 

2018 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

2012 

2011 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

2005 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001 

2000 

1999 

1998 

1997 

1996 

1995 

1994 

1993 

1992 

1991 

1990 

1989 

1988 

1987 

1986 

1985 

1984 

1983 

1982 

1981 

1980 

1979 

1978 

1977 

1976 

1975 

1974 

1973 

1972 

1971 

1970 

1969 

1968 

1967 

1966 

1965 

1964 

1963 

1962 

1961 

1960 

1959–1950 

1949–1940 

1939–1930 

1929–1920 

1919–1910 

1909–1900 

1899–1895 

1894–1890 

1889–1885 

1884 

1883–1880 

1879 

1878 

1877 

1876 

1875–1870 

1869–1865 

1864–1860 

1859–1855 

1854–1850 

1849–1845 

1844–1840 

1839–1835 

1834–1830 

1829–1825 

1824–1820 

1819–1815 

1814–1810 

1809–1805 

1804 

1803 

1802 

1801 

Parliament (Session)

58 (1·2·3) 

57 (1·2) 

56 (1·2) 

55 (1·2·3·4) 

54 (1·2·3·4·5) 

53 (1·2·3·4) 

52 (1·2·3·4) 

51 (1·2·3·4·5) 

50 (1·2·3·4·5) 

49 (1·2·3·4) 

48 (1·2·3·4) 

47 (1·2·3·4·5) 

46 

45 (1·2·3·4) 

44 (1·2·3·4) 

43 (1·2) 

42 (1·2·3·4·5) :

Acts of Parliament and Measures by devolved parliaments and assemblies

Scottish Parliament

2023 

2022 

2021 

2020 

2019 

2018 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

2012 

2011 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

2005 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001 

2000 

1999 

Senedd Cymru (Welsh Parliament)

2023 

2022 

2021 

2020 

2019 

2018 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

2012 

2011 

2010 

2009 

2008 

Northern Ireland Assembly

2023 

2022 

2021 

2020 

2019 

2018 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

2012 

2011 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

2005 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001 

2000 

Northern Ireland Assembly (1973)

1973–1974

Parliament of Northern Ireland

1921–1972

Orders in Council for Northern Ireland :

Acts of Parliament by states preceding the United Kingdom

Parliament of Great Britain

1800

1799

1795–1798

1790–1794

1780–1789

1770–1779

1760–1769

1750–1759

1740–1749

1730–1739

1720–1729

1710–1719

1707–1709

Parliament of England

1700–1706

1690–1699

1600–1689

1670–1679

1660–1669

1642–1660 (Interregnum)

1603–1641

1485–1601

Before 1485

Royal statutes, etc. issued before the development of Parliament

Parliament of Scotland

Up to 1707

Parliament of Ireland

1701–1800

Before 1701 :

Delegated legislation

United Kingdom statutory instruments

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

1979

1978

1977

1976

1975

1974

1973

1972

1971

1970

1969

1968

1967

1966

1965

1964

1963

1962

1961

1960

1959

1958

1957

1956

1955

1954

1953

1952

1951

1950

1949

1948

1947

Statutory rules and orders

United Kingdom 1894–1947

Northern Ireland 1922–1973

Regulatory reform orders

Ministerial orders :

Devolved delegated legislation

Scottish statutory instruments

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Welsh statutory instruments

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Statutory rules of Northern Ireland

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

1979

1978

1977

1976

1975

1974 :

Church of England

Measures

Instruments :

Retained EU law

Decision

Directive

Regulation :

Acts of Parliament relating to the European Union (formerly the European Communities)

1972–present :

vte :

The military courts of the United Kingdom are governed by the Armed Forces Act 2006. The system set up under the Act applies to all three armed services: the Royal Navy (RN) (including the Royal Marines), the British Army, and the Royal Air Force (RAF), and replaces the three parallel systems that were previously in existence.

The military courts have jurisdiction over all members of the armed forces of the United Kingdom, and civilians subject to service discipline.

## Summary hearing by commanding officer

Most offences by members of the armed forces against service law are dealt with by commanding officers through a summary hearing. A commanding officer may deal with an offence by a summary hearing if the offence is minor, and the accused is of or below the rank of commander in the Navy, lieutenant colonel in the Army or Royal Marines, or wing commander in the Royal Air Force.

Examples of offences which can be dealt with by a commanding officer include being absent without leave (AWOL), insubordination, malingering, conduct prejudicial to good order, ill-treating subordinates, and various offences against civilian law, such as theft, assault, criminal damage, and careless driving. Offences which cannot be dealt with summarily include assisting the enemy, misconduct on operations (which includes a range of offences committed when the enemy is nearby, such as surrendering a position, sleeping on duty, and spreading alarm or despondency), mutiny, and desertion.

A person charged with an offence which could be dealt with by a summary hearing before a commanding officer has the right to choose trial by the Court Martial instead.

If a commanding officer dealing with an offence summarily finds the accused guilty, he can impose punishments including loss of seniority (for an officer), or reduction in rank (for a warrant officer or non-commissioned officer). For lower ranks, he can impose a term of detention in a unit guardhouse, or at the Military Corrective Training Centre (MCTC) in Colchester, of up to 28 days, or 90 days in serious cases, or a requirement to carry out extra work or drill, or loss of entitlement to leave. Alternatively he can impose a fine of up to 28 days' pay, or another minor punishment.

Often in cases involving ratings (Royal Navy), private soldiers (Army), and airmen (RAF) are delegated by commanding officers to officers commanding or, for the Royal Navy, executive officers (XOs) – usually a lieutenant commander (Navy), major (Army and Royal Marines), or squadron leader (RAF). To deal with minor disciplinary matters such as lateness, their powers are restricted to either a fine of seven days' pay, a fine of up to £50, or seven days' restriction of privileges.

## Summary Appeal Court

Someone found guilty of an offence by a commanding officer in a summary hearing can appeal against the punishment, or against both conviction and punishment, to the Summary Appeal Court. The Summary Appeal Court is made up of a judge advocate, an officer, and another officer or warrant officer. A case before the Summary Appeal Court is dealt with by re-hearing the charge, or reconsidering the decision on punishment. The judge advocate presides over the hearing, and gives rulings on matters of law; including practice and procedure. Decisions to grant or dismiss the appeals are made by a majority of the three members of the court. Further appeals on a point of law may be made to the High Court of England and Wales by way of case stated.

## Service Civilian Court

The Service Civilian Court replaces the three separate systems (for each of the armed services) of standing civilian courts which were previously established in Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands and Cyprus.

The court has jurisdiction over offences against service law which have been committed outside the British Islands by a civilian who is subject to service discipline, and which, if they had been committed in England and Wales, could be heard in a magistrates' court. Serious offences which, if committed in England and Wales, could only be tried by a Crown Court must be dealt with by the Court Martial. The Service Civilian Court consists of a judge advocate sitting alone.

If the court considers that the nature of the case, or the charge, is sufficiently serious, it can refer the case to be heard by the Court Martial. The defendant can also choose to have their case referred to the Court Martial.

Punishments which can be handed down by the Court include imprisonment for up to 12 months (or 65 weeks for two or more offences), a fine or community service.

Appeals from the Service Civilian Court lie to the Court Martial. An appeal is dealt with by the Court Martial by re-hearing the charge or decision on punishment.

## Court Martial

The Armed Forces Act 2006 established the Court Martial as a permanent standing court, effective from 1 November 2009. Previously courts martial were convened on an ad hoc basis. The distinction, applicable in the Army and Royal Air Force, between district courts martial and general courts martial (with the district courts martial having more limited sentencing powers than the general courts martial) was also abolished.

The Court Martial may try any offence against service law, which includes all criminal offences under the law of England and Wales. Procedure is broadly similar to that of the Crown Court in England and Wales. The court is presided over by a judge advocate, and there is a board (similar to a jury) of between three and seven (depending on the seriousness of the offence) officers and warrant officers. Rulings on matters of law, practice, and procedure are made by the judge advocate, whilst findings of guilt or innocence are made by the board by a simple majority of the members. For deliberations on sentence, the judge advocate is joined by the board, which is a distinctive and unique feature of the Court Martial.

The punishments which can be imposed by the Court Martial range from imprisonment in a civilian prison (for any period up to life if the offence warrants it), detention at the Military Corrective Training Centre in Colchester for two years or less, dismissal from the armed services (with or without disgrace), or an unlimited fine, down to those punishments available to a commanding officer. Someone who has chosen to have a charge heard by the Court Martial rather than summarily by a commanding officer cannot be given a punishment greater than the maximum available to the commanding officer.

When trying a civilian who is subject to service discipline, the Court Martial consists of a judge advocate, and a board comprising civilian members, who do not participate in sentencing; the judge advocate sentences alone in the same way as in a Crown Court. Punishments which can be imposed on a civilian by the Court Martial include imprisonment, a fine or community service, but not service detention.

## Court Martial Appeal Court

The Court Martial Appeal Court, first established in 1951, hears appeals from the Court Martial. It is mostly made up of judges from the civilian Court of Appeal for England and Wales.

Further appeal lies to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

## Judge advocates

The judges who preside over all hearings of the Service courts are known while they are sitting as 'judge advocates'. In the same way as other judges, they are appointed by the Lord Chancellor following a process conducted by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) or, in the case of the Judge Advocate General, appointed by the monarch. They are always legally qualified civilians solicitors, barristers, or advocates – of at least seven years' standing. A High Court judge may also sit as a judge advocate if requested to do so by the Judge Advocate General in a particularly serious case.

## Director of Service Prosecutions

The prosecution of cases which are not dealt with summarily is handled by the Service Prosecuting Authority, the head of which is the Director of Service Prosecutions (DSP), and whose role is similar to that of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in the civilian criminal law of England and Wales. The director, who is appointed by the monarch, need not be a member of the armed forces, but must have been a solicitor, barrister, or advocate with higher rights of audience for at least 10 years. The director can appoint officers who are solicitors, barristers, or advocates to be prosecutors. The current director is Mr. Jonathan Rees KC.

