Logocracy
# Logocracy

Part of the Politics series :

Basic forms of government :

List of forms of government :

Source of power

Democracy (rule by many)

Demarchy

Direct

Liberal

Representative

Social

Socialist

Others

Oligarchy (rule by few)

Anocracy

Aristocracy

Gerontocracy

Kleptocracy

Kritarchy

Meritocracy

Noocracy

Particracy

Plutocracy

Stratocracy

Technocracy

Theocracy

Autocracy (rule by one)

Despotism

Dictatorship

Military dictatorship

Tyranny

Anarchy (rule by none)

Anarchism

Free association

Stateless :

Power ideology

MonarchyRepublic (socio-political ideologies)

Absolute

Constitutional

Directorial

Legalist

Parliamentary

Presidential

Semi-presidential

Socialist

AuthoritarianLibertarian (socio-economic ideologies)

Anarchism

Colonialism

Communism

Despotism

Distributism

Fascism

Feudalism

Socialism

Totalitarianism

Tribalism

ReligiousSecular

State religion

Secular state

State atheism

GlobalLocal (geo-cultural ideologies)

City-state

Intergovernmental organisation

National government

World government

Nationalism

Internationalism

Globalism :

Power structure

Unitarism

Unitary state

Empire

Principality

Client state

Associated state

Dependent territory

Dominion

Protectorate

Puppet state

Puppet monarch

Satellite state

Self-governing colony

Tributary state

Buffer state

Vassal state

Viceroyalty

Federalism

Confederation

Devolution

Federation

Superstate

Supranational union

International relations

Small power

Regional power

Middle power

Great power

Superpower

Hyperpower :

Related

Administrative division

Democracy indices

Democratic transition

Autocratization

Democratisation

Hybrid regimes :

Politics portal :

vte :

Logocracy is the rule of, or government by, words. It is derived from the Greek λόγος (logos)—"word" and from κράτος (kratos)—to "govern". The term can be used either positively, ironically, or negatively.

## Historical examples

The United States is described as a logocracy in Washington Irving's 1807 work Salmagundi. A visiting foreigner, "Mustapha Rub-a-dub Keli Khan", describes it as such, by which he means that via the tricky use of words, one can have power over others. Those most adept at this are termed "slang-whangers", while Congress is a "blustering, windy assembly". Mustapha describes how:

   "unknown to these people themselves, their government is a pure unadulterated LOGOCRACY or government of words. The whole nation does every thing viva voce, or, by word of mouth, and in this manner is one of the most military nations in existence [...] In a logocracy thou well knowest there is little or no occasion for fire arms, or any such destructive weapons. Every offensive or defensive measure is enforced by wordy battle, and paper war; he who has the longest tongue or readiest quill, is sure to gain the victory—will carry horror, abuse, and ink shed into the very trenches of the enemy, and without mercy or remorse, put men, women, and children to the point of the—pen!"

The Soviet Union was described by Nobel Prize winner Czesław Miłosz as a logocracy. It was for example, according to Christine D. Tomei, a "pseudo-reality created by mere words". Moreover, after the revolution Luciano Pellicani describes how a "language reform plan" was introduced by Kisselev. In it he "stressed that the old mentality would never be overthrown, if the structure of the Russian language was not also transformed and purged."

This process led to a Soviet language that George Orwell would later dub "neo-language", and was a precursor to his Nineteen Eighty-Four Newspeak. The new Soviet 'language' was less a real language than an 'orthogloxy', a "stereotyped jargon consisting of formulas and empty slogans, whose purpose was to prevent people from thinking outside the boundaries of collective thought"—i.e. it was speech which destroyed individuality. Janina Frentzel-Zagórska, however, queries the importance of political language in the USSR, saying that "the old ideological 'Newspeak' had completely disappeared in the Soviet Union long before" the fall of Communism.

Totalitarianism, according to political theorist Hannah Arendt, can be considered a logocracy, since in it ideas are no longer important, just how they are expressed.

Academic Yahya Michot has referred to Sunni Islam as a "popular" or "laic logocracy", in that it is government by the word of the Koran.

