Same-sex marriage in the Tenth Circuit
# Same-sex marriage in the Tenth Circuit

Part of the LGBT rights series :

Legal status of same-sex unions :

Marriage

Andorra

Argentina

Australia

Austria

Belgium

Brazil

Canada

Chile

Colombia

Costa Rica

Cuba

Denmark

Ecuador

Estonia*

Finland

France

Germany

Iceland

Ireland

Luxembourg

Malta

Mexico

$Netherlands^1$

New $Zealand^2$

Norway

Portugal

Slovenia

South Africa

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Taiwan

United $Kingdom^3$

United $States^4$

Uruguay :

Civil unions and registered partnerships

Bolivia

Croatia

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Greece

Hungary

Italy

Latvia

Liechtenstein

Monaco

Montenegro

Netherlands:

  • Aruba

San Marino

United Kingdom:

  • Bermuda

  • Cayman Islands :

Common-law marriage

$Israel^5$ :

Minimal recognition

$Bulgaria^6$

Cambodia:

  • 68 communes

$China^7$

$India:^8$

  • Chandigarh

  • Gujarat

  • Haryana

  • Kerala

  • Odisha

  • Punjab

  • Tamil Nadu

  • Uttarakhand

$Japan^9$

$Lithuania^6$

$Namibia^{10}$

$Netherlands:^2$

  • Curaçao

  • St Maarten

$Poland^6$

$Romania^{12}$

$Slovakia^6$ :

See also

Same-sex union legislation

Same-sex union court cases

Timeline of same-sex marriage

Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa

Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia

Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe

Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas

Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania

Marriage privatization

Divorce of same-sex couples

Domestic partnership

Military policy

Adoption

Listings by country

LGBT rights by country or territory :

Notes

Performed in the Netherlands proper, including the Caribbean Netherlands. Registered in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.

Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.

Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.

Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.

Cohabitation. Registered foreign marriages confer limited rights. Marriage recognized in some cities.

The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens.

Legal guardianships (nationwide, except Hong Kong and Macau), residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents (Hong Kong).

Unregistered cohabitation or Maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.

Some cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, though not legally formalized.

Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse recognized for residency rights

Hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status

* Not yet in effect :

LGBT portal :

vte :

On June 25, 2014, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling striking down Utah's same-sex marriage ban, setting a precedent in other states under the Tenth Circuit's jurisdiction. In addition, on July 18, 2014, the same panel of the Tenth Circuit invalidated Oklahoma's ban as well. Both Circuit Court rulings were stayed pending certiorari review from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Tenth Circuit consists of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. New Mexico is the only state in the circuit where same-sex marriage was legal prior to the decisions. Utah is the only state in the circuit where same-sex marriage was temporarily legal after its ban was struck down. A ruling requiring the state of Utah to recognize same-sex marriages performed within the state was temporarily stayed and was originally set to expire on July 21, 2014, at 8:00 a.m. The Supreme Court of the United States extended the stay on July 18, 2014.

A federal judge struck down Colorado's same-sex marriage ban and issued a temporary stay that was set to expire on August 25 at 8:00 a.m. but was later extended. The same-sex marriage ban was also struck down in Colorado by a state district court judge and was stayed pending appeal. Following the circuit court ruling, licenses were issued in Boulder County, Colorado. Attorney General John Suthers declared that they would be invalid. After a state district court judge refused, on July 10, 2014, to order the clerk to stop issuing the licenses, the Denver County clerk's office began issuing licenses to same-sex couples as well. The clerk of Pueblo County began issuing licenses to same-sex couples the next day. The Colorado Supreme Court ordered clerks in Denver and Adams counties not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples even though Adams County didn't issue any marriage licenses to same-sex couples. On July 21, 2014, it was announced that Pueblo County would stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, yet Boulder County continued to issue licenses. On July 29, 2014, the Colorado Supreme Court ordered the clerk in Boulder County not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

On October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected petitions for certiorari from five states where same-sex marriage bans had been struck down, including Utah and Oklahoma. The same day, the Tenth Circuit dissolved the stays it had previously issued on its rulings allowing for same-sex marriages in those states.

On October 7, the Tenth Circuit lifted its own stay, at the request of state officials, on the case Burns v. Hickenlooper which struck down Colorado's same-sex marriage ban, legalizing same-sex marriage throughout all of Colorado. The Colorado Supreme Court also dissolved stays against several county clerks who were prohibited from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

On November 4, 2014, a preliminary injunction barring the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Douglas County and Sedgwick County from enforcing Kansas's same-sex marriage ban was issued. The Kansas attorney general contended that Crabtree's preliminary injunction only applied to the two counties and one state official involved in the lawsuit. However, many counties began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on their own initiative. The state government refused to recognize same-sex marriages until July 6, 2015, after the Supreme Court of the United States' landmark ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. By June 30, 2015, all 31 judicial districts and all 105 Kansas counties were issuing licenses to same-sex couples or had agreed to do so. All states and all but one territory are complying with the ruling, which set a precedent that same-sex marriage bans are unconstitutional. Kansas was the last state in the country to recognize same-sex marriages.

## Status of same-sex marriage

Same-sex marriage states :

| | State | Date Same-sex marriage went into effect | Date Same-sex marriage ban was struck down | Date Same-sex marriage ban was stayed pending appeal | Method |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | Colorado | October 7, 2014 | July 9, 2014, & July 23, 2014 | July 9, 2014, & July 23, 2014 | A federal judge struck down Colorado's same-sex marriage ban in Burns v. Hickenlooper and issued a temporary stay that was set to expire on August 25 at 8 a.m. The stay was later extended. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rulings in Kitchen v. Herbert and Bishop v. Oklahoma set precedents for entire circuit. Enforcement stayed in initial rulings pending petition for writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court. In addition, a Colorado state district court decision, Brinkman v. Long, No. 13-CV-32572 (Colo. 17th Jud. Dist. Jul. 9, 2014) separately rules against that state's ban. That decision was stayed as well. |
| 2 | Kansas | | | | United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rulings in Kitchen v. Herbert and Bishop v. Oklahoma set precedents for entire circuit. Enforcement stayed in initial ruling pending petition for writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court. |
| 3 | New Mexico | December 19, 2014 | | | New Mexico Supreme Court ruling in Griego v. Oliver. Same-sex marriages were performed in select counties before the ruling, as New Mexico's pre-existing marriage laws neither prohibited nor allowed same-sex couples to wed; the ability for a same-sex couple to obtain a marriage license varied from county to county. |
| 4 | Oklahoma | October 6, 2014 | January 14, 2014 (upheld July 18, 2014) | January 14, 2014 (circuit court decision stayed July 18, 2014) | United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma ruling in Bishop v. Oklahoma. Enforcement stayed in initial ruling, referencing the Supreme Court's stay in Kitchen v. Herbert. The Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments on April 17. It upheld the District Court's ruling in a 2-1 decision on July 18, 2014, though immediately stayed the ruling pending appeal. |
| 5 | Utah | December 20, 2014 & October 6, 2014 | December 20, 2014 (upheld June 25, 2014) | January 6, 2014 (circuit court decision stayed June 25, 2014) | United States District Court for the District of Utah ruling in Kitchen v. Herbert. District Court's order stayed on January 6, 2014, by the United States Supreme Court pending appeal. About 1,360 same-sex marriages were performed in Utah in the 17 days before the stay was issued. The Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments on April 10, and upheld the District Court's ruling on June 25, stayed pending appeal. |
| 6 | Wyoming | October 21, 2014 | October 17, 2014 | October 17, 2014 | United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rulings in Kitchen v. Herbert and Bishop v. Oklahoma set precedents for entire circuit. Enforcement stayed in initial rulings pending petition for writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court. |
