THE UNION.

TIE cALuMNY or THE iSTELEIGEN
{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": "Iqey b FsW AIsHI NGT o n."}
{"character_count": 6634, "word_count": 1113, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9097999930381775], "ccnet_perplexity": [1941.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



WsoAnb waste no moro woods witis tho ihte-
sencet m reference ls charge sgaipst US Oh mis-


represspis.an. We gaysHsr spsth our statement


of ia es,sloss@ in cosnexion with Us yssiaismse Of


them, which was made expressly point out and d
correct our alleged misrepresenatioSs- And oul
readers hare already Esen that the Inslligenesr il
self, by itsb bo~p siassmsnt made with our alleged
misrepresentations before Il, fgny confirmed IN all
sbstantlal points the account we had given ef its
c?iniopsso hat matter, thsssfsse there Is end
We msssly ssmark ia dismissing that part OF the
subject that the ln,eIgeneer's purpose 10 raising
the cry rof misrepresentation was very Obvious
That cry only trick, as Intellectual as il
sorry and stupid, TO draw sus away from tho real
issues in the These were frss, the fnteIigen-
GERS ealqmny upon Jefferson inproelaiming him ID
be actualedSy the spirit and purposes of ths modern
''liberty msn,S in proposing tfs plan Of emanepa.
ion; and, steoadly, the motive or that journal in
perpeIaung this gross eaumny upon that great
mans memory. This moiiss we aege 70 be the
deAirs ofthe lntelliseneer to help on It's whig allies
at the north, who throwing themselves into the
ranks Of The abolitiouiyts, with viex TO secure .
whig assendeney through palpase violation Of the
constitutions, and on the ruins Of the institutions Of
the south. Again and asain-for this ia matter Of
grave signihcancs--ws cniis public attention.
to the fact that the National Intelligenecr con-
victed bysos OF ealumnialing Jefferson, and
charged with this motive for It's ealumpy, has NOT
bssa sb darag De syhl ten days vheh havs elapsed
siaee oar. charge made, 10 assign any other nso-
tire or prsftri Whaisesr for its most reckless and
fraudulent defamation OF the great democratic south
statesman. Its article Of yesterday is more than
three columns long and docs not attempt to reply to
repeated challenss, by assigning aoy other mo-
tive for its course. We therefore concuds, ndispu-
ably, that have OWNED its purpose, and that
II had no other =. aH. r"...


But to put this heinous fact beyond all dispute,
ard to show that the Intellgenoer has no scruples
about respg 70 all The articles Of fraud in order to
sustain the lbolitonizing wings Of the north, by a
perversion of Mr.. Jsfsrson's example, we must
cite the most material part of its comments, (n It's
las, artice,) upon Mr.. Jefersons opinions, as tsuy
quoted by US from his writings in refutation Of the
intslligencer's original calumnious garbling.


Inrepy 10 the InelIigencers declarations, as con-
tanned 10 It's first article, that ''Mr. Jefferson was
prspared to assert" just, by the way as the "lberty
msn" now assert) "tilat the laws were nothing
agaisst any of his new-fashioned political TRUTHS"
''tost thers could Cbe no properly in human BEINGS"
and tina, 'the federal power could, of its direct
authority eancpaie the blacks ,cihoui in amy man
nsr consulting The Siates-in refutaon Of these, the
Intclligencers monstrous assertions concerning Mr..
Jsfsrson's opinions, quoted the following passa
ges from Mr.. Jeferson's letter to Sparks: T..


I."Thsr eiimafss paIr sspropsrty, ia the first place
(or actual prcyerihas beea rested IN that firm
ard ,cho ia,cfuas lake from the possessors p at
average of two hundred dollars each, young and old,
would amour, tn siS hundred millions of dollars,
which must be paid or lost by Somebody 80


g. ain this way risaiion c pripuis right is pro
posed. P0ia4idry snrrepders would probably come In
as fast as the mems tobe provided for their care
would be compe,cnt 10 itp' G2hf-l y ''. 49,


This language which must have been seen by the
Inteligeneer when J. made It's quotations from the
letter to Sparks, Deliberately suppressed by the,
Journal because, cited, it would have deprived tbe
modern iberty nen of the benefit of the falsely al
lezsds.oineIsnce Mr.. Jefferson sentiments with
Th4t 'o~ni The lntelligencer does not deny the


oppression of this language. II cannot deny the
, .ertinency Of it 10 Mr. Jefersons opinions and
purposes in reference to slave property Why,
len, ors il suppressed Plainly, because it showed
Mr.. Jefferson TO differ from the views of the
Flibery men," and would not sabserve the Intelli-
gencer's purpose to pslliate and justify the abo-
ZIONIST sentiments and tendencies Of the wings, by
JetFerson's example. .t S,s f-.r gh .Vr


But, not contented with originally suppressing
Mr. Jeerson's language with this view, the InteIl-
gencer il ts article Of Thursday last, written after
had detected its fraudulent suppression, and laid
Mr. Jeferson's language before our readers, under
takes to garble the sens: oft, as follows


.The second of the Unions last extracts, if il
shows that Mr.. j. had, in 1924, modified his original
sehei far as propose longer TO violate anu pr-
rate right gel also shors that he still ished the master
TO get nokssgbor his sare. The only difference is
that he hadat first designed eompsipt, and that he
Afterwards adopted voluntary pan under neiiier Of
Uhich the master ito get any equivalent, unless
mayhaP, It would 1aye been one to tax him for the
expenses Of educating and transporting his slaves
and to the federal burdens to be gathered
of him, by diyertog to emancipation the funds
arising from the land salss."ba' eaia a4lai VI 2


"Jhodi6ed his original sshsmst'' Why, the Iptell-
gencer first cited the letter to Sparks expressly in
orderso show that the fplanaof emancipation pro.
posed by Mr.. Jefferson, in fiis "Notes on yirgnia,"
was 'his own" and that his views .'remained u,,-
r4apssF up To- ths, close Of hslfeL iYetnow, That
joumaInblunders into the selfcontadiction of refer
ring % tc same letter order to prove that he had
IN ..ssmadifsd biz original schems p 5o asa i9sotae
ia TVsAsd tbtmasitr 70 get nothing or his ,rape'
This is inferred by the Idtelligencer, because Mr..
JslfarspI declares, that syolua@y sWrendtrs ponld
oomeaian sastcnough But we will not pursue this
garsing comment On Mr.. Jeffersons words any
afggifthoya Agar We put. j 20 the sInteigencer,
!" alter ypp hays once suppressed Jcifersons Ian.
enase, with viewiof proving shat he was ready to
ac, as the modern 'liberty mem act-and after you
hay been detected II that suppression, why do you
alii eostiwNs TO peryert the meaning Of his words
Twhea they ere broushs before your There is but
one answet'u An men Of. common sense viii agree
IN it IYpn wish TO make out Mr.. Jefferson to be
"a one Of the modern iliberty men, ia order to
justify, before the country, your whg allies in their
svowed alliance with that fanatical sectn ~