u. 3, District Court.
Before Judge Belts.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1958, "word_count": 353, "ccnet_language_score": [0.954800009727478], "ccnet_perplexity": [1584.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MARcH 27.-Wm. Wavi W. The ship Pansma, ker
Tackle, fe.-ln this case Quinzy claims the surplus
funds in court after payment to libellant Of the
amount Of his boomry bond to which the owner, Cam
eron interposed objection and the question to
decide which OF the two rightly entitled to the said
the 18th December 1884, and II 10 proved by other
documents produced in the that his right under the
bill Of sale vas only that Of mortgage For Cameron
commanded that the court has jurisdiction
that branch Of the and that the remedy Of Quin-
zy In his character OF mortgages must bs pursued
the State Courts.


JvDoE BErrs-This court being rightulIy in posses.
sion of the funds a. respecting the ship arrested has
necessarily. a. incident to that possession, power
decide who entitled to receive the surplus funds.
h therefore, ordered that the said Quinzy be paid out
Of the funds In court. against said Cameron the
sum Of $Sl76, paid by him to NJ g. 0riswod, on the
purchase Of said ship and also the premiums Of insur
paid by him Sl47S0, &C, .ogsther with commits.
sons and that the 5000 paid BY said Quinxy 10 Geo.
Marshall, be disallowed.


Scsn and ofh,rs The Ship Acslem-Dscree In favor
Of libellsnts for Sbs.


Jenafhsn Win ps The Schooner .dctive.-Ths vesssl
built in this city In le46, for Of the claim
ant, who residents Of South America, and aliens
She put to the property Of the caimaut and from
disaster had to return sgain, and lbssd by
the bsllant for furnished by him for the
age Decree in favor Of belant for $6s, with interest
frem Nov %, 1875.


Oven DAILY vs TAe Ship GsmiI.-Libsl dismissed with
costs


The United States BerjsMin Hiu-This was an &C.


ton Of debt to 500 penalty under the 10th sub
division Of LIST section Of the act Of July 2 l further
regulating the shipment end discharge Of ssamsn. A
verdict taken in this case the opinion Of
the Court on case made. The case was argued this
term, andths Court gave judgment for defendant
