{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 694, "word_count": 131, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9028000235557556], "ccnet_perplexity": [1187.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
legged to be directly the reverse ofright, abso iute proprety requiring the announcement t assert the marriage of Miss B. to Mir. A. Int argumentfor this which we find in the N Y Oazette' appears to be conclusive:

 Iae man IS not married to the woman, bu 'he woman to the man. Nothing of the man, state IS nor should be merged in marriage, bu oi the woman there is and should be. The man changes neither position nor name, the woman does both; therefore it is proper tc say that the woman is married to the man and not the man to the woman.

 The same etiquette demands this which de. mands that Senator should be presented tc President, or Duke to King, instead of { President to Senator. &c.