MASSEY vs. WALKER.
{"newspaper_name": "State journal & flag.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 520, "word_count": 89, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9751999974250793], "ccnet_perplexity": [1148.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Ut' CHH CUHHIy' S. F. RICE, for plaintiff.

 B. PoPE, contra.

 GOLDTHWAITE,J J. l. The statement, that tone was largely embarrassed with debt. at a certain date," is not ibe statement of conclusion as distinguished from fact. 3. Where evidence is excluded in the first instance, on an exception taken by the party against whom it is offered, but is afterwards put to the jury, upon lhe other party withdrawng his objections the ex. cepton falls within the admission, and cannot be looked 10 on error. Judgment affi med.