Common Pleas.
I..A v---L.
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 3316, "word_count": 606, "ccnet_language_score": [0.964900016784668], "ccnet_perplexity": [1536.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MAxcH ls-Edmund Jones ps' Joseph Guliek.-This
and on Mrs Jones' and her Ps at
the time Of tbs alledged trespa owner Of the Second
Ward Hotel and the defendant is Mr. Gulick the mill.
tia ne collector II appeared that sometime previons to
February ls4S Mr. JoAss' son was fined BY Court Mar.
tiai 81 or So and warrant wa: granted ssanst him
srd of February s45, Guilick with his assistants.
went to the house Of Mr. Jones' at o'clock in the morn
Ing bsr sto the hs James omsra the bar keep
er who was setting in the BAR asked Oulck what ne
meant by moving the chairs and tables The latter re-
piled, that he gsng to take them away The BAR
keeper came from behind the bar and took hold Of the
door and again asked what right he had to take the fur
and that he taking them away to sell them 70 pay
the nne Gulick was then informed BY the bsrkesper
send up up Jons. would pay DS any claim there might be
against the propsy AZ the sametims one Of the men
who assisted in the seizure held the snoo Of u. door
asked him If he meant TO resist AT this time crowd
collected in front and inside the house. and Mr. Edward
pearsd and advanced the hall door, while the property
being tsksn and Edward said he was ready to pay
any claim that against him his mother also offered
to pay any claim against her son. and then went to the
front door and repeated the offer. 0ulck 10 alleged
then cnched her and showed her violently into the ths
door, The defendants counsel relied on the fact that
his client in the execution Of his duty, under legal
process and that he resisted He also produced one
witness, who that he assault com mit.ed
The jury fouad verdict for plaintiff against Gulick Tor


xU.-S0W0et
action for assault and battery Plaintiff and de-
fendant live In the house. In Resde street they
quarrelled and defendant who had just come frsm mar
ket struck the plaintiff in the mouth with lot Of hsh
which held in his hand The jury rendered verdict
Of $40 for plaintiff.


For plaintiff, Mr.. J. Z. Palmer.


For defendant, Mr.. d. NJ Cowdrey.


Gssld, Banks 4 Co. %. David Boxes at al-This was
an action repevin for the recovery Of law library
The plaintiffs sold lot Of books TO Mr. Ransom law
YER who had his oces in John street. Of which the do.
fendant the landlord Ransom executed mortgage
to Gould, Banks Co. the books, and subsequently
they seized BY Mr. Bokse for rent and replevned
by plaintiff The present action brought to try the
rights of the parties After both parties closed the ev
dence, the case was adjourned TO Tuesday morning.
For PLAINTIFF, Messrs. Sears Mllspau.
For defendant, E. c. Gray


Before Judge Ulshoefer.


JOHN M Csssdy Henry C. Rabinssu, impleaded, re.
This action promssory note for $l75 De-
fence, usury. Verdict for plaintiffs, Slss 90.


For plaintiff, Mr.. Nelson. For defendant, Mr. Tom
linson.


Henry ". Western and Hannoh, Ms Wife, W. John
PdekerThis was action of ejectmsnt, Tor the
very Of house and lot in Blocker street Defence
that defendant holds assignee lease made by Ben
jaman Romain deceased, who was formerly owner of
the promises in dispute To which 10 replied, that Mr.
Romain exceeded his powers in making said lease, hav
ing but life estate in the property In dispute. Verdict
for PLAINTIFF For PLAINTIFF. Messrs. Western and Ed
wards for defendant, Mr.. w. Morris.