{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1799, "word_count": 320, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9174000024795532], "ccnet_perplexity": [1776.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
PEACE PROPOSALS REJECTED--The news we give
in another column to-day ia OF the highest import
ancc. Mexico has refused to accept any proposals
for peace-a least so il is believed. VIII the Uni
ted States longer delayl VIII not our troops by
sea and by land now be ordered to a point where
they can find an enemy, at least attack the vital
part OF the Mexican nation. "Io Vera Cruz! to
Vera Cruz !" should be the watchword: then "to
the city of Mexco" Either the United States
must suffer disgrace, or she must now strike de-
cisive blow.


England sends out proposals 10 effect peace
ana 1t looks little as though she did not intend to
be refused. BY looking at all the antagonstical
points, and the attitude IN which England, France
the United States, and Mexico stand, one has no
election as to how he would have this war termi-
nate. The tact s, we, nation, must act prompt-
y and decslvey, or meet such opposition and EN-.
barrasSment as will cost millions upon millions 10
get clear of. The people Of England do not under
stand the policy Of this governmentthey attribute
to us desire to subjugnta all Mexico France NAV
adopt this belief, and then, rest assured there viii
be serious interference. In fact il is the opnion of
some here that is really tho desire of the
nent to conquer and amer all .Nerico If this be
the intention, the people will not sanction it, Our
proper course is to establish firm national boundn-
ry on the south Of our possessions- the nso-
ient Mexicans manners-get our dues and see that
Mexico in future act well toward us.


From the Baltimore Republican and Clipper


The NEeoTIArIoy.-We yesterday copied from
the Union the official contradiction Of the report that
Mexico had declined our offer TO negotiate unless
upon the conditions that We should preVionsIy with