{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2116, "word_count": 356, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9545000195503235], "ccnet_perplexity": [1143.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
they would look side by side Unless our ooserVa-
ton is grossly at fault, Labor loses one hundred
dollars by the failure of individual or unncorporated
Employers where it loses one by the failure OF cor
poretons And the reason is obvious the Corpo
ration has definite, tangible capital which, holden
for the payment of its workmen; the individual
EMPLOYER sometimes has capital and sometimes has
not He may be tempted TO conceal or transfer his
property in order to defraud his creditors; corpo
ration may be defrauded but rarely deirauds' 10 J"
bankruptcy. whether real or fictitious Is death,


Even the Evening Pos, does not relish the IDEA oil
giving 10 the Corporations already In existence virtual


onol;es of their several pursuits when Is tne Ten
-. oe ,b;s new move of the Barnburners But
this ia natura tendency ofa that sort OF Legislation
N- buchanan boasted in Pennsylvania that the cleo
,on Of Polk had saved our Home Manufacturers from
the ruin which tie ferceness 9 competition evinced
in the enormous increase of new mills, factories
foundries, forges, &c, would have ensured, had en-
unequvocal friend Of the present Tariff been chosen
President We have no doubt that the price OF many
descriptions of American wares and fabrics would
have been decidedly lower al this moment If II had
settled in s44 that the Tariff TO stand unaltered
And thus our City, with her two Gas Companies
making enormous profits by charging exorbi,ant
prices is to be deprived Of the advantage of rival
company by the resolve of our Legislators that the
Portable Gas Company shall not be chartered Win
out subjectng each stockholder to liability Tor the
full amount of all its debts. And this Legislature
claims to be especially Democratic and hostile to
partial legislation!


This question OF Individual or Limited Liability
has hitherto been discussed almost entirely from one
side, and that the wrong one. The champions OF In
dividual Liability confidently expect TO fasien their
dogma on the Constitution of our State in the coming
Convention. Ist not high time then that it were
discussed from the right side also?