{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1276, "word_count": 238, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9556000232696533], "ccnet_perplexity": [1601.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
cause of the repeal of the Corn Laws and so on the
other side with respect to our Tariff The redoo.oh
on either side is inevitable without regard to Ore
gon. We believe our owp country will have cause
bitterly TO rue har course in doing, and that the


first Congress chosen by the People after they snail
have witnessed the effects of our abandonment OF
Protection, will be favorable to its reestabshmenl
If is not So we Protectionists must submit ou' II
the Country is with us why should we nos nave '''o
benefit of its verdict? If,be Soil Of England "eto
as well distributed among her People even as ou.'
i ,rc believe il would be unwise in her utterly 70
t.o. do,,o her Corn. Laws; and that 1t Will De sui


;a d, orr part to buy light, costly fabrics from
shro,d and pay for them in the rude bulky products
~ Agriculture and the Forest, we cannot doubt
No nation ever did-none in the nature OF Things
ever cantrade thus without serious, II not irrepar
able injury to its own Labor. But our couAtry mas
been beguiled into committing her destnies 10 the
adversaries of her true policy, and we bow TO the
decision. All we ask is that the People have an OPP
por;unity afforded them TO correct their mistake
when they shall have become convinced OF 1t. Is
this asking 100 much