{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1314, "word_count": 227, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9535999894142151], "ccnet_perplexity": [2132.89990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



JurE a. TAemss s. CsrgiH W. Gee. Seufkmeyd This
action to recover balance Of $3.50. The facts
were follows The plaintiff owner Of the Frank
lin Besh and entered into agreement with the defend
for the sale Of his interest thercn On the 10th OF
Msy both parties called Mr. John Rowland attorney.
and directed him 10 draw up bill Of salc and that the
consideration to be $4,000. Mr. Howland in pursu-
Of his Instructions drew up the agreement and the
defendant paid $3.50 down. and agreed that Mr. Howland
should keep the bill Of sale in escrow until tho balance
wss paid The defendant afterwards got tho agreement
ance. Two defenccs set up, that plaintiff had
not performed hs part Of the agreement by procuring tho
assignmcnt Of lease ef the bath and the other seto
nsither Of which they proved and tho jury found
dict for plainuG f066. For plaintiff Mcssrs. Chase K
Howland. For defendant Mr.. KimbslL


Before Chief Justice Jones'.


Daniel w. Clark vs.. Witiiam M Fresey--Action for
sssanlt and battery plaintiff Ia attorney, and
seems was connected with somc suit in which the de-
iendant was party. They met at BARRIERS shop in
September last the subject Of the suit introduced
which led 10 alteration and abusive language passed
bstwesn them. and the defendant struck the plaintiff
Verdict for plaintiff SO