{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2807, "word_count": 483, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9710999727249146], "ccnet_perplexity": [1631.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The senator from Missouri, in note appended to his
printed speech states that since this was spoKen the let
OF the treaty has been published in which secretary
informs Mr. Nc that he had given notice TO Mr. Paken
ham, that the Senate had advised the acceptance o the Brit
ish proposition in this Unite and instructed him to
advise lord Aberdeen accordingly No protest has been
received from the British government against this unde
standing, so that the question is at an end"


am afraid e question has vitality, than the senator
imagnes, when he thus summariy dposes oft What ef
feet formal protest accompanying the ratification OF
treaty has upon the Construction Of the language employed
is not before The Of Mr. Buchanan indicated
in this letter and with the facts he believed them to ex
i correct and prudent and had the Senate passed the
resolution he anticipated and obviously desired and had
the British government received without any counter
declaration might fairly insist that the grant In the
treaty controlled by this understanding But unfortu
natey deprived Of this auxiliary The Senate moi
only passed such resolution but positively rejected one
only ten members voting in its favor and the from
Missouri voting against IL And this took place the day be
known to him when he wrote


This conversation with MIR. Pskenhsm which Mr.. Nc
Lane requested to communicate to Lord Aberdeen and
which took place before the treaty drawn up
have had for its object TO prepare the British government


for formal action part and the precaution


prudent But this action not nor does the sub
ett itself upon the records othe senate IN the sub
sequent stage of the proceedings We took the proS
jor and minor articles and free Hagafon and all and did
attempt directly or indirectly, to limit this obnox
ious privilege. What Lord Aberdeen may have said to MIR
MoLane In their conversation, told But Ger
tsnly protests to expound treaties, whether extending
restraining the natural import Of the language be
ting what understood to be the views Senate mot
the ENecutVe question OF advising that
should be formed and before II drawn up
ting also that its ratification their sentiments wauld
automatically imbodied in order doubt that they might
be transmitted with the treaty ITSELF exposition OF
the extent Of our obligations repeat the object Of the
secretary proper one but his expectations were
ieaed by the action, or rather by the inacon Of the
Senate.


have here substituted for my own remarks the words
ofMr buchanan TO Mr. McLane in letter Of July ~ 1916
which communicated TO the since this discus.
sion took place The reader will gain by this anachro ism
and will therefore pardon IL Mr. buchanan with his
usual felicity Of thought and dcton has illustrated this
guhi ~ far betfe AN / nrc Gould do