{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2118, "word_count": 365, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9107999801635742], "ccnet_perplexity": [1702.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
srpEaIoR CorRT-D e C / s i @ n Judgment in the
co,rt below in the following cases OF appeal, were
ARMED :, cu..,.-. -.
Seth Hart rs John Hanna, Julan L. ~. Cnauoe't To-
Johu Allen.


'Vs Ssmnel McBurney u.s. Caleb Bartlett (two cases.


Thomas Warner rs. John p. Brahsm.


John Dogge,t rs. Daniel L. Sickles.


Peter NJ Hergoine os. George H. Torrey.


philip Narnbourn rs. Christian s. Crist


The following judgments Of the Court below were
reversed:


John A. Walsh, by his next friend Us. James Langley
CT, al.


i'm the case of G.us rs Oakley being for quantity o
ssrs bought AZ auction but refused account oil not
,.verinr representation and resod account OF tho
nn,rhsser the Court held that the owner is bound TO
i've notice 10 purchaser before reselliDg. The ques-
ZION of misrepresentation is not now touched upon by
Inc Court In the Of Walsh Langley, the Court
decided that where the plaintiff requires the books of
defendant TO be produced and put in evidence the de.
fepdan well plaintiff is entitled 10 the full use and
benefit of them.


The following decisions were also given:


Charles Gould John Observation-Disclosures tor
defendant.


Charles Mcneil u.s. John C. Davidson-Judgmen for
defendant.


Samuel N Dodge rs John Murphy ct. al-Judgn1ent
fer defendant on demurrer.


CouRr OF COMMON PLEAS Frances Connor vs Nicholas
D. Penfold.-The plaintiff is said to be alady fond OF
literary pursuits although obtaining n living by her
needle She boarded at the house OF defendant No 33l
Pearl ST. but leaving his house. he refused TO permit
her take away her trunk and sack containing manu-


scripts letters. &c. asserting right 10 desin them Tor
SO due him for board but weeks afterwards he
ave them up She then brought the present action in
uespass for bis OBTAINING them alleging also, that the
MSS bad been injured the back part OF the lid OF the
uunk being broken. that it could be opened. She
fJled however, in showing any loss or injury. The
Court charged that the keeper OF boarding house oher
;hsn tavern) has right dctain baggage Verdict
sr plaintiff SIS. This throws the costs upon plaintiff