{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "pNone", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 513, "word_count": 95, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8122000098228455], "ccnet_perplexity": [1410.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
u. $. SUPREME CorRT, Jan. Is, ls46-No. 60.
West River Bridge Company, plaintiff In error. vs.
Joseph Dix a al The argument Of this was con-
cluded by Mr., Webster for the plaintiff in error No
"a The United States appellant John e. McLsmore
ct al This argued by the Attorney General
for the appellant and by Messrs Brnlsy and Eaton for
the appellees No. n. A. Michond OF al appellants w.
B. Girod ct al Ths argument Of this cause was com.
msnced by Mr. Eustis for the appellants Adjourned till
Tomorrow, u O'Clock