BOYD & WALK, vs. MARTIN & BOL

 LING.
{"newspaper_name": "State journal & flag.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": "Sumter Circuit Court."}
{"character_count": 827, "word_count": 146, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9514999985694885], "ccnet_perplexity": [663.7000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Sumter Circuit Court. R. H. SMITH for the plaintiff in error. BLISS x BALDWIN, and HAIR, contra. ORMOND. J.

 1. The general rule in regard to contracts is, that where the legal interest and the damages resulting from breach of the contract is joint, the contractees must all join in an action thereon, although the contract be in terms joint and several :; but if it appears from the deed that the interest is several, although the covenant is in terms joint, the action must be sev- eral.

 }. There is nothing in our statutes forbd- ding attachment bonds to be given jointly. All the defendants where there are more than one are equally liable to the plaintiff, and equally exposed to the burden of de. lending the suit, and for this purpose must be considered but as one person in legal estimation.

 Reversed and remanled.