To the editor Of ths Bosio. Posl I:
{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1144, "word_count": 193, "ccnet_language_score": [0.871399998664856], "ccnet_perplexity": [2138.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
sis; You will oblige me by placing the the follow
ing correspondence befoFe. yosrpeaders.


pflate years II has n0t been unsommon 10 find
the terms acting so4ak " Msnchss,er manulac-
tuier, !" "Briiish agents. ~ rreopien1 Of British
gold,n applied 10 dispo5oGomcnt Of those persons,
who, seeing the inurous effects Of the tariff OF 1912
upon The interests o. ths sadipg glasses of the
Try, have striyen TO aver. thsn by advocating the
modification Of the Objectionable features of that
law | have not escaped one Of the terms; and
though does not seem 20 have been INTENDED 10 my
disparagemeni, YET withou. ths expanaiion Of the
patty applying j., which follows. the public mind
might not otherwise so have interpreted 4, s


My motive In writing 10 England for and taking
samples 10 Washington. ~aslo convince The repre-
sentatyes Of the naiion how much tbe great majority
Of their constituents would be benefited by an inter
change on free and rational basis than here
tofors, OF their agricultural and other productions
for the cheap manufactures Of Great Britsa and
not with view TO subserye the interest Of Man
chester manufacturers. % t"N