{"newspaper_name": "The North-Carolina standard.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1021, "word_count": 192, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9384999871253967], "ccnet_perplexity": [1059.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Ma: EorbEN Permit me to cofrecttw6 mistakes
that were made in my PublcaIioh last week. FIRST,
the saving IN every outlay of S20l 10 the purchase
of iron trace-chains for ploughs wagons, &c, will
that will be made on every outlay Of 5 237 in the
purchase Of glass, viii be $l07. The burden that
will be taken OF the people Of North Carolina By
the act of 1885, will exceed million of dollars per.
perpsal 6 dhe asrfoos reports made 70 Congress oe
the subject by the Secretary of the Treasury. Is
il not, then, astonishing that any member of Con-
gress from this State should have The hartihood 10
vote against the bill There will be published in
a1few days table showing the amount Of tax
taken under the act of 1912, and that of 1916, on
each and every article of common and necessary
use, imported into the United States. now caIl
on the people to give the said table an attentive
see with amazemeht the great difference in The
amount of the taxes raised from Us, by the two
acts. re ..y.c. s-.si-. 10 ...s .s ROANOKE. s