{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1488, "word_count": 265, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9603999853134155], "ccnet_perplexity": [2011.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
FIRE SAFEs.-We regret that the keenness OF
competition among the makers and vendors of GER
tain articles is such as TO lead them TO seek the
atation of their wares by the not always jus; dis
paragemen, of their rivals Such we think, has
been the case with the manufacturers of rival but
both excellent Bank Locks such appears TO be
now the case with regard 10 Bank Safes. The
proprietor of Widers Salamander Safe complains
of the late trial OF Safes AT Vauxha Garden as
fair in these respects viz. l. That the trial was
oncsided entirely Tha, i, acceded to on his
part because he considers Gsyeys Safe clear infringe
meni the patent of the Sslsander and that
has been pronounced by Judge Belts Of the L. $
District Court B. Gaylers is substantially DouJle Sal!
Gr7orGer and nothing The pretended trial there
fore proved only that Slansn6er Safe placed inside
OF another one will stand fire better than II exposed TO


It's dcc, acton-which nobody would think of isputins
All these warrng claims TO Patent Rights and supe
riori.y Of construction leave the legal tribunals
andihc publicone thing know, however that ordi
nsry single Wider's Sslamsnder. OF moderate size in
which our books and money were kept on and prior o
the disastrous 5th Of February lsst held them ssfe
through ,hirtysix hours OF intense heat in the destc
ton of our office by FIRE year and returned them
TO US unnured How much better another may do, We
say not bu, that this did its duty noby we most heartily
testify.