Superior Court.
n>f.n~o Tr I~A nak kloxy
{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2207, "word_count": 376, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9473000168800354], "ccnet_perplexity": [1689.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
H.. Before Judge Oakloy.


TN MARCH !; oshiy '; Hs.snS a:rr1SaM,s a. -
defendants.


Stachan = Scott W. Small, W1llisme 4 Co.-Ths was
suit brought to recover two bills Of exchange for 81
each drawn by J. H. Williams Co, bearing date Nov.
g. 1884, at 90 days. upon Edgell Mulford Co, New Or
leans and endorsed by J. II. Williams Co.. Smell Viii
lams & Co. and Others purchased by the plaintiff and
returned under protest. for non.payment These two
bills are among others drawn BY J. H. Williams Co.,
and three other firms to assist John Steinberger with
all Of whom he identified in the purchase Of beef
pork and provisions generally amounting in all to $780,
900, which, from disastrous conquences in argcpecua
tons during the year is44, remain unpaid The defence
rests chiefly upon the order in which the notice was
served-that served personally &c that Small
Of the defendants authorized to the
OF the firm in this transactionthat was out Of their
usual course Of business sc. Verdict tomorrow.


Before Judge Vanderpoel.


Daniel NJ Pratt vs. Margaret Nc GoUen aad Isaae .adri-
dnce-This case reported yesterday, after having
beenprogreed with at considerable length resulted in
a non suit.


George Fulton u.s. Beaj r. Winth,op.- This was suit
brought to the last quarters rent Of premises No
565 broadway for the years at tho rate
year The defence set that the landlord thinking
the premises needed repair previous to the introduction
menced certain and that he was not only
seriously incommoded, but the lives Of his family were
endangered by attempt to raise the tenement from Its
former foundation by means Of Screws and such like ap
pances whereupon vacated the premises and there
FORE refused to pay the last quarters rent Verdict for
the defendant.


Charles Mii5ank at ais u.s. Cyrus Losee als-This
action brought to the amount OF promissory
note for S459 bearing date 2sth Of April ls45, two
months The defence contend that this note was given
by Losee independent Of the knowledge consent of
his partners and they also claim Offset Of about $780,
in consequence Of quantity Of -four purchased there
which, was understood between the parties to apply
on the same To be resumed tomorrow morning.