From the New Haren Register
{"newspaper_name": "State journal & flag.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1572, "word_count": 260, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9404000043869019], "ccnet_perplexity": [801.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
DIRECT TAXATION. copied capital article from the Journal of Commerce a day or two since, which gave the manulac. turers some very good advlce; and among other things told them that blind opposi. lion 10 liberal tariff policy like the prese mt, might result in the abolition ofall duties, and the raising of revenue by direct taxation. Because the present law ought 10 be consid. cred compromise of all interests and opin- ions--the ultra high tariff man relinquishing his ideas oi entire success, and the ultra fret trade man his notions of entire abolition of duties. Tine article in question tells what may happen--rather lhan what it would wish to have occur. The result of war extremes--in which harmony of interests would 5e sacrificed in scramble for the

 mpracticable. The doctrine of ultra free

 trade Is not so objectionable, in the minds of people generally. as ultra protection. In the whig ranks there are many who bodily declare their preference for supporting the government by direct taxation-as the slnle government is suppored-yet who, with the same persons in the democratic ranks, are willing to concede something to the opn

 ions of the protectionisls, and therefore ad. voca'e revenue tariff with incidental pro. tection. They are willing to sustain com. promise, or liberal policy. But if the middle course is abandoned by the "hgh protec lioniss," and they insist or the ..whole or none"--if they are determined to "take the whole" in opposition to all compromise, the prospect of getting "none" is quite as strong as that of getting the "whole."