{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2719, "word_count": 482, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9649999737739563], "ccnet_perplexity": [1216.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
THOMAS BEwLEr and ANN, his wife, In Queen


.4nn's county


court, sitting


as court of


JAMES l.. BEwLEr. term, 1886
T,HE object of this suit is to procure decree for
l. sale of certain premises in Queen Ann
county, conveyed by certain James Roe to James
l.. Bewley nonresident, in fee, that your orators
may receive the difference between the sum paid
therefor by said james l.. Bewey, and the amount
of such sale, in the that said James l., Bew-
ley shall not pay unto your orators the of IF
teen hundred dollars, with interest from the date Of
the aforesaid conveyance.


The bill states that, some years ago, your orators
conveyed tertaln premises to certain James Roe,
in fee, for the of two thousand dollars but that
said conveyance was intended TO operate a mort
gage, for that said Roe passed his bond to Thomas
Bewley, binding himself to reconvey the pay
ment to said Roe of said two thousand dollars; and
further that said Roe gave bond to Ann, wife Of
Thomas Bewley, providing for her an annuity Of
seventy-two dollars during her natural life, in case
said Ann should survive said Thomas Bewley.
The bill further states that said Roe offered to your
orators the sum Of fifteen hundred dollars for the
delivery Of the aforesaid bonds but that your ora
tors, believing the said premises to be worth more
money, and being unwilling the title should pass
out of the family Of your orators, prevailed upon
James l.. BewIey, the defendant, to discharge the
debt due and owing to said Roe, who thereupon
conveyed said premises to said defendant fee but
your orators that it was understood and agreed
between them and said defendant, that the defend
ant should have only the estate and interest therein
which said Roe had held; and that, trusting to the
fial affections of said defendant, did not require
such obligations from him as said Roe passed, and
now said defendant hath elected them from said
premises TO the great injury of your orators, and
they without remedy, except by the interference
of this court; and that the said james l.. Bewley
resides out of the State of Maryland.


II ia thereupOn a1iudued and ordered af he
complainant by causing copy of this order to be
inserted in some newspaper published in the city Of
Washington, District of Columbia, once in each of
three successive weeks before the first day of July
next give notice the said absent defendant of the
object and substance of this bill, and him to
appear in this court in person, or by solicitor,
before the second day of November next, to answer
the premises and show cause if any he has, why a
decree ought not to pass prayed


P. B. HOPPER.


True copy. Test: JOHN TILGHMAN,


Clerk Of Queen AIMS county court.
-- Nav 26-Iaw.}w