{"newspaper_name": "The North-Carolina standard.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1156, "word_count": 222, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9386000037193298], "ccnet_perplexity": [1285.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
marriage Announcement An argument is 60
ing on among Northern editors as to the proper
form OF announcing marriages. The most usual
style is TO proclaim the marriage of Mr. A. and
MISS g. This is wrong, for although both the
parties may have been married, it is left uncertain
Whether MI A. is married or Miss B. The use
OF The word with, is objected to as awkward.
Another usual form OF announcement is to state
the marriage of Mr. A. to Miss B. This, how
ever is alleged to be directly the reverse of right


aosoIu!e proprlety requiring the announcement to
assert the marriage of Miss B. 10 Mr.. A. The
argument for this which we find in the N. Y. Ga.
zelte, appears to be conclusive: -


Inc man IS not married to the woman, but the
woman to the man. Nothing of the mans state
is nor should be merged in marriage, but of the
woman there is and should be. The man changes
neltner tn position nor name, the woman does both


therefore 1t IS proper to say that the woman is
married to the man, and not the man to the woman


me same etiquette demands this which de.
eu"GS Pra"d unat Senator should be presented to
dent to Senator, &C. '''O'O'N u q l feSi-