{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1061, "word_count": 191, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9675999879837036], "ccnet_perplexity": [917.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
"As EaRoA.--Ths New Dreams Delta says Il 10
an error 10 suppose the whole of the forts at Mon
'srcy were captured by army thar there remain
ed strong Fashioned fort at the north west side ~
the city IN Possession of the Mexieans containing
QUO soldiers, with full supply of ammunition"


We presume this paragraph is itself an error,
five are to understand IL is not now in the pos
session of our troops, although it was not
taken at the tine Of the eapitulation. The
Questioned fort" referred To is probably the
eiadi, designated in its proper place in The diagram
Of the town which We have published But this
fort TO have been given up, by the fourth article
Of the terms of capilulation Of the 25th September,
expressed rs follows;


"AkT. Nv. That the citadel Of Monterey be evae-
uated by the Mexican, and occupied by the Amer
can forces, tomorrow morning, at 10 o'clock"


And again, the Matamoros "Fiag," Of the 29th OF
September, says that "the citadel was evacuated on
the 25h, at lOa. m and was Immediately occupied
by portion Of Gen. Worths DIVISION"