{"newspaper_name": "True Democrat.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1448, "word_count": 247, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8762000203132629], "ccnet_perplexity": [2272.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
There is something excessively disgusting
in the following scene, reminding the reader
ofthe lowest FISH market lingo" We regret
that this abusive aud vulgar language should
have been inierchangcd between Democrat and
Democrat, for Clark and Younga are both mem
bers Of the democratic party. The former.
however, belongs to the good old school and
the latter leads on the herrsy Of the new-lighls,
whose fundamental doctrine is, mon btiorc
principles" But what great question has so
excited the feelings ofSenators that the proprie-
ties Of language are forgotten, and a whole Sc
nate Chamber shouts 'hurrar as though cock
igh, was going on, instead Of the consideration
Of the grave affairs Of Stalel Why, "the
spoilsr-lhe public prinling-for which two
vorscious and unamiabie editors are coni'nd.
inel What a satire uron our paryl Is il
possible that our victories must BE- followed by
dis,cnsions THAT we can hsve no union, but
on the eve Of q political srugglel


soExr ~ TIE NEw YoRE LreIsLA.
rUKE-Au Albany paper gives the allowing
elegant conversaiion as having occurred IN the
Senate Of New York.


Mr. Clark You are doiger on the Con
veution bill


Mr. Young You lie, sir


Mr. C.-iYou owned sock IN thirteen
bankai


Mr. y You De, tir'


MIC You have bad Princely fortune
ron the eoUniry'


NJ Y.-fwHh be fooi On The 5fskl You
hs you lisl you liei ron oid hyrocIlicF


Allthe sonsiors - Hooray hh bin again,
Butk. he hsint 60, 10 frienisP