FAULk & FAU1LK, vs. THE STATE

 Barbour Circuit Court.
{"newspaper_name": "State journal & flag.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 339, "word_count": 54, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9185000061988831], "ccnet_perplexity": [980.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
J. BUFoRD, for plaintiff in error.

 ATTORNEY GENERAL, contra.

 COLLIER, c. LA judgment n;si, where the ,charge is particularsed, should substantially describe the offence, or refer to it, that lhe recognizance may be identi- fled, and lbe defendants in the judgment be informed what they are called on to an swer.

 Reversed and renanded