{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1249, "word_count": 221, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9495999813079834], "ccnet_perplexity": [1231.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
sj- It appears that our noiice some week. since of the South Western Medical Reform CT, has been misunderstood by some who art the friends and patrons of the journal. W, have been requested to publish the follow. ing note, to explain the views and course O the conductors. And whilst we compl, with the request, we wish 1t to be under stood distinctly, that, we shall admit nc controversy 10 ensue from its publication .g8

 ' For hc BaRaer.

 \ FRIEND RUrHERfoRD-As have q bet ter opportunity than yourself of knowing the present position of Dr. Powell, you vii please insert the following in order 10 set tEit matter right in the eyes of the community as your editorial nciice of the "South-wes tern Medical ReformeF," seems to place hin only on midway ground between the Ok and New Schools of Medicine, which IS re ally not the fact,

 Dr. Powell, in crossing the Mississippi threw oyerboard the rubbish of the Ols Schools, and took on board new stores iron the Botanics, winch entitle hln loa most COG dial reception into the botanic ranks. Whatep CT of his old stores that he may ye, retain, nees

 not be feared by our botanic irieuds, as he oli

 ly y"holds fast that which 'good''--in sfrif accordance with the boianics long slanl|iu. motto: