For the Columbian Fountain
{"newspaper_name": "The Columbian fountain.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 937, "word_count": 163, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9765999913215637], "ccnet_perplexity": [1174.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
For the Columbian FOUNTAIN.


MEssRs. EDITORS: You would infer,
from my communication sent to you, and
published sorae weeks since, that the writer
was too much excited. am willing to adj
init that was sparring little, because had
been stung by some Of your wild Temper
ance hornets. But now, gentlemen, have
taken time TO calm down, and you shall
find me less passionate.


Lewis and Samuel, and others of your
correspondents, profess to be very cool and
calculating, and really write as if they were
sure, absolutely Sure, that truth is all on
their side Of the question. Now, gentle
men, you know that the single fact that a
question is debateoble is proof positive that
The evidence is not sufficiently strong TO
produce universal conviction in favor of the
truth, on either side Of such question. So
soon as the evidence becomes strong enough,
on either side, to produce universal convic-
ton that the truth is on one side and error