{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1616, "word_count": 290, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8684999942779541], "ccnet_perplexity": [1866.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Bei0ro Juog0 UMnOoneT.


JuNr 3--Baker rs. TayIor.-This was an sction for
trovsr brought for the value Of certain book.
by John g. Taylor and sent from the printers TO the csa-
blishment Of the defendant, who Is bookbinder In
October ls45 Johp Taylor sold to the plaintiff the
property in dispute. was shortly after demanded o
the defendant. who refused to give up nnng t9ss M
binding John 8 Taylor. Tire plaintiffs counsel in
sisted that that defendant had no lien upon the gene
raj property, but only II at ALL on the particular p5oge
upon which the work done and also contended that
the defendant did the binding for John Taylor under
sgreemeut 70 give elk monhs credit. and Inereiore
should look to the personal liability Of John B. Taylor
and not to the properly, security Adjourned 70 tn
morning For plaintiff Mr. Cowles for defendant, Mr.
J. T. Brady. nj s.a 4t & a easaeaa. s stsI


Before Judge Daily.
Jury 3--.yahn g. Cifes %. Emmsf Rask--This was an
action q trcver 70 recover SUM Of $3.50 ts value o.
quantity Of brandy and gin. The property Was sens on
storage to in Dye street. occupied BY fhs hrm o.
Dcvoe < Cunningham, Of which the detsndenf Wa
ground landlord The latter claimed rent to be due
and issued landlords warrant and seized and sold Il
AT the sale only fetched $op and the plaintiff insi.ta
that value Of Il upwards Of $780, and brings the
action for the difference. For the defence want oil no
tcs that the property belonged u plaintiff vas set up
and also the insolvency Of Dcvos Cunninghau Sealed
verdict tomorrow (thisl morning For pla'nuh' MT
Tomlinson for defendant, Mr. N. ID. Biunt