{"newspaper_name": "Mobile register and journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1952, "word_count": 344, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9749000072479248], "ccnet_perplexity": [743.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MT. WEBSTER delivered, at Philadelphia, on the 2d inst his long concocted attac upon the admin israton and the war, the new tariff the sub treas- ury, ,and indeed all the men and measures of the democratic party. The speech IS extremsly long and prepared with great labor and ingenuity. Less could not be expected from man of his conceded powers as an advocate, pleading for clients who pay him so large fee as the Boston wings have made for Mir. Webster to induce him 10 devote himself to their service; and who hold him under their influ- encs by committing his fee into an annual pension. The great pensionary ofwhggery worked faithfully for hls patrons but is his misfortune 10 make it evident, of late years al least, that he is working against his earlier and dsinierested convictions; and fails to impress any body with the opinion that he is more sincere than any lawyer whose choice ofa side is determined by the konorarium offered. The whole speech is tho plea of cunning and un- scrupulous lawyer-not the argument of a states man or man of independent mind and position. Nearly every position thereln whchs is material to the issues between the two parties, can be triumphan,y refuted by men of much smaller capacity than MT Webster, armed with the power of truth, against which he is struggling, as he once sad of another like strong man in morass;" and many of the strongest refutations be drawn from records and fortified by arguments for which Mr. Webster him. self can be quoted.

 The Pennsyvanian made an immediate practical and pungent answer to that part of MT. Webster g speech which maintairs the doctrine of protection. On the same morning that the whig papers issued the protection speech of the day before, the Penn ne ., .L. Faneuil Hall, few years ago, by the same MT. Webster, in which he opposed the whole doctrine of protection with vieor and force, and sincerity, which he has never beei able to surpass on the other side