{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1537, "word_count": 265, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9682000279426575], "ccnet_perplexity": [961.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Baltimore American" is fast losing that lib
eral spirit which once distinguished 1t. Its Wash.


ington correspondent is careless, sometimes reck-
less, in his statements. Who can repose any faith
in his assertions after his declaration that "Mr
Polt has lost nearly all popularity, except such as
attaches to the immense amount Of patronage which
is at this time incident to the Executive Office;
and that Mr.. Tyler was hardly less unpopular than
Mr. Polk now is, when he exercised the veto
power with such an unsparing hand and in defiance
of the will of Congress- We can scarcely con-
descend to notice what he says about "the organ.
scription is advancing with too much rapidity to
permit US to care for his fables. We would as
soon stoop to contradict the idle and absurd fan
faronade Of those congenial spirits, the "New York
Herald" and the "New York Express" But what
shall ofhs careless and unauthorized statement
about the Secretary of the Treasury having advised
"the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the
Senate" TO "put more of the public money in
bank2" We contradicted this statement on the most
positive authority on the 25th nst and yet the Bal
ton correspondent on the 9th. And TO this moment
do not recollect to have the assertion taken
back in the Baltimore American. or the same de-
ceptve character are all the statements of its
correspondent under date of August 25th concern
ing the treasury drafts. These whig scribbIers have
fabricated as many fables about these drafts as
would almost "freight navy"