LEDBETTER vs. THE STATE, ca rel

 Barbour County.
{"newspaper_name": "State journal & flag.", "edition": "01", "page": "p1", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 889, "word_count": 158, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9502000212669373], "ccnet_perplexity": [709.7000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
BUFoRD and J. G. SHORTER, for the ap. pelIanf.

 J. E. BELsER, for the relators.

 GOLDTHWAITE, J. l. The County Court is invested with pow CT to remove its clerk for misbehaviour, 'afler trial for and conviction of any of the acts of omission or commission spec. fled in the act, and under ii may tfy and convict its own clerk. ?. A conviction for misbehaviour, is free from error, when it appears sufficient charges in writing were exhibited, and found by jury, afier notice to the clerk, by serving copy of the charges, and al- lowing Tim to make defence. 3. In proceedings under the act the pariicu lar charge of misbehavior must be stated and proved. lntoxication of the clerk when discharging the functions of his of flee, is gross neglect of duty hut evi- dence of intoxcation at other times, or of the habit, cannot be admitted in proof of specific charge.

 Reversed and remanded.