{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 3063, "word_count": 542, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9639000296592712], "ccnet_perplexity": [1667.5], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
| Inc following articles appear in the "New Yorv
Journal of Commerce" and the!"Ne York Sun
| of yesterday:
| From theiJournal OF Commerce
"THE OREGON CONTROVERSY sErrLEp-Lette
| by the Great Western, from high sources, say th3
the Oregon question is SETTLED and give the detail
VIZ; lat. 49, to the straits of Fuca, and theL


through said straits to the Pacific leaving the who
| OF Vancouver's island to Great Britain the navia
| ton of the Columbia for a term of years, &c.
understand the fact to be- that the arrangement md
| through the medium Of several gentlemen at Wad
lngton, and which we announced perhaps n
| months ago, but which was retarded by the
courteous manner in which The offer of arbrat
was rejected, has now been recognised and cd
hrmed. The forms Of diplomacy will be go%
| through with at Washington, as we presume;


the formal negotiation has never by our governnsf
been committed to Mr. McLane; though the gene
Gus confidence existing between him and Lord ABS
| ueen has doubtless enabled him to render imports
aid in bringing the controversy to favorable issa
"A paragraph from Liverpool paper Of the III
| mentions the above intelligence as having been
| mored on Change, but does not speak confident.
OF It's correctness. Our regular correspondent writ
us under date of the 10th instant that the war.par
IN England, as well as here was completely dow
but ne does not appear to have been aware that
terms OF an arrangement had been agreed on"





"lmPoRTANT.-The only important news wht
we lind in the papers by the Great Western, i
| solitary paragraph in the Liverpool Mercury Of
lOth IN aliusion to our debates in Conpress and
| conclusion 1t says-'There ia little doubt that (
offer from our government which went out by /
Caledonia last Saturday-for it did go out notwiI
standing the ignorance of our slow-coach cotempM
raries on the subj bect-ciH be accepted and fnalp !
he this important and long pending question, SO K
are to receive from English papers that pacific int


gence which we have right to expect from Il
government journals, so richly supported by \
people and so frghtfully m mysterious and diplomaS
on matters Of such vital importance.


The New York editor may spare his rebuk4
upon "our government journals" for we can Id
nothing OF this settlement in England, or Of thf
dispatches by the Caledonia. In fact, we have
reason to believe either of them. 1t is further
impression, that Great Britain will make no on
until SHE hears Of the disposition Of the question \
notice by Congress. The procrastnaton whi
has marked our counsels has probably had its ef1
upon the British policy. IL Congress had passd| ,
the naked notice in December last, we might by thl
time have witnessed much more decided and chsst
ing state Of our relations with England. There
no knowing how far she expected the resolution N
notice to be defeated, or how much she calculsti
on our divisions. As at present advised, we hef
of nothing to justify the above statements ID
Liverpool Mercury" or in the eNsw York Joui
nal Of Commerce" 'sf