{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1319, "word_count": 229, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9602000117301941], "ccnet_perplexity": [1201.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We must again remind the lntelligencer Of the
sad predicament in which it is now placed II has
been eOnUieisd garbling its extracts from Jefferson,
TO prove that great patriot and statesman to have
entertained the views and purposes Of the modern
"liberty men," Ii ia charged with having done this
deed in order 20 countenance the aboltonst proceed
ings of the wings of New England. IL has as yet
shown no other mOius for its misrepresentation, and
it has made no defence Of them. Worse than this.
II has quoted temperate and decorous article OF
ours, bringing home to it these ch argos, and with
out attempting other denial or refatation, 1t has
,kulked out of the Argument, behind this uneIsa'Iy
paragraph


"If man is compelled to prove to people that
particular substance is most foul and offensive, he
does not waste breath TO prove il; he adopts very
different method which we will not describe. And
this must be our answer TO all such government ar
ueles as the preceding"


Defeat in controversy Of serious character, is,
we know, to any public Journal, calamity. But
few defeats in the ordinary course OF journalism,
bring with them shame like this. For the honor Of
The American press, we trust that the intelligeneer
will soon invent or imagine something else and
something better to be said in the premises.