Not Exactly!
The New.York correspondent of The Unioa thus
{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "pNone", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1294, "word_count": 221, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9348000288009644], "ccnet_perplexity": [1744.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The New-York correspondent of The Union thus
disco urses:


cannot but think the present is nc time to settle the
Oregon Tariff and Corn questions on solid and per.
mancnt basis; ; and that they may be grouped and
combired as to be mutually advantageous TO both ma
tons and insure uninterrupted peace. These gold
en- opportunities accomplish mighty results, and the
people certainly do expect much from enlightened
democratic administration and legislation


Yours, truly, EsBE."


We protest against any such grouping" and
combining Let US settle the Oregon Question
fairly and u whether by negotiation orarbitration
This is bargain that two parties must unite in
Not SO with Corn and The Tariff. Such should be
arranged by each party for itself and SC left 10 be
modified at its own good pleas are. If Great Britain
chooses to repeal her Corn-Laws, very well. five
choose TO modify Tariff, nobody else has any
right TO object. But il we undertake an Inter
national dicker on the subject of Corn and Tariffs,
complicating matters still farther by stirring in
Boundary adjustment we shall make two misunder-
standings for every one we heal Let us make and
mend our own Tariffs, and leave Great Britain TO do
the same. Nothing but evil can come by mixing up
Corn and Cloths with Boundary Treaty.