Volume 6.

paper. The Sikhs fought with won.
{"newspaper_name": "The Southern journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1413, "word_count": 245, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9617000222206116], "ccnet_perplexity": [733.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
paper. The Sikhs fought with won.
derful courage, and the English report
their loss at from $4,000 to $4,000
men, either killed or wounded. The
remnant Of their party dispersed, prir-
cipaIly among the British possessions,
instead of returning to their own ter
ritories. The camp and all their ar
tillery, consisting Of more than $50
pieces. fell prey TO the conquerors.
Sir Hugh Cough commanded in the
battle on the part Of the English; the
Governor General, Sir Henry Har-
dinge, was on the field in person,
bearing the second command. Eng
lish critics censure both those officers
for want Of skill and management in
the field, and attribute the victory to
the unhinching irmness of the British
soldiery when it came to the use Of
the bayonet. The action commenced
on the 18th December, languished
the next two days, and commenced
on the 2lst, and was concluded on the
22d. The field Of the principal &C.
ton was Frozcs shar-but our readers
will excuse US from going into topo-
graphical details of the battle. The
accounts, TOO, must be taken with
great allowance, coming entirely from
the English. We have only room for
the annexed list Of killed and woun.
ded on the part of the English, but
they themselves confess that the re-
tuins from many regiments were quite
incomplete. We should have partic-
ularized amongst those killed in the
action, the brave Maj. Gen. Sir Jas.
McCaskill. But to the returns:


