{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1350, "word_count": 238, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9750000238418579], "ccnet_perplexity": [959.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
they gave complete satisfaction to the whole community.

 The arucic from the lntelligencer is anl- biguoas in Iss terms, and duplicates Messrs Howell. Snspp & C. without naming it in plain language, as being the contractors on the Route from Little Rock to Van Buren and Fort Smith. This is incorrect. The contractors on that route, are Messrs Emzy Wilson k Co, and their supposed neglect or failure, for we know nothing about any, to perform their duly, should not be made to operate to the prejudice of those who are not. in lie remolest degree, interested in the line

 Tue mails have been carried by Eolrei, SadPp SfCo, on the ROekroe and Napoleon route, win as much expedition and regulari- Y, as by any other contractors who have ever had that contract The ldte coniraetoys on the line. were also, as far as we have any knowledge, prompt and efficient. During the time that Ho,csi, Saapp S Co, have had the contract, there has been one failure. and perhaps one partial failure in the mail to this point, of which we have any knowledge And that we understand resulted from a combination of circumstances not within the control ol the contractors. We give thus statement of facts, that injustice may not be done the contractors. And as an act of justice 10 Hoarel, SnaPp $ Co. we think the ln,elli- gencer should correct the article it published