{"newspaper_name": "The New York herald.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2016, "word_count": 350, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9779000282287598], "ccnet_perplexity": [1750.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Before Judge Edmonds.


JAM l5-John Glenn Susan a D6y-This was
action on promissory note dated 2lst December lS43,
for $s75 made by defendant payable to the order Of
endorse to William Bend and the latter passed
to the plaintiff appeared from the testimony in the
cause that in December ls43 Greiggs applicant
for the benefit Of the bankrupt law. Bend credi
tor Of his and filed objections to his discharge pro-
position was then made the part of Greiggs through
broker named Schell to Bend to withdraw his opposi.
tion and that notes to the amount $780, to be drawn
the latter would be given to him. Bend accepted tho
proposition and withdrew his objections and Mrs. Day
accordingly gave her notes. Of which the note in
questlon Bend subsequently, gave the note to q man
named Donald Mclllvain who resides in Baltimore and
McILvan procured Glenn, the plaintiff who is broker
residing In Baltimore also to discount it, after which he
sent the proceeds to- Bend to this city The defence set
having given valuable consideration for the note
condly, that it accommodation note defendant
having received no confederation for thirdly that
was void under the bankrupt act. Francis Sayers
the defendants attorney proved the negotiation and the
craving up OF certain papers between Greiggs and
bend that Bend withdrew his opposition Greggs dis
charge, and that notes for $li0O were given 10 him
the broker, gave testimony to the effect. letter
from Greiggs to Bend was then produced, in which
Greggs declared he would avail himself of any legal
defence under the bankrupt The testimony Of Mr.
taken de ben then read which proved
that iu was given by the plaintiff for the
note The case was then rested and MT Kimbal coun-
sci for the defendant moved for nonsut the ground
that the note was void under the bankrupt law The
court denied the nonsuit and directed the jury to nd
verdict for the plaintiff subject to the opinion of the
court, on case to be made For plaintiff Mr.. Thomas
for defendants, Messrs. Saysr and Kembai.