MEXICO.
{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2677, "word_count": 476, "ccnet_language_score": [0.947700023651123], "ccnet_perplexity": [1204.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
This mornings Baltimore American" refers 10
our Mondays article on Mexican AFFAIRS and says
the "Unionn undertakes vindcation OF the course
pursued by the administration from the beginning
ofTexan annexation down to the marching OF Gen.
Taylor TO the banks of the Rio Grande' IL main
taias that policy Of forbearancs has been adhered
TO even under great proyocauons"


After giving an extract from the "Union," the
American Says


"At this point the Official paper turns OIL to some
other topic, giving no lntmSuon OF the next step
likely TO be recommended to Congress IN the pres
ent state Of our relations with Mexico.


alt is not our purpose 10 press Tor information on
this subject still less TO seek tfor matter OF censure
upon tine administration. eagree win The Union
that the course of this government towards Mexico,
since the annexation OF Texas, has been one OF for
Dearanee. Yet il is known TO the whole country
thS. very peculiar and most critical issue Is pend
ins this time between the two countries eoncern-
ing the result of which much anxiety Is felt. The
army Of the United States Is posted IN the lmme-
diate neighborhood Of the Mexican forces No en-
counter has yet taken place, except one OF drums
and trumpets on the opposite banks OF he Coloradoi
the two armies are looking at each other across the
Rio G rande


Things can scarcely be expected to continue long
in thi position. IL is supposed, in some quarters,
that he administration is awaiting new revolution
in Mexico, and the return Of Santa Ana to power,
who is believed TO be favorable 10 negotiations with
the United States. A new revolution was awaited
by our ambassador al Jalapa but waiting served no
purpose. lnasmueh, however, as the government
may be presumed TO have information on this sub
ect not possessed by the public, We may leave II TO
act in It's own time; il may then be judged whether
the action or the posponement Of suited the nature
Of the crisis"


The american" is not so impatient in waiting
for the Presidents course in regard 10 Mexico as IL
was in asking for the terms upon which he would
negotiate with Great Britain. We commend its
present orbearance and discretion. In both cases,
perhaps the government may have information not in
the possession OF the public and IN both may
be right to "leave it TO act in is own time" though
in both it is responsible to the country for the proper
conducting OF the public affairs We presume the
administration has the Mexican case under its best
consideration and will act in its good time, with
out waiting upon Santa Ana, or for a new rev olu
tion playing at all the part Of what Walter Scot
calls "a waiter upon Providence"