CIRCUIT COURT.

SITTING In CHANCERY.

#.4# atf PREsE ENT


JUDGES MORSELL AND DUNLOP.
{"newspaper_name": "The Columbian fountain.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1307, "word_count": 231, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9805999994277954], "ccnet_perplexity": [880.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
y t. 4 j


Nothing OF any importance was done to day
besides filing petitions, making orders, SC. il
we except the case Of Samuel Stou vs.. w. T.
Dove.


The case was argued by Messrs. Bradley
for Slott, and Carlisle and r. Wallace for de
fence.


The facts are in substance as follows:


Slot charges that he and dove entered into
co-partnership to carry on the lime burning
business; that Dove had rendered the firm LA
bic to large amount; that he had applied TO
Dove for settlement and division Of the pro-
fits, which he refused. Upon this bill an in
junction had been issued restraining Dove from
buying, selling, or carrying on said business
till he had settled.


Dove replies that no partnership had existed;
that Stott had refused to become partner. but
had made advances of some money to enable
him to carry on the business; which money
had been secured by conveyance to Stott OF
real property. He further claims that Stott ne
yer pretended to be partner until ne found
the business to be profitable one.


The case came up on motion, by the de-
fendant, to dissolve the injunction. The court
expressed the opinion that the injunction
should be dissolved, therefore Mr.. Bradley pre-
scented an amended bill, and asked the court 10
continue the injunction upon the facts stated
in the new bill.


