Majority for Cottrell, 45 v
{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 806, "word_count": 144, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9375], "ccnet_perplexity": [1251.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Baltimore Americann must excuse us for
declining to notice its remarks upon our article o
Monday night. We expressly disclaitned, at the
time, any intention to medde with the currency
question. We declared, in so many words, that as
to the proprety of making the issue, tanti-bank,
't belongs to the democracy of Ohio to decide; that
being matter Of State policy, it is not our province
to comment but to state facts and that "no State s
more orthodox upon the great questions Of NATION
AL policy" than Ohio is. As to the Oregon question,
that is all past, for good for evifor veal or for
wo. We have discussed the course which the ad-
nent, but the terms Of that arrangement are now
beyond our control. We decline, therefore, any
further parley with the Baltimore American upon
the article in question