S We notice the following editorial in
{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1306, "word_count": 237, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9358999729156494], "ccnet_perplexity": [873.7999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
we hotice l4e loiioWlng editorial Tn the Arkansas Intelligencer of the 18th ut.

 "We will give entire the articles of Mr. ! Woodruff, and if possible those of ..Fair Play,'' in ..orter to show the justness of 4she charges made upon Col. Ashley and Mir. Woodruff The reply of the latter gentle man, contained in to-day's paper, we com mend to the perusal of all who wish to un- dersand the truth of the charges; il is long. but forms the base of a series of articles, which in future will be '.skorl and slceei''- We make no defence for lhesgentleman, heis good enough at that himself. and all that we ask is, s'to hear boih sides. E"

 Now, the only reason weshave for trans ferring the above 10 our columns is. for the purpose of merely asking the Intelligencer, to inform us on which page Col. Wood ruff's defence can be found We looked over its columns again and again, to learn what part of it was publisl.el-but to our great surprise we could not find it,

 An editorial of our neighbor ofthez Gag cite, and one of our own, were all that could bepfound by us, that touched the subject mentioned in the article above-except the editorials of the Intelligence. Upon this sshangs mysteryn Is t not more than pro- bable, that the editor did not carefully read the article in question besore publishing il