CORRESPONDENCE

" How glorious ,this invention Of writing, whers
by we can easily communicate TO our absent friend
whatever may afford them pleasure or improvements
HOMEOPATHY VS.. ALLOPATHY.
s8 sdual sla -----ea tiNl HHI c8


No. W. tsEEF 4
{"newspaper_name": "The Columbian fountain.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 758, "word_count": 138, "ccnet_language_score": [0.95660001039505], "ccnet_perplexity": [1633.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In x. US second communication, he al


ludes to trial Of HomoGopalhic treatment 10


one Of the Hospitals Of Eossla. He extracts
the account from the Ms6 Chr. Review for
1891, but as there deis;teds itis gross mis-
statement, not. we are cerasn, on the part Of
the said journal, but Of the source rom which
the information was originally derived. AS
the reviewer does moi give il on his own auiho-
rity. he should have condescended 10 state cor
re.,ly the place where the trials took place


a"u n. une exact daif. "A Ks8. .ss9tfes. :.
The report or story alluded 10, was indlted
oy person Of the name Of Seidliiz (which
name the Med. CHR. Review wisely kept out
OF sight, and had is origin 10 an hospital trial
wnieb took place about seven years previously.