{"newspaper_name": "State journal & flag.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1459, "word_count": 258, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9562000036239624], "ccnet_perplexity": [1146.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The N. Y. Evening Post remarks as fol. lows on the absence of the delegations of that State and Pennsylvania from late Con- gressional Caucus on the TariT bill.

 "But is it probable that the proposed tariff will passl It IS pretty sure, we are told, that it will have majority of eight or ten in the Senate, if il reaches that body the only difficulty will be to obtain for it ma. lorlty in the House of Representatives. We want, it is said, ten votes for the new tariff from lhe State of New York.

 "Yel il is remarkable that none of the New York members attended the consultation on Friday night. There was no member pre- sent from Pennsy lvania, which we should regard as a matter of course. But that every .member from New York should ab- sent himseli--every member from State where ne free trade doctrine has struck root so vigorously among the agricultural

 opulalon, and where vast and populous community Is dependant upon commerce for it's very evlstence-lhal not n member from such State. not even more the great me tFOpOllS m "hlch We Wflte, Shculu nave taken interest enough in lhe question 10 trouble himself with the preliminary arrangements Tor bringing in bill to repeal the prohibi. tory system. Is what we confess we cannot explain. The mo.nbe may perhaps justi fy themselves to their constituents, but the only ettctua mode of doing so, will be a hearty co-operalion in every future attempt 10 break down and destroy that odous sys. tenn"