{"newspaper_name": "The Arkansas banner.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1260, "word_count": 230, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9817000031471252], "ccnet_perplexity": [500.20001220703125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
marked, that Woodruff attempted to explain away the objectionable features in it, to democrats and very much in the same manner that he has done in the last Gazette. But, he failed then to give any satisfactory for it. Has he given one in the last Gazette! Let those who read his statement, decide!

 Woodruff says he went more for men, in his con- nection with the Gazette, up to 1886, than he did for measures. We would ask him now, if he is not doing the same thing2 endeavoring to do so, if he can procure disorganizing press to aid him in the accomplishment of his long cherished pref erence for Mea and Federalism, against Democracy and Measures! Let the columns ofthe Gazette, for the last five or six weeks, answer!

 What claim does Wm. E. Woodruff suppose he has on us to publish any communication from him, in reference to our remarks about the Banner not reaching our subscribers regularly, after his abuse of us in unmeasured terms, for making the remarks? He did not call us and complain of any injustice done him; but became angry and abusive in the post office. This we presume he would not yen ture to do out of that office, or in our presence.

 The only parting consolation we have to offer Woodruff this week, 10 appease his wrath, is to

 