From the Riehmpnd Enquirer Of thi. morning


EXAMINING COURT. ...a.,,s rrs
{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": "W. u. MYERS, s. S. MYERS, AND W. g. BURR Ac\n\n\n= --,--- OItITTEn -"}
{"character_count": 1226, "word_count": 212, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9416000247001648], "ccnet_perplexity": [1288.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
W u MYERS, s. S. MYERS, AND W. g. BURR Ac


'.. Quilted,


The case OF the Commonwealth VS.. Messrs. NV
ers and Burr, was resumed before the huslnss
court on yesterday. The court, (who have All
along manifested praseworthy pstenoe,) was en-
gagged during the whole day from l0l, a M, until
quarter past p. M, IN listening to the arguments
Of the counsel


After Mr.. Mayo had concluded the case on behalf
Of the prosecution, MIR. Lyons opened in behalf OF
the defence. His speech received the profound at
tentlon Of large audience, and it's conclusion was
marked by an outburst ofspplause, Mr.. Gusiayus
A. Myers followed on the sumo side in an ingenious
argument ~ t


Nh. r. c. Scott concluded the Argument Tor the
defence. It's ability universally recognized, and
there we're occasional interruptions by paudiis al.
though il was in court OF Justice Mr.. Mayo
wound up the whole case in behalf Of the pfosecu.
tion, Ia an elaborate and candid argument.


The vote then taken, and the court, by vol.
Of FIVE to two, discharged the parties from ali Il, T.
ther prosecution. The announcement Of this rps,.b
was received with enthusiastic shouts Of applause
from crowded court room, which we cannot trust
ourselves TO describe,