eUNnEI CUND IN THE FIELD AGAIN.
{"newspaper_name": "The daily union.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 805, "word_count": 149, "ccnet_language_score": [0.965499997138977], "ccnet_perplexity": [1090.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We welcome again to our columns the pen Of .
correspondent who has already made his 'H0"' d
plum" famous all over the country as that Of Ons Of
the ablest and most Jealous sssaants Of the tariff
of 1912 We are glad to see him in the field again
lust at this momenl-in the crisis Of the bat.
tie. We need not add word to his defence Of
himself against the special charge to which he nov
makes reply. This charge, however, Of seeking to
diminish the wages Of labor, is ohen urged by the
protectonists against the advocates ola liberal com
mercaI policy and it forms, in the various shapes
which il assumes, no small feature in the system Of
sophistry which styles itself ''argu'"sn" for re-
striction. We are very willing to leave It's expo
sure and reutAion to the strong and Practsed hand
of "Bundelcund."