{"newspaper_name": "New-York daily tribune.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 971, "word_count": 164, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9257000088691711], "ccnet_perplexity": [2101.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
EgN Joseph Andrers' writes US cavil against
the passage OF any law Furnishing Concubuage or
the least culpate form of Sexual Lcentiousuess. As
we have advocated any such enactment, his queries
full pon,lcss. What have urged is the enactment OF
legal penalties for Seduction and aiuAery-esch of them


serant crime sssus, the peace and happiness of the
community, and of them the breach OF solemn
covenant which the Law processes to sanct or and pro
tect. We have not urged the puuis hment Of simple
Lewdncss or mere immortality but OF acts resulting in
snguish and misery other than the consenting par
ties. On what principle OF Jurisprudence such
be consistently let unpuuished As TO Furnishing
Lewdness i, will be think of that after the pend
ing question shall have been disposed Of but cannot
see how The Lsw can consistently punish honest Gam
bling and unlicensed Tipping YET leave City swarm
ing with notorious Liber,nes and es, ering with its
thousands OF Brolhels