{"character_count": 1282, "word_count": 230, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9751999974250793], "ccnet_perplexity": [1169.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
sHf. RdadotphS WaH.-A membad the bar furnishes the Richmond COnplk with a communication, on the saHectd Mir. Randolph's will, and the 'slaw of th case," from which the following IS d- tract:

 ''It is believed that the written willy which Mr. Randolph emaneipated his shya was made in 1922; and afterwards in lSa he made two successive wills, one in JanG ary and the other in March of that ysag neither of which contained any such pf vision. If the question of cmanclpada rested here, the will of 1922 would q course be controlled by those of later dale' But 1t has been repeatedly stated that duuIs the last sickness of Mir. Randolph Vls he was in Philadelphia, he called on FFl. sons present to take notice that ' was his will that the provisions 2 that instrument which contemplated R emancipation of his slaves should be ca0' fully carried into effect. This verbal Y cognition of the provisions of the old VII ing can only be regarded as nllr'cupaa'' will; and that writing must of c0'lIse ,1f Y found, to ascertain what the aas '. rected by his nuncupative will. And n'a the question will arise, lst. Wheiasl 7 emancipation can be made by a nlaca% tive will in any case; and 2dly' Wlel',@ l.aI, th;S casa +bo ,,,,,,o,,,at;va will could reyoM the two written wills made in 1852.