{"character_count": 1213, "word_count": 208, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9501000046730042], "ccnet_perplexity": [587.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Washington Globe, of yesterday, remarks, in relation to the Oaia6ama ques- ton.

 "The Governor of Alabama, in his argu- ment, seems to proceed upon the principle asserted in the case of Georgia and the rherozees. But they are entirely different. The dominion over the Cherokee lands in Georgia belongs to Georgia. In the Creek country in Alabama, the lands belong to the United States, and no white persons, whether officers or otherwise. have any right to enter and hold possession of the territory belonging to the United States, but at the will of the government of the U. States"

 We have read the correspondence be- tween the Governor of Alabama and the Secretary of War, and believe that the Gen. eral Government is doing what is right and even obligatory. But Georgia was no less in the wrong than Alabama, and her max inns cover the case ofthe latter. The Cher okee lands belonged not to the State of Georgia, but 10 the Indians; and the "dem- ination" which has been asserted, Is against their rights and against treaties winch are tho supreme law of the land. President Jackson's concurrence with the Georgia It. surpahon will ssretum to plaguen him in all discussions of the kind.-.Nottoaai Gaz. 