NATcnEz, Miss. Anc. 1G.
{"character_count": 715, "word_count": 128, "ccnet_language_score": [0.90420001745224], "ccnet_perplexity": [1446.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 Jadteia-ImPoriat Decision. ,ast Week very interesting constitutional oness ton, came up for the first time in fhis State upon d a liabeas Corpus, before Chancellor le question was, Whether a person who had committeda felony in one State eo,,ld without any previous demand from the I.y2 eepiiFe e, of said State, be arrested h f5is otale ey ! justice of the peQce, and com mltted to prison here, on proof of the com mssion of the crime, until such req sonablo silne could elapse as would enable tbe evs eeedye of the State where the crime was committed to demand the fugitive aftas 1eii .q and elaborate argument by Eli Huston 1.s'l' on the one side, and Robt. J. IEaIlF' sf and fAm. gannerson, Esqs. on the otl,.