{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1219, "word_count": 211, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9768999814987183], "ccnet_perplexity": [1266.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
the tariff Certainty 10 such understanding existed
in the circles where The writer OF this letter moved,
nor does he believe there was any such general u'i-
dcrstanding of MIR. Adam,'s hostility to the tarif


As to Mr.. Adams friends. they were divided in
opinion on the subject, as will appear by referring
to them votes.


Mr.. M'kean, and those who copy and publish his
letter, ought certainly far to respect themselves, il
they do not public opinion. as to refrain from cast
ng upon the respectable convention at Harrisburg
wholesale mputatlons Of corrupt and improper mo-
lives. uat they have at least some shadow OF eyl-
dence upon which to ground their assertions.


THOMAS WHiPPLE, Jr.


Wentworth, Oct 10. 1927.


r 1t is well known that the opposition to the Tariff
by the Delegates from New-England, was qua
a opposition : the ground taken by Mr. Webster,
aud by many Of the pers NAL and political friends
i Mr.. Adams. was, that he bill embraced in lis
provisions articles in relation to which the argu
men, from policy and espedeney had no application
while to others it applied with u questionable force
and in this they were followed and supported by
many distinguished men Of all parties:
n. H. Journal