From, the Baltimore Patriot.
JACKSONlSM IN TENNESSEE.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2574, "word_count": 445, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9498000144958496], "ccnet_perplexity": [1170.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Tennessee legislature has passed set Of re-
Solutions with .san argument" with but two dis


enug votes, declaring that the constitution OF the
u States should be amended as toglve the election
nf President .sdrectly and conclusvely" to the peo-
pie. This is not objectionable F; but they also de


clare, that the measures of til, present admins
trann Of the General Government are injurious to
the interests and dangerous to the liberties Of the
cOGnirY'-.s that the surest remedy tor these evils
now in the power Of the people. is the election Of
.4nareU Jackson to the chief maglstracy OF the
Union" This is the substance of the resou-
tuns but . the argument" which occupies nearly
two columns Of closely printed matter and which
was also adopted with the resolutions by legisla-
tive body Of one of the members of this union, IS
one Of the most singular productions which the pre-


sent controversy has given birth to, altogether un-
paralleled III the history of politics. Io give our
readers an idea of it few sentences will SUFFICE
The 9 arguments" appears to be an explanatory ap
pendix to the resolutions, which form text for IT,


IT distinctly charges MIR. Adams and Mr. Clay win
corruption in the last presidential election 70
prove whchit says, . Mr. Adams desired the ONCE
OF President-he went into the combination whont
IT. and came out with it, MIR. Clay desired that of
Secretary of State-he went into the combination
without it, and came out with it. This 1t mus, be
confessed. is a summary and novel way OF arguing
polat The sages of Tennessee might as well nave
said, that the fact that Mr.. Adams was elected
proved that he owed his election to corrupt means
They enter into long argument OH the propret,
OF admitting circumstantia testimony IN the case


but do nut tell US what the circumstances are tina


prove the existence of combination" to etiec
the election of Mr.. Adams, other than the assume
fact that Mr.. Adams and Mr.. Clay were hostile t


each other. Falling therefore to prove the fact tha


a cnnbinaton" was formed. any inference d.


duced FROM unnamed - circumstances relative


the effects of this supposed - combnation," is wors
than ridiculous. They create or imagine premise


dream Of circumstances. and thence draw concl


sions' A..er iuduIgng in "a fanfaronade


nonsense" relative to the Panama mission, sayir
N that it has exposed us to IS The rdcule and censu
:, Of foreign natons," (what foreign nations Engar


was also repr tented at the Congress Of Panama


oey say "it will be we'll fur our country itit nyol