For tie LPiimingtmlan.
{"newspaper_name": "The Wilmingtonian, and Delaware advertiser.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 820, "word_count": 154, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9491999745368958], "ccnet_perplexity": [1336.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mr.. Editor-Although inmured in the
dark hole on the hill, permitme again to ap-
pear in your useful journal, to exhibit to
its readers the absurdity and arrogancy of
the remarks of an" in reply to Lodge
Hill" in your last number, and as ''brevity
is the soul of w.t." we will conhne ourselves
to the subject in dispute. n. recently APP
peared in your columns with an arithmeti-
Cal question to be solved-Lodgc Hill had
the wonderful audaclty to propose all answer
---annihilation must then ensue, and the
hole must be our doom. Such egotism and
folly AS n. has exhibited, argues not we'll
but to the subject: the question that N. pro-
posed, he has not yet wrought. In his an
swer to +. he says he makes use of no multi
plication whatever He then, in the same
column, says. suppose then we multiply
- G. M


9 90 9


RV