From lie u. S. Gazette.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1742, "word_count": 302, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9537000060081482], "ccnet_perplexity": [1359.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
IMrtf,rI Concenioa. have noticed in the
proceedings of several political meetings, and in
the editorial columns of different opposition papers
frequent reference TO Mr.. Adams as being intimate
tey connected with the measures Of the Hartford
onven1ion---some. indeed, speak OF him, as 1t
r,cmler Dir promoter Of that meeting Without Of
erng any0plnion upon the proprety or error OF that
convention we may be permitted to say, that the
reproach is cast upon MIR. Adams with an extreme
" bad grace. 1t was a measure OF the Federal
lartv of New England in 1919.


He was not claGed by them as partizan, nor
did he seek favour at their hand. Ii our memory
serves us we'll the measure OF the Hartford Con
yrnton was proposed in Fanueil Hall, by MIR. Pick
eripp, a, present the most jealous opponent OF Mr.
Adams. Some of the warmest friends Of that mea-
sure, are row among the active partlzans of Gen.
Jackson--and now many papers that hold an esti-
mabe ank from the talents of their editors. once
employed in the defence Of that measure, are warm
IL enllsted in the ranks Of the opposition These


facts must be obFiou, to every person capable o OBJ
servaton--and when such persons continue their as
sertinns. opposed to their own knowledge, they rem
der themselves liable, at least to ridicnle.


Our observations meant to correct an error,
not to promote party views. 1t is doing injustice to
the public, TO place daily before the community. as
truth, what few minutes enquiry would show to be
f,l,e--and those who, from day to day. connect
the name Of Mr.. Adams, with the promoters OF
Che Hartford Convention, show themselves mlsera
bly deficient i'll Il knu~ledge of their country ) his


tory or lamentably destitute Of a regard for trath