From Tie National Journal.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1284, "word_count": 217, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9805999994277954], "ccnet_perplexity": [915.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
writer in the Richmond Enquirer, adopting the
signature of Ploughman," has amused himself
with making series of observations on MIR. Bucba-
mans letter. He ridicules the attempt which has
been made by some of the opposition papers, (the
Telegraph acting as bell-weather.) "to reconcile
the statement Of MIR. Buchanan with that of Gen.
jackson there is discrepancy between them
(says he) that is irreconcable." We call on the
Editor Of the New York Evening Post, by all his
reputation for ability, by all his love of chiyary, by
all his hope Of political salvation, to come forward
and defend his own revised opinions and not to
suffer himself to be thus pricked by hobnail.'
$ Poughman'' charges Mr.. Buchanan with being
g uncandd'' and displaying too much anxiety t6
defend his own reputation yet he again tells US
that MIR. Buchanan has reputation to defend, fol
that 6 ,,iae-tenhs of the American people were to
tally ignorant of his existence, until his recent col
lision with General ]. :" and again, that he is 81


man, whose political pre-eminence is perfect ephe


meron; !" adding, for the information of the friend
of General Jackson, that ephemeron is, sa thin


Of Yesterday" All this is very complimentary t


Mr.. Buchanan.


: Waxing warmer as he proceeds, g ploughman