{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1182, "word_count": 196, "ccnet_language_score": [0.958299994468689], "ccnet_perplexity": [1089.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
tion to make such charge against Mr.. Clay and
that his JMr. Kremers) letter never was intended
to convey the ideas given to it. The substance of
the above conversation Immediately communicate
ell to Mr.. Buchanan and Mr.. Hemphill, of Penn
sylvania, and Mr.. Dwight, Of Massachusetts, Of the
House of Representatives.


VIM. BRENT, ofLouisiana.
Feb. 26, 1925.


was present. and heard the observations as above
stated in conversation between Mr. Brent and Mr..
Kremer PETER LITTLE, of Md.
In the National Journal, | perceive my name
mentioned, as to conversation which took place in
the Lobby Of the House ofRepresentatives between
Mr. Brent oil louisiana, and Mr.. kremer, and feel
hesitation in saying that Mr.. Brent's statement in
the paper of this day is substantially correct.


WILLIAM DUDLEY DlGGES.
Mdrch 1 1926.


We will add here as a fact ofsnf1icient importance
to be known and remembered, that as soon as the
statement prepared it was submitted to Mr. Kre-
mer, who was requested to examine it, and, if he
discovered any inaccuracy, to suggest such altera-
tions as he might deem necessary We are informed
that he made no objectionto any part otlt


National Journal.