{"newspaper_name": "The Litchfield County post.", "edition": "01", "page": "p4", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1582, "word_count": 286, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9764999747276306], "ccnet_perplexity": [714.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
largement, Or a respite from our galling Op precision. Besides all thss, it was unqUestiOna- bly owing in a chief degree to the repeated eloquence, and fOrcible appeals of Mrs. Jud- son. that the untutored Birman was finally made willing tO secure the welfare and happi- ness of his country by sincere peace."

 Ledther and PruHeiIa.-A writer in the Mer- rimack Journal has opened a battery against the fashion of wearing cloth shoes by the la dies. He says, with good justice: .

 "If there is any one constant practice that deserves execratiOn, this is it. Examine the many cases of consumption and decline now prevalent throughout our country and it will be found that first of all, the patient byscloth shoes got her feet wet which caused slight cold-before the first cold was fairly cured a second one was taken by the same careless ness and so it continues until a consumption is seated-whGn after lingering few months death ends the scene. It fact which pre- sume will not be disputed, that twenty females at least are carried out of the world by con- sumption where one male is. l believe this cannot be accounted for in any other manner than that men are not tenth part so careless of their health as ladies are. You can scarcely name prudent man who will consent to have his feet wet by thin shoes, two or three times a week; on the contrary many take a meth ed to have their boots water proof. If the la- dies think that lasting, or valentia or satin shoes are handsomer than those made of kid or leather, they are sadly mistaken, at least in the opinion of the gentlemen