{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2163, "word_count": 383, "ccnet_language_score": [0.973800003528595], "ccnet_perplexity": [1339.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
this community, that the Editor Of whom we speak,
is not narvellously troubled with principles OF any
sort. Opinions are his merchandise. and if he has
not always found profitable market for them. he
has doubtless sometimes consoIed himself upon the
consideration OF their quality. We would advise
him never again to oHer reason for change 0f
timent--uhess he should be able to show snbstan-
tia one something that will chink. He is now advo-
! eating the cause OF Gen. jackson Would any
Adams man like to know how to silence his bate.
ry! We can tell them. bGP" Put money in thy
purse"


Ridiculous nonsense! The Enquirer and the
Evening Post To pretend to account for change Of
opinion concerning Gen. jackson. No such change
has taken place. The voice of the men has indeed
changed but false face doth hide what the false
heart doth knows The Enquirer says. 'opinions of
public men constantly liable to change in conse-
quence of the different positions in which they may
be placed."-This sentiment contains just about
that degree of proprety and soundness which might
be expected from man who.


lis every thing by fits and nothing long"


No honest man, orindependent mind would fash.
ferent positions in which they may be placed" The
truth is, in apprehension, that the absure and
most irreconcilabe contradictions which we have
pointed out in the public declarations Of the Post
and Enquirer are chargeable entirely and exclusive
ly to want of any uniform and stable political
principle.


1t is indeed common to change opinions and to
commit errors but we shall not consent, nor will
others, to be dunced so much as to believe
ment that the Editors of the Enquirer and Post know
any thing more now of General Jackson's fitness for
the Presidency than they did some years ago. Then
he was every thing that dangerous, cruel and y-
rannical, and if he was so then he he is so STILL


We doubt not while the Editor is honest in his
zeal, patriotic in what he says. not mercenary but


- ~
such men only as are fit for office. his pages may be
turned over in vain for contradictions which will af
feet his character or call in question his motives Of
yeracity.