{"character_count": 4631, "word_count": 799, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9218000173568726], "ccnet_perplexity": [2262.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
= = ZIG 4-'thSA FepHOE9cdn party were oTlSt-
ginally obb3ed to the contribution, ihall now
from this g frsciont c0nfsGoa" Of Mr.. Jeffrifon
endeavour TO prove that their deiign and prin
ciPal Object is and yet qvW BE- TO DESTROY
IL Nay, tart not, Jacobins-you are not
[" Gaaid nlsg"!


ESSAY ".


1T IS not eafy for political party to be
converted. Appearances of this kind are ge-
nerAly ta!lacious, except in the well-meaning
part Of the maj, Of followers who ronetmes
yield to argument, but always 10 favourable
events. But oPPofJion. parties are never form
ed upon The abltra6t principle that COVER nnent
IS wrong, and 70 they never yield on evidence
that government is right. Il was therefore to
tn be expected that the embryo Tacobns Of the
UGited States would make he bclt Rand they
could againR the adminiltration of confiitu
ton, which they had n vain conteAed the fiaal
ratification. But We n al have to look deeper
tor political malice of which no country has
10 patiently turnilhed The example before, that
OF iobveriing III lntfrument Hlelf, and reducing
things TO the Primsval chaos, or in more
faihonlbie language e tembeluouJ far of un-
adociated man. Let The Wee prehdent thew
the views and courage Of his party.


Though the Anglo. Monarchio Ariltocratic
party had fue ceejed r. far as to give Us, 1--WE
ought to blets them FOR it J the conatui los,
" nsUsrt5slss" Eays Mr.. JeF4rfon q s6e principal
+" "b0Gy Of ar citizen5 RE MAIN. .fait6fal TO re-
g publican byinciBie5" This fnells of falhood,
for how could a PFincipil part Be Of a different
4entimeat from the principal part Certainly
the contribution was adopted By the majority.
But lhtl BE anlwered this was ony by ma
jorities of all TIE coaveatians. There is no ether
anfwer, AMI this is truly republican, for even
rebrsisHtaiiUs governments are too tyrannical,
and ali delegated authority is " bsretical' with
the pure and perfect lons of liberty, equality,
and fraternity. The " fsmbeR4ou5 jsa'' is their
elem mt, and has certainly this advantage IN
favour Of the political bark, that it has no
thore. AS to rocks, quickfands, wh;rlpools,
wat-r-(pouts and hurricanes, and more efpecial-
ly good Rock of ammunition and provifons,
thele things are beyond reb45fcaa f,ra (ieht, and
beneath republican care. "Lfe eps bsyijb, 4us per-
;8." is their prudence, and eteiHal 2eeb" their
copfol't1u.


The Vice-preGdent fhoots with the long bow
again when he lays I" m CIR br0triefors of Laadt
g are friendly 70 tbg b,iatibLs, ar ala The men Of
'' tglsHtJ"-Now it is undeniable after what |
have demnnltrated, that VII ,tever thele republican
principles were, they were anti icOzAituti0aal
principles, Propriet Ors Of lands Men Of tai
ems were you not bafelY calumniate1, NOT
wlntonly tradu-ed BY this aieriion Men Of
talents has not your clafs principle Of accu-
racy. and foul Of honour, to expel from your
college this unprinciple1 babler ?-In the fame
brea.h he fays that SoLoMoNs IN COUNCIL
ba0e embraced tbsf berefss." Mla Il be the
eternal fate Of Jacob narn to beat out its own
little brains This man who will not be ruled
that two majoIities are more than the whole,
nor perceive that AL I. is total without excep-
tion, is at the head Of phi olophy in ths United
States. | wonder whether il be natural or
moral philolophy. Both mathematics and
ethick, of the old fort would have rejected f1ch
petitions. But there is one comfort-the new
philolaphy rejects norhing


g They ovoaid taks from u5 that liberty evbic5
60 10 haze abtaiHed By % maeb Gbour and ber, but
g qvs A0H brefrvs H.'' This cldufe referring
20 the Z" Arglo- MoaErcbo. Arjgacratie barty," now
reduced to the federal government, is tanta-
noupt to determination to overthrow the con-
fttution, more Especially when taken in con
ne6tion with preceding clauie, viz. NE haze
agaigR af (r ~ a5icaaJJ tbs Exeepfive pozUer, t6e
Taaiciary Po7psr, all the etnsr5 Of g0Oernnent, &C.
for party is well delcribed by its oppoGte
party as BY its own character. What one
would take is ell underRood by what the other
would keep, and what one would keep by what
the other would take. SO here, though the
deceptive and hyPocrtical word liberty is uled
for what the Jacobins would keep, yet as the
government intend to take away Rothing but
what The contribution has taken, liberty is not
the thing, but merely unconstitutional diforder /;
and again, as the government mean to keep
the conaitution, 70 that is what the Jacobins
would take away. It's a prsci0a5 coEta9on"
that thele branches Of the government are a.
gaina the Jacobns, becaufe it proves that the
Iacobins are againf thefe branches and whe-