Correct implementation for wrap_powf
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ double __wrap_logf(double x)
return logf(x);
}
-double __wrap_powf(double x)
+double __wrap_powf(double x, double y)
{
- return powf(x);
+ return powf(x, y);
}
double __wrap_expf(double x)
