" 
 ::::I've tweaked a few things. There is still an issue with the number of dwarf planets. Stating that there are five is misleading without also stating that there hundreds of candidates. I would add a figure for ""No. of dwarf-planet candidates: ..."", but where would be the cut-off? When would something still be a candidate and when would it not be? Brown's list includes a set that are 'probably not' dwarf planets but ""A few of these object could be bigger than expected, however, and could turn out to be large enough to round themselves."". This description suggests that these can be considered candidates, although very weak.   "