:: You're not making any sense.  Why would it be a contradiction to say that 'something only happens amongst a small minority' therefore, 'it shouldn't be given prominence in the article'.  Mdwh is not coming off as biased at all.  You're the one who seems to come off as biased, constantly asking for original research to be included in the article even while there's little evidence to sustain it, and then making statements that seem to reflect your own hostility to the subject matter (as your last sentence does).  Wikipedia policy says that articles should be NPOV, so why do you keep insisting that deleting POV statements is a negative thing?  In an article about Jews, do we have to keep in a section on 'Jews all being rich and greedy' because that constitutes one POV about them?  That would seem a bit silly to suggest that.  Mdwh has not tried to defend all goths from criticism.  He/she is merely trying to make the article more neutral in its point of view.