"  
 ==Title== 
 For a lot of people ""radical right"" is just synonymous with ""far right.""  I suggest moving this to Radical right (United States) or something like that and redirecting the current title to far right.   
 :As explained in the article the term radical right was chosen by social scientists and is the most commonly used term in academic writing.  The term far right is generally used in a more narrow sense to describe nazis, skinheads and hate groups, although there is overlap.  See for example The Routledge companion to fascism and the far right.  They seem to be more interested in holocaust denial and racial theory and are more likely to resort to criminal activity to obtain their goals.     

 ::Well, I'm dubious but I can't really challenge your expertise. If you're planning on doing more work on this article it would probably benefit from some content explaining the difference between ""radical right"" and ""far right"" and the various uses of the term; even that Routledge book gives a very different definition than the one you give in this article.   

 :::I will add a section about the use of terminology.     
 :::I have now added it.  Reading through the literature it is easy to see how the use of terminology differs among different writers, but it is hard to find sources that discuss the use of terminology.  Do you think the new section adequately explains the terminology or would it benefit from more detail?     

 ==US emphasis== 
 Re:  the label ""The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject."" 

 The article states, ""Radical Right is a term used to describe various American political movements....  From the 1990s parties that have been described as radical right became established in the legislatures of various democracies....  However, scholars are divided on whether these parties are radical right, since they differ from the groups described in earlier studies of the radical right. They are more often described as populist."" 

 The Right in the US and that in the rest of the world are studied separately, and there is little literature that compares the phenomenon.  There is an article about the other Right under Right-wing populism.   

    

 :As there has been no reply, I have now removed this tag and also the single source tag, since there are now 10 sources used.     

  
 == ""Radical Right"" for U.S. is being written from a Radical left point of view ==  

 This description is utterly absurd political propaganda:  
 Re: ""readiness to jettison constitutional processes and to suspend liberties"" 

 This is the polar opposite of the American hard right, who's core ideology is to RETURN to the literal writings and processes in the Constitution. This description is political smearing and misinformation, period.  There is also a section attempting to describe U.S. Republicanism as being radical right?  Seriously?  I worry for our next generations if they are learning the liberal re-writing of history through Wikipedia.     

 == ""The Second Ku Klux Klan"" is not radical right wing ==  
 This absurd accusation is also intentional political misinformation, in the never-ending quest by liberals to paint the right as being racists. The KKK was originally formed by Democrats for the purpose of harassing white Republicans.  The Later KKK this addresses was deeply with the Democratic Party (i.e. the LEFT). Senator Robert Byrd (a Democrat) who was in Congress up until his death in 2010 was a KKK officer right through the 1960's.  There has never been any tie whatsoever between the KKK and the political right in America. (Not that the oligarchy of liberal gatekeepers on WP would have any interest in telling real history, though)   
 ::That's absurd.  Byrd was a CONSERVATIVE Democrat...a