"****Thanks for your thoughtful reply, WebHamster. I don't appreciate your characterization of others' good faith arguments as ""spouted bullshit"", and you're appropriately blocked for that kind of crap now, but I'll go ahead and respond to the substance of what you said.  ""Let's be realistic here, the likelihood of someone visiting this page without some clue as to what it is is highly unlikely."" Actually, it's 100%. It's certain that it will happen - indeed, that it happens regularly. I looked at some stats regarding our ""random article"" button, and it gets hit often enough that any particular article pops up when that link is clicked... roughly once every 24 hours. Even ignoring that, it's not any kind of stretch to think that some joker will get some naïve ""noob"" to click on a link that takes them to that page. If you think that won't happen, then I can't think you've been on the Internet much. Ever been ""Rick rolled""?  ""Censorship involves group A deciding what group B can see"". What group B can see. According to every suggestion so far made, group B will still be able to see it. If I don't control what someone else ""can see"", then I don't censor. Nobody's even suggesting making it difficult to fine. One click. I see no censorship here, not according to any reasonable definition. -  

 "