:I've removed that mention of the Olympics - now a rather outdated bit of promotion. I've also removed some of the material introduced by , an account now blocked as a sock of . One account was used to denigrate Clifford Chance, the other to promote this firm - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jfmisha/Archive. We were left with an article whose history section relied heavily on the company web-page and material copied from it to a blog (neither a reliable source for our purposes), dwelt at extraordinary length on nineteenth-century clients and their titles and positions, mentioned the Bank of England three times in three consecutive sentences and otherwise indulged in puffery and WP:PEACOCK terms, set every sentence in a new paragraph and was altogether so blatantly promotional that it would have embarassed Freshfields themselves. And that's just one section - there's more to do. 
 :Re sourcing, the history section is still heavily reliant on a book published by Freshfield, which can't be counted a reliable source for our purposes.