" 
 ==Break== 

 I answered here. Obviously no reply.    
 :""Obviously""? This is an international encyclopedia and I do not edit 24h a day or necessarily on the same schedule you do. Your comment here is a borderline personal attack. I strongly recommend you take a step back and read the ""Welcome"" section on your talkpage and its links about how to participate constructively here, as you are engaging in several patterns of behavior that can lead to having your edit-privileges revoked. Other readers should note that the message to me was presumably in my warning to Mauro Lanari about edit-warring, which is forbidden on its face and unrelated to whatever content-issue led to it.    
 ::Mauro, your complaint to DMacks has nothing to do with the current discussion. It has to do with your attempts to link to the 2012.com page, which is discussed above. Please hear me when I say: you do not understand English. You do not read it well, or write it well, and thus you are not following the conversation properly. Also, you cannot expect us to understand what you want if you cannot convey it with proper English grammar. Please find someone you know who speaks English better and can speak on your behalf. Until you do there is little that can be gained through argument. As far as your complaint to DMacks re:2012.com goes, just because other sources have cited it, that doesn't mean that Wikipedia can. Wikipedia has very strict rules about what can and cannot be added to this site. Other publications are free to link to whatever they want. That has nothing to do with Wikipedia's stated position.  

 [Edit: As this is interfering with the actual discussion, I broke it and moved it down].   
 ::Reading things like this or that, I do not believe that for you the main problem is to understand my English and my arguments on eschatology, external links and categories, but that you need twelve edits in an hour only to hide you are wasting my concepts. Best regards. Mauro Lanari    
 :::WP:TPG if we are going to discuss editor behavior we should probably go elsewhere.    
 :::Er, hide? Do you think I'm that stupid? How could I have ""hidden"" what I wrote? I rewrote the comment because it took me a very long time and several rereadings to understand what you had actually written. When I did, I rephrased the comment.   

 ==break=="