" 

 == Request for Advice - ""wisdom"" == 

 This is a really important topic. The major problem is the word ""wisdom""(""Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast""). 

 Wisdom is a big word, in fact many types of thoughts and ideas can be called ""wisdom"". Since ""wisdom"" is such a big word, almost anything can be used to interpret. 

 That's the problem. However, I found ""wisdom"" explained in Book of Revelation, and that's what I'm trying to add to this Wikipedia article: 

 ""Wisdom"" in Book of Revelation 
 {| style=""margin: 5px 0 5px 40px; background: none;"" 
 |- style=""vertical-align:top;"" 
 ||17:3 
 ||So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 
 |- style=""vertical-align:top;"" 
 ||17:9 
 ||And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sat. [King James Version; the New International Version Bible and the New American Bible use ""hills"" instead of ""mountains""]. 
 |- style=""vertical-align:top;"" 
 ||17:12 
 ||And the ten horns which thou saw are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. 
 |} 

 Please note what I'm trying to add is an important element of this topic, and its source is Bible. I'd like to hear your advice on this ... 

 PS 
 Some content of this article is from dieyu.org ... It's ""original research"" on this topic which I'm not adding to Wikipedia. 

 Regards,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 :Hi - I reverted you before I saw this. Thanks for asking your advice. Basically, we shouldn't simply be taking quotes from the Bible and using them in this way, but should be finding sources meeting our criteria at WP:RS and using what they say about the biblical source. Note that if it's disputed, then we show the significant views in proportion to their significance - see WP:NPOV.    
 :REPLY: Thanks for the advice. Understood.  
 ::Wikipedia is not a primary source.  We do not simply reprint primary sources without explanation.  We're not a secondary source either (but a tertiary one), so that explanation must come from another secondary or tertiary source.     
 ::REPLY: Thanks. Understood. 

 Sigh, what I'm trying to do, is to alert people about 666. I take this so seriously, because I'm Dieyu(check dieyu.org to see what it means). In fact, I have ""wisdom"". I'm going to add some really serious content to this ""talk"" page - it's ""original research"", meanwhile, it's the truth. I hope it won't be deleted. It's the truth of this topic. (I respect Wikipedia and won't add ""original research"" to the main article. I only add this to ""talk"" page, which is allowed here as far as I observed ...) 

 First, in the context of Book of Revelation, ""wisdom"" is never about number of a name ... Since ""wisdom"" is a super big word, almost anything can be used to interpret - God wouldn't allow any misunderstanding, so ""wisdom"" is in fact explained in Book of Revelation: 

 Bible said, ""where the whore sat, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues"". 

 Bible said, ""a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns"". 

 Bible said, ""And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sat."" 

 Bible said, ""And the ten horns which thou saw are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast."" 

 Summary: 

 ""woman sit"" - ""peoples"" / ""beast"" - ""seven mountains"" and ""ten horns"" - ""wisdom"" 

 The only possible answer is that human has ""seven mountains"" and ""ten horns"". And the only reasonable interpretation is that ""seven mountains"" are two eyes, two ears, two nostrils, and a mouth; ""ten horns"" are human hands - this is where to count in the context of ""wisdom"" in Book of Revelation. This is it. 

 Now, isn't it weird? Why call eye as ""mountain""? And, why cal