" 

 :*That's what people decide during an AfD.  If the problems presented by those who want it deleted are real problems and in that case if they can be fixed.  Assuming good faith, clearly I don't believe this article can be ""fixed"" through normal editing, and likewise assuming good faith you do believe it can, or perhaps that there is nothing to fix.  Is it disruptive to nominate an article one believes cannot be ""fixed through normal editing"" to AfD?  If so, then again you're impugning all AfD nominations, since they are always based on such a belief initially.  If not, then you're rather specifically impugning my motives, suggesting that I am nominating this entry despite believing that it can be fixed.  In other words your assuming bad faith.  There is no way for this to be disruption if you assume good faith, unless, again you think all AfD nominations are disruptive.  Cheers.  "