" 
 :I'm a bit confused about what you're saying here: ""...the misguided premise that people would want to read it unless they specify otherwise?"" In any case, what I was suggesting is that I don't want someone to post ""Eventualists are stupid"" or ""Inclusionists have no faith"" or anything of the sort. I believe preferring no one posts incorrect answers is a given, but saying as much implies people provide answers they know are incorrect. The ""biased drivel"" I was referring to doesn't fall under that category either way. Biased opinions—all opinions, really—are neither incorrect nor correct. I am pointing out that they are irrelevant and have no place in the discussion. You would think that would also be a given, but it happens all too often. Thanks for providing feedback though! )   "