" 
 ::Killer: 
 ::""This discussion has been open since 10 July; ad there is zero need for RM when the article already has competent editors who can move it."" 
 ::Sheer opinion. Why have an established RM process, if it is not necessary to use it even when an admin has said that is what ought to be done (in closing the 2011 RM)? 
 ::""You state you have no opinion; then your complaint is procedural, and I assure you there is no strict procedure for this."" 
 ::And I can assure you that you are wrong. Check WP:RM, and check another admin's ruling on closing the 2011 RM. You do not show any justification for acting against that procedural ruling. Such an action has recently come before ArbCom, with the result that one admin lost his admin rights. 
 ::""You are tilting at windmills."" 
 ::You compound your offences with gratuitous incivility. 
 ::""Now I return to find my ethics are being called into question?"" 
 ::Now, yes. ☺ 
 ::""RM is only for when you canNOT move the page yourself. There is no 'procedure' one must follow."" 
 ::A curious opinion. Do you have any others to declare? Care to test this one at WT:RM? 
 ::Noetica "