::::::::::I don't find Sebbysteiny's argument persuasive. Falk's notability is not based on Israeli or Palestinian opinion. His appointment at the UN was not made by Palestinians. His academic works were not published by Palestinians. Palestinians did not appoint him as professor emeritus of international law at one of Americas most prestigious Universities. His international notability and academic career are not a Palestinian opinions. I don't see any justification of writing this whole article through the prism of the Israel Palestine conflict based on Palestinian and Israeli positions. On the specific points where Palestinian and Israeli viewpoints are significant (e.g. on his role as special rappatuer for Human Rights in the OPT), then by all means they should be included per RS, but the whole biography should not be based on them.