" 

 :You said ""It's too bad your research skills aren't the equal of your computer operating skills. The same could be said of your writing and debating abilities."" But then your said ""I didn't know that Answer is a ""mirror"" of Wiki."" Your research skill is being condemned by your own statement... 
 :And no, we both do not know what you're saying is true. Refer to Fallacy of many questions for argument. That's why everything needs to be cited. Read WP:V. 
 # Have you read Catch-22? You statement is just like that. In away case, it's written in a credible periodical with reputation. Furthermore, it's written back in 1970. 
 # Slew? read back and see who is the one that launched all those personal attack. 
 # A conspiracy theory and paranoia that dictionary is out to brainwash the masses... Ridiculous reasoning. 
 # Oh, you're a Nebraskan now? 
 # If that's so, than I'll remove it. But while removing this, there's no need to remove the others. 
 # Oh, I want too. But first, why don't you back up your assertion first?  

  

  
 "