": The above inane and moronic comment ignores all aspects of modern scientific investigative procedures and guidelines for police work. First: The odds that the exercise that was actually held at ALL the exact same four locations not only ""indicate"" prior knowledge by someone who planned the exersises, it SCREAMS prior knowledge. in investigative terme it makes it actual evidence of prior knowledge. Mathematically you could not ever come closer. Which can only lead us to one conclusion: You sir are either an idiot and or a shill/ agent provocateur. I say this because I'm tired of how these morons get off slandering people as ""conspiracy theorists, note his name calling and his derogatiove tone right through his comment. Secondly, the year prior to the London 77 Bombings the BBC aired its Panorama program, ""London Under Attack""  (""London under attack was broadcast on BBC One on Sunday, 16 May 2004 at 22:15 BST) This film was/is a mock exercise of what might happen in London if there was a terror attack now. 
 - it's ""wash tag"" description goes as follows:  
 ""In a unique fusion of drama, detailed research and expert discussion Panorama puts Britain's emergency plans to the test. 
 Set in the future - but only just - the city of London is thrown into chaos by a series of terrorist attacks. 
 The fictional day of terror unfolds through the immediacy of rolling news bringing the catastrophic attack into our living rooms. 
 As events unfold, Panorama and a team of specialists reveal gaps in our preparations. The eight-strong team includes people with first hand knowledge of intelligence, emergency planning, police, fire, government and media management."" 

 If you look closely at the program you can actually see that among the four(sic!)sites chosen for this mock up program, one of the sites ""coincidentally"" and ""randomly"" chosen to represent the ""terror"" sites is actually tavistock square.. Again..  do we need to actually force feed people who are in denial the direct implications of these facts? We'll have to put people in prison for stupidity soon, because this is tantamount to being a danger to yourself and others. You Sirs should under absolutely NO, _no_ circumstances EVER, be _allowed_ to be a witness, under _any_ circumstances, not even in a case of shoplifting 10 pence candy!!!  

 To make a long explanation short: in propaganda ""expertise"" circles this is considered a technique to make people subconsciously accept things they already ""recognise"". Now for the rest of you idiots out there: do not bother questioning this information. It will only make you hurt more when you realise you've been mistaken. Go to youtube or google video and see ""ripple effect"" before you  
 open your moths or start typing. That documentary is based ENTIRELY on open publicly available information.  

 Quick scan: No they could not have done it. The 7:40 train from Luton and the two next trains were cancelled so all trains were running late, too late to them EVER having been able to get into London in time for the bombings. i.e. Direct evidence that the police leadership is lying to you. There are 4 million cc tv cameras in London. A senior police officers noted as much in the first days and said there would be copious amounts of video footage of the four alleged perpetrators. insted there was NONE.  
 They hav ONE still frame of them. why is it a still frame? because the four men never reached London together so the frame had to be photoshopped, consequently they *CANNOT* show them MOVING together. This is the ONLY scientific investigative approach to the discrepancy between 4 million cc tv cameras and only one fram evidence. IF the government version and the police version WERE true, then ther WOULD be ABUNDANT amounts of EVIDENCE and video of them all over the place! 

 Again. Don't you DARE insult my or any other sane persons intelligence again. We'll make sure you get consequences if this world ever turns sane again. And believe you me, there will be a lot of people really angry about your moronic or not complicity in fogging up the _murder_ of innocent people.. 

 "