I am simply posting a mugshot, something that is a fact and of interest to anyone interested in Ritter's arrest. The only thing immature and annoying are the attempts to remove factual postings about about Ritter's attempt to sexually molest a teenager, which is not in doubt. I read nothing that prohibits the posting of a person's mugshot that is in the public arena.  You have an interpetation about what is permissible to post that is incorrect.  Ritter got himself arrested for being a pervert and you are going through extreme ends to water that fact down. Nothing speaks more to Ritter's arrest in that case that his mugshot. It is relevant and it will be posted. I am willing to compromise and post it only in the external link section. This is Ritter's problem, not yours, mine or Wikipedia's. If you wish, please feel free to explain the situation to a paid employee of Wikipedia and I will be pleased to listen to their input provided it comes with a verifiable Wikipedia employee name and Wikipedia e-mail address, otherwise, it is just another anonymous poster's opinion to which I attach no value to at all.  11:38 pm, 3 October 2006 (UTC)