" 
 ::Sorry, didn't see this at first. Those thoughts on the way you see it would be nice to have sourced. By ""baseline"" I meant what start consensus we can work from, assuming a free flow of discussion toward resolution of differences via understanding and compromise. For instance, would you agree to start from the current versions of ""myths"" and ""claims"" and mediate from there? Now, I don't want to discount your suggestion for article title, because it's the first time I've noticed you to actually propose a compromise that takes account of WP:RNPOV, but I still don't think that title will pass muster with WP:AND, and it wasn't what needs to be resolved first even though it was a good suggestion. Since discussion is quiet now, either we need to restart dialog or I will need to finish the corrections of policy violations by going back to WP:BRD editing. Thank you.  "