" 
 ::::::The above denials are POV, and ironically based on the very argument that was used against the sources I cited.  An editor's POV does not/should not factor in to this discussion, and so far, that is all that has been provided in the arguments against the term's application and ubiquity. The sources I cited pass the acid test for WP:RS - academic and institutional research - and confirm use of the term ""non-Muslim no-go zones or areas"" according to WP:PAG.  Show me the RS that support your position and/or contradict the sources I cited because POV is irrelevant and unacceptable in WP articles.  ☯ "