" 

 ::::OK, so if some reputable and notable source says that ""many scientists are faggots"", then we include that in the 'Science' article as a relevant POV in the spirit of NPOV? Or do we include the statement ""the Pope hates niggers"" in the 'Catholicism' article as long as the source is reliable? The point of not including the 'pseudoscience' comment is that it is irrelevant in terms of the topic. Surely as editors we need to decide whether or not a statement is relevant to the topic?  "