" 

 : The unsigned, angry comments above are inappropriate. ""Pro-Murderer Propaganda"". ""Murder-Groupie"". Lighten up! What I find disturbing is that the article is devoid of anything - anything at all! - that presents another point of view other than guilt. With all due respect, ""He was convicted, so that's that!"" is intellectually lazy. This article needs major work, especially since the defendant adamantly maintains his innocence, and there WERE problems with his trial. The POV garbage above is ridiculous. It is perfectly acceptable to present both sides, which this article does NOT! Proud to sign my name:   "