I'm not a huge fan of buffets so I'm a little biased. \n\nThe buffet is average.  Service sucked, but that's to be expected.  You can't really judge a buffet by the service.  Price is high.  They also split us up because if you have a party of 7 or more they automatically add 18% for tip. We said it didn't matter and we could sit together, but they said they had no room for us and that it was really busy so they split us up anyways.  Oh well... It didn't really matter, but it wasn't that busy :)  I have been for dinner but this review is for both but mainly for lunch.  \n\nFood was average (at least it was edible) \nMost of the meat was overcooked and dry (maybe I came at the wrong time)\nAhi tuna seemed frozen, definitely not fresh or it was soaked in a weird cucumber sauce.\nSeafood selection was minimal at lunch.\nMy mom had the sushi and thought it was dry... I didn't even go near it.\nThe chocolate ice cream had small pieces of ice in it, but it wasn't bad.  Just made it less creamy and a little crunchy.\nThe lemon and apple desserts were good.  Most of the others were not (too generic... very sweet, but no depth)\nI liked the Caulifower, but the brussel spouts were tough.  \nCheese selection was minimal but decent. \n \nNote: I hate wasting food so I try to finish most of my plate. In a buffet, I'll take a small portion of what looks good and try it and go back if I like it.  I can't start with a huge plate and barely eat it... I've learned traveling its wrong to waste food.\n\nThe only time this buffet is worth it is if you have picky eaters or starving crazy large appetite friends or family members.  The price for lunch is too much for what they service.  Dinner is more, but the food seems a little better... However, for the amount you pay, I'd rather be served a meal that they spend time cooking and amending if needed according to my taste.\n\nHonestly, everything looked better than it tasted.