"have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my  tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your  for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing!    

  
 ==Re: Stop it== 
 (Original message, quickly removed from ) 

 I've just had a close look at your last 250 edits, EE. It's interesting. Of the 250, every single edit was on a topic relating to pop music or videogames, except for these: 
 :* Three edits on 19 May to Anastasia (1997 film) 
 :* One edit to Paris, Ontario 
 :* One edit to Milk 
 :* Five edits to Butter and three to Black pepper on 16 May. There are both featured articles mostly written by myself. 
 :* Two image-fiddling edits to S. A. Andrée's Arctic balloon expedition of 1897 today and one to Talk:S. A. Andrée's Arctic balloon expedition of 1897. This article is mostly written by Bishonen. 

 This is a hair's-breadth from stalking. If you want to develop broader editing interests, I recommend it, but find some way of doing it other than hounding articles that you know Bishonen or Bunchofgrapes follow closely. —    

 :I am beginning to become very ill-hearted toward you. I am absolutely not stalking you, I have simply been editing these articles because I was over-looking Wikipedia:Featured articles (with the exception of Bishonen's article, whose I am editing since it was at FAC a little while back and I found all of the support votes from her friends interesting — it turns out it is well-written, but I was still suspicious). In addition, yes, I have edited very many popular culture articles, but I don't understand what you mean by ""video games"" articles at all. Looking at my last 250 edits, ""video games"" can certainly qualify as part of the list you provided me as I do not edit them on a daily basis. I question your motive. 

 :On a different note, I would consider checking each of my contributions to be slightly more stalker behaviour than what I have done thus far. Why am I so interesting to you? Because I have connections to Courtni? What if someone else was doing this, would you care? I highly doubt it — but then, you never know. Yes, I started editing Gwen Stefani articles! Oh my. The return of Mariah or whomever her other pseudonym was. Seriously, I would prefer to edit in utter-most tranquility and peace: I am allowed to edit whatever articles I choose, correct? No, I am not stalking you. I certainly would like to develop a further interest in topics (which is why I edited Anastasia (1997 film), it would make for a nice FA), but please don't accuse me of such intentions. What happened to the fluffy and welcoming outside Wikipedia provided? I decided to register an account because it seemed this way... please don't tell me that this is the depth of the project, which I would cite as threatening. Stop posting on my talk page unless it is necessary, of course. — |   
 ::""I have simply been editing these articles because I was over-looking Wikipedia:Featured articles"". Really? Let's see, there are 984 featured articles right now. I have written four of them. Assuming you picked two FAs at random to edit that day, there is an approximately a one-in-60,000 chance you would pick two of mine. Do you really want to stick by your story that it is a coincidence, or do you want to admit the obvious, say you won't do it again, and move on? —    
 :No, no. I chose one of yours by chance. I knew of the other one because I had come across it a month or two ago and noticed that you had edited it. Butter I had just happened to pick at random. Sorry, but I certainly didn't select two of yours purposely, because, honestly, I have better things to do than worry about you. — |   
 ::So one of the