" 

 Two more things then.  I see you revised the Archive, but placed the material below your and Jehochman's final comments, in fact beyond the whole ""discussion bottom"".  Note, some/many of the comments now cut off were made while the section was titled ""Resolution""; I inserted the ""wikihounding"" label at some later time and then continued commenting within that (and maybe there were others' comments too, i am not now checking).  The current archive presentation suggests incorrectly that you and Jehochman did not see / were not aware of that discussion.  By the way, in Edit view of the Archive, I can see that there is a hidden comment ""original location of wikihounding/false proposals sections"", at the location where they were.  I think the item should be restored to that point, or it confuses matters unnecessarily.   

 Second, I don't happen to like it being collapsed, either.  Collapsing is suited to stopping discussion, which is what you wanted, okay, because you view it offtrack from the AN proposal.  But it does not need to be collapsed in the archive, because it is less readable and cannot be pointed to directly.  The archiving of the whole discussion accomplishes the ending of discussion already.  Is it your judgment, or whose, that the discussion should be collapsed within the archive?  I think it was your judgment or someone's that the stray, non-archived portion left behind by MizraBot should be closed, but that is not the same as your judging the material needs to be collapsed in the archive.  (Or was it consciously collapsed by someone before MizraBot archived the rest?  I currently think it was just an accident that MizraBot didn't archive it all together, but please let me know / show diff if you or someone actually collapsed it first.)  So, besides your moving it to the right location, I also think it should be uncollapsed, as it is clearly closed but it needs to be referenced and readable within future discussions.  If you would see your way to doing that, too, i'd appreciate it.  But if you do not agree to do that, on this second point, I would just like to be able to know it is your personal judgment (or whose) that it must be hidden (why?) and to point to that.  It would be simplest of all in future discussions if it could just be pointed to.  (It was all together and MizraBot messed up, right?  This is not my fault nor anyone else's.) 

 Anyhow, please implement the move to the correct location, and I will accept your judgment either way, but hope you could state why, on the second point of uncollapsing.  I am guessing that I should not make these edits myself, but I want to know who is responsible for it being hidden, if someone is deeming that it must be hidden.  I don't think there is anything terrible there that must be hidden.  If you think it must be hidden, please say so.  Maybe also i am overestimating the difficulties that will be caused in the future, but it seems better to be able to provide a wikilink to a specific section in an archive, which I think is now not possible with it collapsed.  Thanks.  "