The way I see it,  basically enforced WP:IDONTLIKEIT making the WP:NPOV meaningless in the content dispute by accepting personal political opinions of some editors versus commonly accepted facts that were cited from published sources by others. Therefore not in any way did she defuse the situation that is also evident at the talk page. if not in the archive, than on the next page. In fact I can take the credit for diffusing the situation, in case you did take a closer look at the case, you should have noticed it.  
 As far as I'm concerned  has therefore clearly shown where her bias stands and that she has a prejudgemental take on the EE subjects and on the editors involved. And that is what Digwuren's case is/was all about. 
 Now, this doesn't mean that I'm trying not change your mind regarding the block. As in fact I don't have any good faith left for  and therefore you shouldn't have any reasons to unblock me.