::Count: Your analysis is quite correct: there is no OR here, and DVdm , Blackburne, and DickLyon habitually use WP:OR or WP:RS as an excuse to malign contributions that they don't want to see included in an article, regardless of pertinence, and without regard for improving contributions or helping contributors. Their reasons for objection, inasmuch as the espoused guidelines are inapplicable, remain obscure.