" 
 ::: Well, gosh, if we can't call a Non-fiction book a non-fiction book this is getting a little harsh.  Can we separate Die4Dixie's politics, which he is kind enough to disclose, from the question of motives (which really doesn't matter if the edit is neutral)?  If you are a library or a bookstore and you are going to shelve this, does it go in fiction or non-fiction?  Paging through a bunch of non-fiction books many omit the categorization entirely in the lead, and many others state the genre, e.g. Military history, autobiography, memoir, etc.  Right now we call it a ""controversial book"" - I think ""book"" is too generic and ""controversial"" in the second sentence to avoid the appearance of article bias.  On the other hand, I'm in no hurry.  Article protection is on for a few more days and we have plenty of time to think about it.  So what does everyone thing.  Replace ""controversial book""?  If so, with what?    "