why a director is able to ruin an adventure of a lifetime
harry potter movies 1 and 2 and 3 are excelent.they cut, obviously, but the story was still a clear, presise message. then along comes a yodelin', rough backin' coyote to change everything the way he sees fit. heres just some of the loose ends left untied.why did neville go nuts by the cruciatus?how did crouch live, escape, attack moody,who killed crouch? where did the house elves go, when is fudge gonna call dumbledore mad? what about rita skeeter? or spew? and theres hardly any snape!at least the actors were good. daniel radcliffe, EMMA WATSON ,and rupert. but the director must think that because they call it harry potter, it cant be about any one else. i quote: 'harry potter and the goblet of fire is about HARRY POTTER, and THE GOBLET OF FIRE. PERIOD!'