Q:

How to measure resistance of a piece of wire?

My son is doing a science experiment on how varying temperature and diameter of wire impacts the resistance. We are assuming we can accomplish this by using different gauge wires, a home thermometer, and a basic digital multimeter (e.g. this one at amazon).
Is this correct, or is the multimeter only used to measure resistance of batteries and circuits and not a plain piece of wire?  If this setup is not sufficient, can you suggest an alternative?
Regarding temperature, will a simple home thermometer (battery, not mercury) be sufficient?

A:

Hmm your experiment sounds like a good idea but I think it'll be much harder than you're imagining.  The resistance of wires is very low.  After all, they are designed to conduct!  Check out this table.  30 gage wire has a resistance of $0.1\: \Omega/\mathrm{ft}$ which is well below what a typical multimeter can read.
Also, because the resistance is so low, one very big source of error will be how well the multimeter probes are attached to the wire.  You'll likely end up measuring the resistance at the point of contact as much as the resistance of the wire.
One way to help though is to measure very long wires.  If you can get wire a few hundred feet long the resistance of the wire will start to be high enough that meaningful measurements can be made, despite experimental error.

A:

As others have noted, the big issue is getting the resistance of the wire into the range where your multimeter can measure it accurately.  For that, the simple approach is to make the wires as long and thin as you can in order to maximize resistance.
That said, another thing you can do is improve the precision of your measurements, e.g. by using four-terminal sensing, a.k.a. Kelvin resistance measurement.  For this, you'll need to pass a current through the wire and measure both the current and the voltage drop across it:

Image source: All About Circuits vol. I, chapter 8.9 
This arrangement allows you to exclude any additional sources of resistance along the current path, such as the contacts between the voltage source terminals and the wire, from the resistance measurement.
Note that, while the circuit shown above includes a separate voltmeter and ammeter, you could also replace the ammeter with a shunt resistor with a known resistance and measure the voltage across it, as in the circuits shown at the bottom of the page linked above.  This would allow you to do the measurement using only a single voltmeter.  As a bonus, the shunt resistor would also serve to limit the current across the circuit.

Warning: Never connect a voltage source, such as a battery or a simple lab power supply, directly across a low-resistance wire.  This will create a short circuit, potentially causing the wire or the power supply to overheat.  Instead, always include an appropriately sized resistor in series with the power supply to keep the current down to a reasonable level.

For an even more accurate resistance measurement, you could set up a bridge circuit, like the basic Wheatstone bridge shown here:

Image source: All About Circuits vol. I, chapter 8.10 
Such circuits can allow very accurate resistance measurements by comparing the resistance to be measured with resistors of known values.  In particular, for measuring low resistances, you might want to look at the Kelvin Double Bridge circuit described further down the linked page.

A:

Wire typically has very low resistance, so what you'll most likely end up measuring is the contact resistance.I.e., the resistance between your multimeter probes and the wire itself might have more resistance than your wire and overshadow it.
My suggestion for the temperature dependent part would be to measure the resistance of the wire with it in boiling water and ice water, for two easy reference points.

