The student's problematic behavior was repeated. It occurred from the seventh to the ninth grade and that was talking back to the teachers, pointing at the teachers, vulgarity, disrespecting the rules and authorities. The student was provocative during the lesson and therefore had physical fights with classmates. We had to report these fights to the police, but his father didn't want that, he wanted us to call him. But we had to call the police to make sure everything was legal. Once in the office I said to him: "Watch your behavior, you know that otherwise I will have to call the police and your dad.
The student suffers from celiac disease, his mother protected him from a young age and made him a poor woman, treating him with alternative treatment. He still had stomach pains and his mother excused him from school. He often deliberately ate what he wasn't allowed to and then vomited. The mother is anxious, always on the father's side. The father was very strict, choleric, a policeman, he wanted his son to be an exemplary student and had disproportionate demands on him. Both parents were always in opposition to the school, they blamed the school, they refused to take their son to specialists. After upgrading the situation, they finally went to the experts - a psychologist, a psychiatrist and a neurologist. It was discovered that he had some kind of neurodegenerative disease and he started taking medication to calm him down. Since then, he was passive at school, falling asleep in class, not carrying assignments, not studying. His father tutored him at home, but he was too impatient.
Physical aggression, Verbal aggression
The management was in contact with the parents throughout the student's studies at the elementary school. But they did not want to cooperate, especially the father did not want to hear that something was wrong with his son. He opposed the recommendations of the special education teacher and the prevention methodologist. There were frequent meetings of the educational committee with parents, the director, and the educational advisor. Parents were always called in case of problems. In acute situations, when a pupil brutally kicked a bottle under the desk, he was excluded from the class and went to calm down in the office under the supervision of a special pedagogue, an educational consultant or a prevention methodologist. It was already running in peace. It was only after this climax that the mother began to cooperate more with the school and they went with him to the aforementioned examinations. The supervision of the pupil increased, there was still some supervision in the classroom. The teachers were informed about the health condition of the pupil.
Interview, Cooperation with experts
Shortly after the incident, the mother took the student away, he did not come to school the next day, then it was the weekend. The whole thing was confirmation from the parents that they had to do something about it. Everything was reported to OSPOD, the police. The parents then completed an examination with their son by specialists. Classmates witnessed the incident, it had an adverse effect on the classroom climate. At school that day, there was an uproar among the female teachers in the first grade. One of them initiated and wrote a petition against the prevention methodology and the student, which they all signed. They were dissatisfied that they were not informed and that they were in danger, as well as the pupils. The day before, the director called a meeting, where he read minute by minute what was happening, who was doing what and who was in charge. He, prevention methodologist and special educator. Everything was as it should be. Then she added that anyone could have called me at any time and inquired about the case, but no one did and they are now writing a petition. Although the student reached the ninth grade, he did not finish elementary school. He got three 5's. Two teachers refused to retest because of the way he behaved.
7.-9. třída, 13-15 let
Happy slapping, toulání se s kamarády, PC hry, později box
Agrese,Lhaní
Mgr. - Anglický jazyk, učitel pro 1. stupeň ZŠ, Metodik prevence rizikového chování žáků ve škole
Problémové chování žáka se opakovalo. Vyskytovalo se od sedmé do deváté třídy a to odmlouváním učitelů, tykání učitelům, vulgarismy, nerespektování pravidel a autorit. Žák byl lekce vyprovokovatelný a proto měl fyzické potyčky se spolužáky. Tyto potyčky jsme museli hlásit na policii, to si ale nepřál jeho otec, chtěl ať voláme jemu. Na policii jsme ale museli volat, aby bylo právně vše v pořádku. Jednou jsem mu v kabinetu řekla: „Dej si pozor na to své chování, víš, že jinak budu muset zavolat na policii i tvému tátovi.
Žák trpí celiakií, matka ho od malička ochraňovala a dělala z něj chudáčka, léčila ho alternativní léčbou. Stále měl bolesti břicha a matka ho omlouvala ze školy. Často naschvál snědl to, co nesměl a pak zvracel. Matka je úzkostná, vždy na straně otce. Otec velmi přísný, cholerik, policista, chtěl mít ze syna vzorného žáka a měl na něj nepřiměřené nároky. Oba rodiče byli vždy v opozici se školou, obviňovali školu, odmítali se synem zajít s odborníkům. Po vygradování situace konečně zašli za odborníky – psychologem, psychiatrem a neurologem. Přišlo se na to, že má nějaké neurodegenerativní onemocnění a začal brát léky na uklidnění. Od té doby byl ve škole pasivní, usínal na hodinách, nenosil úkoly, neučil se. Otec ho doma doučoval, ale byl příliš netrpělivý.
Vedení bylo po celou dobu studia žáka na základní škole v kontaktu s rodiči. Ti ale nechtěli spolupracovat, hlavně otec nechtěl slyšet, že je s jeho synem něco v nepořádku. Stavěl se proti doporučením speciální pedagožky i metodičky prevence. Konaly se často schůzky výchovné komise s rodiči, ředitelem, výchovným poradcem. Při problémech se vždy volalo rodičům. Při akutních situacích, když žák surově kopal do lahve pod lavicí byl vyloučen ze třídy a šel se uklidnit do kabinetu pod dohledem speciální pedagožky, výchovné poradkyně nebo metodičky prevence. To už pobíhalo v poklidu. Až po tomto vyvrcholení začala matka víc se školou spolupracovat a zašli s ním na výše zmíněná vyšetření. Zvýšil se dohled nad žákem, ve třídě byl stále nějaký dozor. Vyučující byli informováni o zdravotním stavu žáka.
Krátce po incidentu si matka odvezla žáka, ten nepřišel další den do školy, pak byl víkend. To celé bylo utvrzení rodičů, že už s tím teda musí něco dělat. Hlásilo se vše na OSPOD, policii. Rodiče teda posléze absolvovali se synem vyšetření u odborníků. Spolužáci byli svědky incidentu, mělo to neblahý účinek na klima ve třídě. Ve škole se to ještě ten den rozkřiklo mezi učitelkami na prvním stupni. Jedna z nich iniciovala a sepsala petici, proti metodičce prevence a žákovi, kterou všechny podepsaly. Byly nespokojené, že nejsou informované a že jim hrozí nebezpečí, žákům také. Ředitel den na to zrána svolal poradu, kde přečetl minutu po minutě co se dělo, kdo co dělal a měl na starost. On, metodik prevence a speciální pedagožka. Vše bylo, jak má. Pak ještě dodala, že mi kdokoliv mohl kdykoliv zavolat a informovat se o případu, jenže to nikdo neudělal a hned píší petici. Žák sice došel až do deváté třídy, ale ZŠ neukončil. Vycházely mu tři 5. Dvě učitelky odmítly přezkoušení, kvůli toho, jak se choval.