I just can’t find a relational logical explanation for morals. Let me give an example:

“Hitler was objectively wrong”

Well let me think. Okay I personally think he was wrong, but wait, why is murder wrong? Okay I understand hurting other people is wrong, but why is that wrong? Oh well it’s causing pain, wait why is that wrong? 99.99% agree hitler was a piece of shit, but what about the .01%? Is objective morality defined by having some threshold of majority? I don’t fucking know, the majority rule is dumb to me, at one point the majority of people thought slavery was okay. 

I also guarantee all the people so sure they have all the answers to what’s morally right rn will be fucking xenophobic bigots 100years from now for their “regressive” views. So wtf what is actually true morally? I just think morals are all opinions and because of this people with BPD are the shitbags of society because our behaviors fall in the minority. If everyone had BPD behavior it would be normal and those who didn’t have it would be the disordered ones. I get it, I cannot act with my BPD behaviors if I want a happy life, but that’s just because of the derision we receive from the majority of society for not fitting their coveted mold of what’s right and wrong. I’m working on it and I will keep working on it. I hate hurting people it makes me feel terrible, but once again that’s a subjective moral, just cause I and most other people hate hurting others that does not make it objective, calling it that is not fair to whatever minority of people believe it is okay to hurt others. Just cause they fall in the minority we cannot discount their opinion. We can make laws that we agree upon as a society, but we can’t start calling morals objective they were invented by humans not discovered by us.