【人才管理】HR進行Performance Management如何做好公正、客觀？
人才盤點
「人才盤點」是戰略人才管理中的一項重要工作，準確掌握企業內部目前的人才狀況 – 從人才的定義、衡量、使用和發展等方面展開基礎工作，將人才盤點以九宮格區分未來的領導接班人。九宮格是最常用於衡量公司當前人才並確定潛在領導者和評核人才的領導力表現（垂直軸）和潛力（水準軸）後，將其繪製在圖表上，右上的綠框人才是為接班的高潛質候選人，而左下的紅框人才則是可能需要重新分配或調整。高潛力員工是企業未來的領導者，對你的組織產生的價值是其他員工的2倍或以上，這樣的員工才可以算是高潛質員工。

利用九宮格區分出來的各類人才如何使用、培養、激勵和挽留？ 並把非常優秀的人才培養成為企業未來的領導者？ 比如右圖上，綠框A1的人才應準備在6個月至一年內擔任高級領導職務； A2、B1或B2人才可根據公司及個人發展時間表作跳升，如他們不懈努力奮鬥，最終可轉移至A1。為了促進人才輩出，直屬經理理應與員工進行每週一對一的會談，從多方面瞭解員工個人發展階段及目標。因此，常溝通非常關鍵，在溝通地過程中，我們建議經理應專注以下談論的內容：

備註：企業在選拔高潛人才的時候，通常會有一個誤區：認為績效與潛質掛鉤，一個高績效的人就一定是個高潛質的人。過往的績效並不能代表未來的潛質。高潛力恰恰是需要體現在未來的崗位上。

進行評估績效 HR須確保決策公正、客觀
在年底前，每個團隊成員都會獲得一個臨時績效等級。這包括將目標以1-5分數模式傳遞；如何配合公司價值觀；這些評估必須盡可能公正客觀。他們需要考慮這一年的6個月中使用收集的所有數據和資料，以及員工的自我評估。

這個清單概述了一些可幫助您確保績效決策公正、客觀的方法：

在進行評估績效過程間，HR需要坦誠地表揚員工值得的評價，亦謹記評級為3表示滿足了期望的良好表現。如果員工沒有實現目標方向，應該降低等級。長遠來看，誠實地為他們提供成功所需的支援是對員工個人最公平的方法。當然，評分應差異化，避免評級3，除非它能真正反映員工績效。

Performance & Potential of your Talent Pool
The 9-box grid is most commonly used in succession planning as a method of evaluating an organization’s current talent and identifying potential leaders. When leadership performance (verticle axis) and potential (horizontal axis) are assessed and plotted on the graph, individuals in the upper right quadrant (green boxes) are identified as high-potential candidates for succession, while those in the lower left quadrant (red boxes) may need to be reassigned or removed from the organization.

The boxes on the grid indicate where investment needs to be made to develop future leaders. Those people in the green box A1 should be ready for top leadership within 6 months to a year; those in boxes A2, B1, or B2 have a longer timeline but can be groomed for eventual movement to box 1. Often times, line managers would have one on one catch up meeting with their staff, hence, we would suggest managers should focus on the followings in your career conversations with successors.

For each team member, you will award an interim performance rating. This will cover

Delivery of objective on a 1-5 scale;

How they are living the values as well

These assessments need to be as fair and objective as possible. They need to take into account the entire six months of the year, using all the data and inputs you have gathered and the employee’s self assessment.

This checklist outlines some of the ways you can help to ensure that the decisions you take on performance are fair and objective.

Where possible, data/numbers are useful – but statistics don’t tell you how an employee lives the values.

Inputs from different people will often give a more balanced view.
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> 你是一個專業的博主。請用繁體中文就指定主題撰寫一篇不少於 400 字的粵語博客。你的博客應該包括引言、正文和結論。 你應該將正文分為幾個段落。您要把博客的內容寫得豐富且有趣。博客內容必須切合打工仔的興趣。如果您不知道指定的主題或沒有足夠的信息來編寫該主題，則應使用指定主題的前十個 Google 搜索結果來編寫它。 <</SYS>> 【人才管理】HR進行Performance Management如何做好公正、客觀？ [/INST] 人才盤點
「人才盤點」是戰略人才管理中的一項重要工作，準確掌握企業內部目前的人才狀況 – 從人才的定義、衡量、使用和發展等方面展開基礎工作，將人才盤點以九宮格區分未來的領導接班人。九宮格是最常用於衡量公司當前人才並確定潛在領導者和評核人才的領導力表現（垂直軸）和潛力（水準軸）後，將其繪製在圖表上，右上的綠框人才是為接班的高潛質候選人，而左下的紅框人才則是可能需要重新分配或調整。高潛力員工是企業未來的領導者，對你的組織產生的價值是其他員工的2倍或以上，這樣的員工才可以算是高潛質員工。

利用九宮格區分出來的各類人才如何使用、培養、激勵和挽留？ 並把非常優秀的人才培養成為企業未來的領導者？ 比如右圖上，綠框A1的人才應準備在6個月至一年內擔任高級領導職務； A2、B1或B2人才可根據公司及個人發展時間表作跳升，如他們不懈努力奮鬥，最終可轉移至A1。為了促進人才輩出，直屬經理理應與員工進行每週一對一的會談，從多方面瞭解員工個人發展階段及目標。因此，常溝通非常關鍵，在溝通地過程中，我們建議經理應專注以下談論的內容：

備註：企業在選拔高潛人才的時候，通常會有一個誤區：認為績效與潛質掛鉤，一個高績效的人就一定是個高潛質的人。過往的績效並不能代表未來的潛質。高潛力恰恰是需要體現在未來的崗位上。

進行評估績效 HR須確保決策公正、客觀
在年底前，每個團隊成員都會獲得一個臨時績效等級。這包括將目標以1-5分數模式傳遞；如何配合公司價值觀；這些評估必須盡可能公正客觀。他們需要考慮這一年的6個月中使用收集的所有數據和資料，以及員工的自我評估。

這個清單概述了一些可幫助您確保績效決策公正、客觀的方法：

在進行評估績效過程間，HR需要坦誠地表揚員工值得的評價，亦謹記評級為3表示滿足了期望的良好表現。如果員工沒有實現目標方向，應該降低等級。長遠來看，誠實地為他們提供成功所需的支援是對員工個人最公平的方法。當然，評分應差異化，避免評級3，除非它能真正反映員工績效。

Performance & Potential of your Talent Pool
The 9-box grid is most commonly used in succession planning as a method of evaluating an organization’s current talent and identifying potential leaders. When leadership performance (verticle axis) and potential (horizontal axis) are assessed and plotted on the graph, individuals in the upper right quadrant (green boxes) are identified as high-potential candidates for succession, while those in the lower left quadrant (red boxes) may need to be reassigned or removed from the organization.

The boxes on the grid indicate where investment needs to be made to develop future leaders. Those people in the green box A1 should be ready for top leadership within 6 months to a year; those in boxes A2, B1, or B2 have a longer timeline but can be groomed for eventual movement to box 1. Often times, line managers would have one on one catch up meeting with their staff, hence, we would suggest managers should focus on the followings in your career conversations with successors.

For each team member, you will award an interim performance rating. This will cover

Delivery of objective on a 1-5 scale;

How they are living the values as well

These assessments need to be as fair and objective as possible. They need to take into account the entire six months of the year, using all the data and inputs you have gathered and the employee’s self assessment.

This checklist outlines some of the ways you can help to ensure that the decisions you take on performance are fair and objective.

Where possible, data/numbers are useful – but statistics don’t tell you how an employee lives the values.

Inputs from different people will often give a more balanced view. </s>