text: Israel challenges the world: I am an Apartheid state, what are you going to do about it? – Middle East Monitor
  Latest News
  / Syria to temporarily close state institutions amid worsening fuel crisis
  / Hamas unveils its new 35th Anniversary logo
  / Saudi Arabia sets January Arab Light prices to Asia, Aramco says
  / US expands visa restriction policy related to Sudan
  / Libya accuses Greece of imposing 'fait accompli' on maritime border
  / Libya urges foreign oil and gas partners to resume exploration and production
  / Turkish opposition MP placed in intensive care after Turkiye Parliament brawl
  / Morocco rewrites history to join usual suspects in hunt for World Cup glory
  / Controversy as Libya's Parliament passes Constitutional Court law
  / Kuwait sets new conditions for accepting Egyptian workers
  / China's Xi arrives in Saudi on 'epoch-making' visit to deepen economic and strategic ties
  / Lebanon: finance minister to postpone enforcement of income tax
  / Libya: MSF rescues 90 migrants at sea
  / Tunisia parties call for protests on 10 December
  / Migrants flee plane forced to land in Spain by fake childbirth emergency
  News
  Opinion
  Reviews
  Features
  Publications
  Multimedia
  More
  / /
  Israel challenges the world: I am an Apartheid state, what are you going to do about it?
  July 23, 2018 at 2:22 pm | Published in: Article, Asia & Americas, Israel, Middle East, Opinion, Palestine, US
  View of a Palestinian refugee camp behind Israel's apartheid wall in east Jerusalem on 3 December 2014 [Muammar Awad/Apaimages]
  Professor Kamel Hawwash
  kamelhawwash
  July 23, 2018 at 2:22 pm
  Remember the date, 19 July 2018 is when Israel's pretense of democracy, the Knesset passed the Nation State Bill, which could more aptly be called, the "Jewish State Apartheid Law" where Jews dominate the Israeli Palestinian Arabs who are lesser than them, even if they are citizens. I deliberately did not say Israeli Jews because the law gives all rights in historic Palestine to Jews, not only in Israel but across the world, including those Jews that do not identify with the state.
  My mother, who was born in Jerusalem before Israel was created, has no rights in the Holy city or her homeland but a Jewish lady with no connection to Israel can "return", to a place she does not come from. The invaders, since they were not invited into our homeland, have enshrined the right to have my Palestinian homeland as theirs in law and also annulled my mother's right to return, which is enshrined not in state but in international law. I can hear cries of "this is the Jewish homeland because we were here thousands of years ago", really? If Jews – and it is only Zionists – believe they are entitled to return after thousands of years -which I reject – then how can they deny Palestinians the right to return after 71 years? In fact UN resolution 194 enshrined in international law gives Palestinians the Right of Return but there is no reference in international law to Jews having a "right to return" to historic Palestine.
  Let me be clear, I am not denying Jewish, Christian or Muslim connection to holy sites in historic Palestine. However, Palestinians reject the notion of singling Jews out for a "right of return" to our homeland now and forever. No other people are afforded the right to a freehold on a plot of land forever and Jews should be no different.
  Read: Israel's president worried apartheid bill will strengthen critics
  Israel's prime minister pushed the adoption of this bill now as he sees an opportunity to make major wins while US President Trump is in office and has given Israel carte blanche to implement any policies it wishes.
  "A hundred and twenty-two years after [the founder of modern Zionism Theodore] Herzl made his vision known, with this law we determined the founding principle of our existence," Benjamin Netanyahu said, adding that this is a "defining moment" for Israel.
  "Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people, and respects the rights of all of its citizens."
  What Netanyahu did not tell us was were exactly are the borders of this state? What rights do its non-Jewish but indigenous Palestinian citizens have within its internationally recognised borders? Netanyahu and supporters of Israel should remember that the 20 per cent "minority" that they form would not have been a minority if it had not been for the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 of their brothers and sisters in 1948. Had they not been forced out through Jewish terror, their numbers would have been equal if not larger than the Jewish Israelis that now reside in historic Palestine. It would have been Jews that formed the minority.
  Netanyahu also failed to explain the status of the occupied Palestinians who are not afforded citizenship in this state. What rights do they have? They are not citizens of Israel or Palestine.
  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Brussels, Belgium on 11 December 2017 [Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu Agency]
  Much has been written since the Nation State Law was approved, but there has been insufficient outrage. The law has mostly been seen at worst as "controversial". Israel has challenged the world to say no to state racism and Apartheid but the world has only expressed concern that the law could impede the now long dead peace process and wait for it, the two-state solution. Netanyahu challenged the world and the world is not ready for a fight for basic equality between citizens of a state.
  Through its silence, the world arguably agrees that historic Palestine is homeland only for Jews. It agrees that the indigenous Palestinians have no rights, except those that the Jewish state agrees to give them out of the goodness of its heart and only if Israeli Jews agree. Jews can build settlements only for Jews and admissions committees can decide whether to allow the people whose land it is, the Palestinians, to live amongst them. They can decide whether Palestinian children can play in kindergartens with Jewish children and whether they can swim together in one pool.
  Read: It's time to admit that Israel is an apartheid state
  By confirming "United Jerusalem" as their eternal capital, Israeli Jews can decide for how long Al-Aqsa Mosque can remain, majestically from a Palestinian point of view, on the "Jewish Jerusalem" skyline. Who can forget the image of the notorious Palestinian hater and so called US Ambassador David Friedman beaming as he held a poster showing a Jewish temple in place of the Dome of the Rock?
  Perhaps the US has already obtained assurances from some Arab and Muslim leaders that since Muslims already have two holy mosques in Makkah and Madina and Jews do not have one, that it would be acceptable to give Al-Haram Al-Sharif up for that purpose. After all it seems protection from the Iranian threat carries a heavy price. The installation of the Jewish temple could be part of the "deal". I of course do not know if that is the case, but we live in bizarre times.
  Israel has already curtailed the calling of the Muslim call for prayer, the Athan, because it disturbs the illegal Jewish settlers. Now, the language in which the call is made, Arabic, has been demoted from an official language of the state to having "a special status". Another attack on the indigenous Palestinians.
  If Israel was not a racist endeavour when created, it is now most certainly a racist state, unless of course a new definition of racism has been created which gives exception to the self-proclaimed Jewish state. A racist state deserves to be criticised, ostracised and isolated until it repents and removes all its racist laws. This law is only one of tens of laws that already discriminate against non-Jews.
  However, what is most bizarre is that confirmation by Israel that it is a racist entity through the passing of the law could, according to the so called IHRA definition of anti-Semitism label as anti-Semites anyone daring to call it a racist or Apartheid entity.
  Labour's anti-Semitism row highlights the hypocrisy of Corbyn's enemies, again
  There is no excuse for the world's lack of action against racist Israel.
  How can the US, the land of the free, support it now? The Zionist and Israel apologist Trump trio of Greenblatt, Kushner and Friedman have not issued any statement on this law. They, especially Greenblatt who is effectively tweeting for Israel, helped Israel with recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital and are working to deny Palestinian refugees their right to return. Their vision for peace almost supports the rapid implementation of the new law rather than condemn it.
  The EU has, true to form, talked the talk but not walked the walk, expressing concern but no condemnation.
  The Palestinian leadership has sleepwalked into this, typically with no strategy to counter it. The appropriate response to the passing of the law in the early hours of the 19th of July should have been for the PLO to declare an end to the disastrous Oslo Accords, to dissolve the Palestinian Authority with an immediate effect including an end to the immoral security coordination with the Apartheid state. The PLO has been mandated to de-recognise Israel by its Palestine National Council. That time has come. How can the Palestinians continue to recognise an Apartheid state which also denies all their rights and then sit with its representatives to negotiate a two-state solution which this law prohibits?
  It is time for the Palestinians to review their struggle and adopt a call for equal rights for all who inhabit historic Palestine and a return for the refugees to their homes. The struggle would continue until these rights are realised.
  #ApartheidState
  All states, but particularly those that claim to be western style democracies, should have severed relations with Apartheid Israel, including those Arab states that have established relations with it.
  As for the rest of those that support Israel both as individuals and organisations, enough is enough. This Israel is not a state that anyone can support or declare a friend. In particular, "friends of Israel" groups in UK political parties should shut themselves down or rename themselves appropriately as "Friends of Apartheid Israel". That is what it should say on the tin. Honourable and Right Honourable members should then resign from these racism-supporting groups and instead join the BDS movement.
  If Apartheid Israel is tolerated, next it will be Apartheid Myanmar and the door will be open for other states to court Apartheid. For the sake of our children let us not allow racism to be tolerated anywhere.
  The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
  Categories
  ArticleAsia & AmericasIsraelMiddle EastOpinionPalestineUS
  Show Comments
  Unless otherwise stated in the article above, this work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. If the image(s) bear our credit, this license also applies to them. What does that mean? For other permissions, please contact us.