text: Alexander (2004) - Page 3 - Stormfront
  11-27-2004, 06:39 AM #21
  Speer's memior book written after the war was majorly edited after he had written it and before it was published. If it says something against the Reich in his book, then it's likely not Speer's words, just some Jewish editor. There are alot of books by Third Reich personalities like this.
  You are probably right about that. It aint much that they don´t stick their big nose into. But about Streicher: He was even imprisoned for a while in the 3rd Reich, because of sexually abusing a young prisoner. And for Röhm also, I feel I´ts beyound any doubt that they were perverts. But thereare sick twisted minds everywhere unfortunately.
  11-28-2004, 09:40 PM #22
  Well there's some time I'll never get back.
  Nothing but homosexual innuendo and non-White mates stuffed between one decent battle and one not as decent battle.
  11-28-2004, 10:04 PM #23
  http://www.whitecivilrights.com/comm...01534629,10506,
  One Hellenic website (Ref. 1) dismisses the accusation that Alexander was homosexual noting "common sense negates allegations about Alexander's homosexuality or drinking habits. It would have been impossible for Alexander to lead his army in such successful military campaigns, achieved by no one preceding or following him, if these attributes were true. Film scripts which attempt to portray Alexander the Great as a homosexual are of poor taste and lack seriousness. Plutarch stated in his Moralia. De Alexandri magni fortuna aut virtute [Morals. About the Virtue or Fortune of Alexander the Great]: 'Let us bring up the deeds of those who have generally been identified as philosophers and let us compare their deeds with the deeds of Alexander. Philoxenus, his coast guard commander, wrote to Alexander that he found in Ionia a very handsome boy, one that could be compared to none other in beauty, and that if Alexander wanted the boy, he could send the youth to him. The king replied to him bitterly and in a scolding fashion: 'Horrible man, have you known me up to now guilty of such crimes? How dare you flatter me with such vile pleasures?' Other points could be brought to disprove Alexander's homosexuality allegations: Alexander was married to Roxane and had an heir by her; he was also married to the daughter of Darius; a queen of the East had asked Alexander to father a child with her."
  11-28-2004, 11:08 PM #24
  Movie-goers are casting their consumer votes and Alexander is not faring well.
  I spent my hard-earned dollars to see The Polar Express and National Treasure. Both were good, wholesome movies.
  The most important vote we have is our collective consumer vote-- let's spend it wisely.
  11-29-2004, 12:22 AM #25
  It was very sad. I also left about an hour and a half into the movie. They pressed the gay thing way too much, and it seemed like that was the movie. The battle scenes were very short, and really not very well shot.
  11-29-2004, 09:15 AM #26
  I´ve seen it now! Well, in my opinion the battles where great but like you say too short. And the fag thing was really dominating. But since half of the world seems to be so "gay" or at least "metrosexual" now, I guess they have a big audience.
  11-29-2004, 11:33 AM #27
  DO NOT SEE ALEXANDER Though I knew the movie would be a crap Jewllywood twist, I went to see it anyways. Partly out of curiosity of how far the Juden would try and twist history. Well, needless to say, they wrung it out like a wet towel and twisted it all over the place.
  The Juden made Alexander out to be a flaming homo, promoted the idea by making the ancient Greeks seem like perverts. They promoted the idea that non-whites created vast, wealthy civilizations ( nothing historical about that anyways) that theiving Whites wanted to covet. They promoted the idea of race mixing and made those who agrued against it out to be drunken fools. The battle scenes were pathetically short.
  I have never got up and walked out of a movie until last night. The movie was that bad. I left half way through. It is not worth renting or wasting nearly 3 hours on if someone rents it for you.
  Haha i never watch Jew Movies in the theathers. Internet always beats paying the jews for their crappy movies. I only watched all Lotr's and Patriot in theator.
  And i also would advice not to watch Exorcist: The Beginning. Same krap their only against Germans this time.
  11-30-2004, 06:56 AM #28
  I was reading a review in the Los Angeles Times on it and it had a photo of "the boys" all standing around in togas with little gentle expressions on their faces. And I thought. What a sick movie.
  Alexander the Great...a boy toy.
  I think it's an attempt to emasculate Colin Farrell by Jew Hollywood.
  Also about male stars in Hollywood: Notice how Jude Law is now "Alfie" the cute harmelss, boyish, nice guy. They sure got on him fast. At least from the billboards I see.
  We have to be constantly aware of how we are being emasculated and de-powered.
  Last edited by Guest; 11-30-2004 at 08:16 AM.
  11-30-2004, 10:57 AM #29
  How' bout some sources that support, this bi theory.
  When I say sources I do mean historians of his time not these new age, jew funded, self-proclaimed, wanna-be researchers.
  Don't you find it at least interesting that while all serious scholars critisized "jew-boy" Stone's film the only fag that jumped out of his closet to support this BS was Gore Vidal, a well known fag?