text: October 2021 – coopgestalt
  Rescuing Robin Hood is a cooperative deck-builder game that came from Kickstarter. It was originally on Kickstarter back in December 2020. It delivered about 3 days ago (Oct 27th, 2021) even though it promised delivery in August 2021, but given the state of shipping today (with COVID inspired delays), 6 months late is not that bad.
  Rescuing Robin Hood is a cooperative deck-builder game for 1-5 players, Ages 10+, and the playing time is 20 minutes per player. I like that the gameplay is measured per person: that feels more realistic than most games: This playtime rating was fairly accurate, if a bit undermeasured.
  Although this is strictly speaking "a deck-building game" (see our Top 10 Cooperative Deckbuilders), this has a different enough feel that it's not just a straight up copy of Dominion or games like that. Rescuing Robin Hood has its own "spin" on the deck-building genre which we'll see below.
  The components for this game are very nice: see above! The art and art-style is all consistent with a "slightly cutesy" vibe (yet not so cute it is distracting).
  The game comes with a letter from the publisher (see upper right of picture) that basically says "Thanks" and suggests that the best way to learn this game is using a you tube video. (SPOILERS! That's how we learned the game! )
  The first thing inside the box is the Character Guide (see above).
  The art is that cutesy art: all the characters (villagers that you recruit) to your deck are described above.
  As cool as this is to see a little "flair", THIS IS 32 PAGE LONG and only describes the characters!!
  We all kind of looked at it for a second, said "neat, but that's too much flavor text" and tossed it back in the box. SPOILERS: I haven't really looked at it since I opened the box. I mean, it's cool, but it feels a little like a waste: no one is ever going to read 32 pages of backstory for the the 80 villagers!
  The rulebook is next (see above). We'll discuss it more below.
  At the top were 2 sheets of cardboard tokens: the tokens are very readable, if not gorgeous. These tokens are nice and big and easy to handle (unlike the tokens in Disney Sidekicks which were so tiny). The big cardboard scene (The Big Oak) is just a place to put Villagers you will recruit ("Go wait for us by the Big Oak Tree"). (Note that I kept the Cardboard Skeletons after punch out to help keep the rulebook flat and the cards "locked" in the box: I do this ALL the time!! See here: A Defense of Keeping Punchout Skeletons)
  The insert is actually quite nice and everything fits in there very well (both pre-game and post-game).
  Each player will have a band of Merry Men, and the "sum" of their stats is kept track of using the tracker boards above.
  Just about everything else in this game is cards: at the end of the day, this is a deck-builder.
  The Villager cards (left side) are what the players decks are made of. The Sheriff's Gards (on the right, in lue and red for medium and hard) and the enemies the Villagers are fighting in the game.
  Each player takes on a "leader" role (like Maude Lindsey, left) and the final villain to fight is the Sheriff (right).
  Depending on the number of players, there are some cards that describe the set-ups: the game balance is definitely achieved in how many guards you fight depending on the number of players on these cards!
  The Villagers are white cards: some them can draw tokens (Thomas Cooper above gets a Scouting token when he is played).
  The game gets harder as you play: note the red guards can have much higher stats (upper left of card) than the easier blue guards! If you look closely, you can also see the linen-finish as well.
  This game also has really nice summary cards (see above). Once we got into the game, we found most of our questions were answered on the summary cards.
  Overall, this games has great components: the art is charming and evocative and consistent. The cards are easy to read and handle. The game looks really nice out of the box!
  This rulebook is good: easy to read and well-organized.
  The first page describes the main objective of the game, and the next page jumps straight to components! Easy to read and get into.
  The next few pages (see above) describe the components and the layout of the cards.
  Then comes the set-up: it has (like many good rulebooks) a description and picture. See above.
  Overall, the rulebook was easy to read, the fonts were large and legible, and the organization was well thought out.
  We liked the ruleboook, but the truth is … we didn't learn the game from the rulebook! We learned it from a video! I did come back and use the rulebook to learn the solo game, but when I needed to look something up in the rulebook, it seemed like it was pretty easy to find.
  Good rulebook.
  Rescuing Robin Hood comes with not one but two solo modes! Gasp! That's right! They follow Saunders' Law! Twice!
  Multi-Band Solo Mode: Pretty typical way to play solo, simply have the solo player play multiple characters (and play normally alternating between characters).
  Single-Band Solo Mode: Only play with one character! You don't reset at the end of days 1 and 3, you preserve Jolly and Brawn between turns, and you "double" your stats in the final challenge (Day 5) to make-up for only having one character.
  Single-Band Solo Mode
  Single-Band Solo Mode: I am only playing one character
  The Single-Band Solo Mode is a nice way to learn a lot of the mechanics of the game. Basically, use all the set-up of a two-player game, but only take one character! Usually, every day has a lot of set-up and tear-down, but the Single Band Solo Mode simply has the single character/band keep the same set-up on days 1 and 2 (and then days 3 and 4). You learn quicker how the deck-building mechanism works in this game, and well as how the combat mechanism (fighting the guards) works, without too much set-up and tear-down. I was excited to have a single character mode …
  .. until I got the end-game. Even though I only have all my stats "doubled" in the end-game, some how they seem to have forgotten that you only have two actions on your turn! In the 2-Player game, you would have 4 actions, which would "barely" be enough to win. I really believe the Single-Band Solo Mode is broken!! It seems almost impossible to win.
  Maybe there is a simple house-rule (the solo player can take 4 actions on the last turn) or something like that, but it almost feels like they didn't really playtest this mode!
  This solo mode put me a in a foul mode: this felt unwinnable. I do believe this mode is broken.
  However, I liked this game enough to give it another try. So, I play in the other solo mode ..
  Multi-Band Solo Mode
  Multi-Band Solo Mode: playing two characters as if a two-player game (but solo)
  The Multi-Band Solo Mode is a much smoother game, but it has a lot of maintenance as you play! Normally, when you play a multiplayer game, each player operates their own character, and helps with the Day to Day Maintenance. Not so here! There are a lot of cards that come out!
  This makes the game "more work" as you play, but the game seems much smoother. The game does seem winnable and more fun.
  Solo Mode Discussion
  The Single-Band Solo Mode is broken without some house rules (the last round has 4 actions instead of 2), so I'd stay away from it. I am not quite sure what the best house rule is for balancing the Single-Band Solo Mode. I really wanted to like the Single-Band Solo Mode, because it's a lot less work to play.
  The Multi-Band Solo Mode is the way to play solo: I just wouldn't play more than 2 characters or the Day-to-Day maintenance may become overwhelming. Even so, the solo player will be doing some work to keep the solo mode going, but it was fun.
  Here's the thing: I think the Single-Band Solo Mode might be the best way to learn the game! Maybe just chop off the fifth day? Or maybe the game could embrace the broken ness! Something like …
  FOR YOUR FIRST PLAY: Have Maid Marion play as a single character using the Single-Band Solo Mode. "Maid Marion thought she could Rescue Robin Hood by herself, she even made it to the end, but when she tried … she realized she needs more compatriots!" Now that you know how to play the game, use the Multi-Band Solo Mode from now on to play!
  This is a very simple deck-builder: you start with 8 Villager cards, and use 4 Villagers on Day 1 and then the other 4 Villagers on Day 2. Similar for Days 3 and 4. And finally, you only use 4 "choice" Villagers on Day 5!!! Depending on how many Villagers you save from the guards (see below), you and your compatriots will choose which villagers to keep and which to cull. In other words, there's an automatic culling procedure built-in to the game.
  To save a Villager, you have to defeat all the guards in front of them: See Above! There are 7 Villagers to save, each with a different number of guards in front. Every Villager you "save" goes to the Big Oak, where they will join your Merry Band on the next day (this is the deck-building part: you are making your deck of Villagers better by recruiting the ones you save).
  Every time you want to defeat some guards, you can use one of three abilities: Wit (blue), Stealth (green) and Brawn(red). Wit (the blue book icon) is a push-your-luck mechanism, where you try to defeat as many guards as you can as long as your Wit is greater than the guards! Above, Amabel and Alice could together defeat the first swordsman (Wit of 4 vs 4), but if they continued to the next guard, they would lose, as the next Swordsman would add 5 more Wit to the guards.
  Stealth (green), is similar to Wit, except you get to choose which guards you want sneak by. (Wit is right-to-left only).
  Brawn (red) is an all-or-nothing mechanism: you turn over ALL guards guarding a Villager and you HAVE to battle them all! (Both Wit and Stealth have some measure of choosing) So, you had better hope your Villagers can take them all!
  There's also "Jolly" which is allows you to "up" your abilities by a a few. Amabel (above) gives 4 Jolly, so even if she spent all 4 to up her Wit she STILL couldn't have defeated the final Swordman (but almost!). Jolly must be spent before the checks are made.
  There are also some tokens to help out the characters: Scout allows players to look at Guards before they fight (to see if they have enough before they fight), The food tokens can be discarded to give +2 to ANY ability (or saved until next round for a +1), and finally prayer can be used to reveal and move Guards around … or two prayer can get rid of ANY guard!
  The game proceeds until Day 5 when you try to Rescue Robin Hood! If you can make it into Nottingham Castle (see above), through the first and second like of guards, then you win! You save Robin Hood! If you are very lucky, you might still have enough energy to take out the Sheriff of Notingham …
  Robin Hood joins you and MAYBE you can take the Sheriff (he increased all your stats by 8). Probably not … I've played a number of times and I have only gotten enough to even try the Sheriff of Nottingham once, and I still couldn't do it.
  My first play was a 4-Player game with on one of my game groups (then I went back and played solo). The intro letter gives a link to a you-tube video that was pretty good for teaching the game!
  We watched the video, paused as we set-up, watched some more, and didn't really need to look at the rulebook at all! I think the Summary Cards and Video were enough to teach the game! I strongly recommend using the video to learn the game! It really worked well, even though we tried a 4-Player game as our first game!
  This game does a very nice job of encouraging cooperative play (mostly)! The fact that the Brawn and Jolly stats will carry on to the next player strongly encourages players to talk and try to figure out how to take out the most guards! The first few players may use Wit and Stealth to take out some guards, saving up the Brawn for a final run against the last rung of guards! It actually seemed fairly thematic as well, because Robin Hood's Merry Men would probably opt for the attack as the final measure! It was fun to talk about how we could use our stats AS A GROUP to take out the most guards.
  The only problem was that we got some analysis paralysis near the end game, and even got grumpy with each other! Although this sharing of all information was very useful, it did lead to some grumpy "analysis paralysis" moments. It was only once or twice, and mostly we had a good time playing. Just be careful of the "analysis paralysis" elephant in the room!
  There were Too Many Cards and Too Much Maintenance! That 4-Player game was overwhelming! There were so many cards on the table (see above), the maintenance was daunting! (We even saw a preview of the "too many cards" problem in the Multi-Band Solo Play) My friend Andrew pointed out that he thinks this game needs to be "cut-in-half": half the cards, half on the statistics! There were just … too many cards.
  We still had fun playing, but we all felt that the number of cards, especially in a 4-Player game, seemed daunting.
  We wonder if they could have tightened up the game (by "cutting it in half") a little.
  Minor Win/Major Win
  Remember, you win if you Rescue Robin Hood! But, as an "optional quest", you can go after the Sheriff of Nottingham! This would have been better phrased as "Rescuing Robin Hood is a minor win, but defeating the Sheriff is a Major Win!" Labelling it as an optional quest seemed… disenchanting. "Oh, we've already won, why do we have to go after him"? I would have preferred the idea of a minor win ("Ah, we saved Robin but didn't get the Sheriff") because it's still a win, but it emphasizes the "we didn't get the bad guy".
  We discussed this Minor Win/Major Win idea on the cooperative mode of Ares Expedition.
  Although this is a "serious" deck-building game with real mechisms, Rescuing Robin Hood does a have a bit of sense of humor. See the cards above? How long before you can figure out the silly phrase for each? I can't tell you how many times we just started giggling as we played. "Why are you laughing? "Get it? Dot Yoreis? Dot Your i's"
  See our Top 10 Cooperative Games With A Sense of Humor for more games with a flair for the funny.
  This game has been in heavy rotation for the past week. Me and my group have a lot of thoughts
  It's perhaps a little too lucky. It would nice if there were just one more mechanism to mitigate luck. Any easy House Rule would be "You can spend Jolly on a 2 to 1 conversion to add to an ability AFTER you have flipped a card!" That way, you can still mitigate a real bad card using Jolly. That would have gone a long ways towards mitigating some of the luck in the game.
  "Too Many Cards": The game seemed balanced and it does work, but Andrew especially just wondered if you could "cut the game in half" (half the stats, half the cards) to make the game have fewer cards and less maintenance.
  The card art is very charming and Teresa especially gave it an extra point because of the art
  There's quite a bit of math as you add up stats as you play. I didn't have a problem with it (nor did my friends), but be aware it could be an issue. You could also look at this as a way to help people sum easily in their head …
  Andrew. 5.5/10 I liked it, I would play it again, but I think there were too many cards
  Sara. 6/10 I liked it and would play it again. The card art really is charming
  Teresa. 6.5/10. I liked it and would play it again. I would even suggest depending on the "mood" I was in, especially if I wanted the cute art
  Me: 7*/10. If you jettison the Single-Band Solo Mode (or make it only the first play), and add a house rule for Jolly to be spent 2-to-1 for post-card flips, it is a 7/10 for me. Otherwise, it's probably a 6 to 6.5
  Rescuing Robin Hood is a charming little deck-builder for 1-5 players. The art and components for the game is very evocative and fun, and the silly Villager names accentuate that fun. If you jettison the Single-Band Solo Mode (or make it the First Play) and add a House Rule to be able to use Jolly in a post-card flip, this game gets a recommendation from me. Without it, the game is a little too random and a little too frustrating, especially with all the cards and maintenance in the game.
  The How to Play video (discussed in the insert and rules) for learning the game was a nice touch, and it really did teach the game well.
  My friends and I had fun playing: hopefully, you know enough about this game to decide if it's right for you or not.
  By coopgestalt October 31, 2021 October 31, 2021 3,083 WordsLeave a comment
  By coopgestalt October 22, 2021 1,916 Words3 Comments
  There's a fairly new breed of board and card games, where an app on a phone or tablet (or sometimes computer) provides content for a physical board game! To be clear, the board or card game is unplayable without the app! Note that this is not the same as playing the game online … the physical boards/cards still sit in front of all the characters around a table!! (See a very different lists here for that: Top 10 Cooperative Games You Can Play Online). This hybrid experience uses an app to augment a physical play of an in-person physical board game. Although some people don't like apps spoiling the "purity" of their board games, apps augmenting games are here to stay. Over the past few years, there have been enough games released that we can can make a list of cooperative games that fit this bill. Today, we take a look here at the Top 10 Cooperative Board and Card Games with an App!
  Honorable Mention: Descent: Legends of the Dark Edition
  So, Descent has a sordid history for me. At the end of the day, I hated the 1st and 2nd Editions of Descent because they were one-vs-many games! One player played the "DungeonMaster" (DM) trying to kill the rest of the players. Here's the thing: I hated that. It reminded me too much of early Dungeons and Dragons games with a vindictive DM trying to kill the players. And that was never fun. And the rules for Descent were too complicated. And because of the one-vs-many nature, you couldn't question rules without creating a hostile environment. I really despised the game. When I heard there was to be a 3rd Edition (well, not a third edition per se, but a new version) that was fully cooperative (where the app took the place of the DM), I was in! Unfortunately, Descent: Legends of the Dark has been very divisive: some people love it, some people hate. it I didn't love it myself, but it's so interesting in a different way, it needs some recognition on this list. Take a look at this review by Tom Vasel of the Dice Tower to see if you might like it: this is a very thorough and well-thought out review which might help you decide if you like it. Another interesting review from the Shut-Up and Sit-Down people paints it in a more negative light.
  10. X-COM: The Board Game
  X-COM The Board Game is probably the oldest game on this list (but see #9): it's an older Fantasy Flight game that you can't seem to really get anymore. This is a cooperative, real-time game about researching tech, protecting locations, and completing missions with your team. The game has a push-your-luck mechanic as you decide how much to roll and re-roll as well. This game was surprisingly fun, given that it was a little bit of a bear to get into. In the game, there are 4 positions which must ALWAYS be populated, which makes it difficult to play at most player counts except for 4. Players "commit" resources during the real-time phase, and then you "resolve" the resources with some dice-rolling (researching, protecting, missioning). Real-time, resolve, repeat.
  The rules are almost all in the app, which we all agreed was not the best decision, as it was sometimes too hard to look up rules. Even though this is a real-time game, we chose NOT to play real-time as the game was more fun if we could just slow it slightly; luckily, the game allows you (in certain modes) to "pause" as you play.
  We didn't love the game but we liked it! It was a bit random (because of the push-your-luck dice mechanic), we didn't love the rulebook but we liked how it walked us through the game. We probably wouldn't play it strictly real-time, but we still had a lot of fun playing. All of those caveats are why it sits at number 10.
  Stop Thief is a game from Restoration Games, resurrecting the old Parker Brothers game from 1979. (Yes, you read that right, 1979!!) The original game was a one-vs-many game, where one player played the thief trying to get away from the other players. The thief moves around the board "in secret" (hidden movement) stealing stuff, and it's up to the other players to try to deduce where the thief is and (as a team) stop him!!! The newest incarnation uses the app to run the thief so the game can be played fully cooperatively (if desired: the original mode is available as well). This hidden movement, press-your-luck game, and deduction works pretty well as a fully cooperative game. The app is kind of cool because it uses sound to give "clues" about how the thief is moving. It's a bit light and it plays in about 20 minutes.
  8. Last Defense
  Last Defense is a light, cooperative real-time game I got at Target for under $20 (I think it was $15 on sale). The app and the game are very colorful. Unfortunately, the app didn't seem to get the margins right on my ipad, so some of the graphics were cut off.
  This was an "end-of-the-night" game: it's simple, only takes 20 minutes (as you explore the board in real-time and gather tools). The app is used mostly for "announcing" where monsters attack the city, but it definitely is thematic and really contributes to the mood of the game.
  Last Defense has some problems (only 2-6 players: no solo mode) and the app could be better (needs updating), but for the price, it's a pretty fun light real-time cooperative game.
  7. Escape Tales
  The Escape Tales games are three separate Escape Room games that use an app to help you you through the adventure(s). Each of the adventures is fairly hefty (about 3 game sessions to play) and kind of dark. The app is necessary, but it generally isn't too splashy: it just helps tell the story. (There were a few cool puzzles here and there in the app itself). The app generally helps you manage the state of your game. We reviewed Escape Tales: Children of Wyrmwoods here and really did like it. Most of the time, you want the app on your iPad (for real estate reasons), but I was able to use just my phone.
  6. A Tale of Pirates
  A Tale of Pirates is a cooperative real-time pirate game that made our Top 10 Cooperative Swashbuckling Games! I had originally gotten this game for my friends Charlie and Allison as a birthday present, and I fell in love with it after playing it!
  The app is fantastic, maybe the best one on this list, as it is easy to run, easy to read, and plays thematic music as you play! The game has amazing table presence (people will stop by and ask "What are You Playing?"). There's also an ongoing adventure for the pirates, which Charlie and Allison have finished because they loved this game so much! Players take timers (this is a cooperative real-time game) and use them to "do things" on the pirate ship (load cannons, get cannonballs, scout, etc) and "new things" unlock as the adventure unfurls.
  5. Rising 5
  Rising 5 was an early review (see here) we did here at Co-op Gestalt: We liked it enough that it made our Top 10 Cooperative Space-Theme Games! This is basically cooperative Mastermind (the old board game) with a beautiful redesign (see the Vincent Dutraite art above and below) and the app is giving clues to you. With the app, you can play solo as well.
  One of the nice things about this game is you CAN play without the app, but then one person has to play the clue-giver (as per original Mastermind).
  4. Mansions of Madness: 2nd Edition
  Mansion of Madness: 2nd Edition has a sordid past with me (which I talk about in my Top 10 Cooperative Fantasy Flight Games as well as my Top Cooperative 10 Creepy/Spooky Games), but we have started playing it every Halloween along with Arkham Horror: 2nd Edition! Mansions of Madness is a cooperative adventure game where players explore an area, with the app guiding them to set-up pieces as they explore.
  The app does a great job of walking you though a spooky scenario, with appropriate music making it even more creepy! (NOTE: Journeys in Middle Earth would probably also be here as well, as Mansions of Madness and Journeys in Middle Earth are two Fantasy Flight app games with a lot of similarities. If you made me choose, which you have, I would choose Mansions of Madness because the theme is so strong).
  In this family of games (essentially all detective games), players use the app on their phone to scan QR codes on cards and locations to study items, investigate locations, question people, and explore the world. It's a simple app mechanism that the Chronicles of Crime family of games has used to very well. This game made our Top 10 Cooperative Detective Games and was quite a hit at RichieCon 2021. The thing is: there's a number of themes, depending on what appeals to you!
  Scotland Yard? Try the original Chronicles of Crime!
  1400 and something like The Name of The Rose? Try the standalone game: 1400: Chronicles of Crime!
  Noir? Try the standalone game 1900: Chronicles of Crime or the Noir expansion (which needs the original game)
  Archie Comics? (I am not kidding here) Try the Welcome to Redview expansion (which needs the original game)
  The future? The standalone game: 2400: Chronicles of Crime is coming out soon!
  Forgotten Waters is a fantastic cooperative storytelling game, where the app helps guide you through a (somewhat silly) Pirate Adventure! The app (well, really a web-site) has voice-acting and sound effects that really escalate the storytelling experience. Rather than reading from a storybook (like older games), all the story is in an App, and it is read to you!!! Players work together as a crew of Pirates searching for Big Whoop! (Or was that Monkey Island II?… Forgotten Waters and the Monkey Island games share a lot of silly pirate DNA). They sail the seas, search islands, and have adventures! Forgotten Waters is so great, it's made numerous lists here: Top 10 Cooperative Swashbuckling Games, Top 10 Cooperative Storybook/Storytelling Games, and Top 10 Cooperative Games With a Sense of Humor!
  1. Unlock! Escape Room Games
  At the time of this writing, there are 27 Unlock Games (see above). These are little escape room games where an app (with some physical cards) guides you through an adventure. The original games came separately with one game per pack (and you can still get some of them that way), but now they come in packs of 3 (with three different games per pack). The reason this game is the number one is because how much the Unlock games have pushed the envelope! In 27 games, they have tried a lot of interesting things in the app! Without any spoilers (because there are 27 games), I have seen: Shaking the app, listening to the app, blowing on the app, tracing on the app, talking to the app, passing the app! The list goes on of all the things you can do in the app! And some of my favorite escape room game experiences have been Unlock games with the app. These games are fun puzzles that you can play solo or with a group!
  We have reviewed a few of the Unlock games here and here.
  By coopgestalt October 16, 2021 1,974 Words3 Comments
  A Review of Backwoods
  Backwoods is a cooperative bag-building, exploration game from Kickstarter back in August, 2020; it promised delivery in July 2021 (about a 1 year later). I received my Kickstarter copy about Sept 20, 2021, so it was a few months late. A few months late for a Kickstarter? That's not bad, especially in today's shipping climate!
  The back of the box (see above) show Backwoods for 1-4 Players, ages 14+ and plays in 1 to 2 hours. My experience with the game make me feel like this info is accurate.
  Backwoods is in a smaller box (smaller than a Ticket To Ride box, abut half the size), but it's pretty full of stuff.
  The most important card in the game is the summary card above: it outlines how the game flows and what the rules are in each phase.
  The rulebook looks like a survival/bird manual.
  Included with the game was this very pretty little "woodsy" card. It didn't really have a purpose (except to be art), but it did set the mood for the game: we are out in the backwoods! I almost feel like it might have made a better cover to the game.
  There are a BUNCH of punchout tokens: most of these are for the grab bag: this is basically a bag-building game; you will build and fill your bag with resources as one of the main mechanisms.
  I have the Deluxe edition which has dual-layer boards. These are really nice and easy to read and use!
  All the boards represent the same info, but there's a different graphic on each board (see above). These boards are used to keep track of abilities and some key stats for each character. This is probably my favorite component in the game: they are linen-finished, dual-layer, and easy to use.
  The rest of the box holds the cards, cubes, dice, and remaining tokens. See above.
  Another main component of the game is the bag itself: see above. This is a bag-building game!! You put the cardboard tokens (to the right in the picture) into the bag: The bag is big and easy to put your hand in to pull stuff out/put stuff in.
  The cards are all very well-marked with their type: see below. (I really appreciate that) They are also all linen-coated! The text is always big and easy to read. See above. I really really appreciate this feature!
  The card art is a bit inconsistent and odd. The regions have a different flavor than the pioneers than the items than the night cards. It's all "kind of" the same theme, but there seems to be an odd inconsistency to the art.
  The cubes (above) are used for the dual-layer Character board. The dice (below) are used for Skill checks.
  The final, pretty nice wood tokens are used to mark Locations.
  In general, the game looks and feels pretty nice. About everything is linen-finished which really adds a nice touch to the initial feeling of quality.
  It looks pretty nice! There's a lot here for a smaller box.
  This rulebook is really not very good. I sometimes rate rulebooks by how many times I yell "Grr!" when reading. This was at least a 5-"Grr!" rulebook. (Roll Camera, by contrast from last week, was a "0-Grr!" rulebook and one of the better rulebooks I've read in a while). I struggled greatly with this rulebook.
  The rulebook looks like it might "bird-hunting" manual (see above) which is quite thematic. And at the end of the day, "most stuff" is somewhere. But, it was a struggle.
  Problem One: What's the theme? What am I doing overall? The first few pages DO NOT DESCRIBE what we are supposed to be doing from a high-level persepctive!! Most rulebooks start with that! The only place I found it was on the back of the box:
  Problem Two: What were some the tokens? Page 2 does show the tokens (see below), but some tokens were no accounted for. (The brown tokens that seem to correlate to some of the animals .. what are they?)
  Problem Three: Where the set-up picture? I expected some sort of set-up picture in the Starting Out, but there wasn't any.
  I did find a set-up picture, again, on the back of the box! … not in the rulebook where most rulebooks show them. (And I didn't find the picture below until my third time playing).
  Problem Four: What am I supposed to be doing? How do I win? Immediately after Set-up, it jumps into the scenarios. And doesn't describe "Freedom Mode" (which is what the "first set-up" is described with).
  Am I supposed to play Just A Scratch first? Freedom Mode (alluded to in the Set-up)? If you look all the way at the VERY END of the rulebook, you find some description of what you need to do to win:
  So, notice that the Freedom mode is described on the LAST page of the rulebook, as well as adjustments for the number of players. Shouldn't that have been all at Set-Up?
  Problem Five: Just poor organization. And not a lot of pictures, if any. I struggled reading anything.
  Overall, you can figure out how to play the game from the rulebook (well, mostly, see below). But this rulebook almost made me toss the game on the scrap pile.
  After playing a few times, I found a "How To Play" set-up on the website. https://mosthighdesign.com/backwoodsgame/resources/
  I wish I had known about that beforehand.
  A picture of set-up (again, on the back of the box) goes a long way towards seeing what the game looks like. Once you see the game set-up, you forgive some of the grumpiness of the rulebook because the dual-layer board and linen-coated cards look nice on the table. For future generations, above is a picture of set-up!
  See a picture of a solo game, a few rounds in.
  Luckily, the game has a solo mode (thank you for following Saunders' Law): they basically just slightly adjusts the abilities for balance.
  Once you FIND the solo rules (on the VEEEEERRY last page), it's a decent way to learn the game. I think you really to need to play the game solo before you present this game to anyone: it's too much to try to learn this in real-time with a group because the rulebook is so bad. I have to admit that I was pretty grumpy with my solo game, but once I presented the game to my friends, it flowed a lot better BECAUSE I had already suffered through the rulebook.
  See a losing game (above).
  After playing the game a few times, I think the solo game is significantly harder than the cooperative game because you can't do quite as much per turn: a solo player will have to take 3 events before he can build three things (as he can only only build once per turn, so three turns have to pass), but a 3-Player game can build 3 times with only one event (in one turn). I think that is a correct assessment of how to play, but again, the rulebook isn't clear.
  The game is all about trying to stay alive while you look for the Fort (at least for the first "Freedom Mode" scenario). Once you make it to the Fort (see below): you win!
  You can go out to a few Locations and can either (a) Scout it or (b) just head in there blind. It's a simple explore mechanism, as you just flip a card (orthogonally) next to you from the Regions deck:
  When you are all done, you have explored a number of Regions which is kind of neat. And each region has very different characteristics.
  By the end of the game, it's kind of a cool little map you've set up. And every region has different explore effects.
  The most important piece in the game is the map above: it gives a VERY nice summary of how the game flows. The little owl marks which "phase" of the game you are in, and a nice summary in on the edges of the card. This card, this card saved this game from the scrap-heap: It's a nice summary that can at least get you in to the game without HAVING to keep your nose in the rulebook.
  At it's core, this is a bag-building game and resource management game. To win, you need to find the Fort (usually), but along the way, you need food and water (and other things) to survive. You can get that food and water from the bag (see opportunity below) or trying other actions in the game (fighting animals, events, etc). For example: If you defeat the "Barred Owls" below in combat, you get 2 Meat (lower left on card).
  You can place items in the bag for 1 opportunity (see lower left of player board) or pull from the bag for 2 opportunity.
  You can also use resources in the game for building items:
  The fire above can be built for 1 WOOD, and it's imperative, especially in the early game, as it allow you to fight hypothermia.
  There are TONS of ITEMS in the game. I didn't realize it until the end of my first solo game, but building items is KEY to winning the game! You can choose ANY item in the deck to build, as long as you have the resources!!
  In the different phases of the game, you explore, build, heal, and fight as you look for the Fort. There are sort of two sets of Bad News cards (this is a cooperative game after all): The Events Cards feel like Choose-Your-Own-Adventure cards, and add an element of "adventure" to the game: The results can be good or bad, depending on what you choose.
  The Night cards, on the other hand, are more like the traditional Bad News cards in cooperative games: something bad happens.
  In general, the game flows through a bunch of days where you explore, build, heal, choose, and end with a Night card. Continue until you've found the Fort!
  One of the elements of the game is religious "Christian faith". It is an optional rule, but the game acknowledges that 1800s in the USA was typically settled by religious (often Christian) settlers. I didn't have a problem with this rule, because it felt thematic: in my USA History classes, it was very clear that a lot of Christian Settlers had come to the US for religious freedom during the early parts of American history. So, I didn't have a problem with it.
  My friends, who tend to me more religious, had more problems with it. They argued that it was perhaps reductive to their faith (reducing Christian religion to just mechanisms with the Faith attribute) and some characters (like the Indian princess character) would probably have a different flavor of faith. So, rather than pigeon-hole the faith as "Christian" mechanism in the game, maybe it should have been handled more generically than the very Christian way it was dealt.
  I don't think anyone was offended, and it didn't get the way of the game, but we all imagined some people might have a problem with the "faith" part of the game. Luckily, the "faith" rules are optional, but you should be aware of them in case it might rub you the wrong way.
  As a game, Backwoods worked better as a cooperative game than a solo game. We all worked together and made decisions about what Items to buy (an essential part of the game). The solo mode is essential for learning the game, but I think you would pull this game out to play it cooperatively more than solo.
  In the end, Backwoods strikes me as a cooperative bag-building version of Paleo! Paleo (a cooperative game that won the 2021 Kennerspiel des Jahres which we reviewed here) is all about managing resources and building the necessary things to survive. Backwoods has a very similar feel to Paleo, but Backwoods uses a bag-building mechanism to help manage resources. If you enjoyed Paleo's resource management and exploration "feel", I suspect Backwoods would be a game you might enjoy.
  Some of the art and graphic design of Backwoods rubbed my friends the wrong way: they seemed to think that the art and graphic design seemed inconsistent (see above). Also, the rulebook definitely needs a major reworking (needing significant re-organization and rewriting), but once you have played the game a few times, however, the rulebook issues are less pronounced. The cooperative game is better than the solo game (as the solo game seems perhaps too difficult), with some interesting decisions made as a group.
  My friends seemed to think that Backwoods needed more development and would give it a 5/10. I liked it more than they did, but I see their point. The game has some really neat ideas and the gameplay does flow pretty well once you get into it, but be aware of the potential issues (art, graphic design, rulebook, faith rules) before you buy: hopefully you can get a good idea of all that from this review.
  By coopgestalt October 9, 2021 2,235 Words1 Comment
  A Review of X-Men: Marvel United. Part I-Unboxing, Solo Rules, and First Impressions
  X-Men: Marvel United is a cooperative super hero game where each player takes the role of an X-Man! Players work together to take down a bad guy! This was a Kickstarter back in May 2021. This essentially the same game as Marvel United (which we reviewed in two parts: Part I here and Part II here), but with characters from the X-Men Marvel universe (instead of the Avengers). To be clear, X-Men: Marvel United is a standalone game which can be played all by itself, but it also expands the original Marvel United.
  My copy arrived October 1st, 2021 (see above). This isn't widely available just yet: as part of the Kickstarter, I could spend an extra $10 to get the base game delivered early. I normally don't like to do the Phase I/Phase II shipping in Kickstarter, but I was very excited to get this!
  By the way, is this X-Men: Marvel United or Marvel United: X-Men? Reading left-to-right on both the front of the box and the back of the box, it looks like X-Men: Marvel United, but the little text above the UPC symbol implies that maybe this is Marvel United: X-Men "formally" inside the system? We'll be calling in X-Men: Marvel United because, you know, left to right.
  There's a little pamphlet with a code, which my phone immediately went to! It went to a web site with some extra content: see here (basically a downloadable achievement book, rulebook, and super villain book). The rulebook is immediately under that (the same size as the box).
  The rulebook has the same art as the cover. As an aside, I didn't originally like the "chibi" style art of the game, but it has really grown on me.
  There are two sheets of cardboards tokens: the ones of the left are mostly actions you can "save" between turns (Punch, Wild, Heroism, Move), while the markers in the right sheet are for thugs/civilians (top), Crisis tokens (middle) and Damage tokens for bad guys (bottom). The card is pretty thick and punched out very easily.
  The game has a very nice insert! There's a little plastic cover that holds down the minis so they stay in place: see above.
  The minis look really nice and are color-coded for your convenience! The blue ones are the heroes, the orange ones are villains (which were RED in the original Marvel United?) are villains, and the purple minis (Magneto and Mystique) can be either a hero or a villain, depending on the scenario! This is very thematic for Magneto and Mystique because sometimes the X-Men would team up with those Villains to "help" the mutant cause!
  This is one of the reasons to get this game! The minis are very nice!! You get Juggernaut and Sabre Tooth (villains), Magneto and Mystique (villains or heroes), and then the X-Men proper: Wolverine, Storm, Cyclops, Professor X, Beast, and Jean Grey (Marvel Girl, but the game calls her Jean Grey).
  These little minis are SOOO thematic and cool looking! See above for some close ups!
  The rest of the game is either little cardboard sheets (with stats) or cards. The cardboard sheets feel a little thin and cheap, but they look good. For example: the Villain Cards:
  Each Villain has a Villain Card which describes their gameplay effects.
  The game contains 8 city Locations in the same thin cardboard (see above) : you get to choose 6 per game that you put in a circle. These are different locations than the original game. The Villain Dashboard is also in this thin cardboard.
  To be fair, the Kickstarter allowed you the opportunity to upgrade some of these thinner components, but some of these base cardboard cards feel a little cheap. I guess this is the price we pay for getting X-Men: Marvel United in the mass market stores! (At least, I think this will be available at Walmart like the original Marvel United …)
  The rest of the game is in the cards: they are NOT linen-finished, but they are otherwise nice and readable and have nice art.
  There are 8 Hero decks: one for each hero!
  Each Villain also has their own deck (see above).
  There are also some cards for a 1 vs many mode (the Super Hero and Super Villain cards), some "Challenge" cards (which make the game harder), and some goals for heroes to move forward (the first three are the same, the Cerebro one is new).
  Overall, the same looks really nice. The lack of linen-finish on the cards and the cheap cardboard boards are a minor criticism of a game that looks and feels very thematic! At the end of the day, those little minis are probably what sell the game!
  This is a fine rulebook. The Intro page has a nice intro with a good table of contents. See below.
  The component page is great! See above! (Everything is easy to correlate and collate).
  The set-up works fine as well (a little texty, but it has some goods pictures).
  I feel like the set-up should have spanned two pages and ONLY been set-up, but in the interest of saving space (and maybe a few more pages), the set-up is condensed a little bit! Again, probably the product of a mass-market game. Note! The winning and losing condition is right up front!!!
  This is a fine rulebook. I didn't really have any major problems.
  The game looks good set-up: See above for a 2-Player (which was actually a 1 player) set-up.
  Wolverine is one of the characters being played: shockingly, he has a lot of attack! The player starts with 3 cards to choose from.
  As the game progresses, players will be putting out their cards in a tableu representing the history of actions: here's a starting tableau after a few turns (notice the villain starts):
  And here's a tableau after a full game!
  The game needs a lot of space available for the little history/tableau, so just be aware and preallocate the space!
  The game follows Saunders' Law and comes with a solo mode, so that's great! Here's the thing: The X-Men: Marvel United solo mode has the same problem as the original Marvel United solo mode: Too much intellectual overhead! The Marvel United solo mode is the canonical example of a game that tries too hard to have a solo mode: see previous discussion here In "How To Play a Cooperative Game Solo?" The essence of the problem is that there are too many exceptions to the main rules (which are fairly straight-forward): see the half page of rules for just the solo mode above! It's very daunting!
  Here's the thing: the solo mode of "let's just play two X-Men and alternate between them like a 2-Player game" works great! It's much simpler, it's easier to get into, and it's just as challenging! (The game above ends with a loss to Magneto). There aren't a half page of exceptions to look up: you just play the game as it's intended with normal rules.
  The game above was SO FUN even though I loss! Play two-handed and ignore the solo rules.
  One of the best elements of the game is how it encourages cooperation between the X-Men: when a character plays a card to the tableau, he plays the symbols on his card, PLUS the symbols used by his compatriot on the previous turn!
  After Wolverine plays, Professor X plays a card in which gets to MOVE and be HEROIC, but also gets the two ATTACKS of Wolverine on his turn! On Wolverine's next turn, he'll get the MOVE and HEROIC …
  In order to win, players absolutely have to work together and discuss which cards to play so they can leverage each other's symbols!
  The game also comes with a special one vs. many mode (which can expand the game from 1-4 players to 5): One player plays one of the villains, with the rest being X-Men heroes trying to take down the Villain! The Villains and Heroes get special cards for this mode: see pictures above and below.
  X-Men: Marvel United continues the trend of Marvel United: it's a fun cooperative superhero game that should have made our Top 10 Cooperative Superhero Games! The only question is: do you like the Avengers or the X-Men better? If you like the Avengers, you should get the original Marvel United. If you like the X-Men, you should be picking up X-Men: Marvel United. They are both stand-alone games and work just fine is isolation.
  Should you get both? Only if you want more content! Arguably, the original Marvel United is a little limited since it only has 3 Villains, so adding X-Men to this adds a lot of content! You get 4 new Villains and 8 new Heroes, which gives you a lot more combinations to try! How would Captain America and Wolverine fare against Mystique? How would Ant-Man and the Beast fare against Ultron? (Wait, wasn't Beast an Avenger AND an X-Man?) All the team-ups you always wanted to try, you can!
  I like Superheroes, and I really like X-Men: Marvel United. Granted, it's a simpler game, but I still enjoy it. My only question now: will X-Men:Marvel United make my Top 10 Cooperative Games of 2021 (see 2020 games here) or my Top 10 Expansions to Cooperative Games for 2021 (see 2020 expansions here)?