text: Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Ambulatory BP in Patients With Sleep Apnea and Hypertension*: A Placebo-Controlled Trial | CHEST Journal | CHEST Publications
  Francisco Campos-Rodriguez, MD; Antonio Grilo-Reina, MD; Jose Perez-Ronchel, MD; Mercedes Merino-Sanchez, MD; Maria A. Gonzalez-Benitez, MD; Manuel Beltran-Robles, MD; Carmen Almeida-Gonzalez, MD
  *From the Departments of Respiratory Medicine (Drs. Campos-Rodriguez, Perez-Ronchel, and Merino-Sanchez), Internal Medicine (Drs. Grilo-Reina, Gonzalez-Benitez, and Beltran-Robles), and Statistical Analysis (Dr. Almeida-Gonzalez), Valme University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.Correspondence to: Francisco Campos-Rodriguez, MD, Avda. Emilio Lemos N° 19, Portal 2, 4-E., 41020 Sevilla, Spain; e-mail: fcamposr@telefonica.net
  Background: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is an independent risk factor for arterial hypertension. Several controlled trials have investigated the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on BP in patients with OSAS, but its effect on hypertensive patients has not been analyzed specifically.Objective: To analyze the effect of CPAP on ambulatory BP in patients with OSAS and hypertension who were undergoing antihypertensive treatment.Design and patients: We conducted a parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 68 patients with OSAS and hypertension, who were receiving treatment with antihypertensive medication. Patients were randomly allocated to either therapeutic or subtherapeutic CPAP for 4 weeks. Ambulatory BP was registered at baseline and after treatment. Antihypertensive treatment was not changed during the study. Changes in BP were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis.Results: There were no baseline differences in the apnea-hypopnea index, comorbidities, or ambulatory BP between groups. Objective compliance with CPAP was similar in both the therapeutic and subtherapeutic groups (5.0 ± 1.4 h/d vs 4.4 ± 1.9 h/d, respectively; p = 0.13 [mean ± SD]). There was a small and statistically nonsignificant decrease (− 0.3 ± 6.3 mm Hg vs − 1.1 ± 7.9 mm Hg; difference, − 0.8 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, − 2.7 to 4.3]; p = 0.65) in 24-h mean BP (24hMBP) in both subtherapeutic and therapeutic groups after 4 weeks of treatment. No significant changes in systolic, diastolic, daytime, or nighttime BP were observed. The normal circadian dipper pattern was restored in a higher proportion of patients in the therapeutic group compared to the subtherapeutic CPAP group, although differences were not significant (11 of 32 patients vs 3 of 25 patients; odds ratio, 3.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 20.30; p = 0.10). There was no correlation between the magnitude of change in 24hMBP and CPAP compliance, OSAS severity, or number of antihypertensive drugs used.Conclusion: Four weeks of CPAP did not reduce BP in patients with OSAS and hypertension who were treated with antihypertensive medication, compared to placebo group.
  Return to: Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Ambulatory BP in Patients With Sleep Apnea and Hypertension*: A Placebo-Controlled Trial
  Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on ambulatory bp in patients with sleep apnea and hypertension*: a placebo-controlled trialCampos-Rodriguez F, Grilo-Reina A, Perez-Ronchel J, et al. Chest. 2006;129(6):1459-1467. Download citation file: RIS (Zotero) EndNote BibTex Medlars ProCite RefWorks Reference Manager Copyright © American College of Chest Physicians
  Blood pressure effects of CPAP in nonresistant and resistant hypertension associated with OSA: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.