text: SC sets aside HC order for attaching Future, Biyani assets - IPA Newspack
  SC sets aside HC order for attaching Future, Biyani assets
  In a relief for Kishore Biyani-led Future Group, the Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside Delhi High Court order declining stay on an arbitration tribunal decision refusing to interfere with the Emergency Award (EA) of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in favour of Amazon. The top court said the HC needs to consider all issues and pass appropriate orders and remands the issues back to the court.
  Meanwhile, Future Group is on interim Relief. The writ petition 48/22 was filed after the order was reserved. The petition will be heard in due course. The four petitions before the Supreme Court have been filed by Future Coupons Private Ltd (FCPL) and Future Retail Ltd (FRL).
  The bench, on January 11, had reserved the judgement and had said that it wanted to send the case back to the Delhi High Court to render a finding on the enforceability of the SIAC award restraining FRL's sale of assets to Reliance Retail. The apex court has reserved its order on two sets of petitions filed by FCPL (Future Coupons Private Ltd ) and FRL (Future Retail Ltd).
  The second set of appeals has been filed against the Delhi High Court's recent order declining its plea for stay on an arbitration tribunal decision refusing to interfere with the SIAC's EA, which restrained it from going ahead with the Rs 24,731 crore merger deal with Reliance Retail.
  During the hearing on January 11, senior advocates Harish Salve and Mukul Rohatgi had appeared for FRL and FCPL respectively and the U.S. e-commerce major, Amazon, was represented by senior lawyers Gopal Subramanium and Ranjit Kumar, and others.
  Salve had said for the merger deal to go ahead the adverse orders passed last year on February 2 and March 18 have to be quashed. The US firm, which has invested in FCPL, has been opposing the deal. The FRL and FCPL had said that they are allowed to go forward with the interlocutory proceedings of the scheme with Reliance to ensure that they would be able to finalise the deal once the dispute with Amazon is concluded.
  The SIAC, in the EA, had granted relief to U.S. e-commerce major Amazon by restraining the Future from going ahead with the Rs 24,731 crore merger deal of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) with Reliance Retail. Amazon had dragged Future Group to arbitration at SIAC in October last year, arguing that FRL had violated their contract by entering into the deal with rival Reliance Retail.
  On October 21 last year, a duly-constituted panel of arbitrators at the SIAC reiterated the EA's decision. On October 29, 2021, the Delhi High Court declined Future Group's plea for a stay on the arbitration tribunal. The high court sought a response from Amazon which had challenged the merger before the SIAC and listed the appeals by FCPL and FRL for further hearing on January 4, 2022.
  The FRL and FCPL had moved the top court against the high court order of August 17, 2021, which said that it would implement the earlier order by its single-judge restraining FRL from going ahead with the deal in pursuance of the EA's award.
  The apex court had also set aside the two orders of February 8 and March 22, 2021, of the division bench of the Delhi High Court order which had lifted the single judge's orders staying the FRL-RRL merger.
  A bench headed by Justice R.F. Nariman, since retired, had dealt with the larger question and held that an award of an EA of a foreign country is enforceable under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act.