text: Hide the close reason - Meta Stack Overflow
  discussion feature-request close-reasons share|improve this question asked Jan 21 '10 at 13:57
  3 In that case you need to have a check box, not a radio, for cases where a post commits multiple crimes.
  11 Just FYI, if you see something that was closed for an obviously wrong reason you can flag it for moderator attention. It only takes us a few seconds to temporarily reopen it and close it for the right reason. (Make sure you tell us the right reason when you flag.)
  meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/111402/… I think this discussion better addresses the issue.
  @Æther, was that intentional?
  share|improve this answer answered Jan 21 '10 at 14:02
  +1 - Don't start coding for special cases until you've quantified them.
  share|improve this answer answered Jan 21 '10 at 14:03
  Not equal chance, it's closed as the first one selected based on my experience
  The ones on my list aren't chronological. It could have been 1 person voting for Blatantly offensive, one person voting for ED, one for NPR, a second for NPR, and then a second for BO.
  And yes, that's the problem I see (your last paragraph)
  Hopefully the OP is paying attention to the question in the first 5 minutes, and would therefore find the close reasons without additional work by the system.
  @Pollyanna - that assumes that the closers have left comments. Not necessarily saying they have voted to close, but say why they have. e.g. "Question is subjective and argumentative" or "Belongs on Super User".