text: I was fortunate to see an advance screening of this documentary last evening at the Texas Theatre in Dallas. It is well written, as well as skillfully directed, and the featured experts (Doug Horne, Sherry Fiester, Vince Palamara, Dick Russell et al.) were evidence-based and concise with their comments.
  The film has very good production values, including an acclaimed narrator (Peter Coyote), so I am hoping it will obtain a suitable distributor and a broad viewership. It is unrealistic to think it will have the same impact as a Hollywood blockbuster such as Oliver Stone’s “JFK,” but as with that movie it has the potential to open many people’s minds to all the new information we have learned in the succeeding decades after this tragic event.
  I watched the trailer just now. Yes looks like high production values. I think Sherry Fiester’s contribution is critically important.
  I do have a dissenting view of Doug Horne’s input however, and if one compares the ballistic analysis of Fiester with the tale Horne tells there is conflict between their views. The autopsy X-rays and photos in fact are what Fiester’s analysis of the single high powered bullet would produce.
  The main thing however is Horne’s position that the Zapruder film is faked. It is simply impossible to fake a Kodachrome II daylight film using any projection system. The chemical dye structures only react properly in daylight. Any and all projector systems use artificial light as a practical necessity.
  The “in camera original” taken by Zapruder and in the National Archives is on Kodachrome II film, thus it is the authentic uncut version shot on November 22, 1963 during the assassination of JFK.
  Cui Bono? Who most benefits from erasing the best visual evidence of the assassination? It is obvious, the perpetrators would benefit most.
  Just got an email stating that the movie will be available to stream and for purchase on Blu Ray in November. More details will be emailed to me in two weeks.
  I believe it is possible to re-make, or fake imagery on Kodachrome II. I am not an expert nor particularly knowledgeable in this field. But I watched the interview with Dino Brugioni, who was the number 2 imagery and film analyst at NPIC, the National Photographic Interpretation Center, who implied that it could be done. He referenced the work done at Eastman Kodak, Rochester Office. I suggest one watch that interview before drawing any final conclusions.