text: Earlier this year BPAS, the charity who well and truly have your back on all things contraceptive, asked a question.
  After quite a lot to-ing and fro-ing, various outlets such at Superdrug committed to reducing the price of the morning after pill. But Boots, one of the country’s biggest health retailers didn’t.
  They released a statement about how the price was part of an attempt to discourage irresponsible usage. Unsurprisingly, women weren’t wild about this. In fact they felt it was pretty patronising.
  We explored all the essential reasons that women need to have access to affordable contraception at the time, and when Boots finally committed to sorting this out, we were relieved.
  ‘In August, they announced that they were already “trialling” a cheaper product in 38 of their stores and committed to this being available in all stores by the end of October.
  ‘Exactly two months later, there appears to have been no further roll out of this promised service. We simply cannot understand how a company of this size is incapable of providing an affordable product when so many of their smaller competitors have already done so.
  ‘Boots has failed to live up to its commitment and continues to take advantage of women in difficult circumstances. We imagine Boots’ customers, who made their feelings on this issue explicitly clear over the summer, will feel let down by the fact that the company has reneged on their undertaking to provide a more affordable service to women in need.’
  ‘We are currently offering an extended over-the-counter Emergency Hormonal Contraception (EHC) service which includes the generic levonorgestrel in 38 stores in the East Midlands. We are working closely with the supplier to increase supply into the UK; but unfortunately they have experienced a slight delay in their supply chain. We anticipate a full roll out within the next month.
  ‘We’re sorry for this slight delay and we remain committed to increasing accessibility of EHC for women, and we firmly believe in the right of all women to access these services with ease and convenience.’
  It would be far from the most ridiculous go fund me cause. Although to keep it on the DL it should be called "We need $100,000 for Ashanray Arygay to go to Ichiganmay". That would definitely keep the NCAA away
  These kinds of organic cheers are much more doable when you don't have RAWK drowning out everything in its wake.
  My raccoon also has hepatitis, have you read the trends. If you carefully read the limited research it may be an epidemic similar to the coon flu of 1993 which contrary to popular belief was not caused by returning GI's.
  Yes, because fans can definitely go win the game, and/or OP is asking the team itself to chant for a recruit...
  an excuse I've come to respect, with a brand new Welsh Terrier puppy to deal with, I think that giving Rashan special recognition would rate high with Mom.
  B) I only cheer for the guys who want to be here, not the guys "thinking about it" or "mulling it over" and particularly not for the guys who by most predictions won't even come here. How stupid would you feel if the whole stadium chants it, and he picks Bama?
  I think people's criticisms of this - though I admit I'm having to imagine most of them - are based in either over-thinking things or being too cool for school.
  Do you check this blog 50 times a day and follow recruting? Then you are not too cool to chant Rashan Gary's name. It just shows him he's wanted. No one will be corrupted by this. Jim Harbaugh would like it.
  and since I only check this blog 49 times a day and don't follow recruiting at all (aside from this blog's synopses), I will compromise and chant his name from my couch tomorrow...but only if/when he appears on camera
  i really doubt he would think this is a good idea. a seventeen year old kid that nobody has probably ever met or talked to, and you are going to chant for him? really weird.
  Well, if Sam Webb thinks it's a good idea then by a means, we should all do exactly as he says (this is /s).
  Its not for me though. He knows we want him, pretty much all teams do, he can go where he wants. As a 35+ year old, I refuse to chant the name of an 18 year old who isn't on the team and very well may never be. It sounds astoundingly ridiculous to me. But that's my opinion.
  I agree 100%. I'm good. The atmosphere in and of itself will be enough to lure him in if he wants to come. Especially if we get the dub. Whoever wants to chant the kid's name...be my guest but as for me? I'm good.
  You do realize fans started a Mitch McGary chant while he was visiting right? Boy that turned out bad... Set that entitlement aside until we aren't 1-6 and 1-9 vs MSU and OSU.
  It worked for McGary, it's got to be fun for the recruits, it should be fun for the fans, what's not to love?
  Some of the attitude in this thread is mind-boggling. You won't cheer for an 18-year-old because you're in your 30s? That's a Dave Brandon move.
  That...has nothing to do with Dave Brandon. At all. DB was writing thinly veiled love letters to Jabrill when he was afraid he'd decommit for christsakes.
  No man is more important than The Team. No coach is more important than The Team. The Team, The Team, The Team
  I don't think there is anything wrong about making a recruit feel welcome and wanted. They call it recruiting for a reason.