text: The Boston Early Music Festival’s 26th-concert series opened last night at First Lutheran Church, Cambridge with a beautifully conceived and executed recital by soprano Emma Kirkby and lutenist Jakob Lindberg. The duo, who last performed for BEMF four years ago at the First Church in Cambridge, returned to that venue for a program of mostly 17th-century music by mostly English composers.
  “The Golden Age Revived,” referred to the retrospective glances toward classical antiquity made in the poetry set to music on the program. Seven sets of selections presented seven themes, laid out by the singer in her program notes: “Creation,” “Metamorphosis,” “Heroines,” “Lyric Poets,” “Love, Death, and Fate,” “The Death of Dido,” and “Venus and Cupid.” All reflected the broader theme of nostalgia for an “earlier, purer, and more beautiful time” such as one also finds depicted in paintings of the period by Poussin and Claude Lorrain.
  But the formal classicism of Poussin’s idealized scenes is absent from the more openly emotional though no less learned poetry of many of these songs. The latter included verses by the ancient lyric poet Anacreon, one of them in the original Ionic Greek, two others in the Latin of his Roman successors Virgil and Horace. The mostly anonymous English poems of the other selections reflected their authors’—and their original audiences’—familiarity with ancient literature as well as their fascination and identification with the mythological stories and characters that are their subjects. Intermingled with the fifteen vocal selections were four sets of contemporaneous lute solos.
  This music stands on the cusp of what we call the late Renaissance and the earlier Baroque. But it has little to do stylistically with either the polyphonic motets and madrigals beloved of choral groups or the familiar cantatas, operas, and instrumental music of the Italian and French Baroque. English composers of the period famously kept to their own style, which, although sometimes abstruse, rewards sensitive performance and careful listening. Some of these selections reflected their composers’ awareness of contemporary developments on the Continents; others retained the typically English predilection for asymmetrical phrases and irregular, counter-intuitive melodic lines. These create interpretive difficulties for lesser performers, but Kirkby and Lindberg negotiated them with clarity and precision as well as freedom. Occasional bursts of florid melodic embellishment, which can drive conventionally trained performers to distraction, were executed by both as if effortlessly, with the seeming nonchalance or sprezzatura demanded by writers and audiences of the period.
  Kirkby, who knows this repertory as well as anyone—she has been singing it for decades, and writes her own translations and commentaries—remains among the greatest living singers. Lindberg is equally a virtuoso of his instrument, always a sensitive and deferential accompanist, but also so brilliant a solo player that one audience member, during a post-concert “discussion,” was moved to ask how many fingers he has. As in her previous BEMF performance, Kirkby sat to Lindberg’s left, rising for the more dramatic selections, which were performed with vivid yet precise historical gestures and expressions. (The singer afterwards mentioned having studied Baroque stage gesture with Dene Barnett, author of what remains the standard text on the subject.)
  Practically every selection on the program was a revelation of one sort or another. To these ears the shorter and simpler Elizabethan or Jacobean lute songs early in the program were particularly affecting. These began with Alfonso Ferrabosco’s “So Beauty on the waters stood,” a quiet evocation of the creation of the world from chaos. Songs about Daphne and Apollo followed, proceeding from the lovely “When Daphne fair” by an anonymous arranger to increasingly subtle settings by John Danyel and John Dowland.
  Particularly intriguing were two pairs of works on parallel texts. Anacreon’s famous self-deprecating salutation to his lyre was heard first in a rare setting of the original Greek by the Cavalier composer Henry Lawes, then in the same composer’s completely different composition of the “Englished” text. The former was notable for particularly exquisite vocal decorations or “divisions,” some of them added by Kirkby. In the latter (originally for bass voice) the performers focused more on wit, reflecting the poem’s and the composer’s harping on “love, love, love.”
  If that pair of pieces was characterized by their difference from one another, songs about Cupid by Pelham Humfrey and Henry Purcell were variations on a common template. Kirkby even employed the same theatrical gestures in both. But the performances rather proved her observation that Purcell evidently meant to outdo his predecessor, writing a more vivid and at the same time more witty setting of an amusing tale. I wonder, however, whether a performance emphasizing the differences between the two compositions might not have brought out something distinct in the earlier, more florid setting.
  Somewhat larger works formed centerpieces and finales for each of the program’s two halves. The lengthy monologue “Hero and Leander” by the Jacobean composer (and painter) Nicholas Lanier might better be called “Hero’s Lament.” Its individual verses were performed with moving theatricality. Yet the discovery of Leander’s body at the very end occurred too suddenly, leaving the piece less effective than comparable soliloquies in Italian operas on which it was based, such as Monteverdi’s famous Lament of Arianna (which it seems to quote).
  It was nevertheless a gift to hear this, as also “La Parca” by the little-known Neapolitan composer Cataldo Amodei. Published in 1685, the joyless Italian text of the latter—“if life is a flower, its fruit is death”—depicts Atrophis, oldest of the Three Fates. Amodei’s cantata echoes earlier vocal writing by Cavalli and Barbara Strozzi, but it also anticipates that of Alessandro Scarlatti, occasionally blossoming into a later type of coloratura. If neither as bleak nor as instructive as the composer must have meant it to be, this unfamiliar music by a lesser figure was certainly worth hearing.
  The same goes for two substantial works by Purcell’s older contemporary John Blow which closed each half. “If mighty wealth,” based on another Anacreon text, was presented wittily, its contrasting sections clearly delineated. “O Venus, daughter of the mighty Jove,” setting an English paraphrase of Sappho’s “Hymn to Aphrodite,” is, on the other hand, a serious, almost operatic scena.
  The poet, from the Greek island of Lesbos, was not yet understood at the time as a lesbian in the modern sense, but simply as a devotee of the goddess of love. Blow’s music depicts the grand arrival of Venus in her flying chariot, like a deus ex machina in the Baroque theater. Lindberg admitted, in later remarks, that the “quite busy” accompaniment, conceived for harpsichord, is almost “beyond possibility” of playing on the lute. I’m afraid that this performance was indeed less than grand, in part because here, as through most of the program, Kirkby sang in a close, “indoor” sort of voice. This suited performance with a lute, but it could not fully project the grandeur of Blow’s scene.
  Still, only the performances of the two earliest works on the program, by William Byrd and Alonso Mudarra, might be counted as less than successful. Byrd’s “Constant Penelope” was originally a consort song for voice accompanied by four viola da gambas. Lindberg’s reduction of the latter to a single lute part sounded muddled in the difficult acoustic of First Church. Byrd’s not so obviously expressive vocal part was slighly rushed, and its unusual English hexameter verse (pointed out by Kirkby in her notes) was presented without much distinctive character. The latter must be said also of Mudarra’s austere setting of “Dulces exuviae,” the original Dido’s lament (from Virgil’s Aeneid), taken from a 1546 Spanish publication.
  It is possible that these two selections, as well as John Wilson’s setting of Horace’s ode “Diffugere nives,” might reveal more through simple repetition. Each surely contains subtleties that are hard to catch on first hearing, no matter how well performed. On the other hand, Purcell’s “Music for a while,” sung as an encore, was composed for the theater and communicates something in almost any performance; this one made an eloquent conclusion to the evening’s music.
  I have saved the lute solos for last, although they were an integral part of the program. Most, including pieces by Purcell and a suite from the Royal Consort by William Lawes (younger brother of Henry), were Lindberg’s own arrangements of music originally for other instruments. I was most impressed by an intricately contrapuntal toccata by Giovanni Kapsperger. This was followed by a long ciaccona by Alessandro Piccinini, which incorporates a number of formulas also found in the somewhat more familiar keyboard pieces of this type. I was sorry that neither performer mentioned that Piccinini, who claimed to have invented the archlute, shared the classical aspirations of the song-writers on the program. His chitarrone, a related instrument, was said to have “resembled Apollo’s lyre.” Lindberg played neither of these instruments but rather a beautiful new twelve-course theorbo-lute by Michael Lowe; this seemed a perfect choice for the varied repertory.
  I’d like to close briefly on a somewhat more personal note. Reviewers, including this one, often have reason to lament unimaginative programming by presenters who repeatedly offer up crowd pleasers performed by a few favored musicians. But no one could rightly complain about a recital as thoughtfully planned and beautifully given as this one. BEMF is to be thanked for bringing, again, two of the best living performers of this, or any, music to Cambridge.
  The attorneys at Gibbs Law Group are investigating reports of employment law violations at Amazon involving warehouse employees, delivery drivers, and other workers, including those designated as contractors by Amazon. According to recent news articles, despite Amazon’s reported $15/hour raise, many workers continue to experience employment law violations such as misclassification as independent contractors, missed meal and rest breaks, lack of overtime pay, and other related issues.
  Amazon workers who aren’t paid properly or denied humane working conditions may be entitled to labor code penalties. Contact us for a free consultation with no obligation.
  According to a New York Times report, some Amazon warehouse workers have discovered that they may end up making thousands of dollars less a year after the implementation of the “new Amazon minimum wage of $15 an hour.” Reportedly, while Amazon will increase wages for most employees, it will no longer give out new stock grants and monthly bonuses, such that the total compensation for some workers will shrink. Senator Bernie Sanders has requested that Amazon confirm how the total compensation of employees who formerly received these forms of compensation will change.
  Per the New York Times article, Amazon will be ending its monthly attendance and productivity bonuses, known as the Variable Compensation Plan. The plan offered up to a 4 percent bonus for attendance and an additional 4 percent if a worker’s building met certain production goals. Additionally, in the three months around the holidays (known as “double down”), the bonus doubled, meaning that employees could earn up to 16 percent on top of their regular wages.
  Business Insider reports that Amazon delivery drivers have experienced a variety of alleged abuses “including lack of overtime pay, missing wages, intimidation, and favoritism.” Given the strict time constraints that delivery drivers operate under, drivers “felt pressured to drive at dangerously high speeds, blow stop signs, and skip meal and bathroom breaks.” Several drivers also reported that they were denied overtime pay, despite working well over 40 hours a week. One driver stated: “Amazon is doing whatever they want . . . [a]nd we’re paying the price.”
  According to Business Insider, Amazon drivers at many subcontractors also reported feeling powerless to report violations because they feared retribution, such as termination, withholding of wages, and denial of work. For example, one logistics company named Prime EFS reportedly sent its drivers a text stating “[a]ny callouts I will make sure you do not receive a route for a week.” Another driver for a different courier company reported being sent home on a scheduled workday for being one minute late. One former Prime EFS manager said that if someone didn’t show up to work, the company “wouldn’t pay him for a week.”
  Many drivers also reported problems with their paychecks per the Business Insider article. Drivers report managers who “would frequently forget to pay overtime or fail to add a new driver to the system so that the person wouldn’t receive a paycheck.” According to one manager, a Texas-based courier company didn’t pay overtime for at least a year.
  Due to package delivery quotas, workers report fearing to take meal and rest breaks as well. According to one courier manager in New Jersey, “[d]rivers have to pee in bottles in their vans all the time.” One driver at JARS TD said that drivers “brought buckets and baby wipes to work so they could relieve themselves inside their trucks.” Another driver reported finding bottles of urine in delivery vans as well as at the Amazon facilities where he loads packages.
  Amazon drivers report feeling the pressure to meet these quotas because Amazon tracks them and might call their supervisors if something looks off. Using handheld package scanners called “rabbits,” Amazon updates customers on order’s location. According to the Business Insider article, Amazon may call dispatchers and ask why certain drivers are behind their package quota for the day. While Amazon reportedly claims that most drivers’ shifts are completed in nine hours or less, Business Insider reports that an analysis of actual payroll data shows that drivers at one company worked over 11 hours on average. One Amazon-affiliated job listing recently advertised that drivers typically work 12-15 hours straight.
  Speak to an employment attorney to learn more about your rights. Call, or fill out the form for a free consultation.
  Many thousands of Amazon delivery drivers are reportedly employed by third-party companies, called delivery service partners. But while these drivers are not directly on Amazon’s payroll, the company reportedly “retains power over nearly every other aspects of these drivers’ jobs,” according to Business Insider. Drivers’ daily delivery routes and deadlines are reportedly set by Amazon and Amazon trains many of the drivers, provides them with on-the-road support and gives them devices called “rabbits” for package scanning and route navigation.” According to Business Insider, Amazon will begin to require its delivery service partners to electronically track and record employees’ hours using software provided by payroll company ADP. Amazon claims that it regularly audits its delivery service partners and requires them to abide by employment laws. Amazon managers also described having the power to “indirectly fire” drivers by barring them from their delivery stations.
  Because these drivers are not on Amazon’s payroll, they are reportedly not subject to the $15/hour minimum wage policy that workers directly employed by Amazon will receive.
  Gibbs Law Group has been recognized a Tier-1 law firm by U.S. News – Best Lawyersconsecutively since 2013, and founders Daniel Girard and Eric Gibbs have been named among the Best Lawyers in America consecutively since 2012.
  Gibbs Law Group is a national litigation firm representing plaintiffs in class and collective actions in state and federal courts, and in arbitration matters worldwide. The firm serves clients in securities and financial fraud, antitrust, consumer protection, whistleblower, personal injury, and employment cases. We are committed to achieving favorable results for all of our clients in the most expeditious and economical manner possible.
  As a result, our attorneys are frequently recognized by the courts, our peers, and the legal media for their ability to provide the highest caliber of legal service. Our attorneys take pride in their ability to simplify complex issues; willingness to pursue narrow and innovative legal theories; ability to work cooperatively with other plaintiffs’ firms; and desire to outwork and outlast well-funded defense teams. Eric Gibbs was listed among the Daily Journal’s “Top 30 Plaintiff Lawyers in California for 2016,” named Law360’s “2016 Consumer Protection MVP,” and included among the “Top 100 Super Lawyers” in Northern California.
  Even if you’re not technically “employed” by Amazon, you may still be entitled to collect penalties for Amazon’s employment-law violations. Contact us for a free case review.