text: Why Doesn't Anybody Respect Global Diversity Anymore? - Page 6 - Stormfront
  09-17-2009, 03:03 PM #51
  I will give my opinion from a mutt's point of view. Frankly speaking, i don't care much because we are used to the concept of being Eurasian and Hakka. My family considered ourselves as "Guests". We just take in whatever culture and adapt to our daily life. I mentioned in a half-asian thread previously that i am of italian, irish , hakka and peranakan ancestry. Hence, my family tradition's just being multi-cultural. My parents tried to teach me some heritage of both sides but in the end, i mastered neither haha. Yet, i do understand partial bit of everything except with the fact i can't speak those languages mentioned(excluding Hakka or Hokkien).
  Kinda consequence of race-mixing - you either master everything or nothing.
  For a start, i live in Singapore, which is supposedly multi-cultural compared to majority of the countries in world. Chinese, malay, indian and eurasians are cultures of ours , to be precise. Well of course, majority of Singaporeans are Chinese. I don't really tend to be subjected to some discrimination most of time due to the fact that Mandarin is my mother tongue. (I speak neither italian nor melayu) Of course, being a mutt, somehow prejudice is inevitable. Most of the old aunties tend to whisper in dialects (which i do speak a lil'bit and understand) that i look freaky, that i shouldn't be in Singapore in the 1st place, etc. You people get the idea.
  Next, i would say there's no real justification as to racial-mixing in my honest opinion. All i can really say is that, the more you guys struggle to promote ethnic heritage, the more you guys are portrayed as the anti-Hero. And *BOOM*! There goes your grand plan for preservation.
  I am not sure how my SG friends feel though, but i guessed they probably feel nonchalent to a certain extent as multi-racial society is already mentioned in the 1st place. That's why there are more mutts coming from overseas rather than home-grown mutts in Singapore. I was from Texas too though haha. Moved to SG when i was 4 or 5.
  Yes, i agree certain procedures are to be made to preserve what remaining ancestry you guys have. For instance - white, black, yellow. Well as to that point of view , i would only say make more babies if you intend to preserve your white heritage. There's no real reason to blame everything entirely on Jews, Asians, etc. It takes 2 hands to conflict(clap). It's just a basic cause-and-effect cycle. Nothing much really. It's isn't like Singapore doesn't have to deal with mainland Chinese and Banglads emigrating here in tonnes. Yet, people are just indifferent, though with the occasional prejudice here and there.
  Earlier on , there was a person who wrote that we might become a homogenous species after centuries or millenia. That's a interesting concept crafted in my mind though haha. Well that would be the ultimatum when humanity finally achieves peace. Well that's both far-fetched and plausible though. Yet, i take my bets on the former. Let's say we are together as one. Yet, we are still humans. Nature give us a sense of individuality and a brain to boot. Each of us , even though we are of the same source in this scenario, people will still sought ways to break off and form an individual group of similar-minded people or interests. It's human nature to be curious and explore other new concepts of living. The Chinese are a testimony to what humans will do irregardless even if you are of the same race. Hakka, Teochew , Cantonese , Hokkien , Shanghainese can be considered as ethnic dialects. To a certain extent, maybe even considered groups. Majority of the Chinese people in SG are of Hokkien ancestry. Yet, i asked my Singaporean classmates about those students from China who immigrate here; some said Ok , some said Yes, majority - No. As you people can see, even people of the same blood conflict with each other too. It's like asking Down Under to integrate with USA and you guys will probably know the answers, it will exactly mirror the situation above.
  Well all in all , i have just given my opinions. Love me, hate me, i don't really care as long i have my family and close friends around.
  09-18-2009, 11:11 PM #52
  Anyone else want to justify the destruction of global diversity?
  The homo sapiens of planet Earth are just switching from one form of global diversity, based on purebredization to another form of global diversity based on hybridization. As modern technology allows humans to travel to any spot on the globe in a matter of hours, it is not possible for the various sub-species to remain out of physical contact with each other and therefore, pure. The planet is too small now. Purebredization worked when it took weeks if not months to travel between the continents.
  Modern human hybrids are just as diverse as pure-breds, if not more so. Welcome to the 21st Century and the new global diversity.
  09-19-2009, 07:53 AM #53
  Japan and South Korea are almost 99.9% pure, despite being technologically and economically advanced.
  09-19-2009, 02:57 PM #54
  Well, that's two exceptions out of about 220 nations on this planet.
  A slight correction to the above which reflect new realities: Japan and South Korea USED to be 99.9% ethnically homogenous, but no more.
  Japan has a steady flow of about 15,000 immigrants per year. Japan, though not known for its immigrant population, has a range of foreigners and emigrants living within its borders. Japan has a total of 200,000 — some residents of European (including the arrival of Eastern Europeans and Russians in the late 1980s and 1990s) and North American nationalities (especially Americans and Canadians), but most are temporary residents and a small percentage are naturalized citizens.
  Japan has relatively small populations of foreign-born Asians: Chinese, Filipinos, Indonesians, Thais and Vietnamese, the majority arrived since the 1970s, but peaked in the 1980s and 1990s. Asian immigration rates, although smaller when compared to immigration into the U.S. or Europe, remain steady.
  In the 1990s and early 2000s, Japanese diplomats signed agreements with South Asian officials to obtain an estimated 50,000 temporary "guest workers" to work in Japan (e.g., Bangladesh, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India). Similar guest-worker agreements with Latin American countries, such as Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Mexico and Peru has brought another 20,000 foreigners to Japan, including Latin Americans of Japanese descent who might culturally assimilate into the Japanese population.
  In 2005 there were 1,555,505 foreign residents permanently residing in Japan, representing 1.22% of the Japanese population.
  A significant portion of these foreign residents are in fact the descendants of Korean and Chinese labourers, who, in many cases, despite being born in Japan and only speaking Japanese, are not necessarily classed as Japanese citizens. Most Koreans in Japan have never been to the Korean Peninsula and do not speak Korean.
  Here's one example, an African-American Japanese: J.R. Sakuragi , born Milton "J.R." Henderson (October 30, 1976 in Bakersfield, California, USA), is a naturalized Japanese professional basketball player.
  Raised in Bakersfield, Sakuragi played college basketball at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and was a member of their 1995 National Championship team. He was selected by the Vancouver Grizzlies in the 2nd round of the 1998 NBA Draft where he played for one season.
  In 2001, Sakuragi moved to Japan to play for the Aisin Seahorses of the JBL Super League. Sakuragi's application to become a Japanese citizen was cleared on July 2, 2007, and he changed his name from J.R. Henderson to J.R. Sakuragi. Sakuragi played for the Japan national basketball team as they competed in the FIBA Asia Championship, a qualifier for the 2008 Summer Olympics.
  Sakuragi is married and has a daughter. To comply with Japanese naturalisation requirements, he taught himself to read, speak and write Japanese at a "rudimentary level". The Sakuragis plan to stay in Japan and have no intention of returning to the U.S. anytime soon.
  J.R. Sakuragi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sakuragi_jr.jpg
  09-19-2009, 04:47 PM #55
  So OK, 99% pure, which is still within boundaries. And the demographic trends are far from changing. What is 15000 for a country of 120mil?
  In any case, there is such a thing as compatible and incompatible migrants. In the case of the western world, white (non-muslim) people are compatible and can be integrated into the society without any major problems. Arabs, negros, mestizos are incompatible and need to stay out. As for Asia, asians are compatible and can be integrated into a society of a specific asian country pretty well, unlike the Europeans (not to mention the inferior ethnicities mentioned above). Therefore, even this 15000 annual migration rate is unimportant, since the majority of it comes from Asia.
  What should be, must be and can easily be avoided is interracial migration, which can turn a once successful community into Marseilles, Rotterdam or LA.