text: While serving as secretary of state, the White House informed current presidential candidate Hillary Clinton that a two-terabyte hard drive full of records from her husband’s presidency were missing from the National Archives.
  National Archives officials presumed the drive “was stolen,” according to a April 2009 email sent by White House counsel Daniel Meltzer to Jim Messina, President Obama’s deputy chief of staff.
  “They last can account for the drive on January 30; they discovered it was missing on March 24 (NARA leadership found out later). They believe it was stolen,” Meltzer wrote to Messina, which was forwarded to Clinton aides.
  “Two terabytes is a very very large amount of data; the drive may contain a wide range of memos, emails, and other electronic documents from the Clinton White House,” Meltzer wrote.
  “All the material is unclassified, except for three documents which Bill Leary has examined and does not believe present any significant risk. Based on its analysis, NARA believes the drive contains other sensitive material,” Meltzer wrote.
  Staffers quickly forwarded the email to Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, who forwarded it to Clinton herself. In many cases, Clinton responded, “Pls print.”
  The email was one of 357 released by the Department of State Thursday as part of their investigation into Clinton’s storing classified materials on a private, unsecured email server based out of her home in Chappaqua, New York.
  Clinton turned over 55,000 pages of work-related emails to the State Department in 2014 from the private server she used while secretary of state. Clinton claims she deleted 30,000 emails that were “personal” in nature.
  It wasn’t long, however, before the FBI found 17,000 work-related emails Clinton kept or deleted. Investigators found that Clinton was improperly storing classified materials on her private server, FBI Director Comey noted.
  Comey called Clinton’s handling of classified materials “extremely careless,” but declined to recommend she be prosecuted.
  Clinton’s staff also had tens of thousands of personal emails published online by WikiLeaks, emails which were obtained from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s hacked Gmail account.
  The Gary Johnson 2016 campaign is giving people reasons not to vote for him. The Gary Johnson statement on the Supreme Court guarantees a mass exodus of support for Johnson. Johnson and his running mate suggest they would choose Stephen Breyer and Merrick Garland. With picks like these, people thinking of voting for him immediately drop by the wayside. His message is muddled and he’s playing the same game as the other candidates in the race. Playing “I’m not the other candidate or candidates” game will not cut it. It needs to be about policy and principle.
  The Gary Johnson 2016 campaign is trying to appease factions with Sanders supporters and disgruntled conservatives. Gary Johnson needs the consistency of Ron Paul and how he ran his campaign in 2012. If there’s excitement and energy for Gary Johnson I’m not seeing it. Furthermore, most libertarians think Johnson is the worst Libertarian candidate they have seen in quite some time. You are not going to attract others who are not satisfied with Hillary or Trump with low enthusiasm.
  Consequently, pandering to liberals and conservatives never ever works. Due to pandering, you continue the lesser of two evils argument. As a voter you moving to the middle does nothing for me. The choice is Republican lite or conservative lite or democrat lite or democrat. Due to a muddled message, the choice is overwhelmingly going to go for the person who is the real deal. Johnson uses the same lousy method of campaigning that Republicans have used over the last couple of cycles. Move to the mushy middle and pander to the middle instead of convincing the middle that you are right. In conclusion, the Gary Johnson 2016 campaign is off message. The more we see what they say and do, the more people realize there is no real alternative third party.