text: Underlying Trump's plan to "eliminate" government regulations is the premise that "government regulation" is itself a bad thing. And underlying that is the premise that government of by and for the people itself is illegitimate.
  Credit: DonkeyHotey
  Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
  By Dave Johnson — November 29, 2016
  Donald Trump released a video announcing his agenda for his "first day in office." One of the things he said is, "I will formulate a rule which says that for every one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated." Can we count the number of ways this is absurd and dangerous?
  Under Trump's 2-for-1 idea, if we want to have a regulation that a company can't store explosives next to an elementary school, we have to eliminate a regulation that protects us from food poisoning AND a regulation that stops companies from taking money out of your bank account for no reason? (Or how about creating fake accounts and charging them fees?)
  Or how about we eliminate the regulations requiring seat belts in cars? Or requiring cars to have headlights? There's two more! And think of all the money this would save the car companies! (Ignore the pain and suffering and loss this would cause regular Americans -- that's not money.)
  Here's one that can go: eliminate the regulations against defrauding students using high-pressure sales techniques to get them to enroll at scam universities. Or against "financial elder abuse".
  Government Is We The People
  In the United States government was once supposed to be about We the People organizing to accomplish things that make our lives better. We vote, our representatives impose taxes and spend and make laws and regulations toward that end.
  The ongoing corporate/conservative attack on the legitimacy of government and democracy have eroded public understanding of these concepts. Education. Firefighting. Scientific research. Health care. Parks. Transportation. All are core things a government of, by and FOR the people does to make our lives better -- and all are under attack, "privatized" or "eliminated" by representatives who have been "captured" by corporate/conservative money.
  Government of, by and for the people by definition stops some people from doing things that hurt others. In particular for this discussion, it stops people who have businesses from defrauding others, harming others, polluting our air and water, selling dangerous products, and other destructive practices. But this means that these people make less money, so they complain, and sometimes they use their money to influence those who would regulate to stop them.
  "Burdensome government regulations" all cost companies money: food inspection, clean water, fire codes, zoning rules and drug safety rules. They all "get in the way" of a company scamming, hurting, polluting or whatever makes them more money.
  Regulations too often come about as a reaction to something terrible happening. Fire codes came from times when entire towns burned down. Drug-safety rules came from "snake oil" scammers selling poison and leaving town before the damage is done. Seat belt regulations came from terrible traffic injuries and deaths.
  Regulations are about "how can We the People do this better?"
  The Underlying Assumptions Behind Trump's Absurd Plan
  Underlying Trump's plan to "eliminate" government regulations is the premise that "government regulation" is itself a bad thing. And underlying that is the premise that government of by and for the people itself is illegitimate. It gets in the way of business. We the People making decisions interferes with efficient decision-making done for the narrow purpose of making money.
  Corporate-financed conservatives will always tell you that government and its regulations are always bad. Government just "interferes" in things it knows nothing about. They will say that government regulations hold back businesses from expanding and hiring and generally getting things done that make money. But these are self-interested complaints from people who make their money scamming or hurting or polluting. People like Donald Trump.
  We should see Trump's proposal for what it is. This is not an approach to governing, it is about dismantling what government is for so that an already-wealthy few are free to fleece, scam, harm and and pollute in the name of greed.
  Topics:
  democracy, Government, Regulation, trump
  Can you help us out?
  For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.
  Become a subscriber:
  To become an ad-free subscriber please select one of the following two options. Once you click your selected plan a window will open taking you to Admiral, our ad-free partner.
  Monthly
  Enjoy ad-free browsing while paying as you go.
  Just $1 for a month
  $4.99/month thereafter
  Select Plan
  Yearly
  Enjoy a full year of ad-free browsing.
  $50.00/year
  Select Plan
  **Does not apply to Comments, YouTube or any other embedded service ads. View our Ad-Free FAQ for more information.
  Make a donation:
  If you don't mind the ads and would rather donate, please select one of the options below:
  Kindest
  Donate via PayPal
  Via Snail Mail
  payable to: Crooksandliars
  P.O. BOX 1789
  Pacific Palisades, CA 90272-9997
  Explore more
  'The Simpsons' Recreate The Chaos Of Trump's First 100 Days
  LeftOfCenter — Apr 28th, 2017
  Trump's First 100 Days Brings Lowest Approval Rating Ever
  John Amato — Apr 21st, 2017
  The First 100 Days Of Resistance
  Richard RJ Eskow — Apr 28th, 2017
  Who's To Blame For Trump's Failed First 100 Days? The Constitution, Of Course
  Red Painter — Apr 30th, 2017
  Trump's Milestone: 100 Days At His Golf Courses
  Ed Scarce — Mar 4th, 2018
  CNN Rejects Trump 'First 100 Days' Campaign Ad Because It's 'Fake'
  John Amato — May 2nd, 2017
  Discussion
  New Commenting System
  Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. When registering you will also be presented with the option to tie all your old Disqus comments to your new Insticator account. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.
  We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.