text: Casey B. Mulligan is an economics professor at the University of Chicago. He is the author of “The Redistribution Recession: How Labor Market Distortions Contracted the Economy.”
  The payroll tax holiday was an important factor helping the workweek recover after the recession, but the holiday is over and new public policies are pushing in the other direction.
  Today's Economist
  Perspectives from expert contributors.
  Full-time positions pay more than part-time positions, even on an hourly basis. Part-time positions require less time away from family, schooling, etc., which makes the choice of full-time versus part-time work a trade-off between income received and the amount of the time commitment.
  A higher income tax or payroll tax rate tilts the balance toward part-time work because it reduces an important benefit of full-time work: extra income to spend. A lower rate does the opposite.
  You might say that work schedules are set by employers, and that workers have no say in the matter. But that ignores the fact that employers compete for employees, which is why many employers spend resources to offer health coverage, flexible scheduling and other fringe benefits that employees find attractive.
  Historically, employers have responded to high income tax rates by creating part-time positions, especially when large numbers of potential employers were facing those rates.
  For many years, the Social Security earnings limit reduced the reward to full-time work among elderly people, because a large part of their Social Security benefits were withheld when beneficiaries earned more than the limit. As a result of the income tax implicit in the Social Security rules, many businesses created part-time positions that were attractive to older workers because their earnings stayed below the limit, and many accepted them.
  Between 2007 and 2010, expansions of the food stamp program, known as SNAP, made part-time work increasingly attractive for those who would face the program’s income limit if working full time. About the same time, federal mortgage modification guidelines acted as income-tax increases on homeowners who owed more on their mortgage than their home was worth, because the more the homeowner earned, the less the mortgage balance was reduced. As a result, a few people found part-time work to be a more effective way of cutting their debt.
  I have quantified the disincentives for full-time work and their evolution, accounting for the fraction of the population taking part in these and other programs and showing the results in the chart below. A higher tax rate means less incentive to work full time and more incentive to work part time.
  Photo
  Source: Author's calculations.Credit
  Between 2007 and 2012, there had been little net change in the tax rate on full-time work because the 2011-12 payroll tax holiday largely offset the increases from SNAP and mortgage modification. I think this is an important reason that weekly work hours recovered from the recession much more quickly than employment has.
  But a year ago the payroll tax holiday expired and, more important, beginning this week incomes earned will reduce the subsidies that families might hope to receive as part of the new insurance plans created by the Affordable Care Act.
  For these reasons, the recovery of the workweek from the recession cannot be taken for granted.
  What's Next
  Loading...
  Previous Post
  Responding to Readers on ‘The House Edge’	
  Next Post
  A Transition in Fannie and Freddie Oversight	
  Featured Contributors
  Floyd Norris, the chief financial correspondent of The New York Times, covers the world of finance and economics.
  Posts | Profile | E-mail
  Binyamin Appelbaum covers business and economic topics for the Washington bureau of The New York Times.
  Posts | Profile | E-Mail | Twitter
  Shaila Dewan is an economics reporter for The New York Times.
  Posts | E-mail | Twitter
  Annie Lowrey covers economic policy for the Washington bureau of The New York Times.
  Posts | Profile | E-mail | Twitter
  Eduardo Porter is the Economic Scene columnist for The New York Times.
  Posts | Profile | E-Mail | Twitter
  Nelson D. Schwartz is an economics reporter for The New York Times.
  Posts | Profile | E-Mail | Twitter
  Daily Economists
  Each day, Economix offers perspectives from expert contributors.
  Bruce Bartlett
  Former Treasury Official
  Bio | Posts | Twitter
  Jared Bernstein
  Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
  Bio | Posts
  Nancy Folbre
  University of Massachusetts-Amherst
  Bio | Posts
  Simon Johnson
  M.I.T./Peterson Institute
  Bio | Posts
  Casey B. Mulligan
  University of Chicago
  Bio | Posts
  Uwe E. Reinhardt
  Princeton University
  Bio | Posts
  Phillip Swagel
  University of Maryland
  Bio | Posts
  Laura D'Andrea Tyson
  University of California, Berkeley
  Bio | Posts
  Recent Posts
  Economix Meets the Gales of Change
  Economix is coming to an end, but it will be succeeded by The Upshot, a new politics, policy and economics site. Read more…
  Mortgage Reform Is Worth the Small Extra Cost to Borrowers
  The higher cost for borrowers in a Senate bill reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac corresponds to the protection for taxpayers that was missing in the old system, writes an economist. Read more…
  In Europe, Auto Sales Are Still Low, But They Are Rising
  New car sales are up by more than 10 percent in Ireland, Greece, Spain and Portugal, which signals stronger economic growth there, even if sales are still far below 2007 levels.Read more…
  The End of Our Financial Illusions
  Much progress has been made on overseeing the largest banks, but a good deal more must be done to toughen standards and end government subsidies, an economist writes. Read more…
  Stealth Taxes Are Still Income Taxes
  The Affordable Care Act imposes economic burdens that are the equivalent of taxes, an economist writes. Read more…
  About
  Economics doesn't have to be complicated. It is the study of our lives — our jobs, our homes, our families and the little decisions we face every day. Here at Economix, journalists and economists analyze the news and use economics as a framework for thinking about the world. We welcome feedback, at economix@nytimes.com.
  Our Policy on Comments
  Archive
  Select Month April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013