text: Configure Exchange 2010 with disjointed name space. Your internal domain name is different form public domain name (advnet.prv = test.ncstech.org). Configure email policy for user mailbox creation along with allowing acceptable domains. Set the OWA access so users will no longer have to type the domain and username. Also, there was an issue with Exchange updates that showed only a blank screen when users tried to access OWA. There's an Exchange Powershell script to fix this.
  "You are like a wilderness guide for the psyche. The trip is so much easier and enjoyable when the guide knows what to watch out for, when to set up tent and when to move on. Thank you for guiding me through this daunting territory and then out to where it is bright and clear.
  "The sessions we have had together have made it clear that you are very qualified and highly skilled . And unlike any other I have had before, your attentiveness and intuitive sense to know how to approach and guide me through tough moments left me in awe. Something that you provide in our time together offers me a place to go very deep and feel things that I may be quite afraid to feel or show, or even touch, with most others.
  "For the first time in my life, when a deep and old pattern was repeating itself, I was able to stay with it without abandoning myself or retreating into the same old protective measures. The space you held provided a platform for me to explore the behaviour itself rather than how I was going to hide it or get rid of it. I feel, and know I am not speaking too soon, that this was a very important moment and I would not have been able to look at it without your presence.
  "I felt a great sense of personal power when I discovered that and realized I had choices where previously I’d felt at the whim of what I’d thought was part of my temperament. I have experienced lasting behaviour change through this approach, something I’m very proud of! I highly recommend this approach and to have Simon accompanying you. Simon is an excellent guide – gentle, clear, observant and insightful.
  "Simon's process took my understanding of myself as a leader and mentor to a new level. Through the critical reflection that he guided me through, I have developed a much stronger appreciation of myself as informed in how others perceive me and respond to me, releasing and enabling me to be more effective in working with others.
  "Supervision we did together with my two clients a couple of years ago was really good and helpful. I think they are both going well now in themselves and your input played a significant part in that to help me get a little bit deeper into their experience around some of their major themes. I really appreciate the somatic approaches you have presented to me to assist in the processing of trauma. They have been an important development in my approach over the past couple of years, incorporating somatics, spirituality and trauma memory processing and re-integration. Thank you sincerely for your work and role in bringing these approaches to practitioners, and then on to clients!!!
  "I’m deeply grateful to have found this approach, as I’ve been able to work with painful feelings and thoughts that I have avoided for years. Even avoided while not knowing I am avoiding. Thank you for helping to make my journey a positive one.
  "In one session with Simon, I was able to release a limitation that I had not consciously been aware of. This release has supported me in accessing more of my own gifts and my own brilliance and has increased my confidence and competence in key areas of my life. Thank you Simon for your sensitive, intuitive brilliance, and your compassionate, professional, intelligent self. Your ability to listen deeply and to move into those deep places with profound care was-and-is powerful for me.
  "The environment that developed from Simon’s deep way of accompanying me allowed me to open to a depth of simple knowing that I had not experienced before. I felt deeply familiar and yet my experience was vastly different from the striving and discouragement I had been experiencing in the weeks prior to our session. He provides such a large space with his depth and keen intellect that I could cavort freely without fear of leaving him behind, and without fear of seeming weird… He was seamlessly present with me every step of the way, allowing me to explore new directions and perspectives. Simon is adept at meeting people where they are, without judgment or pressure. He seems to get out of the way - and even more remarkably - help me get out of my own way. I recommend him highly.
  "Meeting you, Simon, even via skype, it didn´t take more than a heartbeat to know I´m safe to look for my truth. Sharp intellect, uncompromising respect. Rarely if ever in life have I met anybody able to offer and maintain such profound space for connecting and healing the way you do. THANK YOU - NAMASTE.
  "Simon is a trusted colleague, a multi-disciplinary facilitator who hears and encourages subtle signals that surface in his clients’ minds. He believes that all of us make ourselves immune to change. We cultivate safe havens of familiar behaviors that serve us well. When we’re confronted by large undeﬁned change - even if we say we want it - we will ﬁght it with the antibodies we have created. They mindlessly protect us from anything unfamiliar. Age is NOT an advantage.
  Now, in the most unlikely ways, I feel like I’m actively pursuing things that I knew I wanted to do. The heavy stone has yielded and begun to move. In its essence this work matches my original goal perfectly. I don’t imagine I would be here without Simon’s coaching and the vaccines he provided.
  Last Wednesday I posted on a French court decision that underlined the legality of copy protection measures. I pointed out that this decision was more about the possibility to use consumer protection law to protect consumers against such measures, rather than through copyright law itself (e.g. private copying clause). In the last paragraph I noted that a real decision about private copying would be given in a few days in another case, possibly generating more sensationalistic headlines like "Court Kills the Right that Never Was".
  The decision came on Friday, but he headline is different then expected, as the title of this post makes clear. A Paris Court of Appeal reversed an earlier decision that had rejected private use as a right and now prohibited the use of copy protection measures on DVDs, being incompatible with this private use. For some background an excerpt from Natali Helberger's article on the first, reversed decision:
  The personal copying exception in French copyright law, so the court says, has not the quality of a "right". Instead, the personal copying exception describes the (exceptional) case that consumers who want to make a copy for personal use are not obliged to acquire the rightsholder's permission before doing so. The court went further and argued that nothing different could apply once France had implemented the European Copyright Directive. The Directive left it to member states whether they would provide for a personal copying exception. But even if France decided to do so, the personal copying exception must, according to the Directive, not conflict with the normal exploitation of a work or unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of rightsholders. The court then decided that the selling of copies of DVDs was a case of normal exploitation, and rightsholders had a legitimate interest to recoup the investments made.
  The latest decision apparently takes a different stand. I've not yet found the ruling, but it is an interesting one, not the least from the perspective of European law. As said, the European Copyright Directive (EUCD) leaves it to member states to ensure that consumers can benefit from copyright exemptions, if the rightsholders using the protection measures don't do so voluntarily (article. 6(4) EUCD). However, fifteen of the 21 exemptions under the EUCD do not have to be provided, amongst which private use. The national provision of a private copying exemption is not mandatory on the basis of the EUCD. This leaves much to decide to the courts, if the national legislature fails or chooses not to intervene.
  In general France is taking some interesting steps when it comes to the protection of private use. This latest decision follows on an earlier one, which acquitted a 500+ movies downloader and burner on the basis of the private copying clause. French magistrates also speak out for the "MP3 generation". However, some of the court decision are not in line with each other. This seems very much a transition period that lacks clarity on which side of interests will finally be solidified.
  Their reasoning was that there no such a right to private copy, private copying is only an exception to activities that require authorization from rights holder, so technological measures that prevent copying are lawful.
  Not having read the decision, I guess that the reasoning is wrong, because right or exception, the issue here if it is effective as described in the statute or it can be easily circumvented by technological measures.