text: Front Matter : Theoretical Aspects of the Design of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs:
  A Study by the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund
  Theoretical aspects of the design of Fund-supported adjustment programs : a study / by the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund—Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 1987
  v, 51 p. ; (Occasional paper ; no. 55)
  "Originally prepared for a seminar of the Executive Board of the fund"—P. v.
  Bibliography: p. 48–51.
  1. International Monetary Fund—Developing countries. 2. Developing countries—Economic policy. 3. Economic stabilization—Developing countries. 4. Loans, Foreign—Developing countries, I. International Monetary Fund. Research Dept., II. Series: Occasional paper (International Monetary Fund) ; no. 55.
  HG3881.5.158T435 1987
  ISBN 0-939934-99-X
  Internet: pubserv@imf.org
  Some Extensions of the Financial Planning Framework
  III. 1. Time Path of Real Money Balances in Response to Monetary Shock
  IV. 2. Effects of Interest-Rate Policy on Private Saving and Investment
  3. Effects of a Devaluation
  4. Growth Paths for Exports, Debt, Investment Income Payments, and the Current Account Balance
  This study was prepared in the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund. It was drafted by Michael P. Dooley, Morris Goldstein, Mohsin S. Khan, Malcolm D. Knight, Anthony Lanyi, Donald J. Mathieson, Peter J. Montiel, and Rudolf R. Rhomberg. The paper has benefited from comments by staff in other departments and was edited by Juanita Roushdy of the External Relations Department.
  The paper was originally prepared for a seminar of the Executive Board of the Fund. In the seminar, Executive Directors expressed a broad range of views with regard to both the adequacy of the Fund's approach to financial programming and the validity of the analysis presented in this paper. While the present version reflects comments and suggestions made by a number of Executive Directors, it would have been impossible to comprehend the entire range of their views. Consequently, the paper should be taken as expressing solely the views of its authors and not those of either Executive Directors or the Fund.