text: 49'ers apparently want to trade up to the 13th spot - NY Jets Forum - JetNation.com
  April 22, 2013 in NY Jets Forum
  http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000162250/article/san-francisco-49ers-eager-to-trade-up-in-2013-nfl-draft
  i dont have time to look at the value chart but could we nab a 2014 number 1 to trade down?
  Edited April 22, 2013 by neckdemon
  I think the idea is that the 49ers have more picks this year than they have room for, so bundling a few of them to move up for a potential impact player makes sense. So I don't think any 2014 picks would be in play with them.
  I'd rather have Austin than the number 30 or so pick next year. From what I understand we have a bunch of them.
  If we MUST trade with them, the Niners have like 11 picks this year, send some of them our way if that's the case.
  Edited April 22, 2013 by Gastineau Lives
  suppousedly if everything works out with comp picks we are gonna have a sh*tload of cap space and a lot of picks next year. So id rather just get 2 immediette starters with the 9 and 13 this year
  They're nervous about not re-signing Justin Smith to superdollars after this year and want to get his replacement a year before he leaves rather than forcing the position in round 1 of next year's draft even if the value isn't there.
  They must be cheap. They don't have a single $10M/year player & I don't even know that they have a single $8M/year player. Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  The '9ers have the #31 and #34 picks in this year's draft. If you look at this draft chart, the value of #31 and #34 add up almost exactly to the value of #13.
  I would love to see them trade down on at least one of the picks. If nothing else, the trade made this week so much more fun.
  I would take their 31st and 34th. This draft may not have star value type players but it is a deep draft with some good talent.
  also heard the Falcons could trade up for Sheldon Richardson... also in that teens area.
  Bingo. I'd be happy with 9, 31, 34 and 39.
  I'd be even happier with Mingo/Jones, Austin and 39.
  Getting a late first (#31) and the very early second (#34) would feel like trading for two second round picks.
  Let them move up to #9 and get a third rounder in the process.
  That can't be true. I better go double check the internets.
  Minnesota's also rumored to want to move up. Coincidentally, their #23 and #52 also add up nicely to about the value of #13.
  I don't know jack about the draft. You guys are the experts.
  But I think having 4 picks that early gives us a better chance to overcome our historical bust ratio.
  Edited April 22, 2013 by JerryK
  the trade down seems likely from 13. Besides the holes on the team, I think it was slats who said that trading down from 13 lessens the "replacement" aspect of that pick. I.e. Imagine the Jets take Tyler Eifert at 13. That player will forever be known as the guy they got for Revis. but the trade down muddys the waters.
  as for what it would take, the 49ers have picks 31 and 34 that is almost an even swap with Jets 13 according to the chart
  jets 13 1150
  49ers 31 600
  49ers 34 560
  Edited April 22, 2013 by bitonti
  In this draft, and considering we still have the #9 to work with, I'd trade 13 for 31 and 34 in a heartbeat.
  9, 31, 34, 39--
  Mingo, Cyprian, Nassib, Ertz
  Cooper, Lemonier, Reid, Woods
  Star, Patterson, Elam, Collins
  9 - Jordan, 31 - Eiffert, 34 - Cyprian, 39 - Nassib, Warford in 3rd, Christine Michael in 4th, TJ McDonald in 5th, Mike Catapano in 6th, Some WR in 7th
  A 1st in 2014 doesn't mean much today for the Jets. It has to be their 31st, their 2nd this year, and their first next year. Maybe Im greedy? But we are giving away 1150 points and getting just 600 draft value points this year. Not sure what the chart of comparing points from this year to future year is, but the general rule is, a 1st next year is about equivalent to a 2nd this year. So a 1st, a 2nd, and 1st next year comes to about 1200 (600+300+300).
  The 31st and 34th is equal value. Call me greedy but if I'm the Jets I want slightly more than equal value. Like acquiring a 5th or swapping a late 4th for an early 6th.
  I like this, and maybe get one of their 3rds for a 6th.
  Edited April 22, 2013 by Obrien2Toon
  I so want the Jets to make this move now and take Eifert at 34.
  forget it he will be gone like 10-20 slots earlier.
  Then I want him at 13.
  Eifert's a safe pick, but he'll never be an elite tight end. The bust factor is small, but he's never going to be an explosive playmaker either. I wouldnt hate the pick, 13 just seems too early.
  Matt39 doesn't like the pick - Eifert at 13 it is!!!!
  This draftin' crap is easy yo!
  It really is baffling. When you somehow have the likes of you, me and Pac (and obviously plenty more, but I think you get my point here) all on the same side of an argument, it really starts to speak volumes.
  Trading down, and collecting more picks is where it's at, I think there will be a few teams temping the Jets for 13. Hopefully work some Team over for "Their guy".
  Edited April 22, 2013 by stoicsentry
  Agreed 100%. Historically, TE's in general that are selected in the first round, dont live up to that value.
  Jermaine Gresham, Brandon Pettigrew, Dustin Keller, Greg Olson, Vernon Davis, Mercedes Lewis, Heather Miller, Kellen Winslow, Ben Watson, Dallas Clark, Jeremy Shockey, Daniel Graham, Jeremay Stevens, Todd Heap, Bubba Franks, Anthony Bect, Tony G, David LaFluer, Ricky Dudley, Kyle Brady, Mark Bruener, Ivry Smith, Derek Brow, Johnny Mitchel, Eric Green.
  Those are the 1st round selected TE's since 1990. What, maybe 2-3 were worthy of a 1st round selection?
  And the difference between Eifert and Ertz is minimal IMO. I love both in the 2nd. Not a big fan of either in the 1st. And, I wouldnt be upset at all if we just waited and took the best of Kelce, Escobar, McDonald, Reed, etc. Who might not be Eifert or Ertz but solid TE's nonetheless.