text: What if law shaped technologies? [Science and Technology Podcast] | Epthinktank | European Parliament
  HOME
  PUBLICATIONS
  BLOG
  GRAPHICS WAREHOUSE
  SCRUTINY TOOLBOX
  ABOUT
  HOME
  PUBLICATIONS
  BLOG
  GRAPHICS WAREHOUSE
  SCRUTINY TOOLBOX
  ABOUT
  By Scientific Foresight (STOA) / June 29, 2018
  What if law shaped technologies? [Science and Technology Podcast]
  Technology does not operate outside its legal context. Law reacts to technological developments through the adoption, for example, of health and employment rules, or tax and risk assessment standards, to prevent technological advances from undermining human rights, environmental standards and democratic values.
  © piick / Shutterstock
  Written by Mihalis Kritikos,
  © piick / Shutterstock
  Technology does not operate outside its legal context. Law reacts to technological developments through the adoption, for example, of health and employment rules, or tax and risk assessment standards, to prevent technological advances from undermining human rights, environmental standards and democratic values. Law imposes critical choices upon objectively uncertain scientific judgements and value-biased knowledge. But what if law, overcoming the pacing and regulatory connection problems, could restore human agency in the face of overwhelming technological developments, shape the diffusion and adoption of technology in its various forms and even anticipate technological trends?
  Legal provisions contain or imply decisions about the scope and ownership of intellectual property, about the permissible degree of extraction and processing of personal data, and about who is allowed to access technological outputs. These legal interventions mostly take the form of a reactive approach to today’s wide range of technological risks. The law’s ex-post-facto intervention, in this respect, may not necessarily constitute a weakness; the vagueness inherent in legal provisions may compensate for unforeseeable cases that require the questioning of traditional assumptions about the socio-technical context in which law will operate.
  However, disruptive technologies develop at such an exponential pace that traditional legal oversight mechanisms are outpaced by the rate of technological change, the evolution of which is so rapid that it can escape the language of existing regulations. By the time new regulations become legally binding, they are often only able to address a minor part of the wider technological effects which have already spread beyond the conceptual scheme of law.
  Listen to podcast ‘What if law shaped technologies?‘
  As a result, the pre-existing legal structure may prove a poor match for new types of disputes raised by disruptive technologies. And the gaps are getting wider as technology advances ever more rapidly. So can the legal system overcome the temporal gap between the emergence of a technology and the subsequent need to exercise control over its possible effects, and retain both flexibility and responsiveness? What regulation is justified by a particular technology? Are particular legal instruments better suited to controlling particular technological developments characterised by high scientific uncertainty or high development costs? How can law regulate uncertain and unknown futures in the face of limited knowledge?
  Uncertainty and lack of knowledge can be dealt with through the introduction of ‘sunset clauses’, which make rules subject to revision after a predetermined period of time, and forward-looking ex-ante regulatory impact assessments. Alternatively, under such conditions, regulation by agency may be considered a useful supplement to the traditional regulation by contract, as, in the case of the former, the regulatory regime can then be adjusted in a timely and more flexible manner in the light of market and technological developments. The question is if, given the constraints of a ‘hard law’ approach, legal systems are ready to adopt ‘prospective and homeostatic’ instruments, capable of adapting themselves to a changing technological landscape? In the frame of EU law, this role can be exerted, for example, by the numerous agencies established at the EU level in technology-based domains, such as the European Food Safety Authority, the European Chemicals Agency and the European Medicines Agency. These decentralised authorities have been empowered to adjust the EU regulatory regime to the latest technological developments by issuing expert opinions, decisions and guidelines, which, despite their non-binding legal character, constitute authoritative points of legal reference, due to their specificity, expert-driven nature and evidence-based approach.
  Some countries like the UK, the USA, Switzerland and Australia have tried to bridge this gap by offering what is known as a ‘regulatory sandbox’. These initiatives aim to provide space where, primarily, fintech (financial technology) firms can test their innovations in a less restrictive regulatory environment for a limited period. This helps the firms in question to get licences and develop in a way that will make them compliant but in a more efficient manner.
  What does the legal conceptualisation of technology mean for European policy-making?
  Though the early stages in the development of a technology, when there are still many unknowns, are a challenging time for developing a legal framework, they can also be an opportune time for taking advantage of the flexibility of a new approach. Although no law can encode the entire complexity of technology as it is, let alone predict its future development, there is an imperative need for EU law to develop a proactive and iterative function, to anticipate technological trends and future risks of activities that are in constant evolution. While technology itself is not a reason to regulate, such a proactive approach could ensure that disruptive technologies are deployed in a way that is consistent with established principles and values.
  In the frame of EU law, the adoption and application of the precautionary principle and the principle of intergenerational equity could affect the way a specific technology is framed and, if necessary, contained. The precautionary principle basically holds that, since every technology and technological advance poses some theoretical danger or risk, public policy should be crafted in such a way that no possible harm will occur when the technology is deployed. The principle of intergenerational equity requires legislators in the field of technology regulation to consider the impact current decisions will have on future generations’ interests in a variety of contexts, including fiscal policy, pension fund regulation and financial regulation more generally.
  The role of delegated and implementing acts in the frame of the EU rule-making process is crucial, as their adoption may lead to the prioritisation of one technological path over another. Despite their apparent technical nature – given that their activation is triggered by scientific and technological developments – these acts might involve important political choices and have a significant impact on citizens’ daily lives. They are used in a wide range of policy areas, for example, implementing measures on energy labelling, authorisation of certain types of food additives and civil aviation safety control equipment. Technology assessments that forecast the social and economic impacts of new technologies, and regulatory impact assessments that attempt to predict the social and economic impacts of proposed EU legal acts are usually conducted ex ante, and may shape technological trajectories in an upstream manner.
  The apparent effectiveness of regulatory sandboxes may also pave the way for the creation of testbeds for new technologies in the domain of the Internet of Things and driverless cars. The ability of the law to break with established traditional perceptions of technology, and operate in uncharted territory, will depend on the willingness of EU legislators to introduce new types of legal instruments.
  It would also require the introduction of new forms of engagement with the evolving nature of scientific and technological ecosystems. While some ‘black swan’ technological events will remain impossible to predict, a real-time regulatory system that constantly analyses scientific trends would go a long way towards ensuring that regulatory policy proactively adapts to an evolving disruptive ecosystem, and influences the design of technologies.
  Read this At a glance on ‘What if law shaped technologies?‘ on the Think Tank pages of the European Parliament.
  Share this…
  Facebook
  Twitter
  Linkedin
  Share this...
  Facebook
  Twitter
  Linkedin
  Categories: PUBLICATIONS Tags: At a glance, At a glance EPRS, delegated legislation, implementing Regulation, Mihalis Kritikos, precautionary principle, regulation, rule of law, Scientific Foresight: What if?, STOA
  Scientific Foresight (STOA)
  The Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA) carries out interdisciplinary research and provides strategic advice in the field of science and technology options assessment and scientific foresight. It undertakes in-depth studies and organises workshops on developments in these fields, and it hosts the European Science-Media Hub (ESMH), a platform to promote networking, training and knowledge sharing between the EP, the scientific community and the media. All this work is carried out under the guidance of the Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA), composed of 27 MEPs nominated by 11 EP Committees. The STOA Panel forms an integral part of the structure of the EP.
  Related Articles
  Markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) [EU Legislation in Progress]
  Sustainable use of plant protection products [EU Legislation in Progress]
  ‘Deglobalisation’ [What Think Tanks are thinking]
  Preventing radicalisation in the European Union: How EU policy has evolved
  Plenary round-up – November II 2022
  Instrumentalisation in the field of migration and asylum [EU Legislation in Progress]
  Accelerating the deployment of renewable energy during the crisis
  European media freedom act [EU Legislation in Progress]
  Children’s rights in the EU in the light of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
  Russia’s war on Ukraine: People with disabilities
  Enhancing solidarity in EU gas markets
  Russia’s war on Ukraine nine months on [What Think Tanks are thinking]
  Comments
  What if law shaped technologies? [Science and Technology Podcast] | Vatcompany.net says:
  June 29, 2018 at 20:05
  […] Source Article from https://epthinktank.eu/2018/06/29/what-if-law-shaped-technologies-science-and-technology-podcast/ […]
  Loading...
  Reply
  Leave a Reply Cancel reply
  Download the EPRS App
  In focus
  Coronavirus (Covid-19)
  EP Plenary Sessions
  Cost of Non-Europe reports
  Latest Media
  Climate Change
  Immigration
  Russia's war on Ukraine
  We write about
  BLOG
  EP Answers
  Events
  Replies to campaigns from citizens
  What Europe does for you
  PUBLICATIONS
  Economic and Social Policies
  EU Financing / Budgetary Affairs
  Institutional and Legal Affairs
  International Relations
  Policy Cycle
  Structural and Cohesion Policies
  RSS Link to Scientific Foresight (STOA)
  RSS Link
  Social Media
  Twitter
  LinkedIn
  YouTube
  Pinterest
  Blogroll
  EP Think Tank
  STOA
  Citizens' enquiry service
  Historical Archives
  EP Library catalogue
  100 Books on Europe to Remember
  What Europe does for me
  URBIS
  ORBIS
  Disclaimer and Copyright statement
  The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.
  For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.
  Copyright © European Union, 2014-2022. All rights reserved.
  Blogroll
  100 Books on Europe to Remember
  Citizens' enquiry service
  EP Library catalogue
  EP Think Tank
  Historical Archives
  ORBIS
  STOA
  URBIS
  What Europe does for me
  In focus
  Climate Change
  Coronavirus (Covid-19)
  Cost of Non-Europe reports
  EP Plenary Sessions
  Immigration
  Latest Media
  Russia's war on Ukraine
  Quick Links
  EU Legislation in Progress
  Podcasts
  Topical Digests
  Social Media
  LinkedIn
  Pinterest
  Twitter
  YouTube
  Subscribe to Blog via Email
  Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
  Email Address
  Subscribe
  Join 3,818 other subscribers
  Terms and conditions
  The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page. Copyright © European Union, 2014-2022. All rights reserved.
  EPRS Homepage
  Copyright © European Union, 2014-2022. All rights reserved.
  We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.
  You can find out more about which cookies we are using in settings.
  Close GDPR Cookie Banner
  Accept
  Settings
  Close GDPR Cookie Banner
  Loading Comments...
  Write a Comment...
  Email (Required)
  Name (Required)
  Website
  %d bloggers like this:
  Change cookie settings
  Close GDPR Cookie Settings
  Privacy Overview
  Strictly Necessary Cookies
  Cookie Policy
  Powered by GDPR Cookie Compliance
  Privacy Overview
  This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
  Strictly Necessary Cookies
  Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
  Enable or Disable Cookies
  If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
  Cookie Policy
  More information about our Cookie Policy.
  The present website is hosted by WordPress.com, a service by Automattic. Automattic is a global company with thousands of servers located in several separate data centres around the world. While Automattic takes care of the security of the platform, we, the European Parliamentary Research Service, own the content of the blog. For more detailed information about the compliance of Automattic products and services with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), please see their dedicated page.
  Data collected
  We do not collect any personal data that could identify an individual user. The users that are registered in WordPress.com should consult wordpress.com terms of service. We do collect anonymised aggregate data for statistical purposes. The data collected for this purposes include: number of visits/visitors per page, the country of the user, and aggregate numbers of incoming and outgoing clicks.
  We determine unique page counts by using a “hashed” version of the visitor’s IP address. The visitor’s full IP address is deleted from our logs after a little over a month. That timeframe is how long the data is needed in order to allow us to calculate your stats on a monthly basis and no longer.
  We collect your email address only if you proactively requested to be notified about the updates on the blog. You can always contact us to remove your email address from our records or unsubscribe from the notification service.
  We can also see your name and email address if you made a comment to one of our posts. We do not make the email address visible on the comment. Nevertheless, on request, we can delete your comments.
  Cookies
  We collect cookies only to facilitate your browsing experience, such as enabling you to share our posts via social media or comment on the post. The majority of cookies will be used only if you are a registered WordPress.com user. In this case, you are bound to WordPress.com terms of service.
  Some pages embed content from third parties. In this case, you will need to actively consent to their terms in order to see the content.
  We do not collect cookies to show advertisement nor resell any information collected with cookies to third parties. Read more about the wordpress.com cookie policy and the way to control cookies on their dedicated page.