text: Step 3- Now, on this page, click on the relevant link. The application will be submitted in two parts, therefore you have to complete part I- registration first and then have to proceed to part II.
  Step 4: Now you will find the instructions to fill the application form. Read them and click on Yes Button.
  Step 6: Provide information about your photo id type, engineering branch, the centre of the main examination.
  Step 7: Click on the continue button to reach to Registration II part. In II part you will have to first enter your category. Then upload the required document as mentioned in the article.
  Step 8: Make the payment of the application fee and click on the declaration statement was given on the webpage.
  Candidates will have to pay 200/- as application fee to apply for the exam. The application fee can be paid through online banking or other ways of cashless transactions. The offline option is also available to pay the application fee for UPSC CMS 2020. Female applicants and candidates from SC/ST/PwBD categories are exempted from the payment of application fee.
  Yes, you can also opt for offline mode to pay the application fee. For this, you will have to deposit the Rs. 200 in any SBI branch.
  The authorities will release the e-admit card for UPSC CMS 2020 and it will be available before 10-8 days from the exam.
  
  Most of us cold climate folks have heard of the North Face Clothing line. Recently a biomedical student started a small clothing line in his spare time that parodied the North Face name. Proving that he had a sense of humor, he named his line "South Butt."
  Big conglomerate North Face Clothing? Meet tiny, one man show "South Butt" clothing line. Tiny South Butt, meet North Face's team of lawyers and a lawsuit. North Face is suing the student for copyright infringment and other legal harms.
  Experts interviewed in the article predicted that the lawsuit will probably go nowhere. In fact, it's likely to backfire. Not only does this frivolous lawsuit make North Face look petty and paranoid, it will probably result in more "South Butt" sales.
  The irony here is that corporate America complains all the time about "frivolous lawsuits" that drive up the cost of goods. This lawsuit shows that corporations often file their own ill founded lawsuits and don't hseitate to hire their legions of lawyers to throw their weight around. So where's The Chamber Of Commerce on this laugher of a lawsuit? Why aren't they rushing in to defend this student like they did when the dry cleaner in Washington D.C. was sued for $54 million by a malcontent customer whose pants were lost (an equally stupid lawsuit)?
  I could never pull the trigger on North Face clothes--a little to expensive for my tastes. This is an even better reason not to buy their line. Good luck, South Butt dude. Although apparently opposites do attract, here, in the form of a lawsuit, I hope NF gets some sense and drops this suit.
  Recently a colleague of mine pointed out an error in my past blog posts discussing Ohio's "caps" or limits on what Ohio medical malpractice victims can recover in lawsuits. In those previous posts, I pointed out that the Ohio Legislature in 2003 passed laws limiting malpractice victims' recovery to arbitrary caps of anywhere from $250,000 to $350,000.
  She said to me: "You forgot to mention that there are no caps or limits in cases of wrongful death." And she's right. The reason for this is that Section 19a, Article I of The Ohio Constitution states that damages recoverable in wrongful death claims
  cannot be limited. Since The Ohio Constitution trumps any attempt by the Legislature to contradict it, The Legislature could not pass any caps in wrongful death cases.
  So there you have it. I'm just glad someone was actually reading some of this stuff and paying attention.
  As I have said repeatedly, passing medical malpractice tort reform will do nothing to lower the spiraling costs of Ohioans' health care premuims. Two recent articles prove (again) how bogus this argument is.
  The first is a December 17, 2009 internet article entitled "Medical Mutual Of Ohio's View Of Healthcare Reform, authored by George Stadtlander, its Chief Managed Care Officer. The article discusses the pros and cons of the current proposals in Congress, but this little ditty really caused me to rise out of my chair:
  Another huge issue in this debate is tort reform. There have been proposals for comprehensive tort reform that would reduce the cost of delivery, but they have been widely ignored.
  Really? What this article and Mr. Stadtlander did NOT mention is that we have had medical "tort reform" in Ohio now for over six years! Since 2003, there have been arbitrary caps or limits on what injured Ohioans can recover due to negligent medical mistakes. These caps range anywhere from $250,000 to $350,000 depending upon the circumstances. Essentially, your rights were sold as a way to keep healthcare costs down. In other words, limiting your rights in lawsuits was good for you and all Ohioans because you would pay less for health insurance. Sounds all well and good, right?