text: Federal judges are expected to conduct themselves differently than their counterparts in the political branches. This Note considers the policy and historical reasons used to justify this different standard of conduct and concludes that these justifications are largely unsupported or overstated. These erroneous justifications obfuscate the debate over extrajudicial conduct and may result in a suboptimal level of extrajudicial activity.
  Topics: Democracy and Law, Judicial Process, Political TheoryAuthor: Leslie B. Dubeck
  See Also
  Further from the People? The Puzzle of State Administration
  Miriam Seifter
  Regulation via Delegation: A Federalist Perspective on the Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Decision