text: In the coming months before the Nov. 6, 2012 elections, citizens like you will be the key to ending the Barack Obama regime—a regime defined from the get-go by the words of Valerie Jarrett, the president's closest advisor: "Obama is prepared to really take power and begin to rule day one."
  With the current delicate, one-vote U.S. Supreme Court majority first declaring the District of Columbia gun ban unconstitutional, then striking down the Chicago gun ban, those decisions could easily be undone if the 5-4 margin were reversed as aging or ill justices retire. In the aftermath of those two landmark decisions—D.C. and Chicago—other anti-gun laws have fallen across the country. But those remarkable victories for freedom are temporary, hanging by a single vote on the court.
  "The Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of self-defense. ... By its terms, the Second Amendment does not apply to the States: read properly, it does not even apply to individuals outside the militia context."
  Had the one vote margin on the court gone the other way, Stevens' and Breyer's vision of a court-sanctioned disarmed citizenry would have opened the floodgate for gun bans based on the District of Columbia/Chicago models in every urban area in the nation. Mayor Bloomberg's cabal of big-city politicians would have declared open season on their gun-owning citizens.
  Just how tenuous the pro-Second Amendment decisions in Heller and McDonald remain was spelled out by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who told an elite Harvard Club gathering that the high court in McDonald and Heller was "grievously mistaken," and that the minority opinions would ultimately be used to rewrite history, making the Second Amendment a "collective right connected to the militia."
  Such a world is just one U.S. Supreme Court appointment away. It is just one election away—Nov. 6, 2012—an election that represents a turning point for our nation.