text: We often forget what varied and tasty, organic food on the table is not only a direct benefit to the body and potency. Last but not least it is a good mood, "fighting spirit" men. And if psychologically representative of the stronger sex happy, it increases his testosterone level. What can be achieved with the help of pills.
  
  Some of you might remember last year when our infant son Liam played Santa for Daddy. Well, a year on he’s grown quite a bit, but he’s just as eager to spread some holiday joy!
  At the start of our Champions of Kamigawa reviews, we kicked off the Very Kamigawa Christmas giveaway for a festively-wrapped treasure trove of goodies and precon decks, and all it took to enter was to leave a comment on the reviews or just retweet our announcement message.
  With us now entering Planar Chaos territory, we must bid the land of Kamigawa farewell, but not before picking a winner! We randomly selected one comment from each of the eight reviews, then put the author’s name on a slip. Then we randomly picked one retweeter and did the same. It looked a little something like this:
  Then I folded them all up into squares and put them in an Ultra Pro Deck Box. That’s where Liam came in.
  Thanks to everyone who participated! We really enjoy spreading the precon love around with giveaways and contests, and we have a blast when folks get just as into winning them as we do staging them. Aaro, we’ll be in touch and get your parcel off straightaway.
  For those who didn’t win, don’t worry… we’re never far from another contest. Hope everyone enjoyed Champions of Kamigawa, and will check out Planar Chaos!
  Wow, what a great surprise! Not only do you regularly put out top-notch articles and reviews and give deck-building advice, but then you host such generous giveaways on top of it all.
  Earlier this year my brother-in-law re-introduced me to Magic after a lengthy absence, so I think it’s only fitting that I share this with him. 🙂
  Congrats to Aaro, hope it comes in before Christmas. Meanwhile, I’ll hope Planar Chaos shows me an alternate world where I got the prize instead.
  Also let me thank you for all your hard work writing the reviews, and doing these giveaways. Very thanks!
  
  [* red] Remove the two 5.3 mm T6 Torx screws securing the data display cable to the logic board. Take care when removing the screws, they easily fall out of their holes and get stuck under the logic board / fan.
  
  Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973),[1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. It struck down many U.S. federal and state abortion laws,[2][3] and prompted an ongoing national debate in the United States about whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role of religious and moral views in the political sphere should be. Roe v. Wade reshaped American politics, dividing much of the United States into abortion rights and anti- abortion movements, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.
  The decision involved the case of a woman named Norma McCorvey— known in her lawsuit under the pseudonym "Jane Roe"—who in 1969 became pregnant with her third child. McCorvey wanted an abortion, but she lived in Texas, where abortion was illegal except when necessary to save the mother's life. She was referred to lawyers Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, who filed a lawsuit on her behalf in U.S. federal court against her local district attorney, Henry Wade, alleging that Texas's abortion laws were unconstitutional. A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas heard the case and ruled in her favor. Texas then appealed this ruling directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case.
  In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. But it also ruled that this right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and protecting prenatal life.[4][5] The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.[5] The Court classified the right to choose to have an abortion as "fundamental", which required courts to evaluate challenged abortion laws under the "strict scrutiny" standard, the highest level of judicial review in the United States.[6]
  Roe was criticized by some in the legal community,[7] and some have called the decision a form of judicial activism.[8] In 1992, the Supreme Court revisited and modified its legal rulings in Roe in the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey.[9] In Casey, the Court reaffirmed Roe's holding that a woman's right to choose to have an abortion is constitutionally protected, but abandoned Roe's trimester framework in favor of a standard based on fetal viability, and overruled Roe's requirement that government regulations on abortion be subjected to the strict scrutiny standard.[4][10]
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Establishment_of_religion
  "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose whether or not to have an abortion. This right is not absolute, and must
  Role in subsequent decisions and politics Webster v. Reproductive Health Services Planned Parenthood v. Casey Stenberg v. Carhart Gonzales v. Carhart Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt Activities of Norma McCorvey Activities of Sarah Weddington Presidential positions State laws regarding Roe
  According to the Court, "the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage." Providing a historical analysis on abortion, Justice Harry Blackmun noted that abortion was "resorted to without scruple" in Greek and Roman times.[11] Blackmun also addressed the permissive and restrictive abortion attitudes and laws throughout history, noting the disagreements among leaders (of all different professions) in those eras and the formative laws and cases.[12] In the United States, in 1821,
  Connecticut passed the first state statute criminalizing abortion. Every state had abortion legislation by 1900.[13] In the United States, abortion was sometimes considered a common law crime,[14] though Justice Blackmun would conclude that the criminalization of abortion did not have "roots in the English common-law tradition."[15] Rather than arresting the women having the abortions, legal officials were more likely to interrogate these women to obtain evidence against the abortion provider in order to close down that provider's business.[16][17]
  In 1971, Shirley Wheeler was charged with manslaughter after Florida hospital staff reported her illegal abortion to the police. She received a sentence of two years' probation and, under her probation, had to move back into her parents' house in North Carolina.[16] The Boston Women's Abortion Coalition held a rally for Wheeler in Boston to raise money and awareness of her charges as well as had staff members from the Women's National Abortion Action Coalition (WONAAC) speak at the rally.[18] Wheeler was possibly the first woman to be held criminally responsible for submitting to an abortion.[19] Her conviction was overturned by the Florida Supreme Court.[16]
  With the passage of the California Therapeutic Abortion Act[20] in 1967, abortion became essentially legal on demand in that state. Pregnant women in other states could travel to California to obtain legal abortions—if they could afford to. A flight from Dallas to Los Angeles was nicknamed "the abortion special" because so many of its passengers were traveling for that reason. There were prepackaged trips known as the "non-family plan".[21]
  In June 1969, 21-year-old Norma McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, where friends advised her to falsely claim that she had been raped, incorrectly believing that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest when it actually allowed abortion only "for the purpose of saving the life of the mother". She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found that the unauthorized facility had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.[22][23] McCorvey would end up giving birth before the case was decided, and the child was put up for adoption.[24]
  In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, who represented the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was a result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped, in hope to circumvent a Texas law that banned abortions except when the woman's life is in danger.[25][26][27] "Rape" is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in the case.[28]
  On June 17, 1970, a three-judge panel of the District Court, consisting of Northern District of Texas Judges Sarah T. Hughes, William McLaughlin Taylor Jr. and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Irving Loeb Goldberg, unanimously[28] declared the Texas law unconstitutional, finding that it violated the right to privacy found in the Ninth Amendment. In addition, the court relied on Justice Arthur Goldberg's 1965 concurrence in Griswold v. Connecticut. The court, however, declined to grant an injunction against enforcement of the law.[29]
  Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970. The justices delayed taking action on Roe and a closely related case, Doe v. Bolton, until they had decided Younger v. Harris (because they felt the appeals raised difficult questions on judicial jurisdiction) and United States v. Vuitch (in which they considered the constitutionality of a District of Columbia statute that criminalized abortion except where the mother's life or health was endangered). In Vuitch, the Court narrowly upheld the statute, though in doing so, it treated abortion as a medical procedure and stated that physicians must be given room to determine what constitutes a danger to (physical or mental) health. The day after they announced their decision in Vuitch, they voted to hear both Roe and Doe.[30]
  Arguments were scheduled by the full Court for December 13, 1971. Before the Court could hear the oral arguments, Justices Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan II retired. Chief Justice Warren Burger asked Justice Potter Stewart and Justice Blackmun to determine whether Roe and Doe, among others, should be heard as scheduled. According to Blackmun, Stewart felt that the cases were a straightforward application of Younger v. Harris, and they recommended that the Court move forward as scheduled.[31]