text: Humble Student of the Markets: November 2015
  Evidence is piling up that we are entering a late cycle market. Note that I am referring to a late market cycle, which may be different from an economic cycle. In this case, however, the market and economic cycles appear to be more or less synchronized. Here is the framework that I use to describe an idealized market cycle (see The bearish verdict from market cycle analysis):
  I would also add that in the late part of the expansion, excesses start to appear and sometimes begin to unravel, which is what we are starting to see today. Examples include record levels of Mergers and Acquisitions; wounded and dying unicorns and the growing sense of panic in Silicon Valley (via Luke Kawa), as exemplified by Fidelity`s 25% writedown of its Snapchat stake; and the frothiness seen in the art market.
  Negative omens from the credit market
  In the past couple of week, I have also been watching with great concern as bearish omens have appeared from the bond and credit markets. First, Tracy Alloway documented a number of uneasy signs highlighting the fragility of the bond market:
  Negative swap spreads, which is signaling a possible lack of liquidity in Treasury paper.
  Fractured repo rates, which is also a sign of limited liquidity.
  Corporate bond inventories below zero, ditto.
  Synthetic credit is trading tighter than cash credit, which is also a sign that the market is paying for liquidity in the form of tighter spreads.
  Market moves that aren't supposed to happen keep happening, which can be caused by illiquid markets failing to clear at critical periods.
  Volatility is itself more volatile.
  On top of that, we are seeing signs of other excesses. Corporate leverage is rising, which is a logical response to the ultra-low rates of the last few years (via Business Insider).
  The combination of these factors are just indications that the credit markets are fragile. A good analogy might be riding around in a motorcycle at high speeds without a helmet on. Nothing will happen to you unless your crash. In that case, the outcome might not be very pretty.
  The motorcycle may be approaching a twisty and bumpy road. Deutsche Bank recently sounded a warning about rising defaults, as yield spreads are starting to blow out (via Business Insider):
  With the recent back-up in both IG [investment grade] and HY [high-yield] spreads to their respective 3.5-year wides, a discussion has emerged about whether the market is sensing the next default cycle around the corner or is simply "overreacting" to some exogenous but ultimately irrelevant events. At 570bp ex-energy spreads, the market is well ahead of what would normally be considered sufficient compensation for defaults that are still tracking sub-2% in this segment of our markets.
  The Deutsche analysts are worried:
  The message from the credit markets is indeed worrisome. Yield spreads are rising across all credits, from investment grade to high yield. History shows that rising spreads have been a precursor to economic recessions, which are bull market killers. However, this signal has been very early in its recession warning in two out of the last three economic cycles.
  Despite these negative signals from the bond and credit markets, I am not ready to hit the panic button yet, as there is no sign of a recession on the horizon. I am grateful to New Deal democrat for his long leading indicator framework, which he adapted from Geoffrey Moore (see his post where he outlines his methodology here). New Deal democrat monitors seven long leading indicators and only one is negative:
  Corporate bond yields (negative)
  Corporate profits and Proprietors` income, which can be a more timely proxy for corporate profits
  Yield curve, which may not be relevant in the current ZIRP environment
  Residential real private investment
  My interpretation of current conditions indicate risks are rising but we are in no imminent danger of an economic downturn. Instead, the US economy is entering the late cycle phase of the economic expansion.
  The "normal" way of playing a late cycle expansion is to rotate into the deep cyclical sectors, such as energy and mining. However, I have been seeing charts like this last week (via Jereon Blokland) indicating that commodity prices are hitting new lows, which is undoubtedly giving many investors pause.
  Is asset inflation dead, or are commodities a contrarian buy? I believe that this is setting up to be a classic contrarian value play, which can be defined as putting on a position that makes you distinctly uncomfortable. This value investment theme was reinforced by the news that billionaire and deep value investor Seth Klarman had bought a 53 million share stake in Alcoa.
  An inflection point for inflation and hard assets may be just around the corner. Goldman Sachs warned that the market is underestimating future inflation (via Bloomberg):
  A rebound in the bond market's inflation view would signal rising investor confidence in the Fed's ability to increase interest rates without derailing the economy. Stronger-than-forecast U.S. jobs data on Nov. 6 backed up the case for the central bank to boost its benchmark rate from near zero at its meeting next month.
  A turnaround in the inflation measure could happen quickly because the gauge is so low compared with where the bank assesses fair value -- a statistically rare two standard deviations away -- according to Ardagna.
  Is inflation truly dead? The Atlanta Fed's labor market spider chart shows steady improvement on all dimensions, indicating imminent wage and cost-post pressures.
  Benn Steil pointed out that despite the Fed's tightening tilt, global central banks are still adding aggregate liquidity to their balance sheets:
  Commodities are becoming a crowded short. Meb Faber recently rhetorically asked Why You Should Ask For Coal (Stocks) In Your Stockings This Holiday Season because of how washed out they are. Bloomberg reported that GLD assets are hitting 2008 levels:
  From a chartist's viewpoint, the relative performance of late cycle sectors is becoming more constructive. This 20-year relative performance chart of energy stocks to the SPX show that energy is testing a relative support zone with signs of positive RSI divergence.
  I am also seeing a similar pattern of positive divergence on the relative performance of gold stocks as they test relative support.
  This chart of the spread of PPI to CPI (blue line) shows that it is at levels where it has historically rebounded. The green line depicts the YoY change in the important industrial commodity complex, copper and copper products, which is poised to rise.
  Tom McClellan identified a 10 month cycle in copper prices (ht Jeff Miller), indicating that the red metal may be nearing an inflection point:
  McClellan did warn, however, that copper typically bottoms with a capitulation sell-off that we haven't seen yet:
  The 10 month cycle in copper price bottoms says that a bottom is due imminently. But we are not yet seeing a big negative reading on the ROC to say that we have seen a washout selloff. When that washout eventually comes, there will likely be some big geopolitical or economic news to justify the selloff, and to help facilitate the washout selling wave. So when you hear that the sky is falling in the copper market, that will be the signal that the bottom is almost at hand.
  When I put it all together, these late cycle sectors are getting ready to rocket upwards based on the combination of extreme negative sentiment and the benefit of an unexpected macro tailwind (also see this bullish commodity comment developed independently from Market Anthropology). Should the Fed raise rates in December, analysis from Barclays show that energy, materials and capital goods sectors, along with selected financial stocks that benefit from higher rates, tend to outperform (via Bloomberg):
  I expect that late cycle sectors like capital goods and commodity producers should be the surprise winners over the next 6-9 months. Investors should be accumulating positions now, while traders may either wait for oversold extremes or a technical breakout before buying.
  Last Sunday, I postulated that stocks would see some consolidation and pullback, which is exactly what we saw in the week (see Global reflation = Buy risk (and cyclicals)). The weakness overshot my targets, however, as I expected initial SPX support at 2055-2060 to hold. Instead, the SPX retreated and tested the first Fibonacci retracement level of 2020. Readings are oversold on RSI5 and the VIX Index, which is now above its upper Bollinger Band.
  Breadth measures such as this chart of % of stocks above their 10 dma on IndexIndicators are at levels where stocks have rallied in the past. These oversold conditions suggest that any stock market weakness in reaction to the Paris attacks should be viewed as temporary and a buying opportunity.
  On an intermediate term basis, I view the market action last week in the context of a breather in the wake of a Zweig Breadth Thrust, which is a powerful bullish momentum signal that lasts many months (see Bingo! We have a buy signal!).
  My inner investor remains bullishly positioned in stocks. My inner trader was averaging in as the market weakened last week. He bought a small position in gold stocks on Tuesday, bought SPX on Thursday and added to his long energy positions on Friday.