text: What Employers Need to Know about the Senate Proposed Healthcare Bill | JRW Associates, Inc., a Raleigh Benefit Advisory Firm – JRW Associates
  OSHA Releases the Emergency Temporary Standard
  919.571.0883 Mineral
  Home
  About JRW
  About JRW AssociatesOur Team
  What Do You Get?
  Strategic Planning
  HR Technology
  Employee Benefit CenterBenefit AdministrationHR Resources
  Resources
  WebinarsARPA ResourcesCOVID-19 ResourcesOSHA Emergency Temporary Standard
  Get In Touch
  What Employers Need to Know about the Senate Proposed Healthcare Bill | JRW Associates, Inc., a Raleigh Benefit Advisory Firm
  July 2, 2017
  By JRW
  On June 22, 2017, the United States Senate released a “Discussion Draft” of the “Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017” (BCRA), which would substitute the House’s House Resolution 1628, a reconciliation bill aimed at “repealing and replacing” the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The House bill was titled the “American Health Care Act of 2017” (AHCA). Employers with group health plans should continue to monitor the progress in Washington, D.C., and should not stop adhering to any provisions of the ACA in the interim, or begin planning to comply with provisions in either the BCRA or the AHCA.
  Next Steps
  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is expected to score the bill by Monday, June 26, 2017.
  The Senate will likely begin the voting process on the bill on June 28 and a final vote is anticipated sometime on June 29.
  The Senate and House versions will have to be reconciled. This can be done with a conference committee, or by sending amendments back and forth between the chambers. With a conference committee, a conference report requires agreement by a majority of conferees from the House, and a majority of conferees by the Senate (not both together). Alternatively, the House could simply agree to the Senate version, or start over again with new legislation.
  The BCRA
  Like the AHCA, the BCRA makes numerous changes to current law, much of which impact the individual market, Medicare, and Medicaid with effects on employer sponsored group health plans. Also like the AHCA, the BCRA removes both the individual and the employer shared responsibility penalties. The BCRA also pushes implementation of the Cadillac tax to 2025 and permits states to waive essential health benefit (EHB) requirements.
  The BCRA would change the excise tax paid by health savings account (HSA) owners who use their HSA funds on expenses that are not medical expenses under the Internal Revenue Code from the current 20 percent to 10 percent. It would also change the maximum contribution limits to HSAs to the amount of the accompanying high deductible health plan’s deductible and out-of-pocket limitation and provide for both spouses to make catch-up contributions to HSAs. The AHCA contains those provisions as well.
  Like the AHCA, the BCRA would remove the $2,600 contribution limit to flexible health spending accounts (FSAs) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
  The BCRA would allow individuals to remain on their parents’ plan until age 26 (the same as the ACA’s regulations, and the AHCA) and would not allow insurers to increase premium costs or deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. Conversely, the AHCA provides for a “continuous health insurance coverage incentive,” which will allow health insurers to charge policyholders an amount equal to 30 percent of the monthly premium in the individual and small group market, if the individual failed to have creditable coverage for 63 or more days during an applicable 12-month look-back period.
  The BCRA would also return permissible age band rating (for purposes of calculating health plan premiums) to the pre-ACA ratio of 5:1, rather than the ACA’s 3:1. This allows older individuals to be charged up to five times more than what younger individuals pay for the same policy, rather than up to the ACA limit of three times more. This is also proposed in the AHCA.
  The ACA’s cost sharing subsidies for insurers would be eliminated in 2020, with the ability of the President to eliminate them earlier. The ACA’s current premium tax credits for individuals to use when purchasing Marketplace coverage would be based on age, income, and geography, and would lower the top threshold of income eligible to receive them from 400 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) to 350 percent of the FPL. The ACA allowed any “alien lawfully present in the US” to utilize the premium tax credit; however, the BCRA would change that to “a qualified alien” under the definition provided in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. The BCRA would also benchmark against the applicable median cost benchmark plan, rather than the second lowest cost silver plan.
  As HSAs get bandied about in Senate discussions, be sure to view UBA’s “Special Report: How Health Savings Accounts Measure Up”, for a detailed look at the prevalence and enrollment rates among HSA (and HRA) plans by industry and region, including how much employers are contributing to these plans.
  Leave a Reply Cancel reply
  Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
  Comment *
  Name *
  Email *
  Website
  Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
  Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.