text: I think that you have some valid points of contention in this reply, but overall you seem to get carried away by the issues of Intelligent Design, Creationism and Young Earth creationism. These are perhaps issues, but not the all-encompassing basis of my critique of the video, nor the opinions of scientists who have looked at and tackled the issue. In my answer was a link to some evidential, empirical reasons why this films assertion is a farce.
  No-one is contending that there was not an explosion in the Cambrian – not wikipedia, not Darwin’s Dilemma, not the scientists, not me, not you.
  With major regards to your arguments regarding Paul Nelson, I will qoute his own words on his own views and I will also refer you to a book that he co-wrote regarding his views on Young Earth Creationism. His words I quote, (YEC= Young Earth Creationism)
  1. I became a fellow at Discovery in 1996, and published a chapter defending YEC with John Mark Reynolds (in the Zondervan volume Three Views on Creation and Evolution) in 1999. In fact, the submission of my chapter MS was delayed, much to the consternation of the Zondervan editors, because Discovery colleagues were urging me to drop out of the book. I’ve never made any effort to hide my YEC convictions, which are mainly theological in origin.