text: Effects of Tree Species Diversity on Litter Quality and Decomposition | SpringerLink
  Forest Diversity and Function pp 149-164 | Cite as
  Inter- and intraspecific variation in leaf litter quality is substantial and substrate quality is of overriding importance for rates of litter decay and mineralization within a forest site. Although this has long been recognized, the functional significance of litter mixtures for decomposition processes and ecosystem functioning has surprisingly been little explored. The currently available literature summarized here shows that studies specifically addressing litter diversity effects on decomposition rarely included more than two species and were carried out predominantly in temperate forests with other forest ecosystems outside the temperate zone (most importantly tropical forests) critically underrepresented.
  Nevertheless, non-additive litter mixture effects on mass loss and/or nutrient mineralization have been observed in about half of all studies, suggesting that litter species richness and/or composition can have important implications for decomposition processes and ecosystem functioning. The relationship between litter species richness and process rate, however, does not yet appear to be predictable, and the currently available data suggest that the identity of species within a mixture is more important than the number of species. A comprehensive mechanistic approach in the analysis of diversity effects would substantially improve our understanding of the functional significance of litter diversity for decomposition and should be of high priority for future research. To get there, I think we first need to abandon the idea of a single, true correlation between diversity and process rate. The few studies separating diversity effects on decomposition of individual component species strongly suggest that we have to focus beyond such simple correlations based on litter mixtures as a whole. Unraveling interactions across trophic levels, identifying specific compounds such as polyphenols acting as inhibitors or stimulators in the process of decomposition, and the investigation of nutrient transfer among litter species are three promising areas of future, mechanistically oriented research.
  Leaf Litter Litter Decomposition Litter Quality Litter Type Oribatid Mite
  Aber JD, Melillo JM, McClaugherty CA (1990) Predicting long-term patterns of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can J Bot 68:2201–2208Google Scholar
  Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P et al (1993) Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20:127–159Google Scholar
  Càrcamo HA, Abe TA, Prescott CE, Holl FB, Chanway CP (2000) Influence of millipedes on litter decomposition, N mineralization, and microbial communities in a coastal forest in British Columbia, Canada. Can J For Res 30:817–826Google Scholar
  Chapin FS III., Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  Coûteaux M-M, Bottner P, Berg B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10:63–66Google Scholar
  Fyles JW, Fyles IH (1993) Interaction of Douglas-fir with red alder and salal foliage litter during decomposition. Can J For Res 23:358–361Google Scholar
  Gustafson FG (1943) Decomposition of the leaves of some forest trees under field conditions. Plant Physiol 18:704–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  Hansen RA, Coleman DC (1998) Litter complexity and composition are determinants of the diversity and species composition of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatidae) in litterbags. Appl Soil Ecol 9:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  Hassall M, Turner JG, Rands MRW (1987) Effects of terrestrial isopods on the decomposition of different woodland leaf litter. Oecologia 72:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  Hättenschwiler S, Bretscher D (2001) Isopod effects on decomposition of litter produced under elevated CO2, N deposition and different soil types. Global Change Biol 7:565–579Google Scholar
  Hättenschwiler S, Hagerman AE, Vitousek PM (2003) Polyphenols in litter from tropical montane forests across a wide range in soil fertility. Biogeochemistry 64:129–148Google Scholar
  Johnston DR (1953) A laboratory study of the decomposition of vegetable debris in relation to the formation of raw humus. Plant Soil 4:345–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  Klemmedson JO (1992) Decomposition and nutrient release from mixtures of Gambel oak and ponderosa pine leaf litter. For Ecol Manage 47:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA, Dahlberg A (1999) Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant-soil system. Oikos 86:16–26Google Scholar
  Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Venramini F, Cabido M, Castellanos A (2000) Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant Soil 218:21–30Google Scholar
  Prescott CE, Zabek LM, Staley CL, Kabzerns R (2000) Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Can J For Res 30:1742–1750Google Scholar
  Rustad LE, Cronan CS (1988) Element loss and retention during litter decay in a red spruce stand in Maine. Can J For Res 18:947–953Google Scholar
  Seastedt TR (1984) The role of arthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu Rev Entomol 29:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  Scheu S (1987) Microbial activity and nutrient dynamics in earthworm casts (Lumbricidae). Biol Fert Soils 5:230–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Univ California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  Taylor BR, Parkinson D, Parsons WFJ (1989a) Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology 70:97–104Google Scholar
  Taylor BR, Parsons WFJ, Parkinson D (1989b) Decomposition of Populus tremuloides leaf litter accelerated by addition of Alnus crispa litter. Can J For Res 19:674–679Google Scholar
  Thomas WA (1968) Decomposition of loblolly pine needles with and without addition of dogwood leaves. Ecology 49:568–571Google Scholar
  Vitousek PM, Turner DR, Parton WJ, Sanford RL (1994) Litter decomposition on the Mauna Loa environmental matrix, Hawai'i: patterns, mechanisms, and models. Ecology 75:418–429Google Scholar
  Zimmer M (2002) Is decomposition of leaf litter influenced by its species richness? Soil Biol Biochem 34:277–284Google Scholar
  Hättenschwiler S. (2005) Effects of Tree Species Diversity on Litter Quality and Decomposition. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner C., Schulze ED. (eds) Forest Diversity and Function. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis), vol 176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg