code: def logical_form_to_action_sequence(self, logical_form: str) -> List[str]:
          
          expression = util.lisp_to_nested_expression(logical_form)
          try:
              transitions, start_type = self._get_transitions(expression, expected_type=None)
              if self._start_types and start_type not in self._start_types:
                  raise ParsingError(f"Expression had unallowed start type of {start_type}: {expression}")
          except ParsingError:
              logger.error(f'Error parsing logical form: {logical_form}')
              raise
          transitions.insert(0, f'@start@ -> {start_type}')
          return transitions
docs: Converts a logical form into a linearization of the production rules from its abstract
          syntax tree.  The linearization is top-down, depth-first.
  
          Each production rule is formatted as "LHS -> RHS", where "LHS" is a single non-terminal
          type, and RHS is either a terminal or a list of non-terminals (other possible values for
          RHS in a more general context-free grammar are not produced by our grammar induction
          logic).
  
          Non-terminals are `types` in the grammar, either basic types (like ``int``, ``str``, or
          some class that you define), or functional types, represented with angle brackets with a
          colon separating arguments from the return type.  Multi-argument functions have commas
          separating their argument types.  For example, ``<int:int>`` is a function that takes an
          integer and returns an integer, and ``<int,int:int>`` is a function that takes two integer
          arguments and returns an integer.
  
          As an example translation from logical form to complete action sequence, the logical form
          ``(add 2 3)`` would be translated to ``['@start@ -> int', 'int -> [<int,int:int>, int, int]',
          '<int,int:int> -> add', 'int -> 2', 'int -> 3']``.